• A Fitting Tribute

    From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Sat Oct 12 20:25:54 2024
    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/530545/jacinda-ardern-to-receive-damehood-from-prince-william-at-windsor-castle-investiture-ceremony

    Ardern's official citation listed her leadership in response to the 15
    March terrorist attacks and the Covid-19 pandemic "positioning New
    Zealand as having one of the lowest Covid-19 related death rates in
    the Western world".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Sat Oct 12 18:51:13 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/530545/jacinda-ardern-to-receive-damehood-from-prince-william-at-windsor-castle-investiture-ceremony

    Ardern's official citation listed her leadership in response to the 15
    March terrorist attacks and the Covid-19 pandemic "positioning New
    Zealand as having one of the lowest Covid-19 related death rates in
    the Western world".
    You can fool some of the people........
    This is clearly politically motivated, paid for by the Klaus Schwab mob or similar.
    She is idolised by fools like you and by those who would like to rule mankind. They never will.
    History will show that Ardern was a sham. A clever manipulator of people who finally got caught.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Sun Oct 13 21:00:15 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/530545/jacinda-ardern-to-receive-damehood-from-prince-william-at-windsor-castle-investiture-ceremony

    Ardern's official citation listed her leadership in response to the 15
    March terrorist attacks and the Covid-19 pandemic "positioning New
    Zealand as having one of the lowest Covid-19 related death rates in
    the Western world".
    Worst PM this country has ever had and probably ever will.
    History will tell in time.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordon@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Sun Oct 13 23:57:04 2024
    On 2024-10-12, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/530545/jacinda-ardern-to-receive-damehood-from-prince-william-at-windsor-castle-investiture-ceremony

    Ardern's official citation listed her leadership in response to the 15
    March terrorist attacks and the Covid-19 pandemic "positioning New
    Zealand as having one of the lowest Covid-19 related death rates in
    the Western world".

    It is such a pity that in circumstances such as this that the other achievements are not recognised.

    Or even take into account the excess deaths.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to Gordon on Mon Oct 14 14:42:51 2024
    On 13 Oct 2024 23:57:04 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2024-10-12, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/530545/jacinda-ardern-to-receive-damehood-from-prince-william-at-windsor-castle-investiture-ceremony

    Ardern's official citation listed her leadership in response to the 15
    March terrorist attacks and the Covid-19 pandemic "positioning New
    Zealand as having one of the lowest Covid-19 related death rates in
    the Western world".

    It is such a pity that in circumstances such as this that the other >achievements are not recognised.

    Or even take into account the excess deaths.

    Yes the excess deaths were taken into account - the startling reality
    for the rest of the world was that for a considerable period, those
    excess deaths were _negative_ - in other words we experienced lower
    deaths due to fewer Covid deaths than other countries, but the
    precautions also reducing deaths from other causes such as road
    accidents and influenza. But you are correct there are a number of
    other achievements that could have also been highlighted.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Mon Oct 14 02:50:54 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 13 Oct 2024 23:57:04 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2024-10-12, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/530545/jacinda-ardern-to-receive-damehood-from-prince-william-at-windsor-castle-investiture-ceremony

    Ardern's official citation listed her leadership in response to the 15
    March terrorist attacks and the Covid-19 pandemic "positioning New
    Zealand as having one of the lowest Covid-19 related death rates in
    the Western world".

    It is such a pity that in circumstances such as this that the other >>achievements are not recognised.

    Or even take into account the excess deaths.

    Yes the excess deaths were taken into account - the startling reality
    for the rest of the world was that for a considerable period, those
    excess deaths were _negative_ - in other words we experienced lower
    deaths due to fewer Covid deaths than other countries, but the
    precautions also reducing deaths from other causes such as road
    accidents and influenza. But you are correct there are a number of
    other achievements that could have also been highlighted.
    Keep peddling your lies. They will haunt you one day. Oh, and my spelling is correct, just teaching you some good gerund form.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Mon Oct 14 16:27:12 2024
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 02:50:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 13 Oct 2024 23:57:04 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2024-10-12, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/530545/jacinda-ardern-to-receive-damehood-from-prince-william-at-windsor-castle-investiture-ceremony

    Ardern's official citation listed her leadership in response to the 15 >>>> March terrorist attacks and the Covid-19 pandemic "positioning New
    Zealand as having one of the lowest Covid-19 related death rates in
    the Western world".

    It is such a pity that in circumstances such as this that the other >>>achievements are not recognised.

    Or even take into account the excess deaths.

    Yes the excess deaths were taken into account - the startling reality
    for the rest of the world was that for a considerable period, those
    excess deaths were _negative_ - in other words we experienced lower
    deaths due to fewer Covid deaths than other countries, but the
    precautions also reducing deaths from other causes such as road
    accidents and influenza. But you are correct there are a number of
    other achievements that could have also been highlighted.
    Keep peddling your lies. They will haunt you one day. Oh, and my spelling is >correct, just teaching you some good gerund form.

    There were no lies in what I said - so I have not peddled any lies -
    making your statement a lie . . .,

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Mon Oct 14 06:19:41 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 02:50:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 13 Oct 2024 23:57:04 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2024-10-12, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/530545/jacinda-ardern-to-receive-damehood-from-prince-william-at-windsor-castle-investiture-ceremony

    Ardern's official citation listed her leadership in response to the 15 >>>>> March terrorist attacks and the Covid-19 pandemic "positioning New
    Zealand as having one of the lowest Covid-19 related death rates in
    the Western world".

    It is such a pity that in circumstances such as this that the other >>>>achievements are not recognised.

    Or even take into account the excess deaths.

    Yes the excess deaths were taken into account - the startling reality
    for the rest of the world was that for a considerable period, those >>>excess deaths were _negative_ - in other words we experienced lower >>>deaths due to fewer Covid deaths than other countries, but the >>>precautions also reducing deaths from other causes such as road
    accidents and influenza. But you are correct there are a number of
    other achievements that could have also been highlighted.
    Keep peddling your lies. They will haunt you one day. Oh, and my spelling is >>correct, just teaching you some good gerund form.

    There were no lies in what I said - so I have not peddled any lies -
    making your statement a lie . . .,
    If only you had not lied. But you did. More than once.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Mon Oct 14 22:25:08 2024
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 06:19:41 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 02:50:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 13 Oct 2024 23:57:04 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2024-10-12, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/530545/jacinda-ardern-to-receive-damehood-from-prince-william-at-windsor-castle-investiture-ceremony

    Ardern's official citation listed her leadership in response to the 15 >>>>>> March terrorist attacks and the Covid-19 pandemic "positioning New >>>>>> Zealand as having one of the lowest Covid-19 related death rates in >>>>>> the Western world".

    It is such a pity that in circumstances such as this that the other >>>>>achievements are not recognised.

    Or even take into account the excess deaths.

    Yes the excess deaths were taken into account - the startling reality >>>>for the rest of the world was that for a considerable period, those >>>>excess deaths were _negative_ - in other words we experienced lower >>>>deaths due to fewer Covid deaths than other countries, but the >>>>precautions also reducing deaths from other causes such as road >>>>accidents and influenza. But you are correct there are a number of >>>>other achievements that could have also been highlighted.
    Keep peddling your lies. They will haunt you one day. Oh, and my spelling is >>>correct, just teaching you some good gerund form.

    There were no lies in what I said - so I have not peddled any lies -
    making your statement a lie . . .,
    If only you had not lied. But you did. More than once.
    No, yo are again wrong - you cannot identify a lie so just make shit
    up - anything to avoid recognising the reason Jacinda Ardern is
    receiving a significant honour from Prince William.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BR@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 15 06:00:27 2024
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:42:51 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    in other words we experienced lower deaths due to fewer Covid deaths than other countries,

    It is impossible to get accurate statistics on any of this because
    there was so much ambiguity around what constitutes a "covid death".

    Every commentator just spins it to suit their own narrarive, as you
    have just done.

    Bill.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Mon Oct 14 18:47:54 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 06:19:41 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 02:50:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 13 Oct 2024 23:57:04 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2024-10-12, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/530545/jacinda-ardern-to-receive-damehood-from-prince-william-at-windsor-castle-investiture-ceremony

    Ardern's official citation listed her leadership in response to the 15 >>>>>>> March terrorist attacks and the Covid-19 pandemic "positioning New >>>>>>> Zealand as having one of the lowest Covid-19 related death rates in >>>>>>> the Western world".

    It is such a pity that in circumstances such as this that the other >>>>>>achievements are not recognised.

    Or even take into account the excess deaths.

    Yes the excess deaths were taken into account - the startling reality >>>>>for the rest of the world was that for a considerable period, those >>>>>excess deaths were _negative_ - in other words we experienced lower >>>>>deaths due to fewer Covid deaths than other countries, but the >>>>>precautions also reducing deaths from other causes such as road >>>>>accidents and influenza. But you are correct there are a number of >>>>>other achievements that could have also been highlighted.
    Keep peddling your lies. They will haunt you one day. Oh, and my spelling >>>>is
    correct, just teaching you some good gerund form.

    There were no lies in what I said - so I have not peddled any lies - >>>making your statement a lie . . .,
    If only you had not lied. But you did. More than once.
    No, yo are again wrong - you cannot identify a lie so just make shit
    up - anything to avoid recognising the reason Jacinda Ardern is
    receiving a significant honour from Prince William.
    Another lie - you cannot help it. Sociopathy does that to people. You need help.
    Prince William is doing nothing of the sort - it is from thee NZ government and the Prince is doing as requested.
    Ardern was the worst PM we have ever had and history will show that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to blah@blah.blah on Tue Oct 15 10:13:23 2024
    On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 06:00:27 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:42:51 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    in other words we experienced lower deaths due to fewer Covid deaths than other countries,

    It is impossible to get accurate statistics on any of this because
    there was so much ambiguity around what constitutes a "covid death".

    Every commentator just spins it to suit their own narrarive, as you
    have just done.

    Bill.

    As I said earlier, but you deleted:
    "Yes the excess deaths were taken into account - the startling reality
    for the rest of the world was that for a considerable period, those
    excess deaths were _negative_ - in other words we experienced lower
    deaths due to fewer Covid deaths than other countries, but the
    precautions also reducing deaths from other causes such as road
    accidents and influenza."

    One of the statistics that we can track very accurately is deaths -
    deaths are usually noticed fairly quickly, and are required to be
    reported fairly quickly. With that data we have other information
    about those that have died such as their age.

    So one of the international comparisons was to look at the statistics
    for deaths based on the age of death, and compare predictions based on
    the death rates for each age in the year prior to Covid. They could
    also look at other causes of death - for example we know that the
    number of road deaths reduced because of the lockdowns - but the
    numbers were very small. At that time, some countries were
    experiencing very high rates of death from Covid - they were
    bulldozing trenches for dead bodies in some places!

    Now lockdowns did also reduce road deaths in New Zealand - but the
    number was very small - not enough to significantly change overall
    death rates significantly. We did see some groups of death from
    spreader events - when Covid was carried to a couple of rest homes for
    example, or to some church services where people were gathered close
    together, and those were investigated quickly and further gatherings discouraged, but most significantly visits to hospitals and rest homes
    and hospices were reduced by either not permitting visitors or
    insisting on a clear Covid test when those became available.

    The reduction in influenza and other respiratory diseases through
    those precautions was significant - it was more significant than
    actual Covid related deaths, and we saw a reduction in overall rates
    of death for quite some time.

    In international comparisons covering the Covid period on that basis,
    New Zealand did better than nearly every other country, and I have
    posted the link to those statistics a number of times. Our rates of
    death from Covid have increased - they are apparently around 1000 a
    year, and we are on our sixth variant; with new variants arriving
    about every 5 to 6 months. That may well be because the rate of
    vaccination has reduced - it is no longer free for all, and some
    idiots refuse to be vaccinated even if it is free for them (there was
    a big increase in hospitalisations during the parliamentary protests -
    many of those having not been vaccinated).

    Some countries are still experiencing much higher death rates than
    pre-Covid; we are not.

    So yes it is possible to get accurate statistics without having to
    rely on recorded cause of death - but we have a fairly good idea as to
    how many deaths are caused by Covid - some are obvious; although it
    may be harder to keep Covid influenced deaths separate from other
    causes as we get more cases of "long Covid" - that is largely for the
    future however . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Mon Oct 14 21:36:01 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 06:00:27 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:42:51 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:

    in other words we experienced lower deaths due to fewer Covid deaths than >>>other countries,

    It is impossible to get accurate statistics on any of this because
    there was so much ambiguity around what constitutes a "covid death".

    Every commentator just spins it to suit their own narrarive, as you
    have just done.

    Bill.

    As I said earlier, but you deleted:
    "Yes the excess deaths were taken into account - the startling reality
    for the rest of the world was that for a considerable period, those
    excess deaths were _negative_ - in other words we experienced lower
    deaths due to fewer Covid deaths than other countries, but the
    precautions also reducing deaths from other causes such as road
    accidents and influenza."

    One of the statistics that we can track very accurately is deaths -
    deaths are usually noticed fairly quickly, and are required to be
    reported fairly quickly. With that data we have other information
    about those that have died such as their age.

    So one of the international comparisons was to look at the statistics
    for deaths based on the age of death, and compare predictions based on
    the death rates for each age in the year prior to Covid. They could
    also look at other causes of death - for example we know that the
    number of road deaths reduced because of the lockdowns - but the
    numbers were very small. At that time, some countries were
    experiencing very high rates of death from Covid - they were
    bulldozing trenches for dead bodies in some places!

    Now lockdowns did also reduce road deaths in New Zealand - but the
    number was very small - not enough to significantly change overall
    death rates significantly. We did see some groups of death from
    spreader events - when Covid was carried to a couple of rest homes for >example, or to some church services where people were gathered close >together, and those were investigated quickly and further gatherings >discouraged, but most significantly visits to hospitals and rest homes
    and hospices were reduced by either not permitting visitors or
    insisting on a clear Covid test when those became available.

    The reduction in influenza and other respiratory diseases through
    those precautions was significant - it was more significant than
    actual Covid related deaths, and we saw a reduction in overall rates
    of death for quite some time.

    In international comparisons covering the Covid period on that basis,
    New Zealand did better than nearly every other country, and I have
    posted the link to those statistics a number of times. Our rates of
    death from Covid have increased - they are apparently around 1000 a
    year, and we are on our sixth variant; with new variants arriving
    about every 5 to 6 months. That may well be because the rate of
    vaccination has reduced - it is no longer free for all, and some
    idiots refuse to be vaccinated even if it is free for them (there was
    a big increase in hospitalisations during the parliamentary protests -
    many of those having not been vaccinated).

    Some countries are still experiencing much higher death rates than
    pre-Covid; we are not.

    So yes it is possible to get accurate statistics without having to
    rely on recorded cause of death - but we have a fairly good idea as to
    how many deaths are caused by Covid - some are obvious; although it
    may be harder to keep Covid influenced deaths separate from other
    causes as we get more cases of "long Covid" - that is largely for the
    future however . . .
    You can spin it any way your choose. The fact is we have not been given all of the data. Fact, not supposition, not anything but the truth.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Mon Oct 14 21:38:25 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 18:47:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 06:19:41 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 02:50:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 13 Oct 2024 23:57:04 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2024-10-12, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/530545/jacinda-ardern-to-receive-damehood-from-prince-william-at-windsor-castle-investiture-ceremony

    Ardern's official citation listed her leadership in response to the 15
    March terrorist attacks and the Covid-19 pandemic "positioning New >>>>>>>>> Zealand as having one of the lowest Covid-19 related death rates in >>>>>>>>> the Western world".

    It is such a pity that in circumstances such as this that the other >>>>>>>>achievements are not recognised.

    Or even take into account the excess deaths.

    Yes the excess deaths were taken into account - the startling reality >>>>>>>for the rest of the world was that for a considerable period, those >>>>>>>excess deaths were _negative_ - in other words we experienced lower >>>>>>>deaths due to fewer Covid deaths than other countries, but the >>>>>>>precautions also reducing deaths from other causes such as road >>>>>>>accidents and influenza. But you are correct there are a number of >>>>>>>other achievements that could have also been highlighted.
    Keep peddling your lies. They will haunt you one day. Oh, and my spelling >>>>>>is
    correct, just teaching you some good gerund form.

    There were no lies in what I said - so I have not peddled any lies - >>>>>making your statement a lie . . .,
    If only you had not lied. But you did. More than once.
    No, yo are again wrong - you cannot identify a lie so just make shit
    up - anything to avoid recognising the reason Jacinda Ardern is
    receiving a significant honour from Prince William.
    Another lie - you cannot help it. Sociopathy does that to people. You need >>help.
    Prince William is doing nothing of the sort - it is from thee NZ government >>and
    the Prince is doing as requested.
    Before the presentation she does not have that honour, afterwards she
    will. Yes some people are referring to her as having already received
    it, but technically the action of Prince William (on behalf of the
    King) is, while symbolic, an important symbol of how seriously this
    award is being taken by both New Zealand and the King.
    The award was and always is, nowadays, approved byu the government. The King simply honours that decision. You are twisting stuff again.

    Ardern was the worst PM we have ever had and history will show that.
    Oh dear - sour grapes from one who is unlikely to ever receive any
    civil award - and a view clearly not shared by most New Zealanders or
    those outside New Zealand, including our government and the Royal
    Family.
    And clearly you are biased. I have no sour grapes, my rewards are already in place. I, unlike you, have not wasted my life on trivia.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Tue Oct 15 10:17:48 2024
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 18:47:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 06:19:41 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 02:50:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 13 Oct 2024 23:57:04 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    On 2024-10-12, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/530545/jacinda-ardern-to-receive-damehood-from-prince-william-at-windsor-castle-investiture-ceremony

    Ardern's official citation listed her leadership in response to the 15 >>>>>>>> March terrorist attacks and the Covid-19 pandemic "positioning New >>>>>>>> Zealand as having one of the lowest Covid-19 related death rates in >>>>>>>> the Western world".

    It is such a pity that in circumstances such as this that the other >>>>>>>achievements are not recognised.

    Or even take into account the excess deaths.

    Yes the excess deaths were taken into account - the startling reality >>>>>>for the rest of the world was that for a considerable period, those >>>>>>excess deaths were _negative_ - in other words we experienced lower >>>>>>deaths due to fewer Covid deaths than other countries, but the >>>>>>precautions also reducing deaths from other causes such as road >>>>>>accidents and influenza. But you are correct there are a number of >>>>>>other achievements that could have also been highlighted.
    Keep peddling your lies. They will haunt you one day. Oh, and my spelling >>>>>is
    correct, just teaching you some good gerund form.

    There were no lies in what I said - so I have not peddled any lies - >>>>making your statement a lie . . .,
    If only you had not lied. But you did. More than once.
    No, yo are again wrong - you cannot identify a lie so just make shit
    up - anything to avoid recognising the reason Jacinda Ardern is
    receiving a significant honour from Prince William.
    Another lie - you cannot help it. Sociopathy does that to people. You need help.
    Prince William is doing nothing of the sort - it is from thee NZ government and
    the Prince is doing as requested.
    Before the presentation she does not have that honour, afterwards she
    will. Yes some people are referring to her as having already received
    it, but technically the action of Prince William (on behalf of the
    King) is, while symbolic, an important symbol of how seriously this
    award is being taken by both New Zealand and the King.

    Ardern was the worst PM we have ever had and history will show that.
    Oh dear - sour grapes from one who is unlikely to ever receive any
    civil award - and a view clearly not shared by most New Zealanders or
    those outside New Zealand, including our government and the Royal
    Family.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Tue Oct 15 01:40:21 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 21:38:25 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 18:47:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 06:19:41 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 02:50:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 13 Oct 2024 23:57:04 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>>>
    On 2024-10-12, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/530545/jacinda-ardern-to-receive-damehood-from-prince-william-at-windsor-castle-investiture-ceremony

    Ardern's official citation listed her leadership in response to the >>>>>>>>>>>15
    March terrorist attacks and the Covid-19 pandemic "positioning New >>>>>>>>>>> Zealand as having one of the lowest Covid-19 related death rates in >>>>>>>>>>> the Western world".

    It is such a pity that in circumstances such as this that the other >>>>>>>>>>achievements are not recognised.

    Or even take into account the excess deaths.

    Yes the excess deaths were taken into account - the startling reality >>>>>>>>>for the rest of the world was that for a considerable period, those >>>>>>>>>excess deaths were _negative_ - in other words we experienced lower >>>>>>>>>deaths due to fewer Covid deaths than other countries, but the >>>>>>>>>precautions also reducing deaths from other causes such as road >>>>>>>>>accidents and influenza. But you are correct there are a number of >>>>>>>>>other achievements that could have also been highlighted.
    Keep peddling your lies. They will haunt you one day. Oh, and my >>>>>>>>spelling
    is
    correct, just teaching you some good gerund form.

    There were no lies in what I said - so I have not peddled any lies - >>>>>>>making your statement a lie . . .,
    If only you had not lied. But you did. More than once.
    No, yo are again wrong - you cannot identify a lie so just make shit >>>>>up - anything to avoid recognising the reason Jacinda Ardern is >>>>>receiving a significant honour from Prince William.
    Another lie - you cannot help it. Sociopathy does that to people. You need >>>>help.
    Prince William is doing nothing of the sort - it is from thee NZ government >>>>and
    the Prince is doing as requested.
    Before the presentation she does not have that honour, afterwards she >>>will. Yes some people are referring to her as having already received
    it, but technically the action of Prince William (on behalf of the
    King) is, while symbolic, an important symbol of how seriously this
    award is being taken by both New Zealand and the King.
    The award was and always is, nowadays, approved byu the government.
    Never disputed - and byu should presumably be just by . . .

    The King simply honours that decision. You are twisting stuff again. >Delegated in this case to Prince William - do catch up Tony!

    No twisting at all - were you not aware that most Awards are presented
    by the Governor General?
    I was, you just needed to be taught. You have now learned.
    You did dispute the authority but now apparently you have learned that also. Problem is, how long before it escapes your brain once more..



    Ardern was the worst PM we have ever had and history will show that.
    Oh dear - sour grapes from one who is unlikely to ever receive any
    civil award - and a view clearly not shared by most New Zealanders or >>>those outside New Zealand, including our government and the Royal
    Family.
    And clearly you are biased. I have no sour grapes, my rewards are already in >>place. I, unlike you, have not wasted my life on trivia.
    So you are just wasting your life with trivia now are you Tony - what
    made you change your mind? You appear to be implying that you have
    received a civic award . . . which one?
    I am implyingh nothing, you are twisting stuff again. Get a life little boy. Trivia is your life not mine.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Crash@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 15 15:12:01 2024
    On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 14:31:17 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 21:38:25 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 18:47:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 06:19:41 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 02:50:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 13 Oct 2024 23:57:04 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>>>
    On 2024-10-12, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/530545/jacinda-ardern-to-receive-damehood-from-prince-william-at-windsor-castle-investiture-ceremony

    Ardern's official citation listed her leadership in response to the 15
    March terrorist attacks and the Covid-19 pandemic "positioning New >>>>>>>>>>> Zealand as having one of the lowest Covid-19 related death rates in >>>>>>>>>>> the Western world".

    It is such a pity that in circumstances such as this that the other >>>>>>>>>>achievements are not recognised.

    Or even take into account the excess deaths.

    Yes the excess deaths were taken into account - the startling reality >>>>>>>>>for the rest of the world was that for a considerable period, those >>>>>>>>>excess deaths were _negative_ - in other words we experienced lower >>>>>>>>>deaths due to fewer Covid deaths than other countries, but the >>>>>>>>>precautions also reducing deaths from other causes such as road >>>>>>>>>accidents and influenza. But you are correct there are a number of >>>>>>>>>other achievements that could have also been highlighted.
    Keep peddling your lies. They will haunt you one day. Oh, and my spelling
    is
    correct, just teaching you some good gerund form.

    There were no lies in what I said - so I have not peddled any lies - >>>>>>>making your statement a lie . . .,
    If only you had not lied. But you did. More than once.
    No, yo are again wrong - you cannot identify a lie so just make shit >>>>>up - anything to avoid recognising the reason Jacinda Ardern is >>>>>receiving a significant honour from Prince William.
    Another lie - you cannot help it. Sociopathy does that to people. You need >>>>help.
    Prince William is doing nothing of the sort - it is from thee NZ government >>>>and
    the Prince is doing as requested.
    Before the presentation she does not have that honour, afterwards she >>>will. Yes some people are referring to her as having already received
    it, but technically the action of Prince William (on behalf of the
    King) is, while symbolic, an important symbol of how seriously this
    award is being taken by both New Zealand and the King.
    The award was and always is, nowadays, approved byu the government.
    Never disputed - and byu should presumably be just by . . .

    The King simply honours that decision. You are twisting stuff again. >Delegated in this case to Prince William - do catch up Tony!

    No twisting at all - were you not aware that most Awards are presented
    by the Governor General?



    Ardern was the worst PM we have ever had and history will show that.
    Oh dear - sour grapes from one who is unlikely to ever receive any
    civil award - and a view clearly not shared by most New Zealanders or >>>those outside New Zealand, including our government and the Royal
    Family.
    And clearly you are biased. I have no sour grapes, my rewards are already in >>place. I, unlike you, have not wasted my life on trivia.
    So you are just wasting your life with trivia now are you Tony - what
    made you change your mind? You appear to be implying that you have
    received a civic award . . . which one?

    Rich, how on earth can you be confused between rewards (as Tony
    referenced) and awards (civic or otherwise)? Ok I get it - just
    another example of your habitual verbal gymnastics.


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Tue Oct 15 14:39:29 2024
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 21:36:01 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 06:00:27 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:42:51 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:

    in other words we experienced lower deaths due to fewer Covid deaths than >>>>other countries,

    It is impossible to get accurate statistics on any of this because
    there was so much ambiguity around what constitutes a "covid death".

    Every commentator just spins it to suit their own narrarive, as you
    have just done.

    Bill.

    As I said earlier, but you deleted:
    "Yes the excess deaths were taken into account - the startling reality
    for the rest of the world was that for a considerable period, those
    excess deaths were _negative_ - in other words we experienced lower
    deaths due to fewer Covid deaths than other countries, but the
    precautions also reducing deaths from other causes such as road
    accidents and influenza."

    One of the statistics that we can track very accurately is deaths -
    deaths are usually noticed fairly quickly, and are required to be
    reported fairly quickly. With that data we have other information
    about those that have died such as their age.

    So one of the international comparisons was to look at the statistics
    for deaths based on the age of death, and compare predictions based on
    the death rates for each age in the year prior to Covid. They could
    also look at other causes of death - for example we know that the
    number of road deaths reduced because of the lockdowns - but the
    numbers were very small. At that time, some countries were
    experiencing very high rates of death from Covid - they were
    bulldozing trenches for dead bodies in some places!

    Now lockdowns did also reduce road deaths in New Zealand - but the
    number was very small - not enough to significantly change overall
    death rates significantly. We did see some groups of death from
    spreader events - when Covid was carried to a couple of rest homes for >>example, or to some church services where people were gathered close >>together, and those were investigated quickly and further gatherings >>discouraged, but most significantly visits to hospitals and rest homes
    and hospices were reduced by either not permitting visitors or
    insisting on a clear Covid test when those became available.

    The reduction in influenza and other respiratory diseases through
    those precautions was significant - it was more significant than
    actual Covid related deaths, and we saw a reduction in overall rates
    of death for quite some time.

    In international comparisons covering the Covid period on that basis,
    New Zealand did better than nearly every other country, and I have
    posted the link to those statistics a number of times. Our rates of
    death from Covid have increased - they are apparently around 1000 a
    year, and we are on our sixth variant; with new variants arriving
    about every 5 to 6 months. That may well be because the rate of
    vaccination has reduced - it is no longer free for all, and some
    idiots refuse to be vaccinated even if it is free for them (there was
    a big increase in hospitalisations during the parliamentary protests -
    many of those having not been vaccinated).

    Some countries are still experiencing much higher death rates than >>pre-Covid; we are not.

    So yes it is possible to get accurate statistics without having to
    rely on recorded cause of death - but we have a fairly good idea as to
    how many deaths are caused by Covid - some are obvious; although it
    may be harder to keep Covid influenced deaths separate from other
    causes as we get more cases of "long Covid" - that is largely for the >>future however . . .
    You can spin it any way your choose. The fact is we have not been given all of >the data. Fact, not supposition, not anything but the truth.

    For once you are absolutely correct - no you will not be told all the
    data or facts about Covid deaths, Tony. Just imagine if a relative of
    yours died after having caught Covid attending the nutter protests at parliament - would you want the names of those that died around that
    time to have been published? It did not happen under the government
    then and still wont happen. In fact, the current government has kept
    most of the policies put in place by the previous government - there
    are still recommendations based on the best scientific advice the
    government receives to keep updated on vaccinations, and to be careful
    around those that have Covid to avoid it spreading. No changes to the
    release of data, but the data on deaths does not include those privacy
    issues - it is still being collected, but our performance has
    deteriorated - with deaths current at around 1000 a year they have
    increased on recent years, and quite possible increased in the last
    year. What facts are you claiming that the Coalition Government is
    keeping from you, Tony?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Tue Oct 15 14:31:17 2024
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 21:38:25 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 18:47:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 06:19:41 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 02:50:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 13 Oct 2024 23:57:04 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>>
    On 2024-10-12, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/530545/jacinda-ardern-to-receive-damehood-from-prince-william-at-windsor-castle-investiture-ceremony

    Ardern's official citation listed her leadership in response to the 15
    March terrorist attacks and the Covid-19 pandemic "positioning New >>>>>>>>>> Zealand as having one of the lowest Covid-19 related death rates in >>>>>>>>>> the Western world".

    It is such a pity that in circumstances such as this that the other >>>>>>>>>achievements are not recognised.

    Or even take into account the excess deaths.

    Yes the excess deaths were taken into account - the startling reality >>>>>>>>for the rest of the world was that for a considerable period, those >>>>>>>>excess deaths were _negative_ - in other words we experienced lower >>>>>>>>deaths due to fewer Covid deaths than other countries, but the >>>>>>>>precautions also reducing deaths from other causes such as road >>>>>>>>accidents and influenza. But you are correct there are a number of >>>>>>>>other achievements that could have also been highlighted.
    Keep peddling your lies. They will haunt you one day. Oh, and my spelling
    is
    correct, just teaching you some good gerund form.

    There were no lies in what I said - so I have not peddled any lies - >>>>>>making your statement a lie . . .,
    If only you had not lied. But you did. More than once.
    No, yo are again wrong - you cannot identify a lie so just make shit
    up - anything to avoid recognising the reason Jacinda Ardern is >>>>receiving a significant honour from Prince William.
    Another lie - you cannot help it. Sociopathy does that to people. You need >>>help.
    Prince William is doing nothing of the sort - it is from thee NZ government >>>and
    the Prince is doing as requested.
    Before the presentation she does not have that honour, afterwards she
    will. Yes some people are referring to her as having already received
    it, but technically the action of Prince William (on behalf of the
    King) is, while symbolic, an important symbol of how seriously this
    award is being taken by both New Zealand and the King.
    The award was and always is, nowadays, approved byu the government.
    Never disputed - and byu should presumably be just by . . .

    The King simply honours that decision. You are twisting stuff again.
    Delegated in this case to Prince William - do catch up Tony!

    No twisting at all - were you not aware that most Awards are presented
    by the Governor General?



    Ardern was the worst PM we have ever had and history will show that.
    Oh dear - sour grapes from one who is unlikely to ever receive any
    civil award - and a view clearly not shared by most New Zealanders or
    those outside New Zealand, including our government and the Royal
    Family.
    And clearly you are biased. I have no sour grapes, my rewards are already in >place. I, unlike you, have not wasted my life on trivia.
    So you are just wasting your life with trivia now are you Tony - what
    made you change your mind? You appear to be implying that you have
    received a civic award . . . which one?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Tue Oct 15 02:27:18 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 21:36:01 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 06:00:27 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 14:42:51 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:

    in other words we experienced lower deaths due to fewer Covid deaths than >>>>>other countries,

    It is impossible to get accurate statistics on any of this because >>>>there was so much ambiguity around what constitutes a "covid death".

    Every commentator just spins it to suit their own narrarive, as you >>>>have just done.

    Bill.

    As I said earlier, but you deleted:
    "Yes the excess deaths were taken into account - the startling reality >>>for the rest of the world was that for a considerable period, those >>>excess deaths were _negative_ - in other words we experienced lower >>>deaths due to fewer Covid deaths than other countries, but the >>>precautions also reducing deaths from other causes such as road
    accidents and influenza."

    One of the statistics that we can track very accurately is deaths - >>>deaths are usually noticed fairly quickly, and are required to be >>>reported fairly quickly. With that data we have other information
    about those that have died such as their age.

    So one of the international comparisons was to look at the statistics
    for deaths based on the age of death, and compare predictions based on >>>the death rates for each age in the year prior to Covid. They could
    also look at other causes of death - for example we know that the
    number of road deaths reduced because of the lockdowns - but the
    numbers were very small. At that time, some countries were
    experiencing very high rates of death from Covid - they were
    bulldozing trenches for dead bodies in some places!

    Now lockdowns did also reduce road deaths in New Zealand - but the
    number was very small - not enough to significantly change overall
    death rates significantly. We did see some groups of death from
    spreader events - when Covid was carried to a couple of rest homes for >>>example, or to some church services where people were gathered close >>>together, and those were investigated quickly and further gatherings >>>discouraged, but most significantly visits to hospitals and rest homes >>>and hospices were reduced by either not permitting visitors or
    insisting on a clear Covid test when those became available.

    The reduction in influenza and other respiratory diseases through
    those precautions was significant - it was more significant than
    actual Covid related deaths, and we saw a reduction in overall rates
    of death for quite some time.

    In international comparisons covering the Covid period on that basis,
    New Zealand did better than nearly every other country, and I have
    posted the link to those statistics a number of times. Our rates of
    death from Covid have increased - they are apparently around 1000 a
    year, and we are on our sixth variant; with new variants arriving
    about every 5 to 6 months. That may well be because the rate of >>>vaccination has reduced - it is no longer free for all, and some
    idiots refuse to be vaccinated even if it is free for them (there was
    a big increase in hospitalisations during the parliamentary protests - >>>many of those having not been vaccinated).

    Some countries are still experiencing much higher death rates than >>>pre-Covid; we are not.

    So yes it is possible to get accurate statistics without having to
    rely on recorded cause of death - but we have a fairly good idea as to >>>how many deaths are caused by Covid - some are obvious; although it
    may be harder to keep Covid influenced deaths separate from other
    causes as we get more cases of "long Covid" - that is largely for the >>>future however . . .
    You can spin it any way your choose. The fact is we have not been given all >>of
    the data. Fact, not supposition, not anything but the truth.

    For once you are absolutely correct - no you will not be told all the
    data or facts about Covid deaths, Tony. Just imagine if a relative of
    yours died after having caught Covid attending the nutter protests at >parliament - would you want the names of those that died around that
    time to have been published? It did not happen under the government
    then and still wont happen. In fact, the current government has kept
    most of the policies put in place by the previous government - there
    are still recommendations based on the best scientific advice the
    government receives to keep updated on vaccinations, and to be careful
    around those that have Covid to avoid it spreading. No changes to the
    release of data, but the data on deaths does not include those privacy
    issues - it is still being collected, but our performance has
    deteriorated - with deaths current at around 1000 a year they have
    increased on recent years, and quite possible increased in the last
    year. What facts are you claiming that the Coalition Government is
    keeping from you, Tony?
    What garbage,
    The last government and this givernment have not issued all of the data about covid. You know that, I know that, even your imaginary friends know that.
    And that is all I said.
    Your verbose crap is a waste of time and off topic..

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 15 15:43:34 2024
    On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 15:12:01 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 14:31:17 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 21:38:25 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 18:47:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 06:19:41 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 02:50:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 13 Oct 2024 23:57:04 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>
    On 2024-10-12, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/530545/jacinda-ardern-to-receive-damehood-from-prince-william-at-windsor-castle-investiture-ceremony

    Ardern's official citation listed her leadership in response to the 15
    March terrorist attacks and the Covid-19 pandemic "positioning New >>>>>>>>>>>> Zealand as having one of the lowest Covid-19 related death rates in
    the Western world".

    It is such a pity that in circumstances such as this that the other >>>>>>>>>>>achievements are not recognised.

    Or even take into account the excess deaths.

    Yes the excess deaths were taken into account - the startling reality >>>>>>>>>>for the rest of the world was that for a considerable period, those >>>>>>>>>>excess deaths were _negative_ - in other words we experienced lower >>>>>>>>>>deaths due to fewer Covid deaths than other countries, but the >>>>>>>>>>precautions also reducing deaths from other causes such as road >>>>>>>>>>accidents and influenza. But you are correct there are a number of >>>>>>>>>>other achievements that could have also been highlighted. >>>>>>>>>Keep peddling your lies. They will haunt you one day. Oh, and my spelling
    is
    correct, just teaching you some good gerund form.

    There were no lies in what I said - so I have not peddled any lies - >>>>>>>>making your statement a lie . . .,
    If only you had not lied. But you did. More than once.
    No, yo are again wrong - you cannot identify a lie so just make shit >>>>>>up - anything to avoid recognising the reason Jacinda Ardern is >>>>>>receiving a significant honour from Prince William.
    Another lie - you cannot help it. Sociopathy does that to people. You need >>>>>help.
    Prince William is doing nothing of the sort - it is from thee NZ government
    and
    the Prince is doing as requested.
    Before the presentation she does not have that honour, afterwards she >>>>will. Yes some people are referring to her as having already received >>>>it, but technically the action of Prince William (on behalf of the >>>>King) is, while symbolic, an important symbol of how seriously this >>>>award is being taken by both New Zealand and the King.
    The award was and always is, nowadays, approved byu the government.
    Never disputed - and byu should presumably be just by . . .

    The King simply honours that decision. You are twisting stuff again. >>Delegated in this case to Prince William - do catch up Tony!

    No twisting at all - were you not aware that most Awards are presented
    by the Governor General?



    Ardern was the worst PM we have ever had and history will show that. >>>>Oh dear - sour grapes from one who is unlikely to ever receive any >>>>civil award - and a view clearly not shared by most New Zealanders or >>>>those outside New Zealand, including our government and the Royal >>>>Family.
    And clearly you are biased. I have no sour grapes, my rewards are already in >>>place. I, unlike you, have not wasted my life on trivia.
    So you are just wasting your life with trivia now are you Tony - what
    made you change your mind? You appear to be implying that you have >>received a civic award . . . which one?

    Rich, how on earth can you be confused between rewards (as Tony
    referenced) and awards (civic or otherwise)? Ok I get it - just
    another example of your habitual verbal gymnastics.

    No, Tony introduced the word reward in a discussion about one
    particular Award; I was merely asking if it was relevant to the
    discussion and he has not responded - what do you think he meant,
    Crash?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Tue Oct 15 06:17:59 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 15:12:01 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 14:31:17 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:

    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 21:38:25 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 18:47:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 06:19:41 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 02:50:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 13 Oct 2024 23:57:04 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>
    On 2024-10-12, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/530545/jacinda-ardern-to-receive-damehood-from-prince-william-at-windsor-castle-investiture-ceremony

    Ardern's official citation listed her leadership in response to >>>>>>>>>>>>>the 15
    March terrorist attacks and the Covid-19 pandemic "positioning New
    Zealand as having one of the lowest Covid-19 related death rates >>>>>>>>>>>>>in
    the Western world".

    It is such a pity that in circumstances such as this that the other >>>>>>>>>>>>achievements are not recognised.

    Or even take into account the excess deaths.

    Yes the excess deaths were taken into account - the startling reality
    for the rest of the world was that for a considerable period, those >>>>>>>>>>>excess deaths were _negative_ - in other words we experienced lower >>>>>>>>>>>deaths due to fewer Covid deaths than other countries, but the >>>>>>>>>>>precautions also reducing deaths from other causes such as road >>>>>>>>>>>accidents and influenza. But you are correct there are a number of >>>>>>>>>>>other achievements that could have also been highlighted. >>>>>>>>>>Keep peddling your lies. They will haunt you one day. Oh, and my >>>>>>>>>>spelling
    is
    correct, just teaching you some good gerund form.

    There were no lies in what I said - so I have not peddled any lies - >>>>>>>>>making your statement a lie . . .,
    If only you had not lied. But you did. More than once.
    No, yo are again wrong - you cannot identify a lie so just make shit >>>>>>>up - anything to avoid recognising the reason Jacinda Ardern is >>>>>>>receiving a significant honour from Prince William.
    Another lie - you cannot help it. Sociopathy does that to people. You >>>>>>need
    help.
    Prince William is doing nothing of the sort - it is from thee NZ >>>>>>government
    and
    the Prince is doing as requested.
    Before the presentation she does not have that honour, afterwards she >>>>>will. Yes some people are referring to her as having already received >>>>>it, but technically the action of Prince William (on behalf of the >>>>>King) is, while symbolic, an important symbol of how seriously this >>>>>award is being taken by both New Zealand and the King.
    The award was and always is, nowadays, approved byu the government. >>>Never disputed - and byu should presumably be just by . . .

    The King simply honours that decision. You are twisting stuff again. >>>Delegated in this case to Prince William - do catch up Tony!

    No twisting at all - were you not aware that most Awards are presented
    by the Governor General?



    Ardern was the worst PM we have ever had and history will show that. >>>>>Oh dear - sour grapes from one who is unlikely to ever receive any >>>>>civil award - and a view clearly not shared by most New Zealanders or >>>>>those outside New Zealand, including our government and the Royal >>>>>Family.
    And clearly you are biased. I have no sour grapes, my rewards are already >>>>in
    place. I, unlike you, have not wasted my life on trivia.
    So you are just wasting your life with trivia now are you Tony - what >>>made you change your mind? You appear to be implying that you have >>>received a civic award . . . which one?

    Rich, how on earth can you be confused between rewards (as Tony
    referenced) and awards (civic or otherwise)? Ok I get it - just
    another example of your habitual verbal gymnastics.

    No, Tony introduced the word reward in a discussion about one
    particular Award; I was merely asking if it was relevant to the
    discussion and he has not responded - what do you think he meant,
    Crash?
    I have responded, a few hours ago.
    I wrote "I am implying nothing, you are twisting stuff again. Get a life little boy.
    Trivia is your life not mine."
    Why are you such a childish liar? Sociopathy, stupidity or just plain nastiness?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Wed Oct 16 11:22:59 2024
    On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 06:17:59 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 15:12:01 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>wrote:

    On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 14:31:17 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:

    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 21:38:25 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 18:47:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 06:19:41 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 02:50:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 13 Oct 2024 23:57:04 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>
    On 2024-10-12, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/530545/jacinda-ardern-to-receive-damehood-from-prince-william-at-windsor-castle-investiture-ceremony

    Ardern's official citation listed her leadership in response to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>the 15
    March terrorist attacks and the Covid-19 pandemic "positioning New
    Zealand as having one of the lowest Covid-19 related death rates >>>>>>>>>>>>>>in
    the Western world".

    It is such a pity that in circumstances such as this that the other
    achievements are not recognised.

    Or even take into account the excess deaths.

    Yes the excess deaths were taken into account - the startling reality
    for the rest of the world was that for a considerable period, those >>>>>>>>>>>>excess deaths were _negative_ - in other words we experienced lower >>>>>>>>>>>>deaths due to fewer Covid deaths than other countries, but the >>>>>>>>>>>>precautions also reducing deaths from other causes such as road >>>>>>>>>>>>accidents and influenza. But you are correct there are a number of >>>>>>>>>>>>other achievements that could have also been highlighted. >>>>>>>>>>>Keep peddling your lies. They will haunt you one day. Oh, and my >>>>>>>>>>>spelling
    is
    correct, just teaching you some good gerund form.

    There were no lies in what I said - so I have not peddled any lies - >>>>>>>>>>making your statement a lie . . .,
    If only you had not lied. But you did. More than once.
    No, yo are again wrong - you cannot identify a lie so just make shit >>>>>>>>up - anything to avoid recognising the reason Jacinda Ardern is >>>>>>>>receiving a significant honour from Prince William.
    Another lie - you cannot help it. Sociopathy does that to people. You >>>>>>>need
    help.
    Prince William is doing nothing of the sort - it is from thee NZ >>>>>>>government
    and
    the Prince is doing as requested.
    Before the presentation she does not have that honour, afterwards she >>>>>>will. Yes some people are referring to her as having already received >>>>>>it, but technically the action of Prince William (on behalf of the >>>>>>King) is, while symbolic, an important symbol of how seriously this >>>>>>award is being taken by both New Zealand and the King.
    The award was and always is, nowadays, approved byu the government. >>>>Never disputed - and byu should presumably be just by . . .

    The King simply honours that decision. You are twisting stuff again. >>>>Delegated in this case to Prince William - do catch up Tony!

    No twisting at all - were you not aware that most Awards are presented >>>>by the Governor General?



    Ardern was the worst PM we have ever had and history will show that. >>>>>>Oh dear - sour grapes from one who is unlikely to ever receive any >>>>>>civil award - and a view clearly not shared by most New Zealanders or >>>>>>those outside New Zealand, including our government and the Royal >>>>>>Family.
    And clearly you are biased. I have no sour grapes, my rewards are already >>>>>in
    place. I, unlike you, have not wasted my life on trivia.
    So you are just wasting your life with trivia now are you Tony - what >>>>made you change your mind? You appear to be implying that you have >>>>received a civic award . . . which one?

    Rich, how on earth can you be confused between rewards (as Tony >>>referenced) and awards (civic or otherwise)? Ok I get it - just
    another example of your habitual verbal gymnastics.

    No, Tony introduced the word reward in a discussion about one
    particular Award; I was merely asking if it was relevant to the
    discussion and he has not responded - what do you think he meant,
    Crash?
    I have responded, a few hours ago.
    I wrote "I am implying nothing, you are twisting stuff again. Get a life little
    boy.
    Trivia is your life not mine."
    Why are you such a childish liar? Sociopathy, stupidity or just plain nastiness?

    Your lack of comprehension comes to the fore yet again, Tony. I was
    responding to a specific comment addressed to me from Crash - but
    while your post was typically nasty, I am glad that you now accept you
    were wrong to berate posters for responding to the group rather than
    to specific individuals.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Tue Oct 15 23:29:54 2024
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 06:17:59 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 15:12:01 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>wrote:

    On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 14:31:17 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:

    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 21:38:25 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 18:47:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 06:19:41 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 02:50:54 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 13 Oct 2024 23:57:04 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    On 2024-10-12, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/530545/jacinda-ardern-to-receive-damehood-from-prince-william-at-windsor-castle-investiture-ceremony

    Ardern's official citation listed her leadership in response to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>the 15
    March terrorist attacks and the Covid-19 pandemic "positioning >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>New
    Zealand as having one of the lowest Covid-19 related death >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>rates
    in
    the Western world".

    It is such a pity that in circumstances such as this that the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>other
    achievements are not recognised.

    Or even take into account the excess deaths.

    Yes the excess deaths were taken into account - the startling >>>>>>>>>>>>>reality
    for the rest of the world was that for a considerable period, those
    excess deaths were _negative_ - in other words we experienced lower
    deaths due to fewer Covid deaths than other countries, but the >>>>>>>>>>>>>precautions also reducing deaths from other causes such as road >>>>>>>>>>>>>accidents and influenza. But you are correct there are a number of
    other achievements that could have also been highlighted. >>>>>>>>>>>>Keep peddling your lies. They will haunt you one day. Oh, and my >>>>>>>>>>>>spelling
    is
    correct, just teaching you some good gerund form.

    There were no lies in what I said - so I have not peddled any lies - >>>>>>>>>>>making your statement a lie . . .,
    If only you had not lied. But you did. More than once.
    No, yo are again wrong - you cannot identify a lie so just make shit >>>>>>>>>up - anything to avoid recognising the reason Jacinda Ardern is >>>>>>>>>receiving a significant honour from Prince William.
    Another lie - you cannot help it. Sociopathy does that to people. You >>>>>>>>need
    help.
    Prince William is doing nothing of the sort - it is from thee NZ >>>>>>>>government
    and
    the Prince is doing as requested.
    Before the presentation she does not have that honour, afterwards she >>>>>>>will. Yes some people are referring to her as having already received >>>>>>>it, but technically the action of Prince William (on behalf of the >>>>>>>King) is, while symbolic, an important symbol of how seriously this >>>>>>>award is being taken by both New Zealand and the King.
    The award was and always is, nowadays, approved byu the government. >>>>>Never disputed - and byu should presumably be just by . . .

    The King simply honours that decision. You are twisting stuff again. >>>>>Delegated in this case to Prince William - do catch up Tony!

    No twisting at all - were you not aware that most Awards are presented >>>>>by the Governor General?



    Ardern was the worst PM we have ever had and history will show that. >>>>>>>Oh dear - sour grapes from one who is unlikely to ever receive any >>>>>>>civil award - and a view clearly not shared by most New Zealanders or >>>>>>>those outside New Zealand, including our government and the Royal >>>>>>>Family.
    And clearly you are biased. I have no sour grapes, my rewards are already >>>>>>in
    place. I, unlike you, have not wasted my life on trivia.
    So you are just wasting your life with trivia now are you Tony - what >>>>>made you change your mind? You appear to be implying that you have >>>>>received a civic award . . . which one?

    Rich, how on earth can you be confused between rewards (as Tony >>>>referenced) and awards (civic or otherwise)? Ok I get it - just >>>>another example of your habitual verbal gymnastics.

    No, Tony introduced the word reward in a discussion about one
    particular Award; I was merely asking if it was relevant to the >>>discussion and he has not responded - what do you think he meant,
    Crash?
    I have responded, a few hours ago.
    I wrote "I am implying nothing, you are twisting stuff again. Get a life >>little
    boy.
    Trivia is your life not mine."
    Why are you such a childish liar? Sociopathy, stupidity or just plain >>nastiness?

    Your lack of comprehension comes to the fore yet again, Tony. I was >responding to a specific comment addressed to me from Crash - but
    while your post was typically nasty, I am glad that you now accept you
    were wrong to berate posters for responding to the group rather than
    to specific individuals.
    No. I responed directly to you. Read what I wrote and argue otherwise. You cannot. You really are a loser.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)