https://archive.md/tIxfc
This artcle points out what we have hinted at on this ng. Green energy does >not devliver 24/7 which means that you need a backup system, both in >generation and network.
True NZ can reduce the demand for hydro power to save water for the times
the sun does not shine and the wind does not blow, but at the end of the day >the green power will cost more as it is has a great % of down time.
On 10 Mar 2025 03:27:47 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Nope, just another of your oft-repeated lies.
https://archive.md/tIxfc
This artcle points out what we have hinted at on this ng. Green energy does >>not devliver 24/7 which means that you need a backup system, both in >>generation and network.
True NZ can reduce the demand for hydro power to save water for the times >>the sun does not shine and the wind does not blow, but at the end of the day >>the green power will cost more as it is has a great % of down time.
I can understand your disappointment that the current government did
not proceed with improving water storage to give a very cheap way of >increasing our ability to generate using hydro, but looking after
landlords and tobacco companies was more important to Seymour and
Luxon . . . - and more important than putting money in any one else's
pockets either.
I haven't seen a wind turbine catch fire as in the illustration in the >article. One of the generating companies has had resource consent for
a solar development for quite a few years now, but profits are helped
by the need to use coal fired generation every so often, and that has
a higher priority than system efficiency. The reality is that the
"Bradford Reforms" that part privatised our electricity companies was
bad for consumers, and for the country - as a lot of the shareholders
are from overseas . . . .
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Which you are unable to either identify or "correct" . . .
On 10 Mar 2025 03:27:47 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Nope, just another of your oft-repeated lies.
https://archive.md/tIxfc
This artcle points out what we have hinted at on this ng. Green energy does >>>not devliver 24/7 which means that you need a backup system, both in >>>generation and network.
True NZ can reduce the demand for hydro power to save water for the times >>>the sun does not shine and the wind does not blow, but at the end of the day >>>the green power will cost more as it is has a great % of down time.
I can understand your disappointment that the current government did
not proceed with improving water storage to give a very cheap way of >>increasing our ability to generate using hydro, but looking after
landlords and tobacco companies was more important to Seymour and
Luxon . . . - and more important than putting money in any one else's >>pockets either.
I haven't seen a wind turbine catch fire as in the illustration in the >>article. One of the generating companies has had resource consent for
a solar development for quite a few years now, but profits are helped
by the need to use coal fired generation every so often, and that has
a higher priority than system efficiency. The reality is that the
"Bradford Reforms" that part privatised our electricity companies was
bad for consumers, and for the country - as a lot of the shareholders
are from overseas . . . .
On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 23:36:19 -0000 (UTC), TonyOf course I identified it - I said it was a lie (that is identification), and indeed a lie it is.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Which you are unable to either identify or "correct" . . .
On 10 Mar 2025 03:27:47 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Nope, just another of your oft-repeated lies.
https://archive.md/tIxfc
This artcle points out what we have hinted at on this ng. Green energy does >>>>not devliver 24/7 which means that you need a backup system, both in >>>>generation and network.
True NZ can reduce the demand for hydro power to save water for the times >>>>the sun does not shine and the wind does not blow, but at the end of the day
the green power will cost more as it is has a great % of down time.
I can understand your disappointment that the current government did
not proceed with improving water storage to give a very cheap way of >>>increasing our ability to generate using hydro, but looking after >>>landlords and tobacco companies was more important to Seymour and
Luxon . . . - and more important than putting money in any one else's >>>pockets either.
I haven't seen a wind turbine catch fire as in the illustration in the >>>article. One of the generating companies has had resource consent for
a solar development for quite a few years now, but profits are helped
by the need to use coal fired generation every so often, and that has
a higher priority than system efficiency. The reality is that the >>>"Bradford Reforms" that part privatised our electricity companies was
bad for consumers, and for the country - as a lot of the shareholders
are from overseas . . . .
On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 06:08:02 -0000 (UTC), TonyThe one you made that I reponded to - do get some help.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 23:36:19 -0000 (UTC), TonyOf course I identified it - I said it was a lie (that is identification), and >>indeed a lie it is.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Which you are unable to either identify or "correct" . . .
On 10 Mar 2025 03:27:47 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Nope, just another of your oft-repeated lies.
https://archive.md/tIxfc
This artcle points out what we have hinted at on this ng. Green energy >>>>>>does
not devliver 24/7 which means that you need a backup system, both in >>>>>>generation and network.
True NZ can reduce the demand for hydro power to save water for the times >>>>>>the sun does not shine and the wind does not blow, but at the end of the >>>>>>day
the green power will cost more as it is has a great % of down time.
I can understand your disappointment that the current government did >>>>>not proceed with improving water storage to give a very cheap way of >>>>>increasing our ability to generate using hydro, but looking after >>>>>landlords and tobacco companies was more important to Seymour and >>>>>Luxon . . . - and more important than putting money in any one else's >>>>>pockets either.
I haven't seen a wind turbine catch fire as in the illustration in the >>>>>article. One of the generating companies has had resource consent for >>>>>a solar development for quite a few years now, but profits are helped >>>>>by the need to use coal fired generation every so often, and that has >>>>>a higher priority than system efficiency. The reality is that the >>>>>"Bradford Reforms" that part privatised our electricity companies was >>>>>bad for consumers, and for the country - as a lot of the shareholders >>>>>are from overseas . . . .
What statement do you claim is a lie?
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 23:36:19 -0000 (UTC), TonyOf course I identified it - I said it was a lie (that is identification), and >indeed a lie it is.
<lizandtony@orcon.net.nz> wrote:
Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> wrote:Which you are unable to either identify or "correct" . . .
On 10 Mar 2025 03:27:47 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:Nope, just another of your oft-repeated lies.
https://archive.md/tIxfc
This artcle points out what we have hinted at on this ng. Green energy does
not devliver 24/7 which means that you need a backup system, both in >>>>>generation and network.
True NZ can reduce the demand for hydro power to save water for the times >>>>>the sun does not shine and the wind does not blow, but at the end of the day
the green power will cost more as it is has a great % of down time.
I can understand your disappointment that the current government did >>>>not proceed with improving water storage to give a very cheap way of >>>>increasing our ability to generate using hydro, but looking after >>>>landlords and tobacco companies was more important to Seymour and
Luxon . . . - and more important than putting money in any one else's >>>>pockets either.
I haven't seen a wind turbine catch fire as in the illustration in the >>>>article. One of the generating companies has had resource consent for
a solar development for quite a few years now, but profits are helped >>>>by the need to use coal fired generation every so often, and that has
a higher priority than system efficiency. The reality is that the >>>>"Bradford Reforms" that part privatised our electricity companies was >>>>bad for consumers, and for the country - as a lot of the shareholders >>>>are from overseas . . . .
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 13:17:12 |
| Calls: | 10,389 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 14,061 |
| Messages: | 6,416,887 |
| Posted today: | 1 |