• Constitutional Impropriety

    From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Fri Aug 23 22:36:00 2024
    https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/08/23/geoffrey-palmer-lurching-towards-constitutional-impropriety/

    This article will be gaily dismissed without even reading all of it by
    many, but it does contain some interesting hints at what may happen -
    Advice from John Key and more importantly the Attorney General Judith
    Collins) appear to be likely to be ignored - it would indeed be poetic
    justice if one or more of the three Ministers able to make decisions
    under the "Fast Track" legislation find themselves found guilty of
    corruption as a result.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Crash@21:1/5 to All on Sat Aug 24 10:16:44 2024
    On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 22:36:00 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/08/23/geoffrey-palmer-lurching-towards-constitutional-impropriety/

    This article will be gaily dismissed without even reading all of it by
    many, but it does contain some interesting hints at what may happen -
    Advice from John Key and more importantly the Attorney General Judith >Collins) appear to be likely to be ignored - it would indeed be poetic >justice if one or more of the three Ministers able to make decisions
    under the "Fast Track" legislation find themselves found guilty of
    corruption as a result.

    For the most part Palmer reflects on his previously-stated
    constitutional comments and provides some insight on current issues.

    The need for Parliamentary urgency (Pu) now is abated because the most
    urgent actions have been taken by the current government. I would
    find it very concerning if Pu continues to be used - every piece of
    legislation should be afforded scrutiny and public submission.

    Having said that Palmer makes no comment about the need for speed. In
    his view it is acceptable to take years to get to a decision where a
    few months would suffice. Such is the product of an academic mind.

    The Fast Track Bill, and the behaviour of some non-National MPs is
    indeed cause for concern. The bill is going through a large number of submissions and Jones has conceded that decisions by Ministers alone
    may not survive in the bill.

    The reality though is that NZF is the kingpin in the government and
    this is directly because of those few of us electors party-voted for
    them - if just 30,000 voters had chosen another party then NZF would
    not be a part of this Parliament.

    Palmer identifies some issues but for some reason fails to mention
    issues that the last Labour government created. We currently have
    returned to a multi-party government and he is pre-occupied with how
    that is working out, rather than looking at how a single-party
    government acted. His commentary is therefore not objective but
    skewed by his political heritage. Accordingly it is less insightful
    than it might have been.


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)