1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. NZ.GENERAL

  • NZ First members Bill

    From Gordon@21:1/5 to All on Tue Apr 22 02:19:35 2025
    https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360605837/stuff-politics-live-blog

    It all started off by someone asking the question as to What is a woman?
    Matt Walsh else did a documentary on it.

    Then the UK highest court agreed with the common understanding of
    what a woman was, “an adult human biological female”

    Now Winston is proposing that that NZ does the same thing. Make it clear as
    to who a woman is. By doing this we can stop all the debate on what a woman
    is.

    Let us see how this progresses as it does not involve race, but it does
    involve gender.

    The paralells with the Treaty Principles Bill is clear. Pity the Treaty case
    is not so clear, or easy to solve.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to Gordon on Tue Apr 22 07:13:14 2025
    Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote: >https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360605837/stuff-politics-live-blog

    It all started off by someone asking the question as to What is a woman?
    Matt Walsh else did a documentary on it.

    Then the UK highest court agreed with the common understanding of
    what a woman was, “an adult human biological female”

    Now Winston is proposing that that NZ does the same thing. Make it clear as >to who a woman is. By doing this we can stop all the debate on what a woman >is.

    Let us see how this progresses as it does not involve race, but it does >involve gender.

    The paralells with the Treaty Principles Bill is clear. Pity the Treaty case >is not so clear, or easy to solve.
    Winston is doing what Winston does.
    The question really is how did we ever reach the ridiculous situation where someone thinks we need to have a definition set in law.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)