https://www.bassettbrashandhide.com/post/roger-partridge-can-the-dead-own-property-our-supreme-court-just-said-yes-in-nikora-v-kruger?postId=151fc7af-4ab2-4115-8f2f-4c01ec15ed01&utm_campaign=d1f27818-1baa-4e0d-bf46-f8ac1994c093&utm_source=so&utm_medium=mail&utm_content=761384ff-2887-4761-b726-6a053b84fe64&cid=fcd0df4b-5de5-4aa8-b04d-2e46f8bd660b
It seems the court has taken a very large step beyond precedent and is >tinkering with laws. Judicial overreach? I think so.So the Court is defending sanctity of contract - I can understand why
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:45:03 -0000 (UTC), Tonymail&utm_content=761384ff-2887-4761-b726-6a053b84fe64&cid=fcd0df4b-5de5-4aa8-b04d-2e46f8bd660b
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://www.bassettbrashandhide.com/post/roger-partridge-can-the-dead-own-property-our-supreme-court-just-said-yes-in-nikora-v-kruger?postId=151fc7af-4ab2-4115-8f2f-4c01ec15ed01&utm_campaign=d1f27818-1baa-4e0d-bf46-f8ac1994c093&utm_source=so&utm_medium=
No, you are wrong and you are doing what you always do - defending the indefensible.It seems the court has taken a very large step beyond precedent and is >>tinkering with laws. Judicial overreach? I think so.So the Court is defending sanctity of contract - I can understand why
that is anathema to the Chairman of the NZ Initiative and to Basset,
Brash and Hide . . .
I have often wondered why Richard Prebble is not part of that group -Irrelevant sarcastic garbage.
it will be interesting to see if he is still thinking, and how he
views such politically motivated stupidity as a newly appointed member
of the Waitangi Tribunal.
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:45:03 -0000 (UTC), Tonymail&utm_content=761384ff-2887-4761-b726-6a053b84fe64&cid=fcd0df4b-5de5-4aa8-b04d-2e46f8bd660b
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://www.bassettbrashandhide.com/post/roger-partridge-can-the-dead-own-property-our-supreme-court-just-said-yes-in-nikora-v-kruger?postId=151fc7af-4ab2-4115-8f2f-4c01ec15ed01&utm_campaign=d1f27818-1baa-4e0d-bf46-f8ac1994c093&utm_source=so&utm_medium=
It seems the court has taken a very large step beyond precedent and is >>tinkering with laws. Judicial overreach? I think so.So the Court is defending sanctity of contract
- I can understand why
that is anathema to the Chairman of the NZ Initiative and to Basset,
Brash and Hide . . .
I have often wondered why Richard Prebble is not part of that group -
it will be interesting to see if he is still thinking, and how he
views such politically motivated stupidity as a newly appointed member
of the Waitangi Tribunal.
On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 16:46:59 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>medium=mail&utm_content=761384ff-2887-4761-b726-6a053b84fe64&cid=fcd0df4b-5de5-4aa8-b04d-2e46f8bd660b
wrote:
On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 10:16:46 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:45:03 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://www.bassettbrashandhide.com/post/roger-partridge-can-the-dead-own-property-our-supreme-court-just-said-yes-in-nikora-v-kruger?postId=151fc7af-4ab2-4115-8f2f-4c01ec15ed01&utm_campaign=d1f27818-1baa-4e0d-bf46-f8ac1994c093&utm_source=so&utm_
See: >https://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/07-02-2021/richard-prebble-ive-been-thinking-about-ive-been-thinking-25-years-onIt seems the court has taken a very large step beyond precedent and is >>>>tinkering with laws. Judicial overreach? I think so.So the Court is defending sanctity of contract
No - it is declaring that the principle of extinguished property
rights for those now deceased no longer exists it seems.
- I can understand whyThis is relevant? How? Insulting those you oppose is the last resort
that is anathema to the Chairman of the NZ Initiative and to Basset, >>>Brash and Hide . . .
- when you can no longer sustain your point of view.
I have often wondered why Richard Prebble is not part of that group -
it will be interesting to see if he is still thinking, and how he
views such politically motivated stupidity as a newly appointed member
of the Waitangi Tribunal.
Who is 'he is still thinking'?
(and for Tony's benefit, Prebble believes that he moved from the left
to the right . . . .
On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 10:16:46 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>medium=mail&utm_content=761384ff-2887-4761-b726-6a053b84fe64&cid=fcd0df4b-5de5-4aa8-b04d-2e46f8bd660b
wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:45:03 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://www.bassettbrashandhide.com/post/roger-partridge-can-the-dead-own-property-our-supreme-court-just-said-yes-in-nikora-v-kruger?postId=151fc7af-4ab2-4115-8f2f-4c01ec15ed01&utm_campaign=d1f27818-1baa-4e0d-bf46-f8ac1994c093&utm_source=so&utm_
See: https://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/07-02-2021/richard-prebble-ive-been-thinking-about-ive-been-thinking-25-years-onIt seems the court has taken a very large step beyond precedent and is >>>tinkering with laws. Judicial overreach? I think so.So the Court is defending sanctity of contract
No - it is declaring that the principle of extinguished property
rights for those now deceased no longer exists it seems.
- I can understand whyThis is relevant? How? Insulting those you oppose is the last resort
that is anathema to the Chairman of the NZ Initiative and to Basset,
Brash and Hide . . .
- when you can no longer sustain your point of view.
I have often wondered why Richard Prebble is not part of that group -
it will be interesting to see if he is still thinking, and how he
views such politically motivated stupidity as a newly appointed member
of the Waitangi Tribunal.
Who is 'he is still thinking'?
On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 16:46:59 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>medium=mail&utm_content=761384ff-2887-4761-b726-6a053b84fe64&cid=fcd0df4b-5de5-4aa8-b04d-2e46f8bd660b
wrote:
On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 10:16:46 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 18:45:03 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
https://www.bassettbrashandhide.com/post/roger-partridge-can-the-dead-own-property-our-supreme-court-just-said-yes-in-nikora-v-kruger?postId=151fc7af-4ab2-4115-8f2f-4c01ec15ed01&utm_campaign=d1f27818-1baa-4e0d-bf46-f8ac1994c093&utm_source=so&utm_
Well if he believes that then he is wrong, he is at most centre right - there is no right wing in this government and very little in our political spectrum. However, there is plenty of extreme left - the watermelon party for instance.See: >https://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/07-02-2021/richard-prebble-ive-been-thinking-about-ive-been-thinking-25-years-onIt seems the court has taken a very large step beyond precedent and is >>>>tinkering with laws. Judicial overreach? I think so.So the Court is defending sanctity of contract
No - it is declaring that the principle of extinguished property
rights for those now deceased no longer exists it seems.
- I can understand whyThis is relevant? How? Insulting those you oppose is the last resort
that is anathema to the Chairman of the NZ Initiative and to Basset, >>>Brash and Hide . . .
- when you can no longer sustain your point of view.
I have often wondered why Richard Prebble is not part of that group -
it will be interesting to see if he is still thinking, and how he
views such politically motivated stupidity as a newly appointed member
of the Waitangi Tribunal.
Who is 'he is still thinking'?
(and for Tony's benefit, Prebble believes that he moved from the left
to the right . . . .
https://www.bassettbrashandhide.com/post/roger-partridge-can-the-dead-own-property-our-supreme-court-just-said-yes-in-nikora-v-kruger?postId=151fc7af-4ab2-4115-8f2f-4c01ec15ed01&utm_campaign=d1f27818-1baa-4e0d-bf46-f8ac1994c093&utm_source=so&utm_medium=mail&utm_content=761384ff-2887-4761-b726-6a053b84fe64&cid=fcd0df4b-5de5-4aa8-b04d-2e46f8bd660b
It seems the court has taken a very large step beyond precedent and is tinkering with laws. Judicial overreach? I think so.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 499 |
| Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
| Uptime: | 49:37:21 |
| Calls: | 9,837 |
| Calls today: | 7 |
| Files: | 13,764 |
| Messages: | 6,194,128 |