• Homo RICO: The Feds Need to Bust Big Gay

    From Ed Buck BAGGED & TAGGED Eric Garcet@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 24 04:00:43 2021
    XPost: la.general, alt.politics.media, alt.business
    XPost: dc.politics

    https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/01/09/17/8321528-6573905-image- a-6_1547055571738.jpg

    https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/01/09/17/8321230-6573905-image- m-12_1547055672514.jpg

    By Robert Oscar Lopez
    https://www.americanthinker.com/
    February 4, 2019

    Gay men Ed Buck and Terry Bean donated huge sums to Democrats
    and played leading roles in LGBT activism. Now they find
    themselves under scrutiny for misconduct with younger men. David
    Daniels and Scott Walters befriended Ruth Bader Ginsburg and
    inspired her to defend gay rights eloquently. Recently they have
    been accused of raping a young man in 2010.

    To add to the trend of famous gay Democrats in trouble, now
    Bryan Singer came under harsh scrutiny in the Atlantic over
    allegations of abuse. Together these men paint a horrifying
    picture. But they are far from the worst one finds in the gay
    community.

    Ed Buck's case deals with two black men, both younger, who died
    in his California home during some sort of drug-induced sex play.

    Terry Bean's case points to troubling congress with younger men,
    possibly including a minor.

    Bryan Singer's case involves lots of boys with Latino names.
    These point to a possible preference for younger, vulnerable
    Hispanic men. I wrote about the common occurrence of white men
    delighting in submissive Latino boys in the novels Johnson Park
    and Melville Affair. (Some details are reviewed in this post.) I
    endured years of this cultural dysfunction as a kid growing up
    in the LGBT community. I wrote those novels without realizing
    how shocking and nauseating they would feel to average viewers.

    Before I took them off the market a few people got a hold of
    both novels. Gay critics slammed them quickly as badly written
    and homophobic stereotypes (of course!). In November 2014, an
    undergraduate activist shouted me down after a presentation at
    Catholic University, alleging with his friends that I "wrote a
    book that claimed all gay men are pedophiles." Later I tried to
    approach Richard, one of the shouting undergraduates, to see
    what he was referring to. He held in his hand a profile on me by
    one of the usual gay websites that track "homophobes." Because I
    wrote fiction based on abuse of Latino boys by white men, which
    I saw in real life, I had been blacklisted as a homophobe.

    Ex-wives of gay men, ex-gays, and kids of gays know this
    routine. The gay community enables abuse. If you speak publicly
    about how the community harmed you, they double down on the
    abuse by destroying your career and reputation in the public
    square.

    When I compiled Jephthah's Daughters with sixteen other writers,
    we carefully assembled accounts of people who grew up with gay
    parents. We found similar stories of abuse that the children saw
    around them. Despite the rigged social-science research, what I
    found in interviews came across loud and clear: Having gay
    parents is difficult not because of external homophobia, but
    because the gay community's abusive habits filter into the home.

    What feels banal and unremarkable in the gay world outrages
    people with a mainstream American mindset. The gay community has
    known this for a long time. Gay leadership has worked
    deliberately to prevent the truth about its inner workings from
    reaching a broader audience.

    After decades silencing whistleblowers, gays face the terrifying
    prospect of losing their "untouchable" status. When the truth
    unfurls, the gay political movement will lose almost all its
    credibility because the whole community worked together to hide
    its abuse for so long.

    Why has it taken so long?

    I blogged countless times about the problem of abuse in the gay
    male community. For example, I mentioned Terry Bean in this 2015
    piece.

    I recorded a commentary about Ed Buck in 2017 after reading
    about the first black man found dead in his apartment, available
    here.

    Consider how many articles I wrote on American Thinker.

    On sexual abuse in the gay community: July 18, 2011; May 14,
    2012; November 1, 2012; December 4, 2012; December 24, 2012;
    February 9, 2013; July 6, 2013; August 9, 2013; December 22,
    2013; May 11, 2014; May 12, 2014; May 21, 2015; September 23,
    2015; October 15, 2017; November 27, 2017; September 6, 2018.

    On gay culture's racism: January 27, 2013; August 18, 2013;
    October 20, 2013; December 27, 2013; March 24, 2014; June 25,
    2014; July 2, 2014; September 29, 2014; May 1, 2015; November
    30, 2015; June 15, 2016; November 27, 2016; December 22, 2018.

    Ed Buck and Terry Bean did not act in a vacuum.

    The overwhelming majority of gay abusers benefit from a pro-gay
    press, judiciary, and academia that shield them from scrutiny.
    Decades of propaganda have made it taboo to notice abusive
    patterns among homosexuals. People internalize myths of gay
    innocence or stay quiet when they see disturbing things
    happening.

    But things change. Buck and Bean cannot hide from public outrage
    the way they used to. Years of conservative whistleblowing by ex-
    gay refugees like me, in combination with current MeToo
    obsessions, have changed the game forever.

    When informants called out problems in the gay community they
    were standing up to forces as massive as the Vatican. For how
    long have Catholic officials played the victim and cried "anti-
    Catholic" hatred?

    For how long did the Democrats protect Bill Clinton et al. by
    calling their critics right-wing prudes, fundamentalist wackos,
    anti-sex puritans, or closeted self-loathing homosexuals?

    When you do not want people to know bad things about your
    friends, you use guilt, threats, mind games, and whatever tricks
    you can come up with.

    People who lob charges like "bigotry" and "hate speech" are not
    overly zealous snowflakes or hypersensitive crybabies. This is
    where Ben Shapiro and his "facts don't care about your feelings"
    followers get everything wrong. We are not dealing with
    snowflakes. We are dealing with criminals devoid of any
    feelings. They silence criticism to preserve an elaborate racket
    of exploitation, fraud, and abuse.

    GLAAD, the Human Rights Campaign, the Southern Poverty Law
    Center, and Right Wing Watch knew exactly what they were doing
    when they smeared anyone criticizing homosexual abuse as
    homophobes.

    When Claire Potter rushed to discredit my abuse history in the
    comments section of Inside Higher Education in 2015, she was not
    a marginal nobody in the gay community. She was a well-known
    lesbian historian who had run a public blog in the Chronicle of
    Higher Education. The people at Inside Higher Ed obviously
    sympathized with her. Moderators deleted all my comments
    responding to her.

    Through her blog Potter drew me into her conversational circles.
    Using information she got from my engagement on her public
    Chronicle forum, she wrote to California State University
    Northridge and compounded my problems there. These are not
    casual frictions. They are premeditated moves.

    Gay organizations -- indeed, the entire gay community's
    leadership -- need to be subject to federal investigation under
    RICO. I am 100% serious. Not only do FBI statistics reveal a
    harrowing percentage of boys who get molested by men while
    underage. Also, untold numbers of people have lost their jobs,
    livelihoods, and reputations due to the smears that the
    community's cover-up necessitated.

    At this point the research cannot be trusted. The encroachment
    by LGBT activists into children's education and entertainment
    poses a massive risk we cannot afford to accept blindly.

    People on both left and right have overlooked the reality of gay
    abuse because, if I analyze this charitably, the essence of the
    gay community has remained hidden.

    I would explain it this way. You cannot discuss education
    effectively if you have never set foot in a school. You cannot
    discuss religion effectively if you have never set foot in a
    place of worship. And you cannot discuss homosexuality
    effectively if you have never set foot in a bathhouse.

    I have gone into bathhouses and worked in them, both as a
    housekeeper and as a less illustrious type of worker. Inside the
    bathhouse affairs are not random or scattered. Gay tastes are
    not individual expressions of personal rights. Gays form a
    network, an organized coterie, with its own hierarchies,
    economies, and rituals. Gayness is collective; it "exists" not
    because gay individuals exist but because a milieu exists to
    connect one man to scores of other men. To get sex, gays must
    enter the gay spaces and expose themselves, which means they
    become beholden to gays who can blackmail or stalk them.

    In the bathhouse, the only hedge against danger is to join in
    the nudity. If you have sex in a semi-public place you find more
    safety then if you bring a man to somewhere secluded where he
    may overwhelm you physically. The economy of the bathhouse is
    heartless. Fat men must be rich and pay for a larger room if
    they hold any hope of having sex with a young fit man. Whites
    have more power. Men of color often appear available because
    they exchange sex for money or some other way to stay alive. The
    bathhouse inducts you into the map of the whole city. You know
    who's gay in each church, company, neighborhood, and ethnic
    enclave.

    Don't let lesbians say this is only the male side of things.
    Lesbians yoked their case to gay men long ago and have helped
    gays cover up abuse for a long time.

    Many will protest that we cannot generalize from the bathhouse.
    But we can, since that is the place where homosexuality exists
    most honestly.

    One thing unites everyone in the bathhouse: the need to keep
    everything secret. In other words, shame. You will not find
    love, support, or redemption there. You will find homosexuality
    in all its harmful brutality, as I explain here. Society will
    likely react to the news of gay sex abuse by trying to isolate
    the abusive practices from a mythically non-abusive and healthy
    homosexuality. But there is no there there. As you learn in the
    bathhouse, homosexuality consists of a preoccupation with
    genitals. Unfortunately, while they are preoccupied with
    genitals, theirs cannot match the type of activity everyone in
    the community wants to pursue. This paradox breeds misery. To
    the extent that homosexuals seek to normalize and naturalize
    their paradox, particularly to young people, the misery leads to
    a system of abuse and cover-ups.

    Contact your senator now and send a clear message. "Big Gay" is
    not a homophobic myth. The abuse has thrived because of an
    organized system crushing whistleblowers and enabling
    exploitation. Government should not involve itself in everything
    but it should protect us from this kind of racketeering,
    influencing, and corrupt organizations. We need a Homo RICO now.

    Robert Oscar Lopez writes at English Manif.

    https://virtueonline.org/homo-rico-feds-need-bust-big-gay

    TAGS: Barack Obama Homosexual Degenerate Gay Pedophile Democrat
    Liberalism Pervert CNN CBS ABC NBC Disney MSNBC Faggots Hillary
    Clinton Racist Queer Progressive Antifa Faggots Nancy Pelosi
     

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)