1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. NZ.GENERAL

  • Re: CO? is good for plants apparently.

    From Tony@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Mon Jul 22 07:55:31 2024
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    Ah, the aficionado of circular reasoning is at it again.

    Pick the evidence you like, and disregard that you don’t? Check.

    Villify those who call you out on it? Check.
    So why do you keep doing that?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BR@21:1/5 to ldo@nz.invalid on Tue Jul 23 05:00:58 2024
    On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 07:16:19 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
    <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    Ah, the aficionado of circular reasoning is at it again.

    Pick the evidence you like, and disregard that you don’t? Check.

    What evidence is there that a slight increase in CO2 is a bad thing?

    Bill.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to blah@blah.blah on Tue Jul 23 03:30:18 2024
    BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 07:16:19 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro ><ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    Ah, the aficionado of circular reasoning is at it again.

    Pick the evidence you like, and disregard that you don’t? Check.

    What evidence is there that a slight increase in CO2 is a bad thing?

    Bill.
    Zero.
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)