• Canadian Border Control screws Amish

    From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 24 06:07:13 2025
    According to this video, Canadian Border Patrol enforces a law requiring Canadians to download what is essentially privacy-violating application
    onto smart phones with lots of personal details including medical
    records. If they don't, there's a $6,000 fine imposed including against children.

    Numerous Amish found they had liens imposed against their farms.
    Obviously they don't use smart phones.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scrtSExvu3g

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to Adam H. Kerman on Mon Mar 24 06:30:06 2025
    On 2025-03-24 2:07 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    According to this video, Canadian Border Patrol enforces a law requiring Canadians to download what is essentially privacy-violating application
    onto smart phones with lots of personal details including medical
    records. If they don't, there's a $6,000 fine imposed including against children.

    Numerous Amish found they had liens imposed against their farms.
    Obviously they don't use smart phones.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scrtSExvu3g

    Just to be completely accurate, the agency that is charged with guarding
    our border is the Canadian Border Services Agency, not the Canadian
    Border Patrol. But even most Canadians probably don't know the proper
    name so I won't hold that against you ;-)

    As for this app that you are supposedly required to have, I've never
    heard of it and definitely don't have it on *my* smart phone. I've lived
    here all my life so if it really *is* mandatory, it is only mandatory
    for specific people or classes of people. It may well be for frequent border-crossers. (I haven't crossed the border to the US in 20+ years.)

    I know there's a system called Nexus that has some documentation
    requirements which apparently puts you in a much shorter line at border crossing points so that may be what the video is talking about. But you
    can still cross without Nexus, or so I was told by a former colleague
    who frequently crossed the border. You just have to deal with a much
    longer line and can expect to wait several hours at times.

    [Pause]

    Okay, I just watched the video and they're talking about ArriveCan, not
    Nexus. ArriveCan was an app the Liberals had built during Covid. They
    paid many millions of dollars to get a consulting firm to build it as a
    way to track people coming into the country but it subsequently came out
    that two people built it in a single weekend so they must have paid
    themselves very handsomely indeed - or kicked a lot of it back to some
    Liberal slush fund. (It must be a mess too because it takes considerably
    longer to build a robust and thoroughly tested app than a single
    weekend. You might be able to build a simple UNTESTED app in that time
    if you're a skilled developer but writing and running all the tests successfully is almost unimagineable. You can't even DESIGN an app that
    fast unless it is EXTREMELY trivial, let alone build and test it.) There
    was a *lot* of talk about ArriveCan in the news during Covid and believe
    me, it was not people praising it or the government.

    I haven't heard about it in a while now so assumed it was no longer
    required but I just found the ArriveCan web page, which was last updated
    in September 2024, and it looks like the app is still around! I had
    thought it was no longer required since we got past Covid but I guess
    it's just fallen off the news radar....

    As for the Amish, yes, they were indeed screwed by ArriveCan and
    presumably continue to be screwed unless they've all acquired smart
    phones since this app was launched. But if the Liberals did that to the
    Amish, I feel sure they did it to others too. Ezra Levant really should
    have done a Freedom of Information request to find out who else had this
    happen to them. Rebel News is no stranger to FOI requests, although the Liberals amended the FOI rules to give the bureaucrats MUCH more time to produce the documents; I believe they also gave them more latitude to
    redact information so it may not be possible to get much more than
    blackened pages at this point.

    Then again, maybe the Liberals really ARE that evil and deliberately
    picked on the Amish alone knowing that the Amish would endure it without
    making a ruckus.



    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From shawn@21:1/5 to no_offline_contact@example.com on Mon Mar 24 08:02:12 2025
    On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 06:30:06 -0400, Rhino
    <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    On 2025-03-24 2:07 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    According to this video, Canadian Border Patrol enforces a law requiring
    Canadians to download what is essentially privacy-violating application
    onto smart phones with lots of personal details including medical
    records. If they don't, there's a $6,000 fine imposed including against
    children.

    Numerous Amish found they had liens imposed against their farms.
    Obviously they don't use smart phones.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scrtSExvu3g

    Just to be completely accurate, the agency that is charged with guarding
    our border is the Canadian Border Services Agency, not the Canadian
    Border Patrol. But even most Canadians probably don't know the proper
    name so I won't hold that against you ;-)

    As for this app that you are supposedly required to have, I've never
    heard of it and definitely don't have it on *my* smart phone. I've lived
    here all my life so if it really *is* mandatory, it is only mandatory
    for specific people or classes of people. It may well be for frequent >border-crossers. (I haven't crossed the border to the US in 20+ years.)

    Well, the name gives it away, ArriveCan. It's only applicable if you
    are crossing the border. There is no fine associated with not using it
    from what I can tell as it's only used to help people submit the
    necessary documentation for crossing the border electronically so your
    border crossing can go faster.

    That said it's possible that during the COVID crisis back in 2020 they
    may have wanted to use the app to help track people crossing into the
    country. Ah, here is an article that talks about 190 fines being
    issued for people who refused to provide their COVID-19 vaccination information, but not for refusing to use the ArriveCan app. As the
    article points out the people being fined refused to provide the
    required info even by a paper submission, which is allowed.

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/public-health-agency-of-canada-arrivecan-app-house-of-commons-committee-1.6556525


    So if the Amish were being fined it's because they were refusing to
    provide the information the government wanted to cross into the
    country including information on COVID-19 vaccination status. Not for
    refusing to use some app.

    I know there's a system called Nexus that has some documentation
    requirements which apparently puts you in a much shorter line at border >crossing points so that may be what the video is talking about. But you
    can still cross without Nexus, or so I was told by a former colleague
    who frequently crossed the border. You just have to deal with a much
    longer line and can expect to wait several hours at times.

    [Pause]

    Okay, I just watched the video and they're talking about ArriveCan, not >Nexus. ArriveCan was an app the Liberals had built during Covid. They
    paid many millions of dollars to get a consulting firm to build it as a
    way to track people coming into the country but it subsequently came out
    that two people built it in a single weekend so they must have paid >themselves very handsomely indeed - or kicked a lot of it back to some >Liberal slush fund. (It must be a mess too because it takes considerably >longer to build a robust and thoroughly tested app than a single
    weekend. You might be able to build a simple UNTESTED app in that time
    if you're a skilled developer but writing and running all the tests >successfully is almost unimagineable. You can't even DESIGN an app that
    fast unless it is EXTREMELY trivial, let alone build and test it.) There
    was a *lot* of talk about ArriveCan in the news during Covid and believe
    me, it was not people praising it or the government.

    I haven't heard about it in a while now so assumed it was no longer
    required but I just found the ArriveCan web page, which was last updated
    in September 2024, and it looks like the app is still around! I had
    thought it was no longer required since we got past Covid but I guess
    it's just fallen off the news radar....

    As for the Amish, yes, they were indeed screwed by ArriveCan and
    presumably continue to be screwed unless they've all acquired smart
    phones since this app was launched. But if the Liberals did that to the >Amish, I feel sure they did it to others too. Ezra Levant really should
    have done a Freedom of Information request to find out who else had this >happen to them. Rebel News is no stranger to FOI requests, although the >Liberals amended the FOI rules to give the bureaucrats MUCH more time to >produce the documents; I believe they also gave them more latitude to
    redact information so it may not be possible to get much more than
    blackened pages at this point.

    Then again, maybe the Liberals really ARE that evil and deliberately
    picked on the Amish alone knowing that the Amish would endure it without >making a ruckus.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 24 17:39:54 2025
    On Mar 24, 2025 at 3:30:06 AM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    On 2025-03-24 2:07 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    According to this video, Canadian Border Patrol enforces a law requiring
    Canadians to download what is essentially privacy-violating application
    onto smart phones with lots of personal details including medical
    records. If they don't, there's a $6,000 fine imposed including against
    children.

    Numerous Amish found they had liens imposed against their farms.
    Obviously they don't use smart phones.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scrtSExvu3g

    Just to be completely accurate, the agency that is charged with guarding
    our border is the Canadian Border Services Agency, not the Canadian
    Border Patrol. But even most Canadians probably don't know the proper
    name so I won't hold that against you ;-)

    As for this app that you are supposedly required to have, I've never
    heard of it and definitely don't have it on *my* smart phone. I've lived
    here all my life so if it really *is* mandatory, it is only mandatory
    for specific people or classes of people. It may well be for frequent border-crossers. (I haven't crossed the border to the US in 20+ years.)

    I know there's a system called Nexus that has some documentation
    requirements which apparently puts you in a much shorter line at border crossing points so that may be what the video is talking about. But you
    can still cross without Nexus, or so I was told by a former colleague
    who frequently crossed the border. You just have to deal with a much
    longer line and can expect to wait several hours at times.

    [Pause]

    Okay, I just watched the video and they're talking about ArriveCan, not Nexus. ArriveCan was an app the Liberals had built during Covid. They
    paid many millions of dollars to get a consulting firm to build it as a
    way to track people coming into the country but it subsequently came out
    that two people built it in a single weekend so they must have paid themselves very handsomely indeed - or kicked a lot of it back to some Liberal slush fund. (It must be a mess too because it takes considerably longer to build a robust and thoroughly tested app than a single
    weekend. You might be able to build a simple UNTESTED app in that time
    if you're a skilled developer but writing and running all the tests successfully is almost unimagineable. You can't even DESIGN an app that
    fast unless it is EXTREMELY trivial, let alone build and test it.) There
    was a *lot* of talk about ArriveCan in the news during Covid and believe
    me, it was not people praising it or the government.

    I downloaded when I was thinking about driving from L.A. to Anchorage in case
    I had to pass through Canadia at some point and it is incredibly intrusive in what information it requires you to give them.

    The arrival of Midnight in my household has so far put that trip on hold, however, so I never actually had to use the app.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 24 21:09:32 2025
    On 2025-03-24 1:39 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Mar 24, 2025 at 3:30:06 AM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    On 2025-03-24 2:07 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    According to this video, Canadian Border Patrol enforces a law requiring >>> Canadians to download what is essentially privacy-violating application >>> onto smart phones with lots of personal details including medical
    records. If they don't, there's a $6,000 fine imposed including against >>> children.

    Numerous Amish found they had liens imposed against their farms.
    Obviously they don't use smart phones.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scrtSExvu3g

    Just to be completely accurate, the agency that is charged with guarding
    our border is the Canadian Border Services Agency, not the Canadian
    Border Patrol. But even most Canadians probably don't know the proper
    name so I won't hold that against you ;-)

    As for this app that you are supposedly required to have, I've never
    heard of it and definitely don't have it on *my* smart phone. I've lived
    here all my life so if it really *is* mandatory, it is only mandatory
    for specific people or classes of people. It may well be for frequent
    border-crossers. (I haven't crossed the border to the US in 20+ years.)

    I know there's a system called Nexus that has some documentation
    requirements which apparently puts you in a much shorter line at border
    crossing points so that may be what the video is talking about. But you
    can still cross without Nexus, or so I was told by a former colleague
    who frequently crossed the border. You just have to deal with a much
    longer line and can expect to wait several hours at times.

    [Pause]

    Okay, I just watched the video and they're talking about ArriveCan, not
    Nexus. ArriveCan was an app the Liberals had built during Covid. They
    paid many millions of dollars to get a consulting firm to build it as a
    way to track people coming into the country but it subsequently came out
    that two people built it in a single weekend so they must have paid
    themselves very handsomely indeed - or kicked a lot of it back to some
    Liberal slush fund. (It must be a mess too because it takes considerably
    longer to build a robust and thoroughly tested app than a single
    weekend. You might be able to build a simple UNTESTED app in that time
    if you're a skilled developer but writing and running all the tests
    successfully is almost unimagineable. You can't even DESIGN an app that
    fast unless it is EXTREMELY trivial, let alone build and test it.) There
    was a *lot* of talk about ArriveCan in the news during Covid and believe
    me, it was not people praising it or the government.

    I downloaded when I was thinking about driving from L.A. to Anchorage in case I had to pass through Canadia at some point and it is incredibly intrusive in what information it requires you to give them.

    The arrival of Midnight in my household has so far put that trip on hold, however, so I never actually had to use the app.


    Have you ever considered taking Midnight with you on your trip? I'm not
    saying you should but a friend of mine did it once on a trip from
    London, Ontario out to Calgary, Alberta with her Maine coon cat and said
    it went much better than she expected. She said the first four or five
    hours were difficult but they were driving in heavy traffic when it was
    raining hard and the water splashing up on the car from the passing cars
    may have terrified the cat. But five hours out of a three or four day
    trip isn't that bad. She managed to find motels that accepted pets
    easily enough - I didn't know there were such things - and also said she
    never lost the cat once when they stopped at roadsides to answer
    nature's call.

    I was quite surprised at the whole idea of travelling with a cat but she
    made it seem feasible. I should make clear that she was travelling
    alone: just her and the cat.

    As for the ArriveCan app being intrusive, I'm not terribly surprised. I
    think the bureaucrat's default inclination - at least in this country -
    is to get as much information as possible and only reduce the
    requirements when they get too much pushback. They probably think the
    average person is just going to be docile and give them whatever they
    ask for so why not go for the maximum information, even if it's more
    than they need. If *I* was designing these things, I'd ask for the
    absolute bare minimum of information but that's just me.

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tye syding@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 25 00:18:02 2025
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scrtSExvu3g


    I hear they round them up and deport them to Mexico but their horses are made into glue

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 25 02:48:01 2025
    On Mar 24, 2025 at 6:09:32 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    On 2025-03-24 1:39 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Mar 24, 2025 at 3:30:06 AM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> >> wrote:

    On 2025-03-24 2:07 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    According to this video, Canadian Border Patrol enforces a law requiring
    Canadians to download what is essentially privacy-violating application >>>> onto smart phones with lots of personal details including medical
    records. If they don't, there's a $6,000 fine imposed including against >>>> children.

    Numerous Amish found they had liens imposed against their farms.
    Obviously they don't use smart phones.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scrtSExvu3g

    Just to be completely accurate, the agency that is charged with guarding >>> our border is the Canadian Border Services Agency, not the Canadian
    Border Patrol. But even most Canadians probably don't know the proper
    name so I won't hold that against you ;-)

    As for this app that you are supposedly required to have, I've never
    heard of it and definitely don't have it on *my* smart phone. I've lived >>> here all my life so if it really *is* mandatory, it is only mandatory
    for specific people or classes of people. It may well be for frequent
    border-crossers. (I haven't crossed the border to the US in 20+ years.) >>>
    I know there's a system called Nexus that has some documentation
    requirements which apparently puts you in a much shorter line at border >>> crossing points so that may be what the video is talking about. But you >>> can still cross without Nexus, or so I was told by a former colleague
    who frequently crossed the border. You just have to deal with a much
    longer line and can expect to wait several hours at times.

    [Pause]

    Okay, I just watched the video and they're talking about ArriveCan, not >>> Nexus. ArriveCan was an app the Liberals had built during Covid. They
    paid many millions of dollars to get a consulting firm to build it as a >>> way to track people coming into the country but it subsequently came out >>> that two people built it in a single weekend so they must have paid
    themselves very handsomely indeed - or kicked a lot of it back to some
    Liberal slush fund. (It must be a mess too because it takes considerably >>> longer to build a robust and thoroughly tested app than a single
    weekend. You might be able to build a simple UNTESTED app in that time
    if you're a skilled developer but writing and running all the tests
    successfully is almost unimagineable. You can't even DESIGN an app that >>> fast unless it is EXTREMELY trivial, let alone build and test it.) There >>> was a *lot* of talk about ArriveCan in the news during Covid and believe >>> me, it was not people praising it or the government.

    I downloaded when I was thinking about driving from L.A. to Anchorage in
    case
    I had to pass through Canadia at some point and it is incredibly intrusive >> in
    what information it requires you to give them.

    The arrival of Midnight in my household has so far put that trip on hold, >> however, so I never actually had to use the app.

    Have you ever considered taking Midnight with you on your trip? I'm not saying you should but a friend of mine did it once on a trip from
    London, Ontario out to Calgary, Alberta with her Maine coon cat and said
    it went much better than she expected. She said the first four or five
    hours were difficult but they were driving in heavy traffic when it was raining hard and the water splashing up on the car from the passing cars
    may have terrified the cat. But five hours out of a three or four day
    trip isn't that bad. She managed to find motels that accepted pets
    easily enough - I didn't know there were such things - and also said she never lost the cat once when they stopped at roadsides to answer
    nature's call.

    I drive with her back and forth to Texas for Christmas every year and she doesn't mind the car at all. After we get up to freeway speed, she just crawls under my seat and sleeps. She makes it five or six hours of driving with no need to stop to poop or pee. Most of the extended stay hotels (Marriott Courtyard, Fairfield Inn, etc.) all allow pets, so that's no problem. I set
    the litter box up first thing when we stop for the night at the hotel and fill her bowl with water and she makes a beeline right for them. Have never had any issues with accidents in the car.

    An Alaska trip is problematic, though, because a lot of it would be on the Marine Highway and I have no idea how several days on a boat would work with a cat. Would we have a cabin? Could I set up a litter box in it? If not where would she do her business? Do they even allow pets?

    There are so many logistical questions to deal with that it didn't seem worth it.

    I was quite surprised at the whole idea of travelling with a cat but she
    made it seem feasible. I should make clear that she was travelling
    alone: just her and the cat.

    As for the ArriveCan app being intrusive, I'm not terribly surprised. I
    think the bureaucrat's default inclination - at least in this country -
    is to get as much information as possible and only reduce the
    requirements when they get too much pushback. They probably think the
    average person is just going to be docile and give them whatever they
    ask for so why not go for the maximum information, even if it's more
    than they need. If *I* was designing these things, I'd ask for the
    absolute bare minimum of information but that's just me.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pluted Pup@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 31 22:13:14 2025
    On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 19:48:01 -0700, BTR1701 wrote:

    On Mar 24, 2025 at 6:09:32 PM PDT, "Rhino"<no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    On 2025-03-24 1:39 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Mar 24, 2025 at 3:30:06 AM PDT, "Rhino"<no_offline_contact@example.com>
    wrote:

    On 2025-03-24 2:07 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    According to this video, Canadian Border Patrol enforces a law requiring
    Canadians to download what is essentially privacy-violating application
    onto smart phones with lots of personal details including medical records. If they don't, there's a $6,000 fine imposed including against
    children.

    Numerous Amish found they had liens imposed against their farms. Obviously they don't use smart phones.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=scrtSExvu3g

    Just to be completely accurate, the agency that is charged with guarding
    our border is the Canadian Border Services Agency, not the Canadian Border Patrol. But even most Canadians probably don't know the proper name so I won't hold that against you ;-)

    As for this app that you are supposedly required to have, I've never heard of it and definitely don't have it on *my* smart phone. I've lived
    here all my life so if it really *is* mandatory, it is only mandatory for specific people or classes of people. It may well be for frequent border-crossers. (I haven't crossed the border to the US in 20+ years.)

    I know there's a system called Nexus that has some documentation requirements which apparently puts you in a much shorter line at border crossing points so that may be what the video is talking about. But you can still cross without Nexus, or so I was told by a former colleague who frequently crossed the border. You just have to deal with a much longer line and can expect to wait several hours at times.

    [Pause]

    Okay, I just watched the video and they're talking about ArriveCan, not Nexus. ArriveCan was an app the Liberals had built during Covid. They paid many millions of dollars to get a consulting firm to build it as a way to track people coming into the country but it subsequently came out
    that two people built it in a single weekend so they must have paid themselves very handsomely indeed - or kicked a lot of it back to some Liberal slush fund. (It must be a mess too because it takes considerably
    longer to build a robust and thoroughly tested app than a single weekend. You might be able to build a simple UNTESTED app in that time if you're a skilled developer but writing and running all the tests successfully is almost unimagineable. You can't even DESIGN an app that fast unless it is EXTREMELY trivial, let alone build and test it.) There
    was a *lot* of talk about ArriveCan in the news during Covid and believe
    me, it was not people praising it or the government.

    I downloaded when I was thinking about driving from L.A. to Anchorage in case
    I had to pass through Canadia at some point and it is incredibly intrusive
    in
    what information it requires you to give them.

    The arrival of Midnight in my household has so far put that trip on hold, however, so I never actually had to use the app.
    Have you ever considered taking Midnight with you on your trip? I'm not saying you should but a friend of mine did it once on a trip from
    London, Ontario out to Calgary, Alberta with her Maine coon cat and said
    it went much better than she expected. She said the first four or five hours were difficult but they were driving in heavy traffic when it was raining hard and the water splashing up on the car from the passing cars may have terrified the cat. But five hours out of a three or four day
    trip isn't that bad. She managed to find motels that accepted pets
    easily enough - I didn't know there were such things - and also said she never lost the cat once when they stopped at roadsides to answer
    nature's call.

    I drive with her back and forth to Texas for Christmas every year and she doesn't mind the car at all. After we get up to freeway speed, she just crawls
    under my seat and sleeps. She makes it five or six hours of driving with no need to stop to poop or pee.

    That's not OK, she needs a litter box, it can be needed
    at any time.

    Most of the extended stay hotels (Marriott
    Courtyard, Fairfield Inn, etc.) all allow pets, so that's no problem. I set the litter box up first thing when we stop for the night at the hotel and fill
    her bowl with water and she makes a beeline right for them. Have never had any
    issues with accidents in the car.

    An Alaska trip is problematic, though, because a lot of it would be on the Marine Highway and I have no idea how several days on a boat would work with a
    cat. Would we have a cabin? Could I set up a litter box in it? If not where would she do her business? Do they even allow pets?

    There are so many logistical questions to deal with that it didn't seem worth it.

    I was quite surprised at the whole idea of travelling with a cat but she made it seem feasible. I should make clear that she was travelling
    alone: just her and the cat.

    As for the ArriveCan app being intrusive, I'm not terribly surprised. I think the bureaucrat's default inclination - at least in this country -
    is to get as much information as possible and only reduce the
    requirements when they get too much pushback. They probably think the average person is just going to be docile and give them whatever they
    ask for so why not go for the maximum information, even if it's more
    than they need. If *I* was designing these things, I'd ask for the
    absolute bare minimum of information but that's just me.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)