On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 21:20:55 -0000 (UTC), Tony"at least", 'likely", and other ridiculoius lies. All the evidence you have - zero.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://centrist.co.nz/questioning-climate-alarmism-narratives/
Another reason to seek balance. There is still not a single bit of scientific >>evidence that we are in or about to enter a climate emergency.
On the contrary, there are at least 27 separate instances of
scientific evidence pointing to climate change that in large parts of
the world are likely to be seen as climate emergencies.
Does that make it 27 unsubstantiated assertions against your 1 >unsubstantiated assertion give a 27:1 indication in favour of climate >emergencies being real?No it makes it nil evidence of climate emergency until you post some such evidence - not yet done.
Centrist started as News Essentials, which featured many articles bySo almost certainly apolitical like the union itslef.
people associated with the NZ Taxpayer Union
https://centrist.co.nz/questioning-climate-alarmism-narratives/
Another reason to seek balance. There is still not a single bit of scientific >evidence that we are in or about to enter a climate emergency.
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 21:20:55 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://centrist.co.nz/questioning-climate-alarmism-narratives/
Another reason to seek balance. There is still not a single bit of scientific >>evidence that we are in or about to enter a climate emergency.
On the contrary, there are at least 27 separate instances of
scientific evidence pointing to climate change that in large parts of
the world are likely to be seen as climate emergencies.
Does that make it 27 unsubstantiated assertions against your 1 >unsubstantiated assertion give a 27:1 indication in favour of climate >emergencies being real?
Centrist started as News Essentials, which featured many articles by
people associated with the NZ Taxpayer Union
It was perhaps articles like this that caused it to be absorbed into a
new company: >https://businessdesk.co.nz/article/media/the-curious-case-of-nz-news-essentials-the-buyout-baron-the-rapper-and-the-anti-mandate-influencer
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 11:25:50 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>https://centrist.co.nz/changes-coming-to-nz-news-essentials/ https://nznewsessentials.com/?query-0-page=2 https://centrist.co.nz/media-release-reporter-becomes-the-news/ https://nznewsessentials.com/newsletter-archive/?email_id=104
wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 21:20:55 -0000 (UTC), TonyCare to cite this Rich? I could not find any connections at all
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://centrist.co.nz/questioning-climate-alarmism-narratives/
Another reason to seek balance. There is still not a single bit of scientific
evidence that we are in or about to enter a climate emergency.
On the contrary, there are at least 27 separate instances of
scientific evidence pointing to climate change that in large parts of
the world are likely to be seen as climate emergencies.
Does that make it 27 unsubstantiated assertions against your 1 >>unsubstantiated assertion give a 27:1 indication in favour of climate >>emergencies being real?
Centrist started as News Essentials, which featured many articles by
people associated with the NZ Taxpayer Union
between the two companies and no details about who wrote (or writes)
for them.
It was perhaps articles like this that caused it to be absorbed into a
new company: >>https://businessdesk.co.nz/article/media/the-curious-case-of-nz-news-essentials-the-buyout-baron-the-rapper-and-the-anti-mandate-influencer
Pay walled.
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 12:50:30 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 11:25:50 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:https://centrist.co.nz/changes-coming-to-nz-news-essentials/ >https://nznewsessentials.com/?query-0-page=2 >https://centrist.co.nz/media-release-reporter-becomes-the-news/ >https://nznewsessentials.com/newsletter-archive/?email_id=104
On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 21:20:55 -0000 (UTC), TonyCare to cite this Rich? I could not find any connections at all
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://centrist.co.nz/questioning-climate-alarmism-narratives/
Another reason to seek balance. There is still not a single bit of scientific
evidence that we are in or about to enter a climate emergency.
On the contrary, there are at least 27 separate instances of
scientific evidence pointing to climate change that in large parts of
the world are likely to be seen as climate emergencies.
Does that make it 27 unsubstantiated assertions against your 1 >>>unsubstantiated assertion give a 27:1 indication in favour of climate >>>emergencies being real?
Centrist started as News Essentials, which featured many articles by >>>people associated with the NZ Taxpayer Union
between the two companies and no details about who wrote (or writes)
for them.
And association with NZ Taxpayer Union - interesting that News
Essentials / Centrist appear to have purged articles by Peter Williams >https://www.taxpayers.org.nz/peter_williams_joins_taxpayers_union_board
It was perhaps articles like this that caused it to be absorbed into a >>>new company: >>>https://businessdesk.co.nz/article/media/the-curious-case-of-nz-news-essentials-the-buyout-baron-the-rapper-and-the-anti-mandate-influencer
Pay walled.
On the contrary, there are at least 27 separate instances of
scientific evidence pointing to climate change that in large parts of
the world are likely to be seen as climate emergencies.
Does that make it 27 unsubstantiated assertions against your 1 >unsubstantiated assertion give a 27:1 indication in favour of climate >emergencies being real?
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 11:25:50 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On the contrary, there are at least 27 separate instances of
scientific evidence pointing to climate change that in large parts of
the world are likely to be seen as climate emergencies.
Likely to be seen? By whom?
Does that make it 27 unsubstantiated assertions against your 1 >>unsubstantiated assertion give a 27:1 indication in favour of climate >>emergencies being real?
How about the 100% record of predictive failure in the last 50 years
from those who promised world wide climate disasters, none of which
ever happened.
On 2024-08-27, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 11:25:50 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>We are still waiting for the oceans to start boiling as they are getting so >hot. Might happen eh?
wrote:
On the contrary, there are at least 27 separate instances of
scientific evidence pointing to climate change that in large parts of
the world are likely to be seen as climate emergencies.
Likely to be seen? By whom?
Does that make it 27 unsubstantiated assertions against your 1 >>>unsubstantiated assertion give a 27:1 indication in favour of climate >>>emergencies being real?
How about the 100% record of predictive failure in the last 50 years
from those who promised world wide climate disasters, none of which
ever happened.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 28:09:53 |
| Calls: | 10,390 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 14,064 |
| Messages: | 6,417,074 |