https://kirschsubstack.com/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new?utm_source=publication-search&utm_medium=emailWhat a strange way to start a discussion!
I am sick of people who attack the authors and posters of articles that upset >their beliefs or politics.
This article has a significant amount of data and fact supported by that data. No, the data must be downloaded, and how to do that is explained asfollows in the article:
It purports to show that the covid "vaccine" killed people, there is nothing inDid you download the data?
the included data that appears to be incorrect.
I respect people who read the data and address it, but if you simply want to >knock Mr. Kirsch then this is not the place.
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 20:31:32 -0000 (UTC), TonyOnly to someone who has poor comprehenion or someone like you who generally attacks the authors or posters.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new?utm_source=publication-search&utm_medium=emailWhat a strange way to start a discussion!
I am sick of people who attack the authors and posters of articles that upset >>their beliefs or politics.
Is that the best you can do? Being childishly picky.This article has a significant amount of data and fact supported by that >>data.No, the data must be downloaded, and how to do that is explained as
follows in the article:
"The repository: Downloading the data and tools from the S3 file
server
The MIT presentation listed above has everything you need including
the credentials to download all the data.
Here are the new credentials:
S3 compatible Server: service.skirsch.com:9003 (as of Jun 23, 2024)
Public API keys:
Access: CpQWGbhGXn52F3hSgdqQ
Secret: bvvitCh5BkyGK2vf3ZllFqjoLfT1G3NgAzejQ1PK
You can only access the data-transparency bucket for now. There’s more
that I’m not disclosing yet (including a new US source other than
Medicare).
You can use any S3 file browser to download such as CloudBerry
Explorer or CyberDuck or Amazon’s S3 Browser.
Pick the S3 Compatible storage provider (double click on it). Then
fill it out as noted above.
Did you?It purports to show that the covid "vaccine" killed people, there is nothing >>inDid you download the data?
the included data that appears to be incorrect.
I was intrigued by this: " 9. Nobody seems to want to comment on thisEvidence?
which is consistent with my analysis of the NZ data. The spreadsheet
clearly shows it is those over 60 seeing the excess mortality which
precisely matches the public data:"
The statements in New Zealand appeared to indicate that most at risk
of negative reactions to vaccine were younger people; a lot was made
of two or three fairly sudden deaths of people in the 15 to 25 age
group.
He claims that the data he had shows that there were no Covid deathsIf you have not checked it you have nothing to add.
from 1 August 2022 to 1 November 2022 in New Zealand - I have not
checked that, but it does seem surprising. I am surprised that he has
named the "NZMH whistleblower, Oracle admin Barry Young, who he calls
a "hero", but it is impossible for us to tell whether that data was
correct - two months with no deaths would I have thought would have
been publicised at the time - are you able to explain that, Tony?
So what - he is obviously still very intelligent, are you envious?I respect people who read the data and address it, but if you simply want to >>knock Mr. Kirsch then this is not the place.
Mr Kirsch has clearly been a very intelligent and innovative person -
I had not realised he was one of the two people who independently
invested the first versions of the optical mouse; he has since then
been a very successful business entrepreneur - he and his wife have a >charitable foundation from which by 2007 had given $US75 million to
different causes.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No, they are not simple, and I did not have enough time to undertake
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 20:31:32 -0000 (UTC), TonyOnly to someone who has poor comprehenion or someone like you who generally >attacks the authors or posters.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
What a strange way to start a discussion!I am sick of people who attack the authors and posters of articles that upsethttps://kirschsubstack.com/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new?utm_source=publication-search&utm_medium=email
their beliefs or politics.
Is that the best you can do? Being childishly picky.
This article has a significant amount of data and fact supported by that >>>data.No, the data must be downloaded, and how to do that is explained as
follows in the article:
So did you follow those simple instructions?
That does not answer my question - clearly if you did not download itDid you?
"The repository: Downloading the data and tools from the S3 file
server
The MIT presentation listed above has everything you need including
the credentials to download all the data.
Here are the new credentials:
S3 compatible Server: service.skirsch.com:9003 (as of Jun 23, 2024)
Public API keys:
Access: CpQWGbhGXn52F3hSgdqQ
Secret: bvvitCh5BkyGK2vf3ZllFqjoLfT1G3NgAzejQ1PK
You can only access the data-transparency bucket for now. There’s more
that I’m not disclosing yet (including a new US source other than >>Medicare).
You can use any S3 file browser to download such as CloudBerry
Explorer or CyberDuck or Amazon’s S3 Browser.
Pick the S3 Compatible storage provider (double click on it). Then
fill it out as noted above.
It purports to show that the covid "vaccine" killed people, there is nothing >>>inDid you download the data?
the included data that appears to be incorrect.
Well covered in nz.general at the time.
I was intrigued by this: " 9. Nobody seems to want to comment on this >>which is consistent with my analysis of the NZ data. The spreadsheet >>clearly shows it is those over 60 seeing the excess mortality which >>precisely matches the public data:"
The statements in New Zealand appeared to indicate that most at risk
of negative reactions to vaccine were younger people; a lot was made
of two or three fairly sudden deaths of people in the 15 to 25 age
group.
Evidence?So are you in a position to verify there were no Covid deaths in those
If you have not checked it you have nothing to add.
He claims that the data he had shows that there were no Covid deaths
from 1 August 2022 to 1 November 2022 in New Zealand - I have not
checked that, but it does seem surprising. I am surprised that he has >>named the "NZMH whistleblower, Oracle admin Barry Young, who he calls
a "hero", but it is impossible for us to tell whether that data was
correct - two months with no deaths would I have thought would have
been publicised at the time - are you able to explain that, Tony?
I was not knocking Mr Kirsch; I was seeking information from you,I respect people who read the data and address it, but if you simply want to >>>knock Mr. Kirsch then this is not the place.
Are you trying to knock his reputation, Tony?So what - he is obviously still very intelligent, are you envious?
Mr Kirsch has clearly been a very intelligent and innovative person -
I had not realised he was one of the two people who independently
invested the first versions of the optical mouse; he has since then
been a very successful business entrepreneur - he and his wife have a >>charitable foundation from which by 2007 had given $US75 million to >>different causes.
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 06:15:54 -0000 (UTC), TonyYes it is and they are so si8mple a 5 year old could do it.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No, they are not simple, and I did not have enough time to undertake
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 20:31:32 -0000 (UTC), TonyOnly to someone who has poor comprehenion or someone like you who generally >>attacks the authors or posters.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
What a strange way to start a discussion!I am sick of people who attack the authors and posters of articles that >>>>upsethttps://kirschsubstack.com/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new?utm_source=publication-search&utm_medium=email
their beliefs or politics.
Is that the best you can do? Being childishly picky.
This article has a significant amount of data and fact supported by that >>>>data.No, the data must be downloaded, and how to do that is explained as >>>follows in the article:
So did you follow those simple instructions?
further research. You said the data was in the article; but that is
not the case.
Did you?That does not answer my question - clearly if you did not download itDid you?
"The repository: Downloading the data and tools from the S3 file
server
The MIT presentation listed above has everything you need including
the credentials to download all the data.
Here are the new credentials:
S3 compatible Server: service.skirsch.com:9003 (as of Jun 23, 2024)
Public API keys:
Access: CpQWGbhGXn52F3hSgdqQ
Secret: bvvitCh5BkyGK2vf3ZllFqjoLfT1G3NgAzejQ1PK
You can only access the data-transparency bucket for now. There’s more >>>that I’m not disclosing yet (including a new US source other than >>>Medicare).
You can use any S3 file browser to download such as CloudBerry
Explorer or CyberDuck or Amazon’s S3 Browser.
Pick the S3 Compatible storage provider (double click on it). Then
fill it out as noted above.
It purports to show that the covid "vaccine" killed people, there is >>>>nothingDid you download the data?
in
the included data that appears to be incorrect.
you were not able to check the veracity of the assertions in the
article.
Evidence?Well covered in nz.general at the time.
I was intrigued by this: " 9. Nobody seems to want to comment on this >>>which is consistent with my analysis of the NZ data. The spreadsheet >>>clearly shows it is those over 60 seeing the excess mortality which >>>precisely matches the public data:"
The statements in New Zealand appeared to indicate that most at risk
of negative reactions to vaccine were younger people; a lot was made
of two or three fairly sudden deaths of people in the 15 to 25 age
group.
Liar.Evidence?So are you in a position to verify there were no Covid deaths in those
If you have not checked it you have nothing to add.
He claims that the data he had shows that there were no Covid deaths
from 1 August 2022 to 1 November 2022 in New Zealand - I have not
checked that, but it does seem surprising. I am surprised that he has >>>named the "NZMH whistleblower, Oracle admin Barry Young, who he calls
a "hero", but it is impossible for us to tell whether that data was >>>correct - two months with no deaths would I have thought would have
been publicised at the time - are you able to explain that, Tony?
two months in 2022?
I was not knocking Mr Kirsch; I was seeking information from you,I respect people who read the data and address it, but if you simply want >>>>to
knock Mr. Kirsch then this is not the place.
Tony.
Answer the questions, don't ask stupid ones.Are you trying to knock his reputation, Tony?So what - he is obviously still very intelligent, are you envious?
Mr Kirsch has clearly been a very intelligent and innovative person -
I had not realised he was one of the two people who independently >>>invested the first versions of the optical mouse; he has since then
been a very successful business entrepreneur - he and his wife have a >>>charitable foundation from which by 2007 had given $US75 million to >>>different causes.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Answered above - no I did not, and neither did you . . .
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 06:15:54 -0000 (UTC), TonyYes it is and they are so si8mple a 5 year old could do it.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No, they are not simple, and I did not have enough time to undertake >>further research. You said the data was in the article; but that is
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 20:31:32 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Only to someone who has poor comprehenion or someone like you who generally >>>attacks the authors or posters.
What a strange way to start a discussion!I am sick of people who attack the authors and posters of articles that >>>>>upsethttps://kirschsubstack.com/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new?utm_source=publication-search&utm_medium=email
their beliefs or politics.
Is that the best you can do? Being childishly picky.
This article has a significant amount of data and fact supported by that >>>>>data.No, the data must be downloaded, and how to do that is explained as >>>>follows in the article:
So did you follow those simple instructions?
not the case.
Your pickiness is brerathtaking.
Did you?
That does not answer my question - clearly if you did not download itDid you?
"The repository: Downloading the data and tools from the S3 file
server
The MIT presentation listed above has everything you need including
the credentials to download all the data.
Here are the new credentials:
S3 compatible Server: service.skirsch.com:9003 (as of Jun 23, 2024)
Public API keys:
Access: CpQWGbhGXn52F3hSgdqQ
Secret: bvvitCh5BkyGK2vf3ZllFqjoLfT1G3NgAzejQ1PK
You can only access the data-transparency bucket for now. There’s more >>>>that I’m not disclosing yet (including a new US source other than >>>>Medicare).
You can use any S3 file browser to download such as CloudBerry
Explorer or CyberDuck or Amazon’s S3 Browser.
Pick the S3 Compatible storage provider (double click on it). Then
fill it out as noted above.
It purports to show that the covid "vaccine" killed people, there is >>>>>nothingDid you download the data?
in
the included data that appears to be incorrect.
you were not able to check the veracity of the assertions in the
article.
No answer. You know that is not correct Tony, but are too scared toEvidence?Well covered in nz.general at the time.
I was intrigued by this: " 9. Nobody seems to want to comment on this >>>>which is consistent with my analysis of the NZ data. The spreadsheet >>>>clearly shows it is those over 60 seeing the excess mortality which >>>>precisely matches the public data:"
The statements in New Zealand appeared to indicate that most at risk
of negative reactions to vaccine were younger people; a lot was made
of two or three fairly sudden deaths of people in the 15 to 25 age >>>>group.
Evidence?So are you in a position to verify there were no Covid deaths in those
If you have not checked it you have nothing to add.
He claims that the data he had shows that there were no Covid deaths >>>>from 1 August 2022 to 1 November 2022 in New Zealand - I have not >>>>checked that, but it does seem surprising. I am surprised that he has >>>>named the "NZMH whistleblower, Oracle admin Barry Young, who he calls
a "hero", but it is impossible for us to tell whether that data was >>>>correct - two months with no deaths would I have thought would have >>>>been publicised at the time - are you able to explain that, Tony?
two months in 2022?
No lies, but it is clear that you cannot answer fairly simpleLiar.
I was not knocking Mr Kirsch; I was seeking information from you,I respect people who read the data and address it, but if you simply want >>>>>to
knock Mr. Kirsch then this is not the place.
Tony.
Answer the questions, don't ask stupid ones.Are you trying to knock his reputation, Tony?So what - he is obviously still very intelligent, are you envious?
Mr Kirsch has clearly been a very intelligent and innovative person -
I had not realised he was one of the two people who independently >>>>invested the first versions of the optical mouse; he has since then >>>>been a very successful business entrepreneur - he and his wife have a >>>>charitable foundation from which by 2007 had given $US75 million to >>>>different causes.
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 21:30:23 -0000 (UTC), TonyI am not surprised that you couldn't be bothered trying to get the data. I did succeed however, your lies nothwithstanding.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Answered above - no I did not, and neither did you . . .
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 06:15:54 -0000 (UTC), TonyYes it is and they are so si8mple a 5 year old could do it.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No, they are not simple, and I did not have enough time to undertake >>>further research. You said the data was in the article; but that is
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 20:31:32 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Only to someone who has poor comprehenion or someone like you who generally >>>>attacks the authors or posters.
What a strange way to start a discussion!I am sick of people who attack the authors and posters of articles that >>>>>>upsethttps://kirschsubstack.com/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new?utm_source=publication-search&utm_medium=email
their beliefs or politics.
Is that the best you can do? Being childishly picky.
This article has a significant amount of data and fact supported by that >>>>>>data.No, the data must be downloaded, and how to do that is explained as >>>>>follows in the article:
So did you follow those simple instructions?
not the case.
Your pickiness is brerathtaking.
Did you?
That does not answer my question - clearly if you did not download itDid you?
"The repository: Downloading the data and tools from the S3 file >>>>>server
The MIT presentation listed above has everything you need including >>>>>the credentials to download all the data.
Here are the new credentials:
S3 compatible Server: service.skirsch.com:9003 (as of Jun 23, 2024)
Public API keys:
Access: CpQWGbhGXn52F3hSgdqQ
Secret: bvvitCh5BkyGK2vf3ZllFqjoLfT1G3NgAzejQ1PK
You can only access the data-transparency bucket for now. There’s more >>>>>that I’m not disclosing yet (including a new US source other than >>>>>Medicare).
You can use any S3 file browser to download such as CloudBerry >>>>>Explorer or CyberDuck or Amazon’s S3 Browser.
Pick the S3 Compatible storage provider (double click on it). Then >>>>>fill it out as noted above.
It purports to show that the covid "vaccine" killed people, there is >>>>>>nothingDid you download the data?
in
the included data that appears to be incorrect.
you were not able to check the veracity of the assertions in the
article.
No rtead the article it is all there. The deaths are a matter of record, look it up.No answer. You know that is not correct Tony, but are too scared toEvidence?Well covered in nz.general at the time.
I was intrigued by this: " 9. Nobody seems to want to comment on this >>>>>which is consistent with my analysis of the NZ data. The spreadsheet >>>>>clearly shows it is those over 60 seeing the excess mortality which >>>>>precisely matches the public data:"
The statements in New Zealand appeared to indicate that most at risk >>>>>of negative reactions to vaccine were younger people; a lot was made >>>>>of two or three fairly sudden deaths of people in the 15 to 25 age >>>>>group.
Evidence?So are you in a position to verify there were no Covid deaths in those >>>two months in 2022?
If you have not checked it you have nothing to add.
He claims that the data he had shows that there were no Covid deaths >>>>>from 1 August 2022 to 1 November 2022 in New Zealand - I have not >>>>>checked that, but it does seem surprising. I am surprised that he has >>>>>named the "NZMH whistleblower, Oracle admin Barry Young, who he calls >>>>>a "hero", but it is impossible for us to tell whether that data was >>>>>correct - two months with no deaths would I have thought would have >>>>>been publicised at the time - are you able to explain that, Tony?
confirm it.
So wrong data, wrong conclusions - Right, Tony.Typo corrected, data is fine and readily available, look it up.
There was no cogent question asked. I don't answer impotent questiond.No lies, but it is clear that you cannot answer fairly simpleLiar.
I was not knocking Mr Kirsch; I was seeking information from you,I respect people who read the data and address it, but if you simply want >>>>>>to
knock Mr. Kirsch then this is not the place.
Tony.
questions, Tony.
Answer the questions, don't ask stupid ones.Are you trying to knock his reputation, Tony?So what - he is obviously still very intelligent, are you envious?
Mr Kirsch has clearly been a very intelligent and innovative person - >>>>>I had not realised he was one of the two people who independently >>>>>invested the first versions of the optical mouse; he has since then >>>>>been a very successful business entrepreneur - he and his wife have a >>>>>charitable foundation from which by 2007 had given $US75 million to >>>>>different causes.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 21:30:23 -0000 (UTC), TonyI am not surprised that you couldn't be bothered trying to get the data. I did >succeed however, your lies nothwithstanding.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Answered above - no I did not, and neither did you . . .
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 06:15:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes it is and they are so si8mple a 5 year old could do it.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No, they are not simple, and I did not have enough time to undertake >>>>further research. You said the data was in the article; but that is
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 20:31:32 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Only to someone who has poor comprehenion or someone like you who generally
What a strange way to start a discussion!I am sick of people who attack the authors and posters of articles that >>>>>>>upsethttps://kirschsubstack.com/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new?utm_source=publication-search&utm_medium=email
their beliefs or politics.
attacks the authors or posters.
Is that the best you can do? Being childishly picky.
This article has a significant amount of data and fact supported by that >>>>>>>data.No, the data must be downloaded, and how to do that is explained as >>>>>>follows in the article:
So did you follow those simple instructions?
not the case.
Your pickiness is brerathtaking.
Did you?
That does not answer my question - clearly if you did not download it >>>>you were not able to check the veracity of the assertions in the >>>>article.Did you?
"The repository: Downloading the data and tools from the S3 file >>>>>>server
The MIT presentation listed above has everything you need including >>>>>>the credentials to download all the data.
Here are the new credentials:
S3 compatible Server: service.skirsch.com:9003 (as of Jun 23, 2024) >>>>>>
Public API keys:
Access: CpQWGbhGXn52F3hSgdqQ
Secret: bvvitCh5BkyGK2vf3ZllFqjoLfT1G3NgAzejQ1PK
You can only access the data-transparency bucket for now. There’s more >>>>>>that I’m not disclosing yet (including a new US source other than >>>>>>Medicare).
You can use any S3 file browser to download such as CloudBerry >>>>>>Explorer or CyberDuck or Amazon’s S3 Browser.
Pick the S3 Compatible storage provider (double click on it). Then >>>>>>fill it out as noted above.
It purports to show that the covid "vaccine" killed people, there is >>>>>>>nothingDid you download the data?
in
the included data that appears to be incorrect.
No rtead the article it is all there. The deaths are a matter of record, look >it up.
No answer. You know that is not correct Tony, but are too scared toEvidence?Well covered in nz.general at the time.
I was intrigued by this: " 9. Nobody seems to want to comment on this >>>>>>which is consistent with my analysis of the NZ data. The spreadsheet >>>>>>clearly shows it is those over 60 seeing the excess mortality which >>>>>>precisely matches the public data:"
The statements in New Zealand appeared to indicate that most at risk >>>>>>of negative reactions to vaccine were younger people; a lot was made >>>>>>of two or three fairly sudden deaths of people in the 15 to 25 age >>>>>>group.
Evidence?So are you in a position to verify there were no Covid deaths in those >>>>two months in 2022?
If you have not checked it you have nothing to add.
He claims that the data he had shows that there were no Covid deaths >>>>>>from 1 August 2022 to 1 November 2022 in New Zealand - I have not >>>>>>checked that, but it does seem surprising. I am surprised that he has >>>>>>named the "NZMH whistleblower, Oracle admin Barry Young, who he calls >>>>>>a "hero", but it is impossible for us to tell whether that data was >>>>>>correct - two months with no deaths would I have thought would have >>>>>>been publicised at the time - are you able to explain that, Tony?
confirm it.
Typo corrected, data is fine and readily available, look it up.
So wrong data, wrong conclusions - Right, Tony.
There was no cogent question asked. I don't answer impotent questiond.
No lies, but it is clear that you cannot answer fairly simpleLiar.
I was not knocking Mr Kirsch; I was seeking information from you,I respect people who read the data and address it, but if you simply want
to
knock Mr. Kirsch then this is not the place.
Tony.
questions, Tony.
Answer the questions, don't ask stupid ones.Are you trying to knock his reputation, Tony?So what - he is obviously still very intelligent, are you envious?
Mr Kirsch has clearly been a very intelligent and innovative person - >>>>>>I had not realised he was one of the two people who independently >>>>>>invested the first versions of the optical mouse; he has since then >>>>>>been a very successful business entrepreneur - he and his wife have a >>>>>>charitable foundation from which by 2007 had given $US75 million to >>>>>>different causes.
On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 04:02:46 -0000 (UTC), TonyDo your own research.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 21:30:23 -0000 (UTC), TonyI am not surprised that you couldn't be bothered trying to get the data. I >>did
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Answered above - no I did not, and neither did you . . .
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 06:15:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes it is and they are so si8mple a 5 year old could do it.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No, they are not simple, and I did not have enough time to undertake >>>>>further research. You said the data was in the article; but that is >>>>>not the case.
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 20:31:32 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Only to someone who has poor comprehenion or someone like you who >>>>>>generally
What a strange way to start a discussion!I am sick of people who attack the authors and posters of articles that >>>>>>>>upsethttps://kirschsubstack.com/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new?utm_source=publication-search&utm_medium=email
their beliefs or politics.
attacks the authors or posters.
Is that the best you can do? Being childishly picky.
This article has a significant amount of data and fact supported by >>>>>>>>thatNo, the data must be downloaded, and how to do that is explained as >>>>>>>follows in the article:
data.
So did you follow those simple instructions?
Your pickiness is brerathtaking.
Did you?
That does not answer my question - clearly if you did not download it >>>>>you were not able to check the veracity of the assertions in the >>>>>article.Did you?
"The repository: Downloading the data and tools from the S3 file >>>>>>>server
The MIT presentation listed above has everything you need including >>>>>>>the credentials to download all the data.
Here are the new credentials:
S3 compatible Server: service.skirsch.com:9003 (as of Jun 23, 2024) >>>>>>>
Public API keys:
Access: CpQWGbhGXn52F3hSgdqQ
Secret: bvvitCh5BkyGK2vf3ZllFqjoLfT1G3NgAzejQ1PK
You can only access the data-transparency bucket for now. There’s more >>>>>>>that I’m not disclosing yet (including a new US source other than >>>>>>>Medicare).
You can use any S3 file browser to download such as CloudBerry >>>>>>>Explorer or CyberDuck or Amazon’s S3 Browser.
Pick the S3 Compatible storage provider (double click on it). Then >>>>>>>fill it out as noted above.
It purports to show that the covid "vaccine" killed people, there is >>>>>>>>nothingDid you download the data?
in
the included data that appears to be incorrect.
succeed however, your lies nothwithstanding.
So how many covid deaths were there from 1 August 2022 to 1 November
2022 in New Zealand?
No rtead the article it is all there. The deaths are a matter of record, look >>it up.
No answer. You know that is not correct Tony, but are too scared to >>>confirm it.Evidence?Well covered in nz.general at the time.
I was intrigued by this: " 9. Nobody seems to want to comment on this >>>>>>>which is consistent with my analysis of the NZ data. The spreadsheet >>>>>>>clearly shows it is those over 60 seeing the excess mortality which >>>>>>>precisely matches the public data:"
The statements in New Zealand appeared to indicate that most at risk >>>>>>>of negative reactions to vaccine were younger people; a lot was made >>>>>>>of two or three fairly sudden deaths of people in the 15 to 25 age >>>>>>>group.
Evidence?So are you in a position to verify there were no Covid deaths in those >>>>>two months in 2022?
He claims that the data he had shows that there were no Covid deaths >>>>>>>from 1 August 2022 to 1 November 2022 in New Zealand - I have not >>>>>>>checked that, but it does seem surprising. I am surprised that he has >>>>>>>named the "NZMH whistleblower, Oracle admin Barry Young, who he calls >>>>>>>a "hero", but it is impossible for us to tell whether that data was >>>>>>>correct - two months with no deaths would I have thought would have >>>>>>>been publicised at the time - are you able to explain that, Tony? >>>>>>If you have not checked it you have nothing to add.
Typo corrected, data is fine and readily available, look it up.
So wrong data, wrong conclusions - Right, Tony.
There was no cogent question asked. I don't answer impotent questiond.
No lies, but it is clear that you cannot answer fairly simpleLiar.
I was not knocking Mr Kirsch; I was seeking information from you, >>>>>Tony.I respect people who read the data and address it, but if you simply >>>>>>>>want
to
knock Mr. Kirsch then this is not the place.
questions, Tony.
Answer the questions, don't ask stupid ones.So what - he is obviously still very intelligent, are you envious? >>>>>Are you trying to knock his reputation, Tony?
Mr Kirsch has clearly been a very intelligent and innovative person - >>>>>>>I had not realised he was one of the two people who independently >>>>>>>invested the first versions of the optical mouse; he has since then >>>>>>>been a very successful business entrepreneur - he and his wife have a >>>>>>>charitable foundation from which by 2007 had given $US75 million to >>>>>>>different causes.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:So yo did not download data, or cannot find the deaths in those
On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 04:02:46 -0000 (UTC), TonyDo your own research.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 21:30:23 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:I am not surprised that you couldn't be bothered trying to get the data. I >>>did
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Answered above - no I did not, and neither did you . . .
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 06:15:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes it is and they are so si8mple a 5 year old could do it.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No, they are not simple, and I did not have enough time to undertake >>>>>>further research. You said the data was in the article; but that is >>>>>>not the case.
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 20:31:32 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Only to someone who has poor comprehenion or someone like you who >>>>>>>generally
What a strange way to start a discussion!I am sick of people who attack the authors and posters of articles thathttps://kirschsubstack.com/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new?utm_source=publication-search&utm_medium=email
upset
their beliefs or politics.
attacks the authors or posters.
Is that the best you can do? Being childishly picky.
This article has a significant amount of data and fact supported by >>>>>>>>>thatNo, the data must be downloaded, and how to do that is explained as >>>>>>>>follows in the article:
data.
So did you follow those simple instructions?
Your pickiness is brerathtaking.
Did you?
That does not answer my question - clearly if you did not download it >>>>>>you were not able to check the veracity of the assertions in the >>>>>>article.Did you?
"The repository: Downloading the data and tools from the S3 file >>>>>>>>server
The MIT presentation listed above has everything you need including >>>>>>>>the credentials to download all the data.
Here are the new credentials:
S3 compatible Server: service.skirsch.com:9003 (as of Jun 23, 2024) >>>>>>>>
Public API keys:
Access: CpQWGbhGXn52F3hSgdqQ
Secret: bvvitCh5BkyGK2vf3ZllFqjoLfT1G3NgAzejQ1PK
You can only access the data-transparency bucket for now. There’s more >>>>>>>>that I’m not disclosing yet (including a new US source other than >>>>>>>>Medicare).
You can use any S3 file browser to download such as CloudBerry >>>>>>>>Explorer or CyberDuck or Amazon’s S3 Browser.
Pick the S3 Compatible storage provider (double click on it). Then >>>>>>>>fill it out as noted above.
It purports to show that the covid "vaccine" killed people, there is >>>>>>>>>nothingDid you download the data?
in
the included data that appears to be incorrect.
succeed however, your lies nothwithstanding.
So how many covid deaths were there from 1 August 2022 to 1 November
2022 in New Zealand?
No rtead the article it is all there. The deaths are a matter of record, look
No answer. You know that is not correct Tony, but are too scared to >>>>confirm it.Evidence?Well covered in nz.general at the time.
I was intrigued by this: " 9. Nobody seems to want to comment on this >>>>>>>>which is consistent with my analysis of the NZ data. The spreadsheet >>>>>>>>clearly shows it is those over 60 seeing the excess mortality which >>>>>>>>precisely matches the public data:"
The statements in New Zealand appeared to indicate that most at risk >>>>>>>>of negative reactions to vaccine were younger people; a lot was made >>>>>>>>of two or three fairly sudden deaths of people in the 15 to 25 age >>>>>>>>group.
Evidence?So are you in a position to verify there were no Covid deaths in those >>>>>>two months in 2022?
He claims that the data he had shows that there were no Covid deaths >>>>>>>>from 1 August 2022 to 1 November 2022 in New Zealand - I have not >>>>>>>>checked that, but it does seem surprising. I am surprised that he has >>>>>>>>named the "NZMH whistleblower, Oracle admin Barry Young, who he calls >>>>>>>>a "hero", but it is impossible for us to tell whether that data was >>>>>>>>correct - two months with no deaths would I have thought would have >>>>>>>>been publicised at the time - are you able to explain that, Tony? >>>>>>>If you have not checked it you have nothing to add.
it up.
Typo corrected, data is fine and readily available, look it up.
So wrong data, wrong conclusions - Right, Tony.
There was no cogent question asked. I don't answer impotent questiond.
No lies, but it is clear that you cannot answer fairly simple >>>>questions, Tony.Liar.
I was not knocking Mr Kirsch; I was seeking information from you, >>>>>>Tony.I respect people who read the data and address it, but if you simply >>>>>>>>>want
to
knock Mr. Kirsch then this is not the place.
Answer the questions, don't ask stupid ones.So what - he is obviously still very intelligent, are you envious? >>>>>>Are you trying to knock his reputation, Tony?
Mr Kirsch has clearly been a very intelligent and innovative person - >>>>>>>>I had not realised he was one of the two people who independently >>>>>>>>invested the first versions of the optical mouse; he has since then >>>>>>>>been a very successful business entrepreneur - he and his wife have a >>>>>>>>charitable foundation from which by 2007 had given $US75 million to >>>>>>>>different causes.
On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 07:50:14 -0000 (UTC), TonyCorrect, you have been caught out lying once more. I did download the data. But if you want to know what it says, do your own research and quit your childish abuse.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:So yo did not download data, or cannot find the deaths in those
On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 04:02:46 -0000 (UTC), TonyDo your own research.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 21:30:23 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:I am not surprised that you couldn't be bothered trying to get the data. I >>>>did
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Answered above - no I did not, and neither did you . . .
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 06:15:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes it is and they are so si8mple a 5 year old could do it.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No, they are not simple, and I did not have enough time to undertake >>>>>>>further research. You said the data was in the article; but that is >>>>>>>not the case.
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 20:31:32 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Only to someone who has poor comprehenion or someone like you who >>>>>>>>generally
What a strange way to start a discussion!I am sick of people who attack the authors and posters of articles >>>>>>>>>>thathttps://kirschsubstack.com/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new?utm_source=publication-search&utm_medium=email
upset
their beliefs or politics.
attacks the authors or posters.
Is that the best you can do? Being childishly picky.
This article has a significant amount of data and fact supported by >>>>>>>>>>thatNo, the data must be downloaded, and how to do that is explained as >>>>>>>>>follows in the article:
data.
So did you follow those simple instructions?
Your pickiness is brerathtaking.
Did you?
That does not answer my question - clearly if you did not download it >>>>>>>you were not able to check the veracity of the assertions in the >>>>>>>article.Did you?
"The repository: Downloading the data and tools from the S3 file >>>>>>>>>server
The MIT presentation listed above has everything you need including >>>>>>>>>the credentials to download all the data.
Here are the new credentials:
S3 compatible Server: service.skirsch.com:9003 (as of Jun 23, 2024) >>>>>>>>>
Public API keys:
Access: CpQWGbhGXn52F3hSgdqQ
Secret: bvvitCh5BkyGK2vf3ZllFqjoLfT1G3NgAzejQ1PK
You can only access the data-transparency bucket for now. There’s more >>>>>>>>>that I’m not disclosing yet (including a new US source other than >>>>>>>>>Medicare).
You can use any S3 file browser to download such as CloudBerry >>>>>>>>>Explorer or CyberDuck or Amazon’s S3 Browser.
Pick the S3 Compatible storage provider (double click on it). Then >>>>>>>>>fill it out as noted above.
It purports to show that the covid "vaccine" killed people, there is >>>>>>>>>>nothingDid you download the data?
in
the included data that appears to be incorrect.
succeed however, your lies nothwithstanding.
So how many covid deaths were there from 1 August 2022 to 1 November
2022 in New Zealand?
months. Caught out lying is not a good look, Tony.
No rtead the article it is all there. The deaths are a matter of record, >>>>look
No answer. You know that is not correct Tony, but are too scared to >>>>>confirm it.Evidence?Well covered in nz.general at the time.
I was intrigued by this: " 9. Nobody seems to want to comment on this >>>>>>>>>which is consistent with my analysis of the NZ data. The spreadsheet >>>>>>>>>clearly shows it is those over 60 seeing the excess mortality which >>>>>>>>>precisely matches the public data:"
The statements in New Zealand appeared to indicate that most at risk >>>>>>>>>of negative reactions to vaccine were younger people; a lot was made >>>>>>>>>of two or three fairly sudden deaths of people in the 15 to 25 age >>>>>>>>>group.
Evidence?So are you in a position to verify there were no Covid deaths in those >>>>>>>two months in 2022?
He claims that the data he had shows that there were no Covid deaths >>>>>>>>>from 1 August 2022 to 1 November 2022 in New Zealand - I have not >>>>>>>>>checked that, but it does seem surprising. I am surprised that he has >>>>>>>>>named the "NZMH whistleblower, Oracle admin Barry Young, who he calls >>>>>>>>>a "hero", but it is impossible for us to tell whether that data was >>>>>>>>>correct - two months with no deaths would I have thought would have >>>>>>>>>been publicised at the time - are you able to explain that, Tony? >>>>>>>>If you have not checked it you have nothing to add.
it up.
Typo corrected, data is fine and readily available, look it up.
So wrong data, wrong conclusions - Right, Tony.
There was no cogent question asked. I don't answer impotent questiond. >>>>>
No lies, but it is clear that you cannot answer fairly simple >>>>>questions, Tony.Liar.
I was not knocking Mr Kirsch; I was seeking information from you, >>>>>>>Tony.I respect people who read the data and address it, but if you simply >>>>>>>>>>want
to
knock Mr. Kirsch then this is not the place.
Answer the questions, don't ask stupid ones.So what - he is obviously still very intelligent, are you envious? >>>>>>>Are you trying to knock his reputation, Tony?
Mr Kirsch has clearly been a very intelligent and innovative person - >>>>>>>>>I had not realised he was one of the two people who independently >>>>>>>>>invested the first versions of the optical mouse; he has since then >>>>>>>>>been a very successful business entrepreneur - he and his wife have a >>>>>>>>>charitable foundation from which by 2007 had given $US75 million to >>>>>>>>>different causes.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:OK - see here:
On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 07:50:14 -0000 (UTC), TonyCorrect, you have been caught out lying once more. I did download the data. But
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:So yo did not download data, or cannot find the deaths in those
On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 04:02:46 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Do your own research.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 21:30:23 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:I am not surprised that you couldn't be bothered trying to get the data. I >>>>>did
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Answered above - no I did not, and neither did you . . .
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 06:15:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes it is and they are so si8mple a 5 year old could do it.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No, they are not simple, and I did not have enough time to undertake >>>>>>>>further research. You said the data was in the article; but that is >>>>>>>>not the case.
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 20:31:32 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Only to someone who has poor comprehenion or someone like you who >>>>>>>>>generally
What a strange way to start a discussion!I am sick of people who attack the authors and posters of articles >>>>>>>>>>>thathttps://kirschsubstack.com/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new?utm_source=publication-search&utm_medium=email
upset
their beliefs or politics.
attacks the authors or posters.
Is that the best you can do? Being childishly picky.
This article has a significant amount of data and fact supported by >>>>>>>>>>>thatNo, the data must be downloaded, and how to do that is explained as >>>>>>>>>>follows in the article:
data.
So did you follow those simple instructions?
Your pickiness is brerathtaking.
Did you?
That does not answer my question - clearly if you did not download it >>>>>>>>you were not able to check the veracity of the assertions in the >>>>>>>>article.Did you?
"The repository: Downloading the data and tools from the S3 file >>>>>>>>>>server
The MIT presentation listed above has everything you need including >>>>>>>>>>the credentials to download all the data.
Here are the new credentials:
S3 compatible Server: service.skirsch.com:9003 (as of Jun 23, 2024) >>>>>>>>>>
Public API keys:
Access: CpQWGbhGXn52F3hSgdqQ
Secret: bvvitCh5BkyGK2vf3ZllFqjoLfT1G3NgAzejQ1PK
You can only access the data-transparency bucket for now. There’s more
that I’m not disclosing yet (including a new US source other than >>>>>>>>>>Medicare).
You can use any S3 file browser to download such as CloudBerry >>>>>>>>>>Explorer or CyberDuck or Amazon’s S3 Browser.
Pick the S3 Compatible storage provider (double click on it). Then >>>>>>>>>>fill it out as noted above.
It purports to show that the covid "vaccine" killed people, there is >>>>>>>>>>>nothingDid you download the data?
in
the included data that appears to be incorrect.
succeed however, your lies nothwithstanding.
So how many covid deaths were there from 1 August 2022 to 1 November >>>>2022 in New Zealand?
months. Caught out lying is not a good look, Tony.
if you want to know what it says, do your own research and quit your childish >abuse.
Sometimes even those that are very intelligent can get sidetracked,
No rtead the article it is all there. The deaths are a matter of record, >>>>>look
No answer. You know that is not correct Tony, but are too scared to >>>>>>confirm it.Evidence?Well covered in nz.general at the time.
I was intrigued by this: " 9. Nobody seems to want to comment on this
which is consistent with my analysis of the NZ data. The spreadsheet >>>>>>>>>>clearly shows it is those over 60 seeing the excess mortality which >>>>>>>>>>precisely matches the public data:"
The statements in New Zealand appeared to indicate that most at risk >>>>>>>>>>of negative reactions to vaccine were younger people; a lot was made >>>>>>>>>>of two or three fairly sudden deaths of people in the 15 to 25 age >>>>>>>>>>group.
Evidence?So are you in a position to verify there were no Covid deaths in those >>>>>>>>two months in 2022?
He claims that the data he had shows that there were no Covid deaths >>>>>>>>>>from 1 August 2022 to 1 November 2022 in New Zealand - I have not >>>>>>>>>>checked that, but it does seem surprising. I am surprised that he has
named the "NZMH whistleblower, Oracle admin Barry Young, who he calls >>>>>>>>>>a "hero", but it is impossible for us to tell whether that data was >>>>>>>>>>correct - two months with no deaths would I have thought would have >>>>>>>>>>been publicised at the time - are you able to explain that, Tony? >>>>>>>>>If you have not checked it you have nothing to add.
it up.
Typo corrected, data is fine and readily available, look it up.
So wrong data, wrong conclusions - Right, Tony.
There was no cogent question asked. I don't answer impotent questiond. >>>>>>
No lies, but it is clear that you cannot answer fairly simple >>>>>>questions, Tony.Liar.
I was not knocking Mr Kirsch; I was seeking information from you, >>>>>>>>Tony.I respect people who read the data and address it, but if you simply >>>>>>>>>>>want
to
knock Mr. Kirsch then this is not the place.
Answer the questions, don't ask stupid ones.So what - he is obviously still very intelligent, are you envious? >>>>>>>>Are you trying to knock his reputation, Tony?
Mr Kirsch has clearly been a very intelligent and innovative person - >>>>>>>>>>I had not realised he was one of the two people who independently >>>>>>>>>>invested the first versions of the optical mouse; he has since then >>>>>>>>>>been a very successful business entrepreneur - he and his wife have a >>>>>>>>>>charitable foundation from which by 2007 had given $US75 million to >>>>>>>>>>different causes.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 19:34:02 -0000 (UTC), TonyWell done, it wasn't so hard to do the research was it. Give a man a fish >etc....Eh?
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:OK - see here: >>https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/new-zealand/
On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 07:50:14 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Correct, you have been caught out lying once more. I did download the data. >>>But
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:So yo did not download data, or cannot find the deaths in those
On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 04:02:46 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Do your own research.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 21:30:23 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:I am not surprised that you couldn't be bothered trying to get the data. >>>>>>>I
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Answered above - no I did not, and neither did you . . .
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 06:15:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes it is and they are so si8mple a 5 year old could do it. >>>>>>>>>Your pickiness is brerathtaking.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No, they are not simple, and I did not have enough time to undertake >>>>>>>>>>further research. You said the data was in the article; but that is >>>>>>>>>>not the case.
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 20:31:32 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Only to someone who has poor comprehenion or someone like you who >>>>>>>>>>>generally
What a strange way to start a discussion!I am sick of people who attack the authors and posters of articles >>>>>>>>>>>>>thathttps://kirschsubstack.com/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new?utm_source=publication-search&utm_medium=email
upset
their beliefs or politics.
attacks the authors or posters.
Is that the best you can do? Being childishly picky.
This article has a significant amount of data and fact supported byNo, the data must be downloaded, and how to do that is explained as >>>>>>>>>>>>follows in the article:
that
data.
So did you follow those simple instructions?
Did you?
That does not answer my question - clearly if you did not download it >>>>>>>>>>you were not able to check the veracity of the assertions in the >>>>>>>>>>article.Did you?
"The repository: Downloading the data and tools from the S3 file >>>>>>>>>>>>server
The MIT presentation listed above has everything you need including >>>>>>>>>>>>the credentials to download all the data.
Here are the new credentials:
S3 compatible Server: service.skirsch.com:9003 (as of Jun 23, 2024) >>>>>>>>>>>>
Public API keys:
Access: CpQWGbhGXn52F3hSgdqQ
Secret: bvvitCh5BkyGK2vf3ZllFqjoLfT1G3NgAzejQ1PK
You can only access the data-transparency bucket for now. There’s >>>>>>>>>>>>more
that I’m not disclosing yet (including a new US source other than >>>>>>>>>>>>Medicare).
You can use any S3 file browser to download such as CloudBerry >>>>>>>>>>>>Explorer or CyberDuck or Amazon’s S3 Browser.
Pick the S3 Compatible storage provider (double click on it). Then >>>>>>>>>>>>fill it out as noted above.
It purports to show that the covid "vaccine" killed people, there >>>>>>>>>>>>>isDid you download the data?
nothing
in
the included data that appears to be incorrect.
did
succeed however, your lies nothwithstanding.
So how many covid deaths were there from 1 August 2022 to 1 November >>>>>>2022 in New Zealand?
months. Caught out lying is not a good look, Tony.
if you want to know what it says, do your own research and quit your childish
abuse.
(Daily cases are in a chart, hover over that chart to get daily
figures
and here: >>https://www.tewhatuora.govt.nz/assets/Our-health-system/Data-and-statistics/Covid-19/Covid-trends/COVID-19-Trends-and-Insights-Report-28-October-2022-PDF-2.2-MB.pdf
and from that report (Page 3):
"The 7-day rolling average of reported case rates was 47.0 per 100,000 >>population for the week ending 23 October. This was a 14.5% increase
from the previous week, which was 41.1 per 100,000. Rates were highest
in the 65+ age group (62.8 per 100,000). "
On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 02:22:47 -0000 (UTC), TonyOh you idiotic little amoeba, I admit no such thing. You cannot even understand simple English.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 19:34:02 -0000 (UTC), TonyWell done, it wasn't so hard to do the research was it. Give a man a fish >>etc....Eh?
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:OK - see here: >>>https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/new-zealand/
On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 07:50:14 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Correct, you have been caught out lying once more. I did download the data. >>>>But
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:So yo did not download data, or cannot find the deaths in those >>>>>months. Caught out lying is not a good look, Tony.
On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 04:02:46 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Do your own research.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 21:30:23 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:I am not surprised that you couldn't be bothered trying to get the >>>>>>>>data.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Answered above - no I did not, and neither did you . . .
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 06:15:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes it is and they are so si8mple a 5 year old could do it. >>>>>>>>>>Your pickiness is brerathtaking.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No, they are not simple, and I did not have enough time to undertake >>>>>>>>>>>further research. You said the data was in the article; but that is >>>>>>>>>>>not the case.
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 20:31:32 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Only to someone who has poor comprehenion or someone like you who >>>>>>>>>>>>generally
What a strange way to start a discussion!I am sick of people who attack the authors and posters of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>articleshttps://kirschsubstack.com/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new?utm_source=publication-search&utm_medium=email
that
upset
their beliefs or politics.
attacks the authors or posters.
Is that the best you can do? Being childishly picky.
This article has a significant amount of data and fact supported >>>>>>>>>>>>>>byNo, the data must be downloaded, and how to do that is explained as
that
data.
follows in the article:
So did you follow those simple instructions?
Did you?
That does not answer my question - clearly if you did not download itDid you?
"The repository: Downloading the data and tools from the S3 file >>>>>>>>>>>>>server
The MIT presentation listed above has everything you need including
the credentials to download all the data.
Here are the new credentials:
S3 compatible Server: service.skirsch.com:9003 (as of Jun 23, 2024)
Public API keys:
Access: CpQWGbhGXn52F3hSgdqQ
Secret: bvvitCh5BkyGK2vf3ZllFqjoLfT1G3NgAzejQ1PK
You can only access the data-transparency bucket for now. There’s >>>>>>>>>>>>>more
that I’m not disclosing yet (including a new US source other than >>>>>>>>>>>>>Medicare).
You can use any S3 file browser to download such as CloudBerry >>>>>>>>>>>>>Explorer or CyberDuck or Amazon’s S3 Browser.
Pick the S3 Compatible storage provider (double click on it). Then >>>>>>>>>>>>>fill it out as noted above.
It purports to show that the covid "vaccine" killed people, there >>>>>>>>>>>>>>isDid you download the data?
nothing
in
the included data that appears to be incorrect.
you were not able to check the veracity of the assertions in the >>>>>>>>>>>article.
I
did
succeed however, your lies nothwithstanding.
So how many covid deaths were there from 1 August 2022 to 1 November >>>>>>>2022 in New Zealand?
if you want to know what it says, do your own research and quit your >>>>childish
abuse.
(Daily cases are in a chart, hover over that chart to get daily
figures
and here: >>>https://www.tewhatuora.govt.nz/assets/Our-health-system/Data-and-statistics/Covid-19/Covid-trends/COVID-19-Trends-and-Insights-Report-28-October-2022-PDF-2.2-MB.pdf
and from that report (Page 3):
"The 7-day rolling average of reported case rates was 47.0 per 100,000 >>>population for the week ending 23 October. This was a 14.5% increase
from the previous week, which was 41.1 per 100,000. Rates were highest
in the 65+ age group (62.8 per 100,000). "
So you admit that the Steve Kirsch article was totally wrong in at
least that particular. Well done. The whole article is either rubbish
or very suspect - nothing more needs to be said.
On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 19:34:02 -0000 (UTC), TonyWell done, it wasn't so hard to do the research was it. Give a man a fish etc....Eh?
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:OK - see here:
On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 07:50:14 -0000 (UTC), TonyCorrect, you have been caught out lying once more. I did download the data. >>But
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:So yo did not download data, or cannot find the deaths in those
On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 04:02:46 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Do your own research.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 21:30:23 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:I am not surprised that you couldn't be bothered trying to get the data. >>>>>>I
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Answered above - no I did not, and neither did you . . .
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 06:15:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes it is and they are so si8mple a 5 year old could do it. >>>>>>>>Your pickiness is brerathtaking.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No, they are not simple, and I did not have enough time to undertake >>>>>>>>>further research. You said the data was in the article; but that is >>>>>>>>>not the case.
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 20:31:32 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Only to someone who has poor comprehenion or someone like you who >>>>>>>>>>generally
What a strange way to start a discussion!I am sick of people who attack the authors and posters of articles >>>>>>>>>>>>thathttps://kirschsubstack.com/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new?utm_source=publication-search&utm_medium=email
upset
their beliefs or politics.
attacks the authors or posters.
Is that the best you can do? Being childishly picky.
This article has a significant amount of data and fact supported by >>>>>>>>>>>>thatNo, the data must be downloaded, and how to do that is explained as >>>>>>>>>>>follows in the article:
data.
So did you follow those simple instructions?
Did you?
That does not answer my question - clearly if you did not download it >>>>>>>>>you were not able to check the veracity of the assertions in the >>>>>>>>>article.Did you?
"The repository: Downloading the data and tools from the S3 file >>>>>>>>>>>server
The MIT presentation listed above has everything you need including >>>>>>>>>>>the credentials to download all the data.
Here are the new credentials:
S3 compatible Server: service.skirsch.com:9003 (as of Jun 23, 2024) >>>>>>>>>>>
Public API keys:
Access: CpQWGbhGXn52F3hSgdqQ
Secret: bvvitCh5BkyGK2vf3ZllFqjoLfT1G3NgAzejQ1PK
You can only access the data-transparency bucket for now. There’s >>>>>>>>>>>more
that I’m not disclosing yet (including a new US source other than >>>>>>>>>>>Medicare).
You can use any S3 file browser to download such as CloudBerry >>>>>>>>>>>Explorer or CyberDuck or Amazon’s S3 Browser.
Pick the S3 Compatible storage provider (double click on it). Then >>>>>>>>>>>fill it out as noted above.
It purports to show that the covid "vaccine" killed people, there >>>>>>>>>>>>isDid you download the data?
nothing
in
the included data that appears to be incorrect.
did
succeed however, your lies nothwithstanding.
So how many covid deaths were there from 1 August 2022 to 1 November >>>>>2022 in New Zealand?
months. Caught out lying is not a good look, Tony.
if you want to know what it says, do your own research and quit your childish >>abuse.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/new-zealand/
(Daily cases are in a chart, hover over that chart to get daily
figures
and here: >https://www.tewhatuora.govt.nz/assets/Our-health-system/Data-and-statistics/Covid-19/Covid-trends/COVID-19-Trends-and-Insights-Report-28-October-2022-PDF-2.2-MB.pdf
and from that report (Page 3):
"The 7-day rolling average of reported case rates was 47.0 per 100,000 >population for the week ending 23 October. This was a 14.5% increase
from the previous week, which was 41.1 per 100,000. Rates were highest
in the 65+ age group (62.8 per 100,000). "
So yes the New Zealand results were very good when compared with other >countries, but we did not then have zero cases. Many of the currentNo that is a false conclusion.
cases are "reinfections", and anecdotally many of those are for people
who have not been vaccinated, but that statistic is not reported.
But the main conclusion is that in at least one important fact, the
results for New Zealand in the article by Steve Kirsch are wrong.
TheYou miss the point as always. And deliberately.
first clue should have been "Leaked data from Health New Zealand" in
the title of the article - why use leaked data when official
statistics, trusted by the World Health Organisation, are readily
available?
Secondly do a bit of research on the author:Meaningless - you do love to attack those who you disagree with.
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Kirsch
Now Wikipedia gives references for a lot of their statements - pick aNah. Just more of your attacks.
few and have a read - for example this one: >https://thehub.ca/2022/01/03/harry-rakowski-misinformation-is-rife-but-dont-reject-all-alternative-covid-19-treatments/
There are other articles about Steve Kirsch of course: >https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/10/05/1036408/silicon-valley-millionaire-steve-kirsch-covid-vaccine-misinformation/As above.
Or pointless as in this case.Sometimes even those that are very intelligent can get sidetracked,
No rtead the article it is all there. The deaths are a matter of record, >>>>>>look
No answer. You know that is not correct Tony, but are too scared to >>>>>>>confirm it.Evidence?Well covered in nz.general at the time.
I was intrigued by this: " 9. Nobody seems to want to comment on >>>>>>>>>>>this
which is consistent with my analysis of the NZ data. The spreadsheet >>>>>>>>>>>clearly shows it is those over 60 seeing the excess mortality which >>>>>>>>>>>precisely matches the public data:"
The statements in New Zealand appeared to indicate that most at risk >>>>>>>>>>>of negative reactions to vaccine were younger people; a lot was made >>>>>>>>>>>of two or three fairly sudden deaths of people in the 15 to 25 age >>>>>>>>>>>group.
Evidence?So are you in a position to verify there were no Covid deaths in those >>>>>>>>>two months in 2022?
He claims that the data he had shows that there were no Covid deaths >>>>>>>>>>>from 1 August 2022 to 1 November 2022 in New Zealand - I have not >>>>>>>>>>>checked that, but it does seem surprising. I am surprised that he >>>>>>>>>>>has
named the "NZMH whistleblower, Oracle admin Barry Young, who he calls
a "hero", but it is impossible for us to tell whether that data was >>>>>>>>>>>correct - two months with no deaths would I have thought would have >>>>>>>>>>>been publicised at the time - are you able to explain that, Tony? >>>>>>>>>>If you have not checked it you have nothing to add.
it up.
Typo corrected, data is fine and readily available, look it up.
So wrong data, wrong conclusions - Right, Tony.
There was no cogent question asked. I don't answer impotent questiond. >>>>>>>
No lies, but it is clear that you cannot answer fairly simple >>>>>>>questions, Tony.Liar.
I was not knocking Mr Kirsch; I was seeking information from you, >>>>>>>>>Tony.I respect people who read the data and address it, but if you >>>>>>>>>>>>simply
want
to
knock Mr. Kirsch then this is not the place.
Answer the questions, don't ask stupid ones.So what - he is obviously still very intelligent, are you envious? >>>>>>>>>Are you trying to knock his reputation, Tony?
Mr Kirsch has clearly been a very intelligent and innovative person -
I had not realised he was one of the two people who independently >>>>>>>>>>>invested the first versions of the optical mouse; he has since then >>>>>>>>>>>been a very successful business entrepreneur - he and his wife have a
charitable foundation from which by 2007 had given $US75 million to >>>>>>>>>>>different causes.
Tony - looking up references for people you would like to believe can
be worthwhile.
On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 03:04:54 -0000 (UTC), TonyYes I agree, you should do better next time when you get the real data. However, conclusions are quite beyond you.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 02:22:47 -0000 (UTC), TonyOh you idiotic little amoeba, I admit no such thing. You cannot even >>understand
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 19:34:02 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Well done, it wasn't so hard to do the research was it. Give a man a fish >>>>etc....Eh?
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:OK - see here: >>>>>https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/new-zealand/
On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 07:50:14 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Correct, you have been caught out lying once more. I did download the >>>>>>data.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:So yo did not download data, or cannot find the deaths in those >>>>>>>months. Caught out lying is not a good look, Tony.
On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 04:02:46 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Do your own research.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 21:30:23 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:I am not surprised that you couldn't be bothered trying to get the >>>>>>>>>>data.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Answered above - no I did not, and neither did you . . .
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 06:15:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes it is and they are so si8mple a 5 year old could do it. >>>>>>>>>>>>Your pickiness is brerathtaking.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No, they are not simple, and I did not have enough time to >>>>>>>>>>>>>undertake
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 20:31:32 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Only to someone who has poor comprehenion or someone like you who >>>>>>>>>>>>>>generally
What a strange way to start a discussion!I am sick of people who attack the authors and posters of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>articleshttps://kirschsubstack.com/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new?utm_source=publication-search&utm_medium=email
that
upset
their beliefs or politics.
attacks the authors or posters.
Is that the best you can do? Being childishly picky. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>So did you follow those simple instructions?
This article has a significant amount of data and fact >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>supportedNo, the data must be downloaded, and how to do that is explained >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>as
by
that
data.
follows in the article:
further research. You said the data was in the article; but that is
not the case.
Did you?
That does not answer my question - clearly if you did not download >>>>>>>>>>>>>itDid you?
"The repository: Downloading the data and tools from the S3 file >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>server
The MIT presentation listed above has everything you need >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>including
the credentials to download all the data.
Here are the new credentials:
S3 compatible Server: service.skirsch.com:9003 (as of Jun 23, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>2024)
Public API keys:
Access: CpQWGbhGXn52F3hSgdqQ
Secret: bvvitCh5BkyGK2vf3ZllFqjoLfT1G3NgAzejQ1PK
You can only access the data-transparency bucket for now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>There’s
more
that I’m not disclosing yet (including a new US source other than
Medicare).
You can use any S3 file browser to download such as CloudBerry >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Explorer or CyberDuck or Amazon’s S3 Browser.
Pick the S3 Compatible storage provider (double click on it). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Then
fill it out as noted above.
It purports to show that the covid "vaccine" killed people, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>there
is
nothing
in
the included data that appears to be incorrect. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Did you download the data?
you were not able to check the veracity of the assertions in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>article.
I
did
succeed however, your lies nothwithstanding.
So how many covid deaths were there from 1 August 2022 to 1 November >>>>>>>>>2022 in New Zealand?
But
if you want to know what it says, do your own research and quit your >>>>>>childish
abuse.
(Daily cases are in a chart, hover over that chart to get daily >>>>>figures
and here: >>>>>https://www.tewhatuora.govt.nz/assets/Our-health-system/Data-and-statistics/Covid-19/Covid-trends/COVID-19-Trends-and-Insights-Report-28-October-2022-PDF-2.2-MB.pdf
and from that report (Page 3):
"The 7-day rolling average of reported case rates was 47.0 per 100,000 >>>>>population for the week ending 23 October. This was a 14.5% increase >>>>>from the previous week, which was 41.1 per 100,000. Rates were highest >>>>>in the 65+ age group (62.8 per 100,000). "
So you admit that the Steve Kirsch article was totally wrong in at
least that particular. Well done. The whole article is either rubbish
or very suspect - nothing more needs to be said.
simple English.
I note you removed the explanation I made of your failure, no surprise there. >>You are a coward.
What a waste your life really is.
Kirsch is correct and you have failed to show any doubt about that.
Wrong data, wrong conclusions.
I guess you feel most at home in thatNo idea, never been there. You however would know the feeling.
situation Tony . . .
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 02:22:47 -0000 (UTC), TonyOh you idiotic little amoeba, I admit no such thing. You cannot even understand
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 19:34:02 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Well done, it wasn't so hard to do the research was it. Give a man a fish >>>etc....Eh?
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:OK - see here: >>>>https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/new-zealand/
On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 07:50:14 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Correct, you have been caught out lying once more. I did download the data.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:So yo did not download data, or cannot find the deaths in those >>>>>>months. Caught out lying is not a good look, Tony.
On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 04:02:46 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Do your own research.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 21:30:23 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:I am not surprised that you couldn't be bothered trying to get the >>>>>>>>>data.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Answered above - no I did not, and neither did you . . .
On Sat, 14 Sep 2024 06:15:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes it is and they are so si8mple a 5 year old could do it. >>>>>>>>>>>Your pickiness is brerathtaking.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No, they are not simple, and I did not have enough time to undertake
On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 20:31:32 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Only to someone who has poor comprehenion or someone like you who >>>>>>>>>>>>>generally
What a strange way to start a discussion!I am sick of people who attack the authors and posters of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>articleshttps://kirschsubstack.com/p/data-from-us-medicare-and-the-new?utm_source=publication-search&utm_medium=email
that
upset
their beliefs or politics.
attacks the authors or posters.
Is that the best you can do? Being childishly picky. >>>>>>>>>>>>>So did you follow those simple instructions?
This article has a significant amount of data and fact supported >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>byNo, the data must be downloaded, and how to do that is explained as
that
data.
follows in the article:
further research. You said the data was in the article; but that is >>>>>>>>>>>>not the case.
Did you?
That does not answer my question - clearly if you did not download itDid you?
"The repository: Downloading the data and tools from the S3 file >>>>>>>>>>>>>>server
The MIT presentation listed above has everything you need including
the credentials to download all the data.
Here are the new credentials:
S3 compatible Server: service.skirsch.com:9003 (as of Jun 23, 2024)
Public API keys:
Access: CpQWGbhGXn52F3hSgdqQ
Secret: bvvitCh5BkyGK2vf3ZllFqjoLfT1G3NgAzejQ1PK
You can only access the data-transparency bucket for now. There’s >>>>>>>>>>>>>>more
that I’m not disclosing yet (including a new US source other than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Medicare).
You can use any S3 file browser to download such as CloudBerry >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Explorer or CyberDuck or Amazon’s S3 Browser.
Pick the S3 Compatible storage provider (double click on it). Then
fill it out as noted above.
It purports to show that the covid "vaccine" killed people, there
is
nothing
in
the included data that appears to be incorrect. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Did you download the data?
you were not able to check the veracity of the assertions in the >>>>>>>>>>>>article.
I
did
succeed however, your lies nothwithstanding.
So how many covid deaths were there from 1 August 2022 to 1 November >>>>>>>>2022 in New Zealand?
But
if you want to know what it says, do your own research and quit your >>>>>childish
abuse.
(Daily cases are in a chart, hover over that chart to get daily
figures
and here: >>>>https://www.tewhatuora.govt.nz/assets/Our-health-system/Data-and-statistics/Covid-19/Covid-trends/COVID-19-Trends-and-Insights-Report-28-October-2022-PDF-2.2-MB.pdf
and from that report (Page 3):
"The 7-day rolling average of reported case rates was 47.0 per 100,000 >>>>population for the week ending 23 October. This was a 14.5% increase >>>>from the previous week, which was 41.1 per 100,000. Rates were highest >>>>in the 65+ age group (62.8 per 100,000). "
So you admit that the Steve Kirsch article was totally wrong in at
least that particular. Well done. The whole article is either rubbish
or very suspect - nothing more needs to be said.
simple English.
I note you removed the explanation I made of your failure, no surprise there. >You are a coward.
What a waste your life really is.
Kirsch is correct and you have failed to show any doubt about that.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 11:01:51 |
| Calls: | 10,387 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,060 |
| Messages: | 6,416,692 |