https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/04/fluoride-explainer-what-is-us-election-donald-trump-robert-f-kennedy-jr
Good science is apolitical, but it is concerning that so many from the >extreme right seem to forget elementary scientific principles and
basic knowledge and crawl into delusionary holes.
I suspect it is first of all an attempt to capture support from those
who do not have the intellect to see through the effect of some
far-right policies, such as increased inequality and poverty - or
looked at from another perspective rewards to wealthy supporters, and >possibly a distraction from such things.
We have enough of such idiocy here, supported at times by the likes of
the NZ Taxpayer Union and their fringe protest groups, who pretend
that identifying such beliefs as wanting to remove fluoride from
drinking water is an attack on free speech . . .
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 07:40:04 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/04/fluoride-explainer-what-is-us-election-donald-trump-robert-f-kennedy-jrThe references are indeed from the USA, but of course our furthest
American right wing politicians have no equivalents here. So this is not about
Good science is apolitical, but it is concerning that so many from the >>>extreme right seem to forget elementary scientific principles and
basic knowledge and crawl into delusionary holes.
New Zealand.
right party (and currently the most influential in our government) is
the ACT Party; but I accept that Trump in is probably generally
regarded as more delusionary than David Seymour
Even after only one year, our ACT/NZ1/National government has managedI suspect it is first of all an attempt to capture support from thoseAgain, an American reference, invalid here.
who do not have the intellect to see through the effect of some
far-right policies, such as increased inequality and poverty - or
looked at from another perspective rewards to wealthy supporters, and >>>possibly a distraction from such things.
to increase inequality; provided conspicuous rewards to wealthy
supporters - and promised more to come. There is a direct comparison
with New Zealand.
I suspect your unsupported opinions are not even shared by manyAbsolute nonsense. They are not fringe, they are mainstream, but to you they >>are a fundamental threat to all you believe in - often the case with extreme >>left wing folk. So you keep lying about them.
We have enough of such idiocy here, supported at times by the likes of >>>the NZ Taxpayer Union and their fringe protest groups, who pretend
that identifying such beliefs as wanting to remove fluoride from
drinking water is an attack on free speech . . .
National Party or NZ First supporters
Good science is apolitical, but it is concerning that so many from the >extreme right seem to forget elementary scientific principles andAmerican right wing politicians have no equivalents here. So this is not about New Zealand.
basic knowledge and crawl into delusionary holes.
I suspect it is first of all an attempt to capture support from thoseAgain, an American reference, invalid here.
who do not have the intellect to see through the effect of some
far-right policies, such as increased inequality and poverty - or
looked at from another perspective rewards to wealthy supporters, and >possibly a distraction from such things.
We have enough of such idiocy here, supported at times by the likes ofAbsolute nonsense. They are not fringe, they are mainstream, but to you they are a fundamental threat to all you believe in - often the case with extreme left wing folk. So you keep lying about them.
the NZ Taxpayer Union and their fringe protest groups, who pretend
that identifying such beliefs as wanting to remove fluoride from
drinking water is an attack on free speech . . .
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/04/fluoride-explainer-what-is-us-election-donald-trump-robert-f-kennedy-jrThe references are indeed from the USA, but of course our furthest
American right wing politicians have no equivalents here. So this is not about >New Zealand.
Good science is apolitical, but it is concerning that so many from the >>extreme right seem to forget elementary scientific principles and
basic knowledge and crawl into delusionary holes.
Even after only one year, our ACT/NZ1/National government has managedI suspect it is first of all an attempt to capture support from thoseAgain, an American reference, invalid here.
who do not have the intellect to see through the effect of some
far-right policies, such as increased inequality and poverty - or
looked at from another perspective rewards to wealthy supporters, and >>possibly a distraction from such things.
I suspect your unsupported opinions are not even shared by manyAbsolute nonsense. They are not fringe, they are mainstream, but to you they >are a fundamental threat to all you believe in - often the case with extreme >left wing folk. So you keep lying about them.
We have enough of such idiocy here, supported at times by the likes of
the NZ Taxpayer Union and their fringe protest groups, who pretend
that identifying such beliefs as wanting to remove fluoride from
drinking water is an attack on free speech . . .
Good science is apolitical, but it is concerning that so many from the >extreme right seem to forget elementary scientific principles and
basic knowledge and crawl into delusionary holes.
On Tue, 05 Nov 2024, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
Good science is apolitical, but it is concerning that so many from the >>extreme right seem to forget elementary scientific principles and
basic knowledge and crawl into delusionary holes.
You are a total nutcase. The best science is from engineers and
experimental physicists, and they are not left-wing loops like you.
And fluoride is a toxin which doesn't belong in drinking water.
Idiots in the UK actually want to add *statins* to the drinking water
as well. Once you take the lid off, there will be no end to it all.
The only pragmatic healthy course is to prohibit *all* additives to
drinking water.
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 07:40:04 -0000 (UTC), TonyMore sarcasm and lies. ACT is right of centre not far right and clearly left of the US democrats.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/04/fluoride-explainer-what-is-us-election-donald-trump-robert-f-kennedy-jrThe references are indeed from the USA, but of course our furthest
American right wing politicians have no equivalents here. So this is not >>about
Good science is apolitical, but it is concerning that so many from the >>>extreme right seem to forget elementary scientific principles and
basic knowledge and crawl into delusionary holes.
New Zealand.
right party (and currently the most influential in our government) is
the ACT Party; but I accept that Trump in is probably generally
regarded as more delusionary than David Seymour
Nonsense. No comparison direct or imaginary.Even after only one year, our ACT/NZ1/National government has managedI suspect it is first of all an attempt to capture support from thoseAgain, an American reference, invalid here.
who do not have the intellect to see through the effect of some
far-right policies, such as increased inequality and poverty - or
looked at from another perspective rewards to wealthy supporters, and >>>possibly a distraction from such things.
to increase inequality; provided conspicuous rewards to wealthy
supporters - and promised more to come. There is a direct comparison
with New Zealand.
My unsupported opinions are as valid as yours, in this case moreso.I suspect your unsupported opinions are not even shared by manyAbsolute nonsense. They are not fringe, they are mainstream, but to you they >>are a fundamental threat to all you believe in - often the case with extreme >>left wing folk. So you keep lying about them.
We have enough of such idiocy here, supported at times by the likes of >>>the NZ Taxpayer Union and their fringe protest groups, who pretend
that identifying such beliefs as wanting to remove fluoride from
drinking water is an attack on free speech . . .
National Party or NZ First supporters
On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 08:00:42 GMT, wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote:Since you have no scientific training, your opinion is a waste of bandwidth.
On Tue, 05 Nov 2024, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
Good science is apolitical, but it is concerning that so many from the >>>extreme right seem to forget elementary scientific principles and
basic knowledge and crawl into delusionary holes.
You are a total nutcase. The best science is from engineers and >>experimental physicists, and they are not left-wing loops like you.
And fluoride is a toxin which doesn't belong in drinking water.
Idiots in the UK actually want to add *statins* to the drinking water
as well. Once you take the lid off, there will be no end to it all.
The only pragmatic healthy course is to prohibit *all* additives to >>drinking water.
I note you carefully deleted anything you had no real answer to - for >example: >https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/04/fluoride-explainer-what-is-us-election-donald-trump-robert-f-kennedy-jr
Thankfully we have had responsible governments in New Zealand that
have recognised the value of water treatment, including the addition
of fluoride . . . We do have problems with adequate dental care in
New Zealand, but there has been no suggestion that the current
government may change our very good policies regarding water
treatment.
On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 20:50:43 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 07:40:04 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/04/fluoride-explainer-what-is-us-election-donald-trump-robert-f-kennedy-jrThe references are indeed from the USA, but of course our furthest
American right wing politicians have no equivalents here. So this is not about
Good science is apolitical, but it is concerning that so many from the >>>>extreme right seem to forget elementary scientific principles and
basic knowledge and crawl into delusionary holes.
New Zealand.
right party (and currently the most influential in our government) is
the ACT Party; but I accept that Trump in is probably generally
regarded as more delusionary than David Seymour
There is no connection between any NZ politician and Trump. Rich it
is you who are deluded by your rhetoric.
Not even close. In its first year the current government has repealed
Even after only one year, our ACT/NZ1/National government has managedI suspect it is first of all an attempt to capture support from those >>>>who do not have the intellect to see through the effect of some >>>>far-right policies, such as increased inequality and poverty - or >>>>looked at from another perspective rewards to wealthy supporters, and >>>>possibly a distraction from such things.Again, an American reference, invalid here.
to increase inequality; provided conspicuous rewards to wealthy
supporters - and promised more to come. There is a direct comparison
with New Zealand.
more legislation than any previous new Government and remains popular.
I suspect your unsupported opinions are not even shared by manyAbsolute nonsense. They are not fringe, they are mainstream, but to you they >>>are a fundamental threat to all you believe in - often the case with extreme >>>left wing folk. So you keep lying about them.
We have enough of such idiocy here, supported at times by the likes of >>>>the NZ Taxpayer Union and their fringe protest groups, who pretend
that identifying such beliefs as wanting to remove fluoride from >>>>drinking water is an attack on free speech . . .
National Party or NZ First supporters
I suspect you always make have unwarranted suspicions on what Tony
says.
On Tue, 05 Nov 2024, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
Good science is apolitical, but it is concerning that so many from the >>extreme right seem to forget elementary scientific principles and
basic knowledge and crawl into delusionary holes.
You are a total nutcase. The best science is from engineers and
experimental physicists, and they are not left-wing loops like you.
And fluoride is a toxin which doesn't belong in drinking water.
Idiots in the UK actually want to add *statins* to the drinking water
as well. Once you take the lid off, there will be no end to it all.
The only pragmatic healthy course is to prohibit *all* additives to
drinking water.
On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 13:50:26 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/04/fluoride-explainer-what-is-us-election-donald-trump-robert-f-kennedy-jrWhy single out those on the right? There are all manor of non-right politicians who fail to accept any Science that goes against their
Good science is apolitical, but it is concerning that so many from the >>extreme right seem to forget elementary scientific principles and
basic knowledge and crawl into delusionary holes.
beliefs.
I suspect it is first of all an attempt to capture support from those
who do not have the intellect to see through the effect of some
far-right policies, such as increased inequality and poverty - or
looked at from another perspective rewards to wealthy supporters, and >>possibly a distraction from such things.
We have enough of such idiocy here, supported at times by the likes of
the NZ Taxpayer Union and their fringe protest groups, who pretend
that identifying such beliefs as wanting to remove fluoride from
drinking water is an attack on free speech . . .
Your usual anti-Government political rhetoric. Can you cite for any accusation in your last paragraph above? I don't recall any such
group being anti-fluoridation but I am happy to be proven wrong.
And fluoride is a toxin which doesn't belong in drinking water.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 07:36:40 |
| Calls: | 10,386 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 14,058 |
| Messages: | 6,416,644 |