In article <tv1lcd$1uicf$1@dont-email.me>,
SneedTheFeed <ManualNidal56@proton.me> wrote:

Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:

In article <51fbfdaa-c6a2-4635-b258-21e8081a3ee9n@googlegroups.com>,
T987654321 <qwrtz123@gmail.com> wrote:

Grosses
DOMESTIC (30.8%)
$134,000,000
INTERNATIONAL (69.2%)
$300,500,000
WORLDWIDE
$434,500,000

Seems that people like it this and Top Gun will let a lot of theaters
stay around another year.

Which was totally not what I asked.

The movie looks very nice. Not as breathtaking as the 1st one simply
because it looks the same in terms of visuals. I watched it in 3D and it
looked nice. I didn't think it looked particualry "better" than anything
else when it comes to 3D but again, can 3D even get better nowadays?

It seems like to only progress 3D movies can make now is in terms of
environment, story etc, not technique. And the environment in Avatar 2
is IMO very very cool. I would recommend you watch it, it's one of the
only worthwhile movies screening right now

I've heard enough good stuff now that I hope to do so before it
exits the theaters (though not in 3D). It's just tough to block out
that much time.

Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:

In article<51fbfdaa-c6a2-4635-b258-21e8081a3ee9n@googlegroups.com>, T987654321 <qwrtz123@gmail.com> wrote:

Grosses
DOMESTIC (30.8%)
$134,000,000
INTERNATIONAL (69.2%)
$300,500,000
WORLDWIDE
$434,500,000

Seems that people like it this and Top Gun will let a lot of theaters stay around another year.

Which was totally not what I asked.

The movie looks very nice. Not as breathtaking as the 1st one simply
because it looks the same in terms of visuals. I watched it in 3D and it looked nice. I didn't think it looked particualry "better" than anything
else when it comes to 3D but again, can 3D even get better nowadays?

It seems like to only progress 3D movies can make now is in terms of environment, story etc, not technique. And the environment in Avatar 2
is IMO very very cool. I would recommend you watch it, it's one of the
only worthwhile movies screening right now

In article <tv1lcd$1uicf$1...@dont-email.me>,
SneedTheFeed <Manual...@proton.me> wrote:

Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:

In article <51fbfdaa-c6a2-4635...@googlegroups.com>,
T987654321 <qwrt...@gmail.com> wrote:

Grosses
DOMESTIC (30.8%)
$134,000,000
INTERNATIONAL (69.2%)
$300,500,000
WORLDWIDE
$434,500,000

Seems that people like it this and Top Gun will let a lot of theaters >>> stay around another year.

Which was totally not what I asked.

The movie looks very nice. Not as breathtaking as the 1st one simply >because it looks the same in terms of visuals. I watched it in 3D and it >looked nice. I didn't think it looked particualry "better" than anything >else when it comes to 3D but again, can 3D even get better nowadays?

It seems like to only progress 3D movies can make now is in terms of >environment, story etc, not technique. And the environment in Avatar 2
is IMO very very cool. I would recommend you watch it, it's one of the >only worthwhile movies screening right now

I've heard enough good stuff now that I hope to do so before it
exits the theaters (though not in 3D). It's just tough to block out
that much time.
--
columbiaclosings.com
What's not in Columbia anymore..

I got through 1 hour of the dvd . I guess cartoon plots spoil my interest. I'll try the rest during winter.