https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/539111/new-shoplifting-allegation-against-former-green-mp-golriz-ghahraman
Golriz Ghahraman has done it again allegely. Shoplifting.
On 15 Jan 2025 23:21:13 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:I am inclined to agree, but I remind you of the occasions when you have defamed an MP. Maybe you should be more balanced.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/539111/new-shoplifting-allegation-against-former-green-mp-golriz-ghahraman
Golriz Ghahraman has done it again allegely. Shoplifting.
This is an appalling beat-up - this is an allegation, she has not been >arrested, and yet is featured as though she is again appearing in
court. With so many "businessmen" getting name suppression even after >conviction, this is very bad form from RNZ.
Of course the allegations may be true, but New Zealand used to expect
our news sources to presume innocence unless found guilty - this case
has not even got as far as a charge being made!
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Off topic, Tony. You really cannot help yourself from being
On 15 Jan 2025 23:21:13 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:I am inclined to agree, but I remind you of the occasions when you have defamed
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/539111/new-shoplifting-allegation-against-former-green-mp-golriz-ghahraman
Golriz Ghahraman has done it again allegely. Shoplifting.
This is an appalling beat-up - this is an allegation, she has not been >>arrested, and yet is featured as though she is again appearing in
court. With so many "businessmen" getting name suppression even after >>conviction, this is very bad form from RNZ.
Of course the allegations may be true, but New Zealand used to expect
our news sources to presume innocence unless found guilty - this case
has not even got as far as a charge being made!
an MP. Maybe you should be more balanced.
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 06:08:49 -0000 (UTC), TonyYou, my dear little child, are a liar. You have defamed many non-Labour, non-Green MPs over the years. Always non-left wing MPs (no surprise there of course). That is a fact.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Off topic, Tony. You really cannot help yourself from being
On 15 Jan 2025 23:21:13 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:I am inclined to agree, but I remind you of the occasions when you have >>defamed
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/539111/new-shoplifting-allegation-against-former-green-mp-golriz-ghahraman
Golriz Ghahraman has done it again allegely. Shoplifting.
This is an appalling beat-up - this is an allegation, she has not been >>>arrested, and yet is featured as though she is again appearing in
court. With so many "businessmen" getting name suppression even after >>>conviction, this is very bad form from RNZ.
Of course the allegations may be true, but New Zealand used to expect
our news sources to presume innocence unless found guilty - this case
has not even got as far as a charge being made!
an MP. Maybe you should be more balanced.
gratuitously nasty . . .
Golriz Ghahraman has done it again allegely. Shoplifting.
On 15 Jan 2025 23:21:13 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote: >>https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/539111/new-shoplifting-allegation-against-former-green-mp-golriz-ghahraman
Golriz Ghahraman has done it again allegely. Shoplifting.
Another thing that she "does again": she holidays over to Iran after
having originally come to NZ claiming to be a refugee from Iran !
Next time she goes over there, her NZ passport should be cancelled
whilst she is still there, buh-bye.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/506722/ghahraman-back-in-new-zealand-amid-shoplifting-claims
"Ghahraman had been away on a personal trip that had been planned
months ago when allegations surfaced last week that she had shoplifted
from Auckland clothing retailer Scotties Boutique before Christmas."
Media complicit in refusing to name Ghahraman's holiday venue, never
before seen the phrase "a personal trip" before or since. She
obviously went to Iran, and obviously the media think that we the
vulgar public don't need to know about that.
On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 20:11:57 GMT, wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote:The facts are clear, She is a thief. She has had her day in court.
On 15 Jan 2025 23:21:13 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote: >>>https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/539111/new-shoplifting-allegation-against-former-green-mp-golriz-ghahramanAnother good article here: >https://mountaintui.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-golriz-ghahraman
Golriz Ghahraman has done it again allegely. Shoplifting.
Another thing that she "does again": she holidays over to Iran after >>having originally come to NZ claiming to be a refugee from Iran !
Next time she goes over there, her NZ passport should be cancelled
whilst she is still there, buh-bye.
"Ghahraman had been away on a personal trip that had been plannedhttps://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/506722/ghahraman-back-in-new-zealand-amid-shoplifting-claims
months ago when allegations surfaced last week that she had shoplifted
from Auckland clothing retailer Scotties Boutique before Christmas."
Media complicit in refusing to name Ghahraman's holiday venue, never
before seen the phrase "a personal trip" before or since. She
obviously went to Iran, and obviously the media think that we the
vulgar public don't need to know about that.
On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 20:11:57 GMT, wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote:
On 15 Jan 2025 23:21:13 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote: >>>https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/539111/new-shoplifting-allegation-against-former-green-mp-golriz-ghahramanAnother good article here: >https://mountaintui.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-golriz-ghahraman
Golriz Ghahraman has done it again allegely. Shoplifting.
Another thing that she "does again": she holidays over to Iran after >>having originally come to NZ claiming to be a refugee from Iran !
Next time she goes over there, her NZ passport should be cancelled
whilst she is still there, buh-bye.
"Ghahraman had been away on a personal trip that had been plannedhttps://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/506722/ghahraman-back-in-new-zealand-amid-shoplifting-claims
months ago when allegations surfaced last week that she had shoplifted
from Auckland clothing retailer Scotties Boutique before Christmas."
Media complicit in refusing to name Ghahraman's holiday venue, never
before seen the phrase "a personal trip" before or since. She
obviously went to Iran, and obviously the media think that we the
vulgar public don't need to know about that.
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 10:54:11 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 22:11:07 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 20:11:57 GMT, wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote:
On 15 Jan 2025 23:21:13 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/539111/new-shoplifting-allegation-against-former-green-mp-golriz-ghahramanAnother good article here: >>>https://mountaintui.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-golriz-ghahraman
Golriz Ghahraman has done it again allegely. Shoplifting.
Another thing that she "does again": she holidays over to Iran after >>>>having originally come to NZ claiming to be a refugee from Iran !
Next time she goes over there, her NZ passport should be cancelled >>>>whilst she is still there, buh-bye.
"Ghahraman had been away on a personal trip that had been planned >>>>months ago when allegations surfaced last week that she had shoplifted >>>>from Auckland clothing retailer Scotties Boutique before Christmas."https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/506722/ghahraman-back-in-new-zealand-amid-shoplifting-claims
Media complicit in refusing to name Ghahraman's holiday venue, never >>>>before seen the phrase "a personal trip" before or since. She >>>>obviously went to Iran, and obviously the media think that we the >>>>vulgar public don't need to know about that.
Almost all of that is irrelevant and seeking only to mitigate
wrongdoing. She chose to enter politics and stay there for quite some >>time. Her life's choices have had consequences: we all face that.
Most of us though manage to avoid criminal conviction.
She pleaded guilty to the charges last year - it is the accusation
this year that is upsetting many people. Apparently she was pushing a
trolley with her own bag in it - and put an item in her bag as she was
moving around the store before gong to the checkout. That is exactly
what many shoppers do - sort items as they go around into different
places on the trolley. She had not finished shopping when the
allegation was made.
See: >https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/golriz-gharaman-and-the-150-pakn-save-shopping-incident-supermarket-never-complained-to-police-who-tried-to-use-allegation-in-court/M5S6ON6RYZERXI6TNSEJWEMVRA/
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 22:11:07 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 20:11:57 GMT, wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote:
On 15 Jan 2025 23:21:13 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote: >>>>https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/539111/new-shoplifting-allegation-against-former-green-mp-golriz-ghahramanAnother good article here: >>https://mountaintui.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-golriz-ghahraman
Golriz Ghahraman has done it again allegely. Shoplifting.
Another thing that she "does again": she holidays over to Iran after >>>having originally come to NZ claiming to be a refugee from Iran !
Next time she goes over there, her NZ passport should be cancelled
whilst she is still there, buh-bye.
"Ghahraman had been away on a personal trip that had been plannedhttps://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/506722/ghahraman-back-in-new-zealand-amid-shoplifting-claims
months ago when allegations surfaced last week that she had shoplifted >>>from Auckland clothing retailer Scotties Boutique before Christmas."
Media complicit in refusing to name Ghahraman's holiday venue, never >>>before seen the phrase "a personal trip" before or since. She
obviously went to Iran, and obviously the media think that we the
vulgar public don't need to know about that.
Almost all of that is irrelevant and seeking only to mitigate
wrongdoing. She chose to enter politics and stay there for quite some
time. Her life's choices have had consequences: we all face that.
Most of us though manage to avoid criminal conviction.
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 19:29:17 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>She is a admitted thief. She has no reason to complain about the current situation. If she really used her shopping bag inside her trolley for goods then as well as a thief she is an idiot. I don't know anybody stupid enough to do that uinless they are also a thief.
wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 10:54:11 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 22:11:07 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 20:11:57 GMT, wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote:
On 15 Jan 2025 23:21:13 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/539111/new-shoplifting-allegation-against-former-green-mp-golriz-ghahramanAnother good article here: >>>>https://mountaintui.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-golriz-ghahraman
Golriz Ghahraman has done it again allegely. Shoplifting.
Another thing that she "does again": she holidays over to Iran after >>>>>having originally come to NZ claiming to be a refugee from Iran ! >>>>>Next time she goes over there, her NZ passport should be cancelled >>>>>whilst she is still there, buh-bye.
"Ghahraman had been away on a personal trip that had been planned >>>>>months ago when allegations surfaced last week that she had shoplifted >>>>>from Auckland clothing retailer Scotties Boutique before Christmas."https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/506722/ghahraman-back-in-new-zealand-amid-shoplifting-claims
Media complicit in refusing to name Ghahraman's holiday venue, never >>>>>before seen the phrase "a personal trip" before or since. She >>>>>obviously went to Iran, and obviously the media think that we the >>>>>vulgar public don't need to know about that.
Almost all of that is irrelevant and seeking only to mitigate
wrongdoing. She chose to enter politics and stay there for quite some >>>time. Her life's choices have had consequences: we all face that.
Most of us though manage to avoid criminal conviction.
She pleaded guilty to the charges last year - it is the accusation
this year that is upsetting many people. Apparently she was pushing a >>trolley with her own bag in it - and put an item in her bag as she was >>moving around the store before gong to the checkout. That is exactly
what many shoppers do - sort items as they go around into different
places on the trolley. She had not finished shopping when the
allegation was made.
See: >>https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/golriz-gharaman-and-the-150-pakn-save-shopping-incident-supermarket-never-complained-to-police-who-tried-to-use-allegation-in-court/M5S6ON6RYZERXI6TNSEJWEMVRA/
And now one of our Corporates shows that they are ready to pile in to
the attack on a past Green MP - under the pretence of "irreverence"
and "a bit of a laugh" - shades of the "Dirty Tricks" of the past.
This sort of scurrilous publicity is just what the Atlas Network are
trying to get seen as a human right so they can use it more . . .
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 08:14:42 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Then you either never go to a supermarket or are willfully hiding the
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 19:29:17 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:She is a admitted thief. She has no reason to complain about the current >>situation. If she really used her shopping bag inside her trolley for goods >>then as well as a thief she is an idiot. I don't know anybody stupid enough to
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 10:54:11 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>>wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 22:11:07 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>>wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 20:11:57 GMT, wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote: >>>>>>
On 15 Jan 2025 23:21:13 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>>https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/539111/new-shoplifting-allegation-against-former-green-mp-golriz-ghahramanAnother good article here: >>>>>>https://mountaintui.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-golriz-ghahraman
Golriz Ghahraman has done it again allegely. Shoplifting.
Another thing that she "does again": she holidays over to Iran after >>>>>>>having originally come to NZ claiming to be a refugee from Iran ! >>>>>>>Next time she goes over there, her NZ passport should be cancelled >>>>>>>whilst she is still there, buh-bye.
"Ghahraman had been away on a personal trip that had been planned >>>>>>>months ago when allegations surfaced last week that she had shoplifted >>>>>>>from Auckland clothing retailer Scotties Boutique before Christmas." >>>>>>>https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/506722/ghahraman-back-in-new-zealand-amid-shoplifting-claims
Media complicit in refusing to name Ghahraman's holiday venue, never >>>>>>>before seen the phrase "a personal trip" before or since. She >>>>>>>obviously went to Iran, and obviously the media think that we the >>>>>>>vulgar public don't need to know about that.
Almost all of that is irrelevant and seeking only to mitigate >>>>>wrongdoing. She chose to enter politics and stay there for quite some >>>>>time. Her life's choices have had consequences: we all face that. >>>>>Most of us though manage to avoid criminal conviction.
She pleaded guilty to the charges last year - it is the accusation
this year that is upsetting many people. Apparently she was pushing a >>>>trolley with her own bag in it - and put an item in her bag as she was >>>>moving around the store before gong to the checkout. That is exactly >>>>what many shoppers do - sort items as they go around into different >>>>places on the trolley. She had not finished shopping when the >>>>allegation was made.
See: >>>>https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/golriz-gharaman-and-the-150-pakn-save-shopping-incident-supermarket-never-complained-to-police-who-tried-to-use-allegation-in-court/M5S6ON6RYZERXI6TNSEJWEMVRA/
And now one of our Corporates shows that they are ready to pile in to
the attack on a past Green MP - under the pretence of "irreverence"
and "a bit of a laugh" - shades of the "Dirty Tricks" of the past.
This sort of scurrilous publicity is just what the Atlas Network are >>>trying to get seen as a human right so they can use it more . . .
do that uinless they are also a thief.
truth from yourself. A lot of people use bags to separate items in
their trolley - to keep frozen from other items, to keep orders for
different people separate, to keep heavy items from squashing others,
or just to keep items from rolling in the trolley. You are an idiot,
and you are condoning poor journalism that has not had elementary fact >checking. But then you don't care about justice, do you tony.
You are trying to defend a non-event. She will be processed as required, let it
happen and keep you nasty little nose out of it.
So just what "processing" do you expect when there was no complaint,
and no charge of wrongdoing.
Why was this even in our papers - it was
clearly a vicious slur on a politician that offended a year ago but
admitted it and paid the penalties.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Then you either never go to a supermarket or are willfully hiding the
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 19:29:17 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:She is a admitted thief. She has no reason to complain about the current >situation. If she really used her shopping bag inside her trolley for goods >then as well as a thief she is an idiot. I don't know anybody stupid enough to >do that uinless they are also a thief.
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 10:54:11 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 22:11:07 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 20:11:57 GMT, wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote:
On 15 Jan 2025 23:21:13 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/539111/new-shoplifting-allegation-against-former-green-mp-golriz-ghahramanAnother good article here: >>>>>https://mountaintui.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-golriz-ghahraman
Golriz Ghahraman has done it again allegely. Shoplifting.
Another thing that she "does again": she holidays over to Iran after >>>>>>having originally come to NZ claiming to be a refugee from Iran ! >>>>>>Next time she goes over there, her NZ passport should be cancelled >>>>>>whilst she is still there, buh-bye.
"Ghahraman had been away on a personal trip that had been planned >>>>>>months ago when allegations surfaced last week that she had shoplifted >>>>>>from Auckland clothing retailer Scotties Boutique before Christmas." >>>>>>https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/506722/ghahraman-back-in-new-zealand-amid-shoplifting-claims
Media complicit in refusing to name Ghahraman's holiday venue, never >>>>>>before seen the phrase "a personal trip" before or since. She >>>>>>obviously went to Iran, and obviously the media think that we the >>>>>>vulgar public don't need to know about that.
Almost all of that is irrelevant and seeking only to mitigate >>>>wrongdoing. She chose to enter politics and stay there for quite some >>>>time. Her life's choices have had consequences: we all face that.
Most of us though manage to avoid criminal conviction.
She pleaded guilty to the charges last year - it is the accusation
this year that is upsetting many people. Apparently she was pushing a >>>trolley with her own bag in it - and put an item in her bag as she was >>>moving around the store before gong to the checkout. That is exactly
what many shoppers do - sort items as they go around into different >>>places on the trolley. She had not finished shopping when the
allegation was made.
See: >>>https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/golriz-gharaman-and-the-150-pakn-save-shopping-incident-supermarket-never-complained-to-police-who-tried-to-use-allegation-in-court/M5S6ON6RYZERXI6TNSEJWEMVRA/
And now one of our Corporates shows that they are ready to pile in to
the attack on a past Green MP - under the pretence of "irreverence"
and "a bit of a laugh" - shades of the "Dirty Tricks" of the past.
This sort of scurrilous publicity is just what the Atlas Network are
trying to get seen as a human right so they can use it more . . .
You are trying to defend a non-event. She will be processed as required, let it
happen and keep you nasty little nose out of it.
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 08:14:42 -0000 (UTC), TonyYou are living in your fantasy world, I live in the real one. I have never seen that and I think you are making it up. If true it is a silly thing to do.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Then you either never go to a supermarket or are willfully hiding the
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 19:29:17 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:She is a admitted thief. She has no reason to complain about the current >>situation. If she really used her shopping bag inside her trolley for goods >>then as well as a thief she is an idiot. I don't know anybody stupid enough >>to
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 10:54:11 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>>wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 22:11:07 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>>wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 20:11:57 GMT, wn@nosuch.com (Willy Nilly) wrote: >>>>>>
On 15 Jan 2025 23:21:13 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote: >>>>>>>>https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/539111/new-shoplifting-allegation-against-former-green-mp-golriz-ghahramanAnother good article here: >>>>>>https://mountaintui.substack.com/p/in-defence-of-golriz-ghahraman
Golriz Ghahraman has done it again allegely. Shoplifting.
Another thing that she "does again": she holidays over to Iran after >>>>>>>having originally come to NZ claiming to be a refugee from Iran ! >>>>>>>Next time she goes over there, her NZ passport should be cancelled >>>>>>>whilst she is still there, buh-bye.
"Ghahraman had been away on a personal trip that had been planned >>>>>>>months ago when allegations surfaced last week that she had shoplifted >>>>>>>from Auckland clothing retailer Scotties Boutique before Christmas." >>>>>>>https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/506722/ghahraman-back-in-new-zealand-amid-shoplifting-claims
Media complicit in refusing to name Ghahraman's holiday venue, never >>>>>>>before seen the phrase "a personal trip" before or since. She >>>>>>>obviously went to Iran, and obviously the media think that we the >>>>>>>vulgar public don't need to know about that.
Almost all of that is irrelevant and seeking only to mitigate >>>>>wrongdoing. She chose to enter politics and stay there for quite some >>>>>time. Her life's choices have had consequences: we all face that. >>>>>Most of us though manage to avoid criminal conviction.
She pleaded guilty to the charges last year - it is the accusation
this year that is upsetting many people. Apparently she was pushing a >>>>trolley with her own bag in it - and put an item in her bag as she was >>>>moving around the store before gong to the checkout. That is exactly >>>>what many shoppers do - sort items as they go around into different >>>>places on the trolley. She had not finished shopping when the >>>>allegation was made.
See: >>>>https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/golriz-gharaman-and-the-150-pakn-save-shopping-incident-supermarket-never-complained-to-police-who-tried-to-use-allegation-in-court/M5S6ON6RYZERXI6TNSEJWEMVRA/
And now one of our Corporates shows that they are ready to pile in to
the attack on a past Green MP - under the pretence of "irreverence"
and "a bit of a laugh" - shades of the "Dirty Tricks" of the past.
This sort of scurrilous publicity is just what the Atlas Network are >>>trying to get seen as a human right so they can use it more . . .
do that uinless they are also a thief.
truth from yourself. A lot of people use bags to separate items in
their trolley - to keep frozen from other items, to keep orders for
different people separate, to keep heavy items from squashing others,
or just to keep items from rolling in the trolley.
There was a complaint. That is sufficient to make it to the news for a politician, and you know it.You are trying to defend a non-event. She will be processed as required, let >>it
happen and keep you nasty little nose out of it.
So just what "processing" do you expect when there was no complaint,
and no charge of wrongdoing.
Why was this even in our papers - it wasNo, wrong. Silly boy. There was a complaint. Complaints should and usually do follow a process - that is what is happening - very simple really.
clearly a vicious slur on a politician that offended a year ago but
admitted it and paid the penalties.
Allegedly she has offended again - that is what is being reported.
--
Crash McBash
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 07:47:59 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:
Allegedly she has offended again - that is what is being reported.
--
Crash McBash
Maybe she can't help it.
Bill.
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:17:29 -0000 (UTC), TonyA complaint was made that she stole. That is fact - why do you lie?
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:03:44 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:Oh you poor wee boy. There was a complaint laid, that is a fact and your >>lying,
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 07:47:59 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>>wrote:
Allegedly she has offended again - that is what is being reported.
--
Crash McBash
Maybe she can't help it.
Bill.
Evidently this thread is starting from scratch again - I presume you
are referring to the allegation about Tony and her anti-social
behaviour - we do not need to talk about that here - she can't help >>>having a low IQ and pretending to be male; I agree with you Bill that >>>Tony can't help it, but a total lack of evidence is apparently not
enough to quell speculation, and Crash is usually more accurate that
in his quote above.
abuse and hatred of women and homophobia will not help you. Do you also hate >>jews and black people?
No complaint was laid. I have not made a complaint about your
incorrect, unsupported and unjustified assertions.
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:03:44 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:Oh you poor wee boy. There was a complaint laid, that is a fact and your lying, abuse and hatred of women and homophobia will not help you. Do you also hate jews and black people?
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 07:47:59 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>wrote:
Allegedly she has offended again - that is what is being reported.
--
Crash McBash
Maybe she can't help it.
Bill.
Evidently this thread is starting from scratch again - I presume you
are referring to the allegation about Tony and her anti-social
behaviour - we do not need to talk about that here - she can't help
having a low IQ and pretending to be male; I agree with you Bill that
Tony can't help it, but a total lack of evidence is apparently not
enough to quell speculation, and Crash is usually more accurate that
in his quote above.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:03:44 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:Oh you poor wee boy. There was a complaint laid, that is a fact and your lying,
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 07:47:59 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>wrote:
Allegedly she has offended again - that is what is being reported.
--
Crash McBash
Maybe she can't help it.
Bill.
Evidently this thread is starting from scratch again - I presume you
are referring to the allegation about Tony and her anti-social
behaviour - we do not need to talk about that here - she can't help
having a low IQ and pretending to be male; I agree with you Bill that
Tony can't help it, but a total lack of evidence is apparently not
enough to quell speculation, and Crash is usually more accurate that
in his quote above.
abuse and hatred of women and homophobia will not help you. Do you also hate >jews and black people?
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:39:52 -0000 (UTC), TonyAbuse gone
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:"She" is the cat's mother. If you are talking about Golriz Ghahraman...
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:17:29 -0000 (UTC), TonyA complaint was made that she stole. That is fact - why do you lie?
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:03:44 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:Oh you poor wee boy. There was a complaint laid, that is a fact and your >>>>lying,
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 07:47:59 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>>>>wrote:
Allegedly she has offended again - that is what is being reported. >>>>>>>
--
Crash McBash
Maybe she can't help it.
Bill.
Evidently this thread is starting from scratch again - I presume you >>>>>are referring to the allegation about Tony and her anti-social >>>>>behaviour - we do not need to talk about that here - she can't help >>>>>having a low IQ and pretending to be male; I agree with you Bill that >>>>>Tony can't help it, but a total lack of evidence is apparently not >>>>>enough to quell speculation, and Crash is usually more accurate that >>>>>in his quote above.
abuse and hatred of women and homophobia will not help you. Do you also >>>>hate
jews and black people?
No complaint was laid. I have not made a complaint about your
incorrect, unsupported and unjustified assertions.
In fact why do you breathe, after all your life is and always has been >>pointless.
You are irrelevant.
Golriz Gharaman was found guilty of shoplifting a year ago, and hasThat is a lie - read the OP. There was a complaint. You are irrelevant and extremely rude. Now, piss off little boy.
been punished for that. There has been no complaint recently,
justabuse gone.
disgraceful slurs and suggestions from nasty and ignorant people who
are politically motivated. If you believe there was a complaint then
prove it . . . .
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:"She" is the cat's mother. If you are talking about Golriz Ghahraman
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:17:29 -0000 (UTC), TonyA complaint was made that she stole. That is fact - why do you lie?
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:03:44 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:Oh you poor wee boy. There was a complaint laid, that is a fact and your >>>lying,
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 07:47:59 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>>>wrote:
Allegedly she has offended again - that is what is being reported.
--
Crash McBash
Maybe she can't help it.
Bill.
Evidently this thread is starting from scratch again - I presume you >>>>are referring to the allegation about Tony and her anti-social >>>>behaviour - we do not need to talk about that here - she can't help >>>>having a low IQ and pretending to be male; I agree with you Bill that >>>>Tony can't help it, but a total lack of evidence is apparently not >>>>enough to quell speculation, and Crash is usually more accurate that
in his quote above.
abuse and hatred of women and homophobia will not help you. Do you also hate >>>jews and black people?
No complaint was laid. I have not made a complaint about your
incorrect, unsupported and unjustified assertions.
In fact why do you breathe, after all your life is and always has been >pointless.
You are irrelevant.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Yet again you make an unsupported assertion - without quoting any
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:01:30 -0000 (UTC), TonyAh, you have changed your position. It matters not whether the police were >involved. A complaintb was, in fact, made. Read the article - sheesh, you are >thick!
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No complaint was made to the police
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:39:52 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:17:29 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:03:44 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:Oh you poor wee boy. There was a complaint laid, that is a fact and your >>>>>>>lying,
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 07:47:59 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>>>>>>>wrote:
Allegedly she has offended again - that is what is being reported. >>>>>>>>>>
--
Crash McBash
Maybe she can't help it.
Bill.
Evidently this thread is starting from scratch again - I presume you >>>>>>>>are referring to the allegation about Tony and her anti-social >>>>>>>>behaviour - we do not need to talk about that here - she can't help >>>>>>>>having a low IQ and pretending to be male; I agree with you Bill that >>>>>>>>Tony can't help it, but a total lack of evidence is apparently not >>>>>>>>enough to quell speculation, and Crash is usually more accurate that >>>>>>>>in his quote above.
abuse and hatred of women and homophobia will not help you. Do you also >>>>>>>hate
jews and black people?
So now you admit that there were no charges, but regard that as- there were no charges, and thereIrrelevant see above.
will be no charges.
Abuse gone.There Tony goes again - deleting truth that he does not like - a
There you go again Tony, hiding from the truth, even when you are not
Your mother has little to do with this although I imagine she is mightily >>>ashamed of you."She" is the cat's mother. If you are talking about Golriz Ghahraman... >>>Abuse goneA complaint was made that she stole. That is fact - why do you lie? >>>>>In fact why do you breathe, after all your life is and always has been >>>>>pointless.
No complaint was laid. I have not made a complaint about your >>>>>>incorrect, unsupported and unjustified assertions.
You are irrelevant.
Don't be silly. You know who I was referring to, in fact you worked it out >>>all
by yourself -well done little boy.
That is a lie - read the OP. There was a complaint. You are irrelevant and >>>extremely rude. Now, piss off little boy.
Golriz Gharaman was found guilty of shoplifting a year ago, and has >>>>been punished for that. There has been no complaint recently,
justabuse gone.
disgraceful slurs and suggestions from nasty and ignorant people who >>>>are politically motivated. If you believe there was a complaint then >>>>prove it . . . .
off topic gone.
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:19:57 -0000 (UTC), TonyYou are lyiing. Read the OP, it is there. Get some help, cl;eary you need it.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Yet again you make an unsupported assertion - without quoting any
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:01:30 -0000 (UTC), TonyAh, you have changed your position. It matters not whether the police were >>involved. A complaintb was, in fact, made. Read the article - sheesh, you are >>thick!
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No complaint was made to the police
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:39:52 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:17:29 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:03:44 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote: >>>>>>>>>Oh you poor wee boy. There was a complaint laid, that is a fact and >>>>>>>>your
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 07:47:59 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>>>>>>>>wrote:
Allegedly she has offended again - that is what is being reported. >>>>>>>>>>>
--
Crash McBash
Maybe she can't help it.
Bill.
Evidently this thread is starting from scratch again - I presume you >>>>>>>>>are referring to the allegation about Tony and her anti-social >>>>>>>>>behaviour - we do not need to talk about that here - she can't help >>>>>>>>>having a low IQ and pretending to be male; I agree with you Bill that >>>>>>>>>Tony can't help it, but a total lack of evidence is apparently not >>>>>>>>>enough to quell speculation, and Crash is usually more accurate that >>>>>>>>>in his quote above.
lying,
abuse and hatred of women and homophobia will not help you. Do you also >>>>>>>>hate
jews and black people?
source for that claim. You are despicable, Tony.
You are a fool. That was you who wrote that, not me. Do get that help.So now you admit that there were no charges, but regard that as- there were no charges, and thereIrrelevant see above.
will be no charges.
irrelevant! You cannot even be consistent with your lies.
Abuse gone.Abuse gone.
Abuse gone.
Your mother has little to do with this although I imagine she is mightily >>>>ashamed of you."She" is the cat's mother. If you are talking about Golriz Ghahraman... >>>>Abuse goneA complaint was made that she stole. That is fact - why do you lie? >>>>>>In fact why do you breathe, after all your life is and always has been >>>>>>pointless.
No complaint was laid. I have not made a complaint about your >>>>>>>incorrect, unsupported and unjustified assertions.
You are irrelevant.
Don't be silly. You know who I was referring to, in fact you worked it out >>>>all
by yourself -well done little boy.
That is a lie - read the OP. There was a complaint. You are irrelevant and >>>>extremely rude. Now, piss off little boy.
Golriz Gharaman was found guilty of shoplifting a year ago, and has >>>>>been punished for that. There has been no complaint recently,
justabuse gone.
disgraceful slurs and suggestions from nasty and ignorant people who >>>>>are politically motivated. If you believe there was a complaint then >>>>>prove it . . . .
off topic gone.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No complaint was made to the police - there were no charges, and there
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:39:52 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:17:29 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:03:44 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:Oh you poor wee boy. There was a complaint laid, that is a fact and your >>>>>lying,
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 07:47:59 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>>>>>wrote:
Allegedly she has offended again - that is what is being reported. >>>>>>>>
--
Crash McBash
Maybe she can't help it.
Bill.
Evidently this thread is starting from scratch again - I presume you >>>>>>are referring to the allegation about Tony and her anti-social >>>>>>behaviour - we do not need to talk about that here - she can't help >>>>>>having a low IQ and pretending to be male; I agree with you Bill that >>>>>>Tony can't help it, but a total lack of evidence is apparently not >>>>>>enough to quell speculation, and Crash is usually more accurate that >>>>>>in his quote above.
abuse and hatred of women and homophobia will not help you. Do you also >>>>>hate
jews and black people?
Your mother has little to do with this although I imagine she is mightily >ashamed of you."She" is the cat's mother. If you are talking about Golriz Ghahraman... >Abuse goneA complaint was made that she stole. That is fact - why do you lie?
No complaint was laid. I have not made a complaint about your >>>>incorrect, unsupported and unjustified assertions.
In fact why do you breathe, after all your life is and always has been >>>pointless.
You are irrelevant.
Don't be silly. You know who I was referring to, in fact you worked it out all >by yourself -well done little boy.
That is a lie - read the OP. There was a complaint. You are irrelevant and >extremely rude. Now, piss off little boy.
Golriz Gharaman was found guilty of shoplifting a year ago, and has
been punished for that. There has been no complaint recently,
justabuse gone.
disgraceful slurs and suggestions from nasty and ignorant people who
are politically motivated. If you believe there was a complaint then
prove it . . . .
off topic gone.
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:01:30 -0000 (UTC), TonyAh, you have changed your position. It matters not whether the police were involved. A complaintb was, in fact, made. Read the article - sheesh, you are thick!
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No complaint was made to the police
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:39:52 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:17:29 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:03:44 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:Oh you poor wee boy. There was a complaint laid, that is a fact and your >>>>>>lying,
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 07:47:59 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>>>>>>wrote:
Allegedly she has offended again - that is what is being reported. >>>>>>>>>
--
Crash McBash
Maybe she can't help it.
Bill.
Evidently this thread is starting from scratch again - I presume you >>>>>>>are referring to the allegation about Tony and her anti-social >>>>>>>behaviour - we do not need to talk about that here - she can't help >>>>>>>having a low IQ and pretending to be male; I agree with you Bill that >>>>>>>Tony can't help it, but a total lack of evidence is apparently not >>>>>>>enough to quell speculation, and Crash is usually more accurate that >>>>>>>in his quote above.
abuse and hatred of women and homophobia will not help you. Do you also >>>>>>hate
jews and black people?
- there were no charges, and thereIrrelevant see above.
will be no charges.
Your mother has little to do with this although I imagine she is mightily >>ashamed of you."She" is the cat's mother. If you are talking about Golriz Ghahraman... >>Abuse goneA complaint was made that she stole. That is fact - why do you lie?
No complaint was laid. I have not made a complaint about your >>>>>incorrect, unsupported and unjustified assertions.
In fact why do you breathe, after all your life is and always has been >>>>pointless.
You are irrelevant.
Don't be silly. You know who I was referring to, in fact you worked it out >>all
by yourself -well done little boy.
That is a lie - read the OP. There was a complaint. You are irrelevant and >>extremely rude. Now, piss off little boy.
Golriz Gharaman was found guilty of shoplifting a year ago, and has
been punished for that. There has been no complaint recently,
justabuse gone.
disgraceful slurs and suggestions from nasty and ignorant people who
are politically motivated. If you believe there was a complaint then >>>prove it . . . .
off topic gone.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:19:57 -0000 (UTC), TonyYou are lyiing. Read the OP, it is there. Get some help, cl;eary you need it. >>
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Yet again you make an unsupported assertion - without quoting any
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:01:30 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Ah, you have changed your position. It matters not whether the police were >>>involved. A complaintb was, in fact, made. Read the article - sheesh, you are
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No complaint was made to the police
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:39:52 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:17:29 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:03:44 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>Oh you poor wee boy. There was a complaint laid, that is a fact and >>>>>>>>>your
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 07:47:59 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:
Allegedly she has offended again - that is what is being reported. >>>>>>>>>>>>
--
Crash McBash
Maybe she can't help it.
Bill.
Evidently this thread is starting from scratch again - I presume you >>>>>>>>>>are referring to the allegation about Tony and her anti-social >>>>>>>>>>behaviour - we do not need to talk about that here - she can't help >>>>>>>>>>having a low IQ and pretending to be male; I agree with you Bill that >>>>>>>>>>Tony can't help it, but a total lack of evidence is apparently not >>>>>>>>>>enough to quell speculation, and Crash is usually more accurate that >>>>>>>>>>in his quote above.
lying,
abuse and hatred of women and homophobia will not help you. Do you also
hate
jews and black people?
thick!
source for that claim. You are despicable, Tony.
You are a fool. That was you who wrote that, not me. Do get that help.
So now you admit that there were no charges, but regard that as- there were no charges, and thereIrrelevant see above.
will be no charges.
irrelevant! You cannot even be consistent with your lies.
Abuse gone.
Abuse gone.
Abuse gone.
Your mother has little to do with this although I imagine she is mightily >>>>>ashamed of you."She" is the cat's mother. If you are talking about Golriz Ghahraman... >>>>>Abuse goneA complaint was made that she stole. That is fact - why do you lie? >>>>>>>In fact why do you breathe, after all your life is and always has been >>>>>>>pointless.
No complaint was laid. I have not made a complaint about your >>>>>>>>incorrect, unsupported and unjustified assertions.
You are irrelevant.
Don't be silly. You know who I was referring to, in fact you worked it out >>>>>all
by yourself -well done little boy.
That is a lie - read the OP. There was a complaint. You are irrelevant and >>>>>extremely rude. Now, piss off little boy.
Golriz Gharaman was found guilty of shoplifting a year ago, and has >>>>>>been punished for that. There has been no complaint recently,
justabuse gone.
disgraceful slurs and suggestions from nasty and ignorant people who >>>>>>are politically motivated. If you believe there was a complaint then >>>>>>prove it . . . .
off topic gone.
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:43:35 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:19:57 -0000 (UTC), TonyYou are lyiing. Read the OP, it is there. Get some help, cl;eary you need it. >>>
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Yet again you make an unsupported assertion - without quoting any
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:01:30 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Ah, you have changed your position. It matters not whether the police were >>>>involved. A complaintb was, in fact, made. Read the article - sheesh, you are
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No complaint was made to the police
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:39:52 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:17:29 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:03:44 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>Oh you poor wee boy. There was a complaint laid, that is a fact and >>>>>>>>>>your
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 07:47:59 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:
Allegedly she has offended again - that is what is being reported. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
--
Crash McBash
Maybe she can't help it.
Bill.
Evidently this thread is starting from scratch again - I presume you >>>>>>>>>>>are referring to the allegation about Tony and her anti-social >>>>>>>>>>>behaviour - we do not need to talk about that here - she can't help >>>>>>>>>>>having a low IQ and pretending to be male; I agree with you Bill that
Tony can't help it, but a total lack of evidence is apparently not >>>>>>>>>>>enough to quell speculation, and Crash is usually more accurate that >>>>>>>>>>>in his quote above.
lying,
abuse and hatred of women and homophobia will not help you. Do you also
hate
jews and black people?
thick!
source for that claim. You are despicable, Tony.
You are a fool. That was you who wrote that, not me. Do get that help.
So now you admit that there were no charges, but regard that as >>>irrelevant! You cannot even be consistent with your lies.- there were no charges, and thereIrrelevant see above.
will be no charges.
Abuse gone.
Abuse gone.
Abuse gone.
Your mother has little to do with this although I imagine she is mightily >>>>>>ashamed of you."She" is the cat's mother. If you are talking about Golriz Ghahraman... >>>>>>Abuse goneA complaint was made that she stole. That is fact - why do you lie? >>>>>>>>In fact why do you breathe, after all your life is and always has been >>>>>>>>pointless.
No complaint was laid. I have not made a complaint about your >>>>>>>>>incorrect, unsupported and unjustified assertions.
You are irrelevant.
Don't be silly. You know who I was referring to, in fact you worked it out
all
by yourself -well done little boy.
That is a lie - read the OP. There was a complaint. You are irrelevant and
Golriz Gharaman was found guilty of shoplifting a year ago, and has >>>>>>>been punished for that. There has been no complaint recently,
extremely rude. Now, piss off little boy.
justabuse gone.
disgraceful slurs and suggestions from nasty and ignorant people who >>>>>>>are politically motivated. If you believe there was a complaint then >>>>>>>prove it . . . .
off topic gone.
There has been no further charge against Gharaman, and will not be.
You have not been able to give any evidence to the contrary.
You have been, and are abusing yourself, Tony.
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:43:35 -0000 (UTC), TonyI did not at any time say there was.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:19:57 -0000 (UTC), TonyYou are lyiing. Read the OP, it is there. Get some help, cl;eary you need it. >>>
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Yet again you make an unsupported assertion - without quoting any
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:01:30 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Ah, you have changed your position. It matters not whether the police were >>>>involved. A complaintb was, in fact, made. Read the article - sheesh, you >>>>are
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No complaint was made to the police
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:39:52 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:17:29 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:03:44 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>Oh you poor wee boy. There was a complaint laid, that is a fact and >>>>>>>>>>your
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 07:47:59 +1300, Crash >>>>>>>>>>>><nogood@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:
Allegedly she has offended again - that is what is being reported. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
--
Crash McBash
Maybe she can't help it.
Bill.
Evidently this thread is starting from scratch again - I presume you >>>>>>>>>>>are referring to the allegation about Tony and her anti-social >>>>>>>>>>>behaviour - we do not need to talk about that here - she can't help >>>>>>>>>>>having a low IQ and pretending to be male; I agree with you Bill that
Tony can't help it, but a total lack of evidence is apparently not >>>>>>>>>>>enough to quell speculation, and Crash is usually more accurate that >>>>>>>>>>>in his quote above.
lying,
abuse and hatred of women and homophobia will not help you. Do you >>>>>>>>>>also
hate
jews and black people?
thick!
source for that claim. You are despicable, Tony.
You are a fool. That was you who wrote that, not me. Do get that help.
So now you admit that there were no charges, but regard that as >>>irrelevant! You cannot even be consistent with your lies.- there were no charges, and thereIrrelevant see above.
will be no charges.
Abuse gone.
Abuse gone.
Abuse gone.
Your mother has little to do with this although I imagine she is mightily >>>>>>ashamed of you."She" is the cat's mother. If you are talking about Golriz Ghahraman... >>>>>>Abuse goneA complaint was made that she stole. That is fact - why do you lie? >>>>>>>>In fact why do you breathe, after all your life is and always has been >>>>>>>>pointless.
No complaint was laid. I have not made a complaint about your >>>>>>>>>incorrect, unsupported and unjustified assertions.
You are irrelevant.
Don't be silly. You know who I was referring to, in fact you worked it >>>>>>out
all
by yourself -well done little boy.
That is a lie - read the OP. There was a complaint. You are irrelevant >>>>>>and
Golriz Gharaman was found guilty of shoplifting a year ago, and has >>>>>>>been punished for that. There has been no complaint recently,
extremely rude. Now, piss off little boy.
justabuse gone.
disgraceful slurs and suggestions from nasty and ignorant people who >>>>>>>are politically motivated. If you believe there was a complaint then >>>>>>>prove it . . . .
off topic gone.
There has been no further charge against Gharaman, and will not be.
You have not been able to give any evidence to the contrary.
You have been, and are abusing yourself, Tony.That is something that you do, no doubt daily. Getting old are you?
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 12:07:52 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:43:35 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:19:57 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:You are lyiing. Read the OP, it is there. Get some help, cl;eary you need it.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Yet again you make an unsupported assertion - without quoting any >>>>source for that claim. You are despicable, Tony.
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:01:30 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Ah, you have changed your position. It matters not whether the police were >>>>>involved. A complaintb was, in fact, made. Read the article - sheesh, you >>>>>are
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No complaint was made to the police
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:39:52 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:17:29 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:03:44 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>Oh you poor wee boy. There was a complaint laid, that is a fact and >>>>>>>>>>>your
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 07:47:59 +1300, Crash >>>>>>>>>>>>><nogood@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:
Allegedly she has offended again - that is what is being >>>>>>>>>>>>>>reported.
--
Crash McBash
Maybe she can't help it.
Bill.
Evidently this thread is starting from scratch again - I presume you
are referring to the allegation about Tony and her anti-social >>>>>>>>>>>>behaviour - we do not need to talk about that here - she can't help
having a low IQ and pretending to be male; I agree with you Bill >>>>>>>>>>>>that
Tony can't help it, but a total lack of evidence is apparently not >>>>>>>>>>>>enough to quell speculation, and Crash is usually more accurate that
in his quote above.
lying,
abuse and hatred of women and homophobia will not help you. Do you >>>>>>>>>>>also
hate
jews and black people?
thick!
You are a fool. That was you who wrote that, not me. Do get that help.
So now you admit that there were no charges, but regard that as >>>>irrelevant! You cannot even be consistent with your lies.- there were no charges, and thereIrrelevant see above.
will be no charges.
Abuse gone.
Abuse gone.
Abuse gone.
Your mother has little to do with this although I imagine she is >>>>>>>mightily"She" is the cat's mother. If you are talking about Golriz Ghahraman... >>>>>>>Abuse goneA complaint was made that she stole. That is fact - why do you lie? >>>>>>>>>In fact why do you breathe, after all your life is and always has been >>>>>>>>>pointless.
No complaint was laid. I have not made a complaint about your >>>>>>>>>>incorrect, unsupported and unjustified assertions.
You are irrelevant.
ashamed of you.
Don't be silly. You know who I was referring to, in fact you worked it >>>>>>>out
all
by yourself -well done little boy.
extremely rude. Now, piss off little boy.
Golriz Gharaman was found guilty of shoplifting a year ago, and has >>>>>>>>been punished for that. There has been no complaint recently, >>>>>>>That is a lie - read the OP. There was a complaint. You are irrelevant >>>>>>>and
justabuse gone.
disgraceful slurs and suggestions from nasty and ignorant people who >>>>>>>>are politically motivated. If you believe there was a complaint then >>>>>>>>prove it . . . .
off topic gone.
There has been no further charge against Gharaman, and will not be.
You have not been able to give any evidence to the contrary.
You have been, and are abusing yourself, Tony.
You may apologise now, Tony.Nothing to apologise for, everything I have written on the subject is accurate. But you should apologise for your lies and constant abuse but only a man would do that, not a wanker like you, you abusive childish cretin.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Is it instinct or training that has you acting out "Double down and
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 12:07:52 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:Abuse goneThe truth about this case is starting to come through - >>https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/privacy-commissioner-digs-into-golriz-ghahraman-shopping-incident/ATNGPRU6WFAADOR3GUA7HVKVE4/
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:43:35 -0000 (UTC), Tony
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:19:57 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:You are lyiing. Read the OP, it is there. Get some help, cl;eary you need it.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Yet again you make an unsupported assertion - without quoting any >>>>>source for that claim. You are despicable, Tony.
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:01:30 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Ah, you have changed your position. It matters not whether the police were
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No complaint was made to the police
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:39:52 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:17:29 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:03:44 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>Oh you poor wee boy. There was a complaint laid, that is a fact and >>>>>>>>>>>>your
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 07:47:59 +1300, Crash >>>>>>>>>>>>>><nogood@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:
Allegedly she has offended again - that is what is being >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>reported.
--
Crash McBash
Maybe she can't help it.
Bill.
Evidently this thread is starting from scratch again - I presume you
are referring to the allegation about Tony and her anti-social >>>>>>>>>>>>>behaviour - we do not need to talk about that here - she can't help
having a low IQ and pretending to be male; I agree with you Bill >>>>>>>>>>>>>that
Tony can't help it, but a total lack of evidence is apparently not >>>>>>>>>>>>>enough to quell speculation, and Crash is usually more accurate that
in his quote above.
lying,
abuse and hatred of women and homophobia will not help you. Do you >>>>>>>>>>>>also
hate
jews and black people?
involved. A complaintb was, in fact, made. Read the article - sheesh, you >>>>>>are
thick!
You are a fool. That was you who wrote that, not me. Do get that help. >>>>>
So now you admit that there were no charges, but regard that as >>>>>irrelevant! You cannot even be consistent with your lies.- there were no charges, and thereIrrelevant see above.
will be no charges.
Abuse gone.Abuse gone.
Abuse gone.
Abuse gone"She" is the cat's mother. If you are talking about Golriz Ghahraman...A complaint was made that she stole. That is fact - why do you lie? >>>>>>>>>>In fact why do you breathe, after all your life is and always has been
No complaint was laid. I have not made a complaint about your >>>>>>>>>>>incorrect, unsupported and unjustified assertions.
pointless.
You are irrelevant.
Your mother has little to do with this although I imagine she is >>>>>>>>mightily
ashamed of you.
Don't be silly. You know who I was referring to, in fact you worked it >>>>>>>>out
all
by yourself -well done little boy.
extremely rude. Now, piss off little boy.
Golriz Gharaman was found guilty of shoplifting a year ago, and has >>>>>>>>>been punished for that. There has been no complaint recently, >>>>>>>>That is a lie - read the OP. There was a complaint. You are irrelevant >>>>>>>>and
justabuse gone.
disgraceful slurs and suggestions from nasty and ignorant people who >>>>>>>>>are politically motivated. If you believe there was a complaint then >>>>>>>>>prove it . . . .
off topic gone.
There has been no further charge against Gharaman, and will not be.
You have not been able to give any evidence to the contrary.
You have been, and are abusing yourself, Tony.
Nothing to apologise for, everything I have written on the subject is accurate.
You may apologise now, Tony.
But you should apologise for your lies and constant abuse but only a man would >do that, not a wanker like you, you abusive childish cretin.
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:26:39 -0000 (UTC), TonyAbuse gone.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 12:07:52 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:Abuse goneThe truth about this case is starting to come through - >>>https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/privacy-commissioner-digs-into-golriz-ghahraman-shopping-incident/ATNGPRU6WFAADOR3GUA7HVKVE4/
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:43:35 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:19:57 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:You are lyiing. Read the OP, it is there. Get some help, cl;eary you need >>>>>it.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Yet again you make an unsupported assertion - without quoting any >>>>>>source for that claim. You are despicable, Tony.
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:01:30 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Ah, you have changed your position. It matters not whether the police >>>>>>>were
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No complaint was made to the police
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:39:52 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:17:29 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:03:44 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>Oh you poor wee boy. There was a complaint laid, that is a fact >>>>>>>>>>>>>and
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 07:47:59 +1300, Crash >>>>>>>>>>>>>>><nogood@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:
Allegedly she has offended again - that is what is being >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>reported.
--
Crash McBash
Maybe she can't help it.
Bill.
Evidently this thread is starting from scratch again - I presume >>>>>>>>>>>>>>you
are referring to the allegation about Tony and her anti-social >>>>>>>>>>>>>>behaviour - we do not need to talk about that here - she can't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>help
having a low IQ and pretending to be male; I agree with you Bill >>>>>>>>>>>>>>that
Tony can't help it, but a total lack of evidence is apparently not
enough to quell speculation, and Crash is usually more accurate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>that
in his quote above.
your
lying,
abuse and hatred of women and homophobia will not help you. Do you >>>>>>>>>>>>>also
hate
jews and black people?
involved. A complaintb was, in fact, made. Read the article - sheesh, >>>>>>>you
are
thick!
You are a fool. That was you who wrote that, not me. Do get that help. >>>>>>
So now you admit that there were no charges, but regard that as >>>>>>irrelevant! You cannot even be consistent with your lies.- there were no charges, and thereIrrelevant see above.
will be no charges.
Abuse gone.Abuse gone.
Abuse gone.
Abuse gone"She" is the cat's mother. If you are talking about Golriz >>>>>>>>>>Ghahraman...A complaint was made that she stole. That is fact - why do you lie? >>>>>>>>>>>In fact why do you breathe, after all your life is and always has >>>>>>>>>>>been
No complaint was laid. I have not made a complaint about your >>>>>>>>>>>>incorrect, unsupported and unjustified assertions.
pointless.
You are irrelevant.
Your mother has little to do with this although I imagine she is >>>>>>>>>mightily
ashamed of you.
Don't be silly. You know who I was referring to, in fact you worked it >>>>>>>>>out
all
by yourself -well done little boy.
extremely rude. Now, piss off little boy.
Golriz Gharaman was found guilty of shoplifting a year ago, and has >>>>>>>>>>been punished for that. There has been no complaint recently, >>>>>>>>>That is a lie - read the OP. There was a complaint. You are irrelevant >>>>>>>>>and
justabuse gone.
disgraceful slurs and suggestions from nasty and ignorant people who >>>>>>>>>>are politically motivated. If you believe there was a complaint then >>>>>>>>>>prove it . . . .
off topic gone.
There has been no further charge against Gharaman, and will not be.
You have not been able to give any evidence to the contrary.
You have been, and are abusing yourself, Tony.
Nothing to apologise for, everything I have written on the subject is >>accurate.
You may apologise now, Tony.
But you should apologise for your lies and constant abuse but only a man >>would
do that, not a wanker like you, you abusive childish cretin.
From the article:Irrelevant. There was a complaint. At no time did I say that the police had laid a complaint. You mentioned the police, not me.
"The Herald has since revealed Foodstuffs, which owns Pak’nSave, did
not directly complain to police but recorded the incident involving
goods worth less than $150 into the Auror retail crime platform along
with around 20,000 other incidents each year.
It was also revealed police tried to introduce the allegation into >Ghahraman’s High Court sentencing appeal over four shoplifting
convictions in the weeks after it happened."
You may not realise that the supermarket does not control the system;
the police are now being investigated for breaking privacy rules to
have accessed the footage before the court case - see: >https://norightturn.blogspot.com/2025/01/how-is-this-legal.html
So much for your allegation of a complaint . . .
The Herald has since revealed Foodstuffs, which owns Pak’nSave, did
not directly complain to police but recorded the incident involving
goods worth less than $150 into the Auror retail crime platform along
with around 20,000 other incidents each year.
It was also revealed police tried to introduce the allegation into >Ghahraman’s High Court sentencing appeal over four shoplifting
convictions in the weeks after it happened.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:You have not shown that there was a complaint. The Supermarket denied
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:26:39 -0000 (UTC), TonyAbuse gone.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 12:07:52 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:Abuse goneThe truth about this case is starting to come through - >>>>https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/privacy-commissioner-digs-into-golriz-ghahraman-shopping-incident/ATNGPRU6WFAADOR3GUA7HVKVE4/
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:43:35 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:19:57 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:You are lyiing. Read the OP, it is there. Get some help, cl;eary you need >>>>>>it.
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Yet again you make an unsupported assertion - without quoting any >>>>>>>source for that claim. You are despicable, Tony.
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:01:30 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Ah, you have changed your position. It matters not whether the police >>>>>>>>were
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No complaint was made to the police
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:39:52 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:17:29 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:03:44 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Oh you poor wee boy. There was a complaint laid, that is a fact >>>>>>>>>>>>>>and
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 07:47:59 +1300, Crash >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><nogood@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:
Allegedly she has offended again - that is what is being >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>reported.
--
Crash McBash
Maybe she can't help it.
Bill.
Evidently this thread is starting from scratch again - I presume >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>you
are referring to the allegation about Tony and her anti-social >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>behaviour - we do not need to talk about that here - she can't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>help
having a low IQ and pretending to be male; I agree with you Bill >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>that
Tony can't help it, but a total lack of evidence is apparently not
enough to quell speculation, and Crash is usually more accurate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>that
in his quote above.
your
lying,
abuse and hatred of women and homophobia will not help you. Do you
also
hate
jews and black people?
involved. A complaintb was, in fact, made. Read the article - sheesh, >>>>>>>>you
are
thick!
You are a fool. That was you who wrote that, not me. Do get that help. >>>>>>>
So now you admit that there were no charges, but regard that as >>>>>>>irrelevant! You cannot even be consistent with your lies.- there were no charges, and thereIrrelevant see above.
will be no charges.
Abuse gone.Abuse gone.
Abuse gone.
Abuse gone"She" is the cat's mother. If you are talking about Golriz >>>>>>>>>>>Ghahraman...A complaint was made that she stole. That is fact - why do you lie? >>>>>>>>>>>>In fact why do you breathe, after all your life is and always has >>>>>>>>>>>>been
No complaint was laid. I have not made a complaint about your >>>>>>>>>>>>>incorrect, unsupported and unjustified assertions.
pointless.
You are irrelevant.
Your mother has little to do with this although I imagine she is >>>>>>>>>>mightily
ashamed of you.
Don't be silly. You know who I was referring to, in fact you worked it
out
all
by yourself -well done little boy.
and
Golriz Gharaman was found guilty of shoplifting a year ago, and has >>>>>>>>>>>been punished for that. There has been no complaint recently, >>>>>>>>>>That is a lie - read the OP. There was a complaint. You are irrelevant
extremely rude. Now, piss off little boy.
justabuse gone.
disgraceful slurs and suggestions from nasty and ignorant people who >>>>>>>>>>>are politically motivated. If you believe there was a complaint then
prove it . . . .
off topic gone.
There has been no further charge against Gharaman, and will not be. >>>>>You have not been able to give any evidence to the contrary.
You have been, and are abusing yourself, Tony.
Nothing to apologise for, everything I have written on the subject is >>>accurate.
You may apologise now, Tony.
But you should apologise for your lies and constant abuse but only a man >>>would
do that, not a wanker like you, you abusive childish cretin.
Irrelevant. There was a complaint. At no time did I say that the police had >laid a complaint. You mentioned the police, not me.
From the article:
"The Herald has since revealed Foodstuffs, which owns Pak’nSave, did
not directly complain to police but recorded the incident involving
goods worth less than $150 into the Auror retail crime platform along
with around 20,000 other incidents each year.
It was also revealed police tried to introduce the allegation into >>Ghahraman’s High Court sentencing appeal over four shoplifting
convictions in the weeks after it happened."
You may not realise that the supermarket does not control the system;
the police are now being investigated for breaking privacy rules to
have accessed the footage before the court case - see: >>https://norightturn.blogspot.com/2025/01/how-is-this-legal.html
So much for your allegation of a complaint . . .
The Herald has since revealed Foodstuffs, which owns Pak’nSave, did
not directly complain to police but recorded the incident involving
goods worth less than $150 into the Auror retail crime platform along
with around 20,000 other incidents each year.
It was also revealed police tried to introduce the allegation into >>Ghahraman’s High Court sentencing appeal over four shoplifting
convictions in the weeks after it happened.
You may apologise and piss off.
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 06:13:17 -0000 (UTC), TonyAbuse gone
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:You have not shown that there was a complaint. The Supermarket denied
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 00:26:39 -0000 (UTC), TonyAbuse gone.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 12:07:52 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>>wrote:Abuse goneThe truth about this case is starting to come through - >>>>>https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/privacy-commissioner-digs-into-golriz-ghahraman-shopping-incident/ATNGPRU6WFAADOR3GUA7HVKVE4/
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:43:35 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:19:57 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:You are lyiing. Read the OP, it is there. Get some help, cl;eary you >>>>>>>need
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Yet again you make an unsupported assertion - without quoting any >>>>>>>>source for that claim. You are despicable, Tony.
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 20:01:30 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:Ah, you have changed your position. It matters not whether the police >>>>>>>>>were
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:No complaint was made to the police
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:39:52 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:17:29 -0000 (UTC), Tony >>>>>>>>>>>>>><lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:03:44 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Oh you poor wee boy. There was a complaint laid, that is a fact >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>and
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025 07:47:59 +1300, Crash >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><nogood@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:
Allegedly she has offended again - that is what is being >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>reported.
--
Crash McBash
Maybe she can't help it.
Bill.
Evidently this thread is starting from scratch again - I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>presume
you
are referring to the allegation about Tony and her anti-social >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>behaviour - we do not need to talk about that here - she can't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>help
having a low IQ and pretending to be male; I agree with you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Bill
that
Tony can't help it, but a total lack of evidence is apparently >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>not
enough to quell speculation, and Crash is usually more accurate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>that
in his quote above.
your
lying,
abuse and hatred of women and homophobia will not help you. Do >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>you
also
hate
jews and black people?
involved. A complaintb was, in fact, made. Read the article - sheesh, >>>>>>>>>you
are
thick!
it.
You are a fool. That was you who wrote that, not me. Do get that help. >>>>>>>>
So now you admit that there were no charges, but regard that as >>>>>>>>irrelevant! You cannot even be consistent with your lies.- there were no charges, and thereIrrelevant see above.
will be no charges.
Abuse gone.Abuse gone.
Abuse gone.
Abuse gone"She" is the cat's mother. If you are talking about Golriz >>>>>>>>>>>>Ghahraman...A complaint was made that she stole. That is fact - why do you lie?
No complaint was laid. I have not made a complaint about your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>incorrect, unsupported and unjustified assertions.
In fact why do you breathe, after all your life is and always has >>>>>>>>>>>>>been
pointless.
You are irrelevant.
Your mother has little to do with this although I imagine she is >>>>>>>>>>>mightily
ashamed of you.
Don't be silly. You know who I was referring to, in fact you worked >>>>>>>>>>>it
out
all
by yourself -well done little boy.
and
Golriz Gharaman was found guilty of shoplifting a year ago, and has >>>>>>>>>>>>been punished for that. There has been no complaint recently, >>>>>>>>>>>That is a lie - read the OP. There was a complaint. You are >>>>>>>>>>>irrelevant
extremely rude. Now, piss off little boy.
justabuse gone.
disgraceful slurs and suggestions from nasty and ignorant people who
are politically motivated. If you believe there was a complaint >>>>>>>>>>>>then
prove it . . . .
off topic gone.
There has been no further charge against Gharaman, and will not be. >>>>>>You have not been able to give any evidence to the contrary.
You have been, and are abusing yourself, Tony.
Nothing to apologise for, everything I have written on the subject is >>>>accurate.
You may apologise now, Tony.
But you should apologise for your lies and constant abuse but only a man >>>>would
do that, not a wanker like you, you abusive childish cretin.
Irrelevant. There was a complaint. At no time did I say that the police had >>laid a complaint. You mentioned the police, not me.
From the article:
"The Herald has since revealed Foodstuffs, which owns Pak’nSave, did
not directly complain to police but recorded the incident involving
goods worth less than $150 into the Auror retail crime platform along >>>with around 20,000 other incidents each year.
It was also revealed police tried to introduce the allegation into >>>Ghahraman’s High Court sentencing appeal over four shoplifting >>>convictions in the weeks after it happened."
You may not realise that the supermarket does not control the system;
the police are now being investigated for breaking privacy rules to
have accessed the footage before the court case - see: >>>https://norightturn.blogspot.com/2025/01/how-is-this-legal.html
So much for your allegation of a complaint . . .
The Herald has since revealed Foodstuffs, which owns Pak’nSave, did
not directly complain to police but recorded the incident involving
goods worth less than $150 into the Auror retail crime platform along >>>with around 20,000 other incidents each year.
It was also revealed police tried to introduce the allegation into >>>Ghahraman’s High Court sentencing appeal over four shoplifting >>>convictions in the weeks after it happened.
You may apologise and piss off.
making a complaint and the police confirmed they had not received a >complaint.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 41:18:01 |
| Calls: | 10,392 |
| Files: | 14,064 |
| Messages: | 6,417,209 |