• Energy Minister

    From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 17 03:43:58 2025
    Watts his name ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Crash@21:1/5 to ldo@nz.invalid on Mon Mar 17 19:33:24 2025
    On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 03:43:58 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
    <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    Watts his name ...

    A bit slow off the mark, Lawrence, Watts was appointed late January.


    --
    Crash McBash

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to ldo@nz.invalid on Mon Mar 17 20:51:42 2025
    On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 03:43:58 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
    <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    Watts his name ...

    An interesting article today - https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/new-energy-minister-simon-watts-warned-of-risk-of-outages-business-closures-in-challenging-sector/N27BREOSQBF67GAQCTGW2MOI6Y/

    That article covers a briefing he received as incoming Minister, and
    gives advice about prices and supply. Unfortunately the industry has
    incentives to just meet supply, preferably through having to use
    Huntly coal fired station every so often - it keeps prices and hence
    dividends very high. Rather than just accepting that those companies
    are the only way of arranging more commercial generation, the
    government should insist that 'fair' payments be made for generation
    fed back to the grid, to encourage private generation to be directed
    to the network when not needed - thus for example schools could
    benefit from solar on their roofs and have generation available during holidays. Also the government should deliberately invest directly in
    some generation, or alternatively penalise any generator that has
    resource consents and does not use them within a reasonable time.

    At present we have cartel designed to maximise dividends to owners -
    just under half being largely to large investors, some overseas . . .

    I understand a project to create a wind-farm off the Taranaki Coast
    has been stopped because of plans for sea-bed mining - it appears that political considerations may be adversely affecting sensible overall development

    No wonder that the government is now needing to subside fuel for
    increasing numbers of people who could not otherwise afford power,
    that two factories have already closed with another closure likely in
    Auckland. Still, this government doesn't care about the unemployed -
    treat them badly enough and the skilled workers will just go to
    another country . . .

    Another possibility (not mentioned in the briefing paper) would be to restructure the industry to require separation between generation and distribution.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 17 21:43:47 2025
    On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 20:51:42 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 03:43:58 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    Watts his name ...

    Has he progressed to megawatts, or at least kilowatts, yet?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to ldo@nz.invalid on Tue Mar 18 11:21:04 2025
    On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 21:43:47 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
    <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 20:51:42 +1300, Rich80105 wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 03:43:58 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
    <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    Watts his name ...

    Has he progressed to megawatts, or at least kilowatts, yet?

    The 's' does indicate more than one, but I suspect an inherited name
    has little predictive value . . .

    Luxon can rest easy - no threat there.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)