• Chicago aldermen show guts

    From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 11 18:48:24 2025
    Dexter Reed was the lovely man in his mid 20s, with an arrest record,
    who was pulled over in what was likely a pretextual traffic stop and
    about to be a civil rights violation in the search of his vehicle. For
    reasons we'll never know, he panicked, pulled a gun and shot at police, striking one officer in the hand (who recovered). Police obviously shot
    back and killed him with multiple rounds in his body, plus a ridiculous
    number of rounds that went wide. As he lay on the, probably dead or
    still bleeding to death, one officer shot more rounds into him.

    It's unlikely that the stop could have been justified and any contraband
    found in the search of the vehicle and of his person, including the gun,
    would likely have been suppressed. He might have been able to sue for
    the civil rights violation.

    I haven't read if cops had identified him from the license plate or
    recognized him but he wasn't pulled over by the patrol officer. It was a
    task force of officers in three squad cars.

    All that being said, he had no justification to shoot. He's dead because
    he shot first.

    There was a $1.25 million settlement to the greedy relatives, er, the
    estate, but it was rejected by aldermen on the city council committee.

    Even though legal fees would be high, higher than the settlement, in my opinion, this needs to be fought and the city cannot afford to lose this.

    https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/04/11/city-council-1-25-million-settlement-dexter-reed-family/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)