XPost: alt.arts.poetry.comments, alt.arts.poetry
On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 15:22:36 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 15:15:05 +0000, Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
George J. Dance@novabbs.com (George J. Dance) wrote in
news:cd65deba2adb21d5c3f3ff703ed83be3@www.novabbs.com:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 14:21:19 +0000, Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
will.dockery@gmail.com (W.Dockery) wrote in
news:000911929bf9f11f63f6ab81e7110b77@www.novabbs.com:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 3:45:48 +0000, Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
will.dockery@gmail.com (W.Dockery) wrote in
news:7949bdc196023528330c57c38df99106@www.novabbs.com:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 0:16:00 +0000, Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:
nancygene.andjayme@gmail.com (NancyGene) wrote in
news:eae387fde80a7a0298f47c4ee094fda8@www.novabbs.com:
Does giving George Dance a virtual pants-pulled-down count?
Sort of a reverse wedgie. Actually, George may have a
conditioned response ("feeling a spanking") every time he pulls >>>>>>>>> down his own pants. That's a huge psychological burden.
Only a masochist would de-pants Dunce. Even Dunce himself has to >>>>>>>> do it every once in a while.
If you're going to argue that Dunce is doubling down. Well, in >>>>>>>> that case you might be righter than you've ever been.
Obsessively troll much, Cujo?
I popped in to add an observation
Great, feel free to pop back out again, Cujo.
And you added nothing again! How it must suck to be a loser like you!
Gee, another snipping frenzy. Look what you left out!
, Dreckweasel. What did you have to add? Screed about how you
project your obsessive trolling upon others was pretty much it. It >>>>>> must suck to be a one trick douchebag like you.
Cowardly snipping and no response noted and ridiculed.
The Power of the FAIL has not deserted you.
I'm thinking I'll stick around to laugh at you instead, fuckchop.
Good morning, Cuckoo. Since you're posting in the thread about
"Penny's Blog," do you have anything to say (on-topic) about that
poem; or are you just here to troll Will?
I think it's funny that you never call out Dreckster for sailing off-
topic. Your alleged topic had long ago been derailed before it even left
the station. You might want to ask a certain entity known as "Little
Willie Douchebag" about why that happened. His hands look even more
filthier than usual.
We all can read the backthread and see why that happened. Your online
friends HarryLiar and NastyGoon had nothing to say on the poem, so
decided to troll me instead. No one is blaming you for the trainwreck,
Cujo; I was merely asking you if you'd like to help get that train back
onto the track. I read your reply as a "No", so that's done.
Your poem had been discussed frontwards, backwards, and inside out the
first time you posted it, George.
It was a terrible poem then (quite possibly your worst), and it's a
terrible poem now. The sing-song style contrasts (in a bad way) with
the serious subject matter. The "tour" through the childhood house is
both superficial and trite. The narrator's desire to burn the house
down trivializes it even further (and the basic concept that a man under psychiatric care would have been allowed to revisit his childhood house
-- now occupied by others -- is ridiculous).
The poem is a train wreck from the get-go. I should think you'd be
embarrassed to repost it, as you're capable of much better work.
Do you have any Douchebags to discuss?
No. My interest is in discussing poetry, especially mine (as an
unrepentant egoist), not other people. I just wanted to know if you were willing to be part of the solution, or if you wanted to stay part of the problem. I got my answer, so we're done.
--
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)