• They were warned

    From Gordon@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 30 00:37:30 2025
    The topic is about Green power becoming to great a percentage of the supply.

    The power collaspe in Portugal, Spain and part of France is showing the
    world what can happen if the netork does not have the interia to balance
    change in load, or to give the operators enough time to correct the
    situation.

    The power generation was 60% by green power (wind and solar). Experts were warning that the network was likely to go down as there was not enough stability in the system. They have been proved right.

    For NZ we have 86.3% of the capacity using spinning generators and 13.7% by
    non rotating generators. Figures above are the installed capacity not necessarily the generated output.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From It's A Me@21:1/5 to Gordon on Wed Apr 30 14:08:25 2025
    On 2025-04-30 00:37:30 +0000, Gordon said:

    The topic is about Green power becoming to great a percentage of the supply.

    The power collaspe in Portugal, Spain and part of France is showing the
    world what can happen if the netork does not have the interia to balance change in load, or to give the operators enough time to correct the situation.

    The power generation was 60% by green power (wind and solar). Experts were warning that the network was likely to go down as there was not enough stability in the system. They have been proved right.

    For NZ we have 86.3% of the capacity using spinning generators and 13.7% by non rotating generators. Figures above are the installed capacity not necessarily the generated output.

    Relying solely on any form of weather-related power generation is
    simply ridiculous.

    None of these so called "green energy" options are actually good for
    the planet anyway. They all have big environmental problems.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to Gordon on Wed Apr 30 14:21:50 2025
    On 30 Apr 2025 00:37:30 GMT, Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    The topic is about Green power becoming to great a percentage of the supply.
    I understand that in some communities the vast majority of generation
    is from so-called "Green" sources - with various forms of storage such
    as retained water in hydro lakes for example, or use of passive
    buildings with lower energy requirements. I doubt there is a single
    'ideal' percentage of supply for different forms of generation; but
    what are your thoughts, Gordon?


    The power collaspe in Portugal, Spain and part of France is showing the
    world what can happen if the netork does not have the interia to balance >change in load, or to give the operators enough time to correct the >situation.
    It is not clear what the problem was with the interior? Inertia?
    relating to the system. I do not know the percentages of wind / solar
    / other for electricity generation either, or how that mix may have
    caused problems. It is possible that in some areas there is
    considerable use of DC current for some purposes; in New Zealand I
    understand that feeding to the grid is largely or perhaps even wholly
    done after inversion to AC - it is possible that for some purposes DC
    power is used directly by generators.


    The power generation was 60% by green power (wind and solar). Experts were >warning that the network was likely to go down as there was not enough >stability in the system. They have been proved right.

    For NZ we have 86.3% of the capacity using spinning generators and 13.7% by >non rotating generators. Figures above are the installed capacity not >necessarily the generated output.

    Can you explain what 'spinning' and 'non-rotating' mean in terms of
    "Green" and "non-Green" generation?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 30 16:21:44 2025
    On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:08:25 +1200, It's A Me <its-a-me@mario.com>
    wrote:

    On 2025-04-30 00:37:30 +0000, Gordon said:

    The topic is about Green power becoming to great a percentage of the supply. >>
    The power collaspe in Portugal, Spain and part of France is showing the
    world what can happen if the netork does not have the interia to balance
    change in load, or to give the operators enough time to correct the
    situation.

    The power generation was 60% by green power (wind and solar). Experts were >> warning that the network was likely to go down as there was not enough
    stability in the system. They have been proved right.

    For NZ we have 86.3% of the capacity using spinning generators and 13.7% by >> non rotating generators. Figures above are the installed capacity not
    necessarily the generated output.

    Relying solely on any form of weather-related power generation is
    simply ridiculous.
    Hydro is probably the largest source of electricity generation in New
    Zealand - we know that there are problems when there are extended
    periods with low rainfall, but how is relying on hydro generation for
    part of our overall electricity needs ridiculous, It's A Me?


    None of these so called "green energy" options are actually good for
    the planet anyway. They all have big environmental problems.
    How is Hydro generation bad for the planet? And Wind turbines?




    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From It's A Me@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 30 18:25:47 2025
    On 2025-04-30 04:21:44 +0000, Rich80105 said:
    On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:08:25 +1200, It's A Me <its-a-me@mario.com>
    wrote:
    On 2025-04-30 00:37:30 +0000, Gordon said:

    The topic is about Green power becoming to great a percentage of the supply.

    The power collaspe in Portugal, Spain and part of France is showing the
    world what can happen if the netork does not have the interia to balance >>> change in load, or to give the operators enough time to correct the
    situation.

    The power generation was 60% by green power (wind and solar). Experts were >>> warning that the network was likely to go down as there was not enough
    stability in the system. They have been proved right.

    For NZ we have 86.3% of the capacity using spinning generators and
    13.7% by non rotating generators. Figures above are the installed
    capacity not
    necessarily the generated output.

    Relying solely on any form of weather-related power generation is
    simply ridiculous.

    Hydro is probably the largest source of electricity generation in New
    Zealand - we know that there are problems when there are extended
    periods with low rainfall, but how is relying on hydro generation for
    part of our overall electricity needs ridiculous, It's A Me?

    As I said ... relying *SOLELY* on any form of weather-related power
    generation is ridiculous.



    None of these so called "green energy" options are actually good for
    the planet anyway. They all have big environmental problems.

    How is Hydro generation bad for the planet?

    Depends on how the water obtained, gets used, and what happens to it afterwards. For example, flooding a large area of land for a hydro dam
    is obvioulsy bad for that environment.



    And Wind turbines?

    Not only do they look hideous, but building them it remote areas
    usually destroys that environment, plus building the blades and
    disposing of them is highly polluting.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tony@21:1/5 to It's A Me on Wed Apr 30 07:09:46 2025
    It's A Me <its-a-me@mario.com> wrote:
    On 2025-04-30 04:21:44 +0000, Rich80105 said:
    On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:08:25 +1200, It's A Me <its-a-me@mario.com>
    wrote:
    On 2025-04-30 00:37:30 +0000, Gordon said:

    The topic is about Green power becoming to great a percentage of the >>>>supply.

    The power collaspe in Portugal, Spain and part of France is showing the >>>> world what can happen if the netork does not have the interia to balance >>>> change in load, or to give the operators enough time to correct the
    situation.

    The power generation was 60% by green power (wind and solar). Experts were >>>> warning that the network was likely to go down as there was not enough >>>> stability in the system. They have been proved right.

    For NZ we have 86.3% of the capacity using spinning generators and
    13.7% by non rotating generators. Figures above are the installed
    capacity not
    necessarily the generated output.

    Relying solely on any form of weather-related power generation is
    simply ridiculous.

    Hydro is probably the largest source of electricity generation in New
    Zealand - we know that there are problems when there are extended
    periods with low rainfall, but how is relying on hydro generation for
    part of our overall electricity needs ridiculous, It's A Me?

    As I said ... relying *SOLELY* on any form of weather-related power >generation is ridiculous.



    None of these so called "green energy" options are actually good for
    the planet anyway. They all have big environmental problems.

    How is Hydro generation bad for the planet?

    Depends on how the water obtained, gets used, and what happens to it >afterwards. For example, flooding a large area of land for a hydro dam
    is obvioulsy bad for that environment.



    And Wind turbines?

    Not only do they look hideous, but building them it remote areas
    usually destroys that environment, plus building the blades and
    disposing of them is highly polluting.
    And they kill birds.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From It's A Me@21:1/5 to Tony on Wed Apr 30 19:31:52 2025
    On 2025-04-30 07:09:46 +0000, Tony said:
    It's A Me <its-a-me@mario.com> wrote:
    On 2025-04-30 04:21:44 +0000, Rich80105 said:
    On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:08:25 +1200, It's A Me <its-a-me@mario.com>
    wrote:
    On 2025-04-30 00:37:30 +0000, Gordon said:

    The topic is about Green power becoming to great a percentage of the >>>>> supply.

    The power collaspe in Portugal, Spain and part of France is showing the >>>>> world what can happen if the netork does not have the interia to
    balance change in load, or to give the operators enough time to correct >>>>> the situation.

    The power generation was 60% by green power (wind and solar). Experts >>>>> were warning that the network was likely to go down as there was not >>>>> enough stability in the system. They have been proved right.

    For NZ we have 86.3% of the capacity using spinning generators and
    13.7% by non rotating generators. Figures above are the installed
    capacity not necessarily the generated output.

    Relying solely on any form of weather-related power generation is
    simply ridiculous.

    Hydro is probably the largest source of electricity generation in New
    Zealand - we know that there are problems when there are extended
    periods with low rainfall, but how is relying on hydro generation for
    part of our overall electricity needs ridiculous, It's A Me?

    As I said ... relying *SOLELY* on any form of weather-related power
    generation is ridiculous.



    None of these so called "green energy" options are actually good for
    the planet anyway. They all have big environmental problems.

    How is Hydro generation bad for the planet?

    Depends on how the water obtained, gets used, and what happens to it
    afterwards. For example, flooding a large area of land for a hydro dam
    is obvioulsy bad for that environment.



    And Wind turbines?

    Not only do they look hideous, but building them it remote areas
    usually destroys that environment, plus building the blades and
    disposing of them is highly polluting.

    And they kill birds.

    Sometimes. So also do planes, cars, building windows, idiots with guns, ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BR@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 1 04:57:19 2025
    On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 16:21:44 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:08:25 +1200, It's A Me <its-a-me@mario.com>
    wrote:

    On 2025-04-30 00:37:30 +0000, Gordon said:

    The topic is about Green power becoming to great a percentage of the supply.

    The power collaspe in Portugal, Spain and part of France is showing the
    world what can happen if the netork does not have the interia to balance >>> change in load, or to give the operators enough time to correct the
    situation.

    The power generation was 60% by green power (wind and solar). Experts were >>> warning that the network was likely to go down as there was not enough
    stability in the system. They have been proved right.

    For NZ we have 86.3% of the capacity using spinning generators and 13.7% by >>> non rotating generators. Figures above are the installed capacity not
    necessarily the generated output.

    Relying solely on any form of weather-related power generation is
    simply ridiculous.
    Hydro is probably the largest source of electricity generation in New
    Zealand - we know that there are problems when there are extended
    periods with low rainfall, but how is relying on hydro generation for
    part of our overall electricity needs ridiculous, It's A Me?


    None of these so called "green energy" options are actually good for
    the planet anyway. They all have big environmental problems.
    How is Hydro generation bad for the planet? And Wind turbines?



    The only thing that matters in all of this is the cheapest and most
    reliable supply.

    If that means burning coal then ignore the climate con-men and burn
    it.

    Bill.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich80105@21:1/5 to blah@blah.blah on Thu May 1 09:21:20 2025
    On Thu, 01 May 2025 04:57:19 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:

    On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 16:21:44 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:08:25 +1200, It's A Me <its-a-me@mario.com>
    wrote:

    On 2025-04-30 00:37:30 +0000, Gordon said:

    The topic is about Green power becoming to great a percentage of the supply.

    The power collaspe in Portugal, Spain and part of France is showing the >>>> world what can happen if the netork does not have the interia to balance >>>> change in load, or to give the operators enough time to correct the
    situation.

    The power generation was 60% by green power (wind and solar). Experts were >>>> warning that the network was likely to go down as there was not enough >>>> stability in the system. They have been proved right.

    For NZ we have 86.3% of the capacity using spinning generators and 13.7% by
    non rotating generators. Figures above are the installed capacity not
    necessarily the generated output.

    Relying solely on any form of weather-related power generation is
    simply ridiculous.
    Hydro is probably the largest source of electricity generation in New >>Zealand - we know that there are problems when there are extended
    periods with low rainfall, but how is relying on hydro generation for
    part of our overall electricity needs ridiculous, It's A Me?


    None of these so called "green energy" options are actually good for
    the planet anyway. They all have big environmental problems.
    How is Hydro generation bad for the planet? And Wind turbines?



    The only thing that matters in all of this is the cheapest and most
    reliable supply.

    If that means burning coal then ignore the climate con-men and burn
    it.

    Bill.

    Indeed that is exactly what is happening, Bill, and it helps to keep
    our electricity prices high. The large generating companies know that
    every time Huntly is fired up due to low water levels from hydro, and insufficient wind or solar power, it increases the spot price for
    electricity substantially, delivering a spike in electricity prices
    that enhances profit for all the cartel members. The new solar farm
    will help avoid at least some of those spikes, but don't expect any
    big drop in your electricity bill . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From It's A Me@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 1 09:52:54 2025
    On 2025-04-30 21:21:20 +0000, Rich80105 said:
    On Thu, 01 May 2025 04:57:19 +1200, BR <blah@blah.blah> wrote:
    On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 16:21:44 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
    wrote:
    On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:08:25 +1200, It's A Me <its-a-me@mario.com>
    wrote:
    On 2025-04-30 00:37:30 +0000, Gordon said:

    The topic is about Green power becoming to great a percentage of the supply.

    The power collaspe in Portugal, Spain and part of France is showing the >>>>> world what can happen if the netork does not have the interia to
    balance change in load, or to give the operators enough time to correct >>>>> the situation.

    The power generation was 60% by green power (wind and solar). Experts >>>>> were warning that the network was likely to go down as there was not >>>>> enough stability in the system. They have been proved right.

    For NZ we have 86.3% of the capacity using spinning generators and
    13.7% by non rotating generators. Figures above are the installed
    capacity not necessarily the generated output.

    Relying solely on any form of weather-related power generation is
    simply ridiculous.

    Hydro is probably the largest source of electricity generation in New
    Zealand - we know that there are problems when there are extended
    periods with low rainfall, but how is relying on hydro generation for
    part of our overall electricity needs ridiculous, It's A Me?

    None of these so called "green energy" options are actually good for
    the planet anyway. They all have big environmental problems.

    How is Hydro generation bad for the planet? And Wind turbines?

    The only thing that matters in all of this is the cheapest and most
    reliable supply.

    If that means burning coal then ignore the climate con-men and burn
    it.

    Bill.

    Indeed that is exactly what is happening, Bill, and it helps to keep
    our electricity prices high. The large generating companies know that
    every time Huntly is fired up due to low water levels from hydro, and insufficient wind or solar power, it increases the spot price for
    electricity substantially, delivering a spike in electricity prices
    that enhances profit for all the cartel members. The new solar farm
    will help avoid at least some of those spikes, but don't expect any
    big drop in your electricity bill . . .

    The "new solar farm" is pretty much useless (as solar panels always
    are), as well as a massively ugly blot on the landscape. 90,000 solar
    panels to power less than 13,000 homes, not even remotely worth the
    effort and cost.

    Thankfully someone with a brain stopped the equally useless and ugly
    wind farm proposal.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)