NO ONE
by George Dance
(in the style of George Dance)
No one
accused you of
plagiarism,
you
silly
cunt.
Please stop
repeating your
online friend's
lie.
--
NO ONE
by George Dance
(in the style of George Dance)
No one
accused you of
plagiarism,
you
silly
cunt.
Please stop
repeating your
online friend's
lie.
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:56:39 +0000, HarryLime wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:We see that George Dance has really touched his poetic core with this
NO ONE
by George Dance
(in the style of George Dance)
No one
accused you of
plagiarism,
you
silly
cunt.
Please stop
repeating your
online friend's
lie.
--
Damn, George!
That's so good that it's got me sorry that I banned you from AAPC.
piece. Note the strong anal retentiveness in the threat words,
influenced by a personal intrarectalcranialitis.
"You've got a friend."
--
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:
NO ONE
by George Dance
(in the style of George Dance)
No one
accused you of
plagiarism,
you
silly
cunt.
Please stop
repeating your
online friend's
lie.
--
Damn, George!
That's so good that it's got me sorry that I banned you from AAPC.
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:56:39 +0000, Michael Monkey aka "HarryLime" wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:
NO ONE
by George Dance
(in the style of George Dance)
No one
accused you of
plagiarism,
you
silly
cunt.
Please stop
repeating your
online friend's
lie.
--
Damn, George!
That's so good that it's got me sorry that I banned you from AAPC.
You banned me from aapc? Oh dear, whatever shall I do?
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 10:21:30 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:
NO ONE
by George Dance
(in the style of George Dance)
No one
accused you of
plagiarism,
you
silly
cunt.
Please stop
repeating your
online friend's
lie.
That's an interesting found poem, NastyGoon. I can't say that the style
you adopted does anything for it, but the content is well worth
expressing.
It seems to show a Michael Ehrhart influence.
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:30:12 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:56:39 +0000, Michael Monkey aka "HarryLime" wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:
NO ONEDamn, George!
by George Dance
(in the style of George Dance)
No one
accused you of
plagiarism,
you
silly
cunt.
Please stop
repeating your
online friend's
lie.
That's so good that it's got me sorry that I banned you from AAPC.
You banned me from aapc? Oh dear, whatever shall I do?
Continue whining about it on the Usenet version, I suppose.
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 12:50:17 +0000, HarryLime wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:30:12 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:So you think I should continue to post on aapc about your claim to have banned me from aapc? All righty, let's do so.
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:56:39 +0000, Michael Monkey aka "HarryLime" wrote: >>>
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:
NO ONEDamn, George!
by George Dance
(in the style of George Dance)
No one
accused you of
plagiarism,
you
silly
cunt.
Please stop
repeating your
online friend's
lie.
That's so good that it's got me sorry that I banned you from AAPC.
You banned me from aapc? Oh dear, whatever shall I do?
Continue whining about it on the Usenet version, I suppose.
(1) Obviously you did not ban me from posting to aapc (which is a Usenet group) or any of its web portals (despite your efforts to get me banned
from NovaBBS) since I am still posting to it. So I can't "whine" here
about being banned from it.
You did make a show of banning me from your Facebook group (which you
were calling the "Usenet version" of AYOS" at the time, but you're now calling "the Facebook version of aapc"); but I wasn't posting from there
at the time, and of course I still don't post there. So I can't "whine"
there about it either.
So which do you suggest I do? "Whine" about being banned by you from a
group I'm not banned from, or "whine" about being banned by you from a
group I wasn't posting to?
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 21:48:38 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 10:21:30 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:It certainly does; I'd even say that it looks very mush like the edit of "Shattered" by Mr. Ehrhart that I rew-edited and posted in that thread.
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:
NO ONE
by George Dance
(in the style of George Dance)
No one
accused you of
plagiarism,
you
silly
cunt.
Please stop
repeating your
online friend's
lie.
That's an interesting found poem, NastyGoon. I can't say that the style
you adopted does anything for it, but the content is well worth
expressing.
It seems to show a Michael Ehrhart influence.
OTOH, I can't remember any of my own poems that I've published here, on
my blog, or in any of my books that look like that. So I do have to
wonder where NastyGoon got the idea that this form was my "style".
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 18:34:07 +0000, HarryLime wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 9:39:55 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 21:48:38 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 10:21:30 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:It certainly does; I'd even say that it looks very mush like the edit of >>> "Shattered" by Mr. Ehrhart that I rew-edited and posted in that thread.
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:
NO ONE
by George Dance
(in the style of George Dance)
No one
accused you of
plagiarism,
you
silly
cunt.
Please stop
repeating your
online friend's
lie.
That's an interesting found poem, NastyGoon. I can't say that the style >>>>> you adopted does anything for it, but the content is well worth
expressing..
It seems to show a Michael Ehrhart influence.
OTOH, I can't remember any of my own poems that I've published here, on
my blog, or in any of my books that look like that. So I do have to
wonder where NastyGoon got the idea that this form was my "style".
It is in your style, because it is made up entirely of your words.
It may not be in the same style as your poetry, but it is in your real,
unfiltered, unadorned, up close and personal style.
I don't think George Dance has denied actually writing the words used,
but presenting them as a poem is false, a misrepresentation.
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 21:28:41 +0000, HarryLime wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 20:48:38 +0000, Wikl Dockery wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 18:34:07 +0000, HarryLime wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 9:39:55 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 21:48:38 +0000, Will Dockery wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 10:21:30 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:It certainly does; I'd even say that it looks very mush like the edit of >>>>> "Shattered" by Mr. Ehrhart that I rew-edited and posted in that thread. >>>>> OTOH, I can't remember any of my own poems that I've published here, on >>>>> my blog, or in any of my books that look like that. So I do have to
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:
NO ONE
by George Dance
(in the style of George Dance)
No one
accused you of
plagiarism,
you
silly
cunt.
Please stop
repeating your
online friend's
lie.
That's an interesting found poem, NastyGoon. I can't say that the style >>>>>>> you adopted does anything for it, but the content is well worth
expressing..
It seems to show a Michael Ehrhart influence.
wonder where NastyGoon got the idea that this form was my "style".
It is in your style, because it is made up entirely of your words.
It may not be in the same style as your poetry, but it is in your real, >>>> unfiltered, unadorned, up close and personal style.
I don't think George Dance has denied actually writing the words used,
but presenting them as a poem is false, a misrepresentation.
The poems are clearly labeled: "(in the style of George Dance)."
No, the Subject Line is:
"Re: NO ONE, by George Dance"
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:56:39 +0000, HarryLime wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:We see that George Dance has really touched his poetic core with this
NO ONE
by George Dance
(in the style of George Dance)
No one
accused you of
plagiarism,
you
silly
cunt.
Please stop
repeating your
online friend's
lie.
--
Damn, George!
That's so good that it's got me sorry that I banned you from AAPC.
piece. Note the strong anal retentiveness in the threat words,
influenced by a personal intrarectalcranialitis.
"You've got a friend."
On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 12:36:52 +0000, HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 1:37:30 +0000, MummyChunk wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:18:32 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 12:49:21 +0000, Michael Monkey Peabrain aka >>>>>>>>> "HarryLime" wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:30:12 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:56:39 +0000, Michael Monkey aka "HarryLime" >>>>>>> wrote:
Exactly.anyone.NO ONE
by fake George Dance
(in the style of George Dance)
No one
accused you of
plagiarism,
you
silly
c*nt.
Please stop
repeating your
online friend's
lie.
--
Damn, George!
That's so good that it's got me sorry that I banned you from AAPC. >>>>>>>>>
You banned me from aapc? Oh dear, whatever shall I do?
That's absurd, a.a.p.c. is a Usenet newsgroup, Michael Pendragon aka >>>>>>>>> Harry Lime has no control over it and can't possibly "ban"
Please don't try to play dumb, Donkey. You're more than stupid enough
already.
a.a.p.c. was a Usenet newsgroup... until Will Donkey and his socks drove
all of the group's members over to Facebook.
No, Peabrain. No, HarryLiar. aapc still exists as a usenet group. You're
posting to it right now, you stupid c*nt.
No, George Dance.
NEWSFLASH: Usenet is dead.
Absolutely untrue.
How so? "Argument’s an intellectual process. Contradiction’s just the >>>> automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says."
Usenet is a form of internet communication that pre-dated the World Wideusers to
Web. When the Web became a global phenomenon in the late 1990s, Usenet
became out-dated.
It continued to exist for an increasingly small number of users who had
used it in the pre-WWW world, or who studied computer programming, etc.
In 2001, Google created a "Google Groups" app that linked WWW
the Usenet groups. This app was the only way that people who had not >>>>>>>> used Usenet in the pre-WWW world had of discovering Usenet's existence.
Even with the Google app, the Usenet groups continued to dwindle is >>>>>>>> size, leading to Google's abandonment of them last year.
When Google pulled the plug, the majority of Google Group members sought
out other forums.
Most of the Usenet a.a.p.c. members migrated to the Facebook a.a.p.c. >>>>>>>> group.
Since the majority of the members are now there (myself, NancyGene, Jim,
Karen, Corey, Ash, Wenceslaus, Richard, Bob, ME), it *is* the a.a.c.p. >>>>>>>> group. You, your Donkey, Rachel, Jordy, and General Stink) are >>>>>>>> stragglers who have been left behind.
It's as if a club had moved to a new address, and taken the majority of
its patrons with it -- while a handful of former members stubbornly hang
out in the club's former building (now abandoned).
Now a.a.p.c. is a Facebook group.
alt.arts.poetry.comments is and always will be a Usenet newsgroup.
All the blister in the world from Harry Lime aka Michael Pendragon won't >>>>> change that fact.
It's already been changed, Donkey. 75+ % of the group has left Usenet >>>> for Facebook.
alt.arts.poetry.comments may continue to exist as a social forum on
Usenet, but is, and in all probability shall remain, nothing more than a >>>> forum in which to watch Will Donkey playing with his socks.
There is a facebook group that is named after aapc, here:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/105463832836304
- and at least one copycat group. But aapc is still a usenet group, and
will be as long as there's a usenet.
Absolutely correct.
Usenet's a relic. Your Facebook group is an offshoot from a relic. >>>>>>>> There are few members at either -- and fewer members who are actually >>>>>>>> poets.
George Dance had been a member of the Facebook group, but he got himself
banned.
No surprise there with Michael Pendragon aka Harry Lime in charge.
I haven't had to ban anyone else, Donkey. Perhaps the problem is...
George.
If they're not posting here on the real Usenet newsgroup, founded back >>>>> around 1998, they're not really on alt.arts.poetry.comments.No, Lying Michael; I'm a member of both the usenet and facebook groups.
Maybe you're referring to one of those copycat groups, where I wasnt >>>>>>>>> posting.
Calling the Official AAPC Facebook Group a "copycat group" won't >>>>>>> change
the fact that the majority of a.a.p.c. members are now posting there. >>>>>
Based on what logic? A group is several people who have bonded together >>>> (in this case, because they share a common interest in poetry). The
group has moved to a different location.
alt.arts.poetry.comments is no longer a group. It's a location. And
right now, it's looking like a ghost town.
A group is a group of people -- not a Usenet address or a Facebook page.
The group (the members of a.a.c.p.) has relocated
The Usenet poetry newsgroups have had hundreds of poets come and go and >>>>> return again.
"Hundreds" seems like a slight exaggeration. Based on what I've seen
from this group, I'd place the number (generously) around a dozen.
Not just on a.a.p.c but also rec.arts.poems, alt.portry and other Usenet >>>>> newsgroups.
A Facebook page is okay but it's no replacement for Usenet.
It certainly is, as it performs all of the same functions. We can, and >>>> do, post and discuss one another's poetry there.
In fact, I'll even go so far as to say that it's not only a replacement, >>>> but an improvement on Usenet, since we're able to keep it Donkey free. >>>>
Deal with it.
Nothing to deal with, if you prefer Facebook then go there, not a
problem.
This USENET group is far better and offers way more than any FACEBOOK >>>>>>> group
could ever offer.
Absolutely agreed.
Of course you would, Donkey. You're pretty much stuck here.
Why any normal person would post content on Facebook when it can be >>>>>>> removed,
and erased from existence at a whim by faceless algorithms or Facebook >>>>>>> staff
without explanation, reason and in many cases no recourse is beyond me. >>>
Giving Zuck anything is pure stupidity.
Well put.
USENET is forever!
Exactly.
Rah! Rah! Rah
Shouldn't you be working on your Facebook page tonight?
Your choice, and all you're doing is trolling and flaming here anyway. >>>>>That's not what you boasted to Chuck Lysaght
When is the last time you posted a poem here?
A year?
Two years?
Simply more lies and misrepresentations from Harry Lime aka Michael
Pendragon.
I've driven nobody away, anyone who leaves does so by their own choice. >>>>
That was posted in the middle of a massive flame war, I know you're
familiar with those, Harry.
Does it matter? You still drove everyone else away,
No, YOU and your trolling thugs' drove them away, then y'all left
because Google Groups died and none of y'all could figure out how to use
Nova BBS or JLA Forums.
And apparently only you and Nancy Gene have figured out how to use Nova
BBS and JLA Forums to this day.
And so it goes.
And when have you not been in a flame war?
Most of my life, basically.
You brought this current flame war, just as you and your gang of troll
thugs created the last one in 2017 which went on for nearly a decade.
and the last generation (mine) left last year. Various members
of this group often took extended "hiatuses" from a.a.p.c. out of
frustration from having to deal with Will and his toads. There had been >>>>>> a couple of attempts to establish an alternative group (again, with the >>>>>> express purpose of getting away from Will Dockery) in the past -- but >>>>>> they didn't take.
The main reason that they didn't take was because no one really wanted >>>>>> to leave a forum we'd been working to establish a community in for >>>>>> several years. Moving to a different forum was perceived as starting >>>>>> over from square one.
The demise of Google Groups changed that. Since most of us accessed >>>>>> a.a.p.c. through Google Groups, the forum we'd come to know was
effectively gone. NovaBBS looks and feels much different from Google >>>>>> Groups, and might as well be a different forum entirely.
Nova BBS is closer to the original Usenet, Google Groups was simply a >>>>> web portals for Usenet.
Exactly. The unfamiliarity of the forum is what allowed members to
relocate to Facebook
Facebook rules for now, of course.
As did MySpace before that.
Like MySpace (and Topix Forums), when Facebook dies, it'll probably not
be archived.
Yet here you are, still obsessing over me, still trolling me and if
course still flaming me.
I'm only here because you and George
Whine much, Harry?
I'm not a troll.
I didn't expect you to admit it, Harry/Pendragon.
I don't troll.
See above.
You're actually here trolling me, Pendragon.
Do you even know what a troll is?
Yes, I know you quite well, Michael Pendragon aka Harry Lime.
Trolling is a form of fishing where one pulls the bait through the water
to lure fish. A social media troll is someone who attempts to lure
others into a conversation "by deliberately posting inflammatory,
irrelevant, or offensive comments or other disruptive content."
That's exactly what you and your gang of fellow thug trolls did for
nearly a decade here.
So, yes, good riddance.
I only plan on being here until I learn the outcome of George's
mysterious Creeley book.
Estimated time of arrival for the Robert Creeley book is about a week
from now, I think.
If you want to move to Facebook, good luck... and good riddance.
This has been a blessing, as we've never had a single flame war. We are >>>>>> able to post and discuss poetry without having to deal with all the >>>>>> drama, animosity, and "Hello Jordy" nonsense.
So, again, best of luck on your Facebook page.
Without your flaming and trolling here perhaps this newsgroup can grow >>>>> again.
That's a good girl for 2025.
How?
By bringing new poets in again, of course.
Again, how?
Through various promotional campaigns, and without trolls and thugs to
drive them away, these new poets and posters can come here for the
poetry... and be allowed to stay
The only people who know of Usenet's existence are either already using
it, or have moved on (or died).
Things can change with good promotion.
People search the Web with Google. Google's app for "Google Groups" is
archive only.
But the archives)are/ easily searched and can be imported to other
areas, such as right here, right now:
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.music.dylan/c/7rLq6LFsDhs/m/TW3SgUK8AgAJ
Usenet's so far under the radar that it might as well no longer exist.
Usenet is well archived, I've noticed as if this morning:
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.music.dylan/c/7rLq6LFsDhs/m/TW3SgUK8AgAJ
People only found out about Usenet by exploring their Google Apps. Most >>>> people surfing the internet are unaware that Usenet even exists.
These days, yes
In short: it comes down to a matter of what's more important: theSure, spoken like the control freak we know you are, Harry.
unmoderated freedom of Usenet vs the peace of mind from a moderated one. >>>>>
I haven't had to censor a single post,
That's good.
Why did you ban George Dance?
For libel
So you say, but you're sounding a little bit like a drama queen when you
keep whining about something you don't even seem to have valid evidence
of, Pendragon.
H falsely accused me of only publishing my supposed "allies" in "A Year
of Sundays,"
I haven't been following your vanity press publication but the last time
I observed it, thst was true.
A control freak on an ego trip, as Zod described it so well.
When you attack the editorial policy of a literary magazine that's
publishing your poetry, you're toast
When the editor is a control freak on an ego trip, of course.
I give everyone free rein, as olong as they don't attack others -- and >>>> no
one has ever launched an attack.
So why did you ban George Dance from the Facebook group?
So you say.
I'm also aware that you banned George Dance from the Facebook group for
pretty much no reason.
Libel
You mean your accusation of this.
You've written some pretty nasty lies and misrepresentations yourself, Pendragon, do you admit those were also libel?
That doesn't sound like a control freak.
Censoring a man for simply giving his opinions and observations does
sound like the work of a control freak.
Zod's description still seems to apply:
"Control freaks on an ego trip."
And so it goes.
I didn't expect you to agree.
Neither did I expect you to explain how my "hands off" policy at the
Official AAPC Facebook Group makes me a "control freak."
Sure I can.
Your "banning" of George Dance for simply voicing his opinions is a
perfect example that you still fit Zod's description of you (and Jim
Senetto) as a "control freak on an ego trip."
And so it goes.
Getting rid of the trolls
Yet here you are, back on the newsgroup trolling again.
Again, I'm here
To troll and make personal attacks, we know.
Your choice of course.
You don't need my permission to be here, so no reason to explain.
What makes you think I would seek your permission
Meaning this isn't a moderated, censored newsgroup, unlike your "control freak on an ego trip" Facebook page, in which you've already "banned"
George Dance simply for posting his honest opinions.
And so it goes.
As to posterity: nothing is forever. The Internet will eventually be >>>>>> replaced by something vastly different, and be shut down; the sun will >>>>>> die, our galaxy will collapse, the universe will end. In the end, >>>>>> everything will be gone. It's only a matter of how soon the end comes.
That's true of pretty much everything, basically, but the Usenet
newsgroup archives are holding up better than most, although the Google Groups archives can no longer be responded to, they can be accessed and
read somewhat easily, as I found this morning when I did a search and
found
"Listening to Bob Dylan on LSD":
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.music.dylan/c/7rLq6LFsDhs/m/TW3SgUK8AgAJ
For once we agree.
Goodbye, and best of luck with your Facebook poetry group,
Harry/Pendragon.
😏
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:56:39 +0000, HarryLime wrote:a poem by NancyGene
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:
NO ONE
by George Dance
(in the style of George Dance)
No one
accused you of
plagiarism,
you
silly
cunt.
Please stop
repeating your
online friend's
lie.
We see that George Dance has really touched his poetic core with this
piece. Note the strong anal retentiveness in the threat words,
influenced by a personal intrarectalcranialitis.
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:56:39 +0000, HarryLime wrote:a poem by NancyGene
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:
NO ONE
by George Dance
(in the style of George Dance)
No one
accused you of
plagiarism,
you
silly
cunt.
Please stop
repeating your
online friend's
lie.
We see that George Dance has really touched his poetic core with this
piece. Note the strong anal retentiveness in the threat words,
influenced by a personal intrarectalcranialitis.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 493 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 183:43:46 |
Calls: | 9,705 |
Files: | 13,737 |
Messages: | 6,179,548 |