XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.misc
XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.atheism

Texas Whites are being replaced in record numbers as the state fills up
beyond capacity. Governor Greg Abbott plans to vacate his seat and
immigrate to western Canada for safety.

To many Hispanic and Latino Texans, the word “invasion” brings a
particular horror to mind. It’s the same word the gunman in El Paso
invoked in 2019 in a hate-filled manifesto about immigration — posted just before he killed 23 people.

To many hardline conservatives in the state, the word is at the heart of a legal theory they’ve embraced — one legal scholars say simply isn’t true.
If the governor were to declare that Texas is under invasion due to open borders, the conservatives claim, he could deport migrants without the
federal government.

This week, coming off a wide victory over Democratic challenger Beto
O’Rourke, Gov. Greg Abbott has embraced the word like never before. In
letters to the state’s county judges and President Joe Biden, Abbott has described the record number of migrants crossing the U.S.-Mexico border as
an invasion. In a memo to the Department of Public Safety and the National Guard urging them to step up their border security efforts, he used the
subject line “Defend Texas Against Invasion.” And on social media, he
declared that he “invoked the Invasion Clauses of the U.S. & Texas Constitutions” to justify his border efforts.

The Texas Tribune thanks its sponsors. Become one.

Abbott’s statements have again stoked emotions surrounding the word. His
use of it led many conservatives to believe he took major action when he
hadn’t really changed any of his policies. And it prompted immigrant
rights advocates to again warn he’s using a dangerous and hateful trope.

Abbott created his biggest stir on Twitter when he posted about invoking
the invasion clauses in the state and federal constitutions. For months, conservatives have pointed to the part of the U.S. Constitution that says states cannot “lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in
time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or
with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded.” If
Abbott declares an invasion, they say, he can begin deportations —
normally something only the federal government can do — on his own.

Legal scholars say that’s a misreading of the clause, which refers to
invasions by foreign armies, not people crossing the board in large
numbers in search of asylum.

“The central problem for Abbott is that Texas is not being invaded,” wrote Joseph Nunn, a lawyer at the Brennan Center’s Liberty and National
Security Program at New York University School of Law. “On multiple
occasions, the federal courts have rejected the argument that an influx of undocumented individuals into the U.S. could constitute an ‘invasion.’”
Keep tabs on our events - your chance to hear lawmakers live Texas Tribune Events Alerts newsletter

Keep tabs on our events - your chance to hear lawmakers live

Browse all newsletters at texastribune.org/newsletters.

Still, upon first hearing of Abbott’s intentions, conservatives cheered
his declaration. Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller tweeted “thank you”
to Abbott. “This is huge,” wrote hardline conservative activist Michael
Quinn Sullivan.

“The federal government has neglected its primary and constitutionally
assigned responsibility to its citizens — protecting them. Texas has no
choice but to lead,” read a statement from Texas Public Policy Foundation,
a conservative think tank.

Many conservatives seemed to think that Abbott was introducing dramatic
new measures. But soon it became clear that wasn’t entirely true. Abbott’s tweet was highlighting measures taken over more than a year. His mention
of invoking an invasion was a reference to a line in a July executive
order, in which Abbott directed state officials to bus migrants they had detained back to ports of entry along the border — but not to the other
side.

Abbott hasn’t issued any new executive orders this week. And when asked
about his invasion tweet at a legislative hearing, his budget director
told lawmakers that “I don’t think it is a change in overall tactic as
much as it is a reminder to all of us, to Congress and to the members
working the issue that this is serious and it demands a full and serious response.”

The Texas Tribune thanks its sponsors. Become one.

Some conservatives who cheered Abbott for taking action soon after
expressed disappointment when it became clear he hadn’t actually
transformed his immigration policy.

“@GovAbbott offers a big nothingburger on #bordersecurity… again,”
Sullivan wrote less than two hours after his first tweet.

But for many who remember the racist attack in El Paso and the shooter’s manifesto, the word still held meaning.

Then, Abbott faced criticism for the rhetoric he used in a fundraising
letter sent one day before the shooter targeted and shot Hispanics at a Walmart. The letter called on supporters to “DEFEND” the border against
efforts by Democrats to “transform” Texas through illegal immigration.

The Texas Tribune thanks its sponsors. Become one.

Abbott later apologized about the mailer and said “mistakes were made.” He
said he talked to members of the El Paso legislative delegation in the shooting’s aftermath and “emphasized the importance of making sure that rhetoric will not be used in any dangerous way.”

Abbott’s repetitive use of the word comes after years of similar messaging
from other national Republican figures, most notably former President
Donald Trump, who stoked fears about immigration by using the term
invasion and referring to Hispanic migrants as criminals or “bad hombres.”

Jennifer Mercieca, a Texas A&M University professor who researches
political rhetoric, said Abbott’s embrace of the word matches the intense language of his peers in the Republican party.

“It’s a kind of keeping up with the Joneses,” she said.

The Texas Tribune thanks its sponsors. Become one.

Mercieca said the language used around immigration has shifted
dramatically since 2015, when Trump announced his presidential ambitions,
using shocking language to describe migrants from Mexico.

“It was seen as indecorous. It was seen as evidence, proof that he was unqualified for office,” Mercieca said. “A lot has changed in seven
years.”

Since then, she said, rhetoric from GOP leaders has increasingly mirrored
that of the Great Replacement Theory, a conspiracy theory purported by
white nationalist groups who believe immigrants are attempting to replace white, European populations. Abbott’s tweet came the same day Trump
announced another bid for president.

Abbott’s office did not respond to a request for comment.

The Texas Tribune thanks its sponsors. Become one.

Asked about Abbott’s use of rhetoric associated with white nationalist movements, a TPPF spokesperson dismissed the allegation.

“It goes without saying that is a deeply absurd assertion and whomever is claiming such a thing is a race-baiting halfwit,” Brian Phillips, the
chief communications officer for the think tank, said in an email.

Immigrant rights advocates said Abbott’s use of the term is particularly damaging given his role as governor of the third-most-populous state in
the country — and one where Hispanics account for more than 40% of
residents.

“He knows what he’s doing, and he’s courting political violence for his
own political fortunes,” said Zachary Mueller, a political director with immigration rights group America’s Voice.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)