XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism

Why, in his own words, Hegseth is an unqualified candidate for secretary of Defense
by Maj. Gen. (ret.) Dennis Laich, opinion contributor


The nomination of Peter Hegseth as secretary of Defense represents a clear
and present danger to America’s national security.

He does not possess the leadership or management experience to successfully manage a workforce of 2.9 million people and a more than $800 billion
budget. He has expressed alarmingly poor judgment across a broad range of policy and political issues. Finally, he has demonstrated a number of moral failures in his personal life.


The U.S. military operates at four levels: tactical, operational, strategic
and geopolitical. All of his military experience is as a part-time National Guard officer, solely at the tactical level. I applaud him for his service,
but the gap between the tactical and the geopolitical level is too great to close through on-the-job training. Nor does his service as a television commentator does not qualify an individual to serve as secretary of
Defense.

Beyond his professional inexperience, I have found that his own commentary solidifies his lack of qualification for the position. As expressed through numerous interviews and his own book, there are a plethora of examples that represent what I believe to be politically poor and divisive judgment.

In his book “American Crusade: Our Fight to Stay Free,” he said he believes there are “irreconcilable differences between the left and the right in
America leading to perpetual conflict that cannot be resolved through the political process.” He called for an “American Crusade,” which he described
as “a holy war for the righteous cause of human freedom.” He also said in
May 2024, “Democracy, democracy, defend the democracy. Do you know what our founders did not want us to be? A democracy.” He added that he supports gerrymandering to “screw Democrats.”

Back in 2018, Hegseth said that if the Democrats won the 2020 elections,
there would be a “national divorce,” that “The military and police … will
be forced to make a choice,” and that “yes, there will be some form of
civil war.” He also stated that conservatives must “mock, humiliate, intimidate, and crush our leftist opponents” to deal with a left that he equates with “sedition.” He claims his book “lays out the strategy we must employ in order to defeat America’s internal enemies.”


Up Next - The Hill's Headlines - February 18, 2025



This rhetoric is divisive, dangerous and should be considered
disqualifying.

Hegseth’s poor judgment extends further, into military policy specifically. When Hegseth was the chief executive for Concerned Veterans for America, an advocacy group funded by the Koch brothers, the group advocated for greater privatization of the Department of Veterans Affairs — a move that veterans
and veterans organizations vigorously objected to.


In mid-2019, while serving as a commentator on Fox News, Hegseth urged
Donald Trump to pardon soldiers convicted of war crimes in Iraq, without disclosing to his audience that he had advised Trump to pardon them. He
thus demonstrated contempt for a bedrock of U.S. military ethos, the
Uniformed Code of Military Justice. He has also vehemently defended the
January 6 rioters, labeling them patriots who had been “re-awoken to the reality of what the left has done” to the country. Storming the Capitol to overturn an election is a treasonous act; to laud it as patriotic is
certainly misguided.

Hegseth stated baldly that he wants to fire Gen. Charles Q. Brown Jr., the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. He wants to purge the military of
“woke” generals and DEI programs, saying that “any general that was
involved, general, admiral, whatever, that was involved in any of the DEI,
woke s— has got to go.” This then invites the question: would those who
remain be similarly purged if a Democratic administration wins the White
House in 2028?

If this started a snowball effect of politically purging military leaders,
who would then lead our military? It would constantly be in flux, changing
with the whims of the parties themselves.


Hegseth also opposed including women in combat roles, stating this year
that “I’m straight up just saying that we should not have women in combat roles.” This is an alarming position, given the current recruiting crisis
in our military. Today, women comprise 22 percent of our active All-
Volunteer force. The immediate effect would be that more than 4,000 fully qualified women now in combat billets, many of them pilots, would have to
be reassigned to positions and be retrained.

Would women be willing to join a military led by an individual who denies
them the opportunity to serve in roles for which they are fully qualified, simply because of their gender? And would Democrats, whom Hegseth has also disparaged, be disinclined to enlist? In a 50-50 nation, close to 75
percent of the population may be disinclined to volunteer to serve in a Hegseth-led military. A recruitment crisis could then turn into a
recruitment catastrophe.

His moral failures are informed by a 2017 rape allegation. Although no
charges were filed, he paid his accuser as part of a nondisclosure
agreement in 2020. Additionally, in August 2017, while still married to his second wife, he had a child with a Fox executive producer. These actions
are inconsistent with the espoused values of the U.S. military.


By no means am I an apologist for the Defense Department. I believe there
are many failing policies and procedures in the department, and that
greater accountability is necessary. However, the confirmation of Hegseth
would not fix these failures — it would only add to and compound them.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)