XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

Well? Wasn't it supposed to be the 'trial of the century' according to
the 'Blame America First' rightists?


Biden impeachment effort ‘eight months of abject failure’, watchdog report
says

Congressional Integrity Project reports on several inconsistencies and
untruths in James Comer’s House investigation
David Smith in Washington
@smithinamerica
Mon 11 Sep 2023 11.40 BST
Last modified on Mon 11 Sep 2023 17.40 BST

The man leading the Republican charge for an impeachment inquiry into Joe
Biden has spent “eight months of abject failure” in trying to prove the US president guilty of wrongdoing, a watchdog report says.

James Comer, the ambitious chairman of the House of Representatives’
oversight committee, has repeatedly overhyped allegations of bribery and corruption against Biden without once producing hard evidence, according to
the Congressional Integrity Project.
Kevin McCarthy speaks to reporters
Kevin McCarthy faces battle with hard-right Republicans as shutdown looms
Read more

The lack of a case underlines the huge political risks facing House
Republicans when they return to Capitol Hill on Tuesday. Some are
threatening to force a government shutdown unless an impeachment inquiry is opened despite objections from wary Republican colleagues in the Senate.

Comer has been leading an aggressive investigation into unsubstantiated
claims that Biden was involved in his son Hunter’s foreign business affairs during his time as vice-president. A CNN/SSRS poll this week found that 61%
of Americans believe that Biden did play such a role, including 42% who
think he acted illegally. But establishing the link between father and son
has proved an elusive holy grail.

“After months of political stunts, dozens of hearings, transcribed
interviews, and memos, and despite hours on Fox peddling conspiracy
theories, Comer and his Maga crew have failed to find a single shred of evidence linking President Biden to any of their lurid accusations,” says
the report by the Congressional Integrity Project, which monitors the Republican investigations. “In fact, Republicans have been forced to walk
back claim after claim.”

The report offers an anatomy of a fake scandal, detailing a series of exaggerated assertions that have shriveled under scrutiny. They include
Comer saying at his first press conference that he had evidence of “federal crimes committed”, relentlessly invoking “deep state” conspiracy theories
and claiming that his whistleblowers “fear for their lives”.

For months, the report says, Comer talked to the media about four
individuals he claimed were “whistleblowers”, a term increasingly hijacked
by the right. It adds: “Problem is – they weren’t whistleblowers and there
were only two people.”

Comer was eventually factchecked by his own colleague on the House
oversight committee. Democrat Jamie Raskin wrote to him: “The two
individuals your staff specifically identified as the individuals they understood to have been referenced during your March 6 Fox News interview,
are not whistleblowers … Your repeated statements about ‘four people’
suggest that either you have intentionally misrepresented the Committee’s investigative progress to your conservative audience or that key
investigative steps have been deliberately withheld from Committee
Democrats.”

In early May, Comer and Senator Chuck Grassley, investigating Hunter’s work
for the Ukrainian energy company Burisma, published an open letter to the
FBI announcing subpoenas for an unclassified document supposedly describing
an alleged “criminal scheme involving then-Vice-President Biden and a
foreign national relating to the exchange of money for policy decisions”.

But when Comer and Grassley obtained the document, form FD-1023, and
publicly released a redacted version – against the advice of intelligence officials who feared it would “unnecessarily risks the safety of a
confidential source” – it turned out to be an uncorroborated FBI tip.

“Worse still,” says the Congressional Integrity Project’s report, “the
owner of Ukrainian energy firm Burisma had already rebutted the
uncorroborated bribery allegations back in 2019.”

Also in May, Comer published a bank memo attacking Biden for his alleged foreign business ties but even the conservative Fox News network was unimpressed. Host Steve Doocy challenged Comer: “That’s just your
suggestion. You don’t actually have any facts to that point. You’ve got
some circumstantial evidence. And the other thing is, of all those names,
the one person who didn’t profit is that – there’s no evidence that Joe
Biden did anything illegally.”
Joe and Hunter Biden deplaning.
Joe Biden and his son Hunter have been accused of corruption by
Republicans, but a report says there is not much in way of proof.
Photograph: Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP/Getty Images

In June, during a series of interviews with rightwing media, Comer claimed
that the supposed bribery allegations against Biden have nothing to do with Rudy Giuliani, the former New York mayor turned lawyer for ex-president
Donald Trump.

The report points out: “The only problem with Comer’s vehement statements?
They are not true. Rudy Giuliani himself has taken credit for first raising
the allegations. Giuliani has said during several Newsmax TV appearances
that he alerted the justice department to the allegation.”

Also in June, Comer and Grassley began touting potential audio tapes
supposedly proving that Biden accepted a $5m bribe from a Ukrainian energy company during the Barack Obama administration. But Comer later admitted,
“We don’t know if they are legit or not,” during a Newsmax interview just
five days later.

In July, after weeks of hype from Comer about “bombshell testimony”, a
business associate of Hunter Biden named Devon Archer appeared before the
House oversight committee. But Archer failed to offer any evidence of a conflict of interest between Joe Biden and his son’s business ventures.
skip past newsletter promotion

Sign up to First Thing
Free daily newsletter

Our US morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters
Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain info about charities, online ads,
and content funded by outside parties. For more information see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google
Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

after newsletter promotion

Comer made much of a portion of testimony by Archer suggesting that Biden joined Hunter on speakerphone while talking with business associates up to
20 times. “The reality, however, was that Archer’s testimony referred to approximately 20 instances over the span of a decade in which Hunter
indicated Joe Biden was merely present; Archer did not testify that
President Biden was directly involved in business discussions beyond ‘the brand’ – only that he held casual conversations about ‘the weather’ and ‘fishing’.”

Comer himself was not even present for the testimony. One anonymous
Republican source was quoted as saying: “It was like following a general
into battle, but the general decided to stay home instead of fight.”

In early August, Comer released a memo that attacked Biden for supposedly receiving bribes from foreign countries. It was widely derided by
factcheckers. The Politico website reported: “But the memo, the third Comer
has released so far this year, also doesn’t show a direct payment to Joe Biden.”

The headline-grabbing pursuit of Biden has boosted Comer’s profile in the Republican party and proved beneficial in fundraising terms. He brought in
$1m in the first six months of 2023, including $400,000 in small-dollar donations, compared with just $15,000 from small-dollar donors in the whole
of 2021 and 2022.

News that prosecutors pursuing Hunter Biden on a gun possession charge
intend to seek a grand jury indictment by the end of September is likely to give fresh impetus to Republicans seeking an impeachment inquiry, even
though the case refers to his private conduct and is not connected to the president.

Such an inquiry could also backfire on far-right Republicans who are vowing
to shut down the government unless they get their way. No one is pushing
harder for it than Trump, who wrote on social media: “Either IMPEACH the
BUM, or fade into OBLIVION.”

Kyle Herrig, the Congressional Integrity Project’s executive director,
argues Trump’s myriad legal troubles are a motivating factor for Comer and allies ahead of next year’s presidential election.

“Let’s be clear why Republicans are doing this in the first place,” Herrig said. “Donald Trump has been indicted four times and they think using the machinations of government to conduct their partisan, stunt-filled investigations will convince the American people that Joe Biden is somehow



https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/11/biden-impeachment-inquiry- abject-failure-reportcorrupt like Trump.

“The problem is that facts are facts and we have the fact that Donald Trump
is corrupt and has likely committed numerous crimes. They don’t have a
single shred of evidence connecting Joe Biden to any wrongdoing.”

Comer’s office did not respond to a request for comment.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)