• [OT] Diversity cult coming for Shakespeare

    From Rhino@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 20 12:10:54 2025
    William Shakespeare is apparently so "problematic" that activists are
    working hard to "de-colonize" him. Leo Kearse explains:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuNgnoBSXAA [18 minutes]

    As Kearse points out, it is *extremely* ironic that the people in the Shakespeare Trust, who are supposed to be fans of his work, are the ones
    trying to "de-colonize" him. With "friends" like that, who needs enemies?


    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to Rhino on Thu Mar 20 14:45:03 2025
    On 3/20/2025 12:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    William Shakespeare is apparently so "problematic" that activists are
    working hard to "de-colonize" him. Leo Kearse explains:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuNgnoBSXAA [18 minutes]

    As Kearse points out, it is *extremely* ironic that the people in the Shakespeare Trust, who are supposed to be fans of his work, are the ones trying to "de-colonize" him. With "friends" like that, who needs enemies?

    Shakespeare was a playwright and poet. His actual verbiage is what we
    admire, rather than whatever philosophy we might gratuitously infer from
    it. "Polishing" his words would be like applying CGI to the Mona Lisa.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Thu Mar 20 19:21:27 2025
    On Mar 20, 2025 at 11:45:03 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 3/20/2025 12:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    William Shakespeare is apparently so "problematic" that activists are
    working hard to "de-colonize" him. Leo Kearse explains:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuNgnoBSXAA [18 minutes]

    As Kearse points out, it is *extremely* ironic that the people in the
    Shakespeare Trust, who are supposed to be fans of his work, are the ones
    trying to "de-colonize" him. With "friends" like that, who needs enemies?

    Shakespeare was a playwright and poet. His actual verbiage is what we admire, rather than whatever philosophy we might gratuitously infer from
    it. "Polishing" his words would be like applying CGI to the Mona Lisa.

    Shakespeare was also an Englishman who wrote his plays in England. There was
    no 'colonization' there to begin with, so when they 'decolonize' him by bringing in black and other BIPOC 'voices', they're actually doing what the claim to abhor: supplanting the voice of an indigenous person with that of interlopers from other lands. In other words, they're not 'decolonizing' Shakespeare, they're a bunch of racists who are 'colonizing' an indigenous voice.

    But that's okay, you see, because that indigenous voice is white.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From shawn@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 20 15:49:28 2025
    On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 19:21:27 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
    wrote:

    On Mar 20, 2025 at 11:45:03 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 3/20/2025 12:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    William Shakespeare is apparently so "problematic" that activists are
    working hard to "de-colonize" him. Leo Kearse explains:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuNgnoBSXAA [18 minutes]

    As Kearse points out, it is *extremely* ironic that the people in the
    Shakespeare Trust, who are supposed to be fans of his work, are the ones >>> trying to "de-colonize" him. With "friends" like that, who needs enemies? >>
    Shakespeare was a playwright and poet. His actual verbiage is what we
    admire, rather than whatever philosophy we might gratuitously infer from
    it. "Polishing" his words would be like applying CGI to the Mona Lisa.

    Shakespeare was also an Englishman who wrote his plays in England. There was >no 'colonization' there to begin with, so when they 'decolonize' him by >bringing in black and other BIPOC 'voices', they're actually doing what the >claim to abhor: supplanting the voice of an indigenous person with that of >interlopers from other lands. In other words, they're not 'decolonizing' >Shakespeare, they're a bunch of racists who are 'colonizing' an indigenous >voice.

    But that's okay, you see, because that indigenous voice is white.

    Good, I'm glad to see that you are coming around to the realization of
    what is needed in the world. Decolonize the globe (so long as it is
    the white world being decolonized.)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to moviePig on Thu Mar 20 15:55:02 2025
    On 2025-03-20 2:45 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 3/20/2025 12:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    William Shakespeare is apparently so "problematic" that activists are
    working hard to "de-colonize" him. Leo Kearse explains:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuNgnoBSXAA [18 minutes]

    As Kearse points out, it is *extremely* ironic that the people in the
    Shakespeare Trust, who are supposed to be fans of his work, are the
    ones trying to "de-colonize" him. With "friends" like that, who needs
    enemies?

    Shakespeare was a playwright and poet.  His actual verbiage is what we admire, rather than whatever philosophy we might gratuitously infer from it.  "Polishing" his words would be like applying CGI to the Mona Lisa.


    Who are you and what have you done with the real moviePig? The real
    moviePig would NEVER oppose a "progressive" re-thinking of Shakespeare!

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 20 15:55:46 2025
    On 3/20/2025 3:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Mar 20, 2025 at 11:45:03 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 3/20/2025 12:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    William Shakespeare is apparently so "problematic" that activists are
    working hard to "de-colonize" him. Leo Kearse explains:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuNgnoBSXAA [18 minutes]

    As Kearse points out, it is *extremely* ironic that the people in the
    Shakespeare Trust, who are supposed to be fans of his work, are the ones >>> trying to "de-colonize" him. With "friends" like that, who needs enemies? >>
    Shakespeare was a playwright and poet. His actual verbiage is what we
    admire, rather than whatever philosophy we might gratuitously infer from
    it. "Polishing" his words would be like applying CGI to the Mona Lisa.

    Shakespeare was also an Englishman who wrote his plays in England. There was no 'colonization' there to begin with, so when they 'decolonize' him by bringing in black and other BIPOC 'voices', they're actually doing what the claim to abhor: supplanting the voice of an indigenous person with that of interlopers from other lands. In other words, they're not 'decolonizing' Shakespeare, they're a bunch of racists who are 'colonizing' an indigenous voice.

    But that's okay, you see, because that indigenous voice is white.

    On yet another tack, it's hard to imagine Shakespeare's being read today
    by anyone who's still in their formative years re "colonialization"
    (...outside of a classroom, that is, with moats of prefatory guidance).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to Rhino on Thu Mar 20 16:50:51 2025
    On 3/20/2025 3:55 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-03-20 2:45 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 3/20/2025 12:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    William Shakespeare is apparently so "problematic" that activists are
    working hard to "de-colonize" him. Leo Kearse explains:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuNgnoBSXAA [18 minutes]

    As Kearse points out, it is *extremely* ironic that the people in the
    Shakespeare Trust, who are supposed to be fans of his work, are the
    ones trying to "de-colonize" him. With "friends" like that, who needs
    enemies?

    Shakespeare was a playwright and poet.  His actual verbiage is what we
    admire, rather than whatever philosophy we might gratuitously infer
    from it.  "Polishing" his words would be like applying CGI to the Mona
    Lisa.


    Who are you and what have you done with the real moviePig? The real
    moviePig would NEVER oppose a "progressive" re-thinking of Shakespeare!

    The real moviePig has yet to see any bowdlerizing as progress.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to moviePig on Thu Mar 20 18:34:03 2025
    On 2025-03-20 4:50 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 3/20/2025 3:55 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-03-20 2:45 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 3/20/2025 12:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    William Shakespeare is apparently so "problematic" that activists
    are working hard to "de-colonize" him. Leo Kearse explains:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuNgnoBSXAA [18 minutes]

    As Kearse points out, it is *extremely* ironic that the people in
    the Shakespeare Trust, who are supposed to be fans of his work, are
    the ones trying to "de-colonize" him. With "friends" like that, who
    needs enemies?

    Shakespeare was a playwright and poet.  His actual verbiage is what
    we admire, rather than whatever philosophy we might gratuitously
    infer from it.  "Polishing" his words would be like applying CGI to
    the Mona Lisa.


    Who are you and what have you done with the real moviePig? The real
    moviePig would NEVER oppose a "progressive" re-thinking of Shakespeare!

    The real moviePig has yet to see any bowdlerizing as progress.


    Colour me shocked. I didn't think there was *any* "progressive" proposal
    that you would ever oppose. Maybe there's hope for you yet....

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to moviePig on Fri Mar 21 16:58:40 2025
    On 2025-03-20 18:45:03 +0000, moviePig said:

    On 3/20/2025 12:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    William Shakespeare is apparently so "problematic" that activists are
    working hard to "de-colonize" him. Leo Kearse explains:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuNgnoBSXAA [18 minutes]

    As Kearse points out, it is *extremely* ironic that the people in the
    Shakespeare Trust, who are supposed to be fans of his work, are the
    ones trying to "de-colonize" him. With "friends" like that, who needs
    enemies?

    Among many others, there has already been:

    - in America, a production of "King Lear" on Broadway with Glenda
    Jackson in the lead role.

    - in New Zealand, productions of "Taming of the Shrew" with an
    "all-female-identiying" cast and a "feminist version" of
    "Henry V". (For the sake of 'equality', there has also been an
    all-male production of "Twelftth Night", although that of course
    is how plays used to be performed.) There have also been various
    Shakespeare plays done fully in the Maori language.




    Shakespeare was a playwright and poet. His actual verbiage is what we admire,

    *We* don't admire anything of the boring garbage writings by
    Shakespeare. *We* were forced to read the useless nonsense in high
    school. :-)



    rather than whatever philosophy we might gratuitously infer from it. "Polishing" his words would be like applying CGI to the Mona Lisa.

    Not really. The Mona Lisa is a good painting, and adding CGI would ruin
    it. Polishing Shakespeare's boring words is like polishing dog poo ...
    it's still going to be dog poo, just shiny. :-p

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to Your Name on Fri Mar 21 11:29:58 2025
    On 3/20/2025 11:58 PM, Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-03-20 18:45:03 +0000, moviePig said:

    On 3/20/2025 12:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    William Shakespeare is apparently so "problematic" that activists are
    working hard to "de-colonize" him. Leo Kearse explains:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuNgnoBSXAA [18 minutes]

    As Kearse points out, it is *extremely* ironic that the people in the
    Shakespeare Trust, who are supposed to be fans of his work, are the
    ones trying to "de-colonize" him. With "friends" like that, who needs
    enemies?

    Among many others, there has already been:

     - in America, a production of "King Lear" on Broadway with Glenda
       Jackson in the lead role.

     - in New Zealand, productions of "Taming of the Shrew" with an
       "all-female-identiying" cast and a "feminist version" of
       "Henry V". (For the sake of 'equality', there has also been an
       all-male production of "Twelftth Night", although that of course
       is how plays used to be performed.) There have also been various
       Shakespeare plays done fully in the Maori language.
    ...

    But afaics those don't purport to "correct flaws" in the original.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pluted Pup@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 21 13:37:55 2025
    On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 12:21:27 -0700, BTR1701 wrote:

    On Mar 20, 2025 at 11:45:03 AM PDT, "moviePig"<nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 3/20/2025 12:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    William Shakespeare is apparently so "problematic" that activists are working hard to "de-colonize" him. Leo Kearse explains:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuNgnoBSXAA [18 minutes]

    As Kearse points out, it is *extremely* ironic that the people in the Shakespeare Trust, who are supposed to be fans of his work, are the ones trying to "de-colonize" him. With "friends" like that, who needs enemies?

    Shakespeare was a playwright and poet. His actual verbiage is what we admire, rather than whatever philosophy we might gratuitously infer from it. "Polishing" his words would be like applying CGI to the Mona Lisa.

    Shakespeare was also an Englishman who wrote his plays in England. There was no 'colonization' there to begin with, so when they 'decolonize' him by bringing in black and other BIPOC 'voices', they're actually doing what the claim to abhor: supplanting the voice of an indigenous person with that of interlopers from other lands. In other words, they're not 'decolonizing' Shakespeare, they're a bunch of racists who are 'colonizing' an indigenous voice.

    But that's okay, you see, because that indigenous voice is white.

    The fundamental idea of political correctness is that
    racial hatred against whites is always justified.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to Your Name on Fri Mar 21 21:48:26 2025
    On Mar 20, 2025 at 8:58:40 PM PDT, "Your Name" <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

    On 2025-03-20 18:45:03 +0000, moviePig said:

    On 3/20/2025 12:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    William Shakespeare is apparently so "problematic" that activists are
    working hard to "de-colonize" him. Leo Kearse explains:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuNgnoBSXAA [18 minutes]

    As Kearse points out, it is *extremely* ironic that the people in the
    Shakespeare Trust, who are supposed to be fans of his work, are the
    ones trying to "de-colonize" him. With "friends" like that, who needs
    enemies?

    Among many others, there has already been:

    - in America, a production of "King Lear" on Broadway with Glenda
    Jackson in the lead role.

    - in New Zealand, productions of "Taming of the Shrew" with an
    "all-female-identiying" cast and a "feminist version" of
    "Henry V". (For the sake of 'equality', there has also been an
    all-male production of "Twelftth Night", although that of course
    is how plays used to be performed.) There have also been various
    Shakespeare plays done fully in the Maori language.

    Shakespeare was a playwright and poet. His actual verbiage is what we
    admire,

    *We* don't admire anything of the boring garbage writings by
    Shakespeare. *We* were forced to read the useless nonsense in high
    school. :-)

    Speak for yourself. I quite enjoy Shakespeare's works.

    rather than whatever philosophy we might gratuitously infer from it.
    "Polishing" his words would be like applying CGI to the Mona Lisa.

    Not really. The Mona Lisa is a good painting, and adding CGI would ruin
    it. Polishing Shakespeare's boring words is like polishing dog poo ...
    it's still going to be dog poo, just shiny. :-p

    Just because it's not your cup of tea, doesn't make it shit.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to moviePig on Sat Mar 22 12:49:26 2025
    On 2025-03-21 15:29:58 +0000, moviePig said:
    On 3/20/2025 11:58 PM, Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-03-20 18:45:03 +0000, moviePig said:
    On 3/20/2025 12:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    William Shakespeare is apparently so "problematic" that activists are
    working hard to "de-colonize" him. Leo Kearse explains:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuNgnoBSXAA [18 minutes]

    As Kearse points out, it is *extremely* ironic that the people in the
    Shakespeare Trust, who are supposed to be fans of his work, are the
    ones trying to "de-colonize" him. With "friends" like that, who needs
    enemies?

    Among many others, there has already been:

     - in America, a production of "King Lear" on Broadway with Glenda
       Jackson in the lead role.

     - in New Zealand, productions of "Taming of the Shrew" with an
       "all-female-identiying" cast and a "feminist version" of
       "Henry V". (For the sake of 'equality', there has also been an
       all-male production of "Twelftth Night", although that of course
       is how plays used to be performed.) There have also been various
       Shakespeare plays done fully in the Maori language.
    ...

    But afaics those don't purport to "correct flaws" in the original.

    They sort-of do ... the "Politically Correct" whiners' so-called 'flaw'
    of not having female leads / characters or the so-called 'flaw' of not
    having many shows performed in the Maori language.

    As usual, the "Politically Correct" whiners' 'solution' is to simply
    hijack and butcher existing material to suit themselves, rather than
    having any actual creative talent to make new things theselves.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to Your Name on Fri Mar 21 22:32:54 2025
    On 3/21/2025 7:49 PM, Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-03-21 15:29:58 +0000, moviePig said:
    On 3/20/2025 11:58 PM, Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-03-20 18:45:03 +0000, moviePig said:
    On 3/20/2025 12:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    William Shakespeare is apparently so "problematic" that activists
    are working hard to "de-colonize" him. Leo Kearse explains:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuNgnoBSXAA [18 minutes]

    As Kearse points out, it is *extremely* ironic that the people in
    the Shakespeare Trust, who are supposed to be fans of his work, are
    the ones trying to "de-colonize" him. With "friends" like that, who
    needs enemies?

    Among many others, there has already been:

     - in America, a production of "King Lear" on Broadway with Glenda
       Jackson in the lead role.

     - in New Zealand, productions of "Taming of the Shrew" with an
       "all-female-identiying" cast and a "feminist version" of
       "Henry V". (For the sake of 'equality', there has also been an
       all-male production of "Twelftth Night", although that of course
       is how plays used to be performed.) There have also been various
       Shakespeare plays done fully in the Maori language.
    ...

    But afaics those don't purport to "correct flaws" in the original.

    They sort-of do ... the "Politically Correct" whiners' so-called 'flaw'
    of not having female leads / characters or the so-called 'flaw' of not
    having many shows performed in the Maori language.

    As usual, the "Politically Correct" whiners' 'solution' is to simply
    hijack and butcher existing material to suit themselves, rather than
    having any actual creative talent to make new things theselves.

    I'd guess that a female Lear is presented in the *context* of the
    original, not *instead* of it ...and that audiences attend largely out
    of curiosity about such an enterprise. Surely there's no proposal to permanently neuter Shakespeare's play.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to atropos@mac.com on Sat Mar 22 06:12:32 2025
    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
    On Mar 20, 2025 at 8:58:40 PM PDT, "Your Name" <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

    On 2025-03-20 18:45:03 +0000, moviePig said:

    On 3/20/2025 12:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    William Shakespeare is apparently so "problematic" that activists are >>>> working hard to "de-colonize" him. Leo Kearse explains:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuNgnoBSXAA [18 minutes]

    As Kearse points out, it is *extremely* ironic that the people in the >>>> Shakespeare Trust, who are supposed to be fans of his work, are the
    ones trying to "de-colonize" him. With "friends" like that, who needs >>>> enemies?

    Among many others, there has already been:

    - in America, a production of "King Lear" on Broadway with Glenda
    Jackson in the lead role.

    - in New Zealand, productions of "Taming of the Shrew" with an
    "all-female-identiying" cast and a "feminist version" of
    "Henry V". (For the sake of 'equality', there has also been an
    all-male production of "Twelftth Night", although that of course
    is how plays used to be performed.) There have also been various
    Shakespeare plays done fully in the Maori language.

    Shakespeare was a playwright and poet. His actual verbiage is what we
    admire,

    *We* don't admire anything of the boring garbage writings by
    Shakespeare. *We* were forced to read the useless nonsense in high
    school. :-)

    Speak for yourself. I quite enjoy Shakespeare's works.

    I love Forbidden Planet.

    rather than whatever philosophy we might gratuitously infer from it.
    "Polishing" his words would be like applying CGI to the Mona Lisa.

    Not really. The Mona Lisa is a good painting, and adding CGI would ruin
    it. Polishing Shakespeare's boring words is like polishing dog poo ...
    it's still going to be dog poo, just shiny. :-p

    Just because it's not your cup of tea, doesn't make it shit.



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 22 06:30:07 2025
    On Mar 21, 2025 at 11:12:32 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com>
    wrote:

    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
    On Mar 20, 2025 at 8:58:40 PM PDT, "Your Name" <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote: >>
    On 2025-03-20 18:45:03 +0000, moviePig said:

    On 3/20/2025 12:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    William Shakespeare is apparently so "problematic" that activists are >>>>> working hard to "de-colonize" him. Leo Kearse explains:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuNgnoBSXAA [18 minutes]

    As Kearse points out, it is *extremely* ironic that the people in the >>>>> Shakespeare Trust, who are supposed to be fans of his work, are the >>>>> ones trying to "de-colonize" him. With "friends" like that, who needs >>>>> enemies?

    Among many others, there has already been:

    - in America, a production of "King Lear" on Broadway with Glenda
    Jackson in the lead role.

    - in New Zealand, productions of "Taming of the Shrew" with an
    "all-female-identiying" cast and a "feminist version" of
    "Henry V". (For the sake of 'equality', there has also been an
    all-male production of "Twelftth Night", although that of course
    is how plays used to be performed.) There have also been various
    Shakespeare plays done fully in the Maori language.

    Shakespeare was a playwright and poet. His actual verbiage is what we >>>> admire,

    *We* don't admire anything of the boring garbage writings by
    Shakespeare. *We* were forced to read the useless nonsense in high
    school. :-)

    Speak for yourself. I quite enjoy Shakespeare's works.

    I love Forbidden Planet.

    My favorite is WEST SIDE STORY. Who knew the guy could write music as well as could write prose?!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 22 11:26:00 2025
    On 3/22/2025 2:30 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Mar 21, 2025 at 11:12:32 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
    On Mar 20, 2025 at 8:58:40 PM PDT, "Your Name" <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

    On 2025-03-20 18:45:03 +0000, moviePig said:

    On 3/20/2025 12:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    William Shakespeare is apparently so "problematic" that activists are >>>>>> working hard to "de-colonize" him. Leo Kearse explains:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuNgnoBSXAA [18 minutes]

    As Kearse points out, it is *extremely* ironic that the people in the >>>>>> Shakespeare Trust, who are supposed to be fans of his work, are the >>>>>> ones trying to "de-colonize" him. With "friends" like that, who needs >>>>>> enemies?

    Among many others, there has already been:

    - in America, a production of "King Lear" on Broadway with Glenda
    Jackson in the lead role.

    - in New Zealand, productions of "Taming of the Shrew" with an
    "all-female-identiying" cast and a "feminist version" of
    "Henry V". (For the sake of 'equality', there has also been an
    all-male production of "Twelftth Night", although that of course >>>> is how plays used to be performed.) There have also been various >>>> Shakespeare plays done fully in the Maori language.

    Shakespeare was a playwright and poet. His actual verbiage is what we >>>>> admire,

    *We* don't admire anything of the boring garbage writings by
    Shakespeare. *We* were forced to read the useless nonsense in high
    school. :-)

    Speak for yourself. I quite enjoy Shakespeare's works.

    I love Forbidden Planet.

    My favorite is WEST SIDE STORY. Who knew the guy could write music as well as could write prose?!

    Nothing wrong with the music in FORBIDDEN PLANET.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to atropos@mac.com on Sun Mar 23 09:56:29 2025
    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
    On Mar 20, 2025 at 8:58:40 PM PDT, "Your Name" <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
    On 2025-03-20 18:45:03 +0000, moviePig said:
    On 3/20/2025 12:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    William Shakespeare is apparently so "problematic" that activists are
    working hard to "de-colonize" him. Leo Kearse explains:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuNgnoBSXAA [18 minutes]

    As Kearse points out, it is *extremely* ironic that the people in the
    Shakespeare Trust, who are supposed to be fans of his work, are the
    ones trying to "de-colonize" him. With "friends" like that, who needs
    enemies?

    Among many others, there has already been:

    - in America, a production of "King Lear" on Broadway with Glenda
    Jackson in the lead role.

    - in New Zealand, productions of "Taming of the Shrew" with an
    "all-female-identiying" cast and a "feminist version" of
    "Henry V". (For the sake of 'equality', there has also been an
    all-male production of "Twelfth Night", although that of course
    is how plays used to be performed.) There have also been various
    Shakespeare plays done fully in the Maori language.

    Shakespeare was a playwright and poet. His actual verbiage is what we admire,

    *We* don't admire anything of the boring garbage writings by
    Shakespeare. *We* were forced to read the useless nonsense in high
    school. :-)

    Speak for yourself. I quite enjoy Shakespeare's works.

    That was my point. Some people might like Shakespeare, but not everyone does.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)