• The Blight has not stopped

    From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 3 14:06:10 2025
    https://norightturn.blogspot.com/2025/01/climate-change-beyond-irresponsible.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Tony on Mon Feb 3 01:49:31 2025
    Tony <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >>https://norightturn.blogspot.com/2025/01/climate-change-beyond-irresponsible.html
    This government doubled the target set by the last shambles of a government >led
    by Ardern and Hipkins. So the article is itself bullshit. And of course it is >from an extreme left wing publication.
    No credibility and no truth in the OP.
    In addition there is of course no need for these targets anyway since the >climate change targets are a scam.
    Oh, at least you got the title right, the blight started by the last government continues, it will take years to even start recovery from the damage they caused.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Mon Feb 3 01:48:11 2025
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote: >https://norightturn.blogspot.com/2025/01/climate-change-beyond-irresponsible.html
    This government doubled the target set by the last shambles of a government led by Ardern and Hipkins. So the article is itself bullshit. And of course it is from an extreme left wing publication.
    No credibility and no truth in the OP.
    In addition there is of course no need for these targets anyway since the climate change targets are a scam.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to blah@blah.blah on Mon Feb 3 18:02:29 2025
    On Mon, 03 Feb 2025 17:32:02 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Feb 2025 14:06:10 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    https://norightturn.blogspot.com/2025/01/climate-change-beyond-irresponsible.html

    What a load of complete and utter shite.

    Man made climate change is a fraud, and until I see incotrovertible
    and measurable evidence that human activity is having an adverse
    effect on the weather, I will continue to go on social media and make
    the case for why it is a fraud.

    The good news is that I, and others, have convinced people who used to >believe all the bullshit to change their minds, and some of them are
    now fighting the good fight and making the same case to even more
    people.

    Small victories I would concede, but thankfully more and more people
    are starting to see through the climate deception.

    As for Luxon, the best advice anyone could give him would be that he
    should never try to appease people who will never vote for him.
    That is a clear majority of people - it is not even clear whether
    National Party supporters would vote for him at the next election, but
    that all seems irrelevant to not trying to appease trading partners,
    where two of our trading agreements have meeting targets as a
    condition . . .



    Bill.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BR@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 3 17:32:02 2025
    On Mon, 03 Feb 2025 14:06:10 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    https://norightturn.blogspot.com/2025/01/climate-change-beyond-irresponsible.html

    What a load of complete and utter shite.

    Man made climate change is a fraud, and until I see incotrovertible
    and measurable evidence that human activity is having an adverse
    effect on the weather, I will continue to go on social media and make
    the case for why it is a fraud.

    The good news is that I, and others, have convinced people who used to
    believe all the bullshit to change their minds, and some of them are
    now fighting the good fight and making the same case to even more
    people.

    Small victories I would concede, but thankfully more and more people
    are starting to see through the climate deception.

    As for Luxon, the best advice anyone could give him would be that he
    should never try to appease people who will never vote for him.

    Bill.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Mon Feb 3 06:43:48 2025
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 03 Feb 2025 17:32:02 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Feb 2025 14:06:10 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
    https://norightturn.blogspot.com/2025/01/climate-change-beyond-irresponsible.html

    What a load of complete and utter shite.

    Man made climate change is a fraud, and until I see incotrovertible
    and measurable evidence that human activity is having an adverse
    effect on the weather, I will continue to go on social media and make
    the case for why it is a fraud.

    The good news is that I, and others, have convinced people who used to >>believe all the bullshit to change their minds, and some of them are
    now fighting the good fight and making the same case to even more
    people.

    Small victories I would concede, but thankfully more and more people
    are starting to see through the climate deception.

    As for Luxon, the best advice anyone could give him would be that he
    should never try to appease people who will never vote for him.
    That is a clear majority of people
    Prove it - you cannot!
    - it is not even clear whether
    National Party supporters would vote for him at the next election, but
    that all seems irrelevant to not trying to appease trading partners,
    where two of our trading agreements have meeting targets as a
    condition . . .
    There is no agreement that we cannot re-negotiate or walk away from.
    We don't need to appease other countries. Until the big polluters do their bit we will be destroying our economy for nothing.
    Even if they do "their bit" it will not change the climate. There is no valid science that disagrees with that statement. Man made climate change, other than trivial amounts, is a myth.



    Bill.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Mon Feb 3 18:21:56 2025
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 06:43:48 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 03 Feb 2025 17:32:02 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Feb 2025 14:06:10 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>>wrote:
    https://norightturn.blogspot.com/2025/01/climate-change-beyond-irresponsible.html

    What a load of complete and utter shite.

    Man made climate change is a fraud, and until I see incotrovertible
    and measurable evidence that human activity is having an adverse
    effect on the weather, I will continue to go on social media and make >>>>the case for why it is a fraud.

    The good news is that I, and others, have convinced people who used to >>>>believe all the bullshit to change their minds, and some of them are >>>>now fighting the good fight and making the same case to even more >>>>people.

    Small victories I would concede, but thankfully more and more people >>>>are starting to see through the climate deception.

    As for Luxon, the best advice anyone could give him would be that he >>>>should never try to appease people who will never vote for him.
    That is a clear majority of people
    Prove it - you cannot!

    The November Curia Poll put National support at 38.8%,
    Off topic
    but you were
    talking about Luxon
    No I was not - you pathetic troll.
    who only got 26.5% as preferred Prime Minister,
    but either way, there is a clear majority who will never vote for
    Luxon.
    As I wrote "Prove it" you have not and cannot.
    Happy now?
    Always happy to see you make a fool of yourself.


    - it is not even clear whether
    National Party supporters would vote for him at the next election, but >>>that all seems irrelevant to not trying to appease trading partners, >>>where two of our trading agreements have meeting targets as a
    condition . . .
    There is no agreement that we cannot re-negotiate or walk away from. >Absolutely - but how is that better than the other side walking away
    from us?
    Non-sequitur nonsense. The two are not interchangeable and do not depend on each other. You are no friend to logic.

    We don't need to appease other countries. Until the big polluters do their >>bit
    we will be destroying our economy for nothing.
    Well we are paying the ACT/NZ1st/Nat coalition to destroy our economy
    now
    Pathetic rhetoric. The economy is healthier now thatn it has been in 7 years.
    - how is it better to not have money coming in from exports, Tony?
    Who said anything about exports?

    Even if they do "their bit" it will not change the climate. There is no valid >>science that disagrees with that statement. Man made climate change, other >>than
    trivial amounts, is a myth.



    Bill.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Mon Feb 3 20:17:17 2025
    On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 06:43:48 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Mon, 03 Feb 2025 17:32:02 +1300, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Mon, 03 Feb 2025 14:06:10 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>>wrote:
    https://norightturn.blogspot.com/2025/01/climate-change-beyond-irresponsible.html

    What a load of complete and utter shite.

    Man made climate change is a fraud, and until I see incotrovertible
    and measurable evidence that human activity is having an adverse
    effect on the weather, I will continue to go on social media and make
    the case for why it is a fraud.

    The good news is that I, and others, have convinced people who used to >>>believe all the bullshit to change their minds, and some of them are
    now fighting the good fight and making the same case to even more
    people.

    Small victories I would concede, but thankfully more and more people
    are starting to see through the climate deception.

    As for Luxon, the best advice anyone could give him would be that he >>>should never try to appease people who will never vote for him.
    That is a clear majority of people
    Prove it - you cannot!

    The November Curia Poll put National support at 38.8%, but you were
    talking about Luxon, who only got 26.5% as preferred Prime Minister,
    but either way, there is a clear majority who will never vote for
    Luxon. Happy now?


    - it is not even clear whether
    National Party supporters would vote for him at the next election, but
    that all seems irrelevant to not trying to appease trading partners,
    where two of our trading agreements have meeting targets as a
    condition . . .
    There is no agreement that we cannot re-negotiate or walk away from. Absolutely - but how is that better than the other side walking away
    from us?

    We don't need to appease other countries. Until the big polluters do their bit >we will be destroying our economy for nothing.
    Well we are paying the ACT/NZ1st/Nat coalition to destroy our economy
    now - how is it better to not have money coming in from exports, Tony?

    Even if they do "their bit" it will not change the climate. There is no valid >science that disagrees with that statement. Man made climate change, other than
    trivial amounts, is a myth.



    Bill.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)