1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. NZ.GENERAL

  • What climate emergency?

    From Tony@21:1/5 to All on Thu Feb 27 22:36:51 2025
    XPost: nz.politics

    Well it seems there is no such emergency. https://centrist.nz/behind-the-scarelines-sometimes-big-numbers-dont-really-mean-much/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=26-2-2025&_kx=r-9yRwOooklJ4fu8JfYI0L2yjNQJoEDhB4PntHsLeWo.VYfxNg
    Better to spend the money mitigating the climate changes that are occuring.
    We obviously cannot stop the changes.
    We are not causing them unless, for the very first time, somebody produces scientific evidence that says we are.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Fri Feb 28 13:15:24 2025
    XPost: nz.politics

    On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 22:36:51 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Well it seems there is no such emergency. >https://centrist.nz/behind-the-scarelines-sometimes-big-numbers-dont-really-mean-much/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=26-2-2025&_kx=r-9yRwOooklJ4fu8JfYI0L2yjNQJoEDhB4PntHsLeWo.VYfxNg
    Better to spend the money mitigating the climate changes that are occuring. >We obviously cannot stop the changes.
    We are not causing them unless, for the very first time, somebody produces >scientific evidence that says we are.

    Fires, floods, land slips, glaciers disappearing, and more fires -
    they are happening with greater frequency than previously . . .

    It is not obvious that we cannot stop at least some part of the
    changes, and not even trying is potentially even more expensive for
    our country.

    I would rather believe scientists than a website that is part of the
    Atlas Network - currently favoured by Trump, Luxon and Seymour!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Fri Feb 28 03:21:59 2025
    XPost: nz.politics

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 22:36:51 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Well it seems there is no such emergency. >>https://centrist.nz/behind-the-scarelines-sometimes-big-numbers-dont-really-mean-much/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=26-2-2025&_kx=r-9yRwOooklJ4fu8JfYI0L2yjNQJoEDhB4PntHsLeWo.VYfxNg
    Better to spend the money mitigating the climate changes that are occuring. >>We obviously cannot stop the changes.
    We are not causing them unless, for the very first time, somebody produces >>scientific evidence that says we are.

    Fires, floods, land slips, glaciers disappearing, and more fires -
    they are happening with greater frequency than previously . . .
    Off topic. We know the climate is changing, do try to keep on track.

    It is not obvious that we cannot stop at least some part of the
    changes, and not even trying is potentially even more expensive for
    our country.
    Nobody is saying we should not mitigate the damage, you are still off topic.

    I would rather believe scientists than a website that is part of the
    Atlas Network - currently favoured by Trump, Luxon and Seymour!
    There are no scientists that have *ever* proved that there is a climate emergency - so find one or get on topic.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to lizandtony@orcon.net.nz on Fri Feb 28 17:44:14 2025
    On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 03:21:59 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 22:36:51 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Well it seems there is no such emergency. >>>https://centrist.nz/behind-the-scarelines-sometimes-big-numbers-dont-really-mean-much/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=26-2-2025&_kx=r-9yRwOooklJ4fu8JfYI0L2yjNQJoEDhB4PntHsLeWo.VYfxNg
    Better to spend the money mitigating the climate changes that are occuring. >>>We obviously cannot stop the changes.
    We are not causing them unless, for the very first time, somebody produces >>>scientific evidence that says we are.

    Fires, floods, land slips, glaciers disappearing, and more fires -
    they are happening with greater frequency than previously . . .
    Off topic. We know the climate is changing, do try to keep on track.

    It is not obvious that we cannot stop at least some part of the
    changes, and not even trying is potentially even more expensive for
    our country.
    Nobody is saying we should not mitigate the damage, you are still off topic. >>
    I would rather believe scientists than a website that is part of the
    Atlas Network - currently favoured by Trump, Luxon and Seymour!
    There are no scientists that have *ever* proved that there is a climate >emergency - so find one or get on topic.

    The increasing incidence of such adverse climate events does to many
    people represent an emergency, particularly as it has been shown that
    human actions are making it worse. But don't worry Tony - with your
    limited future you may well not have to try to survive adverse weather
    events that may shorten the lives of generations younger than you.
    "Wot Me Worry!" could be your slogan, "Right", Tony?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Rich80105@hotmail.com on Fri Feb 28 06:22:16 2025
    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 03:21:59 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 22:36:51 -0000 (UTC), Tony
    <lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:

    Well it seems there is no such emergency. >>>>https://centrist.nz/behind-the-scarelines-sometimes-big-numbers-dont-really-mean-much/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=26-2-2025&_kx=r-9yRwOooklJ4fu8JfYI0L2yjNQJoEDhB4PntHsLeWo.VYfxNg
    Better to spend the money mitigating the climate changes that are occuring. >>>>We obviously cannot stop the changes.
    We are not causing them unless, for the very first time, somebody produces >>>>scientific evidence that says we are.

    Fires, floods, land slips, glaciers disappearing, and more fires -
    they are happening with greater frequency than previously . . .
    Off topic. We know the climate is changing, do try to keep on track.

    It is not obvious that we cannot stop at least some part of the
    changes, and not even trying is potentially even more expensive for
    our country.
    Nobody is saying we should not mitigate the damage, you are still off topic. >>>
    I would rather believe scientists than a website that is part of the >>>Atlas Network - currently favoured by Trump, Luxon and Seymour!
    There are no scientists that have *ever* proved that there is a climate >>emergency - so find one or get on topic.

    The increasing incidence of such adverse climate events does to many
    people represent an emergency, particularly as it has been shown that
    human actions are making it worse.
    No such thing has been shown - provide evidence, but you cannot - it does not exist.

    Filthy, racist abuse removed. Rich is a cretin and a sociopath - a very rare combination but evident in his/her/its case.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)