• Dame Jenny Shipley

    From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 6 09:29:58 2025
    Speaking at present on Radio New Zealand about The Treaty and the
    Waitangi celebrations.

    Shipley has not always acted either well or honorably, but her
    interview this morning is, while she still acts as an apologist for
    the National Party, a good summary of the situation regarding
    relationships between Maori and other New Zealanders, and she
    expresses views that a large majority of New Zealanders can readily
    agree with. She acknowledges the deliberate deception and views that
    are being pushed by a small minority that are misleading some New
    Zealanders, but is otherwise positive and sensible in the views she
    expresses. Well worth listening to.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Thu Feb 6 01:46:33 2025
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    Speaking at present on Radio New Zealand about The Treaty and the
    Waitangi celebrations.

    Shipley has not always acted either well or honorably, but her
    interview this morning is, while she still acts as an apologist for
    the National Party, a good summary of the situation regarding
    relationships between Maori and other New Zealanders, and she
    expresses views that a large majority of New Zealanders can readily
    agree with. She acknowledges the deliberate deception and views that
    are being pushed by a small minority that are misleading some New
    Zealanders, but is otherwise positive and sensible in the views she >expresses. Well worth listening to.
    I agree - the small minority of Maori, mainly TPM are leading the deception. The vast majority of Maori are in favour of working with the rest of New Zealand forlk.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Crash@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 6 15:25:59 2025
    On Thu, 06 Feb 2025 09:29:58 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    Speaking at present on Radio New Zealand about The Treaty and the
    Waitangi celebrations.

    Shipley has not always acted either well or honorably, but her
    interview this morning is, while she still acts as an apologist for
    the National Party, a good summary of the situation regarding
    relationships between Maori and other New Zealanders, and she
    expresses views that a large majority of New Zealanders can readily
    agree with. She acknowledges the deliberate deception and views that
    are being pushed by a small minority that are misleading some New
    Zealanders, but is otherwise positive and sensible in the views she >expresses. Well worth listening to.

    Shipley is not an authority on the Treaty and related issues. The
    interest in her is purely as a former PM from more than 20 years ago,
    who was a long time National party MP who never won an election as PM.
    I listened to a replay for about 5 minutes before deciding that what
    she had to say was neither enlightening nor relevant.

    With respect to the Waitangi celebrations this week, we are reminded
    that Maori culture as practiced today revolves primarily around verbal
    violence aka the Haka. The Maori answer to anything they don't want
    to hear from any proponent expressing an opinion is to perform a Haka.
    In European terms this is the equivalent to shouting down a speaker at
    a protest. The aim of both is clear - to shut the speaker down.

    No-one who opposes Acts Treaty Principles Bill has ever been specific
    on why - they just make a broad claim about it removing the rights of
    Maori without specifying how. There has been no debate on this where
    those opposed can quote any wording of the bill and then logically
    claim any loss of rights. Proponents of the bill have been clear on
    the aims.

    Equally, everyone seems to have forgotten that this bill was agreed to
    by National as a part of their coalition agreement with ACT with
    provision that it will be voted down at the second reading
    irrespective of what a Select Committee says. There is value in the
    Select Committee with analysis of submissions for and against that
    will come in useful if we ever get to a point where anything similar
    will be considered again.



    --
    Crash McBash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 6 19:35:06 2025
    On Thu, 06 Feb 2025 15:25:59 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 06 Feb 2025 09:29:58 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    Speaking at present on Radio New Zealand about The Treaty and the
    Waitangi celebrations.

    Shipley has not always acted either well or honorably, but her
    interview this morning is, while she still acts as an apologist for
    the National Party, a good summary of the situation regarding >>relationships between Maori and other New Zealanders, and she
    expresses views that a large majority of New Zealanders can readily
    agree with. She acknowledges the deliberate deception and views that
    are being pushed by a small minority that are misleading some New >>Zealanders, but is otherwise positive and sensible in the views she >>expresses. Well worth listening to.

    Shipley is not an authority on the Treaty and related issues. The
    interest in her is purely as a former PM from more than 20 years ago,
    who was a long time National party MP who never won an election as PM.
    I listened to a replay for about 5 minutes before deciding that what
    she had to say was neither enlightening nor relevant.
    I agree that she has not always been a shining light for anyone, but
    in this speech she is expressing some that are held by a large
    majority of New Zealanders - as she points out the ACT Party and
    Seymour are a small minority; and in referring to misrepresentation
    she was clearly referring to elements of the Bill and Seymour's
    excuses for why his party had put it forward. It is clearly
    embarrassing to National that Luxon was such a poor negotiator in the
    coalition agreements, and is having to hide while others carry the
    arguments that he missed


    With respect to the Waitangi celebrations this week, we are reminded
    that Maori culture as practiced today revolves primarily around verbal >violence aka the Haka. The Maori answer to anything they don't want
    to hear from any proponent expressing an opinion is to perform a Haka.
    In European terms this is the equivalent to shouting down a speaker at
    a protest. The aim of both is clear - to shut the speaker down.

    Which is untrue, but in any event has nothing to do with Jenny Shipley
    or the arguments about the Treaty


    No-one who opposes Acts Treaty Principles Bill has ever been specific
    on why - they just make a broad claim about it removing the rights of
    Maori without specifying how. There has been no debate on this where
    those opposed can quote any wording of the bill and then logically
    claim any loss of rights. Proponents of the bill have been clear on
    the aims.
    Rubbish - ACT want to unilaterally break a contract and impose their
    political will. They are wrong, but thankfully the publicity is making
    more New Zealanders appreciate that ACT are untrustworthy and should
    not be supported at the next election.

    Equally, everyone seems to have forgotten that this bill was agreed to
    by National as a part of their coalition agreement with ACT with
    provision that it will be voted down at the second reading
    irrespective of what a Select Committee says. There is value in the
    Select Committee with analysis of submissions for and against that
    will come in useful if we ever get to a point where anything similar
    will be considered again.

    See above - it is a huge embarrassment to Luxon - to have to get
    Shipley to try and cover for him shows how badly he misjudged ACT. The
    verbal submissions are likely to reflect written submissions - listen
    for yourself. Your comments do however remind us that ACT has imposed
    a huge cost of extended hearings - the silence from the so-called NZ
    Taxpayers Union is tellingly silent on the huge waste of money and of
    time by MPs and public servants - they are clearly a highly political organisation that uses deception to push unpopular ideas through
    deception . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Crash@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 6 21:23:02 2025
    On Thu, 06 Feb 2025 19:35:06 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 06 Feb 2025 15:25:59 +1300, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 06 Feb 2025 09:29:58 +1300, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:

    Speaking at present on Radio New Zealand about The Treaty and the >>>Waitangi celebrations.

    Shipley has not always acted either well or honorably, but her
    interview this morning is, while she still acts as an apologist for
    the National Party, a good summary of the situation regarding >>>relationships between Maori and other New Zealanders, and she
    expresses views that a large majority of New Zealanders can readily
    agree with. She acknowledges the deliberate deception and views that
    are being pushed by a small minority that are misleading some New >>>Zealanders, but is otherwise positive and sensible in the views she >>>expresses. Well worth listening to.

    Shipley is not an authority on the Treaty and related issues. The
    interest in her is purely as a former PM from more than 20 years ago,
    who was a long time National party MP who never won an election as PM.
    I listened to a replay for about 5 minutes before deciding that what
    she had to say was neither enlightening nor relevant.
    I agree that she has not always been a shining light for anyone, but
    in this speech she is expressing some that are held by a large
    majority of New Zealanders - as she points out the ACT Party and
    Seymour are a small minority; and in referring to misrepresentation
    she was clearly referring to elements of the Bill and Seymour's
    excuses for why his party had put it forward.

    It was part of their policy - well announced before the election.

    It is clearly
    embarrassing to National that Luxon was such a poor negotiator in the >coalition agreements,

    What a puerile statement. He cobbled together the current government
    that is still in place. Those who consider him to be a poor
    negotiator would be purely ideologues who will never vote for National
    or ACT.

    and is having to hide while others carry the
    arguments that he missed

    Ngai Tahu demonstrated how to treat a PM even while including
    anti-government protest. Contrast this with the humiliation meted out
    to Helen Clark, Don Brash and David Seymour at Waitangi on our
    national day.


    With respect to the Waitangi celebrations this week, we are reminded
    that Maori culture as practiced today revolves primarily around verbal >>violence aka the Haka. The Maori answer to anything they don't want
    to hear from any proponent expressing an opinion is to perform a Haka.
    In European terms this is the equivalent to shouting down a speaker at
    a protest. The aim of both is clear - to shut the speaker down.

    Which is untrue, but in any event has nothing to do with Jenny Shipley
    or the arguments about the Treaty

    So you think that the manner and verbal violence against the proponent
    of the Treaty Principles Act is off topic when it was a major part of
    what she spoke about? What an irrational point of view.

    No-one who opposes Acts Treaty Principles Bill has ever been specific
    on why - they just make a broad claim about it removing the rights of
    Maori without specifying how. There has been no debate on this where
    those opposed can quote any wording of the bill and then logically
    claim any loss of rights. Proponents of the bill have been clear on
    the aims.
    Rubbish - ACT want to unilaterally break a contract and impose their >political will. They are wrong, but thankfully the publicity is making
    more New Zealanders appreciate that ACT are untrustworthy and should
    not be supported at the next election.

    ACT simply want define the Treaty Principles in an Act of Parliament,
    after ratification via a referendum, to fill the void created by other
    Acts and un elected bodies such as the Waitangi Tribunal and the
    Judiciary. Those opposed to the bill clearly fear that equality for
    all will reduce their current rights.

    Equally, everyone seems to have forgotten that this bill was agreed to
    by National as a part of their coalition agreement with ACT with
    provision that it will be voted down at the second reading
    irrespective of what a Select Committee says. There is value in the
    Select Committee with analysis of submissions for and against that
    will come in useful if we ever get to a point where anything similar
    will be considered again.

    See above - it is a huge embarrassment to Luxon - to have to get
    Shipley to try and cover for him shows how badly he misjudged ACT. The
    verbal submissions are likely to reflect written submissions - listen
    for yourself. Your comments do however remind us that ACT has imposed
    a huge cost of extended hearings - the silence from the so-called NZ >Taxpayers Union is tellingly silent on the huge waste of money and of
    time by MPs and public servants - they are clearly a highly political >organisation that uses deception to push unpopular ideas through
    deception . . .

    The Treaty Principles Bill arose from ACT party policy. There are a
    number of initiatives from the minor parties that the Government is
    acting on. Those that voted for these 3 parties clearly support this
    so when we come to wasted Government spending there are hugely greater
    issues than this.

    It should be noted, since you comment on this, that the TU is taking a significant anti-government stance on their fiscal actions (or lack of
    them).


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)