• Those excess covid deaths

    From Gordon@21:1/5 to All on Mon Oct 7 01:54:41 2024
    https://correlation-canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/2024-07-19-Correlation-ACM-World-125-countries-Rancourt-Hickey-Linard.pdf

    For those of you who are interested the link above maybe of interested. It
    is a mere 521 pages.

    " We describe plausible mechanisms and argue that the three primary causes
    of death associated with the excess all-cause mortality during (and after)
    the Covid period are:

    (1) Biological (including psychological) stress from mandates such as
    lockdowns and associated socio-economic structural changes

    (2) Non-COVID-19-vaccine medical interventions such as mechanical
    ventilators and drugs (including denial of treatment with antibiotics)

    (3) COVID-19 vaccine injection rollouts, including repeated rollouts on the same populations."

    So there we have it, the treatment did not improve matters.

    Plenty of graphs as well in the 521 pages.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to Gordon on Mon Oct 7 16:02:58 2024
    On 7 Oct 2024 01:54:41 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    https://correlation-canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/2024-07-19-Correlation-ACM-World-125-countries-Rancourt-Hickey-Linard.pdf

    For those of you who are interested the link above maybe of interested. It
    is a mere 521 pages.

    " We describe plausible mechanisms and argue that the three primary causes
    of death associated with the excess all-cause mortality during (and after) >the Covid period are:

    (1) Biological (including psychological) stress from mandates such as >lockdowns and associated socio-economic structural changes

    (2) Non-COVID-19-vaccine medical interventions such as mechanical
    ventilators and drugs (including denial of treatment with antibiotics)

    (3) COVID-19 vaccine injection rollouts, including repeated rollouts on the >same populations."

    So there we have it, the treatment did not improve matters.

    Plenty of graphs as well in the 521 pages.

    Thanks for that. It appears to be saying that a country that had lower mortality than pre-covid , correlates with lower stress from mandates
    than other countries - it is good to get conformation of that for New
    Zealand, but it does not explain why our lower excess mortality lasted
    well into the sequential roll-outs.

    Then of course there is this response: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10203614/

    Who can tell whether the National Library of Medicine is more or less
    reliable than a voluntary group with a novel attitude towards
    scientific research: -
    Correlational research is a type of non-experimental research in which
    the researcher measures two variables and assesses the statistical
    relationship (i.e., the correlation) between them with little or no
    effort to control extraneous variables.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Gordon on Mon Oct 7 02:33:25 2024
    Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote: >https://correlation-canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/2024-07-19-Correlation-ACM-World-125-countries-Rancourt-Hickey-Linard.pdf

    For those of you who are interested the link above maybe of interested. It
    is a mere 521 pages.

    " We describe plausible mechanisms and argue that the three primary causes
    of death associated with the excess all-cause mortality during (and after) >the Covid period are:

    (1) Biological (including psychological) stress from mandates such as >lockdowns and associated socio-economic structural changes

    (2) Non-COVID-19-vaccine medical interventions such as mechanical
    ventilators and drugs (including denial of treatment with antibiotics)

    (3) COVID-19 vaccine injection rollouts, including repeated rollouts on the >same populations."

    So there we have it, the treatment did not improve matters.

    Plenty of graphs as well in the 521 pages.
    Yes. the data becomes increasingly persuasive.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Mon Oct 7 05:07:33 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 7 Oct 2024 01:54:41 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    https://correlation-canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/2024-07-19-Correlation-ACM-World-125-countries-Rancourt-Hickey-Linard.pdf

    For those of you who are interested the link above maybe of interested. It >>is a mere 521 pages.

    " We describe plausible mechanisms and argue that the three primary causes >>of death associated with the excess all-cause mortality during (and after) >>the Covid period are:

    (1) Biological (including psychological) stress from mandates such as >>lockdowns and associated socio-economic structural changes

    (2) Non-COVID-19-vaccine medical interventions such as mechanical >>ventilators and drugs (including denial of treatment with antibiotics)

    (3) COVID-19 vaccine injection rollouts, including repeated rollouts on the >>same populations."

    So there we have it, the treatment did not improve matters.

    Plenty of graphs as well in the 521 pages.

    Thanks for that. It appears to be saying that a country that had lower >mortality than pre-covid , correlates with lower stress from mandates
    than other countries - it is good to get conformation of that for New >Zealand,
    Buillshit. The stress was real and huge.
    . but it does not explain why our lower excess mortality lasted
    well into the sequential roll-outs.
    The jury is still out on that. Data is still being requested and so far not released.

    Then of course there is this response: >https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10203614/

    Who can tell whether the National Library of Medicine is more or less >reliable than a voluntary group with a novel attitude towards
    scientific research: -
    Correlational research is a type of non-experimental research in which
    the researcher measures two variables and assesses the statistical >relationship (i.e., the correlation) between them with little or no
    effort to control extraneous variables.
    Irrelevant.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Mon Oct 7 21:46:19 2024
    On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 05:07:33 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 7 Oct 2024 01:54:41 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    https://correlation-canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/2024-07-19-Correlation-ACM-World-125-countries-Rancourt-Hickey-Linard.pdf

    For those of you who are interested the link above maybe of interested. It >>>is a mere 521 pages.

    " We describe plausible mechanisms and argue that the three primary causes >>>of death associated with the excess all-cause mortality during (and after) >>>the Covid period are:

    (1) Biological (including psychological) stress from mandates such as >>>lockdowns and associated socio-economic structural changes

    (2) Non-COVID-19-vaccine medical interventions such as mechanical >>>ventilators and drugs (including denial of treatment with antibiotics)

    (3) COVID-19 vaccine injection rollouts, including repeated rollouts on the >>>same populations."

    So there we have it, the treatment did not improve matters.

    Plenty of graphs as well in the 521 pages.

    Thanks for that. It appears to be saying that a country that had lower >>mortality than pre-covid , correlates with lower stress from mandates
    than other countries - it is good to get conformation of that for New >>Zealand,
    Buillshit. The stress was real and huge.
    Only on far right nutters that saw what widespread there was for the
    actions taken - and the good results of that appear to be shown in the
    link that you gave, Tony. Don't you believe that report any more?


    . but it does not explain why our lower excess mortality lasted
    well into the sequential roll-outs.
    The jury is still out on that. Data is still being requested and so far not >released.
    Well don't expect this government to allow the data to be released
    again in a hurry - they don't want confirmation of the very wide
    support and the world-beating savings of lives that resulted from the
    actions of the Ardern government. . .



    Then of course there is this response: >>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10203614/

    Who can tell whether the National Library of Medicine is more or less >>reliable than a voluntary group with a novel attitude towards
    scientific research: -
    Correlational research is a type of non-experimental research in which
    the researcher measures two variables and assesses the statistical >>relationship (i.e., the correlation) between them with little or no
    effort to control extraneous variables.
    Irrelevant.
    So you thing correlation research is irrelevant - is that because it
    supported the actions of the Labour government during Covid?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Mon Oct 7 18:35:57 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 05:07:33 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 7 Oct 2024 01:54:41 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    https://correlation-canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/2024-07-19-Correlation-ACM-World-125-countries-Rancourt-Hickey-Linard.pdf

    For those of you who are interested the link above maybe of interested. It >>>>is a mere 521 pages.

    " We describe plausible mechanisms and argue that the three primary causes >>>>of death associated with the excess all-cause mortality during (and after) >>>>the Covid period are:

    (1) Biological (including psychological) stress from mandates such as >>>>lockdowns and associated socio-economic structural changes

    (2) Non-COVID-19-vaccine medical interventions such as mechanical >>>>ventilators and drugs (including denial of treatment with antibiotics)

    (3) COVID-19 vaccine injection rollouts, including repeated rollouts on the >>>>same populations."

    So there we have it, the treatment did not improve matters.

    Plenty of graphs as well in the 521 pages.

    Thanks for that. It appears to be saying that a country that had lower >>>mortality than pre-covid , correlates with lower stress from mandates >>>than other countries - it is good to get conformation of that for New >>>Zealand,
    Buillshit. The stress was real and huge.
    Only on far right nutters that saw what widespread there was for the
    actions taken - and the good results of that appear to be shown in the
    link that you gave, Tony. Don't you believe that report any more?
    You are a genuineely nasty person. I have known very few. Read this - if true (and neither you or I know) then the damage was indee huge, here also - facts cannot be ignored by sane individuls but they are by you.


    . but it does not explain why our lower excess mortality lasted
    well into the sequential roll-outs.
    The jury is still out on that. Data is still being requested and so far not >>released.
    Well don't expect this government to allow the data to be released
    again in a hurry - they don't want confirmation of the very wide
    support and the world-beating savings of lives that resulted from the
    actions of the Ardern government. . .
    The last government refused also - geez you are dumb.



    Then of course there is this response: >>>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10203614/

    Who can tell whether the National Library of Medicine is more or less >>>reliable than a voluntary group with a novel attitude towards
    scientific research: -
    Correlational research is a type of non-experimental research in which >>>the researcher measures two variables and assesses the statistical >>>relationship (i.e., the correlation) between them with little or no >>>effort to control extraneous variables.
    Irrelevant.
    So you thing correlation research is irrelevant - is that because it >supported the actions of the Labour government during Covid?
    I did not say that you twerp. Your comment was irrelevant and still is.
    Your denial of truth knows no bounds - are you paid to post here by the Marxist followers?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Tue Oct 8 10:48:45 2024
    On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 18:35:57 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 05:07:33 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 7 Oct 2024 01:54:41 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    https://correlation-canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/2024-07-19-Correlation-ACM-World-125-countries-Rancourt-Hickey-Linard.pdf

    For those of you who are interested the link above maybe of interested. It >>>>>is a mere 521 pages.

    " We describe plausible mechanisms and argue that the three primary causes >>>>>of death associated with the excess all-cause mortality during (and after) >>>>>the Covid period are:

    (1) Biological (including psychological) stress from mandates such as >>>>>lockdowns and associated socio-economic structural changes

    (2) Non-COVID-19-vaccine medical interventions such as mechanical >>>>>ventilators and drugs (including denial of treatment with antibiotics) >>>>>
    (3) COVID-19 vaccine injection rollouts, including repeated rollouts on the
    same populations."

    So there we have it, the treatment did not improve matters.

    Plenty of graphs as well in the 521 pages.

    Thanks for that. It appears to be saying that a country that had lower >>>>mortality than pre-covid , correlates with lower stress from mandates >>>>than other countries - it is good to get conformation of that for New >>>>Zealand,
    Buillshit. The stress was real and huge.
    Only on far right nutters that saw what widespread there was for the >>actions taken - and the good results of that appear to be shown in the
    link that you gave, Tony. Don't you believe that report any more?
    You are a genuineely nasty person. I have known very few. Read this - if true >(and neither you or I know) then the damage was indee huge, here also - facts >cannot be ignored by sane individuls but they are by you.


    . but it does not explain why our lower excess mortality lasted
    well into the sequential roll-outs.
    The jury is still out on that. Data is still being requested and so far not >>>released.
    Well don't expect this government to allow the data to be released
    again in a hurry - they don't want confirmation of the very wide
    support and the world-beating savings of lives that resulted from the >>actions of the Ardern government. . .
    The last government refused also - geez you are dumb.
    I said "released again", deliberately - the Ardern Government did
    release a huge amount of data, and through comparisons generated using
    that data by World Health Organisations, we know that the actions
    taken by our government at that time resulted in a reduction in death
    rates from all causes - and yes we know that some of that was due to
    reductions in deaths from road fatalities, and from influenza - the
    precautions taken in rest homes and retirement villages were effective
    - we had learned how vulnerable old people are from some early
    spreading events, and took steps to reduce those deaths.

    So you will appreciate why the current government does not really want
    anyone to look at that data again and reflect on why we did so much
    better than other countries at keeping our people alive - having
    courted nutters to get elected, they do not want those crazies to
    realise the depth of support there was, including from the National
    Party, for the precautions taken by the Ardern Government that were so successful






    Then of course there is this response: >>>>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10203614/

    Who can tell whether the National Library of Medicine is more or less >>>>reliable than a voluntary group with a novel attitude towards >>>>scientific research: -
    Correlational research is a type of non-experimental research in which >>>>the researcher measures two variables and assesses the statistical >>>>relationship (i.e., the correlation) between them with little or no >>>>effort to control extraneous variables.
    Irrelevant.
    So you thing correlation research is irrelevant - is that because it >>supported the actions of the Labour government during Covid?
    I did not say that you twerp. Your comment was irrelevant and still is.
    Your denial of truth knows no bounds - are you paid to post here by the Marxist
    followers?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Tue Oct 8 00:11:45 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 18:35:57 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 05:07:33 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 7 Oct 2024 01:54:41 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    https://correlation-canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/2024-07-19-Correlation-ACM-World-125-countries-Rancourt-Hickey-Linard.pdf

    For those of you who are interested the link above maybe of interested. It
    is a mere 521 pages.

    " We describe plausible mechanisms and argue that the three primary >>>>>>causes
    of death associated with the excess all-cause mortality during (and >>>>>>after)
    the Covid period are:

    (1) Biological (including psychological) stress from mandates such as >>>>>>lockdowns and associated socio-economic structural changes

    (2) Non-COVID-19-vaccine medical interventions such as mechanical >>>>>>ventilators and drugs (including denial of treatment with antibiotics) >>>>>>
    (3) COVID-19 vaccine injection rollouts, including repeated rollouts on >>>>>>the
    same populations."

    So there we have it, the treatment did not improve matters.

    Plenty of graphs as well in the 521 pages.

    Thanks for that. It appears to be saying that a country that had lower >>>>>mortality than pre-covid , correlates with lower stress from mandates >>>>>than other countries - it is good to get conformation of that for New >>>>>Zealand,
    Buillshit. The stress was real and huge.
    Only on far right nutters that saw what widespread there was for the >>>actions taken - and the good results of that appear to be shown in the >>>link that you gave, Tony. Don't you believe that report any more?
    You are a genuineely nasty person. I have known very few. Read this - if true >>(and neither you or I know) then the damage was indee huge, here also - facts >>cannot be ignored by sane individuls but they are by you.


    . but it does not explain why our lower excess mortality lasted
    well into the sequential roll-outs.
    The jury is still out on that. Data is still being requested and so far not >>>>released.
    Well don't expect this government to allow the data to be released
    again in a hurry - they don't want confirmation of the very wide
    support and the world-beating savings of lives that resulted from the >>>actions of the Ardern government. . .
    The last government refused also - geez you are dumb.
    I said "released again", deliberately - the Ardern Government did
    release a huge amount of data
    But not all of it. As I pointed out. Are you that dense?
    , and through comparisons generated using
    that data by World Health Organisations, we know that the actions
    taken by our government at that time resulted in a reduction in death
    rates from all causes
    We know nothing of the sort - cite?
    - and yes we know that some of that was due to
    reductions in deaths from road fatalities, and from influenza - the >precautions taken in rest homes and retirement villages were effective
    - we had learned how vulnerable old people are from some early
    spreading events, and took steps to reduce those deaths.
    Unproven rhetoric.

    So you will appreciate why the current government does not really want
    anyone to look at that data again and reflect on why we did so much
    better than other countries at keeping our people alive - having
    courted nutters to get elected, they do not want those crazies to
    realise the depth of support there was, including from the National
    Party, for the precautions taken by the Ardern Government that were so >successful
    Political rhetoric. Ardern refused to release much data, this government has not fixed that but they have time. Ardern doesn't, she is irrelevant.






    Then of course there is this response: >>>>>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10203614/

    Who can tell whether the National Library of Medicine is more or less >>>>>reliable than a voluntary group with a novel attitude towards >>>>>scientific research: -
    Correlational research is a type of non-experimental research in which >>>>>the researcher measures two variables and assesses the statistical >>>>>relationship (i.e., the correlation) between them with little or no >>>>>effort to control extraneous variables.
    Irrelevant.
    So you thing correlation research is irrelevant - is that because it >>>supported the actions of the Labour government during Covid?
    I did not say that you twerp. Your comment was irrelevant and still is. >>Your denial of truth knows no bounds - are you paid to post here by the >>Marxist
    followers?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Tue Oct 8 16:58:45 2024
    On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:11:45 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 18:35:57 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 05:07:33 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 7 Oct 2024 01:54:41 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    https://correlation-canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/2024-07-19-Correlation-ACM-World-125-countries-Rancourt-Hickey-Linard.pdf

    For those of you who are interested the link above maybe of interested. It
    is a mere 521 pages.

    " We describe plausible mechanisms and argue that the three primary >>>>>>>causes
    of death associated with the excess all-cause mortality during (and >>>>>>>after)
    the Covid period are:

    (1) Biological (including psychological) stress from mandates such as >>>>>>>lockdowns and associated socio-economic structural changes

    (2) Non-COVID-19-vaccine medical interventions such as mechanical >>>>>>>ventilators and drugs (including denial of treatment with antibiotics) >>>>>>>
    (3) COVID-19 vaccine injection rollouts, including repeated rollouts on >>>>>>>the
    same populations."

    So there we have it, the treatment did not improve matters.

    Plenty of graphs as well in the 521 pages.

    Thanks for that. It appears to be saying that a country that had lower >>>>>>mortality than pre-covid , correlates with lower stress from mandates >>>>>>than other countries - it is good to get conformation of that for New >>>>>>Zealand,
    Buillshit. The stress was real and huge.
    Only on far right nutters that saw what widespread there was for the >>>>actions taken - and the good results of that appear to be shown in the >>>>link that you gave, Tony. Don't you believe that report any more?
    You are a genuineely nasty person. I have known very few. Read this - if true
    (and neither you or I know) then the damage was indee huge, here also - facts
    cannot be ignored by sane individuls but they are by you.


    . but it does not explain why our lower excess mortality lasted
    well into the sequential roll-outs.
    The jury is still out on that. Data is still being requested and so far not
    released.
    Well don't expect this government to allow the data to be released >>>>again in a hurry - they don't want confirmation of the very wide >>>>support and the world-beating savings of lives that resulted from the >>>>actions of the Ardern government. . .
    The last government refused also - geez you are dumb.
    I said "released again", deliberately - the Ardern Government did
    release a huge amount of data
    But not all of it. As I pointed out. Are you that dense?
    No, you said that "Data is still being requested and so far not
    released." The Seymour/Peters/Luxon government has been in for a long
    time now - are you saying they are refusing to release data?

    , and through comparisons generated using
    that data by World Health Organisations, we know that the actions
    taken by our government at that time resulted in a reduction in death
    rates from all causes
    We know nothing of the sort - cite?
    Excess death graphs giving international comparisons - posted plenty
    of times here . . .

    - and yes we know that some of that was due to
    reductions in deaths from road fatalities, and from influenza - the >>precautions taken in rest homes and retirement villages were effective
    - we had learned how vulnerable old people are from some early
    spreading events, and took steps to reduce those deaths.
    Unproven rhetoric.
    What other explanations do you have for our mortality experience being
    lower than the period before Covid, Tony. Road fatality statistics
    were quite clear at the time - but of course you won't want to watch
    them as higher speeds cause higher deaths in the future . . .


    So you will appreciate why the current government does not really want >>anyone to look at that data again and reflect on why we did so much
    better than other countries at keeping our people alive - having
    courted nutters to get elected, they do not want those crazies to
    realise the depth of support there was, including from the National
    Party, for the precautions taken by the Ardern Government that were so >>successful
    Political rhetoric. Ardern refused to release much data, this government has >not fixed that but they have time. Ardern doesn't, she is irrelevant.






    Then of course there is this response: >>>>>>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10203614/

    Who can tell whether the National Library of Medicine is more or less >>>>>>reliable than a voluntary group with a novel attitude towards >>>>>>scientific research: -
    Correlational research is a type of non-experimental research in which >>>>>>the researcher measures two variables and assesses the statistical >>>>>>relationship (i.e., the correlation) between them with little or no >>>>>>effort to control extraneous variables.
    Irrelevant.
    So you thing correlation research is irrelevant - is that because it >>>>supported the actions of the Labour government during Covid?
    I did not say that you twerp. Your comment was irrelevant and still is. >>>Your denial of truth knows no bounds - are you paid to post here by the >>>Marxist
    followers?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Tue Oct 8 05:37:14 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:11:45 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 18:35:57 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 05:07:33 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 7 Oct 2024 01:54:41 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    https://correlation-canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/2024-07-19-Correlation-ACM-World-125-countries-Rancourt-Hickey-Linard.pdf

    For those of you who are interested the link above maybe of interested. >>>>>>>>It
    is a mere 521 pages.

    " We describe plausible mechanisms and argue that the three primary >>>>>>>>causes
    of death associated with the excess all-cause mortality during (and >>>>>>>>after)
    the Covid period are:

    (1) Biological (including psychological) stress from mandates such as >>>>>>>>lockdowns and associated socio-economic structural changes

    (2) Non-COVID-19-vaccine medical interventions such as mechanical >>>>>>>>ventilators and drugs (including denial of treatment with antibiotics) >>>>>>>>
    (3) COVID-19 vaccine injection rollouts, including repeated rollouts on >>>>>>>>the
    same populations."

    So there we have it, the treatment did not improve matters.

    Plenty of graphs as well in the 521 pages.

    Thanks for that. It appears to be saying that a country that had lower >>>>>>>mortality than pre-covid , correlates with lower stress from mandates >>>>>>>than other countries - it is good to get conformation of that for New >>>>>>>Zealand,
    Buillshit. The stress was real and huge.
    Only on far right nutters that saw what widespread there was for the >>>>>actions taken - and the good results of that appear to be shown in the >>>>>link that you gave, Tony. Don't you believe that report any more?
    You are a genuineely nasty person. I have known very few. Read this - if >>>>true
    (and neither you or I know) then the damage was indee huge, here also - >>>>facts
    cannot be ignored by sane individuls but they are by you.


    . but it does not explain why our lower excess mortality lasted >>>>>>>well into the sequential roll-outs.
    The jury is still out on that. Data is still being requested and so far >>>>>>not
    released.
    Well don't expect this government to allow the data to be released >>>>>again in a hurry - they don't want confirmation of the very wide >>>>>support and the world-beating savings of lives that resulted from the >>>>>actions of the Ardern government. . .
    The last government refused also - geez you are dumb.
    I said "released again", deliberately - the Ardern Government did
    release a huge amount of data
    But not all of it. As I pointed out. Are you that dense?
    No, you said that "Data is still being requested and so far not
    released." The Seymour/Peters/Luxon government has been in for a long
    time now - are you saying they are refusing to release data?
    Yes and has been since the last government was pretending to govern.

    , and through comparisons generated using
    that data by World Health Organisations, we know that the actions
    taken by our government at that time resulted in a reduction in death >>>rates from all causes
    We know nothing of the sort - cite?
    Excess death graphs giving international comparisons - posted plenty
    of times here . . .
    Cite? Not nonsense, actual prrof that what you said is true I quote "we know that the actions
    taken by our government at that time resulted in a reduction in death
    rates from all causes." No proof of this has ever been posted here.

    - and yes we know that some of that was due to
    reductions in deaths from road fatalities, and from influenza - the >>>precautions taken in rest homes and retirement villages were effective
    - we had learned how vulnerable old people are from some early
    spreading events, and took steps to reduce those deaths.
    Unproven rhetoric.
    What other explanations do you have for our mortality experience being
    lower than the period before Covid, Tony. Road fatality statistics
    were quite clear at the time - but of course you won't want to watch
    them as higher speeds cause higher deaths in the future . . .
    No proof of that either.


    So you will appreciate why the current government does not really want >>>anyone to look at that data again and reflect on why we did so much >>>better than other countries at keeping our people alive - having
    courted nutters to get elected, they do not want those crazies to
    realise the depth of support there was, including from the National >>>Party, for the precautions taken by the Ardern Government that were so >>>successful
    Political rhetoric. Ardern refused to release much data, this government has >>not fixed that but they have time. Ardern doesn't, she is irrelevant.






    Then of course there is this response: >>>>>>>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10203614/

    Who can tell whether the National Library of Medicine is more or less >>>>>>>reliable than a voluntary group with a novel attitude towards >>>>>>>scientific research: -
    Correlational research is a type of non-experimental research in which >>>>>>>the researcher measures two variables and assesses the statistical >>>>>>>relationship (i.e., the correlation) between them with little or no >>>>>>>effort to control extraneous variables.
    Irrelevant.
    So you thing correlation research is irrelevant - is that because it >>>>>supported the actions of the Labour government during Covid?
    I did not say that you twerp. Your comment was irrelevant and still is. >>>>Your denial of truth knows no bounds - are you paid to post here by the >>>>Marxist
    followers?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Tue Oct 8 20:02:36 2024
    On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:37:14 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:11:45 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 18:35:57 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 05:07:33 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 7 Oct 2024 01:54:41 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
    https://correlation-canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/2024-07-19-Correlation-ACM-World-125-countries-Rancourt-Hickey-Linard.pdf

    For those of you who are interested the link above maybe of interested.
    It
    is a mere 521 pages.

    " We describe plausible mechanisms and argue that the three primary >>>>>>>>>causes
    of death associated with the excess all-cause mortality during (and >>>>>>>>>after)
    the Covid period are:

    (1) Biological (including psychological) stress from mandates such as >>>>>>>>>lockdowns and associated socio-economic structural changes

    (2) Non-COVID-19-vaccine medical interventions such as mechanical >>>>>>>>>ventilators and drugs (including denial of treatment with antibiotics) >>>>>>>>>
    (3) COVID-19 vaccine injection rollouts, including repeated rollouts on
    the
    same populations."

    So there we have it, the treatment did not improve matters.

    Plenty of graphs as well in the 521 pages.

    Thanks for that. It appears to be saying that a country that had lower >>>>>>>>mortality than pre-covid , correlates with lower stress from mandates >>>>>>>>than other countries - it is good to get conformation of that for New >>>>>>>>Zealand,
    Buillshit. The stress was real and huge.
    Only on far right nutters that saw what widespread there was for the >>>>>>actions taken - and the good results of that appear to be shown in the >>>>>>link that you gave, Tony. Don't you believe that report any more? >>>>>You are a genuineely nasty person. I have known very few. Read this - if >>>>>true
    (and neither you or I know) then the damage was indee huge, here also - >>>>>facts
    cannot be ignored by sane individuls but they are by you.


    . but it does not explain why our lower excess mortality lasted >>>>>>>>well into the sequential roll-outs.
    The jury is still out on that. Data is still being requested and so far >>>>>>>not
    released.
    Well don't expect this government to allow the data to be released >>>>>>again in a hurry - they don't want confirmation of the very wide >>>>>>support and the world-beating savings of lives that resulted from the >>>>>>actions of the Ardern government. . .
    The last government refused also - geez you are dumb.
    I said "released again", deliberately - the Ardern Government did >>>>release a huge amount of data
    But not all of it. As I pointed out. Are you that dense?
    No, you said that "Data is still being requested and so far not
    released." The Seymour/Peters/Luxon government has been in for a long
    time now - are you saying they are refusing to release data?
    Yes and has been since the last government was pretending to govern.
    Now you are just being abusive.
    , and through comparisons generated using
    that data by World Health Organisations, we know that the actions
    taken by our government at that time resulted in a reduction in death >>>>rates from all causes
    We know nothing of the sort - cite?
    Excess death graphs giving international comparisons - posted plenty
    of times here . . .
    Cite? Not nonsense, actual prrof that what you said is true I quote "we know >that the actions
    taken by our government at that time resulted in a reduction in death
    rates from all causes." No proof of this has ever been posted here.
    Again more stupidity from Tony.

    See: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-excess-deaths-covid?time=earliest..2023-12-31&country=~NZL

    The comparison with other countries changes the scale to make the
    savings less obvious - but our better performance is still clear: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-excess-deaths-covid?time=earliest..2023-12-31&country=NZL~AUS~FRA~GBR~USA
    (Try clicking on the selection of the UK and USA to see what a
    difference that makes)


    - and yes we know that some of that was due to
    reductions in deaths from road fatalities, and from influenza - the >>>>precautions taken in rest homes and retirement villages were effective >>>>- we had learned how vulnerable old people are from some early >>>>spreading events, and took steps to reduce those deaths.
    Unproven rhetoric.
    So how do you explain it?

    What other explanations do you have for our mortality experience being >>lower than the period before Covid, Tony. Road fatality statistics
    were quite clear at the time - but of course you won't want to watch
    them as higher speeds cause higher deaths in the future . . .
    No proof of that either.
    There has been in the past - the way things are going off track many
    may not be able to afford to drive . . .




    So you will appreciate why the current government does not really want >>>>anyone to look at that data again and reflect on why we did so much >>>>better than other countries at keeping our people alive - having >>>>courted nutters to get elected, they do not want those crazies to >>>>realise the depth of support there was, including from the National >>>>Party, for the precautions taken by the Ardern Government that were so >>>>successful
    Political rhetoric. Ardern refused to release much data, this government has >>>not fixed that but they have time. Ardern doesn't, she is irrelevant. Unsupported assertions again, Tony. The data required for the
    comparisons I have yet again posted are enough for us to know that New
    Zealand did extremely well in keeping Covid deaths low.


    Then of course there is this response: >>>>>>>>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10203614/

    Who can tell whether the National Library of Medicine is more or less >>>>>>>>reliable than a voluntary group with a novel attitude towards >>>>>>>>scientific research: -
    Correlational research is a type of non-experimental research in which >>>>>>>>the researcher measures two variables and assesses the statistical >>>>>>>>relationship (i.e., the correlation) between them with little or no >>>>>>>>effort to control extraneous variables.
    Irrelevant.
    So you thing correlation research is irrelevant - is that because it >>>>>>supported the actions of the Labour government during Covid?
    I did not say that you twerp. Your comment was irrelevant and still is. >>>>>Your denial of truth knows no bounds - are you paid to post here by the >>>>>Marxist
    followers?
    Inn other words you are not able to give any coherent response so
    resort to dribbling personal abuse and lies.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Tue Oct 8 07:36:29 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:37:14 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 00:11:45 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 18:35:57 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 05:07:33 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 7 Oct 2024 01:54:41 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>https://correlation-canada.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/2024-07-19-Correlation-ACM-World-125-countries-Rancourt-Hickey-Linard.pdf

    For those of you who are interested the link above maybe of >>>>>>>>>>interested.
    It
    is a mere 521 pages.

    " We describe plausible mechanisms and argue that the three primary >>>>>>>>>>causes
    of death associated with the excess all-cause mortality during (and >>>>>>>>>>after)
    the Covid period are:

    (1) Biological (including psychological) stress from mandates such as >>>>>>>>>>lockdowns and associated socio-economic structural changes

    (2) Non-COVID-19-vaccine medical interventions such as mechanical >>>>>>>>>>ventilators and drugs (including denial of treatment with antibiotics)

    (3) COVID-19 vaccine injection rollouts, including repeated rollouts >>>>>>>>>>on
    the
    same populations."

    So there we have it, the treatment did not improve matters. >>>>>>>>>>
    Plenty of graphs as well in the 521 pages.

    Thanks for that. It appears to be saying that a country that had lower >>>>>>>>>mortality than pre-covid , correlates with lower stress from mandates >>>>>>>>>than other countries - it is good to get conformation of that for New >>>>>>>>>Zealand,
    Buillshit. The stress was real and huge.
    Only on far right nutters that saw what widespread there was for the >>>>>>>actions taken - and the good results of that appear to be shown in the >>>>>>>link that you gave, Tony. Don't you believe that report any more? >>>>>>You are a genuineely nasty person. I have known very few. Read this - if >>>>>>true
    (and neither you or I know) then the damage was indee huge, here also - >>>>>>facts
    cannot be ignored by sane individuls but they are by you.


    . but it does not explain why our lower excess mortality lasted >>>>>>>>>well into the sequential roll-outs.
    The jury is still out on that. Data is still being requested and so far >>>>>>>>not
    released.
    Well don't expect this government to allow the data to be released >>>>>>>again in a hurry - they don't want confirmation of the very wide >>>>>>>support and the world-beating savings of lives that resulted from the >>>>>>>actions of the Ardern government. . .
    The last government refused also - geez you are dumb.
    I said "released again", deliberately - the Ardern Government did >>>>>release a huge amount of data
    But not all of it. As I pointed out. Are you that dense?
    No, you said that "Data is still being requested and so far not >>>released." The Seymour/Peters/Luxon government has been in for a long >>>time now - are you saying they are refusing to release data?
    Yes and has been since the last government was pretending to govern.
    Now you are just being abusive.
    The truth is never abuse and I wrote the truth. They were the most incompetent government in the history of this country by a country mile.
    , and through comparisons generated using
    that data by World Health Organisations, we know that the actions >>>>>taken by our government at that time resulted in a reduction in death >>>>>rates from all causes
    We know nothing of the sort - cite?
    Excess death graphs giving international comparisons - posted plenty
    of times here . . .
    Cite? Not nonsense, actual prrof that what you said is true I quote "we know >>that the actions
    taken by our government at that time resulted in a reduction in death
    rates from all causes." No proof of this has ever been posted here.
    Again more stupidity from Tony.
    No answer then, as I expected. No cite, no proof.

    See: >https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-excess-deaths-covid?time=earliest..2023-12-31&country=~NZL

    The comparison with other countries changes the scale to make the
    savings less obvious - but our better performance is still clear: >https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-excess-deaths-covid?time=earliest..2023-12-31&country=NZL~AUS~FRA~GBR~USA
    (Try clicking on the selection of the UK and USA to see what a
    difference that makes)
    Completely irrelevant. Show how what I posted does not apply here - because it does.


    - and yes we know that some of that was due to
    reductions in deaths from road fatalities, and from influenza - the >>>>>precautions taken in rest homes and retirement villages were effective >>>>>- we had learned how vulnerable old people are from some early >>>>>spreading events, and took steps to reduce those deaths.
    Unproven rhetoric.
    So how do you explain it?
    What? You have shown no evidence.

    What other explanations do you have for our mortality experience being >>>lower than the period before Covid, Tony. Road fatality statistics
    were quite clear at the time - but of course you won't want to watch
    them as higher speeds cause higher deaths in the future . . .
    No proof of that either.
    There has been in the past - the way things are going off track many
    may not be able to afford to drive . . .
    Off topic childishness.




    So you will appreciate why the current government does not really want >>>>>anyone to look at that data again and reflect on why we did so much >>>>>better than other countries at keeping our people alive - having >>>>>courted nutters to get elected, they do not want those crazies to >>>>>realise the depth of support there was, including from the National >>>>>Party, for the precautions taken by the Ardern Government that were so >>>>>successful
    Political rhetoric. Ardern refused to release much data, this government >>>>has
    not fixed that but they have time. Ardern doesn't, she is irrelevant. >Unsupported assertions again, Tony.
    Yes and I am entit;ed to them just as you do exactly the same daily.
    The data required for the
    comparisons I have yet again posted are enough for us to know that New >Zealand did extremely well in keeping Covid deaths low.
    No they have not. Produce the proof or piss off little boy.


    Then of course there is this response: >>>>>>>>>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10203614/

    Who can tell whether the National Library of Medicine is more or less >>>>>>>>>reliable than a voluntary group with a novel attitude towards >>>>>>>>>scientific research: -
    Correlational research is a type of non-experimental research in which >>>>>>>>>the researcher measures two variables and assesses the statistical >>>>>>>>>relationship (i.e., the correlation) between them with little or no >>>>>>>>>effort to control extraneous variables.
    Irrelevant.
    So you thing correlation research is irrelevant - is that because it >>>>>>>supported the actions of the Labour government during Covid?
    I did not say that you twerp. Your comment was irrelevant and still is. >>>>>>Your denial of truth knows no bounds - are you paid to post here by the >>>>>>Marxist
    followers?
    Abuse gone.
    Rich is a silly child in a geriatric body.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Fri Oct 18 07:04:11 2024
    Phrase for today: “cycle of panic and neglect”.

    Those wise enough not to neglect preparations for the next pandemic will minimize the panic if/when it does hit ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)