This clarifies a few issues, such as confirming that the haka is notIt muddies the waters, quite deliberately. It is opinion and not supported by fact.
intended to intimidate, setting hearing times when all are available
is included in standing orders but ignored by the Committee.
It also links the haka to the extremely offensive Bill that was, inWhich is simply a lie.
the view of many New Zealanders, "the most divisive, racist piece of >legislation that has ever been introduced during our lifetimes".
https://www.rnz.co.nz/programmes/mata-with-mihingarangi-forbes/story/2018991002/mata-season-3-episode-11-tania-waikato
This clarifies a few issues, such as confirming that the haka is not
intended to intimidate,
setting hearing times when all are available
is included in standing orders but ignored by the Committee.
It also links the haka to the extremely offensive Bill that was, in
the view of many New Zealanders, "the most divisive, racist piece of >legislation that has ever been introduced during our lifetimes".
On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 21:38:53 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com>
wrote:
https://www.rnz.co.nz/programmes/mata-with-mihingarangi-forbes/story/2018991002/mata-season-3-episode-11-tania-waikato
This clarifies a few issues, such as confirming that the haka is not >>intended to intimidate,
Performed in the floor of Parliament by those that opposed the treaty >Principles Bill and confronting the Bill's sponsor. The performance
was angry and aggressive.
Next you will be claiming that the Haka performed by the All Blacks
before every game they play - which is a general performance clearly
aimed at the opposing team (not any individual) - is simply a welcome
to their opponents.
Jeez Rich you post irrational rubbish sometimes.
setting hearing times when all are availableCan you cite to support this? It may be true in respect of committee
is included in standing orders but ignored by the Committee.
members but I don't think it is true of MPs referred to the Privileges >Committee.
It also links the haka to the extremely offensive Bill that was, in
the view of many New Zealanders, "the most divisive, racist piece of >>legislation that has ever been introduced during our lifetimes".
The issue is the Haka - where it was performed and the circumstances >applicable. Why it was performed is not relevant.
On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 11:55:27 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>All of which ignores the real issue. Disrespecting all New Zealanders - because that is what they did.
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 21:38:53 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
https://www.rnz.co.nz/programmes/mata-with-mihingarangi-forbes/story/2018991002/mata-season-3-episode-11-tania-waikato
This clarifies a few issues, such as confirming that the haka is not >>>intended to intimidate,
Performed in the floor of Parliament by those that opposed the treaty >>Principles Bill and confronting the Bill's sponsor. The performance
was angry and aggressive.
Next you will be claiming that the Haka performed by the All Blacks
before every game they play - which is a general performance clearly
aimed at the opposing team (not any individual) - is simply a welcome
to their opponents.
Jeez Rich you post irrational rubbish sometimes.
setting hearing times when all are availableCan you cite to support this? It may be true in respect of committee >>members but I don't think it is true of MPs referred to the Privileges >>Committee.
is included in standing orders but ignored by the Committee.
From the article cited above: "Requests to the committee to have a
hearing at a time when both counsels were available and for the
accused to bring evidence to defend themselves against the allegations
were rejected even though that was provided for in the standing
orders, she said."
It also links the haka to the extremely offensive Bill that was, in
the view of many New Zealanders, "the most divisive, racist piece of >>>legislation that has ever been introduced during our lifetimes".
The issue is the Haka - where it was performed and the circumstances >>applicable. Why it was performed is not relevant.
The circumstances applicable to the Maori party are the reason why it
was performed.
On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 11:55:27 +1200, Crash <nogood@dontbother.invalid>
wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 21:38:53 +1200, Rich80105 <Rich80105@hotmail.com> >>wrote:
https://www.rnz.co.nz/programmes/mata-with-mihingarangi-forbes/story/2018991002/mata-season-3-episode-11-tania-waikato
This clarifies a few issues, such as confirming that the haka is not >>>intended to intimidate,
Performed in the floor of Parliament by those that opposed the treaty >>Principles Bill and confronting the Bill's sponsor. The performance
was angry and aggressive.
Next you will be claiming that the Haka performed by the All Blacks
before every game they play - which is a general performance clearly
aimed at the opposing team (not any individual) - is simply a welcome
to their opponents.
Jeez Rich you post irrational rubbish sometimes.
setting hearing times when all are availableCan you cite to support this? It may be true in respect of committee >>members but I don't think it is true of MPs referred to the Privileges >>Committee.
is included in standing orders but ignored by the Committee.
From the article cited above: "Requests to the committee to have a
hearing at a time when both counsels were available and for the
accused to bring evidence to defend themselves against the allegations
were rejected even though that was provided for in the standing
orders, she said."
It also links the haka to the extremely offensive Bill that was, in
the view of many New Zealanders, "the most divisive, racist piece of >>>legislation that has ever been introduced during our lifetimes".
The issue is the Haka - where it was performed and the circumstances >>applicable. Why it was performed is not relevant.
The circumstances applicable to the Maori party are the reason why it
was performed.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 499 |
| Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
| Uptime: | 49:45:08 |
| Calls: | 9,837 |
| Calls today: | 7 |
| Files: | 13,764 |
| Messages: | 6,194,128 |