XPost: alt.arts.poetry.comments

On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 0:31:59 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:

On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:49:46 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 21:16:31 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:

Jim Senetto sent $50 to Zod, NOT me.

I was sent the money to give to Zod, which I did.

Senetto mailed it to me and I handed it to Zod, who spent the money as
he pleased, as was his right.

Again , I was sent the money to give to Zod, which I did.

Glad to clear the confusion up about that matter, which happened almost
a decade ago.

You can't write two consecutive sentences without contradicting

The story isn't really that complicated, Pendragon, and I told it
exactly as it happened.

The question is one of whether you actually gave it to Stinky Zid.

In the copy of the email you'd posted to show Jim that... hell, I can't
figure out what it was supposed to be showing him... your told Stinky
that Jim's money arrived and invited him out for steak dinner.

And, of course, either that night or the following one, you made you
made that famous post about how you and Brother Dave had been attacked
by a "maniac" with a metal rod.

The "maniac" turned out to be Stinky George, who'd waylaid you both
outdoors.

You've been buddies with Stinky for... what?... thirty or forty years?

Stinky had never attacked you and Dave with a metal rod before. And,
AFAIK, he hasn't attacked you since.

You claimed that Stinky was just "blackout drunk" and that it was only
the booze that brought on the attack. But you've never breathed a work
about any other "blackout drunk" attacks by his Stinkiness.

Could it have been that Stinky George was unaware that the $50 had been
for him?

I know that if I were about to be thrown out on the street, and someone
had sent my friend $50 to tide my landlord over until a check I was
expecting arrived, I'd be pretty darned angry if I found out that my
friend blew that money on a steak dinner for three.

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.arts.poetry.comments

On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 1:54:38 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:

On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 1:32:00 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 0:31:59 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:

On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:49:46 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 21:16:31 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:

Jim Senetto sent $50 to Zod, NOT me.

I was sent the money to give to Zod, which I did.

Senetto mailed it to me and I handed it to Zod, who spent the money as >>>>> he pleased, as was his right.

Again , I was sent the money to give to Zod, which I did.

Glad to clear the confusion up about that matter, which happened almost >>>>> a decade ago.

You can't write two consecutive sentences without contradicting

The story isn't really that complicated, Pendragon, and I told it
exactly as it happened.

The question is one of whether you actually gave it to [childish name
calling snipped]

Yes, I gave Zod the $50 immediately.

In the copy of the email you'd posted to show Jim that... hell, I can't
figure out what it was supposed to be showing him... your told
[Zod][childish name calling snipped]
that Jim's money arrived

Yes, Senetto sent the money to my address, I don't remember why

Because he asked you where he should send it, and you gave him your
address.

and invited him out for steak dinner.

No, going out to eat was Zod's idea, and so we went to the steakhouse.

That's been well known from day one.

No, Donkey, it hasn't.

You first posted a message to Jim, in which you told him that his money
had been spend on a good cause -- steak dinner for three.

When Jim told you that the money had been meant for Stinky Zod (not for
you and your brother), you sent him an email which he reposted.

In the email you describe how you called Stinky George and said "I just
got Jim's money. What do say about going out for steak" (paraphrased
from memory).

Here's what has actually been clear from the first:

1) You posted Stinky George's sob story to the group, and wondered aloud
about what poor Stinky G could do. You went on to explain how Stinky
George was still recovering from his accident and unable to work. You
further told us that he had applied for, and been approved to receive, assistance from the VA, and that a check was being processed for him.
He just needed something to tide his landlord over until the VA check
arrived. There is no reason to believe that Stinky George was aware of
your attempt to solicit monetary aid on his behalf.
2) Jim offered to send money, and asked you for a mailing address.
3) You gave Jim *your* address.
4) Jim posted that the money had been mailed and was on its way.
5) You then preemptively covered your ass, by telling Jim that you
wouldn't have given Stinky G any money because he'll only spend it on
booze, weed, and whores.
6) Jim asked you to give the money directly to Stinky's landlord.
7) You immediately nixed that idea (without first consulting the
landlord) on the grounds that Stinky had stiffed him out of several
months' rent and had already given Stinky an eviction notice. This runs directly counter to the original sob story/solicitation you'd posted
here.
8) Jim then asked you to be responsible for the money and to see that it
was spend on supplies that a homeless Stinky G would need for survival
(a tent, blankets, sleeping bag, non-perishable foodstuffs, etc.).
9) You sent Jim a post in which informed him that his money had been
spend on a good cause -- steak dinner for three.
10) You later sent him an email in which you described how you called
Stinky when the check arrived, and suggested going out for steak.

It's clear to this observer that you orchestrated the entire scam
without Stinky George's knowledge. When the money arrived you took
Stinky and Dave out to dinner.

When Stinky found out what you'd done, he attacked you and Dave with a
metal rod.

And, of course, either that night or the following one,

I'm not sure the events happened that close to each other but it was in
the same general time period, Fall 2015.

you made you
made that famous post about how you and Brother Dave had been attacked

Not a very good night, no.

by a "maniac" with a metal rod.

I don't remember the timeline now, 2015 was, after all, a decade ago.

The "maniac" turned out to be [Zod] [childish name calling snipped]
who'd waylaid you both
outdoors.

You've been buddies with for... what?... thirty or forty years?

I've known Zod and his family since 1983.

had never attacked you and Dave with a metal rod before.

No, but Zod was pretty wild that night.

AFAIK, he hasn't attacked you since.

You claimed that [childish name calling snipped] was just "blackout
drunk"

Yes, Zod was acting pretty crazy that night.

and that it was only
the booze that brought on the attack.

Yes, Zod was drinking a lot during that period of time.

But you've never breathed a work

A work?

about any other "blackout drunk" attacks

Could it have been that [Zod] was unaware that the $50 had been
for him?

No, I gave him the $50 immediately when it arrived in the mail.

I know that if I were about to be thrown out on the street,

It's easy to sit back and say what you'd do in another man's shoes, but
in the end you're simply daydreaming.

and someone

had sent my friend $50 to tide my landlord over until a check I was
expecting arrived

By the time Zod got the $50 the landlord had already served eviction
papers and all that.

I remember Zod saying the landlord either wanted the full amount owed or
Zod would have to go.

Senetto sent Zod the money and Zod spent it as he pleased, as was his
right, of course.

HTH and HAND.

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.arts.poetry.comments

On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 19:04:58 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:

On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 18:39:24 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 1:54:38 +0000, Will Dockery wrote:

On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 1:32:00 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 0:31:59 +0000, Will Dockery wrote:

On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:49:46 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 21:16:31 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:

Jim Senetto sent $50 to Zod, NOT me.

I was sent the money to give to Zod, which I did.

Senetto mailed it to me and I handed it to Zod, who spent the money as >>>>>>> he pleased, as was his right.

Again , I was sent the money to give to Zod, which I did.

Glad to clear the confusion up about that matter, which happened almost >>>>>>> a decade ago.

You can't write two consecutive sentences without contradicting

The story isn't really that complicated, Pendragon, and I told it
exactly as it happened.

The question is one of whether you actually gave it to [childish name
calling snipped]

Yes, I gave Zod the $50 immediately.

In the copy of the email you'd posted to show Jim that... hell, I can't >>>> figure out what it was supposed to be showing him... your told
[Zod][childish name calling snipped]
that Jim's money arrived

Yes, Senetto sent the money to my address, I don't remember why

Because he asked you where he should send it, and you gave him your
address.

and invited him out for steak dinner.

No, going out to eat was Zod's idea, and so we went to the steakhouse.

That's been well known from day one.

No, it hasn't.

Yes, it has.

<Lies and misrepresentations snipped, to be corrected later.>

LOL! Donkey made the bad old truth go away... NOT!

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.arts.poetry.comments

On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 21:25:04 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:

On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 19:48:33 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 19:04:58 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:

On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 18:39:24 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 1:54:38 +0000, Will Dockery wrote:

On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 1:32:00 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 0:31:59 +0000, Will Dockery wrote:

On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:49:46 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 21:16:31 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:

Jim Senetto sent $50 to Zod, NOT me.

I was sent the money to give to Zod, which I did.

Senetto mailed it to me and I handed it to Zod, who spent the money as
he pleased, as was his right.

Again , I was sent the money to give to Zod, which I did.

Glad to clear the confusion up about that matter, which happened almost
a decade ago.

You can't write two consecutive sentences without contradicting >>>>>>>

The story isn't really that complicated, Pendragon, and I told it >>>>>>> exactly as it happened.

The question is one of whether you actually gave it to [childish name >>>>>> calling snipped]

Yes, I gave Zod the $50 immediately.

In the copy of the email you'd posted to show Jim that... hell, I can't >>>>>> figure out what it was supposed to be showing him... your told
[Zod][childish name calling snipped]
that Jim's money arrived

Yes, Senetto sent the money to my address, I don't remember why

Because he asked you where he should send it, and you gave him your
address.

and invited him out for steak dinner.

No, going out to eat was Zod's idea, and so we went to the steakhouse. >>>>>
That's been well known from day one.

No, it hasn't.

Yes, it has.

<Lies and misrepresentations snipped, to be corrected later.>

LOL!

The truth is Jim Senetto sent Zod $50 which Zod spent as he pleased,
which was his right after the $$$ was given to him.

Lie! Jim sent the money to *you* -- as *you* had instructed him to do.

The $50 was later given back to Jim Senetto, in fact he was repayed over $100.

Lie! The money was never given back to Jim. You supposedly gave $50 to
your daughter (which you attempted to prove by posting a photo of the *unchashed* check). You later gave $50 to Cujo as a donation to an
animal shelter.

And so it goes.

Yep... one lie after another.

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.arts.poetry.comments

On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 23:09:24 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:

On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 21:30:43 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 21:25:04 +0000, Will Dockery wrote:

On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 19:48:33 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 19:04:58 +0000, Will Dockery wrote:

On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 1:32:00 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

Will Dockery wrote:

On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:49:46 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

Will Dockery wrote:

Jim Senetto sent $50 to Zod, NOT me.

I was sent the money to give to Zod, which I did.

Senetto mailed it to me and I handed it to Zod, who spent the money as
he pleased, as was his right.

Again , I was sent the money to give to Zod, which I did.

Glad to clear the confusion up about that matter, which happened almost
a decade ago.

You can't write two consecutive sentences without contradicting >>>>>>>>>

The story isn't really that complicated, Pendragon, and I told it >>>>>>>>> exactly as it happened.

The question is one of whether you actually gave it to [childish name >>>>>>>> calling snipped]

Yes, I gave Zod the $50 immediately.

In the copy of the email you'd posted to show Jim that... hell, I can't
figure out what it was supposed to be showing him... your told >>>>>>>> [Zod][childish name calling snipped]
that Jim's money arrived

Yes, Senetto sent the money to my address, I don't remember why

Because he asked you where he should send it, and you gave him your >>>>>> address.

and invited him out for steak dinner.

No, going out to eat was Zod's idea, and so we went to the steakhouse. >>>>>>>
That's been well known from day one.

No, it hasn't.

Yes, it has.

<Lies and misrepresentations snipped, to be corrected later.>

LOL!

The truth is Jim Senetto sent Zod $50 which Zod spent as he pleased,
which was his right after the $$$ was given to him.

Lie! Jim sent the money to *you* -- as *you* had instructed him to do.

The $50 was later given back to Jim Senetto, in fact he was repayed over >>> $100.

The money was never given back to Jim

The money was sent where Jim Senetto instructed me to send it.

TWICE.

Do you understand the difference between the money "was given back to
Jim Senetto" and the money "was sent where Jim Senetto instructed me to
send it?"

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.arts.poetry.comments

On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 16:22:11 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:

On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 21:30:43 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 21:25:04 +0000, Will Dockery wrote:

On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 19:48:33 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

On Sat, 15 Feb 2025 19:04:58 +0000, Will Dockery wrote:

On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 18:39:24 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 1:54:38 +0000, Will Dockery wrote:

Jim Senetto sent $50 to Zod, NOT me.

I was sent the money to give to Zod, which I did.

And which Zod spent as he pleased.

Senetto mailed it to me and I handed it to Zod, who spent the money as
he pleased, as was his right.

Again , I was sent the money to give to Zod, which I did.

Glad to clear the confusion up about that matter, which happened almost
a decade ago.

You can't write two consecutive sentences without contradicting >>>>>>>>>

The story isn't really that complicated, Pendragon, and I told it >>>>>>>>> exactly as it happened.

The question is one of whether you actually gave it to [childish name >>>>>>>> calling snipped]

Yes, I gave Zod the $50 immediately.

In the copy of the email you'd posted to show Jim that... hell, I can't
figure out what it was supposed to be showing him... your told >>>>>>>> [Zod][childish name calling snipped]
that Jim's money arrived

Yes, Senetto sent the money to my address, I don't remember why

Because he asked you where he should send it, and you gave him your >>>>>> address.

and invited him out for steak dinner.

No, going out to eat was Zod's idea, and so we went to the steakhouse. >>>>>>>
That's been well known from day one.

No, it hasn't.

Yes, it has.

<Lies and misrepresentations snipped, to be corrected later.>

LOL!

The truth is Jim Senetto sent Zod $50 which Zod spent as he pleased,
which was his right after the $$$ was given to him.

Lie! Jim sent the money to *you* -- as *you* had instructed him to do.

The $50 was later given back to Jim Senetto, in fact he was repayed over >>> $100.

Lie!

That's absolute bullshit, Pendragon.

Every word I've posted here is the truth and most of it can be easily verified.

You didn't give it back to Jim. You sent it to others at Jim's
instructions.

There's a very big difference between the two.

The money was never given back to Jim.

The $100 was sent where Jim Senetto instructed me to send it so it was actually given back to him, or given where Senetto wanted it to be

No, Donkey, it wasn't given back to him.

Learn how to speak English already!

You supposedly gave $50 to
your daughter

Yes, I gave her $50 which I didn't mind doing either way.

What were her two available options? Or do I not want to know?

(which you attempted to prove

More than attempted, I did prove it.

No, Donkey. You only proved that you'd written out a check to your
daughter.

There was no proof that she cashed it. And, even if she had cashed it,
there was no proof that the money didn't go straight back into your
pocket.

by posting a photo of the
*unchashed* check).

It was made out to her name.

I still have that photo with witnesses on Google Photos if you'd like to
see it.

I can write out a check for a billion dollars, take a photo of it, and
claim I'd paid out that much money. But as long as the check hasn't
been cashed, there's no reason to believe that I ever possessed that sum
of money.

You later gave $50 to Cujo as a donation to an
animal shelter.

This was also following the instructions of Jim Senetto.

This made a total of $100 to pay back the original $50.

And so it goes.

The $100 was sent to where Jim Senetto instructed me to send it, so I consider Jim Senetto fully refunded... TWICE.

Wrong again, illiterate Donkey.

Jim was not refunded. Jim was not repaid. Jim was not reimbursed. Jim
was not given back the money.

Learn how to speak English correctly, or STFU.

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.arts.poetry.comments

On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 18:40:04 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:

HarryLime wrote:

Will Dockery wrote:

HarryLime wrote:

Will Dockery wrote:

HarryLime wrote:

Will Dockery wrote:

Jim Senetto sent $50 to Zod, NOT me.
I was sent the money to give to Zod, which I did.

Senetto mailed it to me and I handed it to Zod, who spent the money as
he pleased, as was his right.
Again , I was sent the money to give to Zod, which I did.

Glad to clear the confusion up about that matter, which happened almost
a decade ago.

The story isn't really that complicated, Pendragon, and I told it >>>>>>>>> exactly as it happened.

I gave Zod the $50 immediately.
Senetto sent the money to my address.
Going out to eat was Zod's idea, and so we went to the steakhouse. >>>>>>>>>
That's been well known from day one.

<Lies and misrepresentations snipped, to be corrected later.>

The truth is Jim Senetto sent Zod $50 which Zod spent as he pleased, >>>>> which was his right after the $$$ was given to him.

The $50 was later given back to Jim Senetto, in fact he was repaied over >>>>> $100 sent to where Jim Senetto instructed me to send the money.

The money was sent where Jim Senetto instructed me to send it.

TWICE.

Which amounts to over $100 for the original $50.

Jim Senetto was reimbursed double, and according to Jim Senetto's instructions.

Do you understand the difference between the money "was given back to
Jim Senetto" and the money "was sent where Jim Senetto instructed me to
send it?"

--

I understand that that's what Jim Senetto wanted done and so that's what
I did.

I would have much rather sent the money straight back to him and be done
with the matter.

And so it goes.

What you would have preferred to have done is not the point, Donkey.

The point is that you're claiming to have "given back" the money to Jim,
which is *not* what happened.

You keep prattling on about "setting the record straight" and
"correcting lies and misrepresentations," yet you insist on creating
your own lies and misrepresentations through your gross misuse of the
English language.

When you say that you gave Jim back the money, you are *literally*
saying that you placed the money in his hand, pocket, or bank account.

Jim never saw, touched, or in any way had access to, that money again,
so he never *got it back.*

Words matter.

We've been over this countless times before, but it seems that you've forgotten.

What happened was that you *settled your debt* with Jim, per his
instructions, and to his satisfaction.

You did not, however, return the money to him.

When you insist that you *gave Jim the money,* you are creating a false
record of what actually happened. Stop it.

If you want to set the record straight, say that your debt was settled
to Jim's satisfaction. Or say that you eventually gave a total of $100
to others at Jim's instruction. But don't say that you gave Jim back
the money, because that never happened.

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)