• Tonight's movie

    From Keith F. Lynch@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 3 03:26:03 2025
    When my brother went to the TV to select a movie for us to watch this
    evening, I told him that I knew what movie he was going to choose, and
    I jokingly told him that we had watched it last night and the night
    before and the night before that, etc., and I didn't want to watch it
    yet again.
    --
    Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
    Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gary McGath@21:1/5 to Keith F. Lynch on Mon Feb 3 06:28:55 2025
    On 2/2/25 10:26 PM, Keith F. Lynch wrote:
    When my brother went to the TV to select a movie for us to watch this evening, I told him that I knew what movie he was going to choose, and
    I jokingly told him that we had watched it last night and the night
    before and the night before that, etc., and I didn't want to watch it
    yet again.

    Were you right about which one he chose?

    --
    Gary McGath http://www.mcgath.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Keith F. Lynch@21:1/5 to Gary McGath on Mon Feb 3 16:09:20 2025
    Gary McGath <garym@mcgath.com> wrote:
    Keith F. Lynch wrote:
    When my brother went to the TV to select a movie for us to watch
    this evening, I told him that I knew what movie he was going to
    choose, and I jokingly told him that we had watched it last night
    and the night before and the night before that, etc., and I didn't
    want to watch it yet again.

    Were you right about which one he chose?

    I never found out his intentions. We ended up mostly watching YouTube
    videos. (Not the same ones we had watched the previous evening.)
    --
    Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
    Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Keith F. Lynch@21:1/5 to Keith F. Lynch on Mon Feb 3 16:14:41 2025
    Keith F. Lynch <kfl@KeithLynch.net> wrote:
    We ended up mostly watching YouTube videos.

    Most notably, a new Lehto's Law video that shocked even me. And I
    thought I was unshockable. It's about a man who was compelled to
    plead guilty to stealing his own identity. He had to falsely confess
    that he wasn't who he claimed to be. (He was eventually exonerated.)
    --
    Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
    Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gary McGath@21:1/5 to Cryptoengineer on Wed Feb 5 08:40:15 2025
    On 2/5/25 8:31 AM, Cryptoengineer wrote:
    On 2/3/2025 11:14 AM, Keith F. Lynch wrote:
    Keith F. Lynch <kfl@KeithLynch.net> wrote:
    We ended up mostly watching YouTube videos.

    Most notably, a new Lehto's Law video that shocked even me.  And I
    thought I was unshockable.  It's about a man who was compelled to
    plead guilty to stealing his own identity.  He had to falsely confess
    that he wasn't who he claimed to be.  (He was eventually exonerated.)

    Lehto's Law is a channel that demonstrates something I hate about
    YouTube.

    It has interesting content, but the 'video' angle has exactly zero
    added value - its just him sitting in his office talking at the
    camera.

    You spend 10-40 minutes for a story you could have read in 5 minutes.

    No wonder I watch it at 1.5x to 1.75x speed, and still feel he's
    wasting my time.

    pt

    I watched a Lehto's Law video with a friend yesterday, about the
    challenge to a Louisiana law that says cops can order people to stay 25
    feet away from them. I'd already known a lot of what was in it. The main benefit was that I got my friend to see it.

    I think videos are popular because many people use phones for computers,
    and it's a pain to read much text on them.
    --
    Gary McGath http://www.mcgath.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Keith F. Lynch@21:1/5 to Gary McGath on Wed Feb 5 18:09:10 2025
    Gary McGath <garym@mcgath.com> wrote:
    Cryptoengineer wrote:
    No wonder I watch it at 1.5x to 1.75x speed, and still feel he's
    wasting my time.

    I always watch it at 2x speed, since he speaks clearly and has good microphones. I'd try for 3x if my computer let me.

    I watched a Lehto's Law video with a friend yesterday, about the
    challenge to a Louisiana law that says cops can order people to stay
    25 feet away from them. I'd already known a lot of what was in it.
    The main benefit was that I got my friend to see it.

    As I implied, I often watch them with my brother.

    Watching videos is often a social event. Reading is almost always a
    solo event. There is room for both.

    I noticed that lots of episodes of Bewitched and I Dream of Jeannie
    can be viewed for free on YouTube. I recognized Billy Mumy ("Will
    Robinson") in one episode of each series. That kid really got around.
    Hard to believe he's in his 70s now. And that the principal characters
    of Bewitched (Samantha and both Darrens) died when they were younger
    than I am now. At least Barbara Eden is still with us.
    --
    Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
    Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Keith F. Lynch@21:1/5 to All on Wed Feb 5 18:26:03 2025
    Another reason for me to watch Lehto's Law is because Chessiecon/TSFS
    voted to send him a shirt. So far he hasn't worn it on air. But I at
    least glance at all of his videos (except the livestreams, for which
    he doesn't wear donated shirts, and in which he mostly talks about
    cars rather than about law) to see if he's wearing it.
    --
    Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
    Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Keith F. Lynch@21:1/5 to Keith F. Lynch on Wed Feb 5 22:53:07 2025
    Keith F. Lynch <kfl@KeithLynch.net> wrote:
    I noticed that lots of episodes of Bewitched and I Dream of Jeannie
    can be viewed for free on YouTube. I recognized Billy Mumy ("Will
    Robinson") in one episode of each series. That kid really got
    around. Hard to believe he's in his 70s now. And that the
    principal characters of Bewitched (Samantha and both Darrens) died
    when they were younger than I am now. At least Barbara Eden is
    still with us.

    And, switching to the other pair of 1960s competing fantasy sitcoms,
    The Addams Family and The Munsters, can you believe that the original Wednesday, Lisa Loring, is in her 50s?

    If so, you're mistaken. She's dead, as is the boy who played
    Pugsley. It's her *daughter* who is in her 50s.
    --
    Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
    Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lowell Gilbert@21:1/5 to Keith F. Lynch on Thu Feb 6 20:24:47 2025
    "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@KeithLynch.net> writes:

    And, switching to the other pair of 1960s competing fantasy sitcoms,
    The Addams Family and The Munsters, can you believe that the original Wednesday, Lisa Loring, is in her 50s?

    If so, you're mistaken. She's dead, as is the boy who played
    Pugsley. It's her *daughter* who is in her 50s.

    Sounds right to me. I doubt I ever saw a television
    set until after the show's run.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gary McGath@21:1/5 to Keith F. Lynch on Fri Feb 7 05:06:58 2025
    On 2/5/25 1:09 PM, Keith F. Lynch wrote:
    Gary McGath <garym@mcgath.com> wrote:
    Cryptoengineer wrote:
    No wonder I watch it at 1.5x to 1.75x speed, and still feel he's
    wasting my time.

    I always watch it at 2x speed, since he speaks clearly and has good microphones. I'd try for 3x if my computer let me.

    I watched a Lehto's Law video with a friend yesterday, about the
    challenge to a Louisiana law that says cops can order people to stay
    25 feet away from them. I'd already known a lot of what was in it.
    The main benefit was that I got my friend to see it.

    As I implied, I often watch them with my brother.

    Watching videos is often a social event. Reading is almost always a
    solo event. There is room for both.


    A big problem with videos as opposed to text is that it's harder to
    watch critically than to read critically. When you read something, you
    can slow down for key points and leave the text to check it for
    something else. With video, it's easier to passively absorb what the
    speaker is saying without giving it careful attention. Often videos add
    images to strengthen their points, but the images may not be
    photographic evidence of what actually happened, or they may be
    carefully cut to give a desired impression. I think dependence on videos
    is a major cause of tribalist thinking.

    --
    Gary McGath http://www.mcgath.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul Dormer@21:1/5 to Lowell Gilbert on Fri Feb 7 11:09:00 2025
    In article <44bjvefsww.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>, lgusenet@be-well.ilk.org
    (Lowell Gilbert) wrote:


    Sounds right to me. I doubt I ever saw a television
    set until after the show's run.

    I have memories of watching it in the sixties - one of those shows that
    you talked about to your school friends the next day - but I can't
    remember exactly when it was shown. In those days, it wasn't unusual to
    wait years for a US show to cross the Atlantic. For instance, I read
    newspaper reports about this popular show Star Trek, but the BBC didn't
    show it till after all three seasons had finished in the US.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Merrigan@21:1/5 to Gary McGath on Fri Feb 7 12:04:59 2025
    On 2/5/2025 5:40 AM, Gary McGath wrote:
    On 2/5/25 8:31 AM, Cryptoengineer wrote:
    On 2/3/2025 11:14 AM, Keith F. Lynch wrote:
    Keith F. Lynch <kfl@KeithLynch.net> wrote:
    We ended up mostly watching YouTube videos.

    Most notably, a new Lehto's Law video that shocked even me.  And I
    thought I was unshockable.  It's about a man who was compelled to
    plead guilty to stealing his own identity.  He had to falsely confess
    that he wasn't who he claimed to be.  (He was eventually exonerated.)

    Lehto's Law is a channel that demonstrates something I hate about
    YouTube.

    It has interesting content, but the 'video' angle has exactly zero
    added value - its just him sitting in his office talking at the
    camera.

    You spend 10-40 minutes for a story you could have read in 5 minutes.

    No wonder I watch it at 1.5x to 1.75x speed, and still feel he's
    wasting my time.

    pt

    I watched a Lehto's Law video with a friend yesterday, about the
    challenge to a Louisiana law that says cops can order people to stay 25
    feet away from them. I'd already known a lot of what was in it. The main benefit was that I got my friend to see it.

    I think videos are popular because many people use phones for computers,
    and it's a pain to read much text on them.

    Have they never heard of audio only? If the video doesn't add anything,
    why have it?

    --

    Qualified immunity = virtual impunity.

    Tim Merrigan

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Keith F. Lynch@21:1/5 to Gary McGath on Sun Feb 9 20:51:31 2025
    Gary McGath <garym@mcgath.com> wrote:
    A big problem with videos as opposed to text is that it's harder to
    watch critically than to read critically. When you read something,
    you can slow down for key points and leave the text to check it for
    something else.

    The same is true of video now. My browser (Firefox on Ubuntu) lets me
    pause, backtrack, or vary speed. I frequently do so.

    But I need a new ad blocker. YouTube has suddenly become all but
    unwatchable, with multiple unskippable ads breaking into videos in
    the middle. Any recommendations? Thanks.

    Last night's movie, selected by my brother, was Zulu, a 62-year-old
    movie about a then 84-year-old battle. In other words, about an event
    about three times longer ago than my false arrest. (Why yes, it is
    all about me.)

    I checked to see if any survivors of that battle lived to see the
    movie. No. Interestingly, the last one died the day after Germany
    surrendered in 1945.
    --
    Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
    Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gary McGath@21:1/5 to Keith F. Lynch on Mon Feb 10 10:37:08 2025
    On 2/9/25 3:51 PM, Keith F. Lynch wrote:
    Gary McGath <garym@mcgath.com> wrote:
    A big problem with videos as opposed to text is that it's harder to
    watch critically than to read critically. When you read something,
    you can slow down for key points and leave the text to check it for
    something else.

    The same is true of video now. My browser (Firefox on Ubuntu) lets me
    pause, backtrack, or vary speed. I frequently do so.

    It's still harder. With printed or displayed text, I can check a passage
    over till I understand it. I can sort of do the equivalent by replaying
    a section repeatedly while slowing it down and perhaps enabling
    captions, but it's awkward. It's impossible to put two videos side by
    side such that I can look from one to the other in a useful way. Pasting
    quoted passages is also harder.

    However, I often play German-language videos at a slowed-down rate to
    help my comprehension.


    But I need a new ad blocker. YouTube has suddenly become all but unwatchable, with multiple unskippable ads breaking into videos in
    the middle. Any recommendations? Thanks.

    uBlock Origin works very well for me.

    Last night's movie, selected by my brother, was Zulu, a 62-year-old
    movie about a then 84-year-old battle. In other words, about an event
    about three times longer ago than my false arrest. (Why yes, it is
    all about me.)

    I've never seen the movie, but I once had a board wargame of the same
    title, about the same military actions.



    --
    Gary McGath http://www.mcgath.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Keith F. Lynch@21:1/5 to Gary McGath on Thu Feb 13 02:44:14 2025
    Gary McGath <garym@mcgath.com> wrote:
    Keith F. Lynch wrote:
    But I need a new ad blocker. YouTube has suddenly become all but
    unwatchable, with multiple unskippable ads breaking into videos in
    the middle. Any recommendations? Thanks.

    uBlock Origin works very well for me.

    magardner2010 <magardner2010@gmail.com> wrote:
    personally, I am not having any issues with uBlock Origin, and I've
    been using it for a few years at this point.

    Thanks! YouTube is watchable again.

    I'm not too fond of ads. Especially irrelevant, repetitive, intrusive unskippable ads. Since I never buy anything based on ads, they're
    wasted on me.

    I see that one of you (Gary) commented elsewhere on new Jeeps
    subjecting owners to ads at every stop.
    --
    Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
    Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)