https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/532196/moving-back-speed-limits-new-school-signage-may-cost-25m-at

First off I am sure that putting all these unwanted signs cost some money.
The fact that it will cost more to be removed only shows that this was
another idea which has been a failure by the previous Labour Government.

Never wanted by the public at large and cetainly not thought through. Just another control of the masses.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 29 Oct 2024 06:54:17 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/532196/moving-back-speed-limits-new-school-signage-may-cost-25m-at

First off I am sure that putting all these unwanted signs cost some money. >The fact that it will cost more to be removed only shows that this was >another idea which has been a failure by the previous Labour Government.

Never wanted by the public at large and cetainly not thought through. Just >another control of the masses.

Agreed. Where the new speed limits were imposed without consultation
and without statistical justification for the areas concerned, the
cost of remediation is a cost imposed by the unconsulted and
unjustified changes made.


--
Crash McBash

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 20:30:12 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:

On 29 Oct 2024 06:54:17 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/532196/moving-back-speed-limits-new-school-signage-may-cost-25m-at

First off I am sure that putting all these unwanted signs cost some money. >>The fact that it will cost more to be removed only shows that this was >>another idea which has been a failure by the previous Labour Government.

Never wanted by the public at large and cetainly not thought through. Just >>another control of the masses.

Agreed. Where the new speed limits were imposed without consultation
and without statistical justification for the areas concerned, the
cost of remediation is a cost imposed by the unconsulted and
unjustified changes made.

I am aware of considerable consultation in quite a few instances, and
concern about the removal of the limits with any consultation - and I
doubt that removing signs is more expensive than installing them,
except for those that ignore the effect of inflation . . .

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 20:30:12 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:

On 29 Oct 2024 06:54:17 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/532196/moving-back-speed-limits-new-school-signage-may-cost-25m-at

First off I am sure that putting all these unwanted signs cost some money. >>>The fact that it will cost more to be removed only shows that this was >>>another idea which has been a failure by the previous Labour Government.

Never wanted by the public at large and cetainly not thought through. Just >>>another control of the masses.

Agreed. Where the new speed limits were imposed without consultation
and without statistical justification for the areas concerned, the
cost of remediation is a cost imposed by the unconsulted and
unjustified changes made.

I am aware of considerable consultation in quite a few instances, and
concern about the removal of the limits with any consultation - and I
doubt that removing signs is more expensive than installing them,
except for those that ignore the effect of inflation . . .

Show us where there was consultation. I am not aware of any. Regardless, the imposition of idiotic permanent speed reductions on main rural highways was nonsense.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)