https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360664802/where-has-all-covid-gone
This is somewhat interesting. It is not the same old, same old but has some "new" points.
"This is attributed to the level of immunity in the community making it
hard for the virus to
mutate." No metion of the vaccines affect.
"So low, in fact, they are the lowest that expert modeller Michael Plank
has seen since Omicron’s arrival in early 2022.
But low does not mean gone, and people should still be getting their
vaccine boosters, he added."
Really, why when the evidence has shown that the the vaccines are only good for adding profit to the manufactuers.
“Most people have now had multiple vaccines, and potentially have had Covid-19 multiple times as well. And so with a broader level of protection, it makes it harder for the virus to mutate its way around.”
Lets get back to bsiscs, a vaccine is supposed to make one immune to the virus and yet here we have multi jabs abd getting the disease. Safe and effective, and get another booster.
So slowly the mainstream media are coming to the real world situation, walking their narrative of 4 odd years ago back.
On 2025-04-24 23:33:58 +0000, Gordon said:The lower level of infection is certainly an effect of the levels of immunisation - do you have any evidence to the contrary?
https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360664802/where-has-all-covid-gone
This is somewhat interesting. It is not the same old, same old but has some >> "new" points.
"This is attributed to the level of immunity in the community making it
hard for the virus to
mutate." No metion of the vaccines affect.
"So low, in fact, they are the lowest that expert modeller Michael Plank
has seen since Omicrons arrival in early 2022.
But low does not mean gone, and people should still be getting their
vaccine boosters, he added."
Really, why when the evidence has shown that the the vaccines are only good >> for adding profit to the manufactuers.
Very few vaccines give immunisation - most however do greatly reduce
Most people have now had multiple vaccines, and potentially have had
Covid-19 multiple times as well. And so with a broader level of protection, >> it makes it harder for the virus to mutate its way around.
Lets get back to bsiscs, a vaccine is supposed to make one immune to the
virus and yet here we have multi jabs abd getting the disease. Safe and
effective, and get another booster.
Not at all in relation to Covid. There do appear to be additional
So slowly the mainstream media are coming to the real world situation,
walking their narrative of 4 odd years ago back.
There are other vaccines which require regular boosters to keep your
immune system ready. For example, tetanus - even if you don't get a
booster yourself, the hospital will often give you one if you have a
deep cut or operation.
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 12:46:36 +1200, It's A Me <its-a-me@mario.com>
wrote:
On 2025-04-24 23:33:58 +0000, Gordon said:The lower level of infection is certainly an effect of the levels of >immunisation - do you have any evidence to the contrary?
https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360664802/where-has-all-covid-gone
This is somewhat interesting. It is not the same old, same old but has some >>> "new" points.
"This is attributed to the level of immunity in the community making it
hard for the virus to
mutate." No metion of the vaccines affect.
"So low, in fact, they are the lowest that expert modeller Michael Plank >>> has seen since Omicrons arrival in early 2022.
But low does not mean gone, and people should still be getting their
vaccine boosters, he added."
Really, why when the evidence has shown that the the vaccines are only good >>> for adding profit to the manufactuers.
I am not aware of any such evidence - do you have a credible reference
to any such conclusion by any reputable scientific organisation?
Whya re you answering items posted by one poster but to a different poster. Your holiday clearly didn't help.Very few vaccines give immunisation - most however do greatly reduce
Most people have now had multiple vaccines, and potentially have had
Covid-19 multiple times as well. And so with a broader level of protection, >>> it makes it harder for the virus to mutate its way around.
Lets get back to bsiscs, a vaccine is supposed to make one immune to the >>> virus and yet here we have multi jabs abd getting the disease. Safe and
effective, and get another booster.
the risk of virus infection
Not at all in relation to Covid. There do appear to be additional
So slowly the mainstream media are coming to the real world situation,
walking their narrative of 4 odd years ago back.
dangers in repeated infection with Covid, possibly especially in the
elderly and the very young.
There are other vaccines which require regular boosters to keep your
immune system ready. For example, tetanus - even if you don't get a
booster yourself, the hospital will often give you one if you have a
deep cut or operation.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360664802/where-has-all-covid-gone
This is somewhat interesting. It is not the same old, same old but has some >"new" points.
"This is attributed to the level of immunity in the community making it hard for the virus to
mutate." No metion of the vaccines affect.
"So low, in fact, they are the lowest that expert modeller Michael Plank
has seen since Omicrons arrival in early 2022.
But low does not mean gone, and people should still be getting their
vaccine boosters, he added."
Really, why when the evidence has shown that the the vaccines are only good >for adding profit to the manufactuers.
Most people have now had multiple vaccines, and potentially have had >Covid-19 multiple times as well. And so with a broader level of protection, >it makes it harder for the virus to mutate its way around.
Lets get back to bsiscs, a vaccine is supposed to make one immune to the >virus and yet here we have multi jabs abd getting the disease. Safe and >effective, and get another booster.
So slowly the mainstream media are coming to the real world situation, >walking their narrative of 4 odd years ago back.
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 12:46:36 +1200, It's A Me <its-a-me@mario.com>
wrote:
On 2025-04-24 23:33:58 +0000, Gordon said:The lower level of infection is certainly an effect of the levels of >immunisation - do you have any evidence to the contrary?
https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360664802/where-has-all-covid-gone
This is somewhat interesting. It is not the same old, same old but has some >>> "new" points.
"This is attributed to the level of immunity in the community making it
hard for the virus to
mutate." No metion of the vaccines affect.
"So low, in fact, they are the lowest that expert modeller Michael Plank >>> has seen since Omicrons arrival in early 2022.
But low does not mean gone, and people should still be getting their
vaccine boosters, he added."
Really, why when the evidence has shown that the the vaccines are only good >>> for adding profit to the manufactuers.
I am not aware of any such evidence - do you have a credible reference
to any such conclusion by any reputable scientific organisation?
Very few vaccines give immunisation - most however do greatly reduce
Most people have now had multiple vaccines, and potentially have had
Covid-19 multiple times as well. And so with a broader level of protection, >>> it makes it harder for the virus to mutate its way around.
Lets get back to bsiscs, a vaccine is supposed to make one immune to the >>> virus and yet here we have multi jabs abd getting the disease. Safe and
effective, and get another booster.
the risk of virus infection
Not at all in relation to Covid. There do appear to be additional
So slowly the mainstream media are coming to the real world situation,
walking their narrative of 4 odd years ago back.
dangers in repeated infection with Covid, possibly especially in the
elderly and the very young.
There are other vaccines which require regular boosters to keep your
immune system ready. For example, tetanus - even if you don't get a
booster yourself, the hospital will often give you one if you have a
deep cut or operation.
On 24 Apr 2025 23:33:58 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360664802/where-has-all-covid-goneFor Rich's benefit, this is how to respond to another poster (ie
This is somewhat interesting. It is not the same old, same old but has some >>"new" points.
Gordon) in a thread.
It is rude to respond to multiple posters in a single post.
"This is attributed to the level of immunity in the community making it hard for the virus to
mutate." No metion of the vaccines affect.
"So low, in fact, they are the lowest that expert modeller Michael Plank >>has seen since Omicrons arrival in early 2022.
But low does not mean gone, and people should still be getting their >>vaccine boosters, he added."
Really, why when the evidence has shown that the the vaccines are only good >>for adding profit to the manufactuers.
Most people have now had multiple vaccines, and potentially have had >>Covid-19 multiple times as well. And so with a broader level of protection, >>it makes it harder for the virus to mutate its way around.
Lets get back to bsiscs, a vaccine is supposed to make one immune to the >>virus and yet here we have multi jabs abd getting the disease. Safe and >>effective, and get another booster.
So slowly the mainstream media are coming to the real world situation, >>walking their narrative of 4 odd years ago back.
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 15:59:23 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 12:46:36 +1200, It's A Me <its-a-me@mario.com>For your benefit Rich, this is an example of responding to you. Se my
wrote:
On 2025-04-24 23:33:58 +0000, Gordon said:The lower level of infection is certainly an effect of the levels of >>immunisation - do you have any evidence to the contrary?
https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360664802/where-has-all-covid-gone
This is somewhat interesting. It is not the same old, same old but has some
"new" points.
"This is attributed to the level of immunity in the community making it >>>> hard for the virus to
mutate." No metion of the vaccines affect.
"So low, in fact, they are the lowest that expert modeller Michael Plank >>>> has seen since Omicrons arrival in early 2022.
But low does not mean gone, and people should still be getting their
vaccine boosters, he added."
Really, why when the evidence has shown that the the vaccines are only good
for adding profit to the manufactuers.
I am not aware of any such evidence - do you have a credible reference
to any such conclusion by any reputable scientific organisation?
Very few vaccines give immunisation - most however do greatly reduce
Most people have now had multiple vaccines, and potentially have had
Covid-19 multiple times as well. And so with a broader level of protection,
it makes it harder for the virus to mutate its way around.
Lets get back to bsiscs, a vaccine is supposed to make one immune to the >>>> virus and yet here we have multi jabs abd getting the disease. Safe and >>>> effective, and get another booster.
the risk of virus infection
Not at all in relation to Covid. There do appear to be additional
So slowly the mainstream media are coming to the real world situation, >>>> walking their narrative of 4 odd years ago back.
dangers in repeated infection with Covid, possibly especially in the >>elderly and the very young.
other post for how to respond to other posters in this thread.
There are other vaccines which require regular boosters to keep your >>>immune system ready. For example, tetanus - even if you don't get a >>>booster yourself, the hospital will often give you one if you have a
deep cut or operation.
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 11:54:24 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>In which case, why have you gone off topic?
wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 15:59:23 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 12:46:36 +1200, It's A Me <its-a-me@mario.com>For your benefit Rich, this is an example of responding to you. Se my >>other post for how to respond to other posters in this thread.
wrote:
On 2025-04-24 23:33:58 +0000, Gordon said:The lower level of infection is certainly an effect of the levels of >>>immunisation - do you have any evidence to the contrary?
https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360664802/where-has-all-covid-gone
This is somewhat interesting. It is not the same old, same old but has >>>>>some
"new" points.
"This is attributed to the level of immunity in the community making it >>>>> hard for the virus to
mutate." No metion of the vaccines affect.
"So low, in fact, they are the lowest that expert modeller Michael Plank >>>>> has seen since Omicrons arrival in early 2022.
But low does not mean gone, and people should still be getting their >>>>> vaccine boosters, he added."
Really, why when the evidence has shown that the the vaccines are only >>>>>good
for adding profit to the manufactuers.
I am not aware of any such evidence - do you have a credible reference
to any such conclusion by any reputable scientific organisation?
Very few vaccines give immunisation - most however do greatly reduce
Most people have now had multiple vaccines, and potentially have had >>>>> Covid-19 multiple times as well. And so with a broader level of >>>>>protection,
it makes it harder for the virus to mutate its way around.
Lets get back to bsiscs, a vaccine is supposed to make one immune to the >>>>> virus and yet here we have multi jabs abd getting the disease. Safe and >>>>> effective, and get another booster.
the risk of virus infection
Not at all in relation to Covid. There do appear to be additional
So slowly the mainstream media are coming to the real world situation, >>>>> walking their narrative of 4 odd years ago back.
dangers in repeated infection with Covid, possibly especially in the >>>elderly and the very young.
I prefer to keep on topic, Crash
There are other vaccines which require regular boosters to keep your >>>>immune system ready. For example, tetanus - even if you don't get a >>>>booster yourself, the hospital will often give you one if you have a >>>>deep cut or operation.
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 11:57:00 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>You really are either dumb or deliberately nasty. There are no other possible explanations for your behaviour.
wrote:
On 24 Apr 2025 23:33:58 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360664802/where-has-all-covid-goneFor Rich's benefit, this is how to respond to another poster (ie
This is somewhat interesting. It is not the same old, same old but has some >>>"new" points.
Gordon) in a thread.
It is rude to respond to multiple posters in a single post.
This is a group discussion - it is a Usenet Group - understand? In
responding to a thread it is normal to address the paragraph before
your comment; it makes little difference if a response is made to
different posters within one response to other users of nz.general -
indeed it can be preferable to a multitude of minor responses to
different posts. There is no rudeness involved - just more effective
group communication.
"This is attributed to the level of immunity in the community making it hard >>>for the virus to
mutate." No metion of the vaccines affect.
"So low, in fact, they are the lowest that expert modeller Michael Plank >>>has seen since Omicrons arrival in early 2022.
But low does not mean gone, and people should still be getting their >>>vaccine boosters, he added."
Really, why when the evidence has shown that the the vaccines are only good >>>for adding profit to the manufactuers.
Most people have now had multiple vaccines, and potentially have had >>>Covid-19 multiple times as well. And so with a broader level of protection, >>>it makes it harder for the virus to mutate its way around.
Lets get back to bsiscs, a vaccine is supposed to make one immune to the >>>virus and yet here we have multi jabs abd getting the disease. Safe and >>>effective, and get another booster.
So slowly the mainstream media are coming to the real world situation, >>>walking their narrative of 4 odd years ago back.
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 11:57:00 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:
On 24 Apr 2025 23:33:58 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360664802/where-has-all-covid-goneFor Rich's benefit, this is how to respond to another poster (ie
This is somewhat interesting. It is not the same old, same old but has some >>>"new" points.
Gordon) in a thread.
It is rude to respond to multiple posters in a single post.
This is a group discussion - it is a Usenet Group - understand? In
responding to a thread it is normal to address the paragraph before
your comment; it makes little difference if a response is made to
different posters within one response to other users of nz.general -
indeed it can be preferable to a multitude of minor responses to
different posts. There is no rudeness involved - just more effective
group communication.
"This is attributed to the level of immunity in the community making it hard for the virus to
mutate." No metion of the vaccines affect.
"So low, in fact, they are the lowest that expert modeller Michael Plank >>>has seen since Omicrons arrival in early 2022.
But low does not mean gone, and people should still be getting their >>>vaccine boosters, he added."
Really, why when the evidence has shown that the the vaccines are only good >>>for adding profit to the manufactuers.
Most people have now had multiple vaccines, and potentially have had >>>Covid-19 multiple times as well. And so with a broader level of protection, >>>it makes it harder for the virus to mutate its way around.
Lets get back to bsiscs, a vaccine is supposed to make one immune to the >>>virus and yet here we have multi jabs abd getting the disease. Safe and >>>effective, and get another booster.
So slowly the mainstream media are coming to the real world situation, >>>walking their narrative of 4 odd years ago back.
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 16:21:21 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 11:57:00 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>wrote:That is not correct Rich. When you respond to a post in a newsgroup
On 24 Apr 2025 23:33:58 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360664802/where-has-all-covid-goneFor Rich's benefit, this is how to respond to another poster (ie
This is somewhat interesting. It is not the same old, same old but has some >>>>"new" points.
Gordon) in a thread.
It is rude to respond to multiple posters in a single post.
This is a group discussion - it is a Usenet Group - understand? In >>responding to a thread it is normal to address the paragraph before
your comment; it makes little difference if a response is made to
different posters within one response to other users of nz.general -
indeed it can be preferable to a multitude of minor responses to
different posts. There is no rudeness involved - just more effective
group communication.
it is a response to the previous poster. The medium is via the
newsgroup but the response is not. If you respond to me then your
response will show as a sub thread of my post. If you respond to any
other poster it should appear as likewise - a sub thread of that
poster.
You use Forte Agent as your news reader. The hierarchy of how posts
to a thread is represented is well illustrated in this thread. Other
Usenet readers observe the same threading conventions of Agent. It
has ALWAYS been this way and I have been posting yo Usenet using Agent
since 1996.
Prior to that I used a corporate app - dating back to 1990 - that was >entirely modeled on Usenet conventions - that was a proprietary >implementation on an internal only (Burroughs, later Unisys) network
of corporate mainframes (that synchronised posts twice daily, back in
the days when the implementation of a WAN was several mainframes that >established connections twice daily through dial-up networking in >pre-internet days. The architects of that app were involved in the >deployment of Arpanet (a US Defence dept predecessor to the internet)
prior to joining Burroughs/Unisys. That app was never released to
customers. They observed exactly the same concept (every response to
a single poster) and represented threads exactly as Agent does.
It is totally irrational to expect that it is OK for you to respond to
Gordon as a sub thread of a response to me.
"This is attributed to the level of immunity in the community making it hard for the virus to
mutate." No metion of the vaccines affect.
"So low, in fact, they are the lowest that expert modeller Michael Plank >>>>has seen since Omicrons arrival in early 2022.
But low does not mean gone, and people should still be getting their >>>>vaccine boosters, he added."
Really, why when the evidence has shown that the the vaccines are only good >>>>for adding profit to the manufactuers.
Most people have now had multiple vaccines, and potentially have had >>>>Covid-19 multiple times as well. And so with a broader level of protection, >>>>it makes it harder for the virus to mutate its way around.
Lets get back to bsiscs, a vaccine is supposed to make one immune to the >>>>virus and yet here we have multi jabs abd getting the disease. Safe and >>>>effective, and get another booster.
So slowly the mainstream media are coming to the real world situation, >>>>walking their narrative of 4 odd years ago back.
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 20:45:47 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>Well you are wrong and you know it. You are like a 3 year old having a tantrum about the drink you claimed you didn't spill. Did you use to blame other people when your nappy became wet?
wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 16:21:21 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 11:57:00 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>>wrote:That is not correct Rich. When you respond to a post in a newsgroup
On 24 Apr 2025 23:33:58 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360664802/where-has-all-covid-goneFor Rich's benefit, this is how to respond to another poster (ie >>>>Gordon) in a thread.
This is somewhat interesting. It is not the same old, same old but has some
"new" points.
It is rude to respond to multiple posters in a single post.
This is a group discussion - it is a Usenet Group - understand? In >>>responding to a thread it is normal to address the paragraph before
your comment; it makes little difference if a response is made to >>>different posters within one response to other users of nz.general - >>>indeed it can be preferable to a multitude of minor responses to >>>different posts. There is no rudeness involved - just more effective >>>group communication.
it is a response to the previous poster. The medium is via the
newsgroup but the response is not. If you respond to me then your
response will show as a sub thread of my post. If you respond to any
other poster it should appear as likewise - a sub thread of that
poster.
You use Forte Agent as your news reader. The hierarchy of how posts
to a thread is represented is well illustrated in this thread. Other >>Usenet readers observe the same threading conventions of Agent. It
has ALWAYS been this way and I have been posting yo Usenet using Agent >>since 1996.
Prior to that I used a corporate app - dating back to 1990 - that was >>entirely modeled on Usenet conventions - that was a proprietary >>implementation on an internal only (Burroughs, later Unisys) network
of corporate mainframes (that synchronised posts twice daily, back in
the days when the implementation of a WAN was several mainframes that >>established connections twice daily through dial-up networking in >>pre-internet days. The architects of that app were involved in the >>deployment of Arpanet (a US Defence dept predecessor to the internet)
prior to joining Burroughs/Unisys. That app was never released to >>customers. They observed exactly the same concept (every response to
a single poster) and represented threads exactly as Agent does.
It is totally irrational to expect that it is OK for you to respond to >>Gordon as a sub thread of a response to me.
There is little point in arguing with closed minds. I so not expect
any sense from Tony
, but in this case Crash you have also drifted aYou have no answer to the logic Crash has used.
long way from an update on Covid . . .
"This is attributed to the level of immunity in the community making it >>>>>hard for the virus to
mutate." No metion of the vaccines affect.
"So low, in fact, they are the lowest that expert modeller Michael Plank >>>>>has seen since Omicrons arrival in early 2022.
But low does not mean gone, and people should still be getting their >>>>>vaccine boosters, he added."
Really, why when the evidence has shown that the the vaccines are only good
for adding profit to the manufactuers.
Most people have now had multiple vaccines, and potentially have had >>>>>Covid-19 multiple times as well. And so with a broader level of >>>>>protection,
it makes it harder for the virus to mutate its way around.
Lets get back to bsiscs, a vaccine is supposed to make one immune to the >>>>>virus and yet here we have multi jabs abd getting the disease. Safe and >>>>>effective, and get another booster.
So slowly the mainstream media are coming to the real world situation, >>>>>walking their narrative of 4 odd years ago back.
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 16:21:21 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 11:57:00 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid> >>wrote:That is not correct Rich. When you respond to a post in a newsgroup
On 24 Apr 2025 23:33:58 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:
https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360664802/where-has-all-covid-goneFor Rich's benefit, this is how to respond to another poster (ie
This is somewhat interesting. It is not the same old, same old but has some >>>>"new" points.
Gordon) in a thread.
It is rude to respond to multiple posters in a single post.
This is a group discussion - it is a Usenet Group - understand? In >>responding to a thread it is normal to address the paragraph before
your comment; it makes little difference if a response is made to
different posters within one response to other users of nz.general -
indeed it can be preferable to a multitude of minor responses to
different posts. There is no rudeness involved - just more effective
group communication.
it is a response to the previous poster. The medium is via the
newsgroup but the response is not. If you respond to me then your
response will show as a sub thread of my post.
other poster it should appear as likewise - a sub thread of that
poster.
You use Forte Agent as your news reader. The hierarchy of how posts
to a thread is represented is well illustrated in this thread. Other
Usenet readers observe the same threading conventions of Agent. It
has ALWAYS been this way and I have been posting yo Usenet using Agent
since 1996.
Prior to that I used a corporate app - dating back to 1990 - that was entirely modeled on Usenet conventions - that was a proprietary implementation on an internal only (Burroughs, later Unisys) network
of corporate mainframes (that synchronised posts twice daily, back in
the days when the implementation of a WAN was several mainframes that established connections twice daily through dial-up networking in pre-internet days. The architects of that app were involved in the deployment of Arpanet (a US Defence dept predecessor to the internet)
prior to joining Burroughs/Unisys. That app was never released to
customers. They observed exactly the same concept (every response to
a single poster) and represented threads exactly as Agent does.
It is totally irrational to expect that it is OK for you to respond to
Gordon as a sub thread of a response to me.
"This is attributed to the level of immunity in the community making it hard for the virus to
mutate." No metion of the vaccines affect.
"So low, in fact, they are the lowest that expert modeller Michael Plank >>>>has seen since Omicrons arrival in early 2022.
But low does not mean gone, and people should still be getting their >>>>vaccine boosters, he added."
Really, why when the evidence has shown that the the vaccines are only good >>>>for adding profit to the manufactuers.
Most people have now had multiple vaccines, and potentially have had >>>>Covid-19 multiple times as well. And so with a broader level of protection, >>>>it makes it harder for the virus to mutate its way around.
Lets get back to bsiscs, a vaccine is supposed to make one immune to the >>>>virus and yet here we have multi jabs abd getting the disease. Safe and >>>>effective, and get another booster.
So slowly the mainstream media are coming to the real world situation, >>>>walking their narrative of 4 odd years ago back.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 499 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 52:34:19 |
| Calls: | 9,839 |
| Files: | 13,764 |
| Messages: | 6,194,388 |
| Posted today: | 1 |