• Re: I'm so sick of Pedro Pascal.

    From suzeeq@21:1/5 to Your Name on Wed Jul 2 18:00:34 2025
    On 7/2/2025 2:51 PM, Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-07-02 16:33:54 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
    https://youtu.be/HiCKzZHKOBs?si=EZMR6D6nhAG4XWqk


    Good video. She likes him a lot more than I do.

    My favorite part is when he takes off his glasses to look at nails. He
    takes off his glasses to see better. I had wondered if they were fake.

    It depends on your vision.

    I'm short-sighted, so need glasses to see distance, but when working on something small close-up, it is better to take my glasses off. This can become more of a problem as people age, which is why they sometimes get bifocals - the upper half of the lenses for long distance and the lower
    half of the lenses for close work / reading.

    I'm the same way. I haven't worn my glasses for reading for decades. Whe
    I wear the contacts, I use cheap readers to read labels in the store, etc.


    On the UK TV show "The Repair Shop", the clock repair expert Steve
    Fletcher often wears two or even three pairs of glasses at the same time
    when working on the small items. One of the other experts has also used
    the same idea a couple of times. <https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/article30288011.ece/ALTERNATES/s1200d/0_Steven-Fletcher.jpg>



    It can also depends on your glasses. If the lenses are tinted for sun protection, then that can make it harder to see small close up things.


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to suzeeq on Thu Jul 3 18:18:29 2025
    On 2025-07-03 01:00:34 +0000, suzeeq said:
    On 7/2/2025 2:51 PM, Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-07-02 16:33:54 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
    https://youtu.be/HiCKzZHKOBs?si=EZMR6D6nhAG4XWqk

    Good video. She likes him a lot more than I do.

    My favorite part is when he takes off his glasses to look at nails. He
    takes off his glasses to see better. I had wondered if they were fake.

    It depends on your vision.

    I'm short-sighted, so need glasses to see distance, but when working on
    something small close-up, it is better to take my glasses off. This can
    become more of a problem as people age, which is why they sometimes get
    bifocals - the upper half of the lenses for long distance and the lower
    half of the lenses for close work / reading.

    I'm the same way. I haven't worn my glasses for reading for decades.
    Whe I wear the contacts, I use cheap readers to read labels in the
    store, etc.

    Reading normal books and magazines is fine for me, but I do take my
    glasses off when doing really small things such as when cutting out
    tightly / cleanly around the outline of a small image for craft work,
    the rare occasion I have to thread a needle, etc.



    On the UK TV show "The Repair Shop", the clock repair expert Steve
    Fletcher often wears two or even three pairs of glasses at the same
    time when working on the small items. One of the other experts has also
    used the same idea a couple of times.
    <https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/article30288011.ece/ALTERNATES/s1200d/0_Steven-Fletcher.jpg>



    It can also depends on your glasses. If the lenses are tinted for sun
    protection, then that can make it harder to see small close up things.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 15 19:46:06 2025
    On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 09:51:59 +1200, Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
    wrote:

    I'm short-sighted, so need glasses to see distance, but when working on >something small close-up, it is better to take my glasses off. This can >become more of a problem as people age, which is why they sometimes get >bifocals - the upper half of the lenses for long distance and the lower
    half of the lenses for close work / reading.

    Hmmm. I've had bifocals since my late teens - and that's nearly 50
    years ago.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From s|b@21:1/5 to Ubiquitous on Sat Aug 9 13:32:36 2025
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.movies.current-films

    On Wed, 02 Jul 2025 04:30:43 -0400, Ubiquitous wrote:

    https://youtu.be/HiCKzZHKOBs?si=EZMR6D6nhAG4XWqk

    I lost interest after 5 minutes or so.

    --
    s|b

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From super70s@21:1/5 to Your Name on Sat Aug 9 09:21:42 2025
    On 2025-07-03 06:18:29 +0000, Your Name said:

    On 2025-07-03 01:00:34 +0000, suzeeq said:
    On 7/2/2025 2:51 PM, Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-07-02 16:33:54 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
    https://youtu.be/HiCKzZHKOBs?si=EZMR6D6nhAG4XWqk

    Good video. She likes him a lot more than I do.

    My favorite part is when he takes off his glasses to look at nails. He >>>> takes off his glasses to see better. I had wondered if they were fake.

    It depends on your vision.

    I'm short-sighted, so need glasses to see distance, but when working on
    something small close-up, it is better to take my glasses off. This can
    become more of a problem as people age, which is why they sometimes get
    bifocals - the upper half of the lenses for long distance and the lower
    half of the lenses for close work / reading.

    I'm the same way. I haven't worn my glasses for reading for decades.
    Whe I wear the contacts, I use cheap readers to read labels in the
    store, etc.

    Reading normal books and magazines is fine for me, but I do take my
    glasses off when doing really small things such as when cutting out
    tightly / cleanly around the outline of a small image for craft work,
    the rare occasion I have to thread a needle, etc.

    You'll probably begin to have problems with reading when you get into
    your 40s or fairly soon if you're already there.

    I like readers made by Foster-Grant you can buy on a stand alone
    display at Dollar General Stores, they're about $12 or $15 I guess.
    They're about as lightweight as possible -- just acrylic lenses and
    three pieces of aluminum -- and don't make indentations on the bridge
    of your nose.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to All on Sun Aug 10 10:17:15 2025
    On 2025-08-09 14:21:42 +0000, super70s said:
    On 2025-07-03 06:18:29 +0000, Your Name said:
    On 2025-07-03 01:00:34 +0000, suzeeq said:
    On 7/2/2025 2:51 PM, Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-07-02 16:33:54 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
    https://youtu.be/HiCKzZHKOBs?si=EZMR6D6nhAG4XWqk

    Good video. She likes him a lot more than I do.

    My favorite part is when he takes off his glasses to look at nails. He >>>>> takes off his glasses to see better. I had wondered if they were fake. >>>>
    It depends on your vision.

    I'm short-sighted, so need glasses to see distance, but when working on >>>> something small close-up, it is better to take my glasses off. This can >>>> become more of a problem as people age, which is why they sometimes get >>>> bifocals - the upper half of the lenses for long distance and the lower >>>> half of the lenses for close work / reading.

    I'm the same way. I haven't worn my glasses for reading for decades.
    Whe I wear the contacts, I use cheap readers to read labels in the
    store, etc.

    Reading normal books and magazines is fine for me, but I do take my
    glasses off when doing really small things such as when cutting out
    tightly / cleanly around the outline of a small image for craft work,
    the rare occasion I have to thread a needle, etc.

    You'll probably begin to have problems with reading when you get into
    your 40s or fairly soon if you're already there.

    Already well past the 40s. :-)
    No problems reading, whether screens or printed. Even the optician was impressed when I read the tiniest size print on his hand-held chart and
    said I had excellent vision when reading the distance chart. I don't
    remember when these glasses/lenses were last changed, but at least 30
    years ago (my original optician retired nearly 20 years ago and I had
    these glasses a good while before that).




    I like readers made by Foster-Grant you can buy on a stand alone
    display at Dollar General Stores, they're about $12 or $15 I guess.
    They're about as lightweight as possible -- just acrylic lenses and
    three pieces of aluminum -- and don't make indentations on the bridge
    of your nose.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From super70s@21:1/5 to Your Name on Sun Aug 10 21:33:31 2025
    On 2025-08-09 22:17:15 +0000, Your Name said:

    On 2025-08-09 14:21:42 +0000, super70s said:
    On 2025-07-03 06:18:29 +0000, Your Name said:
    On 2025-07-03 01:00:34 +0000, suzeeq said:
    On 7/2/2025 2:51 PM, Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-07-02 16:33:54 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
    https://youtu.be/HiCKzZHKOBs?si=EZMR6D6nhAG4XWqk

    Good video. She likes him a lot more than I do.

    My favorite part is when he takes off his glasses to look at nails. He >>>>>> takes off his glasses to see better. I had wondered if they were fake. >>>>>
    It depends on your vision.

    I'm short-sighted, so need glasses to see distance, but when working on >>>>> something small close-up, it is better to take my glasses off. This can >>>>> become more of a problem as people age, which is why they sometimes get >>>>> bifocals - the upper half of the lenses for long distance and the lower >>>>> half of the lenses for close work / reading.

    I'm the same way. I haven't worn my glasses for reading for decades.
    Whe I wear the contacts, I use cheap readers to read labels in the
    store, etc.

    Reading normal books and magazines is fine for me, but I do take my
    glasses off when doing really small things such as when cutting out
    tightly / cleanly around the outline of a small image for craft work,
    the rare occasion I have to thread a needle, etc.

    You'll probably begin to have problems with reading when you get into
    your 40s or fairly soon if you're already there.

    Already well past the 40s. :-)
    No problems reading, whether screens or printed. Even the optician was impressed when I read the tiniest size print on his hand-held chart and
    said I had excellent vision when reading the distance chart. I don't
    remember when these glasses/lenses were last changed, but at least 30
    years ago (my original optician retired nearly 20 years ago and I had
    these glasses a good while before that).

    Just going from personal experience, YMMV I guess. But it sounds like
    you need to wear glasses all the time, I only need them for reading. My
    late dad was the same way.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 11 19:29:08 2025
    On 2025-08-11 02:33:31 +0000, super70s said:
    On 2025-08-09 22:17:15 +0000, Your Name said:
    On 2025-08-09 14:21:42 +0000, super70s said:
    On 2025-07-03 06:18:29 +0000, Your Name said:
    On 2025-07-03 01:00:34 +0000, suzeeq said:
    On 7/2/2025 2:51 PM, Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-07-02 16:33:54 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
    https://youtu.be/HiCKzZHKOBs?si=EZMR6D6nhAG4XWqk

    Good video. She likes him a lot more than I do.

    My favorite part is when he takes off his glasses to look at nails. He >>>>>>> takes off his glasses to see better. I had wondered if they were fake. >>>>>>
    It depends on your vision.

    I'm short-sighted, so need glasses to see distance, but when working on >>>>>> something small close-up, it is better to take my glasses off. This can >>>>>> become more of a problem as people age, which is why they sometimes get >>>>>> bifocals - the upper half of the lenses for long distance and the lower >>>>>> half of the lenses for close work / reading.

    I'm the same way. I haven't worn my glasses for reading for decades. >>>>> Whe I wear the contacts, I use cheap readers to read labels in the
    store, etc.

    Reading normal books and magazines is fine for me, but I do take my
    glasses off when doing really small things such as when cutting out
    tightly / cleanly around the outline of a small image for craft work,
    the rare occasion I have to thread a needle, etc.

    You'll probably begin to have problems with reading when you get into
    your 40s or fairly soon if you're already there.

    Already well past the 40s. :-)
    No problems reading, whether screens or printed. Even the optician was
    impressed when I read the tiniest size print on his hand-held chart and
    said I had excellent vision when reading the distance chart. I don't
    remember when these glasses/lenses were last changed, but at least 30
    years ago (my original optician retired nearly 20 years ago and I had
    these glasses a good while before that).

    Just going from personal experience, YMMV I guess. But it sounds like
    you need to wear glasses all the time, I only need them for reading. My
    late dad was the same way.

    Yep, I've been wearing glasses all the time since primary / junior
    school. Most of that time I had the same optician and only changed when
    he retired.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From super70s@21:1/5 to Your Name on Mon Aug 11 07:07:16 2025
    On 2025-08-11 07:29:08 +0000, Your Name said:

    On 2025-08-11 02:33:31 +0000, super70s said:
    On 2025-08-09 22:17:15 +0000, Your Name said:
    On 2025-08-09 14:21:42 +0000, super70s said:
    On 2025-07-03 06:18:29 +0000, Your Name said:
    On 2025-07-03 01:00:34 +0000, suzeeq said:
    On 7/2/2025 2:51 PM, Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-07-02 16:33:54 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
    https://youtu.be/HiCKzZHKOBs?si=EZMR6D6nhAG4XWqk

    Good video. She likes him a lot more than I do.

    My favorite part is when he takes off his glasses to look at nails. He >>>>>>>> takes off his glasses to see better. I had wondered if they were fake. >>>>>>>
    It depends on your vision.

    I'm short-sighted, so need glasses to see distance, but when working on >>>>>>> something small close-up, it is better to take my glasses off. This can >>>>>>> become more of a problem as people age, which is why they sometimes get >>>>>>> bifocals - the upper half of the lenses for long distance and the lower >>>>>>> half of the lenses for close work / reading.

    I'm the same way. I haven't worn my glasses for reading for decades. >>>>>> Whe I wear the contacts, I use cheap readers to read labels in the >>>>>> store, etc.

    Reading normal books and magazines is fine for me, but I do take my
    glasses off when doing really small things such as when cutting out
    tightly / cleanly around the outline of a small image for craft work, >>>>> the rare occasion I have to thread a needle, etc.

    You'll probably begin to have problems with reading when you get into
    your 40s or fairly soon if you're already there.

    Already well past the 40s. :-)
    No problems reading, whether screens or printed. Even the optician was
    impressed when I read the tiniest size print on his hand-held chart and
    said I had excellent vision when reading the distance chart. I don't
    remember when these glasses/lenses were last changed, but at least 30
    years ago (my original optician retired nearly 20 years ago and I had
    these glasses a good while before that).

    Just going from personal experience, YMMV I guess. But it sounds like
    you need to wear glasses all the time, I only need them for reading. My
    late dad was the same way.

    Yep, I've been wearing glasses all the time since primary / junior
    school. Most of that time I had the same optician and only changed when
    he retired.

    I had an optician from my teen years when it was determined I might
    have a slight case of astigmatism. Wore glasses he prescribed for it
    for short while but got rid of them. He recently died, lived to a ripe
    old age and even became mayor of the city at one point.

    Really I think I only chose to wear them because I thought it would be
    cool to have a pair John Lennon "granny glasses," lol.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to YourName@YourISP.com on Mon Aug 11 13:36:49 2025
    Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
    On 2025-08-11 02:33:31 +0000, super70s said:
    On 2025-08-09 22:17:15 +0000, Your Name said:
    On 2025-08-09 14:21:42 +0000, super70s said:
    On 2025-07-03 06:18:29 +0000, Your Name said:
    On 2025-07-03 01:00:34 +0000, suzeeq said:
    On 7/2/2025 2:51 PM, Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-07-02 16:33:54 +0000, anim8rfsk said:
    Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
    https://youtu.be/HiCKzZHKOBs?si=EZMR6D6nhAG4XWqk

    Good video. She likes him a lot more than I do.

    My favorite part is when he takes off his glasses to look at nails. He >>>>>>>> takes off his glasses to see better. I had wondered if they were fake. >>>>>>>
    It depends on your vision.

    I'm short-sighted, so need glasses to see distance, but when working on >>>>>>> something small close-up, it is better to take my glasses off. This can >>>>>>> become more of a problem as people age, which is why they sometimes get >>>>>>> bifocals - the upper half of the lenses for long distance and the lower >>>>>>> half of the lenses for close work / reading.

    I'm the same way. I haven't worn my glasses for reading for decades. >>>>>> Whe I wear the contacts, I use cheap readers to read labels in the >>>>>> store, etc.

    Reading normal books and magazines is fine for me, but I do take my
    glasses off when doing really small things such as when cutting out
    tightly / cleanly around the outline of a small image for craft work, >>>>> the rare occasion I have to thread a needle, etc.

    You'll probably begin to have problems with reading when you get into
    your 40s or fairly soon if you're already there.

    Already well past the 40s. :-)
    No problems reading, whether screens or printed. Even the optician was
    impressed when I read the tiniest size print on his hand-held chart and
    said I had excellent vision when reading the distance chart. I don't
    remember when these glasses/lenses were last changed, but at least 30
    years ago (my original optician retired nearly 20 years ago and I had
    these glasses a good while before that).

    Just going from personal experience, YMMV I guess. But it sounds like
    you need to wear glasses all the time, I only need them for reading. My
    late dad was the same way.

    Yep, I've been wearing glasses all the time since primary / junior
    school. Most of that time I had the same optician and only changed when
    he retired.

    Diagnosed as nearsighted at age 5, first pair of glasses shortly
    thereafter. My father was friends with the optician as the two of them
    had businesses about a block away. We went to that optician till he
    closed. His son started an optical shop when he was in his 20s, bought
    his father's customers (whichever ones transferred over) and employed
    his father till he retired. I've been going there ever since.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mike Van Pelt@21:1/5 to All on Thu Aug 28 17:16:23 2025
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.movies.current-films

    Somehow, I have arrived at this point in my life without
    the sightest clue who Pedro Pascal might be.

    I suspect I may want to keep it that way.

    --
    Mike Van Pelt | "I don't advise it unless you're nuts."
    mvp at calweb.com | -- Ray Wilkinson, after riding out Hurricane
    KE6BVH | Ike on Surfside Beach in Galveston

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)