• Re: Kimball Kinnison and Competition

    From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to Chris Buckley on Mon Nov 27 11:00:17 2023
    On 23 Nov 2023 03:01:13 GMT, Chris Buckley <alan@sabir.com> wrote:

    I've watched a fair number of Chinese American kids grow from age 6 to
    16. My exercise sport is table tennis, and my club has a large,
    excellent kids program which is probably 2/3 Chinese American. Some
    of the kids felt large stress/pressure at times. But it was almost all >self-imposed (though perhaps indirectly imposed by parents). It was the kids >saying "if I'm going to do this, I'm going to try my best and I know I
    can do better than this."


    As someone involved in organization of chess events I see very much of
    the same. Now we DO have strict conduct rules during tournaments but overwhelmingly the problem people are the parents not the kids (other
    than that kids tend to be rambunctuous and can be noisy which is not a
    problem except when they're downto the last 10 players to finish in
    the round)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Horny Goat@21:1/5 to psperson@old.netcom.invalid on Mon Nov 27 11:05:23 2023
    On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 08:50:54 -0800, Paul S Person
    <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:

    On 23 Nov 2023 04:09:54 GMT, Chris Buckley <alan@sabir.com> wrote:

    On 2023-11-23, Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
    On 11/22/2023 7:01 PM, Chris Buckley wrote:
    <snippo>
    Chinese fantasy webnovels, in general, agree with E.E.Smith's belief
    that stress is essential to growth.

    From personal experience stress is NOT essential to growth. Enough
    stress will actually retard growth in the real world and cause real harm >>> both mentally and physically.

    I would agree that enough stress will do that in real life. The Chinese >>answer in these webnovels seems to be:
    1. The ability to manage stress can and must be trained.
    2. If you can't manage the stress, you're not the main character or a
    MC friend. The fatality rate for non-MCs is very high!

    Point 1 is not unreasonable. To not learn to manage stress is to not
    learn a very useful life skill.

    But there is the saying

    If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.

    which implies that an alternative exists to remaining under stress.
    This would probably be in contrast with the attitude in your point 2.

    As to the topic:
    I don't like sports, but, really, how can team sports not be
    competitive, at least when more than one school is putting up a team?

    Even Chess is competitive, when found in tournement form.


    What do you mean EVEN - it is common in chess for a 4-5 hour game to
    be determined on the basis of an error made by one player within
    seconds - as opposed to baseball or basketball where you can always
    make back the score the other team has made in the later part of the
    game.

    In chess it is common for defeat to come almost entirely due to errors
    made 2-3 hours previous.


    OTOH, when my workgroup ("team") won second place in a
    decorate-the-workplace contest, I was not thrilled at their idea of
    marching around loudly proclaiming "We're No. 2". This is something to
    be proud of?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Dorsey@21:1/5 to lcraver@home.ca on Wed Nov 29 23:00:54 2023
    The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:

    In chess it is common for defeat to come almost entirely due to errors
    made 2-3 hours previous.


    It's a dangerous game, too. Those marble boards can hurt your head badly.
    I had a friend who had to have a pawn surgically removed from his ear.
    --scott
    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul S Person@21:1/5 to All on Thu Nov 30 09:08:53 2023
    On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 11:05:23 -0800, The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 08:50:54 -0800, Paul S Person ><psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:

    On 23 Nov 2023 04:09:54 GMT, Chris Buckley <alan@sabir.com> wrote:

    On 2023-11-23, Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
    On 11/22/2023 7:01 PM, Chris Buckley wrote:
    <snippo>
    Chinese fantasy webnovels, in general, agree with E.E.Smith's belief >>>>> that stress is essential to growth.

    From personal experience stress is NOT essential to growth. Enough
    stress will actually retard growth in the real world and cause real harm >>>> both mentally and physically.

    I would agree that enough stress will do that in real life. The Chinese >>>answer in these webnovels seems to be:
    1. The ability to manage stress can and must be trained.
    2. If you can't manage the stress, you're not the main character or a
    MC friend. The fatality rate for non-MCs is very high!

    Point 1 is not unreasonable. To not learn to manage stress is to not
    learn a very useful life skill.

    But there is the saying

    If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.

    which implies that an alternative exists to remaining under stress.
    This would probably be in contrast with the attitude in your point 2.

    As to the topic:
    I don't like sports, but, really, how can team sports not be
    competitive, at least when more than one school is putting up a team?

    Even Chess is competitive, when found in tournement form.


    What do you mean EVEN - it is common in chess for a 4-5 hour game to
    be determined on the basis of an error made by one player within
    seconds - as opposed to baseball or basketball where you can always
    make back the score the other team has made in the later part of the
    game.

    In chess it is common for defeat to come almost entirely due to errors
    made 2-3 hours previous.

    I suppose I should clarify: when I played chess, I played it with
    friends for enjoyment, not with rivals for prizes.

    So I think of chess, as such, as not competitive. Although you are
    correct, in more organized contexts it certainly is.
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Buckley@21:1/5 to Chris Buckley on Fri Dec 1 12:03:28 2023
    On 2023-11-23, Chris Buckley <alan@sabir.com> wrote:
    On 2023-11-12, Andrew McDowell <mcdowell_ag@sky.com> wrote:
    I have been re-reading E.E.Smith's Lensman series, with an eye to two recurring motifs. Smith's heroes are intensely competitive, driven, men. Their tools and weapons are kept in perfect working order, but not polished for display; they bear the scars
    and signs of repeated hard use. The two are linked; the drive for competitive success (within the rules) focusses attention on all and only those activities necessary for success. "Children of the Lens" emphasises a third element - personal growth occurs
    only in response to stress; the situations necessary for growth are necessarily unpleasant (and may involve admitting to and learning from mistakes).

    Is this emphasis on competition out of date? I grew up at the start of a period when the educational establishment was working hard to stamp out competition, most notably from school sports. In the UK, parents disliked this to the point of ridiculing
    it. Our current government (perhaps soon to be replaced) has tried to support competition, but it is difficult for me to see how competition is consistent with an academic crusade against inequality, so I expect the struggle against competition to resume.

    If there has been an effort to erase competition from education, the result does not seem to have been an improvement in the mental resilience of those currently leaving education and entering work. Could E.E.Smith's enthusiasm for competition have
    been justified?

    Nice topic. I'm going to break my response into several messages/aspects to (somewhat) avoid a wall of text (addressing mental aspects later).

    Sorry for the delay in posting more - my first joust with Covid interfered. Message 2 of 3 or 4.

    Even without organized competition, kids compete constantly, both then
    and now. It may not be explicit but things like clothes, or friends,
    or parties are constantly evaluated and compared.

    We occasionally put on our rose-colored glasses when thinking about
    these past competitions - how simple they were and how stress-free
    compared to adult worries. But that's just false. Everything back
    then was funneling into our building of our self-identity; what we
    believed; what we valued. This was something we did not have yet. All
    these things were intensely stressful and vital and necessary to build
    our mental health.

    So I think the organized academic and sports competitions of the past
    were just one facet of competitions. Overall, I would say they were
    valuable, as long as you could keep the parents not too involved. But
    what we've lost as those organized competitions have diminished is
    some of the ability of educators who controlled those competitions
    (including grades) to emphasize what's important and lessons learned.

    Chris

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jay E. Morris@21:1/5 to Paul S Person on Sat Dec 9 09:52:38 2023
    On 11/30/2023 11:08 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 11:05:23 -0800, The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 08:50:54 -0800, Paul S Person
    <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:

    On 23 Nov 2023 04:09:54 GMT, Chris Buckley <alan@sabir.com> wrote:

    On 2023-11-23, Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
    On 11/22/2023 7:01 PM, Chris Buckley wrote:
    <snippo>
    Chinese fantasy webnovels, in general, agree with E.E.Smith's belief >>>>>> that stress is essential to growth.

    From personal experience stress is NOT essential to growth. Enough >>>>> stress will actually retard growth in the real world and cause real harm >>>>> both mentally and physically.

    I would agree that enough stress will do that in real life. The Chinese >>>> answer in these webnovels seems to be:
    1. The ability to manage stress can and must be trained.
    2. If you can't manage the stress, you're not the main character or a
    MC friend. The fatality rate for non-MCs is very high!

    Point 1 is not unreasonable. To not learn to manage stress is to not
    learn a very useful life skill.

    But there is the saying

    If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.

    which implies that an alternative exists to remaining under stress.
    This would probably be in contrast with the attitude in your point 2.

    As to the topic:
    I don't like sports, but, really, how can team sports not be
    competitive, at least when more than one school is putting up a team?

    Even Chess is competitive, when found in tournement form.


    What do you mean EVEN - it is common in chess for a 4-5 hour game to
    be determined on the basis of an error made by one player within
    seconds - as opposed to baseball or basketball where you can always
    make back the score the other team has made in the later part of the
    game.

    In chess it is common for defeat to come almost entirely due to errors
    made 2-3 hours previous.

    I suppose I should clarify: when I played chess, I played it with
    friends for enjoyment, not with rivals for prizes.

    So I think of chess, as such, as not competitive. Although you are
    correct, in more organized contexts it certainly is.

    Must have had a different style of friends than I had. The enjoyment was
    to crush your opponent, see him driven before you, and to hear the
    lamentations of his...well, on the off chance he had a woman you'd hear
    her lamentations.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul S Person@21:1/5 to morrisj@epsilon3.comcon on Sat Dec 9 08:52:06 2023
    On Sat, 9 Dec 2023 09:52:38 -0600, "Jay E. Morris"
    <morrisj@epsilon3.comcon> wrote:

    On 11/30/2023 11:08 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 11:05:23 -0800, The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 08:50:54 -0800, Paul S Person
    <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:

    On 23 Nov 2023 04:09:54 GMT, Chris Buckley <alan@sabir.com> wrote:

    On 2023-11-23, Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:
    On 11/22/2023 7:01 PM, Chris Buckley wrote:
    <snippo>
    Chinese fantasy webnovels, in general, agree with E.E.Smith's belief >>>>>>> that stress is essential to growth.

    From personal experience stress is NOT essential to growth. Enough >>>>>> stress will actually retard growth in the real world and cause real harm >>>>>> both mentally and physically.

    I would agree that enough stress will do that in real life. The Chinese >>>>> answer in these webnovels seems to be:
    1. The ability to manage stress can and must be trained.
    2. If you can't manage the stress, you're not the main character or a >>>>> MC friend. The fatality rate for non-MCs is very high!

    Point 1 is not unreasonable. To not learn to manage stress is to not
    learn a very useful life skill.

    But there is the saying

    If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.

    which implies that an alternative exists to remaining under stress.
    This would probably be in contrast with the attitude in your point 2.

    As to the topic:
    I don't like sports, but, really, how can team sports not be
    competitive, at least when more than one school is putting up a team?

    Even Chess is competitive, when found in tournement form.


    What do you mean EVEN - it is common in chess for a 4-5 hour game to
    be determined on the basis of an error made by one player within
    seconds - as opposed to baseball or basketball where you can always
    make back the score the other team has made in the later part of the
    game.

    In chess it is common for defeat to come almost entirely due to errors
    made 2-3 hours previous.

    I suppose I should clarify: when I played chess, I played it with
    friends for enjoyment, not with rivals for prizes.

    So I think of chess, as such, as not competitive. Although you are
    correct, in more organized contexts it certainly is.

    Must have had a different style of friends than I had. The enjoyment was
    to crush your opponent, see him driven before you, and to hear the >lamentations of his...well, on the off chance he had a woman you'd hear
    her lamentations.

    Except for the guy I helped train, I mostly won. But, while I found
    that satisfying, I don't think I boasted overmuch, as I sometimes
    lost.

    My favorite opening was with the Knights. Even as Black. With White, I sometimes had the fun of a Four Knights opening. This was with the
    more thoughtful players.

    In other contexts, the players were for action. These games were very
    fast, and usually ended up with 8-10 major pieces clustered together,
    producing a puzzle: how to even find a move (that isn't a form a
    retreat), never mind a safe move or a winning move.

    When I was a kid, I asked to go bowling on my birthday. I rolled
    mostly gutter balls. My score was 15. Everybody thought I should be
    unhappy -- but I wasn't: I wanted to go bowling and I /went/ bowling.
    How well I did was irrelevant; I was having fun.

    Competition has never made sense to me. If I really want to do
    something, I will do it. The "thing" generally affects nobody but
    myself. I may do it well or I may do it badly, but I don't really
    care.
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Duffy@21:1/5 to Andrew McDowell on Sat Dec 9 22:46:39 2023
    Andrew McDowell <mcdowell_ag@sky.com> wrote:
    I am not very competitive myself. I worked with a competitive chess
    player for a while. One day he told us of an unusual strategy he had
    been able to use. He noticed that his opponent had forgotten to flip
    over the chess clock after making his move, so he just sat there doing nothing but waiting and watching his opponent run himself into time
    trouble.

    Most players have won a game of speed chess this way - you sit there
    until their flag falls. Since time management is such a key part of
    chess, no-one feels bad about it. In fact, the other guy is thinking that
    you are in trouble because you are spending too much time on a move.

    Cheers, David Duffy,

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)