• Re: NO ONE, by George Dance

    From HarryLime@21:1/5 to NancyGene on Mon Feb 17 03:56:39 2025
    XPost: alt.arts.poetry.comments, alt.poetry

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:

    NO ONE
    by George Dance
    (in the style of George Dance)

    No one
    accused you of
    plagiarism,
    you
    silly
    cunt.

    Please stop
    repeating your
    online friend's
    lie.

    --

    Damn, George!

    That's so good that it's got me sorry that I banned you from AAPC.

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From George J. Dance@21:1/5 to NancyGene on Mon Feb 17 10:21:35 2025
    XPost: alt.arts.poetry.comments, alt.poetry

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:

    NO ONE
    by George Dance
    (in the style of George Dance)

    No one
    accused you of
    plagiarism,
    you
    silly
    cunt.

    Please stop
    repeating your
    online friend's
    lie.


    That's an interesting found poem, NastyGoon. I can't say that the style
    you adopted does anything for it, but the content is well worth
    expressing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HarryLime@21:1/5 to NancyGene on Tue Feb 18 02:43:21 2025
    XPost: alt.arts.poetry.comments, alt.poetry

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 21:39:14 +0000, NancyGene wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:56:39 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:

    NO ONE
    by George Dance
    (in the style of George Dance)

    No one
    accused you of
    plagiarism,
    you
    silly
    cunt.

    Please stop
    repeating your
    online friend's
    lie.

    --

    Damn, George!

    That's so good that it's got me sorry that I banned you from AAPC.

    We see that George Dance has really touched his poetic core with this
    piece. Note the strong anal retentiveness in the threat words,
    influenced by a personal intrarectalcranialitis.

    In the oft-repeated words of Will Donkey, you've "Nailed it!," Dr.
    NancyGene.

    "You've got a friend."

    --

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From George J. Dance@21:1/5 to Michael Monkey aka "HarryLime" on Tue Feb 18 10:30:17 2025
    XPost: alt.arts.poetry.comments, alt.poetry

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:56:39 +0000, Michael Monkey aka "HarryLime" wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:

    NO ONE
    by George Dance
    (in the style of George Dance)

    No one
    accused you of
    plagiarism,
    you
    silly
    cunt.

    Please stop
    repeating your
    online friend's
    lie.

    --

    Damn, George!

    That's so good that it's got me sorry that I banned you from AAPC.

    You banned me from aapc? Oh dear, whatever shall I do?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HarryLime@21:1/5 to George J. Dance on Tue Feb 18 12:50:17 2025
    XPost: alt.arts.poetry.comments, alt.poetry

    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:30:12 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:56:39 +0000, Michael Monkey aka "HarryLime" wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:

    NO ONE
    by George Dance
    (in the style of George Dance)

    No one
    accused you of
    plagiarism,
    you
    silly
    cunt.

    Please stop
    repeating your
    online friend's
    lie.

    --

    Damn, George!

    That's so good that it's got me sorry that I banned you from AAPC.

    You banned me from aapc? Oh dear, whatever shall I do?

    Continue whining about it on the Usenet version, I suppose.

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From George J. Dance@21:1/5 to W.Dockery on Fri Feb 21 09:40:13 2025
    XPost: alt.arts.poetry.comments, alt.poetry

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 21:48:38 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 10:21:30 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:

    NO ONE
    by George Dance
    (in the style of George Dance)

    No one
    accused you of
    plagiarism,
    you
    silly
    cunt.

    Please stop
    repeating your
    online friend's
    lie.


    That's an interesting found poem, NastyGoon. I can't say that the style
    you adopted does anything for it, but the content is well worth
    expressing.

    It seems to show a Michael Ehrhart influence.

    It certainly does; I'd even say that it looks very mush like the edit of "Shattered" by Mr. Ehrhart that I rew-edited and posted in that thread.
    OTOH, I can't remember any of my own poems that I've published here, on
    my blog, or in any of my books that look like that. So I do have to
    wonder where NastyGoon got the idea that this form was my "style".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From George J. Dance@21:1/5 to HarryLime on Fri Feb 21 09:33:36 2025
    XPost: alt.arts.poetry.comments, alt.poetry

    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 12:50:17 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:30:12 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:56:39 +0000, Michael Monkey aka "HarryLime" wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:

    NO ONE
    by George Dance
    (in the style of George Dance)

    No one
    accused you of
    plagiarism,
    you
    silly
    cunt.

    Please stop
    repeating your
    online friend's
    lie.

    Damn, George!

    That's so good that it's got me sorry that I banned you from AAPC.

    You banned me from aapc? Oh dear, whatever shall I do?

    Continue whining about it on the Usenet version, I suppose.

    So you think I should continue to post on aapc about your claim to have
    banned me from aapc? All righty, let's do so.

    (1) Obviously you did not ban me from posting to aapc (which is a Usenet
    group) or any of its web portals (despite your efforts to get me banned
    from NovaBBS) since I am still posting to it. So I can't "whine" here
    about being banned from it.

    You did make a show of banning me from your Facebook group (which you
    were calling the "Usenet version" of AYOS" at the time, but you're now
    calling "the Facebook version of aapc"); but I wasn't posting from there
    at the time, and of course I still don't post there. So I can't "whine"
    there about it either.

    So which do you suggest I do? "Whine" about being banned by you from a
    group I'm not banned from, or "whine" about being banned by you from a
    group I wasn't posting to?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HarryLime@21:1/5 to George J. Dance on Fri Feb 21 18:27:25 2025
    XPost: alt.arts.poetry.comments, alt.poetry

    On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 9:33:29 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:

    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 12:50:17 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:30:12 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:56:39 +0000, Michael Monkey aka "HarryLime" wrote: >>>
    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:

    NO ONE
    by George Dance
    (in the style of George Dance)

    No one
    accused you of
    plagiarism,
    you
    silly
    cunt.

    Please stop
    repeating your
    online friend's
    lie.

    Damn, George!

    That's so good that it's got me sorry that I banned you from AAPC.

    You banned me from aapc? Oh dear, whatever shall I do?

    Continue whining about it on the Usenet version, I suppose.

    So you think I should continue to post on aapc about your claim to have banned me from aapc? All righty, let's do so.

    (1) Obviously you did not ban me from posting to aapc (which is a Usenet group) or any of its web portals (despite your efforts to get me banned
    from NovaBBS) since I am still posting to it. So I can't "whine" here
    about being banned from it.

    You did make a show of banning me from your Facebook group (which you
    were calling the "Usenet version" of AYOS" at the time, but you're now calling "the Facebook version of aapc"); but I wasn't posting from there
    at the time, and of course I still don't post there. So I can't "whine"
    there about it either.

    So which do you suggest I do? "Whine" about being banned by you from a
    group I'm not banned from, or "whine" about being banned by you from a
    group I wasn't posting to?

    Which ever one you're whining about, George.

    Based on the above, you seem to be whining about both.

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HarryLime@21:1/5 to George J. Dance on Fri Feb 21 18:34:16 2025
    XPost: alt.arts.poetry.comments, alt.poetry

    On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 9:39:55 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 21:48:38 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 10:21:30 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:

    NO ONE
    by George Dance
    (in the style of George Dance)

    No one
    accused you of
    plagiarism,
    you
    silly
    cunt.

    Please stop
    repeating your
    online friend's
    lie.


    That's an interesting found poem, NastyGoon. I can't say that the style
    you adopted does anything for it, but the content is well worth
    expressing.

    It seems to show a Michael Ehrhart influence.

    It certainly does; I'd even say that it looks very mush like the edit of "Shattered" by Mr. Ehrhart that I rew-edited and posted in that thread.
    OTOH, I can't remember any of my own poems that I've published here, on
    my blog, or in any of my books that look like that. So I do have to
    wonder where NastyGoon got the idea that this form was my "style".

    It is in your style, because it is made up entirely of your words.

    It may not be in the same style as your poetry, but it is in your real, unfiltered, unadorned, up close and personal style.

    It's the style of the real George Dance: petty, vindictive, foul
    mouthed, childish, misogynistic, and thoroughly repulsive.

    As always, HtH & HAND

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HarryLime@21:1/5 to W.Dockery on Fri Feb 21 21:28:47 2025
    XPost: alt.arts.poetry.comments, alt.poetry

    On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 20:48:38 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:

    On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 18:34:07 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

    On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 9:39:55 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 21:48:38 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 10:21:30 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:

    NO ONE
    by George Dance
    (in the style of George Dance)

    No one
    accused you of
    plagiarism,
    you
    silly
    cunt.

    Please stop
    repeating your
    online friend's
    lie.


    That's an interesting found poem, NastyGoon. I can't say that the style >>>>> you adopted does anything for it, but the content is well worth
    expressing..

    It seems to show a Michael Ehrhart influence.

    It certainly does; I'd even say that it looks very mush like the edit of >>> "Shattered" by Mr. Ehrhart that I rew-edited and posted in that thread.
    OTOH, I can't remember any of my own poems that I've published here, on
    my blog, or in any of my books that look like that. So I do have to
    wonder where NastyGoon got the idea that this form was my "style".

    It is in your style, because it is made up entirely of your words.

    It may not be in the same style as your poetry, but it is in your real,
    unfiltered, unadorned, up close and personal style.

    I don't think George Dance has denied actually writing the words used,
    but presenting them as a poem is false, a misrepresentation.

    The poems are clearly labeled: "(in the style of George Dance)."

    And the headers clearly show that the post was by NancyGene.

    One cannot reasonably claim that any misrepresentation has taken place.

    The words are direct quotes from George Dance, and the poems credit him
    with the same.

    George just used them as an excuse to try to have NancyGene banned from NovaBBS, because George can't stand getting his butt whipped by a woman.

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HarryLime@21:1/5 to W.Dockery on Fri Feb 21 21:58:14 2025
    XPost: alt.arts.poetry.comments, alt.poetry

    On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 21:32:35 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:

    On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 21:28:41 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

    On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 20:48:38 +0000, Wikl Dockery wrote:

    On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 18:34:07 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

    On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 9:39:55 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 21:48:38 +0000, Will Dockery wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 10:21:30 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:

    NO ONE
    by George Dance
    (in the style of George Dance)

    No one
    accused you of
    plagiarism,
    you
    silly
    cunt.

    Please stop
    repeating your
    online friend's
    lie.


    That's an interesting found poem, NastyGoon. I can't say that the style >>>>>>> you adopted does anything for it, but the content is well worth
    expressing..

    It seems to show a Michael Ehrhart influence.

    It certainly does; I'd even say that it looks very mush like the edit of >>>>> "Shattered" by Mr. Ehrhart that I rew-edited and posted in that thread. >>>>> OTOH, I can't remember any of my own poems that I've published here, on >>>>> my blog, or in any of my books that look like that. So I do have to
    wonder where NastyGoon got the idea that this form was my "style".

    It is in your style, because it is made up entirely of your words.

    It may not be in the same style as your poetry, but it is in your real, >>>> unfiltered, unadorned, up close and personal style.

    I don't think George Dance has denied actually writing the words used,
    but presenting them as a poem is false, a misrepresentation.

    The poems are clearly labeled: "(in the style of George Dance)."

    No, the Subject Line is:

    "Re: NO ONE, by George Dance"

    In which case the only ones who would be fooled (provided that they fail
    to notice that the thread was started by NancyGene) would be someone who
    didn't actually open the thread.

    I know you're a drama queen, but this is really pushing it.

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From George J. Dance@21:1/5 to NancyGene on Fri Feb 21 22:05:14 2025
    XPost: alt.arts.poetry.comments, alt.poetry

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 21:39:14 +0000, NancyGene wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:56:39 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:

    NO ONE
    by George Dance
    (in the style of George Dance)

    No one
    accused you of
    plagiarism,
    you
    silly
    cunt.

    Please stop
    repeating your
    online friend's
    lie.

    --

    Damn, George!

    That's so good that it's got me sorry that I banned you from AAPC.

    We see that George Dance has really touched his poetic core with this
    piece. Note the strong anal retentiveness in the threat words,
    influenced by a personal intrarectalcranialitis.

    I'm glad you enjoyed the words. Please try to understand their message.

    "You've got a friend."

    HarryLiar doesn't like my calling you his "ally" -you're his online
    "friend."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HarryLime@21:1/5 to W.Dockery on Sat Feb 22 15:03:28 2025
    XPost: alt.arts.poetry.comments

    On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 13:54:24 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:

    On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 12:36:52 +0000, HarryLime wrote:

    Will Dockery wrote:
    HarryLime wrote:
    On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 1:37:30 +0000, MummyChunk wrote:

    HarryLime wrote:
    On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:18:32 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:

    On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 12:49:21 +0000, Michael Monkey Peabrain aka >>>>>>>>> "HarryLime" wrote:

    Will Dockery wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:30:12 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:56:39 +0000, Michael Monkey aka "HarryLime" >>>>>>> wrote:

    NO ONE
    by fake George Dance
    (in the style of George Dance)

    No one
    accused you of
    plagiarism,
    you
    silly
    c*nt.

    Please stop
    repeating your
    online friend's
    lie.

    --

    Damn, George!

    That's so good that it's got me sorry that I banned you from AAPC. >>>>>>>>>
    You banned me from aapc? Oh dear, whatever shall I do?

    That's absurd, a.a.p.c. is a Usenet newsgroup, Michael Pendragon aka >>>>>>>>> Harry Lime has no control over it and can't possibly "ban"
    anyone.

    Please don't try to play dumb, Donkey. You're more than stupid enough
    already.

    a.a.p.c. was a Usenet newsgroup... until Will Donkey and his socks drove
    all of the group's members over to Facebook.

    No, Peabrain. No, HarryLiar. aapc still exists as a usenet group. You're
    posting to it right now, you stupid c*nt.

    No, George Dance.

    NEWSFLASH: Usenet is dead.

    Absolutely untrue.

    How so? "Argument’s an intellectual process. Contradiction’s just the >>>> automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says."


    Usenet is a form of internet communication that pre-dated the World Wide
    Web. When the Web became a global phenomenon in the late 1990s, Usenet
    became out-dated.

    It continued to exist for an increasingly small number of users who had
    used it in the pre-WWW world, or who studied computer programming, etc.

    In 2001, Google created a "Google Groups" app that linked WWW
    users to
    the Usenet groups. This app was the only way that people who had not >>>>>>>> used Usenet in the pre-WWW world had of discovering Usenet's existence.

    Even with the Google app, the Usenet groups continued to dwindle is >>>>>>>> size, leading to Google's abandonment of them last year.

    When Google pulled the plug, the majority of Google Group members sought
    out other forums.

    Most of the Usenet a.a.p.c. members migrated to the Facebook a.a.p.c. >>>>>>>> group.

    Since the majority of the members are now there (myself, NancyGene, Jim,
    Karen, Corey, Ash, Wenceslaus, Richard, Bob, ME), it *is* the a.a.c.p. >>>>>>>> group. You, your Donkey, Rachel, Jordy, and General Stink) are >>>>>>>> stragglers who have been left behind.

    It's as if a club had moved to a new address, and taken the majority of
    its patrons with it -- while a handful of former members stubbornly hang
    out in the club's former building (now abandoned).


    Now a.a.p.c. is a Facebook group.

    alt.arts.poetry.comments is and always will be a Usenet newsgroup.

    All the blister in the world from Harry Lime aka Michael Pendragon won't >>>>> change that fact.

    It's already been changed, Donkey. 75+ % of the group has left Usenet >>>> for Facebook.

    alt.arts.poetry.comments may continue to exist as a social forum on
    Usenet, but is, and in all probability shall remain, nothing more than a >>>> forum in which to watch Will Donkey playing with his socks.


    There is a facebook group that is named after aapc, here:
    https://www.facebook.com/groups/105463832836304
    - and at least one copycat group. But aapc is still a usenet group, and
    will be as long as there's a usenet.

    Absolutely correct.

    Usenet's a relic. Your Facebook group is an offshoot from a relic. >>>>>>>> There are few members at either -- and fewer members who are actually >>>>>>>> poets.


    George Dance had been a member of the Facebook group, but he got himself
    banned.

    No surprise there with Michael Pendragon aka Harry Lime in charge.


    I haven't had to ban anyone else, Donkey. Perhaps the problem is...
    George.



    No, Lying Michael; I'm a member of both the usenet and facebook groups.
    Maybe you're referring to one of those copycat groups, where I wasnt >>>>>>>>> posting.

    Calling the Official AAPC Facebook Group a "copycat group" won't >>>>>>> change
    the fact that the majority of a.a.p.c. members are now posting there. >>>>>
    If they're not posting here on the real Usenet newsgroup, founded back >>>>> around 1998, they're not really on alt.arts.poetry.comments.

    Based on what logic? A group is several people who have bonded together >>>> (in this case, because they share a common interest in poetry). The
    group has moved to a different location.

    alt.arts.poetry.comments is no longer a group. It's a location. And
    right now, it's looking like a ghost town.


    A group is a group of people -- not a Usenet address or a Facebook page.
    The group (the members of a.a.c.p.) has relocated

    The Usenet poetry newsgroups have had hundreds of poets come and go and >>>>> return again.

    "Hundreds" seems like a slight exaggeration. Based on what I've seen
    from this group, I'd place the number (generously) around a dozen.


    Not just on a.a.p.c but also rec.arts.poems, alt.portry and other Usenet >>>>> newsgroups.

    A Facebook page is okay but it's no replacement for Usenet.

    It certainly is, as it performs all of the same functions. We can, and >>>> do, post and discuss one another's poetry there.

    In fact, I'll even go so far as to say that it's not only a replacement, >>>> but an improvement on Usenet, since we're able to keep it Donkey free. >>>>

    Deal with it.

    Nothing to deal with, if you prefer Facebook then go there, not a
    problem.

    This USENET group is far better and offers way more than any FACEBOOK >>>>>>> group
    could ever offer.

    Absolutely agreed.

    Of course you would, Donkey. You're pretty much stuck here.


    Why any normal person would post content on Facebook when it can be >>>>>>> removed,
    and erased from existence at a whim by faceless algorithms or Facebook >>>>>>> staff
    without explanation, reason and in many cases no recourse is beyond me. >>>
    Exactly.

    Giving Zuck anything is pure stupidity.

    Well put.

    USENET is forever!

    Exactly.

    Rah! Rah! Rah

    Shouldn't you be working on your Facebook page tonight?

    Your choice, and all you're doing is trolling and flaming here anyway. >>>>>
    When is the last time you posted a poem here?

    A year?

    Two years?

    Simply more lies and misrepresentations from Harry Lime aka Michael
    Pendragon.

    I've driven nobody away, anyone who leaves does so by their own choice. >>>>
    That's not what you boasted to Chuck Lysaght

    That was posted in the middle of a massive flame war, I know you're
    familiar with those, Harry.

    Does it matter? You still drove everyone else away,

    No, YOU and your trolling thugs' drove them away, then y'all left
    because Google Groups died and none of y'all could figure out how to use
    Nova BBS or JLA Forums.

    Uh, we weren't around when Chuck Lysaght was alive. You can't possibly
    blame any of us for that one.


    And apparently only you and Nancy Gene have figured out how to use Nova
    BBS and JLA Forums to this day.

    And so it goes.

    Wrong, Donkey.

    It doesn't require any figuring out. It just makes more sense to start
    over at Facebook in a Donkey-free environment, then to subject ourselves
    to the constant Donkey drama over here.


    And when have you not been in a flame war?

    Most of my life, basically.

    LOL. Only because the internet didn't become accessible until you were
    40!


    You brought this current flame war, just as you and your gang of troll
    thugs created the last one in 2017 which went on for nearly a decade.

    There is no "gang," there are no "thugs," and this flame war was started
    by George Dance.


    and the last generation (mine) left last year. Various members
    of this group often took extended "hiatuses" from a.a.p.c. out of
    frustration from having to deal with Will and his toads. There had been >>>>>> a couple of attempts to establish an alternative group (again, with the >>>>>> express purpose of getting away from Will Dockery) in the past -- but >>>>>> they didn't take.

    The main reason that they didn't take was because no one really wanted >>>>>> to leave a forum we'd been working to establish a community in for >>>>>> several years. Moving to a different forum was perceived as starting >>>>>> over from square one.

    The demise of Google Groups changed that. Since most of us accessed >>>>>> a.a.p.c. through Google Groups, the forum we'd come to know was
    effectively gone. NovaBBS looks and feels much different from Google >>>>>> Groups, and might as well be a different forum entirely.

    Nova BBS is closer to the original Usenet, Google Groups was simply a >>>>> web portals for Usenet.

    Exactly. The unfamiliarity of the forum is what allowed members to
    relocate to Facebook

    Facebook rules for now, of course.

    As did MySpace before that.

    Like MySpace (and Topix Forums), when Facebook dies, it'll probably not
    be archived.

    Probably not.

    But like I said, we publish an annual paperback book featuring our
    group's best poetry and artwork.


    Yet here you are, still obsessing over me, still trolling me and if
    course still flaming me.

    I'm only here because you and George

    Whine much, Harry?

    Just correcting your b.s., Donkey.


    I'm not a troll.

    I didn't expect you to admit it, Harry/Pendragon.

    I don't troll.

    See above.

    There's nothing to see above, Donkey. You called me a troll, and
    accused me of having a gang of thugs -- and provided no evidence to back
    up your claims.




    You're actually here trolling me, Pendragon.

    Do you even know what a troll is?

    Yes, I know you quite well, Michael Pendragon aka Harry Lime.

    If you knew me, you'd know that I'm a Troll Buster.


    Trolling is a form of fishing where one pulls the bait through the water
    to lure fish. A social media troll is someone who attempts to lure
    others into a conversation "by deliberately posting inflammatory,
    irrelevant, or offensive comments or other disruptive content."

    That's exactly what you and your gang of fellow thug trolls did for
    nearly a decade here.

    Funny, but I remember Jim (one of my supposed gang members) having
    started a weekly thread called "The Sunday Sampler," where we could all
    lay aside our arguments and come together in peace. I also remember,
    that once "The Sunday Sampler" caught on, I and my supposed "gang" spent
    nearly all of our a.a.p.c. time there -- posting and discussing poetry.

    I also remember you unleashing a barrage of posts every day in a
    desperate attempt for attention, which my so-called "gang of thugs"
    ignored.

    So, yes, good riddance.

    I only plan on being here until I learn the outcome of George's
    mysterious Creeley book.

    Estimated time of arrival for the Robert Creeley book is about a week
    from now, I think.

    If you want to move to Facebook, good luck... and good riddance.

    This has been a blessing, as we've never had a single flame war. We are >>>>>> able to post and discuss poetry without having to deal with all the >>>>>> drama, animosity, and "Hello Jordy" nonsense.

    So, again, best of luck on your Facebook page.

    Without your flaming and trolling here perhaps this newsgroup can grow >>>>> again.

    That's a good girl for 2025.

    Zip your pants back up, Donkey. It's just a computer.


    How?

    By bringing new poets in again, of course.

    Again, how?

    Through various promotional campaigns, and without trolls and thugs to
    drive them away, these new poets and posters can come here for the
    poetry... and be allowed to stay

    Promotional campaigns where? On Facebook? Kind of ironic, don'tcha
    think?


    The only people who know of Usenet's existence are either already using
    it, or have moved on (or died).

    Things can change with good promotion.

    Even if you miraculously managed to get the word out, anyone who came
    here would be immediately repulsed by the 100s of Will Donkey posts that clutter the archives like spam.

    People join poetry groups because they want insightful commentary on
    their poetry -- not to receive a generic one-word slurp. You and your
    socks can't offer that.


    People search the Web with Google. Google's app for "Google Groups" is
    archive only.

    But the archives)are/ easily searched and can be imported to other
    areas, such as right here, right now:

    People have to know they exist before they can be expected to search
    them.

    And what's the attraction here? Usenet is to the World Wide Web as DOS
    is to Microsoft. It should have a black screen with bright green
    letters.


    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.music.dylan/c/7rLq6LFsDhs/m/TW3SgUK8AgAJ

    Usenet's so far under the radar that it might as well no longer exist.

    Usenet is well archived, I've noticed as if this morning:


    But no one in their right mind (and no one who isn't, for that matter)
    is going to slog through 100s of 1,000s of "Hello Jordy" posts.

    The amount of worthwhile information one could (hypothetically) glean
    from a.a.p.c. archives is far to minimal to justify the time and effort.
    It's a needle in a haystack type of deal.


    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.music.dylan/c/7rLq6LFsDhs/m/TW3SgUK8AgAJ

    People only found out about Usenet by exploring their Google Apps. Most >>>> people surfing the internet are unaware that Usenet even exists.

    These days, yes

    In short: it comes down to a matter of what's more important: the
    unmoderated freedom of Usenet vs the peace of mind from a moderated one. >>>>>
    Sure, spoken like the control freak we know you are, Harry.

    I haven't had to censor a single post,

    That's good.

    Why did you ban George Dance?

    For libel

    So you say, but you're sounding a little bit like a drama queen when you
    keep whining about something you don't even seem to have valid evidence
    of, Pendragon.

    I do have valid evidence, Donkey. George Dance thanked me for
    publishing his poetry by accusing me of only publishing people who I
    considered "allies."

    I'm not going to search the archive for it (Needle. Haystack. See
    Above.), but if you want to look for it, it's there.


    H falsely accused me of only publishing my supposed "allies" in "A Year
    of Sundays,"

    I haven't been following your vanity press publication but the last time
    I observed it, thst was true.

    How is that true, Donkey?

    Name ONE person who posted a poem to our group who was excluded from publication in either our monthly or our annual publication.


    A control freak on an ego trip, as Zod described it so well.

    An idiotic statement from an idiot.


    When you attack the editorial policy of a literary magazine that's
    publishing your poetry, you're toast

    When the editor is a control freak on an ego trip, of course.

    Again Donkey, I have a hands-off policy in the FB group. Everyone does
    their own thing. And as hard as it may be for a Donkey to believe,
    everyone gets along.



    I give everyone free rein, as olong as they don't attack others -- and >>>> no
    one has ever launched an attack.

    So why did you ban George Dance from the Facebook group?

    How many times do I have to tell you, before it sinks in to your little
    Donkey brain?

    George libeled me regarding "A Year of Sundays'" editorial policy,
    claiming that I only published my supposed "allies."

    I think George was trying to say that you and your Stinksock were
    excluded from joining the group -- but that isn't what he wrote.

    Had he said that the Official AAPC Facebook Group was exclusive, I
    wouldn't have had a problem. We're not. We welcome everyone to join.
    We just have a "No Donkeys or Pissbums allowed" sign prominently
    displayed on our door.

    But George attack the integrity of our publication, and my integrity as
    an editor -- and cut his own throat in the process.

    Our sign now reads: "No Donkeys, Dunces, or Pissbums allowed."


    So you say.

    I'm also aware that you banned George Dance from the Facebook group for
    pretty much no reason.

    Libel

    You mean your accusation of this.

    No, Donkey. I mean what I say.


    You've written some pretty nasty lies and misrepresentations yourself, Pendragon, do you admit those were also libel?

    Of course not, Donkey. Everything I've said about you and your friends
    was based on information in your posts.

    George's attack on my editorial policy was a bald-faced lie.


    That doesn't sound like a control freak.

    Censoring a man for simply giving his opinions and observations does
    sound like the work of a control freak.

    He didn't give an opinion, Donkey. He lied.

    And his lies were intended to cast aspersions on my integrity as an
    editor, and on the integrity of "A Year of Sundays" (which, up until
    that time, had published his poetry).


    Zod's description still seems to apply:

    "Control freaks on an ego trip."

    And so it goes.


    You keep repeating yourself, Donkey. Back on the sauce?


    I didn't expect you to agree.

    Neither did I expect you to explain how my "hands off" policy at the
    Official AAPC Facebook Group makes me a "control freak."

    Sure I can.

    Your "banning" of George Dance for simply voicing his opinions is a
    perfect example that you still fit Zod's description of you (and Jim
    Senetto) as a "control freak on an ego trip."

    My banning George Dance for libeling me was the nicest thing I could
    have done.


    And so it goes.

    Getting rid of the trolls

    Yet here you are, back on the newsgroup trolling again.

    Again, I'm here

    To troll and make personal attacks, we know.

    Your choice of course.

    You don't need my permission to be here, so no reason to explain.

    What makes you think I would seek your permission

    Meaning this isn't a moderated, censored newsgroup, unlike your "control freak on an ego trip" Facebook page, in which you've already "banned"
    George Dance simply for posting his honest opinions.

    Like I said, Donkey, the Facebook AAPC group isn't really moderated
    (apart from keeping you and your socks from posting there).

    And George Dance was banned for libel. I realize he's a dunce, but if
    you were to tell any editor that he only uses his magazine to publish
    his friends, you'd be banned from that publication as well.


    And so it goes.

    As to posterity: nothing is forever. The Internet will eventually be >>>>>> replaced by something vastly different, and be shut down; the sun will >>>>>> die, our galaxy will collapse, the universe will end. In the end, >>>>>> everything will be gone. It's only a matter of how soon the end comes.

    That's true of pretty much everything, basically, but the Usenet
    newsgroup archives are holding up better than most, although the Google Groups archives can no longer be responded to, they can be accessed and
    read somewhat easily, as I found this morning when I did a search and
    found
    "Listening to Bob Dylan on LSD":

    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.music.dylan/c/7rLq6LFsDhs/m/TW3SgUK8AgAJ

    For once we agree.

    Goodbye, and best of luck with your Facebook poetry group,
    Harry/Pendragon.

    😏

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From George J. Dance@21:1/5 to NancyGene on Tue Mar 4 13:10:22 2025
    XPost: alt.arts.poetry.comments, alt.poetry

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 21:39:14 +0000, NancyGene wrote:
    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:56:39 +0000, HarryLime wrote:
    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:

    NO ONE
    a poem by NancyGene

    by George Dance

    Nope. Not my poem. (Though NastyGoon did take her source text from
    something I once told her.)

    (in the style of George Dance)

    Nope. Not my "style" of poetry either. I've asked that the attribution
    lines be removed before it's published in /A Year of Sundays/ (in full
    color) at year end.


    No one
    accused you of
    plagiarism,
    you
    silly
    cunt.

    Please stop
    repeating your
    online friend's
    lie.


    We see that George Dance has really touched his poetic core with this
    piece. Note the strong anal retentiveness in the threat words,

    Where are the "threat words" NastyGoon? If you feel threatened by being
    called a cunt, maybe you should stop acting like a cunt.

    influenced by a personal intrarectalcranialitis.

    "Dr." NastyGoon may be the world's leading expert on
    intrarectalcranialitis. Obviously such a career has informed their
    poetry.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From George J. Dance@21:1/5 to NancyGene on Tue Mar 4 13:11:28 2025
    XPost: alt.arts.poetry.comments, alt.poetry

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 21:39:14 +0000, NancyGene wrote:
    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:56:39 +0000, HarryLime wrote:
    On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 3:32:12 +0000, NancyGene wrote:

    NO ONE
    a poem by NancyGene

    by George Dance

    Nope. Not my poem. (Though NastyGoon did take her source text from
    something I once told her.)

    (in the style of George Dance)

    Nope. Not my "style" of poetry either. I've asked that the attribution
    lines be removed before it's published in /A Year of Sundays/ (in full
    color) at year end.


    No one
    accused you of
    plagiarism,
    you
    silly
    cunt.

    Please stop
    repeating your
    online friend's
    lie.


    We see that George Dance has really touched his poetic core with this
    piece. Note the strong anal retentiveness in the threat words,

    Where are the "threat words" NastyGoon? As the author of the poem, you
    should be able to point them out.

    influenced by a personal intrarectalcranialitis.

    "Dr." NastyGoon may be the world's leading expert on
    intrarectalcranialitis. Obviously such a career has informed her
    poetry.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)