A British tribunal made a bizarre ruling on a proposed deportation of an Albanian man and his family: they decided against deportation because
the man's son doesn't like European chicken nuggets and will only eat
British chicken nuggets. The tribunal apparently thought it would be
beyond cruel to make this kid eat non-British nuggets!
Both Leo Kearse and the BlackBeltBarrister have made videos on this case expressing their astonishment:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnXDsozZawM [7 minutes] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1C0ByXGs2w [10 minutes]
On 2/13/2025 11:54 AM, Rhino wrote:
A British tribunal made a bizarre ruling on a proposed deportation of
an Albanian man and his family: they decided against deportation
because the man's son doesn't like European chicken nuggets and will
only eat British chicken nuggets. The tribunal apparently thought it
would be beyond cruel to make this kid eat non-British nuggets!
Both Leo Kearse and the BlackBeltBarrister have made videos on this
case expressing their astonishment:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnXDsozZawM [7 minutes]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1C0ByXGs2w [10 minutes]
What are the chances that a lot more (i.e., more convincing) evidence of expected hardship was introduced ...of which "chicken nuggets" was just
an incidental mention during extensive testimony? Any?
On 2025-02-13 12:44 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 2/13/2025 11:54 AM, Rhino wrote:Watch the second video and try to find ANY further grounds for
A British tribunal made a bizarre ruling on a proposed deportation of
an Albanian man and his family: they decided against deportation
because the man's son doesn't like European chicken nuggets and will
only eat British chicken nuggets. The tribunal apparently thought it
would be beyond cruel to make this kid eat non-British nuggets!
Both Leo Kearse and the BlackBeltBarrister have made videos on this
case expressing their astonishment:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnXDsozZawM [7 minutes]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1C0ByXGs2w [10 minutes]
What are the chances that a lot more (i.e., more convincing) evidence
of expected hardship was introduced ...of which "chicken nuggets" was
just an incidental mention during extensive testimony? Any?
preventing deportation. The presenter of that video is a practising
lawyer and seems shocked at the ruling.
On 2/13/2025 3:08 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-02-13 12:44 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 2/13/2025 11:54 AM, Rhino wrote:Watch the second video and try to find ANY further grounds for
A British tribunal made a bizarre ruling on a proposed deportation
of an Albanian man and his family: they decided against deportation
because the man's son doesn't like European chicken nuggets and will
only eat British chicken nuggets. The tribunal apparently thought it
would be beyond cruel to make this kid eat non-British nuggets!
Both Leo Kearse and the BlackBeltBarrister have made videos on this
case expressing their astonishment:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnXDsozZawM [7 minutes]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1C0ByXGs2w [10 minutes]
What are the chances that a lot more (i.e., more convincing) evidence
of expected hardship was introduced ...of which "chicken nuggets" was
just an incidental mention during extensive testimony? Any?
preventing deportation. The presenter of that video is a practising
lawyer and seems shocked at the ruling.
Even as the on-screen document (4:30) is referring to "chicken nuggets"
as an *example*, your commentator is calling them a *principle*.
("...that was the only principle upon which this decision turned.")
That's a willful misrepresentation, as it quite clearly is just the only example given of a much broader and more palatable *principle*. Decide
for yourself whether that's deceptive ...i.e., whether we should suspect
(as I do) that other examples were offered in court, though someone
chose to include only one in the report. Note also the abundance of evidence offered that the kid in question is 'special needs' ...which,
if true, is by itself a near-guarantee of a separation's harshness.
On 2025-02-13 5:11 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 2/13/2025 3:08 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-02-13 12:44 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 2/13/2025 11:54 AM, Rhino wrote:Watch the second video and try to find ANY further grounds for
A British tribunal made a bizarre ruling on a proposed deportation
of an Albanian man and his family: they decided against deportation
because the man's son doesn't like European chicken nuggets and
will only eat British chicken nuggets. The tribunal apparently
thought it would be beyond cruel to make this kid eat non-British
nuggets!
Both Leo Kearse and the BlackBeltBarrister have made videos on this
case expressing their astonishment:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnXDsozZawM [7 minutes]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1C0ByXGs2w [10 minutes]
What are the chances that a lot more (i.e., more convincing)
evidence of expected hardship was introduced ...of which "chicken
nuggets" was just an incidental mention during extensive testimony?
Any?
preventing deportation. The presenter of that video is a practising
lawyer and seems shocked at the ruling.
Even as the on-screen document (4:30) is referring to "chicken
nuggets" as an *example*, your commentator is calling them a
*principle*. ("...that was the only principle upon which this decision
turned.") That's a willful misrepresentation, as it quite clearly is
just the only example given of a much broader and more palatable
*principle*. Decide for yourself whether that's deceptive ...i.e.,
whether we should suspect (as I do) that other examples were offered
in court, though someone chose to include only one in the report.
Note also the abundance of evidence offered that the kid in question
is 'special needs' ...which, if true, is by itself a near-guarantee of
a separation's harshness.
You want there to be additional reasons for stopping the deportation so
you just read into the presentation whatever reasons YOU need to satisfy yourself that stopping the deportation was the right thing to do.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 33:33:42 |
| Calls: | 10,391 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,064 |
| Messages: | 6,417,129 |