• Implausible Deniability

    From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Thu Sep 19 02:50:35 2024
    You have to wonder about a Government Minister stupid enough to accept important policy advice from random unknown sources. Or maybe she’s
    not stupid, and knows exactly where the advice came from? Namely,
    industry lobbyists operating on behalf of well-known ruthless,
    profit-driven multinationals with nothing resembling a moral compass
    at all?

    <https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/chief-ombudsman-peter-boshier-criticises-associate-health-minister-casey-costello-over-withholding-tobacco-documents/2PHU7NLNJBCCNMAH3C7JXVQAM4/>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 3 05:57:53 2024
    On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 02:50:35 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:

    You have to wonder about a Government Minister stupid enough to accept important policy advice from random unknown sources. Or maybe she’s not stupid, and knows exactly where the advice came from? Namely,
    industry lobbyists operating on behalf of well-known ruthless,
    profit-driven multinationals with nothing resembling a moral compass at
    all?

    More on that score, this time the Minister is trying to back up her
    decision on dropping the tax on heated-tobacco products, by quoting
    some research reports <https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/10/03/costello-releases-independent-advice-on-heated-tobacco-decisions/>.

    What are the problems with this? First of all, the only source of
    these products in NZ is Philip Morris. And too many of those research
    papers turn out to be authored by people connected to--you guessed
    it--Philip Morris. Either that, or they are just plain irrelevant to
    the issue (e.g. talking about smoked tobacco rather than heated
    tobacco) or don’t say what the Minister seems to think they say.

    No way Casey Costello could have any connection to Philip Morris,
    could she? Absolutely, positively, nothing whatsoever to suggest that
    at all ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Thu Oct 3 08:09:11 2024
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 02:50:35 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:

    You have to wonder about a Government Minister stupid enough to accept
    important policy advice from random unknown sources. Or maybe she’s not
    stupid, and knows exactly where the advice came from? Namely,
    industry lobbyists operating on behalf of well-known ruthless,
    profit-driven multinationals with nothing resembling a moral compass at
    all?

    More on that score, this time the Minister is trying to back up her
    decision on dropping the tax on heated-tobacco products, by quoting
    some research reports ><https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/10/03/costello-releases-independent-advice-on-heated-tobacco-decisions/>.

    What are the problems with this? First of all, the only source of
    these products in NZ is Philip Morris. And too many of those research
    papers turn out to be authored by people connected to--you guessed
    it--Philip Morris. Either that, or they are just plain irrelevant to
    the issue (e.g. talking about smoked tobacco rather than heated
    tobacco) or don’t say what the Minister seems to think they say.

    No way Casey Costello could have any connection to Philip Morris,
    could she? Absolutely, positively, nothing whatsoever to suggest that
    at all ...
    Well at the least not very likely.
    Wow you are a nasty little man. When you fail with poor logic, and that is common, you start more defamatory posts.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Thu Oct 3 21:58:29 2024
    On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:09:11 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 02:50:35 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:

    You have to wonder about a Government Minister stupid enough to accept
    important policy advice from random unknown sources. Or maybe she’s not >>> stupid, and knows exactly where the advice came from? Namely,
    industry lobbyists operating on behalf of well-known ruthless,
    profit-driven multinationals with nothing resembling a moral compass at
    all?

    More on that score, this time the Minister is trying to back up her >>decision on dropping the tax on heated-tobacco products, by quoting
    some research reports >><https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/10/03/costello-releases-independent-advice-on-heated-tobacco-decisions/>.

    What are the problems with this? First of all, the only source of
    these products in NZ is Philip Morris. And too many of those research >>papers turn out to be authored by people connected to--you guessed >>it--Philip Morris. Either that, or they are just plain irrelevant to
    the issue (e.g. talking about smoked tobacco rather than heated
    tobacco) or don’t say what the Minister seems to think they say.

    No way Casey Costello could have any connection to Philip Morris,
    could she? Absolutely, positively, nothing whatsoever to suggest that
    at all ...
    Well at the least not very likely.
    Wow you are a nasty little man. When you fail with poor logic, and that is >common, you start more defamatory posts.

    Don't worry, Tony, yes calling another poster a "nasty little man"
    could be considered defamatory, but anyone trying to sue you on those
    grounds would be advised to read more of your posts - a defence of
    cognitive impairment would probably be enough to see you "Right."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to ldo@nz.invalid on Thu Oct 3 21:41:33 2024
    On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 05:57:53 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
    <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 02:50:35 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:

    You have to wonder about a Government Minister stupid enough to accept
    important policy advice from random unknown sources. Or maybe she’s not
    stupid, and knows exactly where the advice came from? Namely,
    industry lobbyists operating on behalf of well-known ruthless,
    profit-driven multinationals with nothing resembling a moral compass at
    all?

    More on that score, this time the Minister is trying to back up her
    decision on dropping the tax on heated-tobacco products, by quoting
    some research reports ><https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/10/03/costello-releases-independent-advice-on-heated-tobacco-decisions/>.

    What are the problems with this? First of all, the only source of
    these products in NZ is Philip Morris. And too many of those research
    papers turn out to be authored by people connected to--you guessed
    it--Philip Morris. Either that, or they are just plain irrelevant to
    the issue (e.g. talking about smoked tobacco rather than heated
    tobacco) or don’t say what the Minister seems to think they say.

    No way Casey Costello could have any connection to Philip Morris,
    could she? Absolutely, positively, nothing whatsoever to suggest that
    at all ...

    Its been a good week for Luxon - making an extra $70,000 out of a
    property sale by fulfilling a promise to owners of multiple dwellings
    to extend the period of exemption from tax on capital gains - he was
    clever to wait two weeks to settle so that some people may have
    thought the proximity was just a coincidence. And now the opportunity
    to tell the country that through a handy little regulation that had
    been extended back in March, Philip Morris has to modify their heated
    tobacco products before they can be legally sold after 1 October (it
    seems some retailers had not got the message, but perhaps it was not promulgated widely - both Luxon and Willis looked very happy at the
    implication that this made the whole debacle "Right" - especially as
    it limits the value of the tax break until the product gets changed;
    but quite possibly for this not having been picked up by Seymour's new
    Ministry of Regulations - perhaps they haven't yet been told what to
    do by their Minister . . . Hanging out Costello for not having been
    aware was clearly some compensation for Cabinet having no power over
    her or NZ First. Besides, isn't it very likely that Casey Costello did
    get good independent advice? - from the Atlas Network through the NZ
    Taxpayers Union?

    Some of the media have not been as kind: https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/350438196/resign-growing-calls-casey-costello-lose-portfolios-over-heated-tobacco-products

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/350438196/resign-growing-calls-casey-costello-lose-portfolios-over-heated-tobacco-products

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Thu Oct 3 19:30:15 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 08:09:11 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 02:50:35 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:

    You have to wonder about a Government Minister stupid enough to accept >>>> important policy advice from random unknown sources. Or maybe she’s not >>>> stupid, and knows exactly where the advice came from? Namely,
    industry lobbyists operating on behalf of well-known ruthless,
    profit-driven multinationals with nothing resembling a moral compass at >>>> all?

    More on that score, this time the Minister is trying to back up her >>>decision on dropping the tax on heated-tobacco products, by quoting
    some research reports >>><https://www.1news.co.nz/2024/10/03/costello-releases-independent-advice-on-heated-tobacco-decisions/>.

    What are the problems with this? First of all, the only source of
    these products in NZ is Philip Morris. And too many of those research >>>papers turn out to be authored by people connected to--you guessed >>>it--Philip Morris. Either that, or they are just plain irrelevant to
    the issue (e.g. talking about smoked tobacco rather than heated
    tobacco) or don’t say what the Minister seems to think they say.

    No way Casey Costello could have any connection to Philip Morris,
    could she? Absolutely, positively, nothing whatsoever to suggest that
    at all ...
    Well at the least not very likely.
    Wow you are a nasty little man. When you fail with poor logic, and that is >>common, you start more defamatory posts.

    Don't worry, Tony, yes calling another poster a "nasty little man"
    could be considered defamatory
    No it cannot. Your understanding of defamation laws is akin to your understanding of truth - zero!
    , but anyone trying to sue you on those
    grounds would be advised to read more of your posts - a defence of
    cognitive impairment would probably be enough to see you "Right."
    Ah, but you see That is actually defamatory - you cannot win. Your response to Lawrence in this thread was also defamatory.
    You are a hopeless silly little man. (No defamation there either)_.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)