The BlackBeltBarrister describes why the Supreme Court had to get
involved to end the confusion about "what is a woman". He also looks at
the consequences of their ruling and what companies and organizations
now need to do to comply with the law:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaWZTFnYhc8 [22 minutes]
Important footnote:
He talks about Gender Recognition Certificates (GRCs). These are
documents which people can acquire to get their official IDs changed to reflect their acquired gender but they are NOT trivial documents to
acquire. In order to get this document, you have to live as your
required gender for two years before applying AND satisfy a panel of
doctors that you have gender dysphoria. Apparently, the vast majority of trans-folk do NOT go through this and merely demand to be treated as
their new sex WITHOUT a GRC. The barrister discusses the impact of the
ruling on both people with and without a GRC.
On 4/18/2025 4:43 PM, Rhino wrote:
The BlackBeltBarrister describes why the Supreme Court had to get
involved to end the confusion about "what is a woman". He also looks
at the consequences of their ruling and what companies and
organizations now need to do to comply with the law:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaWZTFnYhc8 [22 minutes]
Important footnote:
He talks about Gender Recognition Certificates (GRCs). These are
documents which people can acquire to get their official IDs changed
to reflect their acquired gender but they are NOT trivial documents to
acquire. In order to get this document, you have to live as your
required gender for two years before applying AND satisfy a panel of
doctors that you have gender dysphoria. Apparently, the vast majority
of trans-folk do NOT go through this and merely demand to be treated
as their new sex WITHOUT a GRC. The barrister discusses the impact of
the ruling on both people with and without a GRC.
Inadvertently or not, the two-year wait may amount to an end-run around
the men-in-women's-sports controversy.
On 2025-04-18 5:34 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/18/2025 4:43 PM, Rhino wrote:You obviously didn't watch the video.
The BlackBeltBarrister describes why the Supreme Court had to get
involved to end the confusion about "what is a woman". He also looks
at the consequences of their ruling and what companies and
organizations now need to do to comply with the law:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaWZTFnYhc8 [22 minutes]
Important footnote:
He talks about Gender Recognition Certificates (GRCs). These are
documents which people can acquire to get their official IDs changed
to reflect their acquired gender but they are NOT trivial documents
to acquire. In order to get this document, you have to live as your
required gender for two years before applying AND satisfy a panel of
doctors that you have gender dysphoria. Apparently, the vast majority
of trans-folk do NOT go through this and merely demand to be treated
as their new sex WITHOUT a GRC. The barrister discusses the impact of
the ruling on both people with and without a GRC.
Inadvertently or not, the two-year wait may amount to an end-run
around the men-in-women's-sports controversy.
On 4/18/2025 6:11 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-04-18 5:34 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/18/2025 4:43 PM, Rhino wrote:You obviously didn't watch the video.
The BlackBeltBarrister describes why the Supreme Court had to get
involved to end the confusion about "what is a woman". He also looks
at the consequences of their ruling and what companies and
organizations now need to do to comply with the law:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaWZTFnYhc8 [22 minutes]
Important footnote:
He talks about Gender Recognition Certificates (GRCs). These are
documents which people can acquire to get their official IDs changed
to reflect their acquired gender but they are NOT trivial documents
to acquire. In order to get this document, you have to live as your
required gender for two years before applying AND satisfy a panel of
doctors that you have gender dysphoria. Apparently, the vast
majority of trans-folk do NOT go through this and merely demand to
be treated as their new sex WITHOUT a GRC. The barrister discusses
the impact of the ruling on both people with and without a GRC.
Inadvertently or not, the two-year wait may amount to an end-run
around the men-in-women's-sports controversy.
And, thus, I didn't comment on it.
On 2025-04-18 10:24 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/18/2025 6:11 PM, Rhino wrote:Yet you predicted how it might be used as if you had watched it.
On 2025-04-18 5:34 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 4/18/2025 4:43 PM, Rhino wrote:You obviously didn't watch the video.
The BlackBeltBarrister describes why the Supreme Court had to get
involved to end the confusion about "what is a woman". He also
looks at the consequences of their ruling and what companies and
organizations now need to do to comply with the law:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UaWZTFnYhc8 [22 minutes]
Important footnote:
He talks about Gender Recognition Certificates (GRCs). These are
documents which people can acquire to get their official IDs
changed to reflect their acquired gender but they are NOT trivial
documents to acquire. In order to get this document, you have to
live as your required gender for two years before applying AND
satisfy a panel of doctors that you have gender dysphoria.
Apparently, the vast majority of trans-folk do NOT go through this
and merely demand to be treated as their new sex WITHOUT a GRC. The
barrister discusses the impact of the ruling on both people with
and without a GRC.
Inadvertently or not, the two-year wait may amount to an end-run
around the men-in-women's-sports controversy.
And, thus, I didn't comment on it.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 18:34:22 |
| Calls: | 10,389 |
| Files: | 14,061 |
| Messages: | 6,416,956 |