• German Awareness Campaign Blames White Germans for Sexual Assault Epide

    From BTR1701@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 13 19:17:51 2025
    Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of Peace to flood
    into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their barbarity with them, the German government has been trying to tackle the problem of brown men sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about everywhere. From public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the street in broad daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the predations of the Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon them against
    their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches to outright
    rape.

    The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent on committing slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it happens and the courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply 'culturally unaware' that rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim men have been sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually full-on raping women under this theory that they just don't know any better because they come from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages.

    Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this problem head-on with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters displayed in public places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual assault is a nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad behavior in action.

    The only problem?

    They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the migrants, instead of the other way around, the way it really happens literally 100% of the
    time:

    https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
    https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
    https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

    Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male sexual violence in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal aliens. It's really those horrible native German citizens who are assaulting the poor vulnerable migrants.

    Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus groping Muhammed's
    ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool. Apparently, the one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being raped by evil white women (and portly gay white men, too).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 13 16:19:39 2025
    On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of Peace to flood into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their barbarity with them, the German government has been trying to tackle the problem of brown men
    sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about everywhere. From public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the street in broad daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the predations of the Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon them against their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches to outright rape.

    The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent on committing slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it happens and the courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply 'culturally unaware' that rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim men have been sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually full-on raping women under this theory that they just don't know any better because they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages.

    Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this problem head-on
    with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters displayed in public places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual assault is a nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad behavior in action.

    The only problem?

    They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the migrants, instead
    of the other way around, the way it really happens literally 100% of the time:

    https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
    https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
    https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

    Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male sexual violence
    in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal aliens. It's really those horrible native German citizens who are assaulting the poor vulnerable migrants.

    Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus groping Muhammed's ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool. Apparently, the one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being raped by evil white women (and portly gay white men, too).

    "...this theory that they just don't know any better because they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages."

    What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Sun Jul 13 20:49:25 2025
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 1:19:39 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of Peace to flood >> into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their barbarity with
    them, the German government has been trying to tackle the problem of brown >> men
    sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about everywhere. From >> public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the street in broad
    daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the predations of the >> Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon them against >> their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches to outright
    rape.

    The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent on committing >> slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it happens and the >> courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply 'culturally unaware'
    that
    rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim men have been >> sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually full-on raping
    women under this theory that they just don't know any better because they >> come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages.

    Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this problem
    head-on
    with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters displayed in
    public
    places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual assault is a >> nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad behavior in >> action.

    The only problem?

    They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the migrants,
    instead
    of the other way around, the way it really happens literally 100% of the
    time:

    https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
    https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
    https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

    Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male sexual
    violence
    in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal aliens. It's >> really those horrible native German citizens who are assaulting the poor
    vulnerable migrants.

    Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus groping Muhammed's >> ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool. Apparently, the
    one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being raped by evil >> white women (and portly gay white men, too).

    "...this theory that they just don't know any better because they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages."

    What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?

    Well, if it's true that they honestly don't know that violently raping women
    is wrong, if that's their cultural norm, then my position as a German citizen would be to STOP LETTING PEOPLE WHO HOLD THOSE VALUES INTO MY COUNTRY BY THE MILLIONS.

    How about we try that for a while and see how it works?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 13 18:07:58 2025
    On 7/13/2025 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 1:19:39 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of Peace to flood
    into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their barbarity with
    them, the German government has been trying to tackle the problem of brown
    men
    sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about everywhere. From >>> public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the street in broad
    daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the predations of the >>> Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon them against >>> their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches to outright >>> rape.

    The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent on committing
    slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it happens and the
    courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply 'culturally unaware' >>> that
    rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim men have been >>> sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually full-on raping
    women under this theory that they just don't know any better because they >>> come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages.

    Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this problem >>> head-on
    with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters displayed in >>> public
    places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual assault is a
    nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad behavior in
    action.

    The only problem?

    They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the migrants, >>> instead
    of the other way around, the way it really happens literally 100% of the >>> time:

    https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
    https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
    https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

    Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male sexual
    violence
    in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal aliens. It's >>> really those horrible native German citizens who are assaulting the poor >>> vulnerable migrants.

    Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus groping Muhammed's
    ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool. Apparently, the
    one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being raped by evil
    white women (and portly gay white men, too).

    "...this theory that they just don't know any better because they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages."

    What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?

    Well, if it's true that they honestly don't know that violently raping women is wrong, if that's their cultural norm, then my position as a German citizen would be to STOP LETTING PEOPLE WHO HOLD THOSE VALUES INTO MY COUNTRY BY THE MILLIONS.

    How about we try that for a while and see how it works?

    Unfortunately, that smacks of discrimination based on de facto religious
    values ...which has an atrocious history of its own. My point is simply
    that easy answers are usually neither.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Sun Jul 13 22:26:36 2025
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 3:07:58 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/13/2025 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 1:19:39 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>
    On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of Peace to flood
    into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their barbarity >>>> with
    them, the German government has been trying to tackle the problem of brown
    men
    sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about everywhere. From
    public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the street in >>>> broad
    daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the predations of the
    Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon them against
    their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches to outright
    rape.

    The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent on
    committing
    slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it happens and >>>> the
    courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply 'culturally unaware'
    that
    rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim men have been
    sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually full-on >>>> raping
    women under this theory that they just don't know any better because they
    come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages.

    Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this problem >>>> head-on
    with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters displayed in >>>> public
    places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual assault is a
    nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad behavior in
    action.

    The only problem?

    They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the migrants, >>>> instead
    of the other way around, the way it really happens literally 100% of the
    time:

    https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
    https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
    https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

    Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male sexual >>>> violence
    in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal aliens. It's
    really those horrible native German citizens who are assaulting the poor
    vulnerable migrants.

    Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus groping
    Muhammed's
    ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool.
    Apparently, the
    one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being raped by evil
    white women (and portly gay white men, too).

    "...this theory that they just don't know any better because they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages."

    What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?

    Well, if it's true that they honestly don't know that violently raping women
    is wrong, if that's their cultural norm, then my position as a German
    citizen
    would be to STOP LETTING PEOPLE WHO HOLD THOSE VALUES INTO MY COUNTRY BY THE
    MILLIONS.

    How about we try that for a while and see how it works?

    Unfortunately, that smacks of discrimination based on de facto religious values ...which has an atrocious history of its own.

    If your religious values hold women in such low esteem that rape is considered a right for men to exercise casually at their whim, then keep that religion
    the fuck out of my country. It deserves to be discriminated against.

    Where is it written that we must accommodate and tolerate any and all savagery merely because it's done under the imprimatur of religion?

    Would a bunch of neo-Aztecs have a valid discrimination complaint if we banned them because of their curious habit of ripping the still-beating hearts out of children to appease their gods? Is that something we'd be required to tolerate and embrace so that no one will point at us and say 'bigot'?

    My point is simply that easy answers are usually neither.

    Well, it's certainly no answer to put up a bunch of posters portraying the white people as the rapists and molesters and the immigrants as the victims.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 13 19:00:56 2025
    On 7/13/2025 6:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 3:07:58 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/13/2025 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 1:19:39 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>
    On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of Peace to flood
    into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their barbarity
    with
    them, the German government has been trying to tackle the problem of brown
    men
    sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about everywhere. From
    public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the street in
    broad
    daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the predations of the
    Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon them against
    their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches to outright
    rape.

    The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent on >>>>> committing
    slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it happens and
    the
    courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply 'culturally unaware'
    that
    rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim men have been
    sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually full-on >>>>> raping
    women under this theory that they just don't know any better because they
    come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages.

    Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this problem
    head-on
    with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters displayed in
    public
    places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual assault is a
    nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad behavior in
    action.

    The only problem?

    They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the migrants,
    instead
    of the other way around, the way it really happens literally 100% of the
    time:

    https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
    https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
    https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

    Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male sexual >>>>> violence
    in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal aliens. It's
    really those horrible native German citizens who are assaulting the poor
    vulnerable migrants.

    Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus groping >>>>> Muhammed's
    ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool.
    Apparently, the
    one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being raped by evil
    white women (and portly gay white men, too).

    "...this theory that they just don't know any better because they come >>>> from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages."

    What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?

    Well, if it's true that they honestly don't know that violently raping women
    is wrong, if that's their cultural norm, then my position as a German
    citizen
    would be to STOP LETTING PEOPLE WHO HOLD THOSE VALUES INTO MY COUNTRY BY THE
    MILLIONS.

    How about we try that for a while and see how it works?

    Unfortunately, that smacks of discrimination based on de facto religious
    values ...which has an atrocious history of its own.

    If your religious values hold women in such low esteem that rape is considered
    a right for men to exercise casually at their whim, then keep that religion the fuck out of my country. It deserves to be discriminated against.

    Where is it written that we must accommodate and tolerate any and all savagery
    merely because it's done under the imprimatur of religion?

    Would a bunch of neo-Aztecs have a valid discrimination complaint if we banned
    them because of their curious habit of ripping the still-beating hearts out of
    children to appease their gods? Is that something we'd be required to tolerate
    and embrace so that no one will point at us and say 'bigot'?

    My point is simply that easy answers are usually neither.

    Well, it's certainly no answer to put up a bunch of posters portraying the white people as the rapists and molesters and the immigrants as the victims.

    How will you word your exclusion measure?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Mon Jul 14 00:06:33 2025
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 4:00:56 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/13/2025 6:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 3:07:58 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>
    On 7/13/2025 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 1:19:39 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of Peace >>>>>> to flood
    into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their barbarity
    with
    them, the German government has been trying to tackle the problem >>>>>> of brown
    men
    sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about
    everywhere. From
    public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the street in
    broad
    daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the predations >>>>>> of the
    Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon them >>>>>> against
    their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches to outright
    rape.

    The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent on >>>>>> committing
    slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it happens and
    the
    courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply 'culturally unaware'
    that
    rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim men >>>>>> have been
    sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually full-on
    raping
    women under this theory that they just don't know any better
    because they
    come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages.

    Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this problem
    head-on
    with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters displayed in
    public
    places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual >>>>>> assault is a
    nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad >>>>>> behavior in
    action.

    The only problem?

    They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the migrants,
    instead
    of the other way around, the way it really happens literally 100% of the
    time:

    https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
    https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
    https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

    Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male sexual
    violence
    in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal
    aliens. It's
    really those horrible native German citizens who are assaulting the poor
    vulnerable migrants.

    Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus groping >>>>>> Muhammed's
    ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool.
    Apparently, the
    one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being raped >>>>>> by evil
    white women (and portly gay white men, too).

    "...this theory that they just don't know any better because they come >>>>> from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages."

    What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?

    Well, if it's true that they honestly don't know that violently raping >>>> women
    is wrong, if that's their cultural norm, then my position as a German >>>> citizen
    would be to STOP LETTING PEOPLE WHO HOLD THOSE VALUES INTO MY COUNTRY >>>> BY THE
    MILLIONS.

    How about we try that for a while and see how it works?

    Unfortunately, that smacks of discrimination based on de facto religious >>> values ...which has an atrocious history of its own.

    If your religious values hold women in such low esteem that rape is
    considered
    a right for men to exercise casually at their whim, then keep that religion >> the fuck out of my country. It deserves to be discriminated against.

    Where is it written that we must accommodate and tolerate any and all
    savagery
    merely because it's done under the imprimatur of religion?

    Would a bunch of neo-Aztecs have a valid discrimination complaint if we
    banned
    them because of their curious habit of ripping the still-beating hearts out >> of
    children to appease their gods? Is that something we'd be required to
    tolerate
    and embrace so that no one will point at us and say 'bigot'?

    My point is simply that easy answers are usually neither.

    Well, it's certainly no answer to put up a bunch of posters portraying the >> white people as the rapists and molesters and the immigrants as the victims.

    How will you word your exclusion measure?

    Simple: "The border is closed to immigrants immediately and will remain in effect indefinitely. We have enough people. We don't need more."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 13 22:35:44 2025
    On 7/13/2025 8:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 4:00:56 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/13/2025 6:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 3:07:58 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>
    On 7/13/2025 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 1:19:39 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of Peace >>>>>>> to flood
    into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their barbarity
    with
    them, the German government has been trying to tackle the problem >>>>>>> of brown
    men
    sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about
    everywhere. From
    public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the street in
    broad
    daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the predations
    of the
    Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon them >>>>>>> against
    their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches to outright
    rape.

    The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent on >>>>>>> committing
    slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it happens and
    the
    courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply 'culturally unaware'
    that
    rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim men >>>>>>> have been
    sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually full-on
    raping
    women under this theory that they just don't know any better >>>>>>> because they
    come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages. >>>>>>>
    Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this problem
    head-on
    with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters displayed in
    public
    places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual >>>>>>> assault is a
    nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad >>>>>>> behavior in
    action.

    The only problem?

    They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the migrants,
    instead
    of the other way around, the way it really happens literally 100% of the
    time:

    https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
    https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
    https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

    Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male sexual
    violence
    in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal >>>>>>> aliens. It's
    really those horrible native German citizens who are assaulting the poor
    vulnerable migrants.

    Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus groping >>>>>>> Muhammed's
    ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool. >>>>>>> Apparently, the
    one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being raped
    by evil
    white women (and portly gay white men, too).

    "...this theory that they just don't know any better because they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages."

    What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?

    Well, if it's true that they honestly don't know that violently raping
    women
    is wrong, if that's their cultural norm, then my position as a German >>>>> citizen
    would be to STOP LETTING PEOPLE WHO HOLD THOSE VALUES INTO MY COUNTRY >>>>> BY THE
    MILLIONS.

    How about we try that for a while and see how it works?

    Unfortunately, that smacks of discrimination based on de facto religious >>>> values ...which has an atrocious history of its own.

    If your religious values hold women in such low esteem that rape is
    considered
    a right for men to exercise casually at their whim, then keep that religion
    the fuck out of my country. It deserves to be discriminated against.

    Where is it written that we must accommodate and tolerate any and all
    savagery
    merely because it's done under the imprimatur of religion?

    Would a bunch of neo-Aztecs have a valid discrimination complaint if we >>> banned
    them because of their curious habit of ripping the still-beating hearts out
    of
    children to appease their gods? Is that something we'd be required to
    tolerate
    and embrace so that no one will point at us and say 'bigot'?

    My point is simply that easy answers are usually neither.

    Well, it's certainly no answer to put up a bunch of posters portraying the
    white people as the rapists and molesters and the immigrants as the victims.

    How will you word your exclusion measure?

    Simple: "The border is closed to immigrants immediately and will remain in effect indefinitely. We have enough people. We don't need more."

    You'll turn away all immigrants because you find some objectionable?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to Melissa Hollingsworth on Sun Jul 13 22:36:55 2025
    On 7/13/2025 8:06 PM, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
    Verily, in article <1051dr8$30p3a$1@dont-email.me>, did
    nobody@nowhere.com deliver unto us this message:
    How will you word your exclusion measure?


    What if some population shouldn't be admitted because it had a much
    higher proclivity for murder? I'm sure we'd come up with something then. Let's do that.

    Again, how will you word that measure?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Mon Jul 14 04:36:59 2025
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 7:36:55 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/13/2025 8:06 PM, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
    Verily, in article <1051dr8$30p3a$1@dont-email.me>, did
    nobody@nowhere.com deliver unto us this message:
    How will you word your exclusion measure?


    What if some population shouldn't be admitted because it had a much
    higher proclivity for murder? I'm sure we'd come up with something then.
    Let's do that.

    Again, how will you word that measure?

    Instruct the Bureau of Statistics to produce a breakdown on all migrant rapes and sexual assaults in Germany for the past 10 years, broken down by country
    of origin, then put a halt on immigrants from the countries that are most responsible for exporting their savage culture to Germany.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Mon Jul 14 04:34:29 2025
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 7:35:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/13/2025 8:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 4:00:56 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>
    On 7/13/2025 6:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 3:07:58 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/13/2025 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 1:19:39 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>>> wrote:

    On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of Peace
    to flood
    into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their >>>>>>>> barbarity
    with
    them, the German government has been trying to tackle the problem
    of brown
    men
    sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about >>>>>>>> everywhere. From
    public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the street in
    broad
    daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the predations
    of the
    Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon them
    against
    their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches to >>>>>>>> outright
    rape.

    The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent on
    committing
    slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it >>>>>>>> happens and
    the
    courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply 'culturally >>>>>>>> unaware'
    that
    rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim men >>>>>>>> have been
    sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually full-on
    raping
    women under this theory that they just don't know any better >>>>>>>> because they
    come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages. >>>>>>>>
    Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this problem
    head-on
    with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters displayed in
    public
    places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual >>>>>>>> assault is a
    nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad >>>>>>>> behavior in
    action.

    The only problem?

    They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the migrants,
    instead
    of the other way around, the way it really happens literally >>>>>>>> 100% of the
    time:

    https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
    https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
    https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

    Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male sexual
    violence
    in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal >>>>>>>> aliens. It's
    really those horrible native German citizens who are assaulting >>>>>>>> the poor
    vulnerable migrants.

    Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus groping
    Muhammed's
    ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool. >>>>>>>> Apparently, the
    one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being raped
    by evil
    white women (and portly gay white men, too).

    "...this theory that they just don't know any better because they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages." >>>>>>>
    What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?

    Well, if it's true that they honestly don't know that violently raping
    women
    is wrong, if that's their cultural norm, then my position as a German
    citizen
    would be to STOP LETTING PEOPLE WHO HOLD THOSE VALUES INTO MY COUNTRY
    BY THE
    MILLIONS.

    How about we try that for a while and see how it works?

    Unfortunately, that smacks of discrimination based on de facto religious
    values ...which has an atrocious history of its own.

    If your religious values hold women in such low esteem that rape is >>>> considered
    a right for men to exercise casually at their whim, then keep that
    religion
    the fuck out of my country. It deserves to be discriminated against. >>>>
    Where is it written that we must accommodate and tolerate any and all >>>> savagery
    merely because it's done under the imprimatur of religion?

    Would a bunch of neo-Aztecs have a valid discrimination complaint if we >>>> banned
    them because of their curious habit of ripping the still-beating hearts >>>> out
    of
    children to appease their gods? Is that something we'd be required to >>>> tolerate
    and embrace so that no one will point at us and say 'bigot'?

    My point is simply that easy answers are usually neither.

    Well, it's certainly no answer to put up a bunch of posters portraying the
    white people as the rapists and molesters and the immigrants as the >>>> victims.

    How will you word your exclusion measure?

    Simple: "The border is closed to immigrants immediately and will remain in >> effect indefinitely. We have enough people. We don't need more."

    You'll turn away all immigrants because you find some objectionable?

    I'd turn them away because the country is already awash with way too many. No country is obligated, either morally or legally, to just take all comers.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to atropos@mac.com on Mon Jul 14 04:47:04 2025
    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

    . . .

    If your religious values hold women in such low esteem that rape
    is considered a right for men to exercise casually at their whim,
    then keep that religion the fuck out of my country. It deserves to be >discriminated against.

    Where is it written that we must accommodate and tolerate any and all >savagery merely because it's done under the imprimatur of religion?

    This remains my concern with the elevation of the right of free exercise
    of religion in Supreme Court rulings over the last several decades, even
    when I agree with the outcome in a case like Mahmoud v. Taylor (2025)
    since religion may not respect the right of conscience of everybody
    else. I know you disagree.

    It's the 100th anniversary of the Scopes "Monkey Trial". A historian
    pointed out that laws promoted by William Jennings Bryan prohibiting the teaching of evolution were comparable to Mahmoud, in that they protected
    the right of parents to raise their children in their own religion what
    with compulsory education through high school being brand new at the
    time when the theory of evolution would have been taught. In some
    states, it was prohibited to teach the theory to college students in
    state schools.

    However, Scopes' conviction was appealed on Establishment Clause
    violation, not Free Exercise, and the Warren Court finally found such a
    law unconstitutional in 1968 as an Establishment Clause violation.

    Would a bunch of neo-Aztecs have a valid discrimination complaint if we >banned them because of their curious habit of ripping the still-beating >hearts out of children to appease their gods? Is that something we'd be >required to tolerate and embrace so that no one will point at us and say >'bigot'?

    When I was a kid, they were still tossing virgins into the volcano to
    appease the gods. I miss those days. It was so much easier to get laid.

    My point is simply that easy answers are usually neither.

    Well, it's certainly no answer to put up a bunch of posters portraying the >white people as the rapists and molesters and the immigrants as the victims.

    Mean people were calling the rapists, well, rapists.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to Adam H. Kerman on Mon Jul 14 06:20:32 2025
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 9:47:04 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

    . . .

    If your religious values hold women in such low esteem that rape
    is considered a right for men to exercise casually at their whim,
    then keep that religion the fuck out of my country. It deserves to be
    discriminated against.

    Where is it written that we must accommodate and tolerate any and all
    savagery merely because it's done under the imprimatur of religion?

    This remains my concern with the elevation of the right of free exercise
    of religion in Supreme Court rulings over the last several decades, even
    when I agree with the outcome in a case like Mahmoud v. Taylor (2025)
    since religion may not respect the right of conscience of everybody
    else. I know you disagree.

    We needn't even reach those issues because foreign nationals in other
    countries do not have a constitutional right to immigrate to the U.S. The government can decide if and how many immigrants it wants to admit from other countries and can use virtually any criteria it likes in doing so.

    It's the 100th anniversary of the Scopes "Monkey Trial". A historian
    pointed out that laws promoted by William Jennings Bryan prohibiting the teaching of evolution were comparable to Mahmoud, in that they protected
    the right of parents to raise their children in their own religion what
    with compulsory education through high school being brand new at the
    time when the theory of evolution would have been taught. In some
    states, it was prohibited to teach the theory to college students in
    state schools.

    However, Scopes' conviction was appealed on Establishment Clause
    violation, not Free Exercise, and the Warren Court finally found such a
    law unconstitutional in 1968 as an Establishment Clause violation.

    Would a bunch of neo-Aztecs have a valid discrimination complaint if we
    banned them because of their curious habit of ripping the still-beating
    hearts out of children to appease their gods? Is that something we'd be
    required to tolerate and embrace so that no one will point at us and say
    'bigot'?

    When I was a kid, they were still tossing virgins into the volcano to
    appease the gods. I miss those days. It was so much easier to get laid.

    My point is simply that easy answers are usually neither.

    Well, it's certainly no answer to put up a bunch of posters portraying the >> white people as the rapists and molesters and the immigrants as the victims.

    Mean people were calling the rapists, well, rapists.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to moviePig on Mon Jul 14 09:54:41 2025
    On 2025-07-13 4:19 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of Peace to
    flood
    into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their
    barbarity with
    them, the German government has been trying to tackle the problem of
    brown men
    sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about everywhere. From
    public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the street in
    broad
    daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the predations of the
    Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon them against
    their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches to outright
    rape.

    The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent on
    committing
    slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it happens
    and the
    courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply 'culturally
    unaware' that
    rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim men have been
    sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually full-on
    raping
    women under this theory that they just don't know any better because
    they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages.

    Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this problem
    head-on
    with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters displayed in
    public
    places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual assault
    is a
    nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad
    behavior in
    action.

    The only problem?

    They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the migrants,
    instead
    of the other way around, the way it really happens literally 100% of the
    time:

    https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
    https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
    https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

    Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male sexual
    violence
    in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal aliens. It's
    really those horrible native German citizens who are assaulting the poor
    vulnerable migrants.

    Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus groping
    Muhammed's
    ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool.
    Apparently, the
    one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being raped by
    evil
    white women (and portly gay white men, too).

    "...this theory that they just don't know any better because they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages."

    What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?


    The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The offenders in
    these cases are told by their religion that women that don't dress
    modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how strict their
    particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and aren't entitled to any respect from men. Pulling off their swimsuits - top or bottom - is
    perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing man.

    In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own
    women-only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will swim
    (or walk around outside the house) without having her hair covered
    because Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven mad with lust
    at the sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be held responsible for
    acting on that lust.

    A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be
    assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs.

    I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years back
    where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his phone to
    the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him on public
    transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual activity with the
    German word "ficken", which means fuck in English.

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 14 10:05:06 2025
    On 2025-07-13 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 1:19:39 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of Peace to flood
    into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their barbarity with
    them, the German government has been trying to tackle the problem of brown
    men
    sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about everywhere. From >>> public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the street in broad
    daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the predations of the >>> Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon them against >>> their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches to outright >>> rape.

    The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent on committing
    slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it happens and the
    courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply 'culturally unaware' >>> that
    rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim men have been >>> sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually full-on raping
    women under this theory that they just don't know any better because they >>> come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages.

    Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this problem >>> head-on
    with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters displayed in >>> public
    places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual assault is a
    nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad behavior in
    action.

    The only problem?

    They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the migrants, >>> instead
    of the other way around, the way it really happens literally 100% of the >>> time:

    https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
    https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
    https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

    Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male sexual
    violence
    in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal aliens. It's >>> really those horrible native German citizens who are assaulting the poor >>> vulnerable migrants.

    Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus groping Muhammed's
    ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool. Apparently, the
    one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being raped by evil
    white women (and portly gay white men, too).
    .
    "...this theory that they just don't know any better because they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages."

    What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?

    Well, if it's true that they honestly don't know that violently raping women is wrong, if that's their cultural norm, then my position as a German citizen would be to STOP LETTING PEOPLE WHO HOLD THOSE VALUES INTO MY COUNTRY BY THE MILLIONS.

    How about we try that for a while and see how it works?


    If I was running Germany, I'd make it a condition for admission to the
    country, even as a refugee, that someone sit down with them and explain
    (via an interpreter) that it is extremely offensive to German society to
    molest women, describing all the different forms of molestation, and
    that there will be major specified consequences if they do. Make sure
    they repeat a detailed acknowledgement to that fact in their own
    language, record it, and archive it, all keyed on their fingerprints or
    other biometric. If they've done that - and satisfied all the other
    rules for entry into Germany - they can come into Germany.

    If, at some future time, they are implicated in some kind of
    molestation, whether it is pulling down a woman's swimsuit in the pool
    or rape or anything else, their recording can be vital evidence in court showing that they DID know that these behaviours were not cool and went
    ahead anyway. Then they can be imprisoned and/or deported and no one can
    play the "poor little lamb just didn't know it was wrong" card.

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 14 11:51:06 2025
    On 7/14/2025 12:34 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 7:35:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/13/2025 8:06 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 4:00:56 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>
    On 7/13/2025 6:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 3:07:58 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/13/2025 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 1:19:39 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
    wrote:

    On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of Peace
    to flood
    into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their >>>>>>>>> barbarity
    with
    them, the German government has been trying to tackle the problem
    of brown
    men
    sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about >>>>>>>>> everywhere. From
    public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the street in
    broad
    daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the predations
    of the
    Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon them
    against
    their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches to
    outright
    rape.

    The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent on
    committing
    slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it >>>>>>>>> happens and
    the
    courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply 'culturally
    unaware'
    that
    rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim men
    have been
    sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually full-on
    raping
    women under this theory that they just don't know any better >>>>>>>>> because they
    come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages. >>>>>>>>>
    Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this problem
    head-on
    with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters displayed in
    public
    places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual >>>>>>>>> assault is a
    nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad
    behavior in
    action.

    The only problem?

    They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the migrants,
    instead
    of the other way around, the way it really happens literally >>>>>>>>> 100% of the
    time:

    https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
    https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
    https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

    Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male sexual
    violence
    in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal >>>>>>>>> aliens. It's
    really those horrible native German citizens who are assaulting
    the poor
    vulnerable migrants.

    Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus groping
    Muhammed's
    ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool. >>>>>>>>> Apparently, the
    one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being raped
    by evil
    white women (and portly gay white men, too).

    "...this theory that they just don't know any better because they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages." >>>>>>>>
    What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?

    Well, if it's true that they honestly don't know that violently raping
    women
    is wrong, if that's their cultural norm, then my position as a German
    citizen
    would be to STOP LETTING PEOPLE WHO HOLD THOSE VALUES INTO MY COUNTRY
    BY THE
    MILLIONS.

    How about we try that for a while and see how it works?

    Unfortunately, that smacks of discrimination based on de facto religious
    values ...which has an atrocious history of its own.

    If your religious values hold women in such low esteem that rape is >>>>> considered
    a right for men to exercise casually at their whim, then keep that >>>>> religion
    the fuck out of my country. It deserves to be discriminated against. >>>>>
    Where is it written that we must accommodate and tolerate any and all >>>>> savagery
    merely because it's done under the imprimatur of religion?

    Would a bunch of neo-Aztecs have a valid discrimination complaint if we
    banned
    them because of their curious habit of ripping the still-beating hearts
    out
    of
    children to appease their gods? Is that something we'd be required to >>>>> tolerate
    and embrace so that no one will point at us and say 'bigot'?

    My point is simply that easy answers are usually neither.

    Well, it's certainly no answer to put up a bunch of posters portraying the
    white people as the rapists and molesters and the immigrants as the >>>>> victims.

    How will you word your exclusion measure?

    Simple: "The border is closed to immigrants immediately and will remain in
    effect indefinitely. We have enough people. We don't need more."

    You'll turn away all immigrants because you find some objectionable?

    I'd turn them away because the country is already awash with way too many. No country is obligated, either morally or legally, to just take all comers.

    If I'm not mistaken, you began with the intent to exclude rapists and
    then, out of convenience, found a rationale to exclude everyone.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 14 11:54:18 2025
    On 7/14/2025 12:36 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 7:36:55 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/13/2025 8:06 PM, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
    Verily, in article <1051dr8$30p3a$1@dont-email.me>, did
    nobody@nowhere.com deliver unto us this message:
    How will you word your exclusion measure?


    What if some population shouldn't be admitted because it had a much
    higher proclivity for murder? I'm sure we'd come up with something then. >>> Let's do that.

    Again, how will you word that measure?

    Instruct the Bureau of Statistics to produce a breakdown on all migrant rapes and sexual assaults in Germany for the past 10 years, broken down by country of origin, then put a halt on immigrants from the countries that are most responsible for exporting their savage culture to Germany.

    If statistical generalizations are acceptable, why not just bar men?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to Rhino on Mon Jul 14 12:09:00 2025
    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-13 4:19 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of Peace to
    flood
    into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their
    barbarity with
    them, the German government has been trying to tackle the problem of
    brown men
    sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about everywhere.
    From
    public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the street
    in broad
    daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the predations of
    the
    Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon them
    against
    their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches to outright >>> rape.

    The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent on
    committing
    slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it happens
    and the
    courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply 'culturally
    unaware' that
    rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim men have
    been
    sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually full-on
    raping
    women under this theory that they just don't know any better because
    they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages.

    Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this
    problem head-on
    with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters displayed
    in public
    places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual assault
    is a
    nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad
    behavior in
    action.

    The only problem?

    They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the
    migrants, instead
    of the other way around, the way it really happens literally 100% of the >>> time:

    https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
    https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
    https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

    Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male sexual
    violence
    in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal aliens.
    It's
    really those horrible native German citizens who are assaulting the poor >>> vulnerable migrants.

    Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus groping
    Muhammed's
    ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool.
    Apparently, the
    one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being raped by
    evil
    white women (and portly gay white men, too).

    "...this theory that they just don't know any better because they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages."

    What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?


    The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The offenders in
    these cases are told by their religion that women that don't dress
    modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how strict their particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and aren't entitled to any respect from men. Pulling off their swimsuits - top or bottom - is
    perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing man.

    In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own women-
    only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will swim (or walk around outside the house) without having her hair covered because
    Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven mad with lust at the
    sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be held responsible for acting
    on that lust.

    A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be
    assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs.

    I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years back
    where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his phone to
    the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him on public
    transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual activity with the
    German word "ficken", which means fuck in English.

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman that
    its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous neglect.
    Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their boobs in a
    supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast principled stones?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to atropos@mac.com on Mon Jul 14 16:45:07 2025
    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
    Jul 13, 2025 at 9:47:04 PM PDT, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

    . . .

    If your religious values hold women in such low esteem that rape
    is considered a right for men to exercise casually at their whim,
    then keep that religion the fuck out of my country. It deserves to be >>>discriminated against.

    Where is it written that we must accommodate and tolerate any and all >>>savagery merely because it's done under the imprimatur of religion?

    This remains my concern with the elevation of the right of free exercise
    of religion in Supreme Court rulings over the last several decades, even >>when I agree with the outcome in a case like Mahmoud v. Taylor (2025)
    since religion may not respect the right of conscience of everybody
    else. I know you disagree.

    We needn't even reach those issues because foreign nationals in other >countries do not have a constitutional right to immigrate to the U.S. The >government can decide if and how many immigrants it wants to admit from other >countries and can use virtually any criteria it likes in doing so.

    I made comments because you started this very thread in which government propaganda is attempting to gaslight the public about who committed
    specific crimes, and when government was actually confronted with who
    the perpetrators were, there was further gaslighting that the crimes
    were understandable as a matter of cultural differences based in part on religion.

    I raised examples in United States law with respect to religion because
    of my own deep suspicions about not prohibiting free exercise of
    religion when said exercise denies third parties freedom of conscience
    or the freedom to act.

    What the hell does the Immigration and Nationalty Act have to do with
    anything? If the conduct in question occurs in the United States, then
    our laws apply.

    If the civil liberty of freedom of religion trumps enforcement of
    criminal law, especially crimes against the person, possibly the foreign national may be deportable but if he's not prosecuted to the full extent
    of the law, it's a miscarriage of justice.

    Whether immigration law was violated is a secondary issue. The primary
    issue here is failure of the German legal system to seek justice on
    behalf of victims, a failure based on an elevated protected status for
    the perpetrator and an inferior protected status for the victim.

    I don't want foreign nationals who have committed dangerous crimes
    deported without first having been prosecuted, convicted, and served a
    time of incarceration. If they don't get prosecuted, then they become
    eligible to return to your country after deportation and remaining
    outside the country for a period of years. That's further outrage.

    Prosecution is the only way to make them ineligible to return, even as a traveller and not an immigrant.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to Rhino on Mon Jul 14 16:59:33 2025
    Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    , , ,

    If I was running Germany, I'd make it a condition for admission to the >country, even as a refugee, that someone sit down with them and explain
    (via an interpreter) that it is extremely offensive to German society to >molest women, describing all the different forms of molestation, and
    that there will be major specified consequences if they do. Make sure
    they repeat a detailed acknowledgement to that fact in their own
    language, record it, and archive it, all keyed on their fingerprints or
    other biometric. If they've done that - and satisfied all the other
    rules for entry into Germany - they can come into Germany.

    I would impart this clue by swinging a LART against the side of the head
    as hard as possible. If the clue bounces without penetrating, then the
    refugee or asylum seeker simply is not eligible for admission.

    I'm sorry but someone who grew up in a religion and culture with such
    contempt for women is not going to change his attitude of contempt just
    from having such a discussion. The problem is that where they come from,
    women have no autonomy and cannot go out in public without supervision
    from a father, husband, brother, or other male relative. Furthermore,
    they come from a sexually-repressed society.

    They show up in Germany in which young women are free to walk around unsupervised, who show a lot of skin and generally do not repress their sexuality. The perpetrator who has likely never had sex sees nothing but
    sinful behavior. These women are not human beings so raping them means
    that the perpetrator has not committed a crime against a person.

    If, at some future time, they are implicated in some kind of
    molestation, whether it is pulling down a woman's swimsuit in the pool
    or rape or anything else, their recording can be vital evidence in court >showing that they DID know that these behaviours were not cool and went
    ahead anyway. Then they can be imprisoned and/or deported and no one can
    play the "poor little lamb just didn't know it was wrong" card.

    But it's not the perpetrator who is claiming that he cannot be
    prosecuted for the criminal act on the basis of having grown up without
    Western values. Those making the claim are Germans, who grew up WITH
    Western values, who damn well know better.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Mon Jul 14 17:40:55 2025
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 8:54:18 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 12:36 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 7:36:55 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>
    On 7/13/2025 8:06 PM, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
    Verily, in article <1051dr8$30p3a$1@dont-email.me>, did
    nobody@nowhere.com deliver unto us this message:
    How will you word your exclusion measure?


    What if some population shouldn't be admitted because it had a much >>>> higher proclivity for murder? I'm sure we'd come up with something then.
    Let's do that.

    Again, how will you word that measure?

    Instruct the Bureau of Statistics to produce a breakdown on all migrant
    rapes
    and sexual assaults in Germany for the past 10 years, broken down by country
    of origin, then put a halt on immigrants from the countries that are most >> responsible for exporting their savage culture to Germany.

    If statistical generalizations are acceptable, why not just bar men?

    Okay.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to Adam H. Kerman on Mon Jul 14 17:51:21 2025
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 9:59:33 AM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

    Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
    , , ,
    If I was running Germany, I'd make it a condition for admission to the
    country, even as a refugee, that someone sit down with them and explain
    (via an interpreter) that it is extremely offensive to German society to
    molest women, describing all the different forms of molestation, and
    that there will be major specified consequences if they do. Make sure
    they repeat a detailed acknowledgement to that fact in their own
    language, record it, and archive it, all keyed on their fingerprints or
    other biometric. If they've done that - and satisfied all the other
    rules for entry into Germany - they can come into Germany.

    I would impart this clue by swinging a LART against the side of the head
    as hard as possible. If the clue bounces without penetrating, then the refugee or asylum seeker simply is not eligible for admission.

    I'm sorry but someone who grew up in a religion and culture with such contempt for women is not going to change his attitude of contempt just
    from having such a discussion. The problem is that where they come from, women have no autonomy and cannot go out in public without supervision
    from a father, husband, brother, or other male relative. Furthermore,
    they come from a sexually-repressed society.

    They show up in Germany in which young women are free to walk around unsupervised, who show a lot of skin and generally do not repress their sexuality. The perpetrator who has likely never had sex sees nothing but sinful behavior. These women are not human beings so raping them means
    that the perpetrator has not committed a crime against a person.

    And the German government responds by forgiving the rapist and telling its native born female citizens to start wearing hijabs and stop wearing shorts
    and crop tops and don't wear bikinis at public pools.

    As it is everywhere in the West, the politicians say it's *our* duty to accommodate our culture to theirs. We're the ones who are supposed to change
    to make *them* happy, not the other way around.

    If, at some future time, they are implicated in some kind of
    molestation, whether it is pulling down a woman's swimsuit in the pool
    or rape or anything else, their recording can be vital evidence in court
    showing that they DID know that these behaviours were not cool and went
    ahead anyway. Then they can be imprisoned and/or deported and no one can
    play the "poor little lamb just didn't know it was wrong" card.

    But it's not the perpetrator who is claiming that he cannot be
    prosecuted for the criminal act on the basis of having grown up without Western values. Those making the claim are Germans, who grew up WITH
    Western values, who damn well know better.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 14 17:47:37 2025
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 7:05:06 AM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    On 2025-07-13 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 1:19:39 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>
    On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of Peace to flood
    into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their barbarity >>>> with
    them, the German government has been trying to tackle the problem of brown
    men
    sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about everywhere. From
    public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the street in >>>> broad
    daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the predations of the
    Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon them against
    their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches to outright
    rape.

    The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent on
    committing
    slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it happens and >>>> the
    courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply 'culturally unaware'
    that
    rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim men have been
    sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually full-on >>>> raping
    women under this theory that they just don't know any better because they
    come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages.

    Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this problem >>>> head-on
    with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters displayed in >>>> public
    places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual assault is a
    nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad behavior in
    action.

    The only problem?

    They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the migrants, >>>> instead
    of the other way around, the way it really happens literally 100% of the
    time:

    https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
    https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
    https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

    Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male sexual >>>> violence
    in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal aliens. It's
    really those horrible native German citizens who are assaulting the poor
    vulnerable migrants.

    Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus groping
    Muhammed's
    ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool.
    Apparently, the
    one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being raped by evil
    white women (and portly gay white men, too).
    .
    "...this theory that they just don't know any better because they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages."

    What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?

    Well, if it's true that they honestly don't know that violently raping women
    is wrong, if that's their cultural norm, then my position as a German
    citizen
    would be to STOP LETTING PEOPLE WHO HOLD THOSE VALUES INTO MY COUNTRY BY THE
    MILLIONS.

    How about we try that for a while and see how it works?


    If I was running Germany, I'd make it a condition for admission to the country, even as a refugee, that someone sit down with them and explain
    (via an interpreter) that it is extremely offensive to German society to molest women, describing all the different forms of molestation, and
    that there will be major specified consequences if they do. Make sure
    they repeat a detailed acknowledgement to that fact in their own
    language, record it, and archive it, all keyed on their fingerprints or
    other biometric. If they've done that - and satisfied all the other
    rules for entry into Germany - they can come into Germany.

    As I said before, none of that is really needed, at least right now. Germany (like France and England and Ireland and Sweden and Norway), already has far too many 3rd-world immigrants as it stands. It's crushing their society, bankrupting their health care and welfare systems and bringing in a culture that's antithetical to (and incompatible with) Western values.

    So just stop importing people. Close the borders to immigrants for the next 10 years, then reevaluate and maybe open back up with the rules you suggest.

    If, at some future time, they are implicated in some kind of
    molestation, whether it is pulling down a woman's swimsuit in the pool
    or rape or anything else, their recording can be vital evidence in court showing that they DID know that these behaviours were not cool and went
    ahead anyway. Then they can be imprisoned and/or deported and no one can
    play the "poor little lamb just didn't know it was wrong" card.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Mon Jul 14 17:55:43 2025
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 9:09:00 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:

    The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The offenders in
    these cases are told by their religion that women that don't dress
    modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how strict their
    particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and aren't entitled to any
    respect from men. Pulling off their swimsuits - top or bottom - is
    perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing man.

    In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own women-
    only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will swim (or walk
    around outside the house) without having her hair covered because
    Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven mad with lust at the
    sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be held responsible for acting
    on that lust.

    A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be
    assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs.

    I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years back
    where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his phone to
    the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him on public
    transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual activity with the
    German word "ficken", which means fuck in English.

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman that
    its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous neglect.
    Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their boobs in a supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast principled stones?

    We're qualified because it's *our* country and we're entitled to have our own culture and norms. Any immigrant who wants to come here must adjust to us, not us to him.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 14 14:11:57 2025
    On 7/14/2025 1:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 9:09:00 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:

    The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The offenders in
    these cases are told by their religion that women that don't dress
    modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how strict their
    particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and aren't entitled to any >>> respect from men. Pulling off their swimsuits - top or bottom - is
    perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing man.

    In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own women- >>> only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will swim (or walk >>> around outside the house) without having her hair covered because
    Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven mad with lust at the >>> sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be held responsible for acting >>> on that lust.

    A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be
    assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs.

    I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years back
    where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his phone to
    the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him on public
    transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual activity with the
    German word "ficken", which means fuck in English.

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman that
    its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous neglect.
    Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their boobs in a
    supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast principled stones?

    We're qualified because it's *our* country and we're entitled to have our own culture and norms. Any immigrant who wants to come here must adjust to us, not
    us to him.

    ...which, afaics, boils down to "Might makes right".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Mon Jul 14 18:43:43 2025
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 11:11:57 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 1:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 9:09:00 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>
    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:

    The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The offenders in >>>> these cases are told by their religion that women that don't dress
    modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how strict their >>>> particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and aren't entitled to any
    respect from men. Pulling off their swimsuits - top or bottom - is
    perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing man.

    In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own women- >>>> only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will swim (or walk
    around outside the house) without having her hair covered because
    Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven mad with lust at the >>>> sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be held responsible for acting
    on that lust.

    A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be
    assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs.

    I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years back >>>> where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his phone to >>>> the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him on public >>>> transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual activity with the >>>> German word "ficken", which means fuck in English.

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman that
    its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous neglect.
    Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their boobs in a
    supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast principled stones?

    We're qualified because it's *our* country and we're entitled to have our >> own
    culture and norms. Any immigrant who wants to come here must adjust to us, >> not
    us to him.

    ...which, afaics, boils down to "Might makes right".

    No, it boils down to "If you don't like our country, culture, and norms,
    you're free to go elsewhere or stay where you are."

    But yes, we have the right and ability to decide who's allowed into our
    country and who's not because we have the strength to enforce it. If we
    didn't, they'd be called "invaders", not "immigrants", and it would be *them* who'd have the might.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to Melissa Hollingsworth on Mon Jul 14 20:10:22 2025
    Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
    Jul 14, 2025 at 9:09:00 AM PDT, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman that >>>>its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous neglect. >>>>Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their boobs in a >>>>supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast principled stones?

    It's probably because nobody's assaulting them.

    I'm not Woody Allen. I've never been assaulted by a naked breast.

    . . .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 14 16:11:44 2025
    On 7/14/2025 2:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 11:11:57 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 1:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 9:09:00 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>
    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:

    The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The offenders in >>>>> these cases are told by their religion that women that don't dress >>>>> modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how strict their >>>>> particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and aren't entitled to any
    respect from men. Pulling off their swimsuits - top or bottom - is >>>>> perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing man.

    In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own women-
    only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will swim (or walk
    around outside the house) without having her hair covered because >>>>> Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven mad with lust at the
    sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be held responsible for acting
    on that lust.

    A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be >>>>> assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs.

    I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years back >>>>> where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his phone to >>>>> the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him on public >>>>> transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual activity with the >>>>> German word "ficken", which means fuck in English.

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman that >>>> its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous neglect.
    Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their boobs in a
    supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast principled stones? >>>
    We're qualified because it's *our* country and we're entitled to have our >>> own
    culture and norms. Any immigrant who wants to come here must adjust to us,
    not
    us to him.

    ...which, afaics, boils down to "Might makes right".

    No, it boils down to "If you don't like our country, culture, and norms, you're free to go elsewhere or stay where you are."

    But yes, we have the right and ability to decide who's allowed into our country and who's not because we have the strength to enforce it. If we didn't, they'd be called "invaders", not "immigrants", and it would be *them* who'd have the might.

    We have any right we can enforce? Isn't that 'realpolitik'?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to atropos@mac.com on Mon Jul 14 20:03:52 2025
    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 9:59:33 AM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

    Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
    , , ,
    If I was running Germany, I'd make it a condition for admission to the
    country, even as a refugee, that someone sit down with them and explain
    (via an interpreter) that it is extremely offensive to German society to >>> molest women, describing all the different forms of molestation, and
    that there will be major specified consequences if they do. Make sure
    they repeat a detailed acknowledgement to that fact in their own
    language, record it, and archive it, all keyed on their fingerprints or
    other biometric. If they've done that - and satisfied all the other
    rules for entry into Germany - they can come into Germany.

    I would impart this clue by swinging a LART against the side of the head
    as hard as possible. If the clue bounces without penetrating, then the
    refugee or asylum seeker simply is not eligible for admission.

    I'm sorry but someone who grew up in a religion and culture with such
    contempt for women is not going to change his attitude of contempt just
    from having such a discussion. The problem is that where they come from,
    women have no autonomy and cannot go out in public without supervision
    from a father, husband, brother, or other male relative. Furthermore,
    they come from a sexually-repressed society.

    They show up in Germany in which young women are free to walk around
    unsupervised, who show a lot of skin and generally do not repress their
    sexuality. The perpetrator who has likely never had sex sees nothing but
    sinful behavior. These women are not human beings so raping them means
    that the perpetrator has not committed a crime against a person.

    And the German government responds by forgiving the rapist and telling its >native born female citizens to start wearing hijabs and stop wearing shorts >and crop tops and don't wear bikinis at public pools.

    In countries which utterly suppress women under Sharia Law, that's
    utterly prevented crimes from being perpetrated against girls and women,
    right? If she's a victim, she's not even allowed to be a complaining
    witness and her testimony will not be evidence for failure to have the
    crime witnessed by a sufficient number of men.

    But let's keep blaming the victim.

    As it is everywhere in the West, the politicians say it's *our* duty to >accommodate our culture to theirs. We're the ones who are supposed to change >to make *them* happy, not the other way around.

    How many rapes will be enough rapes to make them happy? Let's not find
    out.

    If, at some future time, they are implicated in some kind of
    molestation, whether it is pulling down a woman's swimsuit in the pool
    or rape or anything else, their recording can be vital evidence in court >>> showing that they DID know that these behaviours were not cool and went
    ahead anyway. Then they can be imprisoned and/or deported and no one can >>> play the "poor little lamb just didn't know it was wrong" card.

    But it's not the perpetrator who is claiming that he cannot be
    prosecuted for the criminal act on the basis of having grown up without
    Western values. Those making the claim are Germans, who grew up WITH
    Western values, who damn well know better.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Mon Jul 14 20:38:31 2025
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 1:11:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 2:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 11:11:57 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>
    On 7/14/2025 1:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 9:09:00 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:

    The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The offenders in
    these cases are told by their religion that women that don't dress >>>>>> modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how strict their
    particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and aren't entitled to any
    respect from men. Pulling off their swimsuits - top or bottom - is >>>>>> perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing man.

    In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own women-
    only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will swim (or walk
    around outside the house) without having her hair covered because >>>>>> Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven mad with lust at the
    sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be held responsible for acting
    on that lust.

    A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be >>>>>> assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs.

    I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years back
    where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his phone to
    the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him on public >>>>>> transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual activity with the >>>>>> German word "ficken", which means fuck in English.

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman that >>>>> its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous neglect. >>>>> Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their boobs in a >>>>> supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast principled stones? >>>>
    We're qualified because it's *our* country and we're entitled to have our
    own
    culture and norms. Any immigrant who wants to come here must adjust to us,
    not
    us to him.

    ...which, afaics, boils down to "Might makes right".

    No, it boils down to "If you don't like our country, culture, and norms,
    you're free to go elsewhere or stay where you are."

    But yes, we have the right and ability to decide who's allowed into our
    country and who's not because we have the strength to enforce it. If we
    didn't, they'd be called "invaders", not "immigrants", and it would be
    *them*
    who'd have the might.

    We have any right we can enforce?

    When it comes to who's entering our country, you'd best believe it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to Adam H. Kerman on Mon Jul 14 16:41:32 2025
    On 2025-07-14 12:59 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    , , ,

    If I was running Germany, I'd make it a condition for admission to the
    country, even as a refugee, that someone sit down with them and explain
    (via an interpreter) that it is extremely offensive to German society to
    molest women, describing all the different forms of molestation, and
    that there will be major specified consequences if they do. Make sure
    they repeat a detailed acknowledgement to that fact in their own
    language, record it, and archive it, all keyed on their fingerprints or
    other biometric. If they've done that - and satisfied all the other
    rules for entry into Germany - they can come into Germany.

    I would impart this clue by swinging a LART

    ?? What's a LART?

    against the side of the head
    as hard as possible. If the clue bounces without Ww, then the
    refugee or asylum seeker simply is not eligible for admission.

    I'm sorry but someone who grew up in a religion and culture with such contempt for women is not going to change his attitude of contempt just
    from having such a discussion.

    Agreed!! The *sole* purpose of this exercise is to make it IMPOSSIBLE
    for them to claim they didn't know it was a prosecutable offence to
    molest woman.

    The problem is that where they come from,
    women have no autonomy and cannot go out in public without supervision
    from a father, husband, brother, or other male relative. Furthermore,
    they come from a sexually-repressed society.

    They show up in Germany in which young women are free to walk around unsupervised, who show a lot of skin and generally do not repress their sexuality. The perpetrator who has likely never had sex sees nothing but sinful behavior. These women are not human beings so raping them means
    that the perpetrator has not committed a crime against a person.

    If, at some future time, they are implicated in some kind of
    molestation, whether it is pulling down a woman's swimsuit in the pool
    or rape or anything else, their recording can be vital evidence in court
    showing that they DID know that these behaviours were not cool and went
    ahead anyway. Then they can be imprisoned and/or deported and no one can
    play the "poor little lamb just didn't know it was wrong" card.

    But it's not the perpetrator who is claiming that he cannot be
    prosecuted for the criminal act on the basis of having grown up without Western values. Those making the claim are Germans, who grew up WITH
    Western values, who damn well know better.

    Agreed. Such Germans would surely dial back their concern that the
    immigrant simply didn't know it was wrong to harass women if they saw a recording of the immigrant saying clearly that he knows that such and
    such actions ARE illegal and prosecutable and potentially grounds for deportation. Those Germans are the ones being educated via this
    exercise. Once it is clear to them that the immigrant was acquainted
    with the rules, their level of sympathy for the offenders should be significantly reduced although some of the bleeding hearts will surely
    concoct still more preposterous theories about how the whole process
    still isn't fair and is racist.

    The education for the immigrant who commits these offenses comes in the
    form of the rumour mill - hearing about his friend Achmed who just got
    sent to the slammer for 10 years and his friend Mohammed who just got
    deported - and in his own reality where HE gets fined/imprisoned/
    deported for his own actions. I feel sure the word will get out then
    that Germans are serious about prosecuting offenses so he'd better keep
    his paws off the women.

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 14 16:42:39 2025
    On 2025-07-14 1:51 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 9:59:33 AM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

    Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
    , , ,
    If I was running Germany, I'd make it a condition for admission to the
    country, even as a refugee, that someone sit down with them and explain
    (via an interpreter) that it is extremely offensive to German society to >>> molest women, describing all the different forms of molestation, and
    that there will be major specified consequences if they do. Make sure
    they repeat a detailed acknowledgement to that fact in their own
    language, record it, and archive it, all keyed on their fingerprints or
    other biometric. If they've done that - and satisfied all the other
    rules for entry into Germany - they can come into Germany.

    I would impart this clue by swinging a LART against the side of the head
    as hard as possible. If the clue bounces without penetrating, then the
    refugee or asylum seeker simply is not eligible for admission.

    I'm sorry but someone who grew up in a religion and culture with such
    contempt for women is not going to change his attitude of contempt just
    from having such a discussion. The problem is that where they come from,
    women have no autonomy and cannot go out in public without supervision
    from a father, husband, brother, or other male relative. Furthermore,
    they come from a sexually-repressed society.

    They show up in Germany in which young women are free to walk around
    unsupervised, who show a lot of skin and generally do not repress their
    sexuality. The perpetrator who has likely never had sex sees nothing but
    sinful behavior. These women are not human beings so raping them means
    that the perpetrator has not committed a crime against a person.

    And the German government responds by forgiving the rapist and telling its native born female citizens to start wearing hijabs and stop wearing shorts and crop tops and don't wear bikinis at public pools.

    As it is everywhere in the West, the politicians say it's *our* duty to accommodate our culture to theirs. We're the ones who are supposed to change to make *them* happy, not the other way around.

    All too true. And I'm just as sick of it as you are.

    If, at some future time, they are implicated in some kind of
    molestation, whether it is pulling down a woman's swimsuit in the pool
    or rape or anything else, their recording can be vital evidence in court >>> showing that they DID know that these behaviours were not cool and went
    ahead anyway. Then they can be imprisoned and/or deported and no one can >>> play the "poor little lamb just didn't know it was wrong" card.

    But it's not the perpetrator who is claiming that he cannot be
    prosecuted for the criminal act on the basis of having grown up without
    Western values. Those making the claim are Germans, who grew up WITH
    Western values, who damn well know better.





    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 14 16:49:55 2025
    On 2025-07-14 1:47 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 7:05:06 AM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    On 2025-07-13 4:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 13, 2025 at 1:19:39 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>
    On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of Peace to flood
    into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their barbarity
    with
    them, the German government has been trying to tackle the problem of brown
    men
    sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about everywhere. From
    public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the street in
    broad
    daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the predations of the
    Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon them against
    their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches to outright
    rape.

    The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent on >>>>> committing
    slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it happens and
    the
    courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply 'culturally unaware'
    that
    rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim men have been
    sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually full-on >>>>> raping
    women under this theory that they just don't know any better because they
    come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages.

    Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this problem
    head-on
    with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters displayed in
    public
    places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual assault is a
    nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad behavior in
    action.

    The only problem?

    They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the migrants,
    instead
    of the other way around, the way it really happens literally 100% of the
    time:

    https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
    https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
    https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

    Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male sexual >>>>> violence
    in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal aliens. It's
    really those horrible native German citizens who are assaulting the poor
    vulnerable migrants.

    Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus groping >>>>> Muhammed's
    ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool.
    Apparently, the
    one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being raped by evil
    white women (and portly gay white men, too).
    .
    "...this theory that they just don't know any better because they come >>>> from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages."

    What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?

    Well, if it's true that they honestly don't know that violently raping women
    is wrong, if that's their cultural norm, then my position as a German
    citizen
    would be to STOP LETTING PEOPLE WHO HOLD THOSE VALUES INTO MY COUNTRY BY THE
    MILLIONS.

    How about we try that for a while and see how it works?


    If I was running Germany, I'd make it a condition for admission to the
    country, even as a refugee, that someone sit down with them and explain
    (via an interpreter) that it is extremely offensive to German society to
    molest women, describing all the different forms of molestation, and
    that there will be major specified consequences if they do. Make sure
    they repeat a detailed acknowledgement to that fact in their own
    language, record it, and archive it, all keyed on their fingerprints or
    other biometric. If they've done that - and satisfied all the other
    rules for entry into Germany - they can come into Germany.

    As I said before, none of that is really needed, at least right now. Germany (like France and England and Ireland and Sweden and Norway), already has far too many 3rd-world immigrants as it stands. It's crushing their society, bankrupting their health care and welfare systems and bringing in a culture that's antithetical to (and incompatible with) Western values.

    So just stop importing people. Close the borders to immigrants for the next 10
    years, then reevaluate and maybe open back up with the rules you suggest.

    Germany never saw itself as a country that took in significant number of immigrants. (They *did* take in some ethnic Germans who had been living elsewhere, in some cases for centuries, like the Volga Germans from
    Russia who had been persuaded to come to Russia by Peter The Great in
    the early 1700s.) I've seen videos as recently as 10/15 years ago were
    ordinary Germans said - without apparently fear of contradiction - that
    "we're not an immigration country like Canada or Australia".

    That all changed under Angela Merkel when she decided to accept mass immigration back in the mid 2010s. I would think that reverting back to
    their old policies would not get a whole lot of pushback from German
    voters.

    If, at some future time, they are implicated in some kind of
    molestation, whether it is pulling down a woman's swimsuit in the pool
    or rape or anything else, their recording can be vital evidence in court
    showing that they DID know that these behaviours were not cool and went
    ahead anyway. Then they can be imprisoned and/or deported and no one can
    play the "poor little lamb just didn't know it was wrong" card.





    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to moviePig on Mon Jul 14 17:01:52 2025
    On 2025-07-14 2:11 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 1:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 9:09:00 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:

      The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The offenders in >>>>   these cases are told by their religion that women that don't dress
      modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how strict their >>>>   particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and aren't entitled
    to any
      respect from men. Pulling off their swimsuits - top or bottom - is
      perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing man.
      In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own
    women-
      only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will swim
    (or walk
      around outside the house) without having her hair covered because
      Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven mad with lust
    at the
      sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be held responsible for
    acting
      on that lust.
      A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be
      assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs.
      I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years back >>>>   where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his phone to >>>>   the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him on public >>>>   transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual activity with the >>>>   German word "ficken", which means fuck in English.

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman that
    its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous neglect.
    Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their boobs in a
    supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast principled stones?

    We're qualified because it's *our* country and we're entitled to have
    our own
    culture and norms. Any immigrant who wants to come here must adjust to
    us, not
    us to him.

    ...which, afaics, boils down to "Might makes right".


    "The majority rules" is a lot closer to the justification that "might
    makes right".

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to moviePig on Mon Jul 14 17:00:18 2025
    On 2025-07-14 12:09 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-13 4:19 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of Peace to
    flood
    into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their
    barbarity with
    them, the German government has been trying to tackle the problem of
    brown men
    sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about everywhere.
    From
    public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the street
    in broad
    daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the predations
    of the
    Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon them
    against
    their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches to
    outright
    rape.

    The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent on
    committing
    slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it happens
    and the
    courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply 'culturally
    unaware' that
    rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim men have
    been
    sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually full-
    on raping
    women under this theory that they just don't know any better because
    they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages.

    Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this
    problem head-on
    with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters displayed
    in public
    places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual
    assault is a
    nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad
    behavior in
    action.

    The only problem?

    They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the
    migrants, instead
    of the other way around, the way it really happens literally 100% of
    the
    time:

    https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
    https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
    https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

    Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male
    sexual violence
    in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal aliens.
    It's
    really those horrible native German citizens who are assaulting the
    poor
    vulnerable migrants.

    Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus groping
    Muhammed's
    ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool.
    Apparently, the
    one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being raped
    by evil
    white women (and portly gay white men, too).

    "...this theory that they just don't know any better because they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages."

    What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?


    The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The offenders in
    these cases are told by their religion that women that don't dress
    modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how strict their
    particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and aren't entitled to
    any respect from men. Pulling off their swimsuits - top or bottom - is
    perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing man.

    In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own women-
    only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will swim (or
    walk around outside the house) without having her hair covered because
    Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven mad with lust at
    the sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be held responsible for
    acting on that lust.

    A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be
    assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs.

    I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years back
    where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his phone to
    the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him on public
    transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual activity with the
    German word "ficken", which means fuck in English.

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman that
    its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous neglect. Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their boobs in a supermarket,
    what qualitatively entitles us to cast principled stones?


    In my entire life, I have never seen a woman going topless in the
    supermarket so I really don't know what you're talking about. I haven't
    even heard women cluck to each other in semi-whispers about another
    woman who is showing more than the average amount of boob.

    For what it's worth, a woman in Guelph, Ontario effectively made it
    legal for women to go topless whenever they wanted (in Ontario) about 30
    years ago.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_toplessness_in_Canada

    In any case, what do your remarks even have to do with Muslim men
    harassing women? You acknowledge that these are barbaric behaviours but
    you still seem to be hunting for some excuse for this behaviour. It
    seems like you're trying to root that excuse in some perceived hypocrisy
    among Westerners.

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to Rhino on Mon Jul 14 21:07:39 2025
    Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    ?? What's a LART?

    http://www.faqs.org/faqs/sysadmin-recovery/

    See Section 11.4.

    It's useful in educating computer users but must be swung in such a way
    as to penetrate the skull without damaging the innocent computer.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to Rhino on Mon Jul 14 17:17:30 2025
    On 7/14/2025 5:01 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 2:11 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 1:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 9:09:00 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
    wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:

      The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The
    offenders in
      these cases are told by their religion that women that don't dress >>>>>   modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how strict their >>>>>   particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and aren't entitled >>>>> to any
      respect from men. Pulling off their swimsuits - top or bottom - is >>>>>   perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing man.
      In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own
    women-
      only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will swim
    (or walk
      around outside the house) without having her hair covered because >>>>>   Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven mad with lust
    at the
      sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be held responsible for >>>>> acting
      on that lust.
      A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be >>>>>   assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs.
      I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years
    back
      where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his
    phone to
      the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him on public >>>>>   transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual activity with the >>>>>   German word "ficken", which means fuck in English.

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman that >>>> its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous neglect.
    Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their boobs in a
    supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast principled stones?

    We're qualified because it's *our* country and we're entitled to have
    our own
    culture and norms. Any immigrant who wants to come here must adjust
    to us, not
    us to him.

    ...which, afaics, boils down to "Might makes right".


    "The majority rules" is a lot closer to the justification that "might
    makes right".

    That's fine and ethically consistent *if* we acknowledge that the
    majority's rules are inherently arbitrary and aren't allowed to impinge
    on private behavior.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to Adam H. Kerman on Mon Jul 14 17:32:02 2025
    On 2025-07-14 5:07 PM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    ?? What's a LART?

    http://www.faqs.org/faqs/sysadmin-recovery/

    See Section 11.4.

    It's useful in educating computer users but must be swung in such a way
    as to penetrate the skull without damaging the innocent computer.

    I'm familiar with several aspects of system admiminstration but even I
    have never seen or heard this acronym let alone what it stands for. You
    may want to try using less cryptic terminology to communicate your
    points.... ;-)

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to Rhino on Mon Jul 14 17:44:48 2025
    On 7/14/2025 5:00 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 12:09 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-13 4:19 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of Peace
    to flood
    into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their
    barbarity with
    them, the German government has been trying to tackle the problem
    of brown men
    sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about
    everywhere. From
    public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the street
    in broad
    daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the predations
    of the
    Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon them
    against
    their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches to
    outright
    rape.

    The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent on
    committing
    slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it happens
    and the
    courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply 'culturally
    unaware' that
    rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim men
    have been
    sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually full-
    on raping
    women under this theory that they just don't know any better
    because they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages.

    Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this
    problem head-on
    with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters displayed
    in public
    places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual
    assault is a
    nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad
    behavior in
    action.

    The only problem?

    They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the
    migrants, instead
    of the other way around, the way it really happens literally 100%
    of the
    time:

    https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
    https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
    https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

    Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male
    sexual violence
    in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal
    aliens. It's
    really those horrible native German citizens who are assaulting the
    poor
    vulnerable migrants.

    Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus groping
    Muhammed's
    ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool.
    Apparently, the
    one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being raped
    by evil
    white women (and portly gay white men, too).

    "...this theory that they just don't know any better because they come >>>> from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages."

    What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?


    The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The offenders in
    these cases are told by their religion that women that don't dress
    modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how strict their
    particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and aren't entitled to
    any respect from men. Pulling off their swimsuits - top or bottom -
    is perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing man.

    In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own
    women- only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will
    swim (or walk around outside the house) without having her hair
    covered because Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven
    mad with lust at the sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be
    held responsible for acting on that lust.

    A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be
    assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs.

    I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years back
    where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his phone to
    the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him on public
    transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual activity with the
    German word "ficken", which means fuck in English.

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman that
    its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous neglect.
    Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their boobs in a
    supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast principled stones?


    In my entire life, I have never seen a woman going topless in the
    supermarket so I really don't know what you're talking about. I haven't
    even heard women cluck to each other in semi-whispers about another
    woman who is showing more than the average amount of boob.

    For what it's worth, a woman in Guelph, Ontario effectively made it
    legal for women to go topless whenever they wanted (in Ontario) about 30 years ago.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_toplessness_in_Canada

    In any case, what do your remarks even have to do with Muslim men
    harassing women? You acknowledge that these are barbaric behaviours but
    you still seem to be hunting for some excuse for this behaviour. It
    seems like you're trying to root that excuse in some perceived hypocrisy among Westerners.

    I'm trying to point out that *our* mores aren't without "barbarisms".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 14 17:46:25 2025
    On 7/14/2025 4:38 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 1:11:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 2:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 11:11:57 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 1:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 9:09:00 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:

    The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The offenders in
    these cases are told by their religion that women that don't dress
    modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how strict their
    particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and aren't entitled to any
    respect from men. Pulling off their swimsuits - top or bottom - is
    perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing man.

    In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own women-
    only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will swim (or walk
    around outside the house) without having her hair covered because >>>>>>> Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven mad with lust at the
    sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be held responsible for acting
    on that lust.

    A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be >>>>>>> assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs.

    I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years back
    where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his phone to
    the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him on public
    transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual activity with the
    German word "ficken", which means fuck in English.

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman that
    its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous neglect. >>>>>> Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their boobs in a >>>>>> supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast principled stones?

    We're qualified because it's *our* country and we're entitled to have our
    own
    culture and norms. Any immigrant who wants to come here must adjust to us,
    not
    us to him.

    ...which, afaics, boils down to "Might makes right".

    No, it boils down to "If you don't like our country, culture, and norms, >>> you're free to go elsewhere or stay where you are."

    But yes, we have the right and ability to decide who's allowed into our >>> country and who's not because we have the strength to enforce it. If we >>> didn't, they'd be called "invaders", not "immigrants", and it would be >>> *them*
    who'd have the might.

    We have any right we can enforce?

    When it comes to who's entering our country, you'd best believe it.

    When/where does that rule *not* apply?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to moviePig on Mon Jul 14 18:10:18 2025
    On 2025-07-14 5:44 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 5:00 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 12:09 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-13 4:19 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of Peace
    to flood
    into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their
    barbarity with
    them, the German government has been trying to tackle the problem
    of brown men
    sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about
    everywhere. From
    public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the
    street in broad
    daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the predations >>>>>> of the
    Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon them
    against
    their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches to
    outright
    rape.

    The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent on
    committing
    slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it
    happens and the
    courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply 'culturally
    unaware' that
    rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim men
    have been
    sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually
    full- on raping
    women under this theory that they just don't know any better
    because they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages.

    Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this
    problem head-on
    with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters
    displayed in public
    places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual
    assault is a
    nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad
    behavior in
    action.

    The only problem?

    They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the
    migrants, instead
    of the other way around, the way it really happens literally 100%
    of the
    time:

    https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
    https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
    https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

    Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male
    sexual violence
    in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal
    aliens. It's
    really those horrible native German citizens who are assaulting
    the poor
    vulnerable migrants.

    Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus groping
    Muhammed's
    ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool.
    Apparently, the
    one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being raped >>>>>> by evil
    white women (and portly gay white men, too).

    "...this theory that they just don't know any better because they come >>>>> from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages."

    What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?


    The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The offenders
    in these cases are told by their religion that women that don't
    dress modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how strict
    their particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and aren't
    entitled to any respect from men. Pulling off their swimsuits - top
    or bottom - is perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing man.

    In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own
    women- only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will
    swim (or walk around outside the house) without having her hair
    covered because Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven
    mad with lust at the sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be
    held responsible for acting on that lust.

    A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be
    assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs.

    I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years
    back where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his
    phone to the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him
    on public transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual activity
    with the German word "ficken", which means fuck in English.

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman
    that its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous
    neglect. Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their boobs
    in a supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast principled
    stones?


    In my entire life, I have never seen a woman going topless in the
    supermarket so I really don't know what you're talking about. I
    haven't even heard women cluck to each other in semi-whispers about
    another woman who is showing more than the average amount of boob.

    For what it's worth, a woman in Guelph, Ontario effectively made it
    legal for women to go topless whenever they wanted (in Ontario) about
    30 years ago.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_toplessness_in_Canada

    In any case, what do your remarks even have to do with Muslim men
    harassing women? You acknowledge that these are barbaric behaviours
    but you still seem to be hunting for some excuse for this behaviour.
    It seems like you're trying to root that excuse in some perceived
    hypocrisy among Westerners.

    I'm trying to point out that *our* mores aren't without "barbarisms".


    No culture is perfect. In other breaking news, water is wet and it's
    going to be dark out tonight.

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to Rhino on Mon Jul 14 18:43:16 2025
    On 7/14/2025 6:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 5:44 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 5:00 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 12:09 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-13 4:19 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of Peace >>>>>>> to flood
    into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their
    barbarity with
    them, the German government has been trying to tackle the problem >>>>>>> of brown men
    sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about
    everywhere. From
    public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the
    street in broad
    daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the
    predations of the
    Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon them >>>>>>> against
    their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches to
    outright
    rape.

    The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent on >>>>>>> committing
    slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it
    happens and the
    courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply 'culturally
    unaware' that
    rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim men
    have been
    sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually
    full- on raping
    women under this theory that they just don't know any better
    because they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages.

    Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this
    problem head-on
    with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters
    displayed in public
    places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual
    assault is a
    nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad
    behavior in
    action.

    The only problem?

    They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the
    migrants, instead
    of the other way around, the way it really happens literally 100% >>>>>>> of the
    time:

    https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
    https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
    https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

    Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male
    sexual violence
    in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal
    aliens. It's
    really those horrible native German citizens who are assaulting
    the poor
    vulnerable migrants.

    Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus groping >>>>>>> Muhammed's
    ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool.
    Apparently, the
    one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being
    raped by evil
    white women (and portly gay white men, too).

    "...this theory that they just don't know any better because they
    come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages."

    What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?


    The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The offenders
    in these cases are told by their religion that women that don't
    dress modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how
    strict their particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and
    aren't entitled to any respect from men. Pulling off their
    swimsuits - top or bottom - is perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing
    man.

    In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own
    women- only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will
    swim (or walk around outside the house) without having her hair
    covered because Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven
    mad with lust at the sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be
    held responsible for acting on that lust.

    A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be
    assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs.

    I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years
    back where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his
    phone to the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him
    on public transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual
    activity with the German word "ficken", which means fuck in English.

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman
    that its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous
    neglect. Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their
    boobs in a supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast
    principled stones?


    In my entire life, I have never seen a woman going topless in the
    supermarket so I really don't know what you're talking about. I
    haven't even heard women cluck to each other in semi-whispers about
    another woman who is showing more than the average amount of boob.

    For what it's worth, a woman in Guelph, Ontario effectively made it
    legal for women to go topless whenever they wanted (in Ontario) about
    30 years ago.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_toplessness_in_Canada

    In any case, what do your remarks even have to do with Muslim men
    harassing women? You acknowledge that these are barbaric behaviours
    but you still seem to be hunting for some excuse for this behaviour.
    It seems like you're trying to root that excuse in some perceived
    hypocrisy among Westerners.

    I'm trying to point out that *our* mores aren't without "barbarisms".


    No culture is perfect. In other breaking news, water is wet and it's
    going to be dark out tonight.

    The trick is to bear that in mind when punching down in culture wars.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From danny burstein@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 14 23:24:29 2025
    On 7/14/2025 6:10 PM, Rhino wrote:

    [snip]

    No culture is perfect. In other breaking news, water is wet and it's
    going to be dark out tonight.

    Nope. Water is NOT wet. Water makes other materials wet.



    --
    _____________________________________________________
    Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
    dannyb@panix.com
    [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to moviePig on Mon Jul 14 21:33:55 2025
    On 2025-07-14 6:43 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 6:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 5:44 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 5:00 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 12:09 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-13 4:19 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of
    Peace to flood
    into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their
    barbarity with
    them, the German government has been trying to tackle the
    problem of brown men
    sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about
    everywhere. From
    public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the
    street in broad
    daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the
    predations of the
    Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon
    them against
    their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches to >>>>>>>> outright
    rape.

    The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent on >>>>>>>> committing
    slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it
    happens and the
    courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply 'culturally >>>>>>>> unaware' that
    rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim men >>>>>>>> have been
    sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually
    full- on raping
    women under this theory that they just don't know any better
    because they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages.

    Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this >>>>>>>> problem head-on
    with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters
    displayed in public
    places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual
    assault is a
    nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad >>>>>>>> behavior in
    action.

    The only problem?

    They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the
    migrants, instead
    of the other way around, the way it really happens literally
    100% of the
    time:

    https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
    https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
    https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

    Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male >>>>>>>> sexual violence
    in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal
    aliens. It's
    really those horrible native German citizens who are assaulting >>>>>>>> the poor
    vulnerable migrants.

    Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus groping >>>>>>>> Muhammed's
    ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool.
    Apparently, the
    one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being
    raped by evil
    white women (and portly gay white men, too).

    "...this theory that they just don't know any better because they >>>>>>> come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages."

    What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?


    The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The offenders >>>>>> in these cases are told by their religion that women that don't
    dress modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how
    strict their particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and
    aren't entitled to any respect from men. Pulling off their
    swimsuits - top or bottom - is perfectly okay for any Allah-
    fearing man.

    In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own
    women- only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will
    swim (or walk around outside the house) without having her hair
    covered because Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven >>>>>> mad with lust at the sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be
    held responsible for acting on that lust.

    A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be
    assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs.

    I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years
    back where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his
    phone to the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him >>>>>> on public transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual
    activity with the German word "ficken", which means fuck in English. >>>>>
    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman
    that its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous
    neglect. Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their
    boobs in a supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast
    principled stones?


    In my entire life, I have never seen a woman going topless in the
    supermarket so I really don't know what you're talking about. I
    haven't even heard women cluck to each other in semi-whispers about
    another woman who is showing more than the average amount of boob.

    For what it's worth, a woman in Guelph, Ontario effectively made it
    legal for women to go topless whenever they wanted (in Ontario)
    about 30 years ago.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_toplessness_in_Canada

    In any case, what do your remarks even have to do with Muslim men
    harassing women? You acknowledge that these are barbaric behaviours
    but you still seem to be hunting for some excuse for this behaviour.
    It seems like you're trying to root that excuse in some perceived
    hypocrisy among Westerners.

    I'm trying to point out that *our* mores aren't without "barbarisms".


    No culture is perfect. In other breaking news, water is wet and it's
    going to be dark out tonight.

    The trick is to bear that in mind when punching down in culture wars.


    So because our culture is imperfect, we're not allowed to set any
    standards for anyone from a different culture until our own is perfect
    first?

    In other words the molestation and rape can carry on unabated and
    unpunished because we're not perfect yet?

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 15 02:50:02 2025
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 2:01:52 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    On 2025-07-14 2:11 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 1:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 9:09:00 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>
    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:

      The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The offenders in >>>>>   these cases are told by their religion that women that don't dress >>>>>   modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how strict their >>>>>   particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and aren't entitled >>>>> to any
      respect from men. Pulling off their swimsuits - top or bottom - is >>>>>   perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing man.
      In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own
    women-
      only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will swim
    (or walk
      around outside the house) without having her hair covered because >>>>>   Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven mad with lust >>>>> at the
      sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be held responsible for >>>>> acting
      on that lust.
      A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be >>>>>   assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs.
      I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years back >>>>>   where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his phone to >>>>>   the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him on public >>>>>   transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual activity with the >>>>>   German word "ficken", which means fuck in English.

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman that >>>> its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous neglect.
    Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their boobs in a
    supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast principled stones? >>>
    We're qualified because it's *our* country and we're entitled to have
    our own
    culture and norms. Any immigrant who wants to come here must adjust to
    us, not
    us to him.

    ...which, afaics, boils down to "Might makes right".

    "The majority rules" is a lot closer to the justification that "might
    makes right".

    Yeah, isn't it weird how that 'democracy' they're always so worked up about 'saving' goes right out the window when it doesn't help the Agenda?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Tue Jul 15 02:49:01 2025
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 2:46:25 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 4:38 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 1:11:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>
    On 7/14/2025 2:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 11:11:57 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 1:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 9:09:00 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>>> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:

    The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The offenders in
    these cases are told by their religion that women that don't dress
    modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how strict their
    particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and aren't >>>>>>>> entitled to any
    respect from men. Pulling off their swimsuits - top or bottom - is
    perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing man.

    In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own women-
    only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will swim >>>>>>>> (or walk
    around outside the house) without having her hair covered because
    Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven mad with >>>>>>>> lust at the
    sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be held responsible >>>>>>>> for acting
    on that lust.

    A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be
    assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs. >>>>>>>>
    I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years back
    where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his phone to
    the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him on public
    transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual activity with the
    German word "ficken", which means fuck in English.

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman that
    its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous neglect. >>>>>>> Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their boobs in a >>>>>>> supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast principled stones?

    We're qualified because it's *our* country and we're entitled to >>>>>> have our
    own
    culture and norms. Any immigrant who wants to come here must adjust >>>>>> to us,
    not
    us to him.

    ...which, afaics, boils down to "Might makes right".

    No, it boils down to "If you don't like our country, culture, and norms,
    you're free to go elsewhere or stay where you are."

    But yes, we have the right and ability to decide who's allowed into our >>>> country and who's not because we have the strength to enforce it. If we >>>> didn't, they'd be called "invaders", not "immigrants", and it would be >>>> *them*
    who'd have the might.

    We have any right we can enforce?

    When it comes to who's entering our country, you'd best believe it.

    When/where does that rule *not* apply?

    It applies to everywhere and all the time. Why would you think it would apply only at certain border crossings or at certain times?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Tue Jul 15 03:03:03 2025
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 3:43:16 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 6:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 5:44 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 5:00 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 12:09 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman
    that its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous
    neglect. Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their
    boobs in a supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast
    principled stones?

    In my entire life, I have never seen a woman going topless in the
    supermarket so I really don't know what you're talking about. I
    haven't even heard women cluck to each other in semi-whispers about
    another woman who is showing more than the average amount of boob.

    For what it's worth, a woman in Guelph, Ontario effectively made it
    legal for women to go topless whenever they wanted (in Ontario) about >>>> 30 years ago.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_toplessness_in_Canada

    In any case, what do your remarks even have to do with Muslim men
    harassing women? You acknowledge that these are barbaric behaviours
    but you still seem to be hunting for some excuse for this behaviour.
    It seems like you're trying to root that excuse in some perceived
    hypocrisy among Westerners.

    I'm trying to point out that *our* mores aren't without "barbarisms".

    No culture is perfect. In other breaking news, water is wet and it's
    going to be dark out tonight.

    The trick is to bear that in mind when punching down in culture wars.

    This is typically where the Islam apologist will shout, "Christians are just
    as bad. What about the Inquisition?!?"

    The proper response to which is, if you find yourself always having to reach back centuries, if not millennia, to find analogous Christian examples to counter modern Muslim barbarity, you should do some serious self-examination.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Tue Jul 15 02:52:58 2025
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 2:44:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 5:00 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 12:09 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-13 4:19 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of Peace >>>>>> to flood
    into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their
    barbarity with
    them, the German government has been trying to tackle the problem >>>>>> of brown men
    sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about
    everywhere. From
    public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the street >>>>>> in broad
    daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the predations >>>>>> of the
    Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon them >>>>>> against
    their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches to
    outright
    rape.

    The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent on
    committing
    slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it happens >>>>>> and the
    courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply 'culturally
    unaware' that
    rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim men
    have been
    sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually full- >>>>>> on raping
    women under this theory that they just don't know any better
    because they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages.

    Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this
    problem head-on
    with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters displayed >>>>>> in public
    places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual
    assault is a
    nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad
    behavior in
    action.

    The only problem?

    They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the
    migrants, instead
    of the other way around, the way it really happens literally 100% >>>>>> of the
    time:

    https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
    https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
    https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

    Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male
    sexual violence
    in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal
    aliens. It's
    really those horrible native German citizens who are assaulting the >>>>>> poor
    vulnerable migrants.

    Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus groping
    Muhammed's
    ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool.
    Apparently, the
    one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being raped >>>>>> by evil
    white women (and portly gay white men, too).

    "...this theory that they just don't know any better because they come >>>>> from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages."

    What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?


    The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The offenders in >>>> these cases are told by their religion that women that don't dress
    modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how strict their
    particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and aren't entitled to
    any respect from men. Pulling off their swimsuits - top or bottom -
    is perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing man.

    In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own
    women- only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will
    swim (or walk around outside the house) without having her hair
    covered because Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven
    mad with lust at the sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be
    held responsible for acting on that lust.

    A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be
    assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs.

    I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years back >>>> where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his phone to >>>> the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him on public
    transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual activity with the
    German word "ficken", which means fuck in English.

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman that
    its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous neglect.
    Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their boobs in a
    supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast principled stones?


    In my entire life, I have never seen a woman going topless in the
    supermarket so I really don't know what you're talking about. I haven't
    even heard women cluck to each other in semi-whispers about another
    woman who is showing more than the average amount of boob.

    For what it's worth, a woman in Guelph, Ontario effectively made it
    legal for women to go topless whenever they wanted (in Ontario) about 30
    years ago.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_toplessness_in_Canada

    In any case, what do your remarks even have to do with Muslim men
    harassing women? You acknowledge that these are barbaric behaviours but
    you still seem to be hunting for some excuse for this behaviour. It
    seems like you're trying to root that excuse in some perceived hypocrisy
    among Westerners.

    I'm trying to point out that *our* mores aren't without "barbarisms".

    A woman walking around topless is not a barbarism-- well, maybe it is in the case of rhinoceroses on THE VIEW-- in a discussion about cultures that rewards blowing children to smithereens and throws gay people off high buildings and stones women to death for having had the bad luck to be gang-raped.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to atropos@mac.com on Tue Jul 15 04:27:18 2025
    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 3:43:16 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 6:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 5:44 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 5:00 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 12:09 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman >>>>>> that its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous
    neglect. Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their
    boobs in a supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast
    principled stones?

    In my entire life, I have never seen a woman going topless in the
    supermarket so I really don't know what you're talking about. I
    haven't even heard women cluck to each other in semi-whispers about >>>>> another woman who is showing more than the average amount of boob.

    For what it's worth, a woman in Guelph, Ontario effectively made it >>>>> legal for women to go topless whenever they wanted (in Ontario) about >>>>> 30 years ago.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_toplessness_in_Canada

    In any case, what do your remarks even have to do with Muslim men
    harassing women? You acknowledge that these are barbaric behaviours >>>>> but you still seem to be hunting for some excuse for this behaviour. >>>>> It seems like you're trying to root that excuse in some perceived
    hypocrisy among Westerners.

    I'm trying to point out that *our* mores aren't without "barbarisms". >>>>
    No culture is perfect. In other breaking news, water is wet and it's
    going to be dark out tonight.

    The trick is to bear that in mind when punching down in culture wars.

    This is typically where the Islam apologist will shout, "Christians are just >as bad. What about the Inquisition?!?"

    Nobody expects the . . .

    The proper response to which is, if you find yourself always having to reach >back centuries, if not millennia, to find analogous Christian examples to >counter modern Muslim barbarity, you should do some serious self-examination.



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 15 11:20:25 2025
    On 7/14/2025 10:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 2:46:25 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 4:38 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 1:11:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>
    On 7/14/2025 2:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 11:11:57 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 1:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 9:09:00 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
    wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:

    The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The offenders in
    these cases are told by their religion that women that don't dress
    modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how strict their
    particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and aren't >>>>>>>>> entitled to any
    respect from men. Pulling off their swimsuits - top or bottom - is
    perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing man.

    In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own women-
    only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will swim
    (or walk
    around outside the house) without having her hair covered because
    Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven mad with >>>>>>>>> lust at the
    sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be held responsible >>>>>>>>> for acting
    on that lust.

    A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be
    assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs. >>>>>>>>>
    I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years back
    where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his phone to
    the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him on public
    transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual activity with the
    German word "ficken", which means fuck in English.

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman that
    its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous neglect.
    Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their boobs in a
    supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast principled stones?

    We're qualified because it's *our* country and we're entitled to >>>>>>> have our
    own
    culture and norms. Any immigrant who wants to come here must adjust
    to us,
    not
    us to him.

    ...which, afaics, boils down to "Might makes right".

    No, it boils down to "If you don't like our country, culture, and norms,
    you're free to go elsewhere or stay where you are."

    But yes, we have the right and ability to decide who's allowed into our
    country and who's not because we have the strength to enforce it. If we
    didn't, they'd be called "invaders", not "immigrants", and it would be
    *them*
    who'd have the might.

    We have any right we can enforce?

    When it comes to who's entering our country, you'd best believe it.

    When/where does that rule *not* apply?

    It applies to everywhere and all the time. Why would you think it would apply only at certain border crossings or at certain times?

    The 'rule' I'm questioning is an ethical one: "If you can enforce it,
    you have a right to it." You say that rule certainly applies to "who's entering our country", so I'm wondering where it *doesn't* apply.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 15 11:27:11 2025
    On 7/14/2025 10:50 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 2:01:52 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    On 2025-07-14 2:11 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 1:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 9:09:00 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:

      The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The offenders in
      these cases are told by their religion that women that don't dress >>>>>>   modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how strict their
      particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and aren't entitled >>>>>> to any
      respect from men. Pulling off their swimsuits - top or bottom - is >>>>>>   perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing man.
      In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own >>>>>> women-
      only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will swim >>>>>> (or walk
      around outside the house) without having her hair covered because >>>>>>   Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven mad with lust >>>>>> at the
      sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be held responsible for >>>>>> acting
      on that lust.
      A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be >>>>>>   assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs.
      I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years back
      where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his phone to
      the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him on public >>>>>>   transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual activity with the >>>>>>   German word "ficken", which means fuck in English.

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman that >>>>> its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous neglect. >>>>> Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their boobs in a
    supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast principled stones? >>>>
    We're qualified because it's *our* country and we're entitled to have >>>> our own
    culture and norms. Any immigrant who wants to come here must adjust to >>>> us, not
    us to him.

    ...which, afaics, boils down to "Might makes right".

    "The majority rules" is a lot closer to the justification that "might
    makes right".

    Yeah, isn't it weird how that 'democracy' they're always so worked up about 'saving' goes right out the window when it doesn't help the Agenda?

    Especially weird, since I've personally never seen "the Agenda".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to Rhino on Tue Jul 15 11:36:18 2025
    On 7/14/2025 9:33 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 6:43 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 6:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 5:44 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 5:00 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 12:09 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-13 4:19 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of
    Peace to flood
    into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their >>>>>>>>> barbarity with
    them, the German government has been trying to tackle the
    problem of brown men
    sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about
    everywhere. From
    public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the >>>>>>>>> street in broad
    daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the
    predations of the
    Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon >>>>>>>>> them against
    their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches to >>>>>>>>> outright
    rape.

    The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent >>>>>>>>> on committing
    slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it
    happens and the
    courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply 'culturally >>>>>>>>> unaware' that
    rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim men >>>>>>>>> have been
    sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually >>>>>>>>> full- on raping
    women under this theory that they just don't know any better >>>>>>>>> because they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages.

    Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this >>>>>>>>> problem head-on
    with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters
    displayed in public
    places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual >>>>>>>>> assault is a
    nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad >>>>>>>>> behavior in
    action.

    The only problem?

    They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the >>>>>>>>> migrants, instead
    of the other way around, the way it really happens literally >>>>>>>>> 100% of the
    time:

    https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
    https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
    https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

    Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male >>>>>>>>> sexual violence
    in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal >>>>>>>>> aliens. It's
    really those horrible native German citizens who are assaulting >>>>>>>>> the poor
    vulnerable migrants.

    Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus
    groping Muhammed's
    ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool. >>>>>>>>> Apparently, the
    one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being >>>>>>>>> raped by evil
    white women (and portly gay white men, too).

    "...this theory that they just don't know any better because
    they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages."

    What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?


    The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The
    offenders in these cases are told by their religion that women
    that don't dress modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending >>>>>>> on how strict their particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes >>>>>>> and aren't entitled to any respect from men. Pulling off their
    swimsuits - top or bottom - is perfectly okay for any Allah-
    fearing man.

    In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own
    women- only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will >>>>>>> swim (or walk around outside the house) without having her hair
    covered because Muslims apparently believe that men will be
    driven mad with lust at the sight of a woman's hair and the men
    can't be held responsible for acting on that lust.

    A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be >>>>>>> assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs.

    I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years >>>>>>> back where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his >>>>>>> phone to the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside
    him on public transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual
    activity with the German word "ficken", which means fuck in English. >>>>>>
    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman
    that its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous
    neglect. Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their
    boobs in a supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast
    principled stones?


    In my entire life, I have never seen a woman going topless in the
    supermarket so I really don't know what you're talking about. I
    haven't even heard women cluck to each other in semi-whispers about
    another woman who is showing more than the average amount of boob.

    For what it's worth, a woman in Guelph, Ontario effectively made it
    legal for women to go topless whenever they wanted (in Ontario)
    about 30 years ago.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_toplessness_in_Canada

    In any case, what do your remarks even have to do with Muslim men
    harassing women? You acknowledge that these are barbaric behaviours
    but you still seem to be hunting for some excuse for this
    behaviour. It seems like you're trying to root that excuse in some
    perceived hypocrisy among Westerners.

    I'm trying to point out that *our* mores aren't without "barbarisms".


    No culture is perfect. In other breaking news, water is wet and it's
    going to be dark out tonight.

    The trick is to bear that in mind when punching down in culture wars.


    So because our culture is imperfect, we're not allowed to set any
    standards for anyone from a different culture until our own is perfect
    first?

    In other words the molestation and rape can carry on unabated and
    unpunished because we're not perfect yet?

    Whose "other words" are those? What I continually suggest is that we
    carefully examine any stance based on our "moral superiority".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 15 11:44:17 2025
    On 7/14/2025 11:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 3:43:16 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 6:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 5:44 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 5:00 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 12:09 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman >>>>>> that its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous
    neglect. Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their
    boobs in a supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast
    principled stones?

    In my entire life, I have never seen a woman going topless in the
    supermarket so I really don't know what you're talking about. I
    haven't even heard women cluck to each other in semi-whispers about >>>>> another woman who is showing more than the average amount of boob. >>>>>
    For what it's worth, a woman in Guelph, Ontario effectively made it >>>>> legal for women to go topless whenever they wanted (in Ontario) about >>>>> 30 years ago.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_toplessness_in_Canada

    In any case, what do your remarks even have to do with Muslim men
    harassing women? You acknowledge that these are barbaric behaviours >>>>> but you still seem to be hunting for some excuse for this behaviour. >>>>> It seems like you're trying to root that excuse in some perceived
    hypocrisy among Westerners.

    I'm trying to point out that *our* mores aren't without "barbarisms". >>>>
    No culture is perfect. In other breaking news, water is wet and it's
    going to be dark out tonight.

    The trick is to bear that in mind when punching down in culture wars.

    This is typically where the Islam apologist will shout, "Christians are just as bad. What about the Inquisition?!?"

    The proper response to which is, if you find yourself always having to reach back centuries, if not millennia, to find analogous Christian examples to counter modern Muslim barbarity, you should do some serious self-examination.

    Debates that reach into religion can't be won.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 15 11:50:06 2025
    On 7/14/2025 10:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 2:44:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 5:00 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 12:09 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-13 4:19 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of Peace >>>>>>> to flood
    into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their
    barbarity with
    them, the German government has been trying to tackle the problem >>>>>>> of brown men
    sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about
    everywhere. From
    public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the street >>>>>>> in broad
    daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the predations >>>>>>> of the
    Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon them >>>>>>> against
    their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches to >>>>>>> outright
    rape.

    The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent on >>>>>>> committing
    slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it happens >>>>>>> and the
    courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply 'culturally >>>>>>> unaware' that
    rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim men >>>>>>> have been
    sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually full- >>>>>>> on raping
    women under this theory that they just don't know any better
    because they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages.

    Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this >>>>>>> problem head-on
    with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters displayed >>>>>>> in public
    places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual
    assault is a
    nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad >>>>>>> behavior in
    action.

    The only problem?

    They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the
    migrants, instead
    of the other way around, the way it really happens literally 100% >>>>>>> of the
    time:

    https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
    https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
    https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

    Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male >>>>>>> sexual violence
    in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal
    aliens. It's
    really those horrible native German citizens who are assaulting the >>>>>>> poor
    vulnerable migrants.

    Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus groping >>>>>>> Muhammed's
    ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool.
    Apparently, the
    one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being raped >>>>>>> by evil
    white women (and portly gay white men, too).

    "...this theory that they just don't know any better because they come >>>>>> from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages."

    What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?


    The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The offenders in >>>>> these cases are told by their religion that women that don't dress >>>>> modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how strict their >>>>> particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and aren't entitled to >>>>> any respect from men. Pulling off their swimsuits - top or bottom - >>>>> is perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing man.

    In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own
    women- only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will
    swim (or walk around outside the house) without having her hair
    covered because Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven >>>>> mad with lust at the sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be
    held responsible for acting on that lust.

    A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be
    assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs.

    I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years back >>>>> where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his phone to >>>>> the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him on public >>>>> transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual activity with the >>>>> German word "ficken", which means fuck in English.

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman that >>>> its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous neglect.
    Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their boobs in a
    supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast principled stones? >>>>

    In my entire life, I have never seen a woman going topless in the
    supermarket so I really don't know what you're talking about. I haven't >>> even heard women cluck to each other in semi-whispers about another
    woman who is showing more than the average amount of boob.

    For what it's worth, a woman in Guelph, Ontario effectively made it
    legal for women to go topless whenever they wanted (in Ontario) about 30 >>> years ago.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_toplessness_in_Canada

    In any case, what do your remarks even have to do with Muslim men
    harassing women? You acknowledge that these are barbaric behaviours but >>> you still seem to be hunting for some excuse for this behaviour. It
    seems like you're trying to root that excuse in some perceived hypocrisy >>> among Westerners.

    I'm trying to point out that *our* mores aren't without "barbarisms".

    A woman walking around topless is not a barbarism-- well, maybe it is in the case of rhinoceroses on THE VIEW-- in a discussion about cultures that rewards
    blowing children to smithereens and throws gay people off high buildings and stones women to death for having had the bad luck to be gang-raped.

    Where logic is concerned, a rule against going topless is indeed a
    barbarism (...unless you open the social-discomfort can of worms).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Tue Jul 15 19:17:58 2025
    On Jul 15, 2025 at 8:27:11 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 10:50 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 2:01:52 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> >> wrote:

    On 2025-07-14 2:11 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 1:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 9:09:00 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:

      The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The offenders in
      these cases are told by their religion that women that don't dress
      modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how strict their
      particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and aren't entitled >>>>>>> to any
      respect from men. Pulling off their swimsuits - top or bottom - is
      perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing man.
      In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own >>>>>>> women-
      only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will swim >>>>>>> (or walk
      around outside the house) without having her hair covered because >>>>>>>   Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven mad with lust >>>>>>> at the
      sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be held responsible for >>>>>>> acting
      on that lust.
      A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be >>>>>>>   assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs.
      I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years back
      where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his phone to
      the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him on public
      transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual activity with the
      German word "ficken", which means fuck in English.

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman that
    its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous neglect. >>>>>> Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their boobs in a >>>>>> supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast principled stones?

    We're qualified because it's *our* country and we're entitled to have >>>>> our own
    culture and norms. Any immigrant who wants to come here must adjust to >>>>> us, not
    us to him.

    ...which, afaics, boils down to "Might makes right".

    "The majority rules" is a lot closer to the justification that "might
    makes right".

    Yeah, isn't it weird how that 'democracy' they're always so worked up about >> 'saving' goes right out the window when it doesn't help the Agenda?

    Especially weird, since I've personally never seen "the Agenda".

    And yet you still manage to hew to it with great enthusiasm.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Tue Jul 15 19:16:58 2025
    On Jul 15, 2025 at 8:20:25 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 10:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 2:46:25 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>
    On 7/14/2025 4:38 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 1:11:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 2:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 11:11:57 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>>> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 1:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 9:09:00 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
    wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:

    The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The >>>>>>>>>> offenders in
    these cases are told by their religion that women that don't dress
    modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how strict their
    particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and aren't >>>>>>>>>> entitled to any
    respect from men. Pulling off their swimsuits - top or bottom - is
    perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing man.

    In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their >>>>>>>>>> own women-
    only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will swim
    (or walk
    around outside the house) without having her hair covered because
    Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven mad with >>>>>>>>>> lust at the
    sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be held responsible
    for acting
    on that lust.

    A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be
    assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs. >>>>>>>>>>
    I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of >>>>>>>>>> years back
    where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on >>>>>>>>>> his phone to
    the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him on public
    transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual activity with the
    German word "ficken", which means fuck in English. >>>>>>>>>
    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman that
    its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous neglect.
    Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their boobs in a
    supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast principled stones?

    We're qualified because it's *our* country and we're entitled to
    have our
    own
    culture and norms. Any immigrant who wants to come here must adjust
    to us,
    not
    us to him.

    ...which, afaics, boils down to "Might makes right".

    No, it boils down to "If you don't like our country, culture, and norms,
    you're free to go elsewhere or stay where you are."

    But yes, we have the right and ability to decide who's allowed into our
    country and who's not because we have the strength to enforce it. If we
    didn't, they'd be called "invaders", not "immigrants", and it would be
    *them*
    who'd have the might.

    We have any right we can enforce?

    When it comes to who's entering our country, you'd best believe it.

    When/where does that rule *not* apply?

    It applies to everywhere and all the time. Why would you think it would
    apply
    only at certain border crossings or at certain times?

    The 'rule' I'm questioning is an ethical one: "If you can enforce it,
    you have a right to it." You say that rule certainly applies to "who's entering our country", so I'm wondering where it *doesn't* apply.

    That's up to the electorate and/or the Constitution to decide.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Tue Jul 15 19:20:13 2025
    On Jul 15, 2025 at 8:44:17 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 11:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 3:43:16 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>
    On 7/14/2025 6:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 5:44 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 5:00 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 12:09 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman >>>>>>> that its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous >>>>>>> neglect. Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their >>>>>>> boobs in a supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast >>>>>>> principled stones?

    In my entire life, I have never seen a woman going topless in the >>>>>> supermarket so I really don't know what you're talking about. I >>>>>> haven't even heard women cluck to each other in semi-whispers about >>>>>> another woman who is showing more than the average amount of boob. >>>>>>
    For what it's worth, a woman in Guelph, Ontario effectively made it >>>>>> legal for women to go topless whenever they wanted (in Ontario) about >>>>>> 30 years ago.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_toplessness_in_Canada

    In any case, what do your remarks even have to do with Muslim men >>>>>> harassing women? You acknowledge that these are barbaric behaviours >>>>>> but you still seem to be hunting for some excuse for this behaviour. >>>>>> It seems like you're trying to root that excuse in some perceived >>>>>> hypocrisy among Westerners.

    I'm trying to point out that *our* mores aren't without "barbarisms". >>>>>
    No culture is perfect. In other breaking news, water is wet and it's >>>> going to be dark out tonight.

    The trick is to bear that in mind when punching down in culture wars.

    This is typically where the Islam apologist will shout, "Christians are just
    as bad. What about the Inquisition?!?"

    The proper response to which is, if you find yourself always having to reach
    back centuries, if not millennia, to find analogous Christian examples to >> counter modern Muslim barbarity, you should do some serious
    self-examination.

    Debates that reach into religion can't be won.

    But they certainly don't have to include importing the practitioners of those religions into your neighborhoods if they're going to be given official exemption from your laws and cultural norms due to their 'cultural
    ignorance'.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 15 16:57:05 2025
    On 7/15/2025 3:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 15, 2025 at 8:44:17 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 11:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 3:43:16 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>
    On 7/14/2025 6:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 5:44 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 5:00 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 12:09 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman >>>>>>>> that its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous >>>>>>>> neglect. Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their >>>>>>>> boobs in a supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast >>>>>>>> principled stones?

    In my entire life, I have never seen a woman going topless in the >>>>>>> supermarket so I really don't know what you're talking about. I >>>>>>> haven't even heard women cluck to each other in semi-whispers about >>>>>>> another woman who is showing more than the average amount of boob. >>>>>>>
    For what it's worth, a woman in Guelph, Ontario effectively made it >>>>>>> legal for women to go topless whenever they wanted (in Ontario) about
    30 years ago.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_toplessness_in_Canada

    In any case, what do your remarks even have to do with Muslim men >>>>>>> harassing women? You acknowledge that these are barbaric behaviours >>>>>>> but you still seem to be hunting for some excuse for this behaviour.
    It seems like you're trying to root that excuse in some perceived >>>>>>> hypocrisy among Westerners.

    I'm trying to point out that *our* mores aren't without "barbarisms".

    No culture is perfect. In other breaking news, water is wet and it's >>>>> going to be dark out tonight.

    The trick is to bear that in mind when punching down in culture wars. >>>
    This is typically where the Islam apologist will shout, "Christians are just
    as bad. What about the Inquisition?!?"

    The proper response to which is, if you find yourself always having to reach
    back centuries, if not millennia, to find analogous Christian examples to >>> counter modern Muslim barbarity, you should do some serious
    self-examination.

    Debates that reach into religion can't be won.

    But they certainly don't have to include importing the practitioners of those religions into your neighborhoods if they're going to be given official exemption from your laws and cultural norms due to their 'cultural ignorance'.

    Our government, by long tradition, doesn't recognize specific religions.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 15 16:54:08 2025
    On 7/15/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 15, 2025 at 8:27:11 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 10:50 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 2:01:52 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com>
    wrote:

    On 2025-07-14 2:11 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 1:55 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 9:09:00 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:

      The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The offenders in
      these cases are told by their religion that women that don't dress
      modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how strict their
      particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and aren't entitled
    to any
      respect from men. Pulling off their swimsuits - top or bottom - is
      perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing man.
      In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own >>>>>>>> women-
      only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will swim >>>>>>>> (or walk
      around outside the house) without having her hair covered because
      Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven mad with lust
    at the
      sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be held responsible for
    acting
      on that lust.
      A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be
      assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs. >>>>>>>>   I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years back
      where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his phone to
      the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him on public
      transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual activity with the
      German word "ficken", which means fuck in English.

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman that
    its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous neglect. >>>>>>> Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their boobs in a >>>>>>> supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast principled stones?

    We're qualified because it's *our* country and we're entitled to have
    our own
    culture and norms. Any immigrant who wants to come here must adjust to
    us, not
    us to him.

    ...which, afaics, boils down to "Might makes right".

    "The majority rules" is a lot closer to the justification that "might >>>> makes right".

    Yeah, isn't it weird how that 'democracy' they're always so worked up about
    'saving' goes right out the window when it doesn't help the Agenda?

    Especially weird, since I've personally never seen "the Agenda".

    And yet you still manage to hew to it with great enthusiasm.

    Why not? Surely an imaginary agenda deserves an imaginary attitude...

    aginary agenda deserves an imaginary attitude...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Tue Jul 15 21:15:30 2025
    On Jul 15, 2025 at 1:57:05 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/15/2025 3:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 15, 2025 at 8:44:17 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>
    On 7/14/2025 11:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 3:43:16 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 6:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 5:44 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 5:00 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 12:09 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman
    that its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous >>>>>>>>> neglect. Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their >>>>>>>>> boobs in a supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast >>>>>>>>> principled stones?

    In my entire life, I have never seen a woman going topless in the >>>>>>>> supermarket so I really don't know what you're talking about. I >>>>>>>> haven't even heard women cluck to each other in semi-whispers about
    another woman who is showing more than the average amount of boob.

    For what it's worth, a woman in Guelph, Ontario effectively made it
    legal for women to go topless whenever they wanted (in Ontario) about
    30 years ago.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_toplessness_in_Canada >>>>>>>>
    In any case, what do your remarks even have to do with Muslim men >>>>>>>> harassing women? You acknowledge that these are barbaric behaviours
    but you still seem to be hunting for some excuse for this behaviour.
    It seems like you're trying to root that excuse in some perceived >>>>>>>> hypocrisy among Westerners.

    I'm trying to point out that *our* mores aren't without "barbarisms".

    No culture is perfect. In other breaking news, water is wet and it's
    going to be dark out tonight.

    The trick is to bear that in mind when punching down in culture wars. >>>>
    This is typically where the Islam apologist will shout, "Christians are >>>> just
    as bad. What about the Inquisition?!?"

    The proper response to which is, if you find yourself always having to >>>> reach
    back centuries, if not millennia, to find analogous Christian examples to
    counter modern Muslim barbarity, you should do some serious
    self-examination.

    Debates that reach into religion can't be won.

    But they certainly don't have to include importing the practitioners of
    those
    religions into your neighborhoods if they're going to be given official
    exemption from your laws and cultural norms due to their 'cultural
    ignorance'.

    Our government, by long tradition, doesn't recognize specific religions.

    But it can recognize actions.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 15 17:48:13 2025
    On 7/15/2025 5:15 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 15, 2025 at 1:57:05 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/15/2025 3:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 15, 2025 at 8:44:17 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>
    On 7/14/2025 11:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 3:43:16 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 6:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 5:44 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 5:00 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 12:09 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman
    that its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous >>>>>>>>>> neglect. Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their
    boobs in a supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast >>>>>>>>>> principled stones?

    In my entire life, I have never seen a woman going topless in the
    supermarket so I really don't know what you're talking about. I >>>>>>>>> haven't even heard women cluck to each other in semi-whispers about
    another woman who is showing more than the average amount of boob.

    For what it's worth, a woman in Guelph, Ontario effectively made it
    legal for women to go topless whenever they wanted (in Ontario) about
    30 years ago.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_toplessness_in_Canada >>>>>>>>>
    In any case, what do your remarks even have to do with Muslim men
    harassing women? You acknowledge that these are barbaric behaviours
    but you still seem to be hunting for some excuse for this behaviour.
    It seems like you're trying to root that excuse in some perceived
    hypocrisy among Westerners.

    I'm trying to point out that *our* mores aren't without "barbarisms".

    No culture is perfect. In other breaking news, water is wet and it's
    going to be dark out tonight.

    The trick is to bear that in mind when punching down in culture wars.

    This is typically where the Islam apologist will shout, "Christians are
    just
    as bad. What about the Inquisition?!?"

    The proper response to which is, if you find yourself always having to
    reach
    back centuries, if not millennia, to find analogous Christian examples to
    counter modern Muslim barbarity, you should do some serious
    self-examination.

    Debates that reach into religion can't be won.

    But they certainly don't have to include importing the practitioners of >>> those
    religions into your neighborhoods if they're going to be given official >>> exemption from your laws and cultural norms due to their 'cultural
    ignorance'.

    Our government, by long tradition, doesn't recognize specific religions.

    But it can recognize actions.

    Actions, hairstyle, BMI, etc. ...just not religion.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Tue Jul 15 22:14:42 2025
    On Jul 15, 2025 at 2:48:13 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/15/2025 5:15 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 15, 2025 at 1:57:05 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>
    On 7/15/2025 3:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 15, 2025 at 8:44:17 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 11:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 3:43:16 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>>> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 6:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 5:44 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 5:00 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 12:09 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman
    that its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous
    neglect. Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their
    boobs in a supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast
    principled stones?

    In my entire life, I have never seen a woman going topless in the
    supermarket so I really don't know what you're talking about. I
    haven't even heard women cluck to each other in semi-whispers about
    another woman who is showing more than the average amount of boob.

    For what it's worth, a woman in Guelph, Ontario effectively made it
    legal for women to go topless whenever they wanted (in Ontario) about
    30 years ago.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_toplessness_in_Canada >>>>>>>>>>
    In any case, what do your remarks even have to do with Muslim men
    harassing women? You acknowledge that these are barbaric behaviours
    but you still seem to be hunting for some excuse for this behaviour.
    It seems like you're trying to root that excuse in some perceived
    hypocrisy among Westerners.

    I'm trying to point out that *our* mores aren't without "barbarisms".

    No culture is perfect. In other breaking news, water is wet and it's
    going to be dark out tonight.

    The trick is to bear that in mind when punching down in culture wars.

    This is typically where the Islam apologist will shout, "Christians are
    just
    as bad. What about the Inquisition?!?"

    The proper response to which is, if you find yourself always having to
    reach
    back centuries, if not millennia, to find analogous Christian >>>>>> examples to
    counter modern Muslim barbarity, you should do some serious
    self-examination.

    Debates that reach into religion can't be won.

    But they certainly don't have to include importing the practitioners of >>>> those
    religions into your neighborhoods if they're going to be given official >>>> exemption from your laws and cultural norms due to their 'cultural
    ignorance'.

    Our government, by long tradition, doesn't recognize specific religions. >>
    But it can recognize actions.

    Actions, hairstyle, BMI, etc. ...just not religion.

    Great. So we just take note of which countries contribute these 'culturally unaware' people who commit these vile actions to the pool of immigrants and
    cut off those countries.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to moviePig on Tue Jul 15 18:36:57 2025
    On 2025-07-15 11:36 AM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 9:33 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 6:43 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 6:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 5:44 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 5:00 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 12:09 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-13 4:19 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of >>>>>>>>>> Peace to flood
    into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their >>>>>>>>>> barbarity with
    them, the German government has been trying to tackle the
    problem of brown men
    sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about
    everywhere. From
    public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the >>>>>>>>>> street in broad
    daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the
    predations of the
    Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon >>>>>>>>>> them against
    their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches >>>>>>>>>> to outright
    rape.

    The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent >>>>>>>>>> on committing
    slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it >>>>>>>>>> happens and the
    courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply
    'culturally unaware' that
    rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim >>>>>>>>>> men have been
    sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually >>>>>>>>>> full- on raping
    women under this theory that they just don't know any better >>>>>>>>>> because they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages. >>>>>>>>>>
    Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this >>>>>>>>>> problem head-on
    with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters
    displayed in public
    places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual >>>>>>>>>> assault is a
    nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad >>>>>>>>>> behavior in
    action.

    The only problem?

    They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the >>>>>>>>>> migrants, instead
    of the other way around, the way it really happens literally >>>>>>>>>> 100% of the
    time:

    https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
    https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
    https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

    Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male >>>>>>>>>> sexual violence
    in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal >>>>>>>>>> aliens. It's
    really those horrible native German citizens who are
    assaulting the poor
    vulnerable migrants.

    Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus
    groping Muhammed's
    ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool. >>>>>>>>>> Apparently, the
    one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being >>>>>>>>>> raped by evil
    white women (and portly gay white men, too).

    "...this theory that they just don't know any better because >>>>>>>>> they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages." >>>>>>>>>
    What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?


    The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The
    offenders in these cases are told by their religion that women >>>>>>>> that don't dress modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas,
    depending on how strict their particular brand of Islam is) are >>>>>>>> prostitutes and aren't entitled to any respect from men. Pulling >>>>>>>> off their swimsuits - top or bottom - is perfectly okay for any >>>>>>>> Allah- fearing man.

    In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own >>>>>>>> women- only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman
    will swim (or walk around outside the house) without having her >>>>>>>> hair covered because Muslims apparently believe that men will be >>>>>>>> driven mad with lust at the sight of a woman's hair and the men >>>>>>>> can't be held responsible for acting on that lust.

    A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to >>>>>>>> be assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs.

    I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years >>>>>>>> back where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on
    his phone to the 70-something year old German woman sitting
    beside him on public transit. He kept trying to entice her into >>>>>>>> sexual activity with the German word "ficken", which means fuck >>>>>>>> in English.

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman >>>>>>> that its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous
    neglect. Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their
    boobs in a supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast
    principled stones?


    In my entire life, I have never seen a woman going topless in the
    supermarket so I really don't know what you're talking about. I
    haven't even heard women cluck to each other in semi-whispers
    about another woman who is showing more than the average amount of >>>>>> boob.

    For what it's worth, a woman in Guelph, Ontario effectively made
    it legal for women to go topless whenever they wanted (in Ontario) >>>>>> about 30 years ago.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_toplessness_in_Canada

    In any case, what do your remarks even have to do with Muslim men
    harassing women? You acknowledge that these are barbaric
    behaviours but you still seem to be hunting for some excuse for
    this behaviour. It seems like you're trying to root that excuse in >>>>>> some perceived hypocrisy among Westerners.

    I'm trying to point out that *our* mores aren't without "barbarisms". >>>>>

    No culture is perfect. In other breaking news, water is wet and it's
    going to be dark out tonight.

    The trick is to bear that in mind when punching down in culture wars.


    So because our culture is imperfect, we're not allowed to set any
    standards for anyone from a different culture until our own is perfect
    first?

    In other words the molestation and rape can carry on unabated and
    unpunished because we're not perfect yet?

    Whose "other words" are those?  What I continually suggest is that we carefully examine any stance based on our "moral superiority".


    That always sounds to me like you're saying we can't do ANYTHING about
    Problems X, Y, or Z because we're not perfect ourselves. Prove me wrong:
    List ONE thing that you'd be willing to see our Western societies do to
    stop people from other cultures molesting/raping women in the West.

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to moviePig on Tue Jul 15 18:45:58 2025
    On 2025-07-15 11:50 AM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 10:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 2:44:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 5:00 PM, Rhino wrote:
      On 2025-07-14 12:09 PM, moviePig wrote:
      On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:
      On 2025-07-13 4:19 PM, moviePig wrote:
      On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
      Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of Peace >>>>>>>>   to flood
      into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their >>>>>>>>   barbarity with
      them, the German government has been trying to tackle the problem >>>>>>>>   of brown men
      sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about
      everywhere. From
      public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the >>>>>>>> street
      in broad
      daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the
    predations
      of the
      Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon them >>>>>>>>   against
      their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches to >>>>>>>>   outright
      rape.

      The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent on >>>>>>>>   committing
      slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it >>>>>>>> happens
      and the
      courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply 'culturally >>>>>>>>   unaware' that
      rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim men >>>>>>>>   have been
      sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually >>>>>>>> full-
      on raping
      women under this theory that they just don't know any better >>>>>>>>   because they come
      from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages. >>>>>>>>
      Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this >>>>>>>>   problem head-on
      with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters
    displayed
      in public
      places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual >>>>>>>>   assault is a
      nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad >>>>>>>>   behavior in
      action.

      The only problem?

      They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the >>>>>>>>   migrants, instead
      of the other way around, the way it really happens literally 100% >>>>>>>>   of the
      time:

      https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
      https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
      https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

      Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male >>>>>>>>   sexual violence
      in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal >>>>>>>>   aliens. It's
      really those horrible native German citizens who are
    assaulting the
      poor
      vulnerable migrants.

      Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus groping >>>>>>>>   Muhammed's
      ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool. >>>>>>>>   Apparently, the
      one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being >>>>>>>> raped
      by evil
      white women (and portly gay white men, too).

      "...this theory that they just don't know any better because
    they come
      from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages."

      What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?


      The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The
    offenders in
      these cases are told by their religion that women that don't dress >>>>>>   modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how strict
    their
      particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and aren't
    entitled to
      any respect from men. Pulling off their swimsuits - top or bottom - >>>>>>   is perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing man.

      In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own >>>>>>   women- only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will >>>>>>   swim (or walk around outside the house) without having her hair >>>>>>   covered because Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven >>>>>>   mad with lust at the sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be >>>>>>   held responsible for acting on that lust.

      A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be >>>>>>   assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs.

      I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years >>>>>> back
      where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his
    phone to
      the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him on public >>>>>>   transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual activity with the >>>>>>   German word "ficken", which means fuck in English.

      I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman >>>>> that
      its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous neglect. >>>>>   Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their boobs in a >>>>>   supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast principled
    stones?


      In my entire life, I have never seen a woman going topless in the
      supermarket so I really don't know what you're talking about. I
    haven't
      even heard women cluck to each other in semi-whispers about another >>>>   woman who is showing more than the average amount of boob.
      For what it's worth, a woman in Guelph, Ontario effectively made it >>>>   legal for women to go topless whenever they wanted (in Ontario)
    about 30
      years ago.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_toplessness_in_Canada
      In any case, what do your remarks even have to do with Muslim men
      harassing women? You acknowledge that these are barbaric
    behaviours but
      you still seem to be hunting for some excuse for this behaviour. It >>>>   seems like you're trying to root that excuse in some perceived
    hypocrisy
      among Westerners.J

    I'm trying to point out that *our* mores aren't without "barbarisms".

    A woman walking around topless is not a barbarism-- well, maybe it is
    in the
    case of rhinoceroses on THE VIEW-- in a discussion about cultures that
    rewards
    blowing children to smithereens and throws gay people off high
    buildings and
    stones women to death for having had the bad luck to be gang-raped.

    Where logic is concerned, a rule against going topless is indeed a
    barbarism (...unless you open the social-discomfort can of worms).


    Gwen Jacobs and other women essentially won the right for women to go
    topless at their own discretion over 30 years ago in this country. Guess
    how many women I've seen going topless in nice weather in the
    intervening years: exactly NONE. (I'm not saying that no woman has gone
    topless in those years, just that I haven't seen it or even heard of
    anyone doing so.) In a nutshell, Jacobs and others fought for the
    principle of being able to go topless in public and chose not to
    exercise it very often once the principle was accepted by the courts. To whatever extent women have gone topless in this country, it hasn't
    caused a stir anywhere.

    I would hardly call the United States barbaric just because they haven't followed suit.

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 15 22:40:35 2025
    On 7/15/2025 6:14 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 15, 2025 at 2:48:13 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/15/2025 5:15 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 15, 2025 at 1:57:05 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>
    On 7/15/2025 3:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 15, 2025 at 8:44:17 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 11:03 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 3:43:16 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
    wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 6:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 5:44 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 5:00 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 12:09 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman
    that its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous
    neglect. Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their
    boobs in a supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast
    principled stones?

    In my entire life, I have never seen a woman going topless in the
    supermarket so I really don't know what you're talking about. I
    haven't even heard women cluck to each other in semi-whispers about
    another woman who is showing more than the average amount of boob.

    For what it's worth, a woman in Guelph, Ontario effectively made it
    legal for women to go topless whenever they wanted (in Ontario) about
    30 years ago.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_toplessness_in_Canada >>>>>>>>>>>
    In any case, what do your remarks even have to do with Muslim men
    harassing women? You acknowledge that these are barbaric behaviours
    but you still seem to be hunting for some excuse for this behaviour.
    It seems like you're trying to root that excuse in some perceived
    hypocrisy among Westerners.

    I'm trying to point out that *our* mores aren't without "barbarisms".

    No culture is perfect. In other breaking news, water is wet and it's
    going to be dark out tonight.

    The trick is to bear that in mind when punching down in culture wars.

    This is typically where the Islam apologist will shout, "Christians are
    just
    as bad. What about the Inquisition?!?"

    The proper response to which is, if you find yourself always having to
    reach
    back centuries, if not millennia, to find analogous Christian >>>>>>> examples to
    counter modern Muslim barbarity, you should do some serious >>>>>>> self-examination.

    Debates that reach into religion can't be won.

    But they certainly don't have to include importing the practitioners of
    those
    religions into your neighborhoods if they're going to be given official
    exemption from your laws and cultural norms due to their 'cultural >>>>> ignorance'.

    Our government, by long tradition, doesn't recognize specific religions. >>>
    But it can recognize actions.

    Actions, hairstyle, BMI, etc. ...just not religion.

    Great. So we just take note of which countries contribute these 'culturally unaware' people who commit these vile actions to the pool of immigrants and cut off those countries.

    If that's the finest accurate distinction you can make, then sure.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to Rhino on Tue Jul 15 22:37:59 2025
    On 7/15/2025 6:36 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-15 11:36 AM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 9:33 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 6:43 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 6:10 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 5:44 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 5:00 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-14 12:09 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-13 4:19 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of >>>>>>>>>>> Peace to flood
    into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their >>>>>>>>>>> barbarity with
    them, the German government has been trying to tackle the >>>>>>>>>>> problem of brown men
    sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about >>>>>>>>>>> everywhere. From
    public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the >>>>>>>>>>> street in broad
    daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the
    predations of the
    Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon >>>>>>>>>>> them against
    their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches >>>>>>>>>>> to outright
    rape.

    The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent >>>>>>>>>>> on committing
    slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it >>>>>>>>>>> happens and the
    courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply
    'culturally unaware' that
    rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim >>>>>>>>>>> men have been
    sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually >>>>>>>>>>> full- on raping
    women under this theory that they just don't know any better >>>>>>>>>>> because they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages. >>>>>>>>>>>
    Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle >>>>>>>>>>> this problem head-on
    with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters >>>>>>>>>>> displayed in public
    places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual >>>>>>>>>>> assault is a
    nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this >>>>>>>>>>> bad behavior in
    action.

    The only problem?

    They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the >>>>>>>>>>> migrants, instead
    of the other way around, the way it really happens literally >>>>>>>>>>> 100% of the
    time:

    https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
    https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
    https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

    Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of >>>>>>>>>>> male sexual violence
    in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal >>>>>>>>>>> aliens. It's
    really those horrible native German citizens who are
    assaulting the poor
    vulnerable migrants.

    Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus >>>>>>>>>>> groping Muhammed's
    ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool. >>>>>>>>>>> Apparently, the
    one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being >>>>>>>>>>> raped by evil
    white women (and portly gay white men, too).

    "...this theory that they just don't know any better because >>>>>>>>>> they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages." >>>>>>>>>>
    What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?


    The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The
    offenders in these cases are told by their religion that women >>>>>>>>> that don't dress modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas,
    depending on how strict their particular brand of Islam is) are >>>>>>>>> prostitutes and aren't entitled to any respect from men.
    Pulling off their swimsuits - top or bottom - is perfectly okay >>>>>>>>> for any Allah- fearing man.

    In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own >>>>>>>>> women- only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman >>>>>>>>> will swim (or walk around outside the house) without having her >>>>>>>>> hair covered because Muslims apparently believe that men will >>>>>>>>> be driven mad with lust at the sight of a woman's hair and the >>>>>>>>> men can't be held responsible for acting on that lust.

    A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to >>>>>>>>> be assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs. >>>>>>>>>
    I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of
    years back where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing
    porn on his phone to the 70-something year old German woman
    sitting beside him on public transit. He kept trying to entice >>>>>>>>> her into sexual activity with the German word "ficken", which >>>>>>>>> means fuck in English.

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and
    inhuman that its hard to see why they haven't expired from
    spontaneous neglect. Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who >>>>>>>> parade their boobs in a supermarket, what qualitatively entitles >>>>>>>> us to cast principled stones?


    In my entire life, I have never seen a woman going topless in the >>>>>>> supermarket so I really don't know what you're talking about. I
    haven't even heard women cluck to each other in semi-whispers
    about another woman who is showing more than the average amount
    of boob.

    For what it's worth, a woman in Guelph, Ontario effectively made >>>>>>> it legal for women to go topless whenever they wanted (in
    Ontario) about 30 years ago.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_toplessness_in_Canada

    In any case, what do your remarks even have to do with Muslim men >>>>>>> harassing women? You acknowledge that these are barbaric
    behaviours but you still seem to be hunting for some excuse for
    this behaviour. It seems like you're trying to root that excuse
    in some perceived hypocrisy among Westerners.

    I'm trying to point out that *our* mores aren't without "barbarisms". >>>>>>

    No culture is perfect. In other breaking news, water is wet and
    it's going to be dark out tonight.

    The trick is to bear that in mind when punching down in culture wars.


    So because our culture is imperfect, we're not allowed to set any
    standards for anyone from a different culture until our own is
    perfect first?

    In other words the molestation and rape can carry on unabated and
    unpunished because we're not perfect yet?

    Whose "other words" are those?  What I continually suggest is that we
    carefully examine any stance based on our "moral superiority".


    That always sounds to me like you're saying we can't do ANYTHING about Problems X, Y, or Z because we're not perfect ourselves. Prove me wrong:
    List ONE thing that you'd be willing to see our Western societies do to
    stop people from other cultures molesting/raping women in the West.

    I'd approve thoughtful actions not borne of bogus moral superiority.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to Rhino on Tue Jul 15 22:46:02 2025
    On 7/15/2025 6:45 PM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-15 11:50 AM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 10:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 2:44:48 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
    wrote:

    On 7/14/2025 5:00 PM, Rhino wrote:
      On 2025-07-14 12:09 PM, moviePig wrote:
      On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:
      On 2025-07-13 4:19 PM, moviePig wrote:
      On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
      Since allowing millions of practitioners of the Religion of >>>>>>>>> Peace
      to flood
      into their country and enrich their culture by bringing their >>>>>>>>>   barbarity with
      them, the German government has been trying to tackle the >>>>>>>>> problem
      of brown men
      sexually assaulting ethnic white German women just about
      everywhere. From
      public parks and pools, to the subways, and right out on the >>>>>>>>> street
      in broad
      daylight, German girls and women have had to endure the
    predations
      of the
      Muslim men their government has so thoughtfully foisted upon >>>>>>>>> them
      against
      their will-- everything from public groping and butt pinches to >>>>>>>>>   outright
      rape.

      The government, like most European nations that are hell-bent on >>>>>>>>>   committing
      slow motion national suicide, has downplayed it whenever it >>>>>>>>> happens
      and the
      courts officially excuse the perpetrators as simply 'culturally >>>>>>>>>   unaware' that
      rape is a no-no in Germany. In some notorious cases, Muslim men >>>>>>>>>   have been
      sentenced to mere probation for not just groping but actually >>>>>>>>> full-
      on raping
      women under this theory that they just don't know any better >>>>>>>>>   because they come
      from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages. >>>>>>>>>
      Now, however, the German government has decided to tackle this >>>>>>>>>   problem head-on
      with a public awareness campaign that consists of posters >>>>>>>>> displayed
      in public
      places all over the country, advising that groping and sexual >>>>>>>>>   assault is a
      nein-nein in Germany. The posters feature examples of this bad >>>>>>>>>   behavior in
      action.

      The only problem?

      They depict real-German white people sexually assaulting the >>>>>>>>>   migrants, instead
      of the other way around, the way it really happens literally >>>>>>>>> 100%
      of the
      time:

      https://ibb.co/jZkxY44y
      https://ibb.co/nqrymCJM
      https://ibb.co/rRVW6DMN

      Apparently we were all hallucinating that the epidemic of male >>>>>>>>>   sexual violence
      in Germany was being committed by the sweet innocent illegal >>>>>>>>>   aliens. It's
      really those horrible native German citizens who are
    assaulting the
      poor
      vulnerable migrants.

      Yes, there's an epidemic of middle-aged ginger hausfraus groping >>>>>>>>>   Muhammed's
      ass when he's just trying to enjoy a swim at the local pool. >>>>>>>>>   Apparently, the
      one-legged illegal aliens are especially vulnerable to being >>>>>>>>> raped
      by evil
      white women (and portly gay white men, too).

      "...this theory that they just don't know any better because >>>>>>>> they come
      from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages." >>>>>>>>
      What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?


      The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The
    offenders in
      these cases are told by their religion that women that don't dress >>>>>>>   modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how strict >>>>>>> their
      particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and aren't
    entitled to
      any respect from men. Pulling off their swimsuits - top or
    bottom -
      is perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing man.

      In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own >>>>>>>   women- only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will >>>>>>>   swim (or walk around outside the house) without having her hair >>>>>>>   covered because Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven >>>>>>>   mad with lust at the sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be >>>>>>>   held responsible for acting on that lust.

      A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be >>>>>>>   assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs.

      I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of
    years back
      where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his
    phone to
      the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him on
    public
      transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual activity with >>>>>>> the
      German word "ficken", which means fuck in English.

      I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and
    inhuman that
      its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous neglect. >>>>>>   Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their boobs in a >>>>>>   supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast principled
    stones?


      In my entire life, I have never seen a woman going topless in the >>>>>   supermarket so I really don't know what you're talking about. I
    haven't
      even heard women cluck to each other in semi-whispers about another >>>>>   woman who is showing more than the average amount of boob.
      For what it's worth, a woman in Guelph, Ontario effectively made it >>>>>   legal for women to go topless whenever they wanted (in Ontario)
    about 30
      years ago.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_toplessness_in_Canada
      In any case, what do your remarks even have to do with Muslim men >>>>>   harassing women? You acknowledge that these are barbaric
    behaviours but
      you still seem to be hunting for some excuse for this behaviour. It >>>>>   seems like you're trying to root that excuse in some perceived
    hypocrisy
      among Westerners.J

    I'm trying to point out that *our* mores aren't without "barbarisms".

    A woman walking around topless is not a barbarism-- well, maybe it is
    in the
    case of rhinoceroses on THE VIEW-- in a discussion about cultures
    that rewards
    blowing children to smithereens and throws gay people off high
    buildings and
    stones women to death for having had the bad luck to be gang-raped.

    Where logic is concerned, a rule against going topless is indeed a
    barbarism (...unless you open the social-discomfort can of worms).


    Gwen Jacobs and other women essentially won the right for women to go
    topless at their own discretion over 30 years ago in this country. Guess
    how many women I've seen going topless in nice weather in the
    intervening years: exactly NONE. (I'm not saying that no woman has gone topless in those years, just that I haven't seen it or even heard of
    anyone doing so.) In a nutshell, Jacobs and others fought for the
    principle of being able to go topless in public and chose not to
    exercise it very often once the principle was accepted by the courts. To whatever extent women have gone topless in this country, it hasn't
    caused a stir anywhere.

    I would hardly call the United States barbaric just because they haven't followed suit.

    Neither would I, but I'd recognize that it's just a difference of
    degree. In particular, women who bare their breasts are considered not
    merely lawbreakers, but morally corrupt (according to much of the
    public) ...similar to a Muslim woman who abandons her awning.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Wed Jul 16 18:24:29 2025
    On Jul 15, 2025 at 7:37:59 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/15/2025 6:36 PM, Rhino wrote:

    That always sounds to me like you're saying we can't do ANYTHING about
    Problems X, Y, or Z because we're not perfect ourselves. Prove me wrong:
    List ONE thing that you'd be willing to see our Western societies do to
    stop people from other cultures molesting/raping women in the West.

    I'd approve thoughtful actions not borne of bogus moral superiority.

    There's nothing bogus about it. Western American culture is objectively superior to a culture that rewards
    blowing children to smithereens, throws gay people off high buildings, and stones women to death for having had the bad luck to be gang-raped.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 16 15:17:44 2025
    On 7/16/2025 2:24 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 15, 2025 at 7:37:59 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/15/2025 6:36 PM, Rhino wrote:

    That always sounds to me like you're saying we can't do ANYTHING about >>> Problems X, Y, or Z because we're not perfect ourselves. Prove me wrong: >>> List ONE thing that you'd be willing to see our Western societies do to >>> stop people from other cultures molesting/raping women in the West.

    I'd approve thoughtful actions not borne of bogus moral superiority.

    There's nothing bogus about it. Western American culture is objectively superior to a culture that rewards
    blowing children to smithereens, throws gay people off high buildings, and stones women to death for having had the bad luck to be gang-raped.

    Yes, "objectively superior" according to *your* object lessons
    ...whereas a Muslim might say that any follower of Islam is, despite
    some occasional unpleasantness, perforce closer to God's perfection.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Wed Jul 16 20:13:46 2025
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 12:17:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/16/2025 2:24 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 15, 2025 at 7:37:59 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>
    On 7/15/2025 6:36 PM, Rhino wrote:

    That always sounds to me like you're saying we can't do ANYTHING about >>>> Problems X, Y, or Z because we're not perfect ourselves. Prove me wrong:
    List ONE thing that you'd be willing to see our Western societies do to >>>> stop people from other cultures molesting/raping women in the West.

    I'd approve thoughtful actions not borne of bogus moral superiority.

    There's nothing bogus about it. Western American culture is objectively
    superior to a culture that rewards
    blowing children to smithereens, throws gay people off high buildings, and >> stones women to death for having had the bad luck to be gang-raped.

    Yes, "objectively superior" according to *your* object lessons

    So murdering children, women, and gays is only wrong as a matter of
    perspective to you?

    Dear sweet weeping jeezus.

    ...whereas a Muslim might say that any follower of Islam is, despite
    some occasional unpleasantness, perforce closer to God's perfection.

    Who cares what they say? They're murdering children, women, and gays.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 16 17:27:26 2025
    On 7/16/2025 4:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 12:17:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/16/2025 2:24 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 15, 2025 at 7:37:59 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>
    On 7/15/2025 6:36 PM, Rhino wrote:

    That always sounds to me like you're saying we can't do ANYTHING about
    Problems X, Y, or Z because we're not perfect ourselves. Prove me wrong:
    List ONE thing that you'd be willing to see our Western societies do to
    stop people from other cultures molesting/raping women in the West. >>>>
    I'd approve thoughtful actions not borne of bogus moral superiority.

    There's nothing bogus about it. Western American culture is objectively >>> superior to a culture that rewards
    blowing children to smithereens, throws gay people off high buildings, and
    stones women to death for having had the bad luck to be gang-raped.

    Yes, "objectively superior" according to *your* object lessons

    So murdering children, women, and gays is only wrong as a matter of perspective to you?

    Dear sweet weeping jeezus.

    ...whereas a Muslim might say that any follower of Islam is, despite
    some occasional unpleasantness, perforce closer to God's perfection.

    Who cares what they say? They're murdering children, women, and gays.

    *All* morality is a matter of perspective, i.e., beliefs ...whether they
    come from Mt. Sinai or from the "still small voice" in one's head.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Thu Jul 17 05:08:45 2025
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 2:27:26 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/16/2025 4:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 12:17:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>
    On 7/16/2025 2:24 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 15, 2025 at 7:37:59 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/15/2025 6:36 PM, Rhino wrote:

    That always sounds to me like you're saying we can't do ANYTHING about
    Problems X, Y, or Z because we're not perfect ourselves. Prove me wrong:
    List ONE thing that you'd be willing to see our Western societies do to
    stop people from other cultures molesting/raping women in the West. >>>>>
    I'd approve thoughtful actions not borne of bogus moral superiority. >>>>
    There's nothing bogus about it. Western American culture is objectively >>>> superior to a culture that rewards
    blowing children to smithereens, throws gay people off high buildings, and
    stones women to death for having had the bad luck to be gang-raped.

    Yes, "objectively superior" according to *your* object lessons

    So murdering children, women, and gays is only wrong as a matter of
    perspective to you?

    Dear sweet weeping jeezus.

    ...whereas a Muslim might say that any follower of Islam is, despite
    some occasional unpleasantness, perforce closer to God's perfection.

    Who cares what they say? They're murdering children, women, and gays.

    *All* morality is a matter of perspective, i.e., beliefs ...whether they
    come from Mt. Sinai or from the "still small voice" in one's head.

    Let us know when you find out how many angels are dancing on your pinhead.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 17 11:07:09 2025
    On 7/17/2025 1:08 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 2:27:26 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/16/2025 4:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 12:17:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/16/2025 2:24 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 15, 2025 at 7:37:59 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/15/2025 6:36 PM, Rhino wrote:

    That always sounds to me like you're saying we can't do ANYTHING about
    Problems X, Y, or Z because we're not perfect ourselves. Prove me wrong:
    List ONE thing that you'd be willing to see our Western societies do to
    stop people from other cultures molesting/raping women in the West.

    I'd approve thoughtful actions not borne of bogus moral superiority. >>>>>
    There's nothing bogus about it. Western American culture is objectively
    superior to a culture that rewards
    blowing children to smithereens, throws gay people off high buildings, and
    stones women to death for having had the bad luck to be gang-raped. >>>>
    Yes, "objectively superior" according to *your* object lessons

    So murdering children, women, and gays is only wrong as a matter of
    perspective to you?

    Dear sweet weeping jeezus.

    ...whereas a Muslim might say that any follower of Islam is, despite >>>> some occasional unpleasantness, perforce closer to God's perfection.

    Who cares what they say? They're murdering children, women, and gays.

    *All* morality is a matter of perspective, i.e., beliefs ...whether they
    come from Mt. Sinai or from the "still small voice" in one's head.

    Let us know when you find out how many angels are dancing on your pinhead.

    Worry first about how many "us" is.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Thu Jul 17 16:56:49 2025
    On Jul 17, 2025 at 8:07:09 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/17/2025 1:08 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 2:27:26 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>
    On 7/16/2025 4:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 12:17:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/16/2025 2:24 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 15, 2025 at 7:37:59 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>>> wrote:

    On 7/15/2025 6:36 PM, Rhino wrote:

    That always sounds to me like you're saying we can't do ANYTHING about
    Problems X, Y, or Z because we're not perfect ourselves. Prove >>>>>>>> me wrong:
    List ONE thing that you'd be willing to see our Western >>>>>>>> societies do to
    stop people from other cultures molesting/raping women in the West.

    I'd approve thoughtful actions not borne of bogus moral superiority.

    There's nothing bogus about it. Western American culture is objectively
    superior to a culture that rewards
    blowing children to smithereens, throws gay people off high
    buildings, and
    stones women to death for having had the bad luck to be gang-raped. >>>>>
    Yes, "objectively superior" according to *your* object lessons

    So murdering children, women, and gays is only wrong as a matter of >>>> perspective to you?

    Dear sweet weeping jeezus.

    ...whereas a Muslim might say that any follower of Islam is, despite >>>>> some occasional unpleasantness, perforce closer to God's perfection. >>>>
    Who cares what they say? They're murdering children, women, and gays. >>>
    *All* morality is a matter of perspective, i.e., beliefs ...whether they >>> come from Mt. Sinai or from the "still small voice" in one's head.

    Let us know when you find out how many angels are dancing on your pinhead.

    Worry first about how many "us" is.

    That's easy. "Us" is everyone in the world but you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 17 13:38:14 2025
    On 7/17/2025 12:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 17, 2025 at 8:07:09 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/17/2025 1:08 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 2:27:26 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>
    On 7/16/2025 4:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 12:17:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/16/2025 2:24 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 15, 2025 at 7:37:59 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
    wrote:

    On 7/15/2025 6:36 PM, Rhino wrote:

    That always sounds to me like you're saying we can't do ANYTHING about
    Problems X, Y, or Z because we're not perfect ourselves. Prove
    me wrong:
    List ONE thing that you'd be willing to see our Western >>>>>>>>> societies do to
    stop people from other cultures molesting/raping women in the West.

    I'd approve thoughtful actions not borne of bogus moral superiority.

    There's nothing bogus about it. Western American culture is objectively
    superior to a culture that rewards
    blowing children to smithereens, throws gay people off high >>>>>>> buildings, and
    stones women to death for having had the bad luck to be gang-raped.

    Yes, "objectively superior" according to *your* object lessons

    So murdering children, women, and gays is only wrong as a matter of >>>>> perspective to you?

    Dear sweet weeping jeezus.

    ...whereas a Muslim might say that any follower of Islam is, despite >>>>>> some occasional unpleasantness, perforce closer to God's perfection. >>>>>
    Who cares what they say? They're murdering children, women, and gays. >>>>
    *All* morality is a matter of perspective, i.e., beliefs ...whether they >>>> come from Mt. Sinai or from the "still small voice" in one's head.

    Let us know when you find out how many angels are dancing on your pinhead.

    Worry first about how many "us" is.

    That's easy. "Us" is everyone in the world but you.

    Everyone in the world? Who knew you were so inclusive...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Thu Jul 17 18:09:33 2025
    On Jul 17, 2025 at 10:38:14 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/17/2025 12:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 17, 2025 at 8:07:09 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>
    On 7/17/2025 1:08 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 2:27:26 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 7/16/2025 4:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 16, 2025 at 12:17:44 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> >>>>>> wrote:

    On 7/16/2025 2:24 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jul 15, 2025 at 7:37:59 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
    wrote:

    On 7/15/2025 6:36 PM, Rhino wrote:

    That always sounds to me like you're saying we can't do >>>>>>>>>> ANYTHING about
    Problems X, Y, or Z because we're not perfect ourselves. Prove
    me wrong:
    List ONE thing that you'd be willing to see our Western >>>>>>>>>> societies do to
    stop people from other cultures molesting/raping women in the West.

    I'd approve thoughtful actions not borne of bogus moral superiority.

    There's nothing bogus about it. Western American culture is >>>>>>>> objectively
    superior to a culture that rewards
    blowing children to smithereens, throws gay people off high >>>>>>>> buildings, and
    stones women to death for having had the bad luck to be gang-raped.

    Yes, "objectively superior" according to *your* object lessons >>>>>>
    So murdering children, women, and gays is only wrong as a matter of >>>>>> perspective to you?

    Dear sweet weeping jeezus.

    ...whereas a Muslim might say that any follower of Islam is, despite
    some occasional unpleasantness, perforce closer to God's perfection.

    Who cares what they say? They're murdering children, women, and gays.

    *All* morality is a matter of perspective, i.e., beliefs ...whether they
    come from Mt. Sinai or from the "still small voice" in one's head. >>>>
    Let us know when you find out how many angels are dancing on your pinhead.

    Worry first about how many "us" is.

    That's easy. "Us" is everyone in the world but you.

    Everyone in the world? Who knew you were so inclusive...

    Yes, it's a public forum open to everyone globally who has an internet connection.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Thu Jul 17 18:49:42 2025
    On Jul 14, 2025 at 9:09:00 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
    On 7/14/2025 9:54 AM, Rhino wrote:
    On 2025-07-13 4:19 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 7/13/2025 3:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

    "...this theory that they just don't know any better because they come
    from countries that are culturally frozen in the Dark Ages."

    What's your conflicting -- and better -- theory?


    The reality is actually worse than BTR is inferring. The offenders in
    these cases are told by their religion that women that don't dress
    modestly (in hijabs, niqabs or burkas, depending on how strict their
    particular brand of Islam is) are prostitutes and aren't entitled to any
    respect from men. Pulling off their swimsuits - top or bottom - is
    perfectly okay for any Allah-fearing man.

    In their culture, women don't bathe with men and have their own women-
    only spaces for bathing and swimming. No Muslim woman will swim (or walk
    around outside the house) without having her hair covered because
    Muslims apparently believe that men will be driven mad with lust at the
    sight of a woman's hair and the men can't be held responsible for acting
    on that lust.

    A Western woman - any Western woman of any age - is begging to be
    assaulted if she shows her hair or her bare arms or legs.

    I remember seeing a video from Hamburg Germany a couple of years back
    where a 30-something migrant insisted on showing porn on his phone to
    the 70-something year old German woman sitting beside him on public
    transit. He kept trying to entice her into sexual activity with the
    German word "ficken", which means fuck in English.

    I agree that such attitudes are so obscenely backward and inhuman that
    its hard to see why they haven't expired from spontaneous neglect.
    Otoh, since (e.g.) *we* condemn women who parade their boobs in a supermarket, what qualitatively entitles us to cast principled stones?

    Immigrants from low-trust countries have been measured to remain low-trust up to the fourth generation, with no further assimilation since the second generation. Mass low-trust immigration can permanently turn your high-trust society into a low-trust society very quickly.

    The Left's solution: Even more immigration!

    https://ibb.co/VcWNjqNh

    Source: Garett Jones, The Culture Transplant (2022); adapted from Yann Algan and Pierre Cahuc, "Inherited Trust and Growth", American Economic Review
    (2010)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 18 01:43:34 2025
    On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:27:26 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
    wrote:

    *All* morality is a matter of perspective, i.e., beliefs ...whether they
    come from Mt. Sinai or from the "still small voice" in one's head.


    So if some extremist Muslims want to boink preteens because 1300 years
    ago, Muhammed is supposed to have consummated his marriage with a 9
    year old is totally cool and OK with you?

    Uh.....

    Guess what - to me that's like saying "Back in the 11th and 12th
    centuries knights were going long distances to wage holy war" is a
    good reason to bring back Crusades.

    Uh.....

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 18 01:37:31 2025
    On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 17:48:13 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
    wrote:

    Our government, by long tradition, doesn't recognize specific religions.

    But it can recognize actions.

    Actions, hairstyle, BMI, etc. ...just not religion.

    Canada had a case a couple of years ago of a Muslim woman who wanted
    both her citizenship ceremony and her passport with veil. They told
    her no on the passport and offered her a private swearing in with a
    female judge but that she had to show her entire face to the judge.
    She said no and I don't know what the final outcome was. I >think< she
    was told "there's an open offer on the female judge so let us know
    when you're ready - oh and by the way, while your application has been
    accepted it's only good till the end of this year so if your swearing
    in doesn't happen before next year you will have to re-apply.

    I also don't know what the objection was to unveiling in front of a
    female judge with nobody but other women (court staff) in the room.

    I mean honestly, there is accommodation and letting the government be
    pushed around which they were decidedly NOT on for.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to The Horny Goat on Fri Jul 18 17:30:36 2025
    The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:

    Canada had a case a couple of years ago of a Muslim woman who wanted
    both her citizenship ceremony and her passport with veil. They told
    her no on the passport and offered her a private swearing in with a
    female judge but that she had to show her entire face to the judge.
    She said no and I don't know what the final outcome was. I >think< she
    was told "there's an open offer on the female judge so let us know
    when you're ready - oh and by the way, while your application has been >accepted it's only good till the end of this year so if your swearing
    in doesn't happen before next year you will have to re-apply.

    I also don't know what the objection was to unveiling in front of a
    female judge with nobody but other women (court staff) in the room.

    I mean honestly, there is accommodation and letting the government be
    pushed around which they were decidedly NOT on for.

    Hence, the Church of the Flying Spaghettin Monster, may you be touched
    by His Noodly Appendage.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to The Horny Goat on Fri Jul 18 16:32:09 2025
    On 7/18/2025 4:43 AM, The Horny Goat wrote:
    On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 17:27:26 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
    wrote:

    *All* morality is a matter of perspective, i.e., beliefs ...whether they
    come from Mt. Sinai or from the "still small voice" in one's head.


    So if some extremist Muslims want to boink preteens because 1300 years
    ago, Muhammed is supposed to have consummated his marriage with a 9
    year old is totally cool and OK with you?

    Uh.....

    Guess what - to me that's like saying "Back in the 11th and 12th
    centuries knights were going long distances to wage holy war" is a
    good reason to bring back Crusades.

    Uh.....

    Not sure what any of this has to do with what is/isn't "totally cool and
    OK" with me...

    ...but...

    ...why is it surprising to find that our notions of Eternal & Absolute
    Morality do, in fact, shift with time and place?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)