• Batteries to complement Solar Power

    From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 8 14:51:55 2024
    While our generation mix is not the same as that of the USA, it is
    good to know that battery storage is being found sufficiently
    profitable in the USA for developers are deploying batteries at a
    record pace.

    https://www.ft.com/content/ac126e7e-6c8d-4ba2-84ea-bcada85e5e8f

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordon@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Sat Jun 8 03:45:32 2024
    On 2024-06-08, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    While our generation mix is not the same as that of the USA, it is
    good to know that battery storage is being found sufficiently
    profitable in the USA for developers are deploying batteries at a
    record pace.

    https://www.ft.com/content/ac126e7e-6c8d-4ba2-84ea-bcada85e5e8f

    Pump up the price to a high enough level and batteries can work finanically. Also it surely is a given that any intermittent power source needs a back up
    it it is going to be used 24/7.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Sat Jun 8 06:43:16 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    While our generation mix is not the same as that of the USA, it is
    good to know that battery storage is being found sufficiently
    profitable in the USA for developers are deploying batteries at a
    record pace.

    https://www.ft.com/content/ac126e7e-6c8d-4ba2-84ea-bcada85e5e8f
    On the face of it a good idea. However, we still have not solved the problem of recycling/disposal of old batteries. Another headlong rush into new technology without a real plan for the future?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Goodwin@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 9 12:08:29 2024
    In article <part1of1.1.TTyG#bNNBQQS4A@ue.ph>, lizandtony@orcon.net.nz
    says...

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    While our generation mix is not the same as that of the USA, it is
    good to know that battery storage is being found sufficiently
    profitable in the USA for developers are deploying batteries at a
    record pace.

    https://www.ft.com/content/ac126e7e-6c8d-4ba2-84ea-bcada85e5e8f
    On the face of it a good idea. However, we still have not solved the problem of
    recycling/disposal of old batteries. Another headlong rush into new technology
    without a real plan for the future?

    There is no particular reason why Lithium chemistry batteries can't be
    recycled in the same fashion as lead-acid, and there are far more
    valuable things in a lithium battery than the lead, sulfur and plastic
    in a Lead-Acid batter making recycling them much more worthwhile.

    It will just cost *a lot* of money to setup that industry from scratch
    which means volume is required to make it viable. And until recently I
    guess that volume just hasn't existed. It takes effort to remove the
    batteries from old phones, laptops, vapes and other small consumer
    devices and there appears to be no regulation requiring this to be done
    like there are for lead-acid batteries. But now that there are cars
    driving around with huge battery packs that volume is now possibly
    there.

    Li-Cycle is one company working to setup a full recycling process for
    them, though I think they've been having difficulty getting the money
    required to finish building their main recycling hub facility. You can
    see a video showing the first stage of their recycling process here
    though: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2xrarUWVRQ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to David Goodwin on Sun Jun 9 03:18:20 2024
    David Goodwin <david+usenet@zx.net.nz> wrote:
    In article <part1of1.1.TTyG#bNNBQQS4A@ue.ph>, lizandtony@orcon.net.nz
    says...

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    While our generation mix is not the same as that of the USA, it is
    good to know that battery storage is being found sufficiently
    profitable in the USA for developers are deploying batteries at a
    record pace.

    https://www.ft.com/content/ac126e7e-6c8d-4ba2-84ea-bcada85e5e8f
    On the face of it a good idea. However, we still have not solved the problem >>of
    recycling/disposal of old batteries. Another headlong rush into new >>technology
    without a real plan for the future?

    There is no particular reason why Lithium chemistry batteries can't be >recycled in the same fashion as lead-acid, and there are far more
    valuable things in a lithium battery than the lead, sulfur and plastic
    in a Lead-Acid batter making recycling them much more worthwhile.

    It will just cost *a lot* of money to setup that industry from scratch
    which means volume is required to make it viable. And until recently I
    guess that volume just hasn't existed. It takes effort to remove the >batteries from old phones, laptops, vapes and other small consumer
    devices and there appears to be no regulation requiring this to be done
    like there are for lead-acid batteries. But now that there are cars
    driving around with huge battery packs that volume is now possibly
    there.

    Li-Cycle is one company working to setup a full recycling process for
    them, though I think they've been having difficulty getting the money >required to finish building their main recycling hub facility. You can
    see a video showing the first stage of their recycling process here
    though: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2xrarUWVRQ
    OK but it is still to happen. There needs to be something that drives it. Regulation or profit.
    What I failed to menation is the human/environmental cost of mining lithium - but that is another question.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Goodwin@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 9 22:27:40 2024
    In article <part1of1.1.FRMBH4kJvCZcFA@ue.ph>, lizandtony@orcon.net.nz
    says...

    David Goodwin <david+usenet@zx.net.nz> wrote:
    In article <part1of1.1.TTyG#bNNBQQS4A@ue.ph>, lizandtony@orcon.net.nz >says...

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    While our generation mix is not the same as that of the USA, it is
    good to know that battery storage is being found sufficiently
    profitable in the USA for developers are deploying batteries at a
    record pace.

    https://www.ft.com/content/ac126e7e-6c8d-4ba2-84ea-bcada85e5e8f
    On the face of it a good idea. However, we still have not solved the problem
    of
    recycling/disposal of old batteries. Another headlong rush into new >>technology
    without a real plan for the future?

    There is no particular reason why Lithium chemistry batteries can't be >recycled in the same fashion as lead-acid, and there are far more
    valuable things in a lithium battery than the lead, sulfur and plastic
    in a Lead-Acid batter making recycling them much more worthwhile.

    It will just cost *a lot* of money to setup that industry from scratch >which means volume is required to make it viable. And until recently I >guess that volume just hasn't existed. It takes effort to remove the >batteries from old phones, laptops, vapes and other small consumer
    devices and there appears to be no regulation requiring this to be done >like there are for lead-acid batteries. But now that there are cars
    driving around with huge battery packs that volume is now possibly
    there.

    Li-Cycle is one company working to setup a full recycling process for
    them, though I think they've been having difficulty getting the money >required to finish building their main recycling hub facility. You can
    see a video showing the first stage of their recycling process here
    though: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2xrarUWVRQ
    OK but it is still to happen. There needs to be something that drives it. Regulation or profit.

    Li-Cycle (and their investors) seem to thing recycling will be
    profitable enough to be worthwhile - time will tell I guess. Of course
    its still fairly early days with all of this stuff and no one was going
    to attempt large scale recycling before there was large scale deployment
    of stuff to recycle so I don't think the lack of recycling today is
    cause for concern.

    What I failed to menation is the human/environmental cost of mining lithium - but that is another question.

    People opposed to electrification in one way or another often seem to
    bring up the human and environment cost of mining lithium as though the
    oil, gas and coal industries have a clean environmental record (not to
    mention all the other minerals we mine and process).

    No mining is good for the environment but avoiding it entirely isn't
    really an option so we're left with choosing the least worst options. In
    the case of lithium it is at least reusable (you can charge a battery
    multiple times) and recycleable (even if it isn't recycled right now),
    where as the fossil fuels lithium batteries displace are single use.
    They're gone forever once used requiring additional mining/extraction to
    obtain more.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to David Goodwin on Sun Jun 9 20:26:58 2024
    David Goodwin <david+usenet@zx.net.nz> wrote:
    In article <part1of1.1.FRMBH4kJvCZcFA@ue.ph>, lizandtony@orcon.net.nz
    says...

    David Goodwin <david+usenet@zx.net.nz> wrote:
    In article <part1of1.1.TTyG#bNNBQQS4A@ue.ph>, lizandtony@orcon.net.nz
    says...

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    While our generation mix is not the same as that of the USA, it is
    good to know that battery storage is being found sufficiently
    profitable in the USA for developers are deploying batteries at a
    record pace.

    https://www.ft.com/content/ac126e7e-6c8d-4ba2-84ea-bcada85e5e8f
    On the face of it a good idea. However, we still have not solved the
    problem
    of
    recycling/disposal of old batteries. Another headlong rush into new
    technology
    without a real plan for the future?

    There is no particular reason why Lithium chemistry batteries can't be
    recycled in the same fashion as lead-acid, and there are far more
    valuable things in a lithium battery than the lead, sulfur and plastic
    in a Lead-Acid batter making recycling them much more worthwhile.

    It will just cost *a lot* of money to setup that industry from scratch
    which means volume is required to make it viable. And until recently I
    guess that volume just hasn't existed. It takes effort to remove the
    batteries from old phones, laptops, vapes and other small consumer
    devices and there appears to be no regulation requiring this to be done
    like there are for lead-acid batteries. But now that there are cars
    driving around with huge battery packs that volume is now possibly
    there.

    Li-Cycle is one company working to setup a full recycling process for
    them, though I think they've been having difficulty getting the money
    required to finish building their main recycling hub facility. You can
    see a video showing the first stage of their recycling process here
    though: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2xrarUWVRQ
    OK but it is still to happen. There needs to be something that drives it.
    Regulation or profit.

    Li-Cycle (and their investors) seem to thing recycling will be
    profitable enough to be worthwhile - time will tell I guess. Of course
    its still fairly early days with all of this stuff and no one was going
    to attempt large scale recycling before there was large scale deployment
    of stuff to recycle so I don't think the lack of recycling today is
    cause for concern.
    I don't think anybody is planning, that is my concern.

    What I failed to menation is the human/environmental cost of mining lithium >>-
    but that is another question.

    People opposed to electrification in one way or another often seem to
    bring up the human and environment cost of mining lithium as though the
    oil, gas and coal industries have a clean environmental record (not to >mention all the other minerals we mine and process).
    I am not opposed to electrification in the slightest - fact is Lithium mining carries some environmental and human consequences. Just because other activities also do does not excuse the fact.

    No mining is good for the environment but avoiding it entirely isn't
    really an option so we're left with choosing the least worst options. In
    the case of lithium it is at least reusable (you can charge a battery >multiple times) and recycleable (even if it isn't recycled right now),
    where as the fossil fuels lithium batteries displace are single use.
    They're gone forever once used requiring additional mining/extraction to >obtain more.
    I just want to see some planning.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)