Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that schoolchildren in
Britain are being taught these days, including the preposterous lie that blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
On May 25, 2025 at 8:16:43 AM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that schoolchildren in
Britain are being taught these days, including the preposterous lie that
blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
I have no idea what they mean when they protest *in* Britain to 'decolonize' academic curriculum.
Britain was never a colony. They were the colonizers. I could understand if they were protesting in India or some African country that was colonized by Britain, or even here in America, which used to be British colonies. But how do you 'decolonize' Britain itself? It was never a colony in the first place. It's a logical oxymoron.
And how do they claim at the same time that:
(1) Historical Britons were black, and
(2) Britain stole all the wealth from Africa and India
If the second part is true, then what's their gripe with white people? They should be bitching about all those black Britons that stole the wealth of Africa.
Nevertheless, I posted about all this back in January:
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: The Extent of Anti-White Propaganda in British Schools
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 18:54:37 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <vmgtdd$12eos$1@dont-email.me>
This book claims that black people built Stonehenge.
https://ibb.co/Kzx6gMp
This might be amusing, were it not an award-winning book recommended for every
classroom across the UK.
Other claims made by the book:
--Black people have inhabited Britain (and all of Europe, for that matter, to include Scandinavia) for longer than whites and it was barbaric whites who stole it from them.
--It was a black Roman that introduced Christianity to Britain.
--Most Europeans, even its kings and queens, were devout Muslims. ("We wuz kangs and shit!")
--The Vikings worshipped Allah, not Odin or any of the other Norse gods.
--The book claims Africa at the time was a wonderland of various Wakanda-like societies with gleaming cities that were technologically far ahead of white Europeans. Yet despite being so advanced and powerful, they were somehow unable to keep the rapacious and barbaric whites from overrunning them, taking
everything the black Africans had, and leaving them all in poverty.
It cites "Cheddar Man", a 10,000-year-old skeleton found at the turn of the century in a cave in the Cheddar Gorge near Bristol, as proof that black people were native to Britain long before whites. Recently, scientists at the Natural History Museum in London ran DNA tests on the skeleton and announced that in life, the guy had blue eyes, curly black hair and "skin as dark as can
be".
However, when questioned as to how these determinations were made, the scientists involved in the testing and reconstruction of Cheddar Man admitted that their findings were directed by the administrative staff at the museum "to prevent native Britons from identifying with ancestral populations". In other words, they didn't want to give any scientific validation that nativist anti-immigration groups could use to support their cause. So they made up the 'fact' that this ancient man was black. The museum staff were quoted as saying, "Regardless of refutations of his black ancestry, once black Britons adopt Cheddar Man as part of their cultural identity, he will remain black thereafter, regardless of the actual science."
The book ends with a celebration of George Floyd and his sacrifice for the good of black people everywhere.
I guess it's true what they say: When a people are conquered, the victors get to rewrite history.
"Everything faded into mist. The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." --George Orwell
On 2025-05-25 2:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 8:16:43 AM PDT, "Rhino"Agreed: all of the claims made by the anti-whites are an flat-out lies.
<no_offline_contact@example.com>
wrote:
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that schoolchildren in
Britain are being taught these days, including the preposterous lie that >>> blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
I have no idea what they mean when they protest *in* Britain to
'decolonize'
academic curriculum.
Britain was never a colony. They were the colonizers. I could
understand if
they were protesting in India or some African country that was
colonized by
Britain, or even here in America, which used to be British colonies.
But how
do you 'decolonize' Britain itself? It was never a colony in the first
place.
It's a logical oxymoron.
And how do they claim at the same time that:
(1) Historical Britons were black, and
(2) Britain stole all the wealth from Africa and India
If the second part is true, then what's their gripe with white people?
They
should be bitching about all those black Britons that stole the wealth of
Africa.
Nevertheless, I posted about all this back in January:
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: The Extent of Anti-White Propaganda in British Schools
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 18:54:37 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <vmgtdd$12eos$1@dont-email.me>
This book claims that black people built Stonehenge.
https://ibb.co/Kzx6gMp
This might be amusing, were it not an award-winning book recommended
for every
classroom across the UK.
Other claims made by the book:
--Black people have inhabited Britain (and all of Europe, for that
matter, to
include Scandinavia) for longer than whites and it was barbaric whites
who
stole it from them.
--It was a black Roman that introduced Christianity to Britain.
--Most Europeans, even its kings and queens, were devout Muslims. ("We
wuz
kangs and shit!")
--The Vikings worshipped Allah, not Odin or any of the other Norse gods.
--The book claims Africa at the time was a wonderland of various
Wakanda-like
societies with gleaming cities that were technologically far ahead of
white
Europeans. Yet despite being so advanced and powerful, they were somehow
unable to keep the rapacious and barbaric whites from overrunning
them, taking
everything the black Africans had, and leaving them all in poverty.
It cites "Cheddar Man", a 10,000-year-old skeleton found at the turn
of the
century in a cave in the Cheddar Gorge near Bristol, as proof that black
people were native to Britain long before whites. Recently, scientists
at the
Natural History Museum in London ran DNA tests on the skeleton and
announced
that in life, the guy had blue eyes, curly black hair and "skin as
dark as can
be".
However, when questioned as to how these determinations were made, the
scientists involved in the testing and reconstruction of Cheddar Man
admitted
that their findings were directed by the administrative staff at the
museum
"to prevent native Britons from identifying with ancestral
populations". In
other words, they didn't want to give any scientific validation that
nativist
anti-immigration groups could use to support their cause. So they made
up the
'fact' that this ancient man was black. The museum staff were quoted as
saying, "Regardless of refutations of his black ancestry, once black
Britons
adopt Cheddar Man as part of their cultural identity, he will remain
black
thereafter, regardless of the actual science."
The book ends with a celebration of George Floyd and his sacrifice for
the
good of black people everywhere.
I guess it's true what they say: When a people are conquered, the
victors get
to rewrite history.
"Everything faded into mist. The past was erased, the erasure was
forgotten,
the lie became truth." --George Orwell
As such, they need to be removed from the history books so that kids are
NOT taught this nonsense, otherwise they'll grow up actually believing
it, making it that much harder to expunge in a future generation. There
will be a genuine danger that this nonsense will be accepted as fact
forever more.
On 5/25/2025 3:45 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 2:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 8:16:43 AM PDT, "Rhino"Agreed: all of the claims made by the anti-whites are an flat-out lies.
<no_offline_contact@example.com>
wrote:
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that schoolchildren in
Britain are being taught these days, including the preposterous lie that >>>> blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
I have no idea what they mean when they protest *in* Britain to
'decolonize' academic curriculum.
Britain was never a colony. They were the colonizers. I could
understand if
they were protesting in India or some African country that was
colonized by
Britain, or even here in America, which used to be British colonies.
But how
do you 'decolonize' Britain itself? It was never a colony in the first
place. It's a logical oxymoron.
And how do they claim at the same time that:
(1) Historical Britons were black, and
(2) Britain stole all the wealth from Africa and India
If the second part is true, then what's their gripe with white people?
They should be bitching about all those black Britons that stole the
wealth of
Africa.
As such, they need to be removed from the history books so that kids are
NOT taught this nonsense, otherwise they'll grow up actually believing
it, making it that much harder to expunge in a future generation. There
will be a genuine danger that this nonsense will be accepted as fact
forever more.
As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute arbiter
of Truth.
On May 25, 2025 at 12:56:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 5/25/2025 3:45 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 2:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 8:16:43 AM PDT, "Rhino"Agreed: all of the claims made by the anti-whites are an flat-out lies. >>> As such, they need to be removed from the history books so that kids are >>> NOT taught this nonsense, otherwise they'll grow up actually believing >>> it, making it that much harder to expunge in a future generation. There >>> will be a genuine danger that this nonsense will be accepted as fact
<no_offline_contact@example.com>
wrote:
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that schoolchildren in >>>>> Britain are being taught these days, including the preposterous lie that
blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
I have no idea what they mean when they protest *in* Britain to
'decolonize' academic curriculum.
Britain was never a colony. They were the colonizers. I could
understand if
they were protesting in India or some African country that was
colonized by
Britain, or even here in America, which used to be British colonies. >>>> But how
do you 'decolonize' Britain itself? It was never a colony in the first >>>> place. It's a logical oxymoron.
And how do they claim at the same time that:
(1) Historical Britons were black, and
(2) Britain stole all the wealth from Africa and India
If the second part is true, then what's their gripe with white people? >>>> They should be bitching about all those black Britons that stole the >>>> wealth of
Africa.
forever more.
As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute arbiter
of Truth.
There is with regard to the claim 'black people built Stonehenge', FFS.
On May 25, 2025 at 12:56:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 5/25/2025 3:45 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 2:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 8:16:43 AM PDT, "Rhino"Agreed: all of the claims made by the anti-whites are an flat-out lies. >>> As such, they need to be removed from the history books so that kids are >>> NOT taught this nonsense, otherwise they'll grow up actually believing >>> it, making it that much harder to expunge in a future generation. There >>> will be a genuine danger that this nonsense will be accepted as fact
<no_offline_contact@example.com>
wrote:
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that schoolchildren in >>>>> Britain are being taught these days, including the preposterous lie that
blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
I have no idea what they mean when they protest *in* Britain to
'decolonize' academic curriculum.
Britain was never a colony. They were the colonizers. I could
understand if
they were protesting in India or some African country that was
colonized by
Britain, or even here in America, which used to be British colonies. >>>> But how
do you 'decolonize' Britain itself? It was never a colony in the first >>>> place. It's a logical oxymoron.
And how do they claim at the same time that:
(1) Historical Britons were black, and
(2) Britain stole all the wealth from Africa and India
If the second part is true, then what's their gripe with white people? >>>> They should be bitching about all those black Britons that stole the >>>> wealth of
Africa.
forever more.
As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute arbiter
of Truth.
There is with regard to the claim 'black people built Stonehenge', FFS.
On 2025-05-25 4:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 12:56:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>Not in moviePig's world. On that planet, anything anyone says is at
wrote:
On 5/25/2025 3:45 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 2:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 8:16:43 AM PDT, "Rhino"Agreed: all of the claims made by the anti-whites are an flat-out
<no_offline_contact@example.com>
wrote:
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that schoolchildren in >>>>>> Britain are being taught these days, including the preposterous >>>>>> lie that
blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
I have no idea what they mean when they protest *in* Britain to
'decolonize' academic curriculum.
Britain was never a colony. They were the colonizers. I could
understand if
they were protesting in India or some African country that was
colonized by
Britain, or even here in America, which used to be British colonies. >>>>> But how
do you 'decolonize' Britain itself? It was never a colony in the
first
place. It's a logical oxymoron.
And how do they claim at the same time that:
(1) Historical Britons were black, and
(2) Britain stole all the wealth from Africa and India
If the second part is true, then what's their gripe with white
people?
They should be bitching about all those black Britons that stole the >>>>> wealth of
Africa.
lies.
As such, they need to be removed from the history books so that
kids are
NOT taught this nonsense, otherwise they'll grow up actually
believing
it, making it that much harder to expunge in a future generation.
There
will be a genuine danger that this nonsense will be accepted as fact >>>> forever more.
As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute arbiter
of Truth.
There is with regard to the claim 'black people built Stonehenge', FFS.
least possibly true and, apparently, nothing can be disproved because
any evidence you can produce is always disputable.
On 5/25/2025 4:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 12:56:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 5/25/2025 3:45 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 2:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 8:16:43 AM PDT, "Rhino"Agreed: all of the claims made by the anti-whites are an flat-out
<no_offline_contact@example.com>
wrote:
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that schoolchildren in >>>>>> Britain are being taught these days, including the preposterous >>>>>> lie that
blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
I have no idea what they mean when they protest *in* Britain to
'decolonize' academic curriculum.
Britain was never a colony. They were the colonizers. I could
understand if
they were protesting in India or some African country that was
colonized by
Britain, or even here in America, which used to be British colonies. >>>>> But how
do you 'decolonize' Britain itself? It was never a colony in the
first
place. It's a logical oxymoron.
And how do they claim at the same time that:
(1) Historical Britons were black, and
(2) Britain stole all the wealth from Africa and India
If the second part is true, then what's their gripe with white
people?
They should be bitching about all those black Britons that stole the >>>>> wealth of
Africa.
lies.
As such, they need to be removed from the history books so that
kids are
NOT taught this nonsense, otherwise they'll grow up actually
believing
it, making it that much harder to expunge in a future generation.
There
will be a genuine danger that this nonsense will be accepted as fact >>>> forever more.
As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute arbiter
of Truth.
There is with regard to the claim 'black people built Stonehenge', FFS.
If 'history books' were acknowledged to comprise merely a *predominant*
view of past events, then they could rationally reject any absurdities.
But real-world claims of 'unassailable truth' are never sustainable.
E.g,, I'm guessing the blackHenge crowd have documents, too...
On 5/25/2025 5:24 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 4:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 12:56:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>Not in moviePig's world. On that planet, anything anyone says is at
wrote:
On 5/25/2025 3:45 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 2:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 8:16:43 AM PDT, "Rhino"Agreed: all of the claims made by the anti-whites are an flat-out >>>>> lies.
<no_offline_contact@example.com>
wrote:
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that
schoolchildren in
Britain are being taught these days, including the preposterous >>>>>>> lie that
blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
I have no idea what they mean when they protest *in* Britain to >>>>>> 'decolonize' academic curriculum.
Britain was never a colony. They were the colonizers. I could
understand if
they were protesting in India or some African country that was
colonized by
Britain, or even here in America, which used to be British
colonies.
But how
do you 'decolonize' Britain itself? It was never a colony in the >>>>>> first
place. It's a logical oxymoron.
And how do they claim at the same time that:
(1) Historical Britons were black, and
(2) Britain stole all the wealth from Africa and India
If the second part is true, then what's their gripe with white
people?
They should be bitching about all those black Britons that stole >>>>>> the
wealth of
Africa.
As such, they need to be removed from the history books so that
kids are
NOT taught this nonsense, otherwise they'll grow up actually
believing
it, making it that much harder to expunge in a future generation. >>>>> There
will be a genuine danger that this nonsense will be accepted as fact >>>>> forever more.
As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute arbiter >>>> of Truth.
There is with regard to the claim 'black people built Stonehenge', FFS.
least possibly true and, apparently, nothing can be disproved because
any evidence you can produce is always disputable.
Whereas, in Rhino World, "facts" are decided by 'plain common sense'?
On 2025-05-25 5:38 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 5/25/2025 5:24 PM, Rhino wrote:A world view based on common sense is a hell of a lot better than the absurdist world you create when you base everything on wishful thinking.
On 2025-05-25 4:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 12:56:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>Not in moviePig's world. On that planet, anything anyone says is at
wrote:
On 5/25/2025 3:45 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 2:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 8:16:43 AM PDT, "Rhino"Agreed: all of the claims made by the anti-whites are an flat-
<no_offline_contact@example.com>
wrote:
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that
schoolchildren in
Britain are being taught these days, including the
preposterous lie that
blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
I have no idea what they mean when they protest *in* Britain to >>>>>>> 'decolonize' academic curriculum.
Britain was never a colony. They were the colonizers. I could >>>>>>> understand if
they were protesting in India or some African country that was >>>>>>> colonized by
Britain, or even here in America, which used to be British
colonies.
But how
do you 'decolonize' Britain itself? It was never a colony in
the first
place. It's a logical oxymoron.
And how do they claim at the same time that:
(1) Historical Britons were black, and
(2) Britain stole all the wealth from Africa and India
If the second part is true, then what's their gripe with white >>>>>>> people?
They should be bitching about all those black Britons that
stole the
wealth of
Africa.
out lies.
As such, they need to be removed from the history books so that >>>>>> kids are
NOT taught this nonsense, otherwise they'll grow up actually
believing
it, making it that much harder to expunge in a future
generation. There
will be a genuine danger that this nonsense will be accepted as >>>>>> fact
forever more.
As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute arbiter >>>>> of Truth.
There is with regard to the claim 'black people built Stonehenge', FFS. >>>>
least possibly true and, apparently, nothing can be disproved because
any evidence you can produce is always disputable.
Whereas, in Rhino World, "facts" are decided by 'plain common sense'?
We've seen that all around us for the last decade or two as men decided
that they were women - or cats or spirit creatures - just because they
wanted to be and our legislators enshrined that in law with criminal penalties for disputing the claims of these fantasists.
On 2025-05-25 5:32 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 5/25/2025 4:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Do you know when Stonehenge was built? Do you have any idea how many
On May 25, 2025 at 12:56:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 5/25/2025 3:45 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 2:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 8:16:43 AM PDT, "Rhino"Agreed: all of the claims made by the anti-whites are an flat-out >>>>> lies.
<no_offline_contact@example.com>
wrote:
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that
schoolchildren in
Britain are being taught these days, including the preposterous >>>>>>> lie that
blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
I have no idea what they mean when they protest *in* Britain to >>>>>> 'decolonize' academic curriculum.
Britain was never a colony. They were the colonizers. I could
understand if
they were protesting in India or some African country that was
colonized by
Britain, or even here in America, which used to be British
colonies.
But how
do you 'decolonize' Britain itself? It was never a colony in the >>>>>> first
place. It's a logical oxymoron.
And how do they claim at the same time that:
(1) Historical Britons were black, and
(2) Britain stole all the wealth from Africa and India
If the second part is true, then what's their gripe with white
people?
They should be bitching about all those black Britons that stole >>>>>> the
wealth of
Africa.
As such, they need to be removed from the history books so that
kids are
NOT taught this nonsense, otherwise they'll grow up actually
believing
it, making it that much harder to expunge in a future generation. >>>>> There
will be a genuine danger that this nonsense will be accepted as fact >>>>> forever more.
As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute arbiter >>>> of Truth.
There is with regard to the claim 'black people built Stonehenge', FFS.
If 'history books' were acknowledged to comprise merely a
*predominant* view of past events, then they could rationally reject
any absurdities. But real-world claims of 'unassailable truth' are
never sustainable. E.g,, I'm guessing the blackHenge crowd have
documents, too...
people in that time and place were literate enough to create documents?
Did they even have a written language that long ago? And that's assuming
they had paper and ink to make records in the first place. Or are you of
the mind that they chiseled these records into clay tablets? If so, do
you have any reason to believe they knew how to do that?
Are you COMPLETELY clueless? Don't you understand that this claim of
black builders of Stonehenge is just a game of cultural appropriation by "activists"? They want to feel like blacks were significant going back
to the earliest days of the country so they're simply claiming to have
been a major part of things all the way along.
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that schoolchildren in
Britain are being taught these days, including the preposterous lie that blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that schoolchildren in
Britain are being taught these days, including the preposterous lie that
blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
We don’t know for sure when or how or why it was built, but we do know the color of the skin of the builders.
Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:Gray.
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that schoolchildren in
Britain are being taught these days, including the preposterous lie that
blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
We don’t know for sure when or how or why it was built, but we do know the >color of the skin of the builders.
On 5/25/2025 5:48 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 5:38 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 5/25/2025 5:24 PM, Rhino wrote:A world view based on common sense is a hell of a lot better than the
On 2025-05-25 4:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 12:56:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>Not in moviePig's world. On that planet, anything anyone says is at
wrote:
On 5/25/2025 3:45 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 2:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 8:16:43 AM PDT, "Rhino"Agreed: all of the claims made by the anti-whites are an flat- >>>>>>> out lies.
<no_offline_contact@example.com>
wrote:
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that
schoolchildren in
Britain are being taught these days, including the
preposterous lie that
blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
I have no idea what they mean when they protest *in* Britain to >>>>>>>> 'decolonize' academic curriculum.
Britain was never a colony. They were the colonizers. I could >>>>>>>> understand if
they were protesting in India or some African country that was >>>>>>>> colonized by
Britain, or even here in America, which used to be British
colonies.
But how
do you 'decolonize' Britain itself? It was never a colony in >>>>>>>> the first
place. It's a logical oxymoron.
And how do they claim at the same time that:
(1) Historical Britons were black, and
(2) Britain stole all the wealth from Africa and India
If the second part is true, then what's their gripe with white >>>>>>>> people?
They should be bitching about all those black Britons that
stole the
wealth of
Africa.
As such, they need to be removed from the history books so that >>>>>>> kids are
NOT taught this nonsense, otherwise they'll grow up actually
believing
it, making it that much harder to expunge in a future
generation. There
will be a genuine danger that this nonsense will be accepted as >>>>>>> fact
forever more.
As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute
arbiter
of Truth.
There is with regard to the claim 'black people built Stonehenge',
FFS.
least possibly true and, apparently, nothing can be disproved
because any evidence you can produce is always disputable.
Whereas, in Rhino World, "facts" are decided by 'plain common sense'?
absurdist world you create when you base everything on wishful thinking.
We've seen that all around us for the last decade or two as men
decided that they were women - or cats or spirit creatures - just
because they wanted to be and our legislators enshrined that in law
with criminal penalties for disputing the claims of these fantasists.
But you're not talking about a *personal* world view, you're writing legislation.
In your example, you're drawing a clear line between males
and females ...though Nature herself doesn't. Moreover, you're doing it with animosity, to punish some people who are already quite fucked up.
On 5/25/2025 5:44 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 5:32 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 5/25/2025 4:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Do you know when Stonehenge was built? Do you have any idea how many
On May 25, 2025 at 12:56:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>If 'history books' were acknowledged to comprise merely a
wrote:
On 5/25/2025 3:45 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 2:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 8:16:43 AM PDT, "Rhino"Agreed: all of the claims made by the anti-whites are an flat-
<no_offline_contact@example.com>
wrote:
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that
schoolchildren in
Britain are being taught these days, including the
preposterous lie that
blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
I have no idea what they mean when they protest *in* Britain to >>>>>>> 'decolonize' academic curriculum.
Britain was never a colony. They were the colonizers. I could >>>>>>> understand if
they were protesting in India or some African country that was >>>>>>> colonized by
Britain, or even here in America, which used to be British
colonies.
But how
do you 'decolonize' Britain itself? It was never a colony in
the first
place. It's a logical oxymoron.
And how do they claim at the same time that:
(1) Historical Britons were black, and
(2) Britain stole all the wealth from Africa and India
If the second part is true, then what's their gripe with white >>>>>>> people?
They should be bitching about all those black Britons that
stole the
wealth of
Africa.
out lies.
As such, they need to be removed from the history books so that >>>>>> kids are
NOT taught this nonsense, otherwise they'll grow up actually
believing
it, making it that much harder to expunge in a future
generation. There
will be a genuine danger that this nonsense will be accepted as >>>>>> fact
forever more.
As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute arbiter >>>>> of Truth.
There is with regard to the claim 'black people built Stonehenge', FFS. >>>
*predominant* view of past events, then they could rationally reject
any absurdities. But real-world claims of 'unassailable truth' are
never sustainable. E.g,, I'm guessing the blackHenge crowd have
documents, too...
people in that time and place were literate enough to create
documents? Did they even have a written language that long ago? And
that's assuming they had paper and ink to make records in the first
place. Or are you of the mind that they chiseled these records into
clay tablets? If so, do you have any reason to believe they knew how
to do that?
Are you COMPLETELY clueless? Don't you understand that this claim of
black builders of Stonehenge is just a game of cultural appropriation
by "activists"? They want to feel like blacks were significant going
back to the earliest days of the country so they're simply claiming to
have been a major part of things all the way along.
I'm not disputing longstanding accounts of Stonehenge
...especially
since the recent challenges do have a rather blatant p.c. aspect. I'm suggesting we should question our blithe acceptance of "history".
Did
you know that Texas classrooms are to display the Ten Commandments,
justified because they're an historical part of our democracy?
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:31:05 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
wrote:
Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:Gray.
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that schoolchildren in
Britain are being taught these days, including the preposterous lie that >>> blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
We don’t know for sure when or how or why it was built, but we do know the >> color of the skin of the builders.
We know that Stonehenge was built by the little gray aliens.
On 2025-05-25 6:29 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 5/25/2025 5:44 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 5:32 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 5/25/2025 4:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Do you know when Stonehenge was built? Do you have any idea how many
On May 25, 2025 at 12:56:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>If 'history books' were acknowledged to comprise merely a
wrote:
On 5/25/2025 3:45 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 2:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 8:16:43 AM PDT, "Rhino"Agreed: all of the claims made by the anti-whites are an flat- >>>>>>> out lies.
<no_offline_contact@example.com>
wrote:
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that
schoolchildren in
Britain are being taught these days, including the
preposterous lie that
blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
I have no idea what they mean when they protest *in* Britain to >>>>>>>> 'decolonize' academic curriculum.
Britain was never a colony. They were the colonizers. I could >>>>>>>> understand if
they were protesting in India or some African country that was >>>>>>>> colonized by
Britain, or even here in America, which used to be British
colonies.
But how
do you 'decolonize' Britain itself? It was never a colony in >>>>>>>> the first
place. It's a logical oxymoron.
And how do they claim at the same time that:
(1) Historical Britons were black, and
(2) Britain stole all the wealth from Africa and India
If the second part is true, then what's their gripe with white >>>>>>>> people?
They should be bitching about all those black Britons that
stole the
wealth of
Africa.
As such, they need to be removed from the history books so that >>>>>>> kids are
NOT taught this nonsense, otherwise they'll grow up actually
believing
it, making it that much harder to expunge in a future
generation. There
will be a genuine danger that this nonsense will be accepted as >>>>>>> fact
forever more.
As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute arbiter >>>>>> of Truth.
There is with regard to the claim 'black people built Stonehenge', FFS. >>>>
*predominant* view of past events, then they could rationally reject
any absurdities. But real-world claims of 'unassailable truth' are
never sustainable. E.g,, I'm guessing the blackHenge crowd have
documents, too...
people in that time and place were literate enough to create
documents? Did they even have a written language that long ago? And
that's assuming they had paper and ink to make records in the first
place. Or are you of the mind that they chiseled these records into
clay tablets? If so, do you have any reason to believe they knew how
to do that?
Are you COMPLETELY clueless? Don't you understand that this claim of
black builders of Stonehenge is just a game of cultural appropriation
by "activists"? They want to feel like blacks were significant going
back to the earliest days of the country so they're simply claiming to
have been a major part of things all the way along.
I'm not disputing longstanding accounts of Stonehenge
You're not? Then why did you suggest the possibility of documentary
evidence supporting the idea that Stonehenge was built by blacks at a
time and place when it was extremely unlikely that a written language
even existed, let alone the means to record that written language?
...especially
since the recent challenges do have a rather blatant p.c. aspect. I'm
suggesting we should question our blithe acceptance of "history".
I have no idea what you are saying.
DidYes, I saw a headline to that effect. As far as the Ten Commandments
you know that Texas classrooms are to display the Ten Commandments,
justified because they're an historical part of our democracy?
being part of history, that is obviously true. There's also a reasonable >argument that the Ten Commandments were a basic set of laws that
informed later laws like the ones governing our respective countries and
the state of Texas. You're apparently clutching your pearls at the
thought of them being on the wall. Why?
On 5/25/2025 4:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 12:56:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>
On 5/25/2025 3:45 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 2:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 8:16:43 AM PDT, "Rhino"Agreed: all of the claims made by the anti-whites are an flat-out lies. >>>> As such, they need to be removed from the history books so that kids are
<no_offline_contact@example.com>
wrote:
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that schoolchildren in >>>>>> Britain are being taught these days, including the preposterous lie that
blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
I have no idea what they mean when they protest *in* Britain to
'decolonize' academic curriculum.
Britain was never a colony. They were the colonizers. I could
understand if
they were protesting in India or some African country that was
colonized by
Britain, or even here in America, which used to be British colonies. >>>>> But how
do you 'decolonize' Britain itself? It was never a colony in the first >>>>> place. It's a logical oxymoron.
And how do they claim at the same time that:
(1) Historical Britons were black, and
(2) Britain stole all the wealth from Africa and India
If the second part is true, then what's their gripe with white people? >>>>> They should be bitching about all those black Britons that stole the >>>>> wealth of Africa.
NOT taught this nonsense, otherwise they'll grow up actually believing >>>> it, making it that much harder to expunge in a future generation. There >>>> will be a genuine danger that this nonsense will be accepted as fact >>>> forever more.
As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute arbiter
of Truth.
There is with regard to the claim 'black people built Stonehenge', FFS.
If 'history books' were acknowledged to comprise merely a *predominant*
view of past events, then they could rationally reject any absurdities.
But real-world claims of 'unassailable truth' are never sustainable.
E.g,, I'm guessing the blackHenge crowd have documents, too...
On 2025-05-25 5:32 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 5/25/2025 4:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Do you know when Stonehenge was built? Do you have any idea how many
On May 25, 2025 at 12:56:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 5/25/2025 3:45 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 2:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 8:16:43 AM PDT, "Rhino"Agreed: all of the claims made by the anti-whites are an flat-out >>>>> lies.
<no_offline_contact@example.com>
wrote:
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that schoolchildren in >>>>>>> Britain are being taught these days, including the preposterous >>>>>>> lie that
blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
I have no idea what they mean when they protest *in* Britain to >>>>>> 'decolonize' academic curriculum.
Britain was never a colony. They were the colonizers. I could
understand if
they were protesting in India or some African country that was >>>>>> colonized by
Britain, or even here in America, which used to be British colonies. >>>>>> But how
do you 'decolonize' Britain itself? It was never a colony in the >>>>>> first
place. It's a logical oxymoron.
And how do they claim at the same time that:
(1) Historical Britons were black, and
(2) Britain stole all the wealth from Africa and India
If the second part is true, then what's their gripe with white >>>>>> people?
They should be bitching about all those black Britons that stole the >>>>>> wealth of
Africa.
As such, they need to be removed from the history books so that
kids are
NOT taught this nonsense, otherwise they'll grow up actually
believing
it, making it that much harder to expunge in a future generation. >>>>> There
will be a genuine danger that this nonsense will be accepted as fact >>>>> forever more.
As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute arbiter >>>> of Truth.
There is with regard to the claim 'black people built Stonehenge', FFS.
If 'history books' were acknowledged to comprise merely a *predominant*
view of past events, then they could rationally reject any absurdities.
But real-world claims of 'unassailable truth' are never sustainable.
E.g,, I'm guessing the blackHenge crowd have documents, too...
people in that time and place were literate enough to create documents?
Did they even have a written language that long ago? And that's assuming
they had paper and ink to make records in the first place. Or are you of
the mind that they chiseled these records into clay tablets? If so, do
you have any reason to believe they knew how to do that?
Are you COMPLETELY clueless? Don't you understand that this claim of
black builders of Stonehenge is just a game of cultural appropriation by "activists"? They want to feel like blacks were significant going back
to the earliest days of the country so they're simply claiming to have
been a major part of things all the way along.
On 5/25/2025 5:44 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 5:32 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 5/25/2025 4:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Do you know when Stonehenge was built? Do you have any idea how many
On May 25, 2025 at 12:56:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>If 'history books' were acknowledged to comprise merely a
wrote:
As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute arbiter >>>>> of Truth.
There is with regard to the claim 'black people built Stonehenge', FFS. >>>
*predominant* view of past events, then they could rationally reject
any absurdities. But real-world claims of 'unassailable truth' are
never sustainable. E.g,, I'm guessing the blackHenge crowd have
documents, too...
people in that time and place were literate enough to create documents?
Did they even have a written language that long ago? And that's assuming
they had paper and ink to make records in the first place. Or are you of
the mind that they chiseled these records into clay tablets? If so, do
you have any reason to believe they knew how to do that?
Are you COMPLETELY clueless? Don't you understand that this claim of
black builders of Stonehenge is just a game of cultural appropriation by
"activists"? They want to feel like blacks were significant going back
to the earliest days of the country so they're simply claiming to have
been a major part of things all the way along.
I'm not disputing longstanding accounts of Stonehenge ...especially
since the recent challenges do have a rather blatant p.c. aspect. I'm suggesting we should question our blithe acceptance of "history". Did
you know that Texas classrooms are to display the Ten Commandments,
justified because they're an historical part of our democracy?
On 2025-05-25 6:29 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 5/25/2025 5:44 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 5:32 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 5/25/2025 4:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Do you know when Stonehenge was built? Do you have any idea how many
On May 25, 2025 at 12:56:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>> wrote:If 'history books' were acknowledged to comprise merely a
On 5/25/2025 3:45 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 2:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 8:16:43 AM PDT, "Rhino"Agreed: all of the claims made by the anti-whites are an flat- >>>>>>> out lies.
<no_offline_contact@example.com>
wrote:
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that
schoolchildren in
Britain are being taught these days, including the
preposterous lie that
blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
I have no idea what they mean when they protest *in* Britain to >>>>>>>> 'decolonize' academic curriculum.
Britain was never a colony. They were the colonizers. I could >>>>>>>> understand if
they were protesting in India or some African country that was >>>>>>>> colonized by
Britain, or even here in America, which used to be British >>>>>>>> colonies.
But how
do you 'decolonize' Britain itself? It was never a colony in >>>>>>>> the first
place. It's a logical oxymoron.
And how do they claim at the same time that:
(1) Historical Britons were black, and
(2) Britain stole all the wealth from Africa and India
If the second part is true, then what's their gripe with white >>>>>>>> people?
They should be bitching about all those black Britons that >>>>>>>> stole the
wealth of
Africa.
As such, they need to be removed from the history books so that >>>>>>> kids are
NOT taught this nonsense, otherwise they'll grow up actually >>>>>>> believing
it, making it that much harder to expunge in a future
generation. There
will be a genuine danger that this nonsense will be accepted as >>>>>>> fact
forever more.
As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute arbiter >>>>>> of Truth.
There is with regard to the claim 'black people built Stonehenge', FFS. >>>>
*predominant* view of past events, then they could rationally reject
any absurdities. But real-world claims of 'unassailable truth' are
never sustainable. E.g,, I'm guessing the blackHenge crowd have
documents, too...
people in that time and place were literate enough to create
documents? Did they even have a written language that long ago? And
that's assuming they had paper and ink to make records in the first
place. Or are you of the mind that they chiseled these records into
clay tablets? If so, do you have any reason to believe they knew how
to do that?
Are you COMPLETELY clueless? Don't you understand that this claim of
black builders of Stonehenge is just a game of cultural appropriation
by "activists"? They want to feel like blacks were significant going
back to the earliest days of the country so they're simply claiming to
have been a major part of things all the way along.
I'm not disputing longstanding accounts of Stonehenge
You're not? Then why did you suggest the possibility of documentary
evidence supporting the idea that Stonehenge was built by blacks at a
time and place when it was extremely unlikely that a written language
even existed, let alone the means to record that written language?
...especially
since the recent challenges do have a rather blatant p.c. aspect. I'm
suggesting we should question our blithe acceptance of "history".
I have no idea what you are saying.
DidYes, I saw a headline to that effect. As far as the Ten Commandments
you know that Texas classrooms are to display the Ten Commandments,
justified because they're an historical part of our democracy?
being part of history, that is obviously true. There's also a reasonable argument that the Ten Commandments were a basic set of laws that
informed later laws like the ones governing our respective countries and
the state of Texas. You're apparently clutching your pearls at the
thought of them being on the wall. Why?
Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
Yes, I saw a headline to that effect. As far as the Ten Commandments
being part of history, that is obviously true. There's also a reasonable
argument that the Ten Commandments were a basic set of laws that
informed later laws like the ones governing our respective countries and
the state of Texas. You're apparently clutching your pearls at the
thought of them being on the wall. Why?
Moses brought 15 commandments down from Mount Sinai.
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:31:05 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
wrote:
Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that schoolchildren in
Britain are being taught these days, including the preposterous lie that >>> blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
We don't know for sure when or how or why it was built, but we do know the >> color of the skin of the builders.
Gray.
We know that Stonehenge was built by the little gray aliens.
On Sun, 25 May 2025 15:31:05 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
wrote:
Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that schoolchildren in
Britain are being taught these days, including the preposterous lie that >>> blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
We don't know for sure when or how or why it was built, but we do know the >> color of the skin of the builders.
Gray.
We know that Stonehenge was built by the little gray aliens.
May 25, 2025 at 6:24:05 PM PDT, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>:
Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
Yes, I saw a headline to that effect. As far as the Ten Commandments >>>being part of history, that is obviously true. There's also a reasonable >>>argument that the Ten Commandments were a basic set of laws that
informed later laws like the ones governing our respective countries and >>>the state of Texas. You're apparently clutching your pearls at the >>>thought of them being on the wall. Why?
Moses brought 15 commandments down from Mount Sinai.
Yes, the lost five commandments are:
(1) Thou shalt not pee in the pool.
(2) He who smelt it, dealt it.
(3) Thou shalt keep thy religion to thyself.
(4) Thou shalt not honestly answer thy spouse when asked, "Dost this make me >look fat?"
(5) Thou shalt not take the last piece of pie.
On 2025-05-25 6:29 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 5/25/2025 5:44 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 5:32 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 5/25/2025 4:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Do you know when Stonehenge was built? Do you have any idea how many
On May 25, 2025 at 12:56:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 5/25/2025 3:45 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 2:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 8:16:43 AM PDT, "Rhino"Agreed: all of the claims made by the anti-whites are an flat- >>>>>>> out lies.
<no_offline_contact@example.com>
wrote:
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that
schoolchildren in
Britain are being taught these days, including the
preposterous lie that
blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
I have no idea what they mean when they protest *in* Britain to >>>>>>>> 'decolonize' academic curriculum.
Britain was never a colony. They were the colonizers. I could >>>>>>>> understand if
they were protesting in India or some African country that was >>>>>>>> colonized by
Britain, or even here in America, which used to be British
colonies.
But how
do you 'decolonize' Britain itself? It was never a colony in >>>>>>>> the first
place. It's a logical oxymoron.
And how do they claim at the same time that:
(1) Historical Britons were black, and
(2) Britain stole all the wealth from Africa and India
If the second part is true, then what's their gripe with white >>>>>>>> people?
They should be bitching about all those black Britons that
stole the
wealth of
Africa.
As such, they need to be removed from the history books so that >>>>>>> kids are
NOT taught this nonsense, otherwise they'll grow up actually
believing
it, making it that much harder to expunge in a future
generation. There
will be a genuine danger that this nonsense will be accepted as >>>>>>> fact
forever more.
As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute
arbiter
of Truth.
There is with regard to the claim 'black people built Stonehenge',
FFS.
If 'history books' were acknowledged to comprise merely a
*predominant* view of past events, then they could rationally reject
any absurdities. But real-world claims of 'unassailable truth' are
never sustainable. E.g,, I'm guessing the blackHenge crowd have
documents, too...
people in that time and place were literate enough to create
documents? Did they even have a written language that long ago? And
that's assuming they had paper and ink to make records in the first
place. Or are you of the mind that they chiseled these records into
clay tablets? If so, do you have any reason to believe they knew how
to do that?
Are you COMPLETELY clueless? Don't you understand that this claim of
black builders of Stonehenge is just a game of cultural appropriation
by "activists"? They want to feel like blacks were significant going
back to the earliest days of the country so they're simply claiming
to have been a major part of things all the way along.
I'm not disputing longstanding accounts of Stonehenge
You're not? Then why did you suggest the possibility of documentary
evidence supporting the idea that Stonehenge was built by blacks at a
time and place when it was extremely unlikely that a written language
even existed, let alone the means to record that written language?
...especially since the recent challenges do have a rather blatant
p.c. aspect. I'm suggesting we should question our blithe acceptance
of "history".
I have no idea what you are saying.
Did you know that Texas classrooms are to display the TenYes, I saw a headline to that effect. As far as the Ten Commandments
Commandments, justified because they're an historical part of our
democracy?
being part of history, that is obviously true. There's also a reasonable argument that the Ten Commandments were a basic set of laws that
informed later laws like the ones governing our respective countries and
the state of Texas. You're apparently clutching your pearls at the
thought of them being on the wall. Why?
On May 25, 2025 at 6:02:32 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
On 2025-05-25 6:29 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 5/25/2025 5:44 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 5:32 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 5/25/2025 4:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Do you know when Stonehenge was built? Do you have any idea how many >>>> people in that time and place were literate enough to create
On May 25, 2025 at 12:56:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>>> wrote:
On 5/25/2025 3:45 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 2:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 8:16:43 AM PDT, "Rhino"Agreed: all of the claims made by the anti-whites are an flat- >>>>>>>> out lies.
<no_offline_contact@example.com>
wrote:
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense thatI have no idea what they mean when they protest *in* Britain to >>>>>>>>> 'decolonize' academic curriculum.
schoolchildren in
Britain are being taught these days, including the
preposterous lie that
blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes] >>>>>>>>>
Britain was never a colony. They were the colonizers. I could >>>>>>>>> understand if
they were protesting in India or some African country that was >>>>>>>>> colonized by
Britain, or even here in America, which used to be British >>>>>>>>> colonies.
But how
do you 'decolonize' Britain itself? It was never a colony in >>>>>>>>> the first
place. It's a logical oxymoron.
And how do they claim at the same time that:
(1) Historical Britons were black, and
(2) Britain stole all the wealth from Africa and India
If the second part is true, then what's their gripe with white >>>>>>>>> people?
They should be bitching about all those black Britons that >>>>>>>>> stole the
wealth of
Africa.
As such, they need to be removed from the history books so that >>>>>>>> kids are
NOT taught this nonsense, otherwise they'll grow up actually >>>>>>>> believing
it, making it that much harder to expunge in a future
generation. There
will be a genuine danger that this nonsense will be accepted as >>>>>>>> fact
forever more.
As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute arbiter
of Truth.
There is with regard to the claim 'black people built Stonehenge', FFS.
If 'history books' were acknowledged to comprise merely a
*predominant* view of past events, then they could rationally reject >>>>> any absurdities. But real-world claims of 'unassailable truth' are >>>>> never sustainable. E.g,, I'm guessing the blackHenge crowd have
documents, too...
documents? Did they even have a written language that long ago? And
that's assuming they had paper and ink to make records in the first
place. Or are you of the mind that they chiseled these records into
clay tablets? If so, do you have any reason to believe they knew how >>>> to do that?
Are you COMPLETELY clueless? Don't you understand that this claim of >>>> black builders of Stonehenge is just a game of cultural appropriation >>>> by "activists"? They want to feel like blacks were significant going >>>> back to the earliest days of the country so they're simply claiming to >>>> have been a major part of things all the way along.
I'm not disputing longstanding accounts of Stonehenge
You're not? Then why did you suggest the possibility of documentary
evidence supporting the idea that Stonehenge was built by blacks at a
time and place when it was extremely unlikely that a written language
even existed, let alone the means to record that written language?
...especially
since the recent challenges do have a rather blatant p.c. aspect. I'm >>> suggesting we should question our blithe acceptance of "history".
I have no idea what you are saying.
DidYes, I saw a headline to that effect. As far as the Ten Commandments
you know that Texas classrooms are to display the Ten Commandments,
justified because they're an historical part of our democracy?
being part of history, that is obviously true. There's also a reasonable
argument that the Ten Commandments were a basic set of laws that
informed later laws like the ones governing our respective countries and
the state of Texas. You're apparently clutching your pearls at the
thought of them being on the wall. Why?
It's ironic and somewhat legally inexplicable that the Supreme Court ruled the
10 Commandments to be an unacceptable violation of the 1st Amendment in government buildings (schools), when the 10 Commandments are inscribed on the walls of the Supreme Court itself.
On May 25, 2025 at 3:29:32 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 5/25/2025 5:44 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 5:32 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 5/25/2025 4:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Do you know when Stonehenge was built? Do you have any idea how many
On May 25, 2025 at 12:56:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>> wrote:If 'history books' were acknowledged to comprise merely a
As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute arbiter >>>>>> of Truth.
There is with regard to the claim 'black people built Stonehenge', FFS. >>>>
*predominant* view of past events, then they could rationally reject >>>> any absurdities. But real-world claims of 'unassailable truth' are
never sustainable. E.g,, I'm guessing the blackHenge crowd have
documents, too...
people in that time and place were literate enough to create documents? >>> Did they even have a written language that long ago? And that's assuming >>> they had paper and ink to make records in the first place. Or are you of >>> the mind that they chiseled these records into clay tablets? If so, do >>> you have any reason to believe they knew how to do that?
Are you COMPLETELY clueless? Don't you understand that this claim of
black builders of Stonehenge is just a game of cultural appropriation by >>> "activists"? They want to feel like blacks were significant going back >>> to the earliest days of the country so they're simply claiming to have >>> been a major part of things all the way along.
I'm not disputing longstanding accounts of Stonehenge ...especially
since the recent challenges do have a rather blatant p.c. aspect. I'm
suggesting we should question our blithe acceptance of "history". Did
you know that Texas classrooms are to display the Ten Commandments,
justified because they're an historical part of our democracy?
On the other hand, if you're one of the 'progressive' Marxists who run California schools, you're allowed to force the kids to participate in any religious ceremony or prayer you like, just so long as it's not Christian.
Several years ago, the San Francisco schools were caught bringing imams into the classroom and having the kids recite the Muslim prayer of conversion to Islam. Yet the two words "under god" in the pledge of allegiance are supposedly unconstitutional because "we all know they refer to the Christian god".
Of course, if they'd brought in a Catholic priest to say the Liturgy, forcing
the children to participate no less, the ACLU would have shit itself and wouldn't have been able to file lawsuits fast enough.
On May 25, 2025 at 2:32:07 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 5/25/2025 4:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 12:56:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:If 'history books' were acknowledged to comprise merely a *predominant*
On 5/25/2025 3:45 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 2:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 8:16:43 AM PDT, "Rhino"Agreed: all of the claims made by the anti-whites are an flat-out lies.
<no_offline_contact@example.com>
wrote:
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that schoolchildren in >>>>>>> Britain are being taught these days, including the preposterous lie that
blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
I have no idea what they mean when they protest *in* Britain to >>>>>> 'decolonize' academic curriculum.
Britain was never a colony. They were the colonizers. I could
understand if
they were protesting in India or some African country that was >>>>>> colonized by
Britain, or even here in America, which used to be British colonies. >>>>>> But how
do you 'decolonize' Britain itself? It was never a colony in the first
place. It's a logical oxymoron.
And how do they claim at the same time that:
(1) Historical Britons were black, and
(2) Britain stole all the wealth from Africa and India
If the second part is true, then what's their gripe with white people?
They should be bitching about all those black Britons that stole the >>>>>> wealth of Africa.
As such, they need to be removed from the history books so that kids are
NOT taught this nonsense, otherwise they'll grow up actually believing
it, making it that much harder to expunge in a future generation. There
will be a genuine danger that this nonsense will be accepted as fact >>>>> forever more.
As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute arbiter >>>> of Truth.
There is with regard to the claim 'black people built Stonehenge', FFS. >>
view of past events, then they could rationally reject any absurdities.
But real-world claims of 'unassailable truth' are never sustainable.
E.g,, I'm guessing the blackHenge crowd have documents, too...
Or they just made up the documents to suit a political agenda, like they did with the Cheddar Man example in my original post.
On 5/25/2025 9:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 3:29:32 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>
On 5/25/2025 5:44 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 5:32 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 5/25/2025 4:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Do you know when Stonehenge was built? Do you have any idea how many >>>> people in that time and place were literate enough to create documents? >>>> Did they even have a written language that long ago? And that's assuming
On May 25, 2025 at 12:56:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>>> wrote:
As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute arbiter
of Truth.
There is with regard to the claim 'black people built Stonehenge', FFS.
If 'history books' were acknowledged to comprise merely a
*predominant* view of past events, then they could rationally reject >>>>> any absurdities. But real-world claims of 'unassailable truth' are >>>>> never sustainable. E.g,, I'm guessing the blackHenge crowd have
documents, too...
they had paper and ink to make records in the first place. Or are you of
the mind that they chiseled these records into clay tablets? If so, do >>>> you have any reason to believe they knew how to do that?
Are you COMPLETELY clueless? Don't you understand that this claim of >>>> black builders of Stonehenge is just a game of cultural appropriation by
"activists"? They want to feel like blacks were significant going back >>>> to the earliest days of the country so they're simply claiming to have >>>> been a major part of things all the way along.
I'm not disputing longstanding accounts of Stonehenge ...especially
since the recent challenges do have a rather blatant p.c. aspect. I'm
suggesting we should question our blithe acceptance of "history". Did
you know that Texas classrooms are to display the Ten Commandments,
justified because they're an historical part of our democracy?
On the other hand, if you're one of the 'progressive' Marxists who run
California schools, you're allowed to force the kids to participate in any >> religious ceremony or prayer you like, just so long as it's not Christian. >>
Several years ago, the San Francisco schools were caught bringing imams into
the classroom and having the kids recite the Muslim prayer of conversion to >> Islam. Yet the two words "under god" in the pledge of allegiance are
supposedly unconstitutional because "we all know they refer to the Christian
god".
Of course, if they'd brought in a Catholic priest to say the Liturgy,
forcing
the children to participate no less, the ACLU would have shit itself and
wouldn't have been able to file lawsuits fast enough.
This is "whataboutism" being preached to the choir...
May 26, 2025 at 8:40:58 AM PDT, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>5/25/2025 9:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
May 25, 2025 at 3:29:32 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>>5/25/2025 5:44 PM, Rhino wrote:
2025-05-25 5:32 PM, moviePig wrote:
5/25/2025 4:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
May 25, 2025 at 12:56:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>:
As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute >>>>>>>>arbiter of Truth.
There is with regard to the claim 'black people built Stonehenge', >>>>>>>FFS.
If 'history books' were acknowledged to comprise merely a >>>>>>*predominant* view of past events, then they could rationally reject >>>>>>any absurdities. But real-world claims of 'unassailable truth' are >>>>>>never sustainable. E.g,, I'm guessing the blackHenge crowd have >>>>>>documents, too...
Do you know when Stonehenge was built? Do you have any idea how many >>>>>people in that time and place were literate enough to create documents? >>>>>Did they even have a written language that long ago? And that's assuming >>>>>they had paper and ink to make records in the first place. Or are you of >>>>>the mind that they chiseled these records into clay tablets? If so, do >>>>>you have any reason to believe they knew how to do that?
Are you COMPLETELY clueless? Don't you understand that this claim of >>>>>black builders of Stonehenge is just a game of cultural appropriation by >>>>>"activists"? They want to feel like blacks were significant going back >>>>>to the earliest days of the country so they're simply claiming to have >>>>>been a major part of things all the way along.
I'm not disputing longstanding accounts of Stonehenge ...especially >>>>since the recent challenges do have a rather blatant p.c. aspect. I'm >>>>suggesting we should question our blithe acceptance of "history". Did >>>>you know that Texas classrooms are to display the Ten Commandments, >>>>justified because they're an historical part of our democracy?
On the other hand, if you're one of the 'progressive' Marxists who run >>>California schools, you're allowed to force the kids to participate in any >>>religious ceremony or prayer you like, just so long as it's not Christian.
Several years ago, the San Francisco schools were caught bringing imams into >>>the classroom and having the kids recite the Muslim prayer of conversion to >>>Islam. Yet the two words "under god" in the pledge of allegiance are >>>supposedly unconstitutional because "we all know they refer to the Christian >>>god".
Of course, if they'd brought in a Catholic priest to say the Liturgy, >>>forcing the children to participate no less, the ACLU would have shit >>>itself and wouldn't have been able to file lawsuits fast enough.
This is "whataboutism" being preached to the choir...
"Whataboutism" is a concept invented to prevent people from holding the >inventors accountable for their hypocrisy.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
May 26, 2025 at 8:40:58 AM PDT, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
5/25/2025 9:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
May 25, 2025 at 3:29:32 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>>> 5/25/2025 5:44 PM, Rhino wrote:
2025-05-25 5:32 PM, moviePig wrote:
5/25/2025 4:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
May 25, 2025 at 12:56:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>:
As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute >>>>>>>>> arbiter of Truth.
There is with regard to the claim 'black people built Stonehenge', >>>>>>>> FFS.
If 'history books' were acknowledged to comprise merely a
*predominant* view of past events, then they could rationally reject >>>>>>> any absurdities. But real-world claims of 'unassailable truth' are >>>>>>> never sustainable. E.g,, I'm guessing the blackHenge crowd have
documents, too...
Do you know when Stonehenge was built? Do you have any idea how many >>>>>> people in that time and place were literate enough to create documents? >>>>>> Did they even have a written language that long ago? And that's assuming >>>>>> they had paper and ink to make records in the first place. Or are you of >>>>>> the mind that they chiseled these records into clay tablets? If so, do >>>>>> you have any reason to believe they knew how to do that?
Are you COMPLETELY clueless? Don't you understand that this claim of >>>>>> black builders of Stonehenge is just a game of cultural appropriation by >>>>>> "activists"? They want to feel like blacks were significant going back >>>>>> to the earliest days of the country so they're simply claiming to have >>>>>> been a major part of things all the way along.
I'm not disputing longstanding accounts of Stonehenge ...especially
since the recent challenges do have a rather blatant p.c. aspect. I'm >>>>> suggesting we should question our blithe acceptance of "history". Did >>>>> you know that Texas classrooms are to display the Ten Commandments,
justified because they're an historical part of our democracy?
On the other hand, if you're one of the 'progressive' Marxists who run >>>> California schools, you're allowed to force the kids to participate in any >>>> religious ceremony or prayer you like, just so long as it's not Christian.
Several years ago, the San Francisco schools were caught bringing imams into
the classroom and having the kids recite the Muslim prayer of conversion to
Islam. Yet the two words "under god" in the pledge of allegiance are
supposedly unconstitutional because "we all know they refer to the Christian
god".
Of course, if they'd brought in a Catholic priest to say the Liturgy,
forcing the children to participate no less, the ACLU would have shit
itself and wouldn't have been able to file lawsuits fast enough.
This is "whataboutism" being preached to the choir...
"Whataboutism" is a concept invented to prevent people from holding the
inventors accountable for their hypocrisy.
I looked it up at Wikipedia. Lexicograph Ben Zimmer finds this to be the original use:
I would not suggest such a thing were it not for the
Whatabouts. These are the people who answer every condemnation
of the Provisional I.R.A. with an argument to prove the greater
immorality of the "enemy", and therefore the justice of the
Provisionals' cause: "What about Bloody Sunday, internment,
torture, force-feeding, army intimidation?". Every call to stop
is answered in the same way: "What about the Treaty of Limerick;
the Anglo-Irish treaty of 1921; Lenadoon?". Neither is the Church
immune: "The Catholic Church has never supported the national
cause. What about Papal sanction for the Norman invasion;
condemnation of the Fenians by Moriarty; Parnell?"
-- Sean O'Conaill, "Letter to Editor", The Irish Times, 30 Jan 1974
But I'm sure he was Black Irish.
. . .
Several years ago, the San Francisco schools were caught bringing imams into >the classroom and having the kids recite the Muslim prayer of conversion to >Islam. Yet the two words "under god" in the pledge of allegiance are >supposedly unconstitutional because "we all know they refer to the Christian >god".
Of course, if they'd brought in a Catholic priest to say the Liturgy, forcing >the children to participate no less, the ACLU would have shit itself and >wouldn't have been able to file lawsuits fast enough.
On May 26, 2025 at 8:40:58 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 5/25/2025 9:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On May 25, 2025 at 3:29:32 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>
On 5/25/2025 5:44 PM, Rhino wrote:
On 2025-05-25 5:32 PM, moviePig wrote:
On 5/25/2025 4:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Do you know when Stonehenge was built? Do you have any idea how many >>>>> people in that time and place were literate enough to create documents?
On May 25, 2025 at 12:56:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute arbiter
of Truth.
There is with regard to the claim 'black people built Stonehenge', FFS.
If 'history books' were acknowledged to comprise merely a
*predominant* view of past events, then they could rationally reject >>>>>> any absurdities. But real-world claims of 'unassailable truth' are >>>>>> never sustainable. E.g,, I'm guessing the blackHenge crowd have >>>>>> documents, too...
Did they even have a written language that long ago? And that's assuming
they had paper and ink to make records in the first place. Or are you of
the mind that they chiseled these records into clay tablets? If so, do
you have any reason to believe they knew how to do that?
Are you COMPLETELY clueless? Don't you understand that this claim of >>>>> black builders of Stonehenge is just a game of cultural appropriation by
"activists"? They want to feel like blacks were significant going back
to the earliest days of the country so they're simply claiming to have
been a major part of things all the way along.
I'm not disputing longstanding accounts of Stonehenge ...especially
since the recent challenges do have a rather blatant p.c. aspect. I'm >>>> suggesting we should question our blithe acceptance of "history". Did >>>> you know that Texas classrooms are to display the Ten Commandments,
justified because they're an historical part of our democracy?
On the other hand, if you're one of the 'progressive' Marxists who run >>> California schools, you're allowed to force the kids to participate in any
religious ceremony or prayer you like, just so long as it's not Christian.
Several years ago, the San Francisco schools were caught bringing imams into
the classroom and having the kids recite the Muslim prayer of conversion to
Islam. Yet the two words "under god" in the pledge of allegiance are
supposedly unconstitutional because "we all know they refer to the Christian
god".
Of course, if they'd brought in a Catholic priest to say the Liturgy,
forcing
the children to participate no less, the ACLU would have shit itself and >>> wouldn't have been able to file lawsuits fast enough.
This is "whataboutism" being preached to the choir...
"Whataboutism" is a concept invented to prevent people from holding the inventors accountable for their hypocrisy.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
. . .
Several years ago, the San Francisco schools were caught bringing imams into >> the classroom and having the kids recite the Muslim prayer of conversion to >> Islam. Yet the two words "under god" in the pledge of allegiance are
supposedly unconstitutional because "we all know they refer to the Christian >> god".
There have been parents suing school boards for the forced recitation of
the pledge with "under God" in it making exactly that claim.
Why was that wrong?
The last I read about such a lawsuit, it was filed in a district court
in the Ninth Circuit in which the merits of the argument could not be considered in court, requiring an en banc decision of the entire circuit
to reverse precedent. It's widely assumed that if the merits were ever considered, the plaintiff would prevail.
Seems to me that forcing students to pray or to recite "under God" in
the Pledge of Allegiance is an obvious infringement upon free exercise.
A student, not being a wise ass, could consider how he prays to be a
private matter, or that he's religious but it's not applicable to his perception of God, or that religious or not, school must remain a
secular activity, or that he's an atheist.
Too bad the Ninth has refused to take such a case about reciting the
Pledge for it would have made the Muslim prayer unconstitutional without
the need for another appellate court ruling.
It's not a good analogy given that "under God" was added to the Pledge as
a loyalty test during anti-Commie hysteria forcing children to profess
some sort of religious sentiment to demonstrate that they aren't being
raised as ghodless Commies. That's why the argument has been made that
it refers to a Christian God, as it was generally Christians claiming to
be the main fighters against Communism for the right to worship freely.
It's actually the perfect example of why Jefferson's desire for there to
be a "wall of separation between church and state" was correct, what a bureaucrat might think is an innocuous form of a state-sponsored
religious acknowledgement that is likely to offend both religious and non-religious people.
Of course, if they'd brought in a Catholic priest to say the Liturgy,
forcing
the children to participate no less, the ACLU would have shit itself and
wouldn't have been able to file lawsuits fast enough.
If Islam is favored at the expense of other religions, then that's an unconstitutional Establishment of religion. If it were being done as a comparison of religions without favoritism, then it wouldn't have been unconstitutional.
Do you know for a fact that ACLU of California was asked, but refused,
to seek an injunction on Islam being favored in public schools? I've
never heard of this type of thing.
May 26, 2025 at 12:42:07 PM PDT, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com>:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
. . .
Several years ago, the San Francisco schools were caught bringing
imams into the classroom and having the kids recite the Muslim prayer
of conversion to Islam. Yet the two words "under god" in the pledge
of allegiance are supposedly unconstitutional because "we all know
they refer to the Christian god". . . .
Of course, if they'd brought in a Catholic priest to say the Liturgy, >>>forcing the children to participate no less, the ACLU would have shit >>>itself and wouldn't have been able to file lawsuits fast enough.
If Islam is favored at the expense of other religions, then that's an >>unconstitutional Establishment of religion. If it were being done as a >>comparison of religions without favoritism, then it wouldn't have been >>unconstitutional.
Comparing religions in the classroom does not require bringing in a holy man >(from only one of the religions being discussed, mind you) and having the >students recite prayers. There's absolutely no legal defense for any of that.
Do you know for a fact that ACLU of California was asked, but refused,
to seek an injunction on Islam being favored in public schools? I've
never heard of this type of thing.
The public outcry was enough to have SF schools back off.
It's also interesting to note that under Islam, merely saying the words to the >Shahada, the Muslim prayer of conversion, automatically makes one a Muslim, so >as far as the Muslim community is concerned, all the school kids who recited >that prayer at the behest of their teachers are now Muslims and if they >subsequently rejected Islam by continuing to practice Christianity or Judaism >or any other religion (or no religion at all), they are considered apostates >and can be legally killed under Sharia law. Given the number of radical >Islamists out there that our government has happily imported into America over >the last half-decade, that's no inconsequential concern for the parents of >those children.
On May 26, 2025 at 12:42:07 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
. . .
Several years ago, the San Francisco schools were caught bringing imams into
the classroom and having the kids recite the Muslim prayer of conversion to >>> Islam. Yet the two words "under god" in the pledge of allegiance are
supposedly unconstitutional because "we all know they refer to the Christian
god".
There have been parents suing school boards for the forced recitation of
the pledge with "under God" in it making exactly that claim.
Why was that wrong?
The last I read about such a lawsuit, it was filed in a district court
in the Ninth Circuit in which the merits of the argument could not be
considered in court, requiring an en banc decision of the entire circuit
to reverse precedent. It's widely assumed that if the merits were ever
considered, the plaintiff would prevail.
Seems to me that forcing students to pray or to recite "under God" in
the Pledge of Allegiance is an obvious infringement upon free exercise.
A student, not being a wise ass, could consider how he prays to be a
private matter, or that he's religious but it's not applicable to his
perception of God, or that religious or not, school must remain a
secular activity, or that he's an atheist.
Too bad the Ninth has refused to take such a case about reciting the
Pledge for it would have made the Muslim prayer unconstitutional without
the need for another appellate court ruling.
It's not a good analogy given that "under God" was added to the Pledge as
a loyalty test during anti-Commie hysteria forcing children to profess
some sort of religious sentiment to demonstrate that they aren't being
raised as ghodless Commies. That's why the argument has been made that
it refers to a Christian God, as it was generally Christians claiming to
be the main fighters against Communism for the right to worship freely.
It's actually the perfect example of why Jefferson's desire for there to
be a "wall of separation between church and state" was correct, what a
bureaucrat might think is an innocuous form of a state-sponsored
religious acknowledgement that is likely to offend both religious and
non-religious people.
Of course, if they'd brought in a Catholic priest to say the Liturgy,
forcing
the children to participate no less, the ACLU would have shit itself and >>> wouldn't have been able to file lawsuits fast enough.
If Islam is favored at the expense of other religions, then that's an
unconstitutional Establishment of religion. If it were being done as a
comparison of religions without favoritism, then it wouldn't have been
unconstitutional.
Comparing religions in the classroom does not require bringing in a holy man (from only one of the religions being discussed, mind you) and having the students recite prayers. There's absolutely no legal defense for any of that.
Do you know for a fact that ACLU of California was asked, but refused,
to seek an injunction on Islam being favored in public schools? I've
never heard of this type of thing.
The public outcry was enough to have SF schools back off.
It's also interesting to note that under Islam, merely saying the words to the
Shahada, the Muslim prayer of conversion, automatically makes one a Muslim, so
as far as the Muslim community is concerned, all the school kids who recited that prayer at the behest of their teachers are now Muslims and if they subsequently rejected Islam by continuing to practice Christianity or Judaism or any other religion (or no religion at all), they are considered apostates and can be legally killed under Sharia law. Given the number of radical Islamists out there that our government has happily imported into America over
the last half-decade, that's no inconsequential concern for the parents of those children.
Leo Kearse provides examples of the nonsense that schoolchildren in
Britain are being taught these days, including the preposterous lie that >blacks built Stonehenge.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_59qWR2xLnA [8 minutes]
As usual, the flaw in the ointment is that there's no absolute arbiter
of Truth. E.g., maybe the moon landing *was* faked...
But I'm sure he was Black Irish.
Then he probably built Blarney-Stonehenge...
Are you COMPLETELY clueless? Don't you understand that this claim of
black builders of Stonehenge is just a game of cultural appropriation by >"activists"? They want to feel like blacks were significant going back
to the earliest days of the country so they're simply claiming to have
been a major part of things all the way along.
Too bad the Ninth has refused to take such a case about reciting the
Pledge for it would have made the Muslim prayer unconstitutional without
the need for another appellate court ruling.
It would also make former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau an apostate
because he said the Shahada during a visit to a mosque while he was PM.
It's also done so blacks and other bipocs don't have to explain their >hypocrisy when they come to 'colonize' a native land that doesn't belong to >them. They condemn it when whites went to brown countries but now that all the >brown people are flooding into white native lands, the bipocs have become the >colonizers so they have to figure out a way around having take responsibility >for that. The easiest way is to claim Britain isn't really natively white; >that blacks have been there from the beginning.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 36:15:20 |
| Calls: | 10,392 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 14,064 |
| Messages: | 6,417,152 |