• Sunny Hostin: It's "Un-Godly, Not Christian" To Criticize "Woke" Cultur

    From Ubiquitous@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 25 04:30:45 2025
    XPost: alt.tv.the-view

    Sunny Hostin claimed on Monday that it was “un-Godly” and “not Christian” to oppose woke culture, arguing that people who did so only proved that they did not care about their neighbors.

    Hostin and “The View” cohost Whoopi Goldberg discussed their own personal histories, saying that because they had always been around people who were fighting for things like Civil Rights and other issues, they had “never been asleep.”

    “I thought about the conversations that you and I have had, Whoopi, so many times about the co-opting of the word ‘woke,'” Hostin began. “And the fact
    that the right somehow has made it a dirty word.”

    “To be woke is a word that came out of the African American community and it was about being — acknowledging social justice inequities, acknowledging people’s suffering,” she continued. “It’s not a bad thing to care about other people, to care about the sufferings of others, and to act upon it.”

    “And so Whoopi will often tell me, ‘I’ve never been asleep,'” she added. “And that’s how I feel … so it angers me when people are like, ‘This woke stuff gotta go.’ That’s telling me that you don’t care about my lived experience,
    you don’t care about the oppression of the LGBTQ community, you don’t care about the oppression of the disabled, you don’t care about the oppression of immigrants, you don’t care about your fellow neighbors — and that is un-
    Godly, that is not Christian.”

    WATCH:

    Fake Republican suggests Christians are hypocrites for not being
    "woke." "They don't care about it while wearing big, fat crosses
    around their necks," she chides.
    Whoopi claims Being woke "will make you a better person."
    pic.twitter.com/3QCbEzPxMY

    — Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) February 24, 2025

    “You know what the most ironic thing is?” Ana Navarro asked. “They don’t care about it, and they don’t care about it while wearing big, fat crosses around their necks.”

    Goldberg weighed in as well, saying that being exposed to “woke” was what actually made people better and arguing that positive change could really
    only be made by making people uncomfortable.

    --
    Trump Deportions
    Day 35
    37660

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to Ubiquitous on Tue Feb 25 18:43:43 2025
    XPost: alt.tv.the-view

    On Feb 25, 2025 at 1:30:45 AM PST, "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

    Sunny Hostin claimed on Monday that it was "un-Godly" and "not Christian" to oppose woke culture, arguing that people who did so only proved that they did

    not care about their neighbors.

    Hostin and THE VIEW cohost Whoopi Goldberg discussed their own personal histories, saying that because they had always been around people who were fighting for things like Civil Rights and other issues, they had "never been asleep".

    "I thought about the conversations that you and I have had, Whoopi, so many times about the co-opting of the word 'woke,'" Hostin began. "And the fact that the right somehow has made it a dirty word."

    The meanings of words change over time, Sunny. You're allegedly a highly-educated lawyer, so you should know that.

    Do we need to go over the history of the word 'gay' for that concept to sink through that bone spur you call a skull?

    "And so Whoopi will often tell me, 'I've never been asleep,'" she added. "And

    that's how I feel... so it angers me when people are like, 'This woke stuff gotta go.' That's telling me that you don't care about my lived experience

    Well, you got that one right, Sunny. I don't care about your 'lived experience'. You're one of the most racist people on TV. You're a horrible person and whatever experiences you've had concern me not in the slightest.

    And what the hell is 'lived experience, anyway? What other experience could
    you have other than that through which you've lived?

    you don't care about the oppression of the LGBTQ community

    What more protections do they need? They've already been included in the civil rights statutes as a protected class and they have Hollywood, the government, academia, and every major corporation constantly celebrating them like the second coming. When you have every sector of society throwing you a party, you're no longer oppressed.

    you don't care about the oppression of immigrants

    This is 'progressive' code for, "You're a racist if you oppose unfettered illegal immigration and complete non-enforcement of United States immigration law."

    Goldberg weighed in as well, saying that being exposed to "woke" was what actually made people better and arguing that positive change could really only be made by making people uncomfortable.

    Except when protesters and activists make Democrats uncomfortable, right, Hoo-Pie?

    We get this all the time from Democrats. They advocate for all sorts of in-your-face activism until someone turns their tactics around on them and all of sudden it becomes "harassment" and "fascism" and "the destruction of democracy".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From shawn@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 25 13:51:44 2025
    On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 18:43:43 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
    wrote:

    On Feb 25, 2025 at 1:30:45 AM PST, "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

    Sunny Hostin claimed on Monday that it was "un-Godly" and "not Christian" to >> oppose woke culture, arguing that people who did so only proved that they did

    not care about their neighbors.

    Hostin and THE VIEW cohost Whoopi Goldberg discussed their own personal
    histories, saying that because they had always been around people who were >> fighting for things like Civil Rights and other issues, they had "never been >> asleep".

    "I thought about the conversations that you and I have had, Whoopi, so many >> times about the co-opting of the word 'woke,'" Hostin began. "And the fact >> that the right somehow has made it a dirty word."

    The meanings of words change over time, Sunny. You're allegedly a >highly-educated lawyer, so you should know that.

    Do we need to go over the history of the word 'gay' for that concept to sink >through that bone spur you call a skull?

    She would like dance with gay abandon while you talk about that
    history.

    "And so Whoopi will often tell me, 'I've never been asleep,'" she added. "And

    that's how I feel... so it angers me when people are like, 'This woke stuff >> gotta go.' That's telling me that you don't care about my lived experience

    Well, you got that one right, Sunny. I don't care about your 'lived >experience'. You're one of the most racist people on TV. You're a horrible >person and whatever experiences you've had concern me not in the slightest.

    And what the hell is 'lived experience, anyway? What other experience could >you have other than that through which you've lived?

    I'm sure she means her "lived experience" which makes her better to
    talk about this subject than you and your "lived experience".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 25 19:39:59 2025
    On Feb 25, 2025 at 10:51:44 AM PST, "shawn" <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

    On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 18:43:43 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
    wrote:

    On Feb 25, 2025 at 1:30:45 AM PST, "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote: >>
    Sunny Hostin claimed on Monday that it was "un-Godly" and "not Christian" >>> to
    oppose woke culture, arguing that people who did so only proved that they >>> did

    not care about their neighbors.

    Hostin and THE VIEW cohost Whoopi Goldberg discussed their own personal >>> histories, saying that because they had always been around people who were >>> fighting for things like Civil Rights and other issues, they had "never >>> been
    asleep".

    "I thought about the conversations that you and I have had, Whoopi, so many
    times about the co-opting of the word 'woke,'" Hostin began. "And the fact >>> that the right somehow has made it a dirty word."

    The meanings of words change over time, Sunny. You're allegedly a
    highly-educated lawyer, so you should know that.

    Do we need to go over the history of the word 'gay' for that concept to sink >> through that bone spur you call a skull?

    She would like dance with gay abandon while you talk about that
    history.

    "And so Whoopi will often tell me, 'I've never been asleep,'" she added. >>> "And

    that's how I feel... so it angers me when people are like, 'This woke stuff
    gotta go.' That's telling me that you don't care about my lived experience >>
    Well, you got that one right, Sunny. I don't care about your 'lived
    experience'. You're one of the most racist people on TV. You're a horrible >> person and whatever experiences you've had concern me not in the slightest. >>
    And what the hell is 'lived experience, anyway? What other experience could >> you have other than that through which you've lived?

    I'm sure she means her "lived experience" which makes her better to
    talk about this subject than you and your "lived experience".

    Well, sure, but why not simply call it 'experience', since there can be no other kind?

    People-- particularly on the Left, but sometimes on the Right, as well-- seem to feel obligated to constantly make up new jargony terms for stuff that can already by described using normal words in the English language.

    'Social distance' is another one that leaps to mind. Why did we need a new
    term for that? Why couldn't we just call it 'distance'? It's literally means the same thing.

    Another one that recently seems to have spread everywhere is the use of 'giving' to mean 'implies' or 'seems like'. This is particularly popular among GenZers. They say things like,

    "She's giving jealousy" instead of "She seems jealous."

    and

    "That trailer's giving STAR WARS" instead of "That trailer seems like a STAR WARS copy."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From shawn@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 25 15:08:14 2025
    On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 19:39:59 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
    wrote:

    On Feb 25, 2025 at 10:51:44 AM PST, "shawn" <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> >wrote:

    On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 18:43:43 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
    wrote:

    On Feb 25, 2025 at 1:30:45 AM PST, "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote: >>>
    Sunny Hostin claimed on Monday that it was "un-Godly" and "not Christian" >>>> to
    oppose woke culture, arguing that people who did so only proved that they >>>> did

    not care about their neighbors.

    Hostin and THE VIEW cohost Whoopi Goldberg discussed their own personal >>>> histories, saying that because they had always been around people who were
    fighting for things like Civil Rights and other issues, they had "never >>>> been
    asleep".

    "I thought about the conversations that you and I have had, Whoopi, so many
    times about the co-opting of the word 'woke,'" Hostin began. "And the fact
    that the right somehow has made it a dirty word."

    The meanings of words change over time, Sunny. You're allegedly a
    highly-educated lawyer, so you should know that.

    Do we need to go over the history of the word 'gay' for that concept to sink
    through that bone spur you call a skull?

    She would likely dance with gay abandon while you talk about that
    history.

    "And so Whoopi will often tell me, 'I've never been asleep,'" she added. >>>> "And

    that's how I feel... so it angers me when people are like, 'This woke stuff
    gotta go.' That's telling me that you don't care about my lived experience

    Well, you got that one right, Sunny. I don't care about your 'lived
    experience'. You're one of the most racist people on TV. You're a horrible >>> person and whatever experiences you've had concern me not in the slightest. >>>
    And what the hell is 'lived experience, anyway? What other experience could >>> you have other than that through which you've lived?

    I'm sure she means her "lived experience" which makes her better to
    talk about this subject than you and your "lived experience".

    Well, sure, but why not simply call it 'experience', since there can be no >other kind?

    Because "experience" is a generic term and there's an attempt to put
    some special meaning to the term "lived experience." Probably to put
    imply more of an emotional connection to the lifetime's worth of
    experience.

    People-- particularly on the Left, but sometimes on the Right, as well-- seem >to feel obligated to constantly make up new jargony terms for stuff that can >already by described using normal words in the English language.

    Oh, so you mean that should only be allowed by lawyers? ;)


    'Social distance' is another one that leaps to mind. Why did we need a new >term for that? Why couldn't we just call it 'distance'? It's literally means >the same thing.

    It doesn't really. Social distance means staying outside of someone's
    social bubble. Which means it isn't a set distance as what I might
    require to feel comfortable is likely different from what you or Anim
    might require.


    Another one that recently seems to have spread everywhere is the use of >'giving' to mean 'implies' or 'seems like'. This is particularly popular among >GenZers. They say things like,

    "She's giving jealousy" instead of "She seems jealous."

    Haven't seen that one. I would be a bit confused by someone saying the
    former as I'm not sure how one gives jealousy. Does it come in the
    form of a pill?

    and

    "That trailer's giving STAR WARS" instead of "That trailer seems like a STAR >WARS copy."


    I could see the former if they had said "STAR WARS vibes" as I would
    then have a sense of what they were meaning and maybe that is what was
    meant. Just that the writer chose to leave off the "vibes" portion as
    they saw it as a given thing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 25 20:15:48 2025
    On Feb 25, 2025 at 12:08:14 PM PST, "shawn" <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

    On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 19:39:59 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
    wrote:

    On Feb 25, 2025 at 10:51:44 AM PST, "shawn" <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> >> wrote:

    On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 18:43:43 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
    wrote:

    On Feb 25, 2025 at 1:30:45 AM PST, "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

    Sunny Hostin claimed on Monday that it was "un-Godly" and "not Christian"
    to
    oppose woke culture, arguing that people who did so only proved that they
    did

    not care about their neighbors.

    Hostin and THE VIEW cohost Whoopi Goldberg discussed their own personal >>>>> histories, saying that because they had always been around people who were
    fighting for things like Civil Rights and other issues, they had "never >>>>> been
    asleep".

    "I thought about the conversations that you and I have had, Whoopi, so >>>>> many
    times about the co-opting of the word 'woke,'" Hostin began. "And the fact
    that the right somehow has made it a dirty word."

    The meanings of words change over time, Sunny. You're allegedly a
    highly-educated lawyer, so you should know that.

    Do we need to go over the history of the word 'gay' for that concept to sink
    through that bone spur you call a skull?

    She would likely dance with gay abandon while you talk about that
    history.

    "And so Whoopi will often tell me, 'I've never been asleep,'" she added.
    "And

    that's how I feel... so it angers me when people are like, 'This woke >>>>> stuff
    gotta go.' That's telling me that you don't care about my lived experience

    Well, you got that one right, Sunny. I don't care about your 'lived
    experience'. You're one of the most racist people on TV. You're a horrible
    person and whatever experiences you've had concern me not in the slightest.

    And what the hell is 'lived experience, anyway? What other experience could
    you have other than that through which you've lived?

    I'm sure she means her "lived experience" which makes her better to
    talk about this subject than you and your "lived experience".

    Well, sure, but why not simply call it 'experience', since there can be no >> other kind?

    Because "experience" is a generic term and there's an attempt to put
    some special meaning to the term "lived experience."

    Exactly. All the smarmy jargon is supposed to make you think they're somehow special or smarter than you are.

    People-- particularly on the Left, but sometimes on the Right, as well-- seem
    to feel obligated to constantly make up new jargony terms for stuff that can >> already by described using normal words in the English language.

    Oh, so you mean that should only be allowed by lawyers? ;)

    'Social distance' is another one that leaps to mind. Why did we need a new >> term for that? Why couldn't we just call it 'distance'? It's literally means >> the same thing.

    It doesn't really. Social distance means staying outside of someone's
    social bubble. Which means it isn't a set distance as what I might
    require to feel comfortable is likely different from what you or Anim
    might require.

    It actually *was* a set distance. Fauci and the CDC claimed it was six feet, which we now know to have been completely made-up with no basis in science.

    Another one that recently seems to have spread everywhere is the use of
    'giving' to mean 'implies' or 'seems like'. This is particularly popular
    among
    GenZers. They say things like,

    "She's giving jealousy" instead of "She seems jealous."

    Haven't seen that one. I would be a bit confused by someone saying the
    former as I'm not sure how one gives jealousy. Does it come in the
    form of a pill?

    and

    "That trailer's giving STAR WARS" instead of "That trailer seems like a STAR >> WARS copy."

    I could see the former if they had said "STAR WARS vibes" as I would
    then have a sense of what they were meaning and maybe that is what was
    meant. Just that the writer chose to leave off the "vibes" portion as
    they saw it as a given thing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 25 16:56:47 2025
    On 2/25/2025 3:15 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Feb 25, 2025 at 12:08:14 PM PST, "shawn" <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

    On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 19:39:59 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
    wrote:

    On Feb 25, 2025 at 10:51:44 AM PST, "shawn" <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
    wrote:

    On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 18:43:43 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
    wrote:

    On Feb 25, 2025 at 1:30:45 AM PST, "Ubiquitous" <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:

    Sunny Hostin claimed on Monday that it was "un-Godly" and "not Christian"
    to
    oppose woke culture, arguing that people who did so only proved that they
    did

    not care about their neighbors.

    Hostin and THE VIEW cohost Whoopi Goldberg discussed their own personal
    histories, saying that because they had always been around people who were
    fighting for things like Civil Rights and other issues, they had "never
    been
    asleep".

    "I thought about the conversations that you and I have had, Whoopi, so
    many
    times about the co-opting of the word 'woke,'" Hostin began. "And the fact
    that the right somehow has made it a dirty word."

    The meanings of words change over time, Sunny. You're allegedly a
    highly-educated lawyer, so you should know that.

    Do we need to go over the history of the word 'gay' for that concept to sink
    through that bone spur you call a skull?

    She would likely dance with gay abandon while you talk about that
    history.

    "And so Whoopi will often tell me, 'I've never been asleep,'" she added.
    "And

    that's how I feel... so it angers me when people are like, 'This woke >>>>>> stuff
    gotta go.' That's telling me that you don't care about my lived experience

    Well, you got that one right, Sunny. I don't care about your 'lived >>>>> experience'. You're one of the most racist people on TV. You're a horrible
    person and whatever experiences you've had concern me not in the slightest.

    And what the hell is 'lived experience, anyway? What other experience could
    you have other than that through which you've lived?

    I'm sure she means her "lived experience" which makes her better to
    talk about this subject than you and your "lived experience".

    Well, sure, but why not simply call it 'experience', since there can be no >>> other kind?

    Because "experience" is a generic term and there's an attempt to put
    some special meaning to the term "lived experience."

    Exactly. All the smarmy jargon is supposed to make you think they're somehow special or smarter than you are.

    I'd think that "lived experience" connotes an experience that's befallen
    one over time, rather than, say, a brief experience purposely sought.

    Let's not trash useful expressions for the sake of ridicule.


    People-- particularly on the Left, but sometimes on the Right, as well-- seem
    to feel obligated to constantly make up new jargony terms for stuff that can
    already by described using normal words in the English language.

    Oh, so you mean that should only be allowed by lawyers? ;)

    'Social distance' is another one that leaps to mind. Why did we need a new >>> term for that? Why couldn't we just call it 'distance'? It's literally means
    the same thing.

    It doesn't really. Social distance means staying outside of someone's
    social bubble. Which means it isn't a set distance as what I might
    require to feel comfortable is likely different from what you or Anim
    might require.

    It actually *was* a set distance. Fauci and the CDC claimed it was six feet, which we now know to have been completely made-up with no basis in science.

    ...

    'Six feet' may have been "made up" with respect to 'five feet' or 'seven
    feet' but not with respect to 'one foot' or 'exchanging spit'. It's the distance most people can easily fathom...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to shawn on Wed Feb 26 00:28:35 2025
    shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

    . . .

    Because "experience" is a generic term and there's an attempt to put
    some special meaning to the term "lived experience." Probably to put
    imply more of an emotional connection to the lifetime's worth of
    experience.

    For much of my childhood, my family lived in the suburbs. No one can
    know how I grew up. No one! It was... not like a John Hughes movie, more
    like Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

    People-- particularly on the Left, but sometimes on the Right, as well-- seem >>to feel obligated to constantly make up new jargony terms for stuff that can >>already by described using normal words in the English language.

    Oh, so you mean that should only be allowed by lawyers? ;)

    No. Educators.

    . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 7 20:36:28 2025
    On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 04:30:45 -0500, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
    wrote:

    “You know what the most ironic thing is?” Ana Navarro asked. “They don’t care >about it, and they don’t care about it while wearing big, fat crosses around >their necks.”

    Goldberg weighed in as well, saying that being exposed to “woke” was what >actually made people better and arguing that positive change could really >only be made by making people uncomfortable.

    On the contrary - the wokesters are the ultimate rejection of ML
    King's wanting his children to be judged by the quality of their
    character rather than the color of their skin.

    For the truly woke, what group one belongs to means more than anything
    they themselves have done.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com on Fri Mar 7 20:42:09 2025
    On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 15:08:14 -0500, shawn
    <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

    'Social distance' is another one that leaps to mind. Why did we need a new >>term for that? Why couldn't we just call it 'distance'? It's literally means >>the same thing.

    It doesn't really. Social distance means staying outside of someone's
    social bubble. Which means it isn't a set distance as what I might
    require to feel comfortable is likely different from what you or Anim
    might require.

    Which is obviously an objective measure since 'social distance' varies depending on who you're talking about - for instance one's "distance"
    will be different depending on whether it's your partner, other family
    member, someone you know and a total stranger.

    If your child takes you by surprise with a big hug you're likely to
    respond more favorably than if the hugger is a total stranger.

    So I confess I tend to be sarcastic about 'social distance' and
    generally stay back unless/until I know a closer approach is welcome.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)