Another good Usenet newsgroups portal is JLA Forums:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=655
Hi Retro Guy. Would it be possible for NovaBBS to "quote" the post that we're responding to in the Message reply box?
Lacking the quoted text,
it's difficult to address multiple questions raised in some of the
longer posts.
Hi Retro Guy. Would it be possible for NovaBBS to "quote" the post that we're responding to in the Message reply box? Lacking the quoted text,
it's difficult to address multiple questions raised in some of the
longer posts.
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 17:04:11 +0000, HarryLime wrote:
Hi Retro Guy. Would it be possible for NovaBBS to "quote" the post that
we're responding to in the Message reply box? Lacking the quoted text,
it's difficult to address multiple questions raised in some of the
longer posts.
Hi, I'm doing exactly that right now.
Once you click on 'Reply', there should be a 'Quote' button at the
bottom of the message window where you type. The only reason I can see
that it may not be there is if you have javascript disabled.
Please let me know if it's not working properly as described.
I tried posting on JLA, and ran into that problem in my first post. I
decided to not use them for another reason - they won't post usenet
messages with web links (other than to JLA, of course) - but seeing how
they butcher threads gave me another reason to avoid them.
Hi Retro Guy. Would it be possible for NovaBBS to "quote" the post that we're responding to in the Message reply box? Lacking the quoted text,
it's difficult to address multiple questions raised in some of the
longer posts.
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 16:43:13 +0000, Retro Guy wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:48:54 +0000, Will Dockery wrote:
Another good Usenet newsgroups portal is JLA Forums:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=655
I just wish they would fix their line wrap in quoting, which sometimes
produces broken quote lines, and that they would produce proper
references headers so that threading worked properly for those using a
newsreader.
Usually, everything shows as a reply to the first article in the thread,
not the actual article being replied to, so no threading in newsreaders.
How's it looking, Retro Guy?
I'm not very well versed in these matters so I can't judge properly.
yesterday, andLOL!
Sorry, I typed and posted this during a Christmas party
the typo slipped in.
Consider it hereby corrected:
I just wish they would fix their line wrap in quoting, whichsometimes
produces broken quote lines, and that they would produce properusing a
references headers so that threading worked properly for those
newsreader.thread,
Usually, everything shows as a reply to the first article in the
not the actual article being replied to, so no threading innewsreaders.
On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 13:50:39 +0000, Retro Guy wrote:
On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 13:09:15 +0000, Will Dockery wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 16:43:13 +0000, Retro Guy wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:48:54 +0000, Will Dockery wrote:
Another good Usenet newsgroups portal is JLA Forums:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=655
I just wish they would fix their line wrap in quoting, which sometimes >>>> produces broken quote lines, and that they would produce proper
references headers so that threading worked properly for those using a >>>> newsreader.
Usually, everything shows as a reply to the first article in the
thread,
not the actual article being replied to, so no threading in
newsreaders.
How's it looking, Retro Guy?
I'm not very well versed in these matters so I can't judge properly.
This reply that you just made looks fine, but I think you wrote this
from novaBBS.
If you scroll up in this thread to posts from Will-Dockery, you will see
lines like:
yesterday, andLOL!
;
Sorry, I typed and posted this during a Christmas party
the typo slipped in.
;
Consider it hereby corrected:
Where 'yesterday, and' is wrapped to a new line without quoting. It
breaks the quoting.
Another above:
I just wish they would fix their line wrap in quoting, whichsometimes
produces broken quote lines, and that they would produce properusing a
references headers so that threading worked properly for those
newsreader.thread,
;
Usually, everything shows as a reply to the first article in the
not the actual article being replied to, so no threading innewsreaders.
;
where a bunch of lines have the same issue.
Jlaforum wraps the lines, but does not maintain the quote level, so they
look a mess in a newsreader (and novaBBS). Then when someone quotes that
in a newsreader, it looks like a bunch of lines are written by a
previous poster, not the person who actually quoted them. It's a mess.
It seems Jlaforum using web forum software that does not understand
quoting properly for Usenet. Sometimes I see stuff like, '[quote]' or
'[/quote]' which is completely useless outside of the web forum
software, and looks a mess in a newsreader.
Basically, Jlaforum does not maintain Usenet quoting standards, and also
does not seem to maintain Usenet 'References: ' headers properly, which
results in replies looking like they are to a different post than the
really are. So a newsreader can only go by this and it breaks threading
in a newsreader.
Plus, the dates are wrong, or at least they are not accurate, as they
are the date/time when the post was sent to giganews, not the date/time
when the user posted it. So when Jlaforum dumps their posts to giganews,
all the posts each dump get the same timestamp.
Not great for Usenet groups, but the software they use isn't made for
Usenet groups.
My biggest problem with JLA Forums is that vast stretches of my posts
from years such as 2007 and 2008 are not appearing in their archives. I
just spent a couple of hours going through 2007 there and almost nothing
I posted that year appears, in fact, dozens or even hundreds of my
Usenet posts from say 2003 to 2009 are missing from the JLA Forums
version of this newsgroup.
There may actually be other posts and posters missing as well, since I
don't seem to see as much from Dennis M Hammes, J.R. Sherman or even
Peter j. Ross as if expect to see in the archives so I suspect it isn't
just my posts that have been deleted.
It makes reading and posting at JLA Forums and ultimately frustrating experience, as far as going into the past through the archives goes.
Another good Usenet newsgroups portal is JLA Forums:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=655
Will-Dockery wrote:
I can say that in the past couple of weeks JLA Forums has vastly
improved.
This is a redundant spam sig from: http://www.jlaforums.com
Otherwise you'd ask for a refund, donkey.
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 16:43:13 +0000, Retro Guy wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:48:54 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:
Another good Usenet newsgroups portal is JLA Forums:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=655
I just wish they would fix their line wrap in quoting, which sometimes
produces broken quote lines, and that they would produce proper
references headers so that threading worked properly for those using a
newsreader.
Usually, everything shows as a reply to the first article in the thread,
not the actual article being replied to, so no threading in newsreaders.
Hopefully some of these technical issues have been resolved, Retro Guy.
As far as I can tell with my limited knowledge of such matters it seems improvements have been made.
Retro Guy wrote:
I just wish they would fix their line wrap in quoting, whichsometimes
produces broken quote lines, and that they would produce properusing a
references headers so that threading worked properly for those
newsreader.thread,
Usually, everything shows as a reply to the first article in the
not the actual article being replied to, so no threading innewsreaders.
--
Retro Guy
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 13:15:39 +0000, Retro Guy wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 12:35:47 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 16:43:13 +0000, Retro Guy wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:48:54 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:Hopefully some of these technical issues have been resolved, Retro Guy.
Another good Usenet newsgroups portal is JLA Forums:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=655
I just wish they would fix their line wrap in quoting, which sometimes >>>> produces broken quote lines, and that they would produce proper
references headers so that threading worked properly for those using a >>>> newsreader.
Usually, everything shows as a reply to the first article in the thread, >>>> not the actual article being replied to, so no threading in newsreaders. >>>
As far as I can tell with my limited knowledge of such matters it seems
improvements have been made.
When you post from there, I'm not seeing a difference. From this thread,
note the line wrapping is a mess:
-----------------
Retro Guy wrote:sometimes
I just wish they would fix their line wrap in quoting, which
produces broken quote lines, and that they would produce properusing a
references headers so that threading worked properly for those
newsreader.thread,
Usually, everything shows as a reply to the first article in the
not the actual article being replied to, so no threading innewsreaders.
--
Retro Guy
I can say that in the past couple of weeks JLA Forums has vastly
improved.
------------------
I can take a look at the other issues (dates, etc.), but I'm not sure
anything has changed. The formatting is by far the worst part of it. It
makes a mess of quoting. The References: header in that message has only
one reference, so threading will be incorrect.
Yes, I'm seeing the line wrapping is happening.
I'm not sure how the JLA Forums moderator can solve this, but perhaps
you could offer some tips here, Retro Guy?
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 14:14:18 +0000, Retro Guy wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 13:40:58 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 13:15:39 +0000, Retro Guy wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 12:35:47 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 16:43:13 +0000, Retro Guy wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:48:54 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:Hopefully some of these technical issues have been resolved, Retro Guy. >>>>> As far as I can tell with my limited knowledge of such matters it seems >>>>> improvements have been made.
Another good Usenet newsgroups portal is JLA Forums:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=655
I just wish they would fix their line wrap in quoting, which sometimes >>>>>> produces broken quote lines, and that they would produce proper
references headers so that threading worked properly for those using a >>>>>> newsreader.
Usually, everything shows as a reply to the first article in the thread, >>>>>> not the actual article being replied to, so no threading in newsreaders. >>>>>
When you post from there, I'm not seeing a difference. From this thread, >>>> note the line wrapping is a mess:
-----------------
Retro Guy wrote:sometimes
I just wish they would fix their line wrap in quoting, which
produces broken quote lines, and that they would produce properusing a
references headers so that threading worked properly for those
newsreader.thread,
Usually, everything shows as a reply to the first article in the
not the actual article being replied to, so no threading innewsreaders.
--
Retro Guy
I can say that in the past couple of weeks JLA Forums has vastly
improved.
------------------
I can take a look at the other issues (dates, etc.), but I'm not sure
anything has changed. The formatting is by far the worst part of it. It >>>> makes a mess of quoting. The References: header in that message has only >>>> one reference, so threading will be incorrect.
Yes, I'm seeing the line wrapping is happening.
I'm not sure how the JLA Forums moderator can solve this, but perhaps
you could offer some tips here, Retro Guy?
They would need to modify the code of their site to fix this. Since
their software does not seem to support Usenet articles properly,
someone would need to rewrite the code to do do so.
Their site uses 'newsSync' to send the articles to giganews, but it does
not change the formatting, it just sends a badly formatted article to
Usenet, including missing References headers.
Their software is just simply not meant for Usenet, unless they fix it.
It appears to just be web forum software pretending that Usenet articles
are part of their site. As long as a user stays there, it's all good,
but the articles that get sent out do not conform to the network they
are being sent to (Usenet).
This is a problem Google Groups apparently didn't have, right?
I don't think this was a problem with the Google Groups version of
Usenet?
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 19:43:54 +0000, Retro Guy wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 15:13:54 +0000, Will Dockery wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 14:14:18 +0000, Retro Guy wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 13:40:58 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 13:15:39 +0000, Retro Guy wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 12:35:47 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 16:43:13 +0000, Retro Guy wrote:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:48:54 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:
Another good Usenet newsgroups portal is JLA Forums:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=655
I just wish they would fix their line wrap in quoting, which sometimes >>>>>>>> produces broken quote lines, and that they would produce proper >>>>>>>> references headers so that threading worked properly for those using a >>>>>>>> newsreader.
Usually, everything shows as a reply to the first article in the thread,
not the actual article being replied to, so no threading in newsreaders.
Hopefully some of these technical issues have been resolved, Retro Guy. >>>>>>> As far as I can tell with my limited knowledge of such matters it seems >>>>>>> improvements have been made.
When you post from there, I'm not seeing a difference. From this thread, >>>>>> note the line wrapping is a mess:
-----------------
Retro Guy wrote:sometimes
I just wish they would fix their line wrap in quoting, which
produces broken quote lines, and that they would produce proper >>>>>> > references headers so that threading worked properly for thoseusing a
newsreader.newsreaders.
Usually, everything shows as a reply to the first article in the >>>>>> thread,
not the actual article being replied to, so no threading in
--
Retro Guy
I can say that in the past couple of weeks JLA Forums has vastly
improved.
------------------
I can take a look at the other issues (dates, etc.), but I'm not sure >>>>>> anything has changed. The formatting is by far the worst part of it. It >>>>>> makes a mess of quoting. The References: header in that message has only >>>>>> one reference, so threading will be incorrect.
Yes, I'm seeing the line wrapping is happening.
I'm not sure how the JLA Forums moderator can solve this, but perhaps >>>>> you could offer some tips here, Retro Guy?
They would need to modify the code of their site to fix this. Since
their software does not seem to support Usenet articles properly,
someone would need to rewrite the code to do do so.
Their site uses 'newsSync' to send the articles to giganews, but it does >>>> not change the formatting, it just sends a badly formatted article to
Usenet, including missing References headers.
Their software is just simply not meant for Usenet, unless they fix it. >>>> It appears to just be web forum software pretending that Usenet articles >>>> are part of their site. As long as a user stays there, it's all good,
but the articles that get sent out do not conform to the network they
are being sent to (Usenet).
This is a problem Google Groups apparently didn't have, right?
I don't think this was a problem with the Google Groups version of
Usenet?
Google Groups had some formatting issues, but not anywhere near as bad
as jlaforum. You usually didn't notice it.
Of course GG was made for Usenet (I assume), and Google can pretty much
code whatever they want to code. Their interface did work, and the
articles were mostly Usenet compliant.
Before I started novaBBS, I tried to modify a web forum software for
Usenet use (FudForum) but very quickly realized that it was a bad idea.
I got it working fine, but the articles sent were not well formatted,
and incoming articles were not handled well. I gave up pretty quickly
and decided to just write my own. I actually forked an old, out of date
and didn't work anymore piece of software and modified it, heavily.
I'm not an expert, but I feel like Nova BBS does a pretty good job.
On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 10:21:12 +0000, Retro Guy wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 22:46:06 +0000, Will Dockery wrote:
Retro Guy wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
Retro Guy wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
Another good Usenet newsgroups portal is JLA Forums:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=655
I just wish they would fix their line wrap in quoting, which sometimes
produces broken quote lines, and that they would produce proper >>>>>>>>>> references headers so that threading worked properly for those using a
newsreader.
Usually, everything shows as a reply to the first article in the thread,
not the actual article being replied to, so no threading in newsreaders.
Hopefully some of these technical issues have been resolved, Retro Guy.
As far as I can tell with my limited knowledge of such matters it seems
improvements have been made.
When you post from there, I'm not seeing a difference. From this thread,
note the line wrapping is a mess:
-----------------
Retro Guy wrote:
I just wish they would fix their line wrap in quoting, which >>>>>>>> sometimes
produces broken quote lines, and that they would produce proper >>>>>>>> > references headers so that threading worked properly for those >>>>>>>> using a
newsreader.
Usually, everything shows as a reply to the first article in the >>>>>>>> thread,
not the actual article being replied to, so no threading in >>>>>>>> newsreaders.
--
Retro Guy
I can say that in the past couple of weeks JLA Forums has vastly >>>>>>>> improved.
------------------
I can take a look at the other issues (dates, etc.), but I'm not sure >>>>>>>> anything has changed. The formatting is by far the worst part of it. It
makes a mess of quoting. The References: header in that message has only
one reference, so threading will be incorrect.
Yes, I'm seeing the line wrapping is happening.
I'm not sure how the JLA Forums moderator can solve this, but perhaps >>>>>>> you could offer some tips here, Retro Guy?
They would need to modify the code of their site to fix this. Since >>>>>> their software does not seem to support Usenet articles properly,
someone would need to rewrite the code to do do so.
Their site uses 'newsSync' to send the articles to giganews, but it does >>>>>> not change the formatting, it just sends a badly formatted article to >>>>>> Usenet, including missing References headers.
Their software is just simply not meant for Usenet, unless they fix it. >>>>>> It appears to just be web forum software pretending that Usenet articles >>>>>> are part of their site. As long as a user stays there, it's all good, >>>>>> but the articles that get sent out do not conform to the network they >>>>>> are being sent to (Usenet).
This is a problem Google Groups apparently didn't have, right?
I don't think this was a problem with the Google Groups version of
Usenet?
Google Groups had some formatting issues, but not anywhere near as bad >>>> as jlaforum. You usually didn't notice it.
Of course GG was made for Usenet (I assume), and Google can pretty much >>>> code whatever they want to code. Their interface did work, and the
articles were mostly Usenet compliant.
Before I started novaBBS, I tried to modify a web forum software for
Usenet use (FudForum) but very quickly realized that it was a bad idea. >>>> I got it working fine, but the articles sent were not well formatted,
and incoming articles were not handled well. I gave up pretty quickly
and decided to just write my own. I actually forked an old, out of date >>>> and didn't work anymore piece of software and modified it, heavily.
I'm not an expert, but I feel like Nova BBS does a pretty good job.
Thank you. I think the whole idea is to at least try. novaBBS has bugs,
and when someone points one out, and can demonstrate how to duplicate
it, I try to fix it. Try is the main word here, I may fail :) In fact,
novaBBS used to have the same quoting issue as jlaforum, until a user
did some testing and showed me exactly when it would happen. Then, I
fixed it, after several attempts and with the user providing feedback
along the way.
When jlaform reached out to me about novaBBS removing advertising
injected into posts, we discussed it, and I temporarily removed that
filter (it's back now). But when I mentioned to the person at jla the
issuses we have discussed above, then completely ignore every word I
said about it. (S)He only seemed to care about making sure their
advertising gets through. Nothing more.
<4f83b5b9e5da34fe53f4f6d3e12c6164@www.novabbs.org>
https://www.novabbs.com/rocksolid/article-flat.php?id=1911&group=rocksolid.nodes.help#1911
You can't fix something if you don't seem to have any interest in doing
so.
I understand, there seems to be a definite communication gap here
between you at Nova BBS and the moderator at JLA Forums.
Hopefully you can get these problems worked out in the coming days.
Will Dockery wrote:
Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo> posted:
Will Dockery <user3274> wrote in
news:1751072183-3274@newsgrouper.org:
kfries@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (CujoDeSockpuppet) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
Harry Lime has been posting on Usenet newsgroups for 20
years but still doesn't understand how they work.
I know how to use Usenet newsgroups which is the
point of this discussion.
HTH and HAND.
can't produce message-IDs for decades
Not really, I just never have seen a reason to bother.
HTH and HAND.
PJR called you a thieving liar
That was a standard troll line of PJR, already disproven a dozen
times, which he'd use to deflect the conversation.
Usually it was his lies about the theft of MY poem "Karma Bombs."
Debate that with PJR, nitwit. If he says you did it
PJR isn't that stupid, he just knew that every time he posted that lie, I'd have to correct him.
Finally I decided to stop arguing with him about it every time.
And so it goes.
From who keeps obsessively following up over a posts about you picking your nose, you sure gave up easy on something of consequence
Will Dockery wrote:
kfries@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (CujoDeSockpuppet) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet wrot
Will Dockery wrote:
Miguel Sucio wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
George J. Dance wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
Hi Retro Guy. Would it be possible for NovaBBS to "quote" the post that >> we're responding to in the Message reply box?
Lacking the quoted text,
it's difficult to address multiple questions raised in some of the
longer posts.
Yes, Harry Michael. It would be possible and it is possible. If you
want to know how, ask nicely - don't blame RetroGuy for your own
ignorance.
Harry Lime has been posting on Usenet newsgroups for 20 years but still
doesn't understand how they work.
Funny, coming from someone so technically challenged
Either way, I know how to use Usenet newsgroups which is the point of
this discussion.
HTH and HAND.
can't produce message-IDs for decades
Not really, I just never have seen a reason to bother.
HTH and HAND.
PJR called you a thieving liar
PJR hss called a lot of people that.
He's never had any proof for these false accusations and I've stopped arguing with him everytime he posts that obvious lie.
But you agreed
kfries@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (CujoDeSockpuppet) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
kfries@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (CujoDeSockpuppet) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet wrot
Will Dockery wrote:
Miguel Sucio wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
George J. Dance wrote:
HarryLime wrote:
Hi Retro Guy. Would it be possible for NovaBBS to "quote" the
post that we're responding to in the Message reply box?
Lacking the quoted text,
it's difficult to address multiple questions raised in some of the
longer posts.
Yes, Harry Michael. It would be possible and it is possible. If
you want to know how, ask nicely - don't blame RetroGuy for your
own ignorance.
Harry Lime has been posting on Usenet newsgroups for 20 years but
still doesn't understand how they work.
Funny, coming from someone so technically challenged
Either way, I know how to use Usenet newsgroups which is the point
of this discussion.
HTH and HAND.
can't produce message-IDs for decades
Not really, I just never have seen a reason to bother.
HTH and HAND.
PJR called you a thieving liar
PJR hss called a lot of people that.
He's never had any proof for these false accusations and I've
stopped arguing with him everytime he posts that obvious lie.
But you agreed that you were a theiving liar to kiss his ass,
Douchebag.
"Good call" - Dreckweasel agrees he's a thieving liar!
No, I didn't agree, I stopped responding to his face accusations.
Will Dockery <user3274@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote in news:1751122194-3274@newsgrouper.org:
kfries@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (CujoDeSockpuppet) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
kfries@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (CujoDeSockpuppet) posted:
PJR called you a thieving liar
PJR hss called a lot of people that.
He's never had any proof for these false accusations and I've
stopped arguing with him everytime he posts that obvious lie.
But you agreed
No, I didn't agree, I stopped responding to his false accusations.
I didn't know about PHJR accusing your face. Message-ID?
What did he accuse your face of doing?
Will Dockery wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
PJR called you a thieving liar
The same Bullsh*t PJR has said about me and others for twenty years.
That was a standard troll line of PJR, already disproven a dozen
times, which he'd use to deflect the conversation.
Usually it was his lies about the theft of MY poem "Karma Bombs."
Debate that with PJR, nitwit. If he says you did it
PJR isn't that stupid, he just knew that every time he posted that
lie, I'd have to correct him.
Finally I decided to stop arguing with him about it every time.
And so it goes.
The argument began in 2003. I've proven that I'm correct over and
over and can do it again over and over but everyone here should
already know the "Karma Bombs" story.
I suppose next time PJR returns we can go over the same Karma Bombs
flame war one more time, we've only been going over it for 22 years,
now
We'll see.
I chose not to respond to his trolling me about it.
Over the past 22 years the story of how Michael Cook stole the Karma
Bombs poem from me has been retold many times.
I'm surprised you claim to not know about it
I do know about it
CujoDeSockpuppet wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet wrote:
PJR called you a thieving liar
That was a standard troll line of PJR, already disproven a dozen
times, which he'd use to deflect the conversation.
Usually it was his lies about the theft of MY poem "Karma Bombs."
Debate that with PJR
PJR isn't that stupid, he just knew that every time he posted that lie,
I'd have to correct him.
Finally I decided to stop arguing with him about it every time.
And so it goes.
is afraid of PHJR
W.Dockery wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 16:26:44 +0000, % wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 18:54:16 +0000, NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 11:58:26 +0000, NancyGene wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet wrote:
PJR called you
I stopped responding to his false accusation.
That was a standard troll line of PJR, already disproven a dozen >>>>>> times, which he'd use to deflect the conversation.
Usually it was his lies about the theft of MY poem "Karma Bombs." >>>>>>
Debate that with PJR
PJR isn't that stupid, he just knew that every time he posted that >>>>>> lie,
I'd have to correct him.
Finally I decided to stop arguing with him about it every time.
And so it goes.
is afraid of PHJR
Of course you're the one who hides when PJR returns, NancyGene, not >>>>> me.
That right there is a lie
I don't think so.
You've always avoided PJR because he has you pegged as an obsessive
stalker troll from the start.
HTH and HAND.
is he saying pjr is nancy gene
I never thought about that but I'm thinking probably not.
NancyGene came to the poetry newsgroups stalking Stephan Pickering, who came from the Bob Dylan newsgroup.
After Stephan Pickering passed away NG stayed and teamed up with Michael Pendragon, Jim Senetto and other malicious trolls, who mainly just vandalized the group with flaming and other malicious attacks.
Even PJR seems to think NancyGene is creepy.
And so it goes.
well , she is
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
kfries@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (CujoDeSockpuppet) posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
Harry Lime has been posting on Usenet newsgroups for 20 years but
still
doesn't understand how they work.
I know how to use Usenet newsgroups which is the point of
this discussion.
HTH and HAND.
can't produce message-IDs for decades
Not really, I just never have seen a reason to bother.
I've never seen a reason to bother.
HTH and HAND.
Right, so when you make claims and are asked for evidence you don't >>>>> have
If I make claims I'll look for evidence and usually find it.
For example, the questions about Ahmos Zu-Bolton, all answered with
evidence.
The Everly Brothers questions also all answered with evidence.
To give two examples.
The evidence I provided in the abyss two cases proved myWe are not going to descend into the abyss to see your "evidence."
point both times.
--who's , " we "
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 18:09:52 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:
I tried posting on JLA, and ran into that problem in my first post. I
decided to not use them for another reason - they won't post usenet
messages with web links (other than to JLA, of course) - but seeing how
they butcher threads gave me another reason to avoid them.
There are large gaps in the archives of JLA Forums also, unfortunately.
I found this out when making a post by post search through various
years, 2004-2008 and so on, and found many of my threads are missing.
Will Dockery wrote:
kfries@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (CujoDeSockpuppet) posted:
Will
fears words
Thus from Cujo, who is either afraid or ashamed to post his alleged poetry on the newsgroup, he's even afraid to give a title or post a link to any poetry he claims he's written.
Knowing his jeering ilk, though, that's absolutely no surprise.
he retreats into a fantasy that something doesn’t exist
I told you that PHJR criticized it.
confused,
need
correcting.
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 12:40:02 +0000, Will Dockery wrote:
NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 11:58:26 +0000, NancyGene wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
I stopped responding to his false accusation.
That was a standard troll line of PJR, already disproven a dozen
times, which he'd use to deflect the conversation.
Usually it was his lies about the theft of MY poem "Karma Bombs."
Debate that with PJR
PJR isn't that stupid, he just knew that every time he posted that lie, >>>> I'd have to correct him.
Finally I decided to stop arguing with him about it every time.
And so it goes.
is afraid of PHJR
Of course you're the one who hides when PJR returns, NancyGene, not me.
That right there is a lie,
No, it's my observation.
Next time PJR shows up, let's see what you do.
PHJR is
This is a response to the post seen at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=680754858#680754858
Your (Will) observation is wrong.
Why would we address PHJR if
he has us blocked? Unlike you, we don't need to comment in every
thread. We are also not the unofficial greeter that you seem to want to
be for any unknowns who happen to show up on AAPC, usually cross-posted.
--
Will Dockery wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 16:26:44 +0000, % wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 18:54:16 +0000, NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 11:58:26 +0000, NancyGene wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
I stopped responding to his false accusation.
That was a standard troll line of PJR, already disproven a dozen >>>>>> times, which he'd use to deflect the conversation.
Usually it was his lies about the theft of MY poem "Karma Bombs." >>>>>>
Debate that with PJR
PJR isn't that stupid, he just knew that every time he posted that >>>>>> lie,
I'd have to correct him.
Finally I decided to stop arguing with him about it every time.
And so it goes.
is afraid of PHJR
Of course you're the one who hides when PJR returns, NancyGene, not >>>>> me.
That right there is a lie
I don't think so.
You've always avoided PJR because he has you pegged as an obsessive
stalker troll from the start.
HTH and HAND.
is he saying pjr is nancy gene
I never thought about that but I'm thinking probably not.
NancyGene came to the poetry newsgroups stalking Stephan Pickering, who came from the Bob Dylan newsgroup.
After Stephan Pickering passed away NG stayed and teamed up with Michael Pendragon, Jim Senetto and other malicious trolls, who mainly just vandalized the group with flaming and other malicious attacks.
Even PJR seems to think NancyGene is creepy.
And so it goes.
well , she is
will.dockery@gmail.com (W.Dockery) wrote in news:a62da32ab049922ab605a69c4b5758e6@www.novabbs.com:
confused,
need
correcting.
PS: The SnipKu
W.Dockery wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 16:26:44 +0000, % wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 18:54:16 +0000, NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 11:58:26 +0000, NancyGene wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet wrote:
PJR called you
I stopped responding to his false accusation.
That was a standard troll line of PJR, already disproven a dozen >>>>>> times, which he'd use to deflect the conversation.
Usually it was his lies about the theft of MY poem "Karma Bombs." >>>>>>
Debate that with PJR
PJR isn't that stupid, he just knew that every time he posted that >>>>>> lie,
I'd have to correct him.
Finally I decided to stop arguing with him about it every time.
And so it goes.
is afraid of PHJR
Of course you're the one who hides when PJR returns, NancyGene, not >>>>> me.
That right there is a lie
I don't think so.
You've always avoided PJR because he has you pegged as an obsessive
stalker troll from the start.
HTH and HAND.
is he saying pjr is nancy gene
I never thought about that but I'm thinking probably not.
NancyGene came to the poetry newsgroups stalking Stephan Pickering, who came from the Bob Dylan newsgroup.
After Stephan Pickering passed away NG stayed and teamed up with Michael Pendragon, Jim Senetto and other malicious trolls, who mainly just vandalized the group with flaming and other malicious attacks.
Even PJR seems to think NancyGene is creepy.
And so it goes.
well , she is
Will Dockery wrote:
% <pursent100@gmail.com> posted:
W.Dockery wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 16:26:44 +0000, % wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 18:54:16 +0000, NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 11:58:26 +0000, NancyGene wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet wrote:
PJR called you
I stopped responding to his false accusation.
That was a standard troll line of PJR, already disproven a dozen >>>>>>>> times, which he'd use to deflect the conversation.
Usually it was his lies about the theft of MY poem "Karma Bombs." >>>>>>>>
Debate that with PJR
PJR isn't that stupid, he just knew that every time he posted that >>>>>>>> lie,
I'd have to correct him.
Finally I decided to stop arguing with him about it every time. >>>>>>>>
And so it goes.
is afraid of PHJR
Of course you're the one who hides when PJR returns, NancyGene, not >>>>>>> me.
That right there is a lie
I don't think so.
You've always avoided PJR because he has you pegged as an obsessive >>>>> stalker troll from the start.
HTH and HAND.
is he saying pjr is nancy gene
I never thought about that but I'm thinking probably not.
NancyGene came to the poetry newsgroups stalking Stephan Pickering, who >>> came from the Bob Dylan newsgroup.
After Stephan Pickering passed away NG stayed and teamed up with Michael >>> Pendragon, Jim Senetto and other malicious trolls, who mainly just
vandalized the group with flaming and other malicious attacks.
Even PJR seems to think NancyGene is creepy.
And so it goes.
well , she is
Stalker trolls can get that way
she's lonely and she wants you
Will Dockery wrote:
% <pursent100@gmail.com> posted:
Will Dockery wrote:
she's lonely and she wants you
% <pursent100@gmail.com> posted:
W.Dockery wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 16:26:44 +0000, % wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 18:54:16 +0000, NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 11:58:26 +0000, NancyGene wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet wrote:
PJR called you
I stopped responding to his false accusation.
That was a standard troll line of PJR, already disproven a dozen >>>>>>>>>> times, which he'd use to deflect the conversation.
Usually it was his lies about the theft of MY poem "Karma Bombs." >>>>>>>>>>
Debate that with PJR
PJR isn't that stupid, he just knew that every time he posted that >>>>>>>>>> lie,
I'd have to correct him.
Finally I decided to stop arguing with him about it every time. >>>>>>>>>>
And so it goes.
is afraid of PHJR
Of course you're the one who hides when PJR returns, NancyGene, not >>>>>>>>> me.
That right there is a lie
I don't think so.
You've always avoided PJR because he has you pegged as an obsessive >>>>>>> stalker troll from the start.
HTH and HAND.
is he saying pjr is nancy gene
I never thought about that but I'm thinking probably not.
NancyGene came to the poetry newsgroups stalking Stephan Pickering, who >>>>> came from the Bob Dylan newsgroup.
After Stephan Pickering passed away NG stayed and teamed up with Michael
Pendragon, Jim Senetto and other malicious trolls, who mainly just >>>>> vandalized the group with flaming and other malicious attacks.
Even PJR seems to think NancyGene is creepy.
And so it goes.
well , she is
Stalker trolls can get that way
She sure has an odd way of showing it.
but look how well it works in getting your attention
Will Dockery wrote:
% <pursent100@gmail.com> posted:
W.Dockery wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 16:26:44 +0000, % wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 18:54:16 +0000, NancyGene wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 11:58:26 +0000, NancyGene wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
CujoDeSockpuppet wrote:
PJR called you
I stopped responding to his false accusation.
That was a standard troll line of PJR, already disproven a dozen >>>>>>>> times, which he'd use to deflect the conversation.
Usually it was his lies about the theft of MY poem "Karma Bombs." >>>>>>>>
Debate that with PJR
PJR isn't that stupid, he just knew that every time he posted that >>>>>>>> lie,
I'd have to correct him.
Finally I decided to stop arguing with him about it every time. >>>>>>>>
And so it goes.
is afraid of PHJR
Of course you're the one who hides when PJR returns, NancyGene, not >>>>>>> me.
That right there is a lie
I don't think so.
You've always avoided PJR because he has you pegged as an obsessive >>>>> stalker troll from the start.
HTH and HAND.
is he saying pjr is nancy gene
I never thought about that but I'm thinking probably not.
NancyGene came to the poetry newsgroups stalking Stephan Pickering, who >>> came from the Bob Dylan newsgroup.
After Stephan Pickering passed away NG stayed and teamed up with Michael >>> Pendragon, Jim Senetto and other malicious trolls, who mainly just
vandalized the group with flaming and other malicious attacks.
Even PJR seems to think NancyGene is creepy.
And so it goes.
well , she is
Stalker trolls can get that way
she's lonely and she wants you
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
| Uptime: | 06:16:13 |
| Calls: | 10,388 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 14,061 |
| Messages: | 6,416,808 |
| Posted today: | 1 |