• [OT] Free speech in UK

    From Rhino@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 12 16:25:17 2025
    In this episode of Triggernometry, Francis and Konstantin discuss the
    state of free speech in the UK with the head of the Free Speech Union
    and it's not a pretty picture. The statistics he gives at the end of the
    video are particularly concerning with roughly 30 Brits a day being
    arrested for free speech infringements and twice that number having
    Non-Crime Hate Incidents recorded against them.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xorkq9jX5k [67 minutes]

    Americans will be gratified to hear Justice Brandeis spoken of very
    favourably at one point.

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 12 21:17:41 2025
    On Aug 12, 2025 at 1:25:17 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    In this episode of Triggernometry, Francis and Konstantin discuss the
    state of free speech in the UK with the head of the Free Speech Union
    and it's not a pretty picture. The statistics he gives at the end of the video are particularly concerning with roughly 30 Brits a day being
    arrested for free speech infringements and twice that number having
    Non-Crime Hate Incidents recorded against them.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xorkq9jX5k [67 minutes]

    Americans will be gratified to hear Justice Brandeis spoken of very favourably at one point.

    I wonder what they do with foreigners with these 'non-crime hate incidents"? I mean, if I'm not a Brit and am only there for a limited time, what do I care
    if they log one of these made-up nonsense crimes against me? If you laugh at them when they get all serious and tell you it's going in your permanent record, do they stamp their foot and cry?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rhino@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 12 17:32:39 2025
    On 2025-08-12 5:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Aug 12, 2025 at 1:25:17 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    In this episode of Triggernometry, Francis and Konstantin discuss the
    state of free speech in the UK with the head of the Free Speech Union
    and it's not a pretty picture. The statistics he gives at the end of the
    video are particularly concerning with roughly 30 Brits a day being
    arrested for free speech infringements and twice that number having
    Non-Crime Hate Incidents recorded against them.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xorkq9jX5k [67 minutes]

    Americans will be gratified to hear Justice Brandeis spoken of very
    favourably at one point.

    I wonder what they do with foreigners with these 'non-crime hate incidents"? I
    mean, if I'm not a Brit and am only there for a limited time, what do I care if they log one of these made-up nonsense crimes against me? If you laugh at them when they get all serious and tell you it's going in your permanent record, do they stamp their foot and cry?


    Great question but I have no idea what the consequences are for
    foreigners offending the rules in the UK. I wonder if that would be
    grounds for deporting you or at least refusing you entry to the UK in
    the future?

    These zealots are quite capable of enforcing their wills on people if
    they really want to do so....

    --
    Rhino

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From anim8rfsk@21:1/5 to Rhino on Tue Aug 12 17:18:15 2025
    Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
    On 2025-08-12 5:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Aug 12, 2025 at 1:25:17 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> >> wrote:

    In this episode of Triggernometry, Francis and Konstantin discuss the
    state of free speech in the UK with the head of the Free Speech Union
    and it's not a pretty picture. The statistics he gives at the end of the >>> video are particularly concerning with roughly 30 Brits a day being
    arrested for free speech infringements and twice that number having
    Non-Crime Hate Incidents recorded against them.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xorkq9jX5k [67 minutes]

    Americans will be gratified to hear Justice Brandeis spoken of very
    favourably at one point.

    I wonder what they do with foreigners with these 'non-crime hate incidents"? I
    mean, if I'm not a Brit and am only there for a limited time, what do I care >> if they log one of these made-up nonsense crimes against me? If you laugh at >> them when they get all serious and tell you it's going in your permanent
    record, do they stamp their foot and cry?


    Great question but I have no idea what the consequences are for
    foreigners offending the rules in the UK. I wonder if that would be
    grounds for deporting you or

    Or worse, making you stay


    at least refusing you entry to the UK in
    the future?

    These zealots are quite capable of enforcing their wills on people if
    they really want to do so....




    --
    The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to All on Wed Aug 13 23:15:01 2025
    On Aug 12, 2025 at 1:25:17 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    In this episode of Triggernometry, Francis and Konstantin discuss the
    state of free speech in the UK with the head of the Free Speech Union
    and it's not a pretty picture. The statistics he gives at the end of the video are particularly concerning with roughly 30 Brits a day being
    arrested for free speech infringements and twice that number having
    Non-Crime Hate Incidents recorded against them.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xorkq9jX5k [67 minutes]

    Americans will be gratified to hear Justice Brandeis spoken of very favourably at one point.

    This one's got to be the worst example yet.

    Shopkeeper has been the victim of multiple robberies. Police have done nothing about it. In one case, he actually managed to detain the thief until the
    police arrived and the cops just took back the clothing the thief stole and then let thief go on his way.

    Frustrated by all of this, the shopkeeper put a sign in his front window reading, "Due to scumbags shoplifting, please ask for assistance to open
    locked cabinets."

    And the same police who couldn't be bothered arresting the thieves preying
    upon this man showed up instantly to order him to take down the sign because a thief might be offended to be called a scumbag.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ocfeNwf_M8&pp=0gcJCa0JAYcqIYzv

    Monty Python couldn't parody these people. No matter what they came up with, the police and the government would actually do it.

    This is the difference between the UK and the US. If a shopkeeper in L.A.-- frustrated with all the no-consequence thieving under our 'progressive' government-- hung up such a sign in his window, the cops wouldn't respond,
    even if people started complaining about it. And if by some chance, they did respond, they'd have no authority to tell the shopkeeper to take it down. The shopkeeper could just ask, "Is this a crime?" And when the inevitable answer came back, "no", the shopkeeper could just politely tell the cops to move
    along and leave him alone and they'd have no choice but to do so.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Wed Aug 13 22:24:16 2025
    On 8/13/2025 7:15 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Aug 12, 2025 at 1:25:17 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    In this episode of Triggernometry, Francis and Konstantin discuss the
    state of free speech in the UK with the head of the Free Speech Union
    and it's not a pretty picture. The statistics he gives at the end of the
    video are particularly concerning with roughly 30 Brits a day being
    arrested for free speech infringements and twice that number having
    Non-Crime Hate Incidents recorded against them.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xorkq9jX5k [67 minutes]

    Americans will be gratified to hear Justice Brandeis spoken of very
    favourably at one point.

    This one's got to be the worst example yet.

    Shopkeeper has been the victim of multiple robberies. Police have done nothing
    about it. In one case, he actually managed to detain the thief until the police arrived and the cops just took back the clothing the thief stole and then let thief go on his way.

    Frustrated by all of this, the shopkeeper put a sign in his front window reading, "Due to scumbags shoplifting, please ask for assistance to open locked cabinets."

    And the same police who couldn't be bothered arresting the thieves preying upon this man showed up instantly to order him to take down the sign because a
    thief might be offended to be called a scumbag.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ocfeNwf_M8&pp=0gcJCa0JAYcqIYzv

    Monty Python couldn't parody these people. No matter what they came up with, the police and the government would actually do it.

    This is the difference between the UK and the US. If a shopkeeper in L.A.-- frustrated with all the no-consequence thieving under our 'progressive' government-- hung up such a sign in his window, the cops wouldn't respond, even if people started complaining about it. And if by some chance, they did respond, they'd have no authority to tell the shopkeeper to take it down. The shopkeeper could just ask, "Is this a crime?" And when the inevitable answer came back, "no", the shopkeeper could just politely tell the cops to move along and leave him alone and they'd have no choice but to do so.

    What if, instead of 'scumbags', he'd said 'shoplifters'?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Thu Aug 14 03:00:02 2025
    On Aug 13, 2025 at 7:24:16 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 8/13/2025 7:15 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Aug 12, 2025 at 1:25:17 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> >> wrote:

    In this episode of Triggernometry, Francis and Konstantin discuss the
    state of free speech in the UK with the head of the Free Speech Union
    and it's not a pretty picture. The statistics he gives at the end of the >>> video are particularly concerning with roughly 30 Brits a day being
    arrested for free speech infringements and twice that number having
    Non-Crime Hate Incidents recorded against them.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xorkq9jX5k [67 minutes]

    Americans will be gratified to hear Justice Brandeis spoken of very
    favourably at one point.

    This one's got to be the worst example yet.

    Shopkeeper has been the victim of multiple robberies. Police have done
    nothing
    about it. In one case, he actually managed to detain the thief until the
    police arrived and the cops just took back the clothing the thief stole and >> then let thief go on his way.

    Frustrated by all of this, the shopkeeper put a sign in his front window
    reading, "Due to scumbags shoplifting, please ask for assistance to open
    locked cabinets."

    And the same police who couldn't be bothered arresting the thieves preying >> upon this man showed up instantly to order him to take down the sign
    because a
    thief might be offended to be called a scumbag.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ocfeNwf_M8&pp=0gcJCa0JAYcqIYzv

    Monty Python couldn't parody these people. No matter what they came up with,
    the police and the government would actually do it.

    This is the difference between the UK and the US. If a shopkeeper in L.A.-- >> frustrated with all the no-consequence thieving under our 'progressive'
    government-- hung up such a sign in his window, the cops wouldn't respond, >> even if people started complaining about it. And if by some chance, they did
    respond, they'd have no authority to tell the shopkeeper to take it down. >> The
    shopkeeper could just ask, "Is this a crime?" And when the inevitable answer
    came back, "no", the shopkeeper could just politely tell the cops to move >> along and leave him alone and they'd have no choice but to do so.

    What if, instead of 'scumbags', he'd said 'shoplifters'?

    That would be redundantly bad writing: "Due to shoplifters shoplifting, please ask for assistance to open
    locked cabinets."

    Kinda sounds silly.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Thu Aug 14 11:49:48 2025
    On 8/13/2025 11:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Aug 13, 2025 at 7:24:16 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 8/13/2025 7:15 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Aug 12, 2025 at 1:25:17 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com>
    wrote:

    In this episode of Triggernometry, Francis and Konstantin discuss the >>>> state of free speech in the UK with the head of the Free Speech Union >>>> and it's not a pretty picture. The statistics he gives at the end of the >>>> video are particularly concerning with roughly 30 Brits a day being
    arrested for free speech infringements and twice that number having
    Non-Crime Hate Incidents recorded against them.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xorkq9jX5k [67 minutes]

    Americans will be gratified to hear Justice Brandeis spoken of very
    favourably at one point.

    This one's got to be the worst example yet.

    Shopkeeper has been the victim of multiple robberies. Police have done >>> nothing
    about it. In one case, he actually managed to detain the thief until the >>> police arrived and the cops just took back the clothing the thief stole and
    then let thief go on his way.

    Frustrated by all of this, the shopkeeper put a sign in his front window >>> reading, "Due to scumbags shoplifting, please ask for assistance to open >>> locked cabinets."

    And the same police who couldn't be bothered arresting the thieves preying
    upon this man showed up instantly to order him to take down the sign
    because a
    thief might be offended to be called a scumbag.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ocfeNwf_M8&pp=0gcJCa0JAYcqIYzv

    Monty Python couldn't parody these people. No matter what they came up with,
    the police and the government would actually do it.

    This is the difference between the UK and the US. If a shopkeeper in L.A.--
    frustrated with all the no-consequence thieving under our 'progressive' >>> government-- hung up such a sign in his window, the cops wouldn't respond,
    even if people started complaining about it. And if by some chance, they did
    respond, they'd have no authority to tell the shopkeeper to take it down. >>> The
    shopkeeper could just ask, "Is this a crime?" And when the inevitable answer
    came back, "no", the shopkeeper could just politely tell the cops to move >>> along and leave him alone and they'd have no choice but to do so.

    What if, instead of 'scumbags', he'd said 'shoplifters'?

    That would be redundantly bad writing: "Due to shoplifters shoplifting, please
    ask for assistance to open
    locked cabinets."

    Kinda sounds silly.

    Rather than "redundantly bad". perhaps you mean "badly redundant".

    Meanwhile, why not take a swing at answering my question...




    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Thu Aug 14 16:52:08 2025
    On Aug 14, 2025 at 8:49:48 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 8/13/2025 11:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Aug 13, 2025 at 7:24:16 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>
    On 8/13/2025 7:15 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Aug 12, 2025 at 1:25:17 PM PDT, "Rhino"
    <no_offline_contact@example.com>
    wrote:

    In this episode of Triggernometry, Francis and Konstantin discuss the >>>>> state of free speech in the UK with the head of the Free Speech Union >>>>> and it's not a pretty picture. The statistics he gives at the end of the
    video are particularly concerning with roughly 30 Brits a day being >>>>> arrested for free speech infringements and twice that number having >>>>> Non-Crime Hate Incidents recorded against them.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xorkq9jX5k [67 minutes]

    Americans will be gratified to hear Justice Brandeis spoken of very >>>>> favourably at one point.

    This one's got to be the worst example yet.

    Shopkeeper has been the victim of multiple robberies. Police have done >>>> nothing
    about it. In one case, he actually managed to detain the thief until the
    police arrived and the cops just took back the clothing the thief stole >>>> and
    then let thief go on his way.

    Frustrated by all of this, the shopkeeper put a sign in his front window
    reading, "Due to scumbags shoplifting, please ask for assistance to open
    locked cabinets."

    And the same police who couldn't be bothered arresting the thieves preying
    upon this man showed up instantly to order him to take down the sign >>>> because a
    thief might be offended to be called a scumbag.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ocfeNwf_M8&pp=0gcJCa0JAYcqIYzv

    Monty Python couldn't parody these people. No matter what they came up >>>> with,
    the police and the government would actually do it.

    This is the difference between the UK and the US. If a shopkeeper in >>>> L.A.--
    frustrated with all the no-consequence thieving under our 'progressive' >>>> government-- hung up such a sign in his window, the cops wouldn't respond,
    even if people started complaining about it. And if by some chance, >>>> they did
    respond, they'd have no authority to tell the shopkeeper to take it down.
    The
    shopkeeper could just ask, "Is this a crime?" And when the inevitable >>>> answer
    came back, "no", the shopkeeper could just politely tell the cops to move
    along and leave him alone and they'd have no choice but to do so.

    What if, instead of 'scumbags', he'd said 'shoplifters'?

    That would be redundantly bad writing: "Due to shoplifters shoplifting,
    please
    ask for assistance to open
    locked cabinets."

    Kinda sounds silly.

    Rather than "redundantly bad". perhaps you mean "badly redundant".

    Either way.

    Meanwhile, why not take a swing at answering my question...

    I did. If the answer is not to your liking, perhaps ask your questions in a simple, direct way.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Thu Aug 14 15:10:01 2025
    On 8/14/2025 12:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Aug 14, 2025 at 8:49:48 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 8/13/2025 11:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Aug 13, 2025 at 7:24:16 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>
    On 8/13/2025 7:15 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Aug 12, 2025 at 1:25:17 PM PDT, "Rhino"
    <no_offline_contact@example.com>
    wrote:

    In this episode of Triggernometry, Francis and Konstantin discuss the
    state of free speech in the UK with the head of the Free Speech Union
    and it's not a pretty picture. The statistics he gives at the end of the
    video are particularly concerning with roughly 30 Brits a day being >>>>>> arrested for free speech infringements and twice that number having >>>>>> Non-Crime Hate Incidents recorded against them.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xorkq9jX5k [67 minutes]

    Americans will be gratified to hear Justice Brandeis spoken of very >>>>>> favourably at one point.

    This one's got to be the worst example yet.

    Shopkeeper has been the victim of multiple robberies. Police have done
    nothing
    about it. In one case, he actually managed to detain the thief until the
    police arrived and the cops just took back the clothing the thief stole
    and
    then let thief go on his way.

    Frustrated by all of this, the shopkeeper put a sign in his front window
    reading, "Due to scumbags shoplifting, please ask for assistance to open
    locked cabinets."

    And the same police who couldn't be bothered arresting the thieves preying
    upon this man showed up instantly to order him to take down the sign >>>>> because a
    thief might be offended to be called a scumbag.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ocfeNwf_M8&pp=0gcJCa0JAYcqIYzv

    Monty Python couldn't parody these people. No matter what they came up
    with,
    the police and the government would actually do it.

    This is the difference between the UK and the US. If a shopkeeper in >>>>> L.A.--
    frustrated with all the no-consequence thieving under our 'progressive'
    government-- hung up such a sign in his window, the cops wouldn't respond,
    even if people started complaining about it. And if by some chance, >>>>> they did
    respond, they'd have no authority to tell the shopkeeper to take it down.
    The
    shopkeeper could just ask, "Is this a crime?" And when the inevitable >>>>> answer
    came back, "no", the shopkeeper could just politely tell the cops to move
    along and leave him alone and they'd have no choice but to do so. >>>>
    What if, instead of 'scumbags', he'd said 'shoplifters'?

    That would be redundantly bad writing: "Due to shoplifters shoplifting, >>> please
    ask for assistance to open
    locked cabinets."

    Kinda sounds silly.

    Rather than "redundantly bad". perhaps you mean "badly redundant".

    Either way.

    Actually, no. One way means "severely bad", the other "bad twice".

    >> Meanwhile, why not take a swing at answering my question...

    I did. If the answer is not to your liking, perhaps ask your questions in a simple, direct way.

    The question was hardly complex ...almost rhetorical, even. Hint: it's
    the one you ducked in favor of a quasi spelling-flame.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to moviePig on Thu Aug 14 15:22:34 2025
    On 8/14/2025 3:10 PM, moviePig wrote:
    On 8/14/2025 12:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Aug 14, 2025 at 8:49:48 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 8/13/2025 11:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
      On Aug 13, 2025 at 7:24:16 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com>
    wrote:
      On 8/13/2025 7:15 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
        On Aug 12, 2025 at 1:25:17 PM PDT, "Rhino"
    <no_offline_contact@example.com>
        wrote:
        In this episode of Triggernometry, Francis and Konstantin >>>>>>> discuss the
        state of free speech in the UK with the head of the Free
    Speech Union
        and it's not a pretty picture. The statistics he gives at the >>>>>>> end of the
        video are particularly concerning with roughly 30 Brits a day >>>>>>> being
        arrested for free speech infringements and twice that number >>>>>>> having
        Non-Crime Hate Incidents recorded against them.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xorkq9jX5k [67 minutes]

        Americans will be gratified to hear Justice Brandeis spoken >>>>>>> of very
        favourably at one point.
        This one's got to be the worst example yet.
        Shopkeeper has been the victim of multiple robberies. Police >>>>>> have done
      nothing
        about it. In one case, he actually managed to detain the thief >>>>>> until the
        police arrived and the cops just took back the clothing the >>>>>> thief stole
    and
        then let thief go on his way.
        Frustrated by all of this, the shopkeeper put a sign in his >>>>>> front window
        reading, "Due to scumbags shoplifting, please ask for
    assistance to open
        locked cabinets."
        And the same police who couldn't be bothered arresting the
    thieves preying
        upon this man showed up instantly to order him to take down >>>>>> the sign
      because a
        thief might be offended to be called a scumbag.
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ocfeNwf_M8&pp=0gcJCa0JAYcqIYzv >>>>>>     Monty Python couldn't parody these people. No matter what they >>>>>> came up
    with,
        the police and the government would actually do it.
        This is the difference between the UK and the US. If a
    shopkeeper in
    L.A.--
        frustrated with all the no-consequence thieving under our
    'progressive'
        government-- hung up such a sign in his window, the cops
    wouldn't respond,
        even if people started complaining about it. And if by some >>>>>> chance,
    they did
        respond, they'd have no authority to tell the shopkeeper to >>>>>> take it down.
      The
        shopkeeper could just ask, "Is this a crime?" And when the
    inevitable
    answer
        came back, "no", the shopkeeper could just politely tell the >>>>>> cops to move
        along and leave him alone and they'd have no choice but to do so. >>>>>
      What if, instead of 'scumbags', he'd said 'shoplifters'?
      That would be redundantly bad writing: "Due to shoplifters
    shoplifting,
    please
      ask for assistance to open
        locked cabinets."
      Kinda sounds silly.

    Rather than "redundantly bad". perhaps you mean "badly redundant".

    Either way.

    Actually, no.  One way means "severely bad", the other "bad twice".

    Correction: "bad twice" vs. "severely redundant"...

    >  >> Meanwhile, why not take a swing at answering my question...

    I did. If the answer is not to your liking, perhaps ask your questions
    in a
    simple, direct way.

    The question was hardly complex ...almost rhetorical, even.  Hint: it's
    the one you ducked in favor of a quasi spelling-flame.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to moviePig on Thu Aug 14 19:30:54 2025
    On Aug 14, 2025 at 12:10:01 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 8/14/2025 12:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Aug 14, 2025 at 8:49:48 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>
    On 8/13/2025 11:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Aug 13, 2025 at 7:24:16 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 8/13/2025 7:15 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Aug 12, 2025 at 1:25:17 PM PDT, "Rhino"
    <no_offline_contact@example.com>
    wrote:

    In this episode of Triggernometry, Francis and Konstantin discuss the
    state of free speech in the UK with the head of the Free Speech Union
    and it's not a pretty picture. The statistics he gives at the end of the
    video are particularly concerning with roughly 30 Brits a day being
    arrested for free speech infringements and twice that number having
    Non-Crime Hate Incidents recorded against them.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xorkq9jX5k [67 minutes]

    Americans will be gratified to hear Justice Brandeis spoken of very
    favourably at one point.

    This one's got to be the worst example yet.

    Shopkeeper has been the victim of multiple robberies. Police have done
    nothing
    about it. In one case, he actually managed to detain the thief until the
    police arrived and the cops just took back the clothing the thief stole
    and
    then let thief go on his way.

    Frustrated by all of this, the shopkeeper put a sign in his front window
    reading, "Due to scumbags shoplifting, please ask for assistance to open
    locked cabinets."

    And the same police who couldn't be bothered arresting the thieves >>>>>> preying
    upon this man showed up instantly to order him to take down the sign
    because a
    thief might be offended to be called a scumbag.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ocfeNwf_M8&pp=0gcJCa0JAYcqIYzv >>>>>>
    Monty Python couldn't parody these people. No matter what they came up
    with,
    the police and the government would actually do it.

    This is the difference between the UK and the US. If a shopkeeper in
    L.A.--
    frustrated with all the no-consequence thieving under our 'progressive'
    government-- hung up such a sign in his window, the cops wouldn't >>>>>> respond,
    even if people started complaining about it. And if by some chance, >>>>>> they did
    respond, they'd have no authority to tell the shopkeeper to take it >>>>>> down.
    The
    shopkeeper could just ask, "Is this a crime?" And when the inevitable
    answer
    came back, "no", the shopkeeper could just politely tell the cops >>>>>> to move
    along and leave him alone and they'd have no choice but to do so. >>>>>
    What if, instead of 'scumbags', he'd said 'shoplifters'?

    That would be redundantly bad writing: "Due to shoplifters shoplifting, >>>> please ask for assistance to open locked cabinets."

    Kinda sounds silly.

    Rather than "redundantly bad". perhaps you mean "badly redundant".

    Either way.

    Actually, no. One way means "severely bad", the other "bad twice".

    >> Meanwhile, why not take a swing at answering my question...

    I did. If the answer is not to your liking, perhaps ask your questions in a >> simple, direct way.

    The question was hardly complex ...almost rhetorical, even. Hint: it's
    the one you ducked in favor of a quasi spelling-flame.

    And yet you still won't ask it directly.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From moviePig@21:1/5 to All on Thu Aug 14 17:36:36 2025
    On 8/14/2025 3:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Aug 14, 2025 at 12:10:01 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 8/14/2025 12:52 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Aug 14, 2025 at 8:49:48 AM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>
    On 8/13/2025 11:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Aug 13, 2025 at 7:24:16 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 8/13/2025 7:15 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Aug 12, 2025 at 1:25:17 PM PDT, "Rhino"
    <no_offline_contact@example.com>
    wrote:

    In this episode of Triggernometry, Francis and Konstantin discuss the
    state of free speech in the UK with the head of the Free Speech Union
    and it's not a pretty picture. The statistics he gives at the end of the
    video are particularly concerning with roughly 30 Brits a day being
    arrested for free speech infringements and twice that number having
    Non-Crime Hate Incidents recorded against them.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xorkq9jX5k [67 minutes] >>>>>>>>
    Americans will be gratified to hear Justice Brandeis spoken of very
    favourably at one point.

    This one's got to be the worst example yet.

    Shopkeeper has been the victim of multiple robberies. Police have done
    nothing
    about it. In one case, he actually managed to detain the thief until the
    police arrived and the cops just took back the clothing the thief stole
    and
    then let thief go on his way.

    Frustrated by all of this, the shopkeeper put a sign in his front window
    reading, "Due to scumbags shoplifting, please ask for assistance to open
    locked cabinets."

    And the same police who couldn't be bothered arresting the thieves
    preying
    upon this man showed up instantly to order him to take down the sign
    because a
    thief might be offended to be called a scumbag.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ocfeNwf_M8&pp=0gcJCa0JAYcqIYzv >>>>>>>
    Monty Python couldn't parody these people. No matter what they came up
    with,
    the police and the government would actually do it.

    This is the difference between the UK and the US. If a shopkeeper in
    L.A.--
    frustrated with all the no-consequence thieving under our 'progressive'
    government-- hung up such a sign in his window, the cops wouldn't >>>>>>> respond,
    even if people started complaining about it. And if by some chance,
    they did
    respond, they'd have no authority to tell the shopkeeper to take it
    down.
    The
    shopkeeper could just ask, "Is this a crime?" And when the inevitable
    answer
    came back, "no", the shopkeeper could just politely tell the cops >>>>>>> to move
    along and leave him alone and they'd have no choice but to do so. >>>>>>
    What if, instead of 'scumbags', he'd said 'shoplifters'?

    That would be redundantly bad writing: "Due to shoplifters shoplifting, >>>>> please ask for assistance to open locked cabinets."

    Kinda sounds silly.

    Rather than "redundantly bad". perhaps you mean "badly redundant".

    Either way.

    Actually, no. One way means "severely bad", the other "bad twice".

    >> Meanwhile, why not take a swing at answering my question...

    I did. If the answer is not to your liking, perhaps ask your questions in a
    simple, direct way.

    The question was hardly complex ...almost rhetorical, even. Hint: it's
    the one you ducked in favor of a quasi spelling-flame.

    And yet you still won't ask it directly.

    I did ask it directly. I welcomed any and all thoughts about a not-immediately-obvious darker component of the owner's behavior. Still
    do.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTR1701@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 18 17:41:00 2025
    On Aug 12, 2025 at 1:25:17 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    In this episode of Triggernometry, Francis and Konstantin discuss the
    state of free speech in the UK with the head of the Free Speech Union
    and it's not a pretty picture. The statistics he gives at the end of the video are particularly concerning with roughly 30 Brits a day being
    arrested for free speech infringements and twice that number having
    Non-Crime Hate Incidents recorded against them.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xorkq9jX5k [67 minutes]

    Americans will be gratified to hear Justice Brandeis spoken of very favourably at one point.

    As anyone with a brain might have predicted, the UK cops are now going beyond arresting people for 'hatred inciting' speech and locking people up merely for criticizing the government.

    Here we have a case where a retired firefighter was arrested and charged for criticizing his local fire department's policies. After being booked, questioned, and charged, he was originally only released on condition that he not only refrain from further criticism of the government, but was also forbidden from talking to anyone about having been arrested for it. He later provided a lawyer by a free speech advocacy group who managed to get those
    bail conditions lifted, but he still faces charges for daring to criticize the fire department.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cytxFu-mnU

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adam H. Kerman@21:1/5 to atropos@mac.com on Mon Aug 18 18:12:30 2025
    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

    . . .

    As anyone with a brain might have predicted, the UK cops are now going beyond >arresting people for 'hatred inciting' speech and locking people up merely for >criticizing the government.

    Here we have a case where a retired firefighter was arrested and charged
    for criticizing his local fire department's policies. After being booked, >questioned, and charged, he was originally only released on condition
    that he not only refrain from further criticism of the government, but
    was also forbidden from talking to anyone about having been arrested
    for it. He later provided a lawyer by a free speech advocacy group who >managed to get those bail conditions lifted, but he still faces charges
    for daring to criticize the fire department.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cytxFu-mnU

    Wow. He's a trade unionist and a Labor supporter, including of Starmer,
    which didn't prevent him from getting the Investigation of a Citizen
    Above Suspicion treatment as a favor to corrupt management of his
    regional fire department.

    Good on the Free Speech Union for getting him a barrister. The
    spokesbabe (gorgeous hair but I take points away for her eye makeup)
    poknted out that the retired fireman had criticized their leader in the
    past but they're helping him regain his liberty regardless.

    I have nothing snarky to offer. I'm too disgusted.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)