Today the Senate revoked California’s EPA waiver which allows them to impose
stricter air quality regulations than the federal government. This basically torpedoes Gavvy Newsom's 2035 ban on gas-powered vehicles. He's spittin' mad and is vowing to sue. I have no idea on what basis he plans to sue. “California has a right, alone among all the states, to be exempt from federal
regulations.” Doesn’t sound like a winning case to me.
On 2025-05-22 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
Today the Senate revoked California’s EPA waiver which allows them to imposeI think we have a similar ban here, also set for 2035. The new PM, is a
stricter air quality regulations than the federal government. This basically
torpedoes Gavvy Newsom's 2035 ban on gas-powered vehicles. He's spittin' mad
and is vowing to sue. I have no idea on what basis he plans to sue.
“California has a right, alone among all the states, to be exempt from
federal
regulations.” Doesn’t sound like a winning case to me.
real eco-Nazi so I'm going to be shocked if he repeals it. The Liberal
Party in this country continues to be a clown show, even after replacing
the head clown....
On May 22, 2025 at 3:38:50 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
On 2025-05-22 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
Today the Senate revoked California’s EPA waiver which allows them to imposeI think we have a similar ban here, also set for 2035. The new PM, is a
stricter air quality regulations than the federal government. This basically
torpedoes Gavvy Newsom's 2035 ban on gas-powered vehicles. He's spittin' mad
and is vowing to sue. I have no idea on what basis he plans to sue.
“California has a right, alone among all the states, to be exempt from >>> federal
regulations.” Doesn’t sound like a winning case to me.
real eco-Nazi so I'm going to be shocked if he repeals it. The Liberal
Party in this country continues to be a clown show, even after replacing
the head clown....
The X-Twitters is full of hysterical leftists posting news items like the one above and asking Trump voters, "Is this what you voted for?" with the implication that most of them wouldn't have voted for Trump if they knew he would do this.
In almost every instance, I reply with "Yes, absolutely, and I'd vote for it again." Drives them nuts.
May 22, 2025 at 3:38:50 PM PDT, Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com>: >>2025-05-22 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
Today the Senate revoked California's EPA waiver which allows
them to impose stricter air quality regulations than the federal >>>government. This basically torpedoes Gavvy Newsom's 2035 ban on >>>gas-powered vehicles. He's spittin' mad and is vowing to sue. I have
no idea on what basis he plans to sue. "California has a right, alone >>>among all the states, to be exempt from federal regulations." Doesn't >>>sound like a winning case to me.
I think we have a similar ban here, also set for 2035. The new PM, is a >>real eco-Nazi so I'm going to be shocked if he repeals it. The Liberal >>Party in this country continues to be a clown show, even after replacing >>the head clown....
The X-Twitters is full of hysterical leftists posting news items like the one >above and asking Trump voters, "Is this what you voted for?" with the >implication that most of them wouldn't have voted for Trump if they knew he >would do this.
In almost every instance, I reply with "Yes, absolutely, and I'd vote for it >again." Drives them nuts.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
May 22, 2025 at 3:38:50 PM PDT, Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com>:
2025-05-22 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
Today the Senate revoked California's EPA waiver which allows
them to impose stricter air quality regulations than the federal
government. This basically torpedoes Gavvy Newsom's 2035 ban on
gas-powered vehicles. He's spittin' mad and is vowing to sue. I have
no idea on what basis he plans to sue. "California has a right, alone >>>> among all the states, to be exempt from federal regulations." Doesn't
sound like a winning case to me.
I think we have a similar ban here, also set for 2035. The new PM, is a
real eco-Nazi so I'm going to be shocked if he repeals it. The Liberal
Party in this country continues to be a clown show, even after replacing >>> the head clown....
The X-Twitters is full of hysterical leftists posting news items like the one
above and asking Trump voters, "Is this what you voted for?" with the
implication that most of them wouldn't have voted for Trump if they knew he >> would do this.
In almost every instance, I reply with "Yes, absolutely, and I'd vote for it >> again." Drives them nuts.
Trump just got US credit downgraded, which means even higher interest on
the national debt. Plus, at his urging, Congress will add $3.8 trillion
to the national debt. Plus, Trump's trade insanity is about to trigger a worldwide recession.
Did Trump voters vote for that?
On 2025-05-22 10:45 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
May 22, 2025 at 3:38:50 PM PDT, Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com>: >>>> 2025-05-22 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
Today the Senate revoked California's EPA waiver which allows
them to impose stricter air quality regulations than the federal
government. This basically torpedoes Gavvy Newsom's 2035 ban on
gas-powered vehicles. He's spittin' mad and is vowing to sue. I have >>>>> no idea on what basis he plans to sue. "California has a right, alone >>>>> among all the states, to be exempt from federal regulations." Doesn't >>>>> sound like a winning case to me.
I think we have a similar ban here, also set for 2035. The new PM, is a >>>> real eco-Nazi so I'm going to be shocked if he repeals it. The Liberal >>>> Party in this country continues to be a clown show, even after replacing >>>> the head clown....
The X-Twitters is full of hysterical leftists posting news items like the one
above and asking Trump voters, "Is this what you voted for?" with the
implication that most of them wouldn't have voted for Trump if they knew he >>> would do this.
In almost every instance, I reply with "Yes, absolutely, and I'd vote for it
again." Drives them nuts.
Trump just got US credit downgraded, which means even higher interest on
the national debt. Plus, at his urging, Congress will add $3.8 trillion
to the national debt. Plus, Trump's trade insanity is about to trigger a
worldwide recession.
Did Trump voters vote for that?
Presumably not. But he's describing his various actions as short-term
pain for long-term gain. I think the jury's still out on whether that is >wishful thinking or a visionary plan that might actually work.
Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
On 2025-05-22 10:45 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:like the one
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
May 22, 2025 at 3:38:50 PM PDT, Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com>: >>>>> 2025-05-22 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
Today the Senate revoked California's EPA waiver which allows
them to impose stricter air quality regulations than the federal
government. This basically torpedoes Gavvy Newsom's 2035 ban on
gas-powered vehicles. He's spittin' mad and is vowing to sue. I have >>>>>> no idea on what basis he plans to sue. "California has a right, alone >>>>>> among all the states, to be exempt from federal regulations." Doesn't >>>>>> sound like a winning case to me.
I think we have a similar ban here, also set for 2035. The new PM, is a >>>>> real eco-Nazi so I'm going to be shocked if he repeals it. The Liberal >>>>> Party in this country continues to be a clown show, even after replacing >>>>> the head clown....
The X-Twitters is full of hysterical leftists posting news items
above and asking Trump voters, "Is this what you voted for?" with the
implication that most of them wouldn't have voted for Trump if they knew he
would do this.
In almost every instance, I reply with "Yes, absolutely, and I'd vote for it
again." Drives them nuts.
Trump just got US credit downgraded, which means even higher interest on >>> the national debt. Plus, at his urging, Congress will add $3.8 trillion
to the national debt. Plus, Trump's trade insanity is about to trigger a >>> worldwide recession.
Did Trump voters vote for that?
Presumably not. But he's describing his various actions as short-term
pain for long-term gain. I think the jury's still out on whether that is >>wishful thinking or a visionary plan that might actually work.
Yeah. I'm kind of thinking of the sequence of international trade,
worldwide depression, then WWII. Let's avoid that.
Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
On 2025-05-22 10:45 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
May 22, 2025 at 3:38:50 PM PDT, Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com>: >>>>> 2025-05-22 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
Today the Senate revoked California's EPA waiver which allows
them to impose stricter air quality regulations than the federal
government. This basically torpedoes Gavvy Newsom's 2035 ban on
gas-powered vehicles. He's spittin' mad and is vowing to sue. I have >>>>>> no idea on what basis he plans to sue. "California has a right, alone >>>>>> among all the states, to be exempt from federal regulations." Doesn't >>>>>> sound like a winning case to me.
I think we have a similar ban here, also set for 2035. The new PM, is a >>>>> real eco-Nazi so I'm going to be shocked if he repeals it. The Liberal >>>>> Party in this country continues to be a clown show, even after replacing >>>>> the head clown....
The X-Twitters is full of hysterical leftists posting news items like the one
above and asking Trump voters, "Is this what you voted for?" with the
implication that most of them wouldn't have voted for Trump if they knew he
would do this.
In almost every instance, I reply with "Yes, absolutely, and I'd vote for it
again." Drives them nuts.
Trump just got US credit downgraded, which means even higher interest on >>> the national debt. Plus, at his urging, Congress will add $3.8 trillion
to the national debt. Plus, Trump's trade insanity is about to trigger a >>> worldwide recession.
Did Trump voters vote for that?
Presumably not. But he's describing his various actions as short-term
pain for long-term gain. I think the jury's still out on whether that is >>wishful thinking or a visionary plan that might actually work.
Yeah. I'm kind of thinking of the sequence of international trade,
worldwide depression, then WWII. Let's avoid that.
Today the Senate revoked Californias EPA waiver which allows them to impose >stricter air quality regulations than the federal government. This basically >torpedoes Gavvy Newsom's 2035 ban on gas-powered vehicles. He's spittin' mad >and is vowing to sue. I have no idea on what basis he plans to sue. >California has a right, alone among all the states, to be exempt from federal >regulations. Doesnt sound like a winning case to me.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
May 22, 2025 at 3:38:50 PM PDT, Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com>: >>>2025-05-22 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
Today the Senate revoked California's EPA waiver which allows
them to impose stricter air quality regulations than the federal >>>>government. This basically torpedoes Gavvy Newsom's 2035 ban on >>>>gas-powered vehicles. He's spittin' mad and is vowing to sue. I have
no idea on what basis he plans to sue. "California has a right, alone >>>>among all the states, to be exempt from federal regulations." Doesn't >>>>sound like a winning case to me.
I think we have a similar ban here, also set for 2035. The new PM, is a >>>real eco-Nazi so I'm going to be shocked if he repeals it. The Liberal >>>Party in this country continues to be a clown show, even after replacing >>>the head clown....
The X-Twitters is full of hysterical leftists posting news items like the one >>above and asking Trump voters, "Is this what you voted for?" with the >>implication that most of them wouldn't have voted for Trump if they knew he >>would do this.
In almost every instance, I reply with "Yes, absolutely, and I'd vote for it >>again." Drives them nuts.
Trump just got US credit downgraded, which means even higher interest on
the national debt. Plus, at his urging, Congress will add $3.8 trillion
to the national debt. Plus, Trump's trade insanity is about to trigger a >worldwide recession.
Did Trump voters vote for that?
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
On 2025-05-22 10:45 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:like the one
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
May 22, 2025 at 3:38:50 PM PDT, Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com>: >>>>>> 2025-05-22 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
Today the Senate revoked California's EPA waiver which allows
them to impose stricter air quality regulations than the federal >>>>>>> government. This basically torpedoes Gavvy Newsom's 2035 ban on
gas-powered vehicles. He's spittin' mad and is vowing to sue. I have >>>>>>> no idea on what basis he plans to sue. "California has a right, alone >>>>>>> among all the states, to be exempt from federal regulations." Doesn't >>>>>>> sound like a winning case to me.
I think we have a similar ban here, also set for 2035. The new PM, is a >>>>>> real eco-Nazi so I'm going to be shocked if he repeals it. The Liberal >>>>>> Party in this country continues to be a clown show, even after replacing >>>>>> the head clown....
The X-Twitters is full of hysterical leftists posting news items
above and asking Trump voters, "Is this what you voted for?" with the >>>>> implication that most of them wouldn't have voted for Trump if they knew he
would do this.
In almost every instance, I reply with "Yes, absolutely, and I'd vote for it
again." Drives them nuts.
Trump just got US credit downgraded, which means even higher interest on >>>> the national debt. Plus, at his urging, Congress will add $3.8 trillion >>>> to the national debt. Plus, Trump's trade insanity is about to trigger a >>>> worldwide recession.
Did Trump voters vote for that?
Presumably not. But he's describing his various actions as short-term >>>pain for long-term gain. I think the jury's still out on whether that is >>>wishful thinking or a visionary plan that might actually work.
Yeah. I'm kind of thinking of the sequence of international trade,
severe restrictions on international trade
worldwide depression, then WWII. Let's avoid that.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
May 22, 2025 at 3:38:50 PM PDT, Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com>:
2025-05-22 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
Today the Senate revoked California's EPA waiver which allows
them to impose stricter air quality regulations than the federal
government. This basically torpedoes Gavvy Newsom's 2035 ban on
gas-powered vehicles. He's spittin' mad and is vowing to sue. I have
no idea on what basis he plans to sue. "California has a right, alone >>>> among all the states, to be exempt from federal regulations." Doesn't
sound like a winning case to me.
I think we have a similar ban here, also set for 2035. The new PM, is a
real eco-Nazi so I'm going to be shocked if he repeals it. The Liberal
Party in this country continues to be a clown show, even after replacing >>> the head clown....
The X-Twitters is full of hysterical leftists posting news items like the one
above and asking Trump voters, "Is this what you voted for?" with the
implication that most of them wouldn't have voted for Trump if they knew he >> would do this.
In almost every instance, I reply with "Yes, absolutely, and I'd vote for it >> again." Drives them nuts.
Trump just got US credit downgraded, which means even higher interest on
the national debt. Plus, at his urging, Congress will add $3.8 trillion
to the national debt. Plus, Trump's trade insanity is about to trigger a worldwide recession.
Did Trump voters vote for that?
On Fri, 23 May 2025 03:18:28 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
On 2025-05-22 10:45 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
May 22, 2025 at 3:38:50 PM PDT, Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com>: >>>>>> 2025-05-22 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
Today the Senate revoked California's EPA waiver which allows
them to impose stricter air quality regulations than the federal >>>>>>> government. This basically torpedoes Gavvy Newsom's 2035 ban on
gas-powered vehicles. He's spittin' mad and is vowing to sue. I have >>>>>>> no idea on what basis he plans to sue. "California has a right, alone >>>>>>> among all the states, to be exempt from federal regulations." Doesn't >>>>>>> sound like a winning case to me.
I think we have a similar ban here, also set for 2035. The new PM, is a >>>>>> real eco-Nazi so I'm going to be shocked if he repeals it. The Liberal >>>>>> Party in this country continues to be a clown show, even after replacing >>>>>> the head clown....
The X-Twitters is full of hysterical leftists posting news items like the one
above and asking Trump voters, "Is this what you voted for?" with the >>>>> implication that most of them wouldn't have voted for Trump if they knew he
would do this.
In almost every instance, I reply with "Yes, absolutely, and I'd vote for it
again." Drives them nuts.
Trump just got US credit downgraded, which means even higher interest on >>>> the national debt. Plus, at his urging, Congress will add $3.8 trillion >>>> to the national debt. Plus, Trump's trade insanity is about to trigger a >>>> worldwide recession.
Did Trump voters vote for that?
Presumably not. But he's describing his various actions as short-term
pain for long-term gain. I think the jury's still out on whether that is >>> wishful thinking or a visionary plan that might actually work.
Yeah. I'm kind of thinking of the sequence of international trade,
worldwide depression, then WWII. Let's avoid that.
No, I think there's a contingent among the Trump voters that would
love a war. Not necessarily WWIII as that's going a bit overboard, but
a war with someone would help them sleep at night. As for a world wide depression doesn't that just mean an opportunity to buy goods,
businesses, land at cheap prices for those with the means? So that's a
good thing for the well off.
On Thu, 22 May 2025 20:49:31 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:
Today the Senate revoked Californias EPA waiver which allows them to impose
stricter air quality regulations than the federal government. This basically >> torpedoes Gavvy Newsom's 2035 ban on gas-powered vehicles. He's spittin' mad >> and is vowing to sue. I have no idea on what basis he plans to sue.
California has a right, alone among all the states, to be exempt from
federal
regulations. Doesnt sound like a winning case to me.
And California is suing.
On 5/22/2025 7:45 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
May 22, 2025 at 3:38:50 PM PDT, Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com>: >>>> 2025-05-22 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
Today the Senate revoked California's EPA waiver which allows
them to impose stricter air quality regulations than the federal
government. This basically torpedoes Gavvy Newsom's 2035 ban on
gas-powered vehicles. He's spittin' mad and is vowing to sue. I have >>>>> no idea on what basis he plans to sue. "California has a right, alone >>>>> among all the states, to be exempt from federal regulations." Doesn't >>>>> sound like a winning case to me.
I think we have a similar ban here, also set for 2035. The new PM, is a >>>> real eco-Nazi so I'm going to be shocked if he repeals it. The Liberal >>>> Party in this country continues to be a clown show, even after replacing >>>> the head clown....
The X-Twitters is full of hysterical leftists posting news items like the one
above and asking Trump voters, "Is this what you voted for?" with the
implication that most of them wouldn't have voted for Trump if they knew he >>> would do this.
In almost every instance, I reply with "Yes, absolutely, and I'd vote for it
again." Drives them nuts.
Trump just got US credit downgraded, which means even higher interest on
the national debt. Plus, at his urging, Congress will add $3.8 trillion
to the national debt. Plus, Trump's trade insanity is about to trigger a
worldwide recession.
Did Trump voters vote for that?
They voted for the things the Trump Party did that caused all that.
On 2025-05-22 10:45 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
May 22, 2025 at 3:38:50 PM PDT, Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com>: >>>> 2025-05-22 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
Today the Senate revoked California's EPA waiver which allows
them to impose stricter air quality regulations than the federal
government. This basically torpedoes Gavvy Newsom's 2035 ban on
gas-powered vehicles. He's spittin' mad and is vowing to sue. I have >>>>> no idea on what basis he plans to sue. "California has a right, alone >>>>> among all the states, to be exempt from federal regulations." Doesn't >>>>> sound like a winning case to me.
I think we have a similar ban here, also set for 2035. The new PM, is a >>>> real eco-Nazi so I'm going to be shocked if he repeals it. The Liberal >>>> Party in this country continues to be a clown show, even after
replacing
the head clown....
The X-Twitters is full of hysterical leftists posting news items like
the one
above and asking Trump voters, "Is this what you voted for?" with the
implication that most of them wouldn't have voted for Trump if they
knew he
would do this.
In almost every instance, I reply with "Yes, absolutely, and I'd vote
for it
again." Drives them nuts.
Trump just got US credit downgraded, which means even higher interest on
the national debt. Plus, at his urging, Congress will add $3.8 trillion
to the national debt. Plus, Trump's trade insanity is about to trigger a
worldwide recession.
Did Trump voters vote for that?
Presumably not. But he's describing his various actions as short-term
pain for long-term gain. I think the jury's still out on whether that is wishful thinking or a visionary plan that might actually work.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
2025-05-22 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
Today the Senate revoked California's EPA waiver which allows
them to impose stricter air quality regulations than the federal >>>>government. This basically torpedoes Gavvy Newsom's 2035 ban on >>>>gas-powered vehicles. He's spittin' mad and is vowing to sue. I have
no idea on what basis he plans to sue. "California has a right, alone >>>>among all the states, to be exempt from federal regulations." Doesn't >>>>sound like a winning case to me.
I think we have a similar ban here, also set for 2035. The new PM, is a >>>real eco-Nazi so I'm going to be shocked if he repeals it. The Liberal >>>Party in this country continues to be a clown show, even after replacing >>>the head clown....
The X-Twitters is full of hysterical leftists posting news items like the >>one above and asking Trump voters, "Is this what you voted for?" with the >>implication that most of them wouldn't have voted for Trump if they knew
he would do this.
In almost every instance, I reply with "Yes, absolutely, and I'd vote for >>it again." Drives them nuts.
Trump just got US credit downgraded, which means even higher interest on
the national debt. Plus, at his urging, Congress will add $3.8 trillion
to the national debt. Plus, Trump's trade insanity is about to trigger a >worldwide recession.
In article <100onfl$3otbn$3@dont-email.me>, ahk@chinet.com wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
2025-05-22 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
Today the Senate revoked California's EPA waiver which allows
them to impose stricter air quality regulations than the federal >>>>>government. This basically torpedoes Gavvy Newsom's 2035 ban on >>>>>gas-powered vehicles. He's spittin' mad and is vowing to sue. I have >>>>>no idea on what basis he plans to sue. "California has a right, alone >>>>>among all the states, to be exempt from federal regulations." Doesn't >>>>>sound like a winning case to me.
I think we have a similar ban here, also set for 2035. The new PM, is a >>>>real eco-Nazi so I'm going to be shocked if he repeals it. The Liberal >>>>Party in this country continues to be a clown show, even after replacing >>>>the head clown....
The X-Twitters is full of hysterical leftists posting news items like the >>>one above and asking Trump voters, "Is this what you voted for?" with the >>>implication that most of them wouldn't have voted for Trump if they knew >>>he would do this.
In almost every instance, I reply with "Yes, absolutely, and I'd vote for >>>it again." Drives them nuts.
Trump just got US credit downgraded, which means even higher interest on >>the national debt. Plus, at his urging, Congress will add $3.8 trillion
to the national debt. Plus, Trump's trade insanity is about to trigger a >>worldwide recession.
You do undersdtand that history did not begin when Trump was re-elected, >right?
[Kerman's incorrect formstting fixed.]
On 2025-05-22 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
Today the Senate revoked California's EPA waiver which allows them to
impose stricter air quality regulations than the federal government. This
basically torpedoes Gavvy Newsom's 2035 ban on gas-powered vehicles. He's
spittin' mad and is vowing to sue. I have no idea on what basis he plans
to sue. "California has a right, alone among all the states, to be exempt
from federal regulations.” Doesn't sound like a winning case to me.
I think we have a similar ban here, also set for 2035. The new PM, is a
real eco-Nazi so I'm going to be shocked if he repeals it. The Liberal
Party in this country continues to be a clown show, even after replacing
the head clown....
I think we have a similar ban here, also set for 2035. The new PM, is a >>real eco-Nazi so I'm going to be shocked if he repeals it. The Liberal >>Party in this country continues to be a clown show, even after replacing >>the head clown....
They do understand what happens to electric car batteries when it gets cold, >right?
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
I think we have a similar ban here, also set for 2035. The new PM, is a >>>real eco-Nazi so I'm going to be shocked if he repeals it. The Liberal >>>Party in this country continues to be a clown show, even after replacing >>>the head clown....
They do understand what happens to electric car batteries when it gets >>cold, right?
40 years ago I spent 4 years in Winnipeg which is proverbial for its
winters.
Wanna know why I know that -40C = -40F ??
lcraver@home.ca wrote:
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
I think we have a similar ban here, also set for 2035. The new PM, is a >>>>real eco-Nazi so I'm going to be shocked if he repeals it. The Liberal >>>>Party in this country continues to be a clown show, even after replacing >>>>the head clown....
They do understand what happens to electric car batteries when it gets >>>cold, right?
40 years ago I spent 4 years in Winnipeg which is proverbial for its >>winters.
Wanna know why I know that -40C = -40F ??
You did it algebraically?
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 12:29:57 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
wrote:
lcraver@home.ca wrote:
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
I think we have a similar ban here, also set for 2035. The new PM, is a >>>>> real eco-Nazi so I'm going to be shocked if he repeals it. The Liberal >>>>> Party in this country continues to be a clown show, even after replacing >>>>> the head clown....
They do understand what happens to electric car batteries when it gets >>>> cold, right?
40 years ago I spent 4 years in Winnipeg which is proverbial for its
winters.
Wanna know why I know that -40C = -40F ??
You did it algebraically?
Every Winnipegger knows that - it's well covered in winter weather
reports.
I was once in the Winnipeg public library on January where I was in
the public reading room (which is a great room including a very long
picture window) and reading a book on the German/Soviet campaign of
1941 that had an interesting feature - on the top corner of every page
had a date and temperature showing the temperature around Moscow
during the campaign.
I looked out the window and said "Hmmm. It's colder than that on the
opposite side of that window!"
(In those days any trip to Winnipeg airport any time other than
mid-winter meant you would see 100-200 German soldiers waiting for the
bus that would take them to CFB Shilo near Brandon, MB about 60 miles
W of Winnipeg for tank training - the point being Brandon is very flat
and has large areas of farmland in addition to the army base. The
Germans liked it a lot for tank training since there were far fewer
people than would have been in the same area in Germany)
On 6/14/2025 10:27 PM, The Horny Goat wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2025 12:29:57 -0400, Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
wrote:
lcraver@home.ca wrote:
Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
I think we have a similar ban here, also set for 2035. The new PM, is a >>>>>> real eco-Nazi so I'm going to be shocked if he repeals it. The Liberal >>>>>> Party in this country continues to be a clown show, even after replacing >>>>>> the head clown....
They do understand what happens to electric car batteries when it gets >>>>> cold, right?
40 years ago I spent 4 years in Winnipeg which is proverbial for its
winters.
Wanna know why I know that -40C = -40F ??
You did it algebraically?
Every Winnipegger knows that - it's well covered in winter weather
reports.
I was once in the Winnipeg public library on January where I was in
the public reading room (which is a great room including a very long
picture window) and reading a book on the German/Soviet campaign of
1941 that had an interesting feature - on the top corner of every page
had a date and temperature showing the temperature around Moscow
during the campaign.
I looked out the window and said "Hmmm. It's colder than that on the
opposite side of that window!"
(In those days any trip to Winnipeg airport any time other than
mid-winter meant you would see 100-200 German soldiers waiting for the
bus that would take them to CFB Shilo near Brandon, MB about 60 miles
W of Winnipeg for tank training - the point being Brandon is very flat
and has large areas of farmland in addition to the army base. The
Germans liked it a lot for tank training since there were far fewer
people than would have been in the same area in Germany)
Heh. I remember in the 80's the distance between towns in Germany was described as "one tactical nuke apart". Meaning that if you dropped a tac-nuke each on neighboring towns the blast/destruction radii would
just about meet.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 165:48:36 |
| Calls: | 10,385 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,057 |
| Messages: | 6,416,528 |