How long before he gets the knock of doom on his door from Scotland Yard's thought police?

https://youtu.be/dC361PXoAUU?t=180

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

How long before he gets the knock of doom on his door from Scotland Yard's thought police?

https://youtu.be/dC361PXoAUU?t=180

Why can’t the Muslims eat the midges?



--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 22:36:59 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:

How long before he gets the knock of doom on his door from Scotland Yard's >thought police?

https://youtu.be/dC361PXoAUU?t=180

Sounds like he is doing what many politicians do and look for a group
to blame for all the problems. He never address what the reporter
brings up about the overwhelming number of white people grooming (or
raping) girls over talking about the limited number of Pakistanis
doing the same. He keeps addressing Pakistanis while ignoring it's a
problem that crosses races.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 22:36:59 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:

How long before he gets the knock of doom on his door from Scotland Yard's >> thought police?

https://youtu.be/dC361PXoAUU?t=180

Sounds like he is doing what many politicians do and look for a group
to blame for all the problems. He never address what the reporter
brings up about the overwhelming number of white people grooming (or
raping) girls over talking about the limited number of Pakistanis
doing the same. He keeps addressing Pakistanis while ignoring it's a
problem that crosses races.

The reason the Pakistanis are different is because

(1) It’s a self-inflicted problem. There's no reason for the British government to be allowing hundreds of thousands of illegals from barbaric societies to remain in the country, yet it seems eager to do so.

(2) The Pakistanis are the only culprits who are ignored and even actively covered for by the government. The reason the reporter knew the number of whites who had committed the same crime is because the cops arrested and prosecuted them when they were discovered and caught. They don't do that
with Pakistanis. They look the other way, pretend it isn't happening, and
even try and talk victims out of even reporting the crimes, telling them
it'll cause social unrest and incite hatred if they do. They basically tell them to take one for the team for love of country.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 7/24/2025 10:01 PM, shawn wrote:

On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 22:36:59 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:

How long before he gets the knock of doom on his door from Scotland Yard's >> thought police?

https://youtu.be/dC361PXoAUU?t=180

Sounds like he is doing what many politicians do and look for a group
to blame for all the problems. He never address what the reporter
brings up about the overwhelming number of white people grooming (or
raping) girls over talking about the limited number of Pakistanis
doing the same. He keeps addressing Pakistanis while ignoring it's a
problem that crosses races.

I kept expecting him to manifest an unarguably conclusive statistic...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2025-07-24 6:36 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

How long before he gets the knock of doom on his door from Scotland Yard's thought police?

https://youtu.be/dC361PXoAUU?t=180

Lowe has some money and isn't likely to be shut down by some officious cop.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rupert_Lowe

--
Rhino

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2025-07-24 22:36:59 +0000, BTR1701 said:

How long before he gets the knock of doom on his door from Scotland Yard's thought police?

https://youtu.be/dC361PXoAUU?t=180

I remember reading about some former British politician a year or two
ago who said, "Americans aren't very smart." That seemed pretty astute
to me.

BTW I wouldn't be throwing stones at the Brits for having "thought
police" in the age of Trump 2.0.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2025-07-24 10:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

On Thu, 24 Jul 2025 22:36:59 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:

How long before he gets the knock of doom on his door from Scotland Yard's >>> thought police?

https://youtu.be/dC361PXoAUU?t=180

Sounds like he is doing what many politicians do and look for a group
to blame for all the problems. He never address what the reporter
brings up about the overwhelming number of white people grooming (or
raping) girls over talking about the limited number of Pakistanis
doing the same. He keeps addressing Pakistanis while ignoring it's a
problem that crosses races.

The reason the Pakistanis are different is because

(1) It’s a self-inflicted problem. There's no reason for the British government to be allowing hundreds of thousands of illegals from barbaric societies to remain in the country, yet it seems eager to do so.

I was gobsmacked to learn that the Labour government of Prime Minister
Starmer is planning to spend 3 or 4 billion pounds on a brand new
airport *IN PAKISTAN* to make it even easier for the Pakistanis to
travel between their home area and Britain. Apparently, most of
Britain's Pakistanis come from a specific area - whose name I have
forgotten - which is 3 or 4 hours drive from the nearest existing
airport so Starmer wants to build them a new airport.

It's not like Britain is in good shape economically right now. Costs are already through the roof on a lot of items, especially energy. They are spending staggering sums housing the illegal immigrants that arrive by
the hundreds every single day. These illegal immigrants get moved to the
head of the list for things like health care, ahead of British citizens
and taxpayers.

(2) The Pakistanis are the only culprits who are ignored and even actively covered for by the government. The reason the reporter knew the number of whites who had committed the same crime is because the cops arrested and prosecuted them when they were discovered and caught. They don't do that
with Pakistanis. They look the other way, pretend it isn't happening, and even try and talk victims out of even reporting the crimes, telling them it'll cause social unrest and incite hatred if they do. They basically tell them to take one for the team for love of country.

This ignoring of the Pakistanis offences didn't begin recently either.
An essayist I like to read, Theodore Dalrymple, was writing about this
30 years ago and he knew this first hand because he was a doctor
(psychiatrist) in an inner-city hospital in Birmingham. (He also worked
in the nearby prison a couple of days a week.) He saw cases of grievous
child or spousal abuse that went unreported by the hospital because the
obvious perpetrator was not white, typically black or Muslim.

--
Rhino

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 7/25/2025 1:03 AM, super70s wrote:

On 2025-07-24 22:36:59 +0000, BTR1701 said:

How long before he gets the knock of doom on his door from Scotland
Yard's
thought police?

https://youtu.be/dC361PXoAUU?t=180

I remember reading about some former British politician a year or two
ago who said, "Americans aren't very smart." That seemed pretty astute
to me.

BTW I wouldn't be throwing stones at the Brits for having "thought
police" in the age of Trump 2.0.

Cue snark about Trump's supporters having thoughts...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Jul 24, 2025 at 10:03:26 PM PDT, "super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

On 2025-07-24 22:36:59 +0000, BTR1701 said:

How long before he gets the knock of doom on his door from Scotland Yard's >> thought police?

https://youtu.be/dC361PXoAUU?t=180

I remember reading about some former British politician a year or two
ago who said, "Americans aren't very smart." That seemed pretty astute
to me.

BTW I wouldn't be throwing stones at the Brits for having "thought
police" in the age of Trump 2.0.

It wasn't Trump that was using the FBI to lean on the social media companies
to censor everything from Wuhan Flu origins to Joe Biden's transformation into a walking vegetable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2025-07-25 17:34:55 +0000, BTR1701 said:

On Jul 24, 2025 at 10:03:26 PM PDT, "super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

On 2025-07-24 22:36:59 +0000, BTR1701 said:

How long before he gets the knock of doom on his door from Scotland Yard's >>> thought police?

https://youtu.be/dC361PXoAUU?t=180

I remember reading about some former British politician a year or two
ago who said, "Americans aren't very smart." That seemed pretty astute
to me.

BTW I wouldn't be throwing stones at the Brits for having "thought
police" in the age of Trump 2.0.

It wasn't Trump that was using the FBI to lean on the social media companies to censor everything from Wuhan Flu origins to Joe Biden's transformation into
a walking vegetable.

So he'll refuse to weaponize the FBI now because two wrongs don't make
a right, right? Wrong.

Any former FBI employee will tell you the agency has turned into joke
now. Same with the DOJ and DOD.

Sleep soundly.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Jul 25, 2025 at 2:32:30 PM PDT, "super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

On 2025-07-25 17:34:55 +0000, BTR1701 said:

On Jul 24, 2025 at 10:03:26 PM PDT, "super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> >> wrote:

On 2025-07-24 22:36:59 +0000, BTR1701 said:

How long before he gets the knock of doom on his door from Scotland Yard's
thought police?

https://youtu.be/dC361PXoAUU?t=180

I remember reading about some former British politician a year or two
ago who said, "Americans aren't very smart." That seemed pretty astute
to me.

BTW I wouldn't be throwing stones at the Brits for having "thought
police" in the age of Trump 2.0.

It wasn't Trump that was using the FBI to lean on the social media companies
to censor everything from Wuhan Flu origins to Joe Biden's transformation >> into
a walking vegetable.

So he'll refuse to weaponize the FBI now because two wrongs don't make
a right, right? Wrong.

And you'll only criticize the president now for what you admit is a wrong because he's a Republican. Silence from you when a Democrat was doing it.

You have no credibility here.

Any former FBI employee will tell you the agency has turned into joke
now. Same with the DOJ and DOD.

Sleep soundly.

I actually know plenty of current and former FBI agents and none of them have told me the agency is a joke. They do say some past employees have been the equivalent of jokes, like the former DAD of Counterintelligence, Peter Strzok, who, along with the FBI lawyer he was banging on the sly, were texting back
and forth about how they were going to use their positions to see to it that Trump didn't become president.

But since they were working on behalf of Hillary, I'm sure you slept soundly while the highest levels of the FBI were doing that.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

On Jul 25, 2025 at 2:32:30 PM PDT, "super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> >wrote:

On 2025-07-25 17:34:55 +0000, BTR1701 said:

On Jul 24, 2025 at 10:03:26 PM PDT, "super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> >>> wrote:

On 2025-07-24 22:36:59 +0000, BTR1701 said:

How long before he gets the knock of doom on his door from Scotland Yard's
thought police?

https://youtu.be/dC361PXoAUU?t=180

I remember reading about some former British politician a year or two >>>> ago who said, "Americans aren't very smart." That seemed pretty astute >>>> to me.

BTW I wouldn't be throwing stones at the Brits for having "thought
police" in the age of Trump 2.0.

It wasn't Trump that was using the FBI to lean on the social media companies
to censor everything from Wuhan Flu origins to Joe Biden's transformation >>> into
a walking vegetable.

So he'll refuse to weaponize the FBI now because two wrongs don't make
a right, right? Wrong.

And you'll only criticize the president now for what you admit is a wrong >because he's a Republican. Silence from you when a Democrat was doing it.

You have no credibility here.

Any former FBI employee will tell you the agency has turned into joke
now. Same with the DOJ and DOD.

Sleep soundly.

I actually know plenty of current and former FBI agents and none of them have >told me the agency is a joke. They do say some past employees have been the >equivalent of jokes, like the former DAD of Counterintelligence, Peter Strzok, >who, along with the FBI lawyer he was banging on the sly, were texting back >and forth about how they were going to use their positions to see to it that >Trump didn't become president.

. . . whilst living across the street from Philip and Elizabeth and
being blackmailed by the Russian Rezident.

But since they were working on behalf of Hillary, I'm sure you slept soundly >while the highest levels of the FBI were doing that.

This would make a great tv series.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 07:45:38 -0400, Rhino
<no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

This ignoring of the Pakistanis offences didn't begin recently either.
An essayist I like to read, Theodore Dalrymple, was writing about this
30 years ago and he knew this first hand because he was a doctor >(psychiatrist) in an inner-city hospital in Birmingham. (He also worked
in the nearby prison a couple of days a week.) He saw cases of grievous
child or spousal abuse that went unreported by the hospital because the >obvious perpetrator was not white, typically black or Muslim.

It's bad enough when this abuse is within the Pakistani community.
It's worse when the victims of the Pakistani abusers (and lets' call a
spade a spade - it's NOT "people of color" or Muslims generally - it's specifically Pakistanis mostly from a particular region of Pakistan -
who have preyed on mostly British young women as young as 11-12 with
the majority under the age of consent from working class familities.
Most are white but a smaller percentage are Sikh or other Indian
groups And has been going on for 30+ years - that's the most shocking
part of the scandal. On top of this several of the victims have either
become pregnant, drug addicted, battered or all of the above.

And don't pretend Keir Starmer doesn't personally know about it -
before going into politics Starmer was a Crown Prosecutor (in US terms
that would be "State's Attorney") in several of these cases - so he
definitely knows

What he also knows is that there are numerous parliamentary seats whee
"the Pakistani vote" is critical to his re-election chances.

So the abuse goes on even 35-40 years later.

It's well documented and anybody wanting to know more should go to
Youtube and enter "UK Grooming Scandal" It is concentrated in northern
England but there are reports throughout the UK.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

In article <1060tpf$16f58$4@dont-email.me>, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:

On Jul 25, 2025 at 2:32:30 PM PDT, "super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

On 2025-07-25 17:34:55 +0000, BTR1701 said:

On Jul 24, 2025 at 10:03:26 PM PDT, "super70s"
<super70s@super70s.invalid>
wrote:

On 2025-07-24 22:36:59 +0000, BTR1701 said:

How long before he gets the knock of doom on his door from Scotland >>>> Yard's thought police?

https://youtu.be/dC361PXoAUU?t=180

I remember reading about some former British politician a year or two >>> ago who said, "Americans aren't very smart." That seemed pretty
astute to me.

BTW I wouldn't be throwing stones at the Brits for having "thought
police" in the age of Trump 2.0.

It wasn't Trump that was using the FBI to lean on the social media
companies to censor everything from Wuhan Flu origins to Joe Biden's
transformation into a walking vegetable.

BTW what are you going to do in two or three years when Trump displays
the same symptoms of an aging man in his 80's that Biden did (assuming
Trump lives that long)? Shame people for being "disrespectful"?

Get ready because I'm coming down hard on the "walking vegetable" as you
so ineloquently put it.

So he'll refuse to weaponize the FBI now because two wrongs don't make
a right, right? Wrong.

And you'll only criticize the president now for what you admit is a wrong because he's a Republican. Silence from you when a Democrat was doing it.

You have no credibility here.

Any former FBI employee will tell you the agency has turned into joke
now. Same with the DOJ and DOD.

Sleep soundly.

I actually know plenty of current and former FBI agents and none of them have told me the agency is a joke.

Well they're different than the ones you see interviewed all the time,
they must all be new Trump hires.

They do say some past employees have been the equivalent of jokes, like the former DAD of Counterintelligence, Peter Strzok, who, along with the FBI lawyer
he was banging on the sly, were texting back and forth about how they were going to use their positions to see to it that Trump didn't become president.

Strzok is a favorite Trump bogeyman and object of his election
conspiracy lies, why am I not surprised you're bringing him up?

BTW your hero is the about the last person on earth who should be
complaining about extra-marital "banging."

But since they were working on behalf of Hillary,

Total BS.

I'm sure you slept soundly while the highest levels of the FBI were doing that.

I admit who my political opposites are banging doesn't keep me up at
night, apparently it does for you.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

In article <1060tpf$16f58$4@dont-email.me>, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:

On Jul 25, 2025 at 2:32:30 PM PDT, "super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid>
wrote:

On 2025-07-25 17:34:55 +0000, BTR1701 said:

On Jul 24, 2025 at 10:03:26 PM PDT, "super70s"
<super70s@super70s.invalid>
wrote:

On 2025-07-24 22:36:59 +0000, BTR1701 said:

How long before he gets the knock of doom on his door from Scotland >>>>>> Yard's thought police?

https://youtu.be/dC361PXoAUU?t=180

I remember reading about some former British politician a year or two >>>>> ago who said, "Americans aren't very smart." That seemed pretty
astute to me.

BTW I wouldn't be throwing stones at the Brits for having "thought
police" in the age of Trump 2.0.

It wasn't Trump that was using the FBI to lean on the social media
companies to censor everything from Wuhan Flu origins to Joe Biden's
transformation into a walking vegetable.

BTW what are you going to do in two or three years when Trump displays
the same symptoms of an aging man in his 80's that Biden did (assuming
Trump lives that long)? Shame people for being "disrespectful"?

Nope, I'll advocate that he step aside and let Vance take over.

Get ready because I'm coming down hard on the "walking vegetable" as you
so ineloquently put it.

You're not as scary as you seem to think you are.

So he'll refuse to weaponize the FBI now because two wrongs don't make
a right, right? Wrong.

And you'll only criticize the president now for what you admit is a wrong
because he's a Republican. Silence from you when a Democrat was doing it.

You have no credibility here.

Any former FBI employee will tell you the agency has turned into joke
now. Same with the DOJ and DOD.

Sleep soundly.

I actually know plenty of current and former FBI agents and none of them have
told me the agency is a joke.

Well they're different than the ones you see interviewed all the time,
they must all be new Trump hires.

Or the legacy corporate media only interviews the ones that advance the
Agenda.

They do say some past employees have been the equivalent of jokes, like the >> former DAD of Counterintelligence, Peter Strzok, who, along with the FBI lawyer
he was banging on the sly, were texting back and forth about how they were >> going to use their positions to see to it that Trump didn't become president.

Strzok is a favorite Trump bogeyman and object of his election
conspiracy lies, why am I not surprised you're bringing him up?

You're not surprised because he is the very definition of the "joke FBI
agent" that you condemned, just inconvenient for you that he was working on behalf of the Wicked Witch of Chappequa rather than Trump.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2025-07-27 06:12:06 +0000, BTR1701 said:

super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

In article <1060tpf$16f58$4@dont-email.me>, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
wrote:

On Jul 25, 2025 at 2:32:30 PM PDT, "super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> >>> wrote:

On 2025-07-25 17:34:55 +0000, BTR1701 said:

On Jul 24, 2025 at 10:03:26 PM PDT, "super70s"
<super70s@super70s.invalid>
wrote:

On 2025-07-24 22:36:59 +0000, BTR1701 said:

How long before he gets the knock of doom on his door from Scotland >>>>>>> Yard's thought police?

https://youtu.be/dC361PXoAUU?t=180

I remember reading about some former British politician a year or two >>>>>> ago who said, "Americans aren't very smart." That seemed pretty
astute to me.

BTW I wouldn't be throwing stones at the Brits for having "thought >>>>>> police" in the age of Trump 2.0.

It wasn't Trump that was using the FBI to lean on the social media
companies to censor everything from Wuhan Flu origins to Joe Biden's >>>>> transformation into a walking vegetable.

BTW what are you going to do in two or three years when Trump displays
the same symptoms of an aging man in his 80's that Biden did (assuming
Trump lives that long)? Shame people for being "disrespectful"?

Nope, I'll advocate that he step aside and let Vance take over.

Get ready because I'm coming down hard on the "walking vegetable" as you
so ineloquently put it.

You're not as scary as you seem to think you are.

So he'll refuse to weaponize the FBI now because two wrongs don't make >>>> a right, right? Wrong.

And you'll only criticize the president now for what you admit is a wrong >>> because he's a Republican. Silence from you when a Democrat was doing it. >>>
You have no credibility here.

Any former FBI employee will tell you the agency has turned into joke
now. Same with the DOJ and DOD.

Sleep soundly.

I actually know plenty of current and former FBI agents and none of them have
told me the agency is a joke.

Well they're different than the ones you see interviewed all the time,
they must all be new Trump hires.

Or the legacy corporate media only interviews the ones that advance the Agenda.

They do say some past employees have been the equivalent of jokes, like the >>> former DAD of Counterintelligence, Peter Strzok, who, along with the FBI lawyer
he was banging on the sly, were texting back and forth about how they were >>> going to use their positions to see to it that Trump didn't become president.

Strzok is a favorite Trump bogeyman and object of his election
conspiracy lies, why am I not surprised you're bringing him up?

You're not surprised because he is the very definition of the "joke FBI agent" that you condemned, just inconvenient for you that he was working on behalf of the Wicked Witch of Chappequa rather than Trump.

Trump had plenty of ties to Russia -- Don Jr. even admitted as much
however unwittingly -- and an investigation into that about Trump's and
Michael Flynn's actions leading up to the 2016 election was fully
justified. Investigations by both the House and Senate concluded they
were done properly.

His firing by Bill Barr's DOJ just before he was eligible for
retirement pay was just an act of revenge and example of Trump's
weaponization of that department which has only gotten worse in the
second term.

The DOJ agreed to settle a privacy invasion lawsuit brought by Strzok
and Page. He has a right to his personal opinion just like you or me
and the claim that he was "working for Hillary" is total BS you got
from Dear Leader.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

super70s@super70s.invalid wrote:

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

"super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

On 2025-07-25 17:34:55 +0000, BTR1701 said:

"super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

On 2025-07-24 22:36:59 +0000, BTR1701 said:

How long before he gets the knock of doom on his door from Scotland
Yard's thought police?

https://youtu.be/dC361PXoAUU?t=180

I remember reading about some former British politician a year or two >> >>> ago who said, "Americans aren't very smart." That seemed pretty
astute to me.

BTW I wouldn't be throwing stones at the Brits for having "thought
police" in the age of Trump 2.0.

It wasn't Trump that was using the FBI to lean on the social media
companies to censor everything from Wuhan Flu origins to Joe Biden's
transformation into a walking vegetable.

BTW what are you going to do in two or three years when Trump displays
the same symptoms of an aging man in his 80's that Biden did (assuming
Trump lives that long)? Shame people for being "disrespectful"?

We'll cross that bridge if it ever comes up, but unlike you, we won't make excuses for it.

Get ready because I'm coming down hard on the "walking vegetable" as you
so ineloquently put it.

Hopefully, you've had enough practice in caes it actually happens.

They do say some past employees have been the equivalent of jokes, like the >> former DAD of Counterintelligence, Peter Strzok, who, along with the FBI
lawyer he was banging on the sly, were texting back and forth about how
they were going to use their positions to see to it that Trump didn't
become president.

Strzok is a favorite Trump bogeyman and object of his election
conspiracy lies, why am I not surprised you're bringing him up?

BTW your hero is the about the last person on earth who should be
complaining about extra-marital "banging."

Deflection noted.

But since they were working on behalf of Hillary,

Total BS.

Do keep up with the rest of us. It's been proven.

I'm sure you slept soundly while the highest levels of the FBI were
doing that.

I admit who my political opposites are banging doesn't keep me up at
night, apparently it does for you.

Well, there you go accusing others of what you practice again!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

In article <10685lg$275eo$1@dont-email.me>, super70s@super70s.invalid wrote:

On 2025-07-27 06:12:06 +0000, BTR1701 said:

super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

"super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

On 2025-07-25 17:34:55 +0000, BTR1701 said:

"super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:

Any former FBI employee will tell you the agency has turned into joke >>>>> now. Same with the DOJ and DOD.

I actually know plenty of current and former FBI agents and none of them >>>> have told me the agency is a joke.

They do say some past employees have been the equivalent of jokes, like >>>> the former DAD of Counterintelligence, Peter Strzok, who, along with the >>>> FBI lawyer he was banging on the sly, were texting back and forth about >>>> how they were going to use their positions to see to it that Trump didn't >>>> become president.

Strzok is a favorite Trump bogeyman and object of his election
conspiracy lies, why am I not surprised you're bringing him up?

You're not surprised because he is the very definition of the "joke FBI
agent" that you condemned, just inconvenient for you that he was working on >> behalf of the Wicked Witch of Chappequa rather than Trump.

Trump had plenty of ties to Russia -- Don Jr. even admitted as much
however unwittingly -- and an investigation into that about Trump's and >Michael Flynn's actions leading up to the 2016 election was fully
justified. Investigations by both the House and Senate concluded they
were done properly.

TROLL-O-METER

5* 6* *7
4* *8
3* *9
2* *10
1* | *stuporous
0* -*- *catatonic
* |\ *comatose
* \ *clinical death
* \ *biological death
* _\/ *demonic apparition
* * *damned for all eternity

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)