With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both Stuff andRNZ is a blatantly pro left organisation and is anti this government for that reason alone.
rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and analysis. As the >article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, changing the
types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously hard-news
website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social media-based >articles."
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/rnzs-online-surge-could-start-to-worry-private-media/What rubbish; all RNZ wants is the opportunity to interviews, which traditionally will ask some hard questions but will also give an
RNZ is a blatantly pro left organisation and is anti this government for that >reason alone.
With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both Stuff and >>rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and analysis. As the >>article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, changing the
types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously hard-news
website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social media-based >>articles."
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:03:54 -0000 (UTC), TonyNot rubbish at all. You have always chose RNZ as a source because it follows your lost cause.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/rnzs-online-surge-could-start-to-worry-private-media/What rubbish; all RNZ wants is the opportunity to interviews, which >traditionally will ask some hard questions but will also give an
RNZ is a blatantly pro left organisation and is anti this government for that >>reason alone.
With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both Stuff and >>>rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and analysis. As the >>>article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, changing the
types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously hard-news >>>website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social media-based >>>articles."
opportunity for a politician to say what he also wants to say. They
appear to be only prepared to answer questions that they like - try
listening to Media Watch - they do not see RNZ as at all biased - they
will ask hard questions of all politicians as well as the easy ones.
After all, did not Christopher Luxon say that his government would
govern for the benefit of all New Zealanders?
https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/rnzs-online-surge-could-start-to-worry-private-media/
With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both Stuff and
rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and analysis. As the >article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, changing the
types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously hard-news
website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social media-based >articles."
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:03:54 -0000 (UTC), TonyNot rubbish at all. You have always chose RNZ as a source because it follows your lost cause.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/rnzs-online-surge-could-start-to-worry-private-media/What rubbish; all RNZ wants is the opportunity to interviews, which >>traditionally will ask some hard questions but will also give an >>opportunity for a politician to say what he also wants to say. They
RNZ is a blatantly pro left organisation and is anti this government for that
With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both Stuff and >>>>rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and analysis. As the >>>>article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, changing the >>>>types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously hard-news >>>>website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social media-based >>>>articles."
reason alone.
appear to be only prepared to answer questions that they like - try >>listening to Media Watch - they do not see RNZ as at all biased - they
will ask hard questions of all politicians as well as the easy ones.
After all, did not Christopher Luxon say that his government would
govern for the benefit of all New Zealanders?
The last PM refused interviews many times, no surprise really considering she had no credentials.
Luxon merely wants balance, unlike you.
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:49:54 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/rnzs-online-surge-could-start-to-worry-private-media/
With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both Stuff and >>rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and analysis. As the >>article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, changing the
types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously hard-news
website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social media-based >>articles."
A posted a day or 2 ago on RNZ 'fairness':
https://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2024/09/30_one_sided_stories.html
In the context of this thread, an example of bias is laid bare.
On 2024-09-20, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes that is correct. If anything the PM is bending over backwards to be fair to Maori as he should, pity there is no acknowledgement of that from the racist Maori whpo want superior rights to the rest of NZ.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:03:54 -0000 (UTC), TonyNot rubbish at all. You have always chose RNZ as a source because it follows >> your lost cause.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/rnzs-online-surge-could-start-to-worry-private-media/What rubbish; all RNZ wants is the opportunity to interviews, which >>>traditionally will ask some hard questions but will also give an >>>opportunity for a politician to say what he also wants to say. They >>>appear to be only prepared to answer questions that they like - try >>>listening to Media Watch - they do not see RNZ as at all biased - they >>>will ask hard questions of all politicians as well as the easy ones. >>>After all, did not Christopher Luxon say that his government would
RNZ is a blatantly pro left organisation and is anti this government for >>>>that
With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both Stuff and >>>>>rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and analysis. As the >>>>>article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, changing the >>>>>types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously hard-news >>>>>website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social media-based >>>>>articles."
reason alone.
govern for the benefit of all New Zealanders?
The last PM refused interviews many times, no surprise really considering >>she
had no credentials.
Luxon merely wants balance, unlike you.
Balance comes when you consider the wishes of all of the people of the >country you are Governing.
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2024-09-20, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes that is correct. If anything the PM is bending over backwards to be fair to
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:03:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Not rubbish at all. You have always chose RNZ as a source because it follows
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/rnzs-online-surge-could-start-to-worry-private-media/What rubbish; all RNZ wants is the opportunity to interviews, which >>>>traditionally will ask some hard questions but will also give an >>>>opportunity for a politician to say what he also wants to say. They >>>>appear to be only prepared to answer questions that they like - try >>>>listening to Media Watch - they do not see RNZ as at all biased - they >>>>will ask hard questions of all politicians as well as the easy ones. >>>>After all, did not Christopher Luxon say that his government would >>>>govern for the benefit of all New Zealanders?
RNZ is a blatantly pro left organisation and is anti this government for >>>>>that
With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both Stuff and >>>>>>rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and analysis. As the >>>>>>article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, changing the >>>>>>types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously hard-news >>>>>>website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social media-based >>>>>>articles."
reason alone.
your lost cause.
The last PM refused interviews many times, no surprise really considering >>>she
had no credentials.
Luxon merely wants balance, unlike you.
Balance comes when you consider the wishes of all of the people of the >>country you are Governing.
Maori as he should, pity there is no acknowledgement of that from the racist >Maori whpo want superior rights to the rest of NZ.
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 08:56:05 -0000 (UTC), TonyThere is no contract at risk. You are lying.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2024-09-20, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes that is correct. If anything the PM is bending over backwards to be fair >>to
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:03:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Not rubbish at all. You have always chose RNZ as a source because it >>>>follows
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/rnzs-online-surge-could-start-to-worry-private-media/What rubbish; all RNZ wants is the opportunity to interviews, which >>>>>traditionally will ask some hard questions but will also give an >>>>>opportunity for a politician to say what he also wants to say. They >>>>>appear to be only prepared to answer questions that they like - try >>>>>listening to Media Watch - they do not see RNZ as at all biased - they >>>>>will ask hard questions of all politicians as well as the easy ones. >>>>>After all, did not Christopher Luxon say that his government would >>>>>govern for the benefit of all New Zealanders?
RNZ is a blatantly pro left organisation and is anti this government for >>>>>>that
With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both Stuff and >>>>>>>rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and analysis. As the >>>>>>>article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, changing the >>>>>>>types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously hard-news >>>>>>>website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social media-based >>>>>>>articles."
reason alone.
your lost cause.
The last PM refused interviews many times, no surprise really considering >>>>she
had no credentials.
Luxon merely wants balance, unlike you.
Balance comes when you consider the wishes of all of the people of the >>>country you are Governing.
Maori as he should, pity there is no acknowledgement of that from the racist >>Maori whpo want superior rights to the rest of NZ.
Things like sanctity of contract
- except that is just what NActFirstThey do not wish to discard anything that Maori are entitlled to. You are lying.
are wanting to discard for Maori
- and the Courts appear to believeThen they should represent those thoughts to government and not make decisions that are well outside their province.
there are issues that need to be investigated first.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 08:56:05 -0000 (UTC), TonyThere is no contract at risk. You are lying.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2024-09-20, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes that is correct. If anything the PM is bending over backwards to be fair >>>to
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:03:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Not rubbish at all. You have always chose RNZ as a source because it >>>>>follows
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/rnzs-online-surge-could-start-to-worry-private-media/What rubbish; all RNZ wants is the opportunity to interviews, which >>>>>>traditionally will ask some hard questions but will also give an >>>>>>opportunity for a politician to say what he also wants to say. They >>>>>>appear to be only prepared to answer questions that they like - try >>>>>>listening to Media Watch - they do not see RNZ as at all biased - they >>>>>>will ask hard questions of all politicians as well as the easy ones. >>>>>>After all, did not Christopher Luxon say that his government would >>>>>>govern for the benefit of all New Zealanders?
RNZ is a blatantly pro left organisation and is anti this government for >>>>>>>that
With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both Stuff and >>>>>>>>rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and analysis. As the >>>>>>>>article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, changing the >>>>>>>>types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously hard-news >>>>>>>>website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social media-based >>>>>>>>articles."
reason alone.
your lost cause.
The last PM refused interviews many times, no surprise really considering >>>>>she
had no credentials.
Luxon merely wants balance, unlike you.
Balance comes when you consider the wishes of all of the people of the >>>>country you are Governing.
Maori as he should, pity there is no acknowledgement of that from the racist >>>Maori whpo want superior rights to the rest of NZ.
Things like sanctity of contract
- except that is just what NActFirstThey do not wish to discard anything that Maori are entitlled to. You are lying.
are wanting to discard for Maori
- and the Courts appear to believeThen they should represent those thoughts to government and not make decisions >that are well outside their province.
there are issues that need to be investigated first.
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 10:50:12 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:49:54 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/rnzs-online-surge-could-start-to-worry-private-media/
With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both Stuff and >>>rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and analysis. As the >>>article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, changing the
types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously hard-news >>>website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social media-based >>>articles."
A posted a day or 2 ago on RNZ 'fairness':
https://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2024/09/30_one_sided_stories.html
In the context of this thread, an example of bias is laid bare.
by this comment it may be a hugely one-sided reader . .
"I have not checked all the stories out, but hugely one-sided
reporting if true."
So who is behind "NZ Media Watch"?
See: https://x.com/nz_media_watch and
https://nzmediawatch.com/ and
https://nzmediawatch.com/about-nz-media-watch.pdf
Gosh what a surprise that the NZ Taxpayer Union gets featured, as well
as harking back to Kelly-Jay Keen.
I haven't bothered searching further, but this looks as though it may
be another vehicle for Peter Williams, (Last time I looked he seemed
to have disappeared from "The Centrist" or its earlier incarnation . .
.
so thanks for the warning, Crash, it certainly appears that there may
have been quite a bit of bias, just not from RNZ . . .
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 20:28:13 -0000 (UTC), TonyI want nothing of the sort.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 08:56:05 -0000 (UTC), TonyThere is no contract at risk. You are lying.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2024-09-20, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes that is correct. If anything the PM is bending over backwards to be >>>>fair
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:03:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Not rubbish at all. You have always chose RNZ as a source because it >>>>>>follows
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/rnzs-online-surge-could-start-to-worry-private-media/What rubbish; all RNZ wants is the opportunity to interviews, which >>>>>>>traditionally will ask some hard questions but will also give an >>>>>>>opportunity for a politician to say what he also wants to say. They >>>>>>>appear to be only prepared to answer questions that they like - try >>>>>>>listening to Media Watch - they do not see RNZ as at all biased - they >>>>>>>will ask hard questions of all politicians as well as the easy ones. >>>>>>>After all, did not Christopher Luxon say that his government would >>>>>>>govern for the benefit of all New Zealanders?
RNZ is a blatantly pro left organisation and is anti this government >>>>>>>>for
With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both Stuff and >>>>>>>>>rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and analysis. As the >>>>>>>>>article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, changing the >>>>>>>>>types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously hard-news >>>>>>>>>website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social media-based >>>>>>>>>articles."
that
reason alone.
your lost cause.
The last PM refused interviews many times, no surprise really >>>>>>considering
she
had no credentials.
Luxon merely wants balance, unlike you.
Balance comes when you consider the wishes of all of the people of the >>>>>country you are Governing.
to
Maori as he should, pity there is no acknowledgement of that from the >>>>racist
Maori whpo want superior rights to the rest of NZ.
Things like sanctity of contract
- except that is just what NActFirstThey do not wish to discard anything that Maori are entitlled to. You are >>lying.
are wanting to discard for Maori
- and the Courts appear to believeThen they should represent those thoughts to government and not make >>decisions
there are issues that need to be investigated first.
that are well outside their province.
A case has been brought before the court - they must deal with it, but
you want them to ask the government what verdict they want before
hearing the case? Do you want them to salute the Fuehrer when they
ask?
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 20:28:13 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 08:56:05 -0000 (UTC), TonyThere is no contract at risk. You are lying.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2024-09-20, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes that is correct. If anything the PM is bending over backwards to be fair
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:03:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Not rubbish at all. You have always chose RNZ as a source because it >>>>>>follows
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/rnzs-online-surge-could-start-to-worry-private-media/What rubbish; all RNZ wants is the opportunity to interviews, which >>>>>>>traditionally will ask some hard questions but will also give an >>>>>>>opportunity for a politician to say what he also wants to say. They >>>>>>>appear to be only prepared to answer questions that they like - try >>>>>>>listening to Media Watch - they do not see RNZ as at all biased - they >>>>>>>will ask hard questions of all politicians as well as the easy ones. >>>>>>>After all, did not Christopher Luxon say that his government would >>>>>>>govern for the benefit of all New Zealanders?
RNZ is a blatantly pro left organisation and is anti this government for
With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both Stuff and >>>>>>>>>rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and analysis. As the >>>>>>>>>article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, changing the >>>>>>>>>types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously hard-news >>>>>>>>>website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social media-based >>>>>>>>>articles."
that
reason alone.
your lost cause.
The last PM refused interviews many times, no surprise really considering
she
had no credentials.
Luxon merely wants balance, unlike you.
Balance comes when you consider the wishes of all of the people of the >>>>>country you are Governing.
to
Maori as he should, pity there is no acknowledgement of that from the racist
Maori whpo want superior rights to the rest of NZ.
Things like sanctity of contract
- except that is just what NActFirstThey do not wish to discard anything that Maori are entitlled to. You are lying.
are wanting to discard for Maori
- and the Courts appear to believeThen they should represent those thoughts to government and not make decisions
there are issues that need to be investigated first.
that are well outside their province.
A case has been brought before the court - they must deal with it,
but
you want them to ask the government what verdict they want before
hearing the case? Do you want them to salute the Fuehrer when they
ask?
https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/rnzs-online-surge-could-start-to-worry-private-media/
With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both Stuff and
rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and analysis. As the >article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, changing the
types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously hard-news
website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social media-based >articles."
On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 08:35:20 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 20:28:13 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 08:56:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:There is no contract at risk. You are lying.
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2024-09-20, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes that is correct. If anything the PM is bending over backwards to be fair
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:03:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Not rubbish at all. You have always chose RNZ as a source because it >>>>>>>follows
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/rnzs-online-surge-could-start-to-worry-private-media/What rubbish; all RNZ wants is the opportunity to interviews, which >>>>>>>>traditionally will ask some hard questions but will also give an >>>>>>>>opportunity for a politician to say what he also wants to say. They >>>>>>>>appear to be only prepared to answer questions that they like - try >>>>>>>>listening to Media Watch - they do not see RNZ as at all biased - they >>>>>>>>will ask hard questions of all politicians as well as the easy ones. >>>>>>>>After all, did not Christopher Luxon say that his government would >>>>>>>>govern for the benefit of all New Zealanders?
RNZ is a blatantly pro left organisation and is anti this government for
With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both Stuff and >>>>>>>>>>rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and analysis. As the
article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, changing the >>>>>>>>>>types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously hard-news >>>>>>>>>>website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social media-based >>>>>>>>>>articles."
that
reason alone.
your lost cause.
The last PM refused interviews many times, no surprise really considering
she
had no credentials.
Luxon merely wants balance, unlike you.
Balance comes when you consider the wishes of all of the people of the >>>>>>country you are Governing.
to
Maori as he should, pity there is no acknowledgement of that from the racist
Maori whpo want superior rights to the rest of NZ.
Things like sanctity of contract
- except that is just what NActFirstThey do not wish to discard anything that Maori are entitlled to. You are lying.
are wanting to discard for Maori
- and the Courts appear to believeThen they should represent those thoughts to government and not make decisions
there are issues that need to be investigated first.
that are well outside their province.
A case has been brought before the court - they must deal with it,
Correct.
but
you want them to ask the government what verdict they want before
hearing the case? Do you want them to salute the Fuehrer when they
ask?
What utter, irrational nonsense.
On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 11:48:54 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>In that case why did you write it, at least you have now retracted the nonsense you wrote.
wrote:
On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 08:35:20 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 20:28:13 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 08:56:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:There is no contract at risk. You are lying.
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2024-09-20, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes that is correct. If anything the PM is bending over backwards to be >>>>>>fair
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:03:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Not rubbish at all. You have always chose RNZ as a source because it >>>>>>>>follows
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/rnzs-online-surge-could-start-to-worry-private-media/What rubbish; all RNZ wants is the opportunity to interviews, which >>>>>>>>>traditionally will ask some hard questions but will also give an >>>>>>>>>opportunity for a politician to say what he also wants to say. They >>>>>>>>>appear to be only prepared to answer questions that they like - try >>>>>>>>>listening to Media Watch - they do not see RNZ as at all biased - they >>>>>>>>>will ask hard questions of all politicians as well as the easy ones. >>>>>>>>>After all, did not Christopher Luxon say that his government would >>>>>>>>>govern for the benefit of all New Zealanders?
RNZ is a blatantly pro left organisation and is anti this government >>>>>>>>>>for
With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both Stuff and >>>>>>>>>>>rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and analysis. As >>>>>>>>>>>the
article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, changing the >>>>>>>>>>>types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously hard-news >>>>>>>>>>>website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social media-based >>>>>>>>>>>articles."
that
reason alone.
your lost cause.
The last PM refused interviews many times, no surprise really >>>>>>>>considering
she
had no credentials.
Luxon merely wants balance, unlike you.
Balance comes when you consider the wishes of all of the people of the >>>>>>>country you are Governing.
to
Maori as he should, pity there is no acknowledgement of that from the >>>>>>racist
Maori whpo want superior rights to the rest of NZ.
Things like sanctity of contract
- except that is just what NActFirstThey do not wish to discard anything that Maori are entitlled to. You are >>>>lying.
are wanting to discard for Maori
- and the Courts appear to believeThen they should represent those thoughts to government and not make >>>>decisions
there are issues that need to be investigated first.
that are well outside their province.
A case has been brought before the court - they must deal with it,
Correct.
but
you want them to ask the government what verdict they want before
hearing the case? Do you want them to salute the Fuehrer when they
ask?
What utter, irrational nonsense.
I agree, Crash
- suggesting that the Courts either would or even worse
should put the wishes of government ahead of the law as it currently
stands and evidence before the Court is an obscene suggestion from a
poster that clearly does not understand the rule of law.
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 21:47:41 -0000 (UTC), TonyAbsolute garbage. You are so wrong that you deserve to be laughed at. Having said that, your comments are consitent with your Marxist mantra.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 20:28:13 -0000 (UTC), TonyI want nothing of the sort.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 08:56:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:There is no contract at risk. You are lying.
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2024-09-20, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes that is correct. If anything the PM is bending over backwards to be >>>>>>fair
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:03:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Not rubbish at all. You have always chose RNZ as a source because it >>>>>>>>follows
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/rnzs-online-surge-could-start-to-worry-private-media/What rubbish; all RNZ wants is the opportunity to interviews, which >>>>>>>>>traditionally will ask some hard questions but will also give an >>>>>>>>>opportunity for a politician to say what he also wants to say. They >>>>>>>>>appear to be only prepared to answer questions that they like - try >>>>>>>>>listening to Media Watch - they do not see RNZ as at all biased - they >>>>>>>>>will ask hard questions of all politicians as well as the easy ones. >>>>>>>>>After all, did not Christopher Luxon say that his government would >>>>>>>>>govern for the benefit of all New Zealanders?
RNZ is a blatantly pro left organisation and is anti this government >>>>>>>>>>for
With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both Stuff and >>>>>>>>>>>rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and analysis. As >>>>>>>>>>>the
article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, changing the >>>>>>>>>>>types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously hard-news >>>>>>>>>>>website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social media-based >>>>>>>>>>>articles."
that
reason alone.
your lost cause.
The last PM refused interviews many times, no surprise really >>>>>>>>considering
she
had no credentials.
Luxon merely wants balance, unlike you.
Balance comes when you consider the wishes of all of the people of the >>>>>>>country you are Governing.
to
Maori as he should, pity there is no acknowledgement of that from the >>>>>>racist
Maori whpo want superior rights to the rest of NZ.
Things like sanctity of contract
- except that is just what NActFirstThey do not wish to discard anything that Maori are entitlled to. You are >>>>lying.
are wanting to discard for Maori
- and the Courts appear to believeThen they should represent those thoughts to government and not make >>>>decisions
there are issues that need to be investigated first.
that are well outside their province.
A case has been brought before the court - they must deal with it, but >>>you want them to ask the government what verdict they want before
hearing the case? Do you want them to salute the Fuehrer when they
ask?
Your abuse becomes worse when you are idiotically wrong as in this case.
Go away little boy and grow a brain.
The courts are to do the bidding of government. Period, there is no room for >>debate on that otherwise you are opposed to democracy and justice. Come to >>think of it, that is what you are isn't it?
You are wrong - the Court will listen to government representatives in >respect of cases where they are represented, but they will base
decisions on both evidence and laws that have been passed by
parliament - whenever that was. You are correct that Maori have taken
a case in relation to their interests arising from actions of the
government, but the "bidding of government" will depend on its success
on the merits of their case. Understand?
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 20:28:13 -0000 (UTC), TonyI want nothing of the sort.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 08:56:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:There is no contract at risk. You are lying.
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2024-09-20, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes that is correct. If anything the PM is bending over backwards to be >>>>>fair
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:03:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Not rubbish at all. You have always chose RNZ as a source because it >>>>>>>follows
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/rnzs-online-surge-could-start-to-worry-private-media/What rubbish; all RNZ wants is the opportunity to interviews, which >>>>>>>>traditionally will ask some hard questions but will also give an >>>>>>>>opportunity for a politician to say what he also wants to say. They >>>>>>>>appear to be only prepared to answer questions that they like - try >>>>>>>>listening to Media Watch - they do not see RNZ as at all biased - they >>>>>>>>will ask hard questions of all politicians as well as the easy ones. >>>>>>>>After all, did not Christopher Luxon say that his government would >>>>>>>>govern for the benefit of all New Zealanders?
RNZ is a blatantly pro left organisation and is anti this government >>>>>>>>>for
With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both Stuff and >>>>>>>>>>rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and analysis. As the
article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, changing the >>>>>>>>>>types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously hard-news >>>>>>>>>>website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social media-based >>>>>>>>>>articles."
that
reason alone.
your lost cause.
The last PM refused interviews many times, no surprise really >>>>>>>considering
she
had no credentials.
Luxon merely wants balance, unlike you.
Balance comes when you consider the wishes of all of the people of the >>>>>>country you are Governing.
to
Maori as he should, pity there is no acknowledgement of that from the >>>>>racist
Maori whpo want superior rights to the rest of NZ.
Things like sanctity of contract
- except that is just what NActFirstThey do not wish to discard anything that Maori are entitlled to. You are >>>lying.
are wanting to discard for Maori
- and the Courts appear to believeThen they should represent those thoughts to government and not make >>>decisions
there are issues that need to be investigated first.
that are well outside their province.
A case has been brought before the court - they must deal with it, but
you want them to ask the government what verdict they want before
hearing the case? Do you want them to salute the Fuehrer when they
ask?
Your abuse becomes worse when you are idiotically wrong as in this case.
Go away little boy and grow a brain.
The courts are to do the bidding of government. Period, there is no room for >debate on that otherwise you are opposed to democracy and justice. Come to >think of it, that is what you are isn't it?
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 21:47:41 -0000 (UTC), TonyAbsolute garbage. You are so wrong that you deserve to be laughed at. Having >said that, your comments are consitent with your Marxist mantra. https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/supreme-court-orders-govt-to-pay-in-advance-for-maori-coastline-appeal/
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 20:28:13 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:I want nothing of the sort.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 08:56:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:There is no contract at risk. You are lying.
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2024-09-20, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes that is correct. If anything the PM is bending over backwards to be >>>>>>>fair
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:03:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Not rubbish at all. You have always chose RNZ as a source because it >>>>>>>>>follows
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/rnzs-online-surge-could-start-to-worry-private-media/What rubbish; all RNZ wants is the opportunity to interviews, which >>>>>>>>>>traditionally will ask some hard questions but will also give an >>>>>>>>>>opportunity for a politician to say what he also wants to say. They >>>>>>>>>>appear to be only prepared to answer questions that they like - try >>>>>>>>>>listening to Media Watch - they do not see RNZ as at all biased - they
RNZ is a blatantly pro left organisation and is anti this government >>>>>>>>>>>for
With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both Stuff and >>>>>>>>>>>>rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and analysis. As >>>>>>>>>>>>the
article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, changing the >>>>>>>>>>>>types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously hard-news >>>>>>>>>>>>website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social media-based >>>>>>>>>>>>articles."
that
reason alone.
will ask hard questions of all politicians as well as the easy ones. >>>>>>>>>>After all, did not Christopher Luxon say that his government would >>>>>>>>>>govern for the benefit of all New Zealanders?
your lost cause.
The last PM refused interviews many times, no surprise really >>>>>>>>>considering
she
had no credentials.
Luxon merely wants balance, unlike you.
Balance comes when you consider the wishes of all of the people of the >>>>>>>>country you are Governing.
to
Maori as he should, pity there is no acknowledgement of that from the >>>>>>>racist
Maori whpo want superior rights to the rest of NZ.
Things like sanctity of contract
- except that is just what NActFirstThey do not wish to discard anything that Maori are entitlled to. You are >>>>>lying.
are wanting to discard for Maori
- and the Courts appear to believeThen they should represent those thoughts to government and not make >>>>>decisions
there are issues that need to be investigated first.
that are well outside their province.
A case has been brought before the court - they must deal with it, but >>>>you want them to ask the government what verdict they want before >>>>hearing the case? Do you want them to salute the Fuehrer when they
ask?
Your abuse becomes worse when you are idiotically wrong as in this case. >>>Go away little boy and grow a brain.
The courts are to do the bidding of government. Period, there is no room for >>>debate on that otherwise you are opposed to democracy and justice. Come to >>>think of it, that is what you are isn't it?
You are wrong - the Court will listen to government representatives in >>respect of cases where they are represented, but they will base
decisions on both evidence and laws that have been passed by
parliament - whenever that was. You are correct that Maori have taken
a case in relation to their interests arising from actions of the >>government, but the "bidding of government" will depend on its success
on the merits of their case. Understand?
On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 08:14:26 -0000 (UTC), TonyNonsense. You are so wrong that you are now invested in the lie.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 21:47:41 -0000 (UTC), TonyAbsolute garbage. You are so wrong that you deserve to be laughed at. Having >>said that, your comments are consitent with your Marxist mantra. >https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/supreme-court-orders-govt-to-pay-in-advance-for-maori-coastline-appeal/
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 20:28:13 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:I want nothing of the sort.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 08:56:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:There is no contract at risk. You are lying.
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2024-09-20, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes that is correct. If anything the PM is bending over backwards to be >>>>>>>>fair
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:03:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Not rubbish at all. You have always chose RNZ as a source because it >>>>>>>>>>follows
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/rnzs-online-surge-could-start-to-worry-private-media/What rubbish; all RNZ wants is the opportunity to interviews, which >>>>>>>>>>>traditionally will ask some hard questions but will also give an >>>>>>>>>>>opportunity for a politician to say what he also wants to say. They >>>>>>>>>>>appear to be only prepared to answer questions that they like - try >>>>>>>>>>>listening to Media Watch - they do not see RNZ as at all biased - >>>>>>>>>>>they
RNZ is a blatantly pro left organisation and is anti this >>>>>>>>>>>>government
With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both Stuff and >>>>>>>>>>>>>rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and analysis. As >>>>>>>>>>>>>the
article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, changing the >>>>>>>>>>>>>types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously hard-news
website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social media-based
articles."
for
that
reason alone.
will ask hard questions of all politicians as well as the easy ones. >>>>>>>>>>>After all, did not Christopher Luxon say that his government would >>>>>>>>>>>govern for the benefit of all New Zealanders?
your lost cause.
The last PM refused interviews many times, no surprise really >>>>>>>>>>considering
she
had no credentials.
Luxon merely wants balance, unlike you.
Balance comes when you consider the wishes of all of the people of the >>>>>>>>>country you are Governing.
to
Maori as he should, pity there is no acknowledgement of that from the >>>>>>>>racist
Maori whpo want superior rights to the rest of NZ.
Things like sanctity of contract
- except that is just what NActFirstThey do not wish to discard anything that Maori are entitlled to. You are >>>>>>lying.
are wanting to discard for Maori
- and the Courts appear to believeThen they should represent those thoughts to government and not make >>>>>>decisions
there are issues that need to be investigated first.
that are well outside their province.
A case has been brought before the court - they must deal with it, but >>>>>you want them to ask the government what verdict they want before >>>>>hearing the case? Do you want them to salute the Fuehrer when they >>>>>ask?
Your abuse becomes worse when you are idiotically wrong as in this case. >>>>Go away little boy and grow a brain.
The courts are to do the bidding of government. Period, there is no room >>>>for
debate on that otherwise you are opposed to democracy and justice. Come to >>>>think of it, that is what you are isn't it?
You are wrong - the Court will listen to government representatives in >>>respect of cases where they are represented, but they will base
decisions on both evidence and laws that have been passed by
parliament - whenever that was. You are correct that Maori have taken
a case in relation to their interests arising from actions of the >>>government, but the "bidding of government" will depend on its success
on the merits of their case. Understand?
It would is perhaps be better for the government to win a court case
on its merits than through deliberately withdrawing funding to force
the other side to withdraw . . .
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 08:14:26 -0000 (UTC), TonyNonsense. You are so wrong that you are now invested in the lie.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 21:47:41 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Absolute garbage. You are so wrong that you deserve to be laughed at. Having >>>said that, your comments are consitent with your Marxist mantra. >>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/supreme-court-orders-govt-to-pay-in-advance-for-maori-coastline-appeal/
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 20:28:13 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:I want nothing of the sort.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 08:56:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:There is no contract at risk. You are lying.
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2024-09-20, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes that is correct. If anything the PM is bending over backwards to be
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:03:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Not rubbish at all. You have always chose RNZ as a source because it
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/rnzs-online-surge-could-start-to-worry-private-media/What rubbish; all RNZ wants is the opportunity to interviews, which >>>>>>>>>>>>traditionally will ask some hard questions but will also give an >>>>>>>>>>>>opportunity for a politician to say what he also wants to say. They >>>>>>>>>>>>appear to be only prepared to answer questions that they like - try >>>>>>>>>>>>listening to Media Watch - they do not see RNZ as at all biased - >>>>>>>>>>>>they
RNZ is a blatantly pro left organisation and is anti this >>>>>>>>>>>>>government
With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both Stuff and
rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and analysis. As
the
article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, changing the
types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously hard-news
website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social media-based
articles."
for
that
reason alone.
will ask hard questions of all politicians as well as the easy ones.
After all, did not Christopher Luxon say that his government would >>>>>>>>>>>>govern for the benefit of all New Zealanders?
follows
your lost cause.
The last PM refused interviews many times, no surprise really >>>>>>>>>>>considering
she
had no credentials.
Luxon merely wants balance, unlike you.
Balance comes when you consider the wishes of all of the people of the
country you are Governing.
fair
to
Maori as he should, pity there is no acknowledgement of that from the >>>>>>>>>racist
Maori whpo want superior rights to the rest of NZ.
Things like sanctity of contract
- except that is just what NActFirstThey do not wish to discard anything that Maori are entitlled to. You are
are wanting to discard for Maori
lying.
- and the Courts appear to believeThen they should represent those thoughts to government and not make >>>>>>>decisions
there are issues that need to be investigated first.
that are well outside their province.
A case has been brought before the court - they must deal with it, but >>>>>>you want them to ask the government what verdict they want before >>>>>>hearing the case? Do you want them to salute the Fuehrer when they >>>>>>ask?
Your abuse becomes worse when you are idiotically wrong as in this case. >>>>>Go away little boy and grow a brain.
The courts are to do the bidding of government. Period, there is no room >>>>>for
debate on that otherwise you are opposed to democracy and justice. Come to >>>>>think of it, that is what you are isn't it?
You are wrong - the Court will listen to government representatives in >>>>respect of cases where they are represented, but they will base >>>>decisions on both evidence and laws that have been passed by
parliament - whenever that was. You are correct that Maori have taken >>>>a case in relation to their interests arising from actions of the >>>>government, but the "bidding of government" will depend on its success >>>>on the merits of their case. Understand?
It would is perhaps be better for the government to win a court case
on its merits than through deliberately withdrawing funding to force
the other side to withdraw . . .
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:You have not demonstrated any lie from me Tony, - the people in the
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 01:43:01 -0000 (UTC), TonyAbuse removed.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 08:14:26 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Nonsense. You are so wrong that you are now invested in the lie.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 21:47:41 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Absolute garbage. You are so wrong that you deserve to be laughed at. >>>>>Having
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 20:28:13 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:I want nothing of the sort.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 08:56:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:There is no contract at risk. You are lying.
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2024-09-20, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes that is correct. If anything the PM is bending over backwards to >>>>>>>>>>>be
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:03:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Not rubbish at all. You have always chose RNZ as a source because >>>>>>>>>>>>>it
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/rnzs-online-surge-could-start-to-worry-private-media/What rubbish; all RNZ wants is the opportunity to interviews, which
RNZ is a blatantly pro left organisation and is anti this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>government
With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both Stuff >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and
rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and analysis. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>As
the
article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, changing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the
types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>hard-news
website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>media-based
articles."
for
that
reason alone.
traditionally will ask some hard questions but will also give an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>opportunity for a politician to say what he also wants to say. They
appear to be only prepared to answer questions that they like - try
listening to Media Watch - they do not see RNZ as at all biased - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>they
will ask hard questions of all politicians as well as the easy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>ones.
After all, did not Christopher Luxon say that his government would
govern for the benefit of all New Zealanders?
follows
your lost cause.
The last PM refused interviews many times, no surprise really >>>>>>>>>>>>>considering
she
had no credentials.
Luxon merely wants balance, unlike you.
Balance comes when you consider the wishes of all of the people of >>>>>>>>>>>>the
country you are Governing.
fair
to
Maori as he should, pity there is no acknowledgement of that from the
racist
Maori whpo want superior rights to the rest of NZ.
Things like sanctity of contract
- except that is just what NActFirstThey do not wish to discard anything that Maori are entitlled to. You >>>>>>>>>are
are wanting to discard for Maori
lying.
- and the Courts appear to believeThen they should represent those thoughts to government and not make >>>>>>>>>decisions
there are issues that need to be investigated first.
that are well outside their province.
A case has been brought before the court - they must deal with it, but >>>>>>>>you want them to ask the government what verdict they want before >>>>>>>>hearing the case? Do you want them to salute the Fuehrer when they >>>>>>>>ask?
Your abuse becomes worse when you are idiotically wrong as in this case. >>>>>>>Go away little boy and grow a brain.
The courts are to do the bidding of government. Period, there is no room >>>>>>>for
debate on that otherwise you are opposed to democracy and justice. Come >>>>>>>to
think of it, that is what you are isn't it?
You are wrong - the Court will listen to government representatives in >>>>>>respect of cases where they are represented, but they will base >>>>>>decisions on both evidence and laws that have been passed by >>>>>>parliament - whenever that was. You are correct that Maori have taken >>>>>>a case in relation to their interests arising from actions of the >>>>>>government, but the "bidding of government" will depend on its success >>>>>>on the merits of their case. Understand?
said that, your comments are consitent with your Marxist mantra. >>>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/supreme-court-orders-govt-to-pay-in-advance-for-maori-coastline-appeal/
It would is perhaps be better for the government to win a court case
on its merits than through deliberately withdrawing funding to force >>>>the other side to withdraw . . .
Once more Rich resports to abuse when his lies are pointed out. Shame on him. >Childishness is Rich's only strength.
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 01:43:01 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 08:14:26 -0000 (UTC), TonyNonsense. You are so wrong that you are now invested in the lie.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 21:47:41 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Absolute garbage. You are so wrong that you deserve to be laughed at. >>>>Having
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 20:28:13 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:I want nothing of the sort.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 08:56:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:There is no contract at risk. You are lying.
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2024-09-20, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Yes that is correct. If anything the PM is bending over backwards to >>>>>>>>>>be
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:03:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Not rubbish at all. You have always chose RNZ as a source because >>>>>>>>>>>>it
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/rnzs-online-surge-could-start-to-worry-private-media/What rubbish; all RNZ wants is the opportunity to interviews, which
RNZ is a blatantly pro left organisation and is anti this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>government
With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both Stuff >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and
rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and analysis. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>As
the
article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, changing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the
types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>hard-news
website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>media-based
articles."
for
that
reason alone.
traditionally will ask some hard questions but will also give an >>>>>>>>>>>>>opportunity for a politician to say what he also wants to say. They
appear to be only prepared to answer questions that they like - try
listening to Media Watch - they do not see RNZ as at all biased - >>>>>>>>>>>>>they
will ask hard questions of all politicians as well as the easy >>>>>>>>>>>>>ones.
After all, did not Christopher Luxon say that his government would >>>>>>>>>>>>>govern for the benefit of all New Zealanders?
follows
your lost cause.
The last PM refused interviews many times, no surprise really >>>>>>>>>>>>considering
she
had no credentials.
Luxon merely wants balance, unlike you.
Balance comes when you consider the wishes of all of the people of >>>>>>>>>>>the
country you are Governing.
fair
to
Maori as he should, pity there is no acknowledgement of that from the >>>>>>>>>>racist
Maori whpo want superior rights to the rest of NZ.
Things like sanctity of contract
- except that is just what NActFirstThey do not wish to discard anything that Maori are entitlled to. You >>>>>>>>are
are wanting to discard for Maori
lying.
- and the Courts appear to believeThen they should represent those thoughts to government and not make >>>>>>>>decisions
there are issues that need to be investigated first.
that are well outside their province.
A case has been brought before the court - they must deal with it, but >>>>>>>you want them to ask the government what verdict they want before >>>>>>>hearing the case? Do you want them to salute the Fuehrer when they >>>>>>>ask?
Your abuse becomes worse when you are idiotically wrong as in this case. >>>>>>Go away little boy and grow a brain.
The courts are to do the bidding of government. Period, there is no room >>>>>>for
debate on that otherwise you are opposed to democracy and justice. Come >>>>>>to
think of it, that is what you are isn't it?
You are wrong - the Court will listen to government representatives in >>>>>respect of cases where they are represented, but they will base >>>>>decisions on both evidence and laws that have been passed by >>>>>parliament - whenever that was. You are correct that Maori have taken >>>>>a case in relation to their interests arising from actions of the >>>>>government, but the "bidding of government" will depend on its success >>>>>on the merits of their case. Understand?
said that, your comments are consitent with your Marxist mantra. >>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/supreme-court-orders-govt-to-pay-in-advance-for-maori-coastline-appeal/
It would is perhaps be better for the government to win a court case
on its merits than through deliberately withdrawing funding to force
the other side to withdraw . . .
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 03:58:27 -0000 (UTC), TonyYes I have. You simply use more and more sarcasm, the refuge of the inept and illiterate.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:You have not demonstrated any lie from me Tony,
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 01:43:01 -0000 (UTC), TonyAbuse removed.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 08:14:26 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Nonsense. You are so wrong that you are now invested in the lie.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 21:47:41 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Absolute garbage. You are so wrong that you deserve to be laughed at. >>>>>>Having
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 20:28:13 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:I want nothing of the sort.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 08:56:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:There is no contract at risk. You are lying.
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2024-09-20, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Yes that is correct. If anything the PM is bending over backwards >>>>>>>>>>>>to
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:03:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Not rubbish at all. You have always chose RNZ as a source >>>>>>>>>>>>>>because
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/rnzs-online-surge-could-start-to-worry-private-media/What rubbish; all RNZ wants is the opportunity to interviews, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>which
RNZ is a blatantly pro left organisation and is anti this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>government
With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both Stuff >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and
rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>analysis.
As
the
article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, changing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the
types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>hard-news
website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>media-based
articles."
for
that
reason alone.
traditionally will ask some hard questions but will also give an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>opportunity for a politician to say what he also wants to say. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>They
appear to be only prepared to answer questions that they like - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>try
listening to Media Watch - they do not see RNZ as at all biased >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>-
they
will ask hard questions of all politicians as well as the easy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ones.
After all, did not Christopher Luxon say that his government >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>would
govern for the benefit of all New Zealanders?
it
follows
your lost cause.
The last PM refused interviews many times, no surprise really >>>>>>>>>>>>>>considering
she
had no credentials.
Luxon merely wants balance, unlike you.
Balance comes when you consider the wishes of all of the people of >>>>>>>>>>>>>the
country you are Governing.
be
fair
to
Maori as he should, pity there is no acknowledgement of that from >>>>>>>>>>>>the
racist
Maori whpo want superior rights to the rest of NZ.
Things like sanctity of contract
- except that is just what NActFirstThey do not wish to discard anything that Maori are entitlled to. You >>>>>>>>>>are
are wanting to discard for Maori
lying.
- and the Courts appear to believeThen they should represent those thoughts to government and not make >>>>>>>>>>decisions
there are issues that need to be investigated first.
that are well outside their province.
A case has been brought before the court - they must deal with it, but >>>>>>>>>you want them to ask the government what verdict they want before >>>>>>>>>hearing the case? Do you want them to salute the Fuehrer when they >>>>>>>>>ask?
Your abuse becomes worse when you are idiotically wrong as in this case.
Go away little boy and grow a brain.
The courts are to do the bidding of government. Period, there is no >>>>>>>>room
for
debate on that otherwise you are opposed to democracy and justice. Come >>>>>>>>to
think of it, that is what you are isn't it?
You are wrong - the Court will listen to government representatives in >>>>>>>respect of cases where they are represented, but they will base >>>>>>>decisions on both evidence and laws that have been passed by >>>>>>>parliament - whenever that was. You are correct that Maori have taken >>>>>>>a case in relation to their interests arising from actions of the >>>>>>>government, but the "bidding of government" will depend on its success >>>>>>>on the merits of their case. Understand?
said that, your comments are consitent with your Marxist mantra. >>>>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/supreme-court-orders-govt-to-pay-in-advance-for-maori-coastline-appeal/
It would is perhaps be better for the government to win a court case >>>>>on its merits than through deliberately withdrawing funding to force >>>>>the other side to withdraw . . .
Once more Rich resports to abuse when his lies are pointed out. Shame on him. >>Childishness is Rich's only strength.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 03:58:27 -0000 (UTC), TonyYes I have. You simply use more and more sarcasm, the refuge of the inept and >illiterate.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:You have not demonstrated any lie from me Tony,
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 01:43:01 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Abuse removed.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 08:14:26 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Nonsense. You are so wrong that you are now invested in the lie.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 21:47:41 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Absolute garbage. You are so wrong that you deserve to be laughed at. >>>>>>>Having
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 20:28:13 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:I want nothing of the sort.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 08:56:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:There is no contract at risk. You are lying.
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2024-09-20, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Yes that is correct. If anything the PM is bending over backwards >>>>>>>>>>>>>to
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:03:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Not rubbish at all. You have always chose RNZ as a source >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>because
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/rnzs-online-surge-could-start-to-worry-private-media/What rubbish; all RNZ wants is the opportunity to interviews, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>which
RNZ is a blatantly pro left organisation and is anti this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>government
With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both Stuff
and
rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>analysis.
As
the
article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, changing
the
types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>hard-news
website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>media-based
articles."
for
that
reason alone.
traditionally will ask some hard questions but will also give an
opportunity for a politician to say what he also wants to say. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>They
appear to be only prepared to answer questions that they like - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>try
listening to Media Watch - they do not see RNZ as at all biased >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>-
they
will ask hard questions of all politicians as well as the easy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ones.
After all, did not Christopher Luxon say that his government >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>would
govern for the benefit of all New Zealanders?
it
follows
your lost cause.
The last PM refused interviews many times, no surprise really >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>considering
she
had no credentials.
Luxon merely wants balance, unlike you.
Balance comes when you consider the wishes of all of the people of
the
country you are Governing.
be
fair
to
Maori as he should, pity there is no acknowledgement of that from >>>>>>>>>>>>>the
racist
Maori whpo want superior rights to the rest of NZ.
Things like sanctity of contract
- except that is just what NActFirstThey do not wish to discard anything that Maori are entitlled to. You
are wanting to discard for Maori
are
lying.
- and the Courts appear to believethat are well outside their province.
there are issues that need to be investigated first. >>>>>>>>>>>Then they should represent those thoughts to government and not make >>>>>>>>>>>decisions
A case has been brought before the court - they must deal with it, but
you want them to ask the government what verdict they want before >>>>>>>>>>hearing the case? Do you want them to salute the Fuehrer when they >>>>>>>>>>ask?
Your abuse becomes worse when you are idiotically wrong as in this case.
Go away little boy and grow a brain.
The courts are to do the bidding of government. Period, there is no >>>>>>>>>room
for
debate on that otherwise you are opposed to democracy and justice. Come
to
think of it, that is what you are isn't it?
You are wrong - the Court will listen to government representatives in >>>>>>>>respect of cases where they are represented, but they will base >>>>>>>>decisions on both evidence and laws that have been passed by >>>>>>>>parliament - whenever that was. You are correct that Maori have taken >>>>>>>>a case in relation to their interests arising from actions of the >>>>>>>>government, but the "bidding of government" will depend on its success >>>>>>>>on the merits of their case. Understand?
said that, your comments are consitent with your Marxist mantra. >>>>>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/supreme-court-orders-govt-to-pay-in-advance-for-maori-coastline-appeal/
It would is perhaps be better for the government to win a court case >>>>>>on its merits than through deliberately withdrawing funding to force >>>>>>the other side to withdraw . . .
Once more Rich resports to abuse when his lies are pointed out. Shame on him.
Childishness is Rich's only strength.
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 07:09:41 -0000 (UTC), TonyYes I have. You just conveniently forget your lies. Read above, it is all there.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 03:58:27 -0000 (UTC), TonyYes I have. You simply use more and more sarcasm, the refuge of the inept and >>illiterate.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:You have not demonstrated any lie from me Tony,
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 01:43:01 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Abuse removed.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 08:14:26 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Nonsense. You are so wrong that you are now invested in the lie.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 21:47:41 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Absolute garbage. You are so wrong that you deserve to be laughed at. >>>>>>>>Having
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 20:28:13 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:I want nothing of the sort.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 08:56:05 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:There is no contract at risk. You are lying.
Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
On 2024-09-20, Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Yes that is correct. If anything the PM is bending over backwards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>to
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 07:03:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Not rubbish at all. You have always chose RNZ as a source >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>because
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/rnzs-online-surge-could-start-to-worry-private-media/What rubbish; all RNZ wants is the opportunity to interviews, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>which
RNZ is a blatantly pro left organisation and is anti this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>government
With The NZ Herald a blatantly pro-government site, both >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Stuff
and
rnz.co.nz are becoming known for independent news and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>analysis.
As
the
article says: "RNZ has broadened its online offering, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>changing
the
types of stories it promotes at the top of its previously >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>hard-news
website to also include lifestyle, celebrity and social >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>media-based
articles."
for
that
reason alone.
traditionally will ask some hard questions but will also give >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>an
opportunity for a politician to say what he also wants to say. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>They
appear to be only prepared to answer questions that they like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>-
try
listening to Media Watch - they do not see RNZ as at all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>biased
-
they
will ask hard questions of all politicians as well as the easy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ones.
After all, did not Christopher Luxon say that his government >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>would
govern for the benefit of all New Zealanders?
it
follows
your lost cause.
The last PM refused interviews many times, no surprise really >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>considering
she
had no credentials.
Luxon merely wants balance, unlike you.
Balance comes when you consider the wishes of all of the people >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>of
the
country you are Governing.
be
fair
to
Maori as he should, pity there is no acknowledgement of that from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>the
racist
Maori whpo want superior rights to the rest of NZ.
Things like sanctity of contract
- except that is just what NActFirstThey do not wish to discard anything that Maori are entitlled to. >>>>>>>>>>>>You
are wanting to discard for Maori
are
lying.
- and the Courts appear to believedecisions
there are issues that need to be investigated first. >>>>>>>>>>>>Then they should represent those thoughts to government and not >>>>>>>>>>>>make
that are well outside their province.
A case has been brought before the court - they must deal with it, >>>>>>>>>>>but
you want them to ask the government what verdict they want before >>>>>>>>>>>hearing the case? Do you want them to salute the Fuehrer when they >>>>>>>>>>>ask?
Your abuse becomes worse when you are idiotically wrong as in this >>>>>>>>>>case.
Go away little boy and grow a brain.
The courts are to do the bidding of government. Period, there is no >>>>>>>>>>room
for
debate on that otherwise you are opposed to democracy and justice. >>>>>>>>>>Come
to
think of it, that is what you are isn't it?
You are wrong - the Court will listen to government representatives in >>>>>>>>>respect of cases where they are represented, but they will base >>>>>>>>>decisions on both evidence and laws that have been passed by >>>>>>>>>parliament - whenever that was. You are correct that Maori have taken >>>>>>>>>a case in relation to their interests arising from actions of the >>>>>>>>>government, but the "bidding of government" will depend on its success >>>>>>>>>on the merits of their case. Understand?
said that, your comments are consitent with your Marxist mantra. >>>>>>>https://newsroom.co.nz/2024/09/20/supreme-court-orders-govt-to-pay-in-advance-for-maori-coastline-appeal/
It would is perhaps be better for the government to win a court case >>>>>>>on its merits than through deliberately withdrawing funding to force >>>>>>>the other side to withdraw . . .
Once more Rich resports to abuse when his lies are pointed out. Shame on >>>>him.
Childishness is Rich's only strength.
You have still not identified anything I have posted that you believe
to be a lie, or gave any justification for such as assertion.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 498 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 55:05:53 |
| Calls: | 9,811 |
| Calls today: | 13 |
| Files: | 13,754 |
| Messages: | 6,190,725 |