• Re: Does a series have to be complete to be good ?

    From Lynn McGuire@21:1/5 to Andrew McDowell on Mon Nov 27 13:36:22 2023
    On 11/27/2023 1:30 PM, Andrew McDowell wrote:
    On Monday, November 27, 2023 at 7:15:38 PM UTC, Lynn McGuire wrote:
    Does a series have to be complete to be good ? Many authors are guilty
    of this, John Ringo is definitely this. Of course, show business goes
    with the "always leave them hanging" phrase so incomplete series may not
    be bad.

    Lynn
    One of my favourite series is David Drake's RCN (Mundy/Leary) series, which tails off, partly because Drake seemed to have tired of or exhausted the possibilities of the main cast, and partly because Drake has retired from the business of writing
    novels due to ill health. I am not going to think any less of it because it does not end with all of the loose ends tied up. It does help that Drake declared (and I think succeeded) that every book in the series was written to be enjoyable as a stand-
    alone novel.

    Throughout the series we are reminded that start travel is risky, espcially star travel on the edge, impelled by military considerations, exploration, or sheer competitiveness. A few of the characters reflect that, given the life that they have chosen,
    the chances of them surviving long enough to worry about tapering off to a graceful retirement are not high. I sometimes consider that perhaps one day the RCN Princess Cecile lifted off from Cinnaber, transitioned to its high drive... and was simply
    never seen again.

    I like that. I have the last two of the RCN series in my SBR.

    Lynn

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew McDowell@21:1/5 to Lynn McGuire on Mon Nov 27 11:30:38 2023
    On Monday, November 27, 2023 at 7:15:38 PM UTC, Lynn McGuire wrote:
    Does a series have to be complete to be good ? Many authors are guilty
    of this, John Ringo is definitely this. Of course, show business goes
    with the "always leave them hanging" phrase so incomplete series may not
    be bad.

    Lynn
    One of my favourite series is David Drake's RCN (Mundy/Leary) series, which tails off, partly because Drake seemed to have tired of or exhausted the possibilities of the main cast, and partly because Drake has retired from the business of writing novels
    due to ill health. I am not going to think any less of it because it does not end with all of the loose ends tied up. It does help that Drake declared (and I think succeeded) that every book in the series was written to be enjoyable as a stand-alone
    novel.

    Throughout the series we are reminded that start travel is risky, espcially star travel on the edge, impelled by military considerations, exploration, or sheer competitiveness. A few of the characters reflect that, given the life that they have chosen,
    the chances of them surviving long enough to worry about tapering off to a graceful retirement are not high. I sometimes consider that perhaps one day the RCN Princess Cecile lifted off from Cinnaber, transitioned to its high drive... and was simply
    never seen again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lynn McGuire@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 27 13:15:32 2023
    Does a series have to be complete to be good ? Many authors are guilty
    of this, John Ringo is definitely this. Of course, show business goes
    with the "always leave them hanging" phrase so incomplete series may not
    be bad.

    Lynn

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Quadibloc@21:1/5 to Lynn McGuire on Mon Nov 27 13:29:03 2023
    On Monday, November 27, 2023 at 12:15:38 PM UTC-7, Lynn McGuire wrote:
    Does a series have to be complete to be good ?

    I tend to say YES.

    Actually, though, it depends on the type of series. If the series
    is episodic in nature, wherein it is composed of parts that are
    complete in themselves, then completion is less of an issue.

    Thus, the television series Star Trak was good, even though
    it ended after a short third season.

    Or the Barsoom novels and the Tarzan novels of Edgar Rice
    Burroughs. The first three Barsoom novels, and the first
    four Tarzan novels told a complete story - but after that,
    the remaining books were episodic, continuing on with the
    same characters.

    But when a series is constructed to tell a single story over
    a number of volumes, and it ends in the middle, this does
    cast a cloud over the reader's enjoyment.

    I mean, how does a typical story go?

    First, we get introduced to the characters - so that they
    seem like nice people we should care about.

    Then they face a problem! We feel sorry for them.

    They respond to the problem, and we are thrilled by the
    events of that struggle.

    And finally, they achieve victory, and we celebrate.

    If the author passes away before the story reaches the
    point of closure, then reading the story is an incomplete
    experience. Of course, going along for the ride in the earlier
    parts has to have been enjoyable, or the reader would have put the
    story down long before the end could be reached! But one of the
    main goals of reading a story can't be achieved.

    I do think therefore that it's kind of irresponsible - and a bit
    greedy too - for authors to write 12-book story arcs that are intended
    as duodecalogies, rather than a trilogy with episodic successors.

    Of course, LotR was really a *hexalogy*, as the anniversary paperback
    edition reminded us. But _he_ wrote the whole thing on spec in advance.

    John Savard

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Robert Carnegie@21:1/5 to Lynn McGuire on Mon Nov 27 16:45:00 2023
    On Monday, 27 November 2023 at 19:15:38 UTC, Lynn McGuire wrote:
    Does a series have to be complete to be good ? Many authors are guilty
    of this, John Ringo is definitely this. Of course, show business goes
    with the "always leave them hanging" phrase so incomplete series may not
    be bad.

    A series can have more than one author, though
    it isn't fashionable. I wonder if any commercial
    series with "house name" pseudonym still exists...
    of course there's the formula of "Very Famous
    Author collaborating With Cheaper Author Who
    Has Done Almost All The Writing". New James Bond
    books have been published quite recently.

    I quite liked Eoin Colfer's _And Another Thing..._,
    which picks up from _The Hitchhiker's Guide to
    the Galaxy_. I understand it to be a new original
    work. (New as in 2009.)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted Nolan @21:1/5 to rja.carnegie@excite.com on Tue Nov 28 01:19:30 2023
    In article <851fea24-f882-4ac0-80ff-08a4b44b3ea4n@googlegroups.com>,
    Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> wrote:

    A series can have more than one author, though
    it isn't fashionable. I wonder if any commercial
    series with "house name" pseudonym still exists...
    of course there's the formula of "Very Famous
    Author collaborating With Cheaper Author Who
    Has Done Almost All The Writing". New James Bond
    books have been published quite recently.


    New Doc Savage books are still credited to Kenneth
    Robeson, though there is no longer any effort
    to conceal the true author. As far as I am aware,
    new Tom Swift, Nancy Drew & Hardy Boys books are
    still done under the classic house names, though
    side projects like comics seem to get more real
    credits.
    --
    columbiaclosings.com
    What's not in Columbia anymore..

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ahasuerus@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 27 18:01:56 2023
    On Monday, November 27, 2023 at 8:19:35 PM UTC-5, Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote: [snip-snip]
    New Doc Savage books are still credited to Kenneth
    Robeson, though there is no longer any effort
    to conceal the true author. As far as I am aware,
    new Tom Swift, Nancy Drew & Hardy Boys books are
    still done under the classic house names, though
    side projects like comics seem to get more real credits.

    A number of publishers who use house names have adopted a
    sort-of standard over the last few years. They add "Special
    thanks to John Doe" (where "John Doe" is the name of the author)
    to the copyright page . It makes bibliographers' lives much easier.
    (I suspect that it also makes lives easier for authors and
    publishers.)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lynn McGuire@21:1/5 to Lynn McGuire on Mon Nov 27 20:25:07 2023
    On 11/27/2023 1:15 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
    Does a series have to be complete to be good ?  Many authors are guilty
    of this, John Ringo is definitely this.  Of course, show business goes
    with the "always leave them hanging" phrase so incomplete series may not
    be bad.

    Lynn

    Somebody else reminded me of David Gerrold, how could I forget. Great
    series (Chtorr) with a severe cliffhanger and no book in almost 30 years
    now.

    Lynn

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael F. Stemper@21:1/5 to Lynn McGuire on Tue Nov 28 08:09:38 2023
    On 27/11/2023 13.15, Lynn McGuire wrote:
    Does a series have to be complete to be good ?

    Absolutely not. One example that comes to mind is the Vorkosiverse.
    It only had eight volumes when I first read it, and it was great
    even then. I still thought that it was great when I thought that
    LMB was done with it. Since that time, she's added _Cryoburn_,
    _Ivan's Alliance_, and _Gentleman Jolie_. These additions didn't
    make the first part retroactively suck.

    --
    Michael F. Stemper
    Nostalgia just ain't what it used to be.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From James Nicoll@21:1/5 to Michael F. Stemper on Tue Nov 28 14:24:21 2023
    In article <uk4sb2$a15l$1@dont-email.me>,
    Michael F. Stemper <michael.stemper@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 27/11/2023 13.15, Lynn McGuire wrote:
    Does a series have to be complete to be good ?

    Absolutely not. One example that comes to mind is the Vorkosiverse.
    It only had eight volumes when I first read it, and it was great
    even then. I still thought that it was great when I thought that
    LMB was done with it. Since that time, she's added _Cryoburn_,
    _Ivan's Alliance_, and _Gentleman Jolie_. These additions didn't
    make the first part retroactively suck.

    I think it's important to distinguish between proper series, each
    book of which works as a stand-alone, and abominations, in which
    one is buying fragments of a story with no guarantee (in fact,
    good odds against) of an actual resolution.
    --
    My reviews can be found at http://jamesdavisnicoll.com/
    My tor pieces at https://www.tor.com/author/james-davis-nicoll/
    My Dreamwidth at https://james-davis-nicoll.dreamwidth.org/
    My patreon is at https://www.patreon.com/jamesdnicoll

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Lurndal@21:1/5 to ted@loft.tnolan.com on Tue Nov 28 15:13:23 2023
    ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) writes:
    In article <851fea24-f882-4ac0-80ff-08a4b44b3ea4n@googlegroups.com>,
    Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> wrote:

    A series can have more than one author, though
    it isn't fashionable. I wonder if any commercial
    series with "house name" pseudonym still exists...
    of course there's the formula of "Very Famous
    Author collaborating With Cheaper Author Who
    Has Done Almost All The Writing". New James Bond
    books have been published quite recently.


    New Doc Savage books are still credited to Kenneth
    Robeson, though there is no longer any effort
    to conceal the true author. As far as I am aware,
    new Tom Swift, Nancy Drew & Hardy Boys books are
    still done under the classic house names, though
    side projects like comics seem to get more real
    credits.

    The Mack Bolan series is now up to #631. Right up Lynn's alley.

    Looks like it's had about 60 authors.

    There are still new books being published in
    _The Destroyer_ series (Remo Williams), and
    the original authors have been deceased since 2015.

    OBSF: One of the original Remo authors (Warren Murphy)
    co-wrote the modern arthurian adventure _The Forever King_.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Robert Carnegie@21:1/5 to Robert Carnegie on Tue Nov 28 12:23:54 2023
    On Tuesday, 28 November 2023 at 00:45:03 UTC, Robert Carnegie wrote:
    On Monday, 27 November 2023 at 19:15:38 UTC, Lynn McGuire wrote:
    Does a series have to be complete to be good ? Many authors are guilty
    of this, John Ringo is definitely this. Of course, show business goes
    with the "always leave them hanging" phrase so incomplete series may not
    be bad.
    A series can have more than one author, though
    it isn't fashionable. I wonder if any commercial
    series with "house name" pseudonym still exists...
    of course there's the formula of "Very Famous
    Author collaborating With Cheaper Author Who
    Has Done Almost All The Writing". New James Bond
    books have been published quite recently.

    I quite liked Eoin Colfer's _And Another Thing..._,
    which picks up from _The Hitchhiker's Guide to
    the Galaxy_. I understand it to be a new original
    work. (New as in 2009.)

    I meant to mention cases where a publisher
    and not an author cuts a series off. If that leaves
    an author considering finishing their story
    in another way for little or no payment, it's quite
    reasonable that they postpone that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lynn McGuire@21:1/5 to Scott Lurndal on Tue Nov 28 14:35:49 2023
    On 11/28/2023 9:13 AM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
    ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) writes:
    In article <851fea24-f882-4ac0-80ff-08a4b44b3ea4n@googlegroups.com>,
    Robert Carnegie <rja.carnegie@excite.com> wrote:

    A series can have more than one author, though
    it isn't fashionable. I wonder if any commercial
    series with "house name" pseudonym still exists...
    of course there's the formula of "Very Famous
    Author collaborating With Cheaper Author Who
    Has Done Almost All The Writing". New James Bond
    books have been published quite recently.


    New Doc Savage books are still credited to Kenneth
    Robeson, though there is no longer any effort
    to conceal the true author. As far as I am aware,
    new Tom Swift, Nancy Drew & Hardy Boys books are
    still done under the classic house names, though
    side projects like comics seem to get more real
    credits.

    The Mack Bolan series is now up to #631. Right up Lynn's alley.

    Looks like it's had about 60 authors.

    There are still new books being published in
    _The Destroyer_ series (Remo Williams), and
    the original authors have been deceased since 2015.

    OBSF: One of the original Remo authors (Warren Murphy)
    co-wrote the modern arthurian adventure _The Forever King_.

    No more long series for me. I've got 60 more English Perry Rhodans to
    reread in dead tree versions and another 1,200 English epubs. I am overwhelmed. My SBR is overfull.

    Lynn

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From petertrei@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Robert Carnegie on Tue Nov 28 14:30:11 2023
    On Tuesday, November 28, 2023 at 3:23:58 PM UTC-5, Robert Carnegie wrote:
    On Tuesday, 28 November 2023 at 00:45:03 UTC, Robert Carnegie wrote:
    On Monday, 27 November 2023 at 19:15:38 UTC, Lynn McGuire wrote:
    Does a series have to be complete to be good ? Many authors are guilty of this, John Ringo is definitely this. Of course, show business goes with the "always leave them hanging" phrase so incomplete series may not be bad.
    A series can have more than one author, though
    it isn't fashionable. I wonder if any commercial
    series with "house name" pseudonym still exists...
    of course there's the formula of "Very Famous
    Author collaborating With Cheaper Author Who
    Has Done Almost All The Writing". New James Bond
    books have been published quite recently.

    I quite liked Eoin Colfer's _And Another Thing..._,
    which picks up from _The Hitchhiker's Guide to
    the Galaxy_. I understand it to be a new original
    work. (New as in 2009.)
    I meant to mention cases where a publisher
    and not an author cuts a series off. If that leaves
    an author considering finishing their story
    in another way for little or no payment, it's quite
    reasonable that they postpone that.

    This happens more frequently in TV series.
    Even ones with closed end plots, and a known
    number of seasons at the start, are frequently
    cancelled mid-run.

    pt

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Default User@21:1/5 to James Nicoll on Wed Nov 29 09:34:33 2023
    James Nicoll wrote:

    I think it's important to distinguish between proper series, each
    book of which works as a stand-alone, and abominations, in which
    one is buying fragments of a story with no guarantee (in fact,
    good odds against) of an actual resolution.

    Sure. Another good example of the former is the Culture series. Not
    only are the books loosely coupled, but for the most part the books can
    be read in any order without too much problem. Few if any character
    appear in multiple books.

    The closest to a sequel really was Look to Windward, which built on the
    events of Consider Phlebas but was set well after it. In fact I read
    those in reverse order and didn't suffer for it.

    The Hydrogen Sonata made a brief mention of Excession, and if one
    hadn't read the latter that part might a bit unclear, but it the main
    idea was still clear.


    Brian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Default User@21:1/5 to James Nicoll on Wed Nov 29 09:35:35 2023
    James Nicoll wrote:

    I think it's important to distinguish between proper series, each
    book of which works as a stand-alone, and abominations, in which
    one is buying fragments of a story with no guarantee (in fact,
    good odds against) of an actual resolution.

    Sure. Another good example of the former is the Culture series. Not
    only are the books loosely coupled, but for the most part the books can
    be read in any order without too much problem. Few if any character
    appear in multiple books.

    The closest to a sequel really was Look to Windward, which built on the
    events of Consider Phlebas but was set well after it. In fact I read
    those in reverse order and didn't suffer for it.

    The Hydrogen Sonata made a brief mention of Excession, and if one
    hadn't read the latter that part might a bit unclear, but it the main
    idea was still clear.


    Brian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Christian Weisgerber@21:1/5 to Lynn McGuire on Wed Nov 29 21:50:42 2023
    On 2023-11-27, Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:

    Does a series have to be complete to be good ?

    You want to wait until _Perry Rhodan_ is finished??

    More seriously, from TV shows where the season-based production
    penalizes any longer term story arcs, I've come to the conclusion
    that often enough the journey *is* the destination.

    David Gerrold's unfinished _War Against the Chtorr_ series is very
    good, despite being another case where the author knew how to begin
    the story, but apparently not how to end it.

    Some series are just designed to be open-ended. Laurell K. Hamilton's
    _Anita Blake_ series wasn't going anywhere particular when I stopped
    reading.

    I thought I knew what John Norman had planned for a final _Gor_
    novel (fb boivbhfyl gur erghea bs Cn-Xhe, jubfr qrngu unq bayl orra
    vasreerq ng gur raq bs gur svefg abiry naq jubfr obql unq abg orra
    sbhaq), but I guess we're long past the point where this would have
    made sense or where he actually would have wanted to stop.

    --
    Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Moriarty@21:1/5 to Default User on Wed Nov 29 14:57:35 2023
    On Wednesday, November 29, 2023 at 8:41:47 PM UTC+11, Default User wrote:
    James Nicoll wrote:

    I think it's important to distinguish between proper series, each
    book of which works as a stand-alone, and abominations, in which
    one is buying fragments of a story with no guarantee (in fact,
    good odds against) of an actual resolution.

    Good odds against? You must be reading different series to me. Except for Rothfuss and Martin, who will never finish their respective series, pretty much every single-story series I've started has finished.

    Sure. Another good example of the former is the Culture series. Not
    only are the books loosely coupled, but for the most part the books can
    be read in any order without too much problem. Few if any character
    appear in multiple books.

    The closest to a sequel really was Look to Windward, which built on the events of Consider Phlebas but was set well after it. In fact I read
    those in reverse order and didn't suffer for it.

    The Hydrogen Sonata made a brief mention of Excession, and if one
    hadn't read the latter that part might a bit unclear, but it the main
    idea was still clear.

    Not to mention the very last word, literally, of "Surface Detail".

    -Moriarty

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lynn McGuire@21:1/5 to Christian Weisgerber on Wed Nov 29 18:43:19 2023
    On 11/29/2023 3:50 PM, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
    On 2023-11-27, Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:

    Does a series have to be complete to be good ?

    You want to wait until _Perry Rhodan_ is finished??

    More seriously, from TV shows where the season-based production
    penalizes any longer term story arcs, I've come to the conclusion
    that often enough the journey *is* the destination.

    David Gerrold's unfinished _War Against the Chtorr_ series is very
    good, despite being another case where the author knew how to begin
    the story, but apparently not how to end it.

    Some series are just designed to be open-ended. Laurell K. Hamilton's
    _Anita Blake_ series wasn't going anywhere particular when I stopped
    reading.

    I thought I knew what John Norman had planned for a final _Gor_
    novel (fb boivbhfyl gur erghea bs Cn-Xhe, jubfr qrngu unq bayl orra
    vasreerq ng gur raq bs gur svefg abiry naq jubfr obql unq abg orra
    sbhaq), but I guess we're long past the point where this would have
    made sense or where he actually would have wanted to stop.

    +1 on all accounts. Yes, the journey is the destination in many series.

    The problem with the Chtorr is that David Gerrold kept on teasing us
    with excerpts from book five. I am convinced that his son will publish whatever he finds when Gerrold passes on. Of course, Gerrold could just publish a novella finishing the chtorraforming of Earth and all the
    humans die rapidly.

    Lynn

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Default User@21:1/5 to James Nicoll on Fri Dec 1 07:00:31 2023
    James Nicoll wrote:

    I think it's important to distinguish between proper series, each
    book of which works as a stand-alone, and abominations, in which
    one is buying fragments of a story with no guarantee (in fact,
    good odds against) of an actual resolution.

    Sure. Another good example of the former is the Culture series. Not
    only are the books loosely coupled, but for the most part the books can
    be read in any order without too much problem. Few if any character
    appear in multiple books.

    The closest to a sequel really was Look to Windward, which built on the
    events of Consider Phlebas but was set well after it. In fact I read
    those in reverse order and didn't suffer for it.

    The Hydrogen Sonata made a brief mention of Excession, and if one
    hadn't read the latter that part might a bit unclear, but it the main
    idea was still clear.


    Brian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Christian Weisgerber@21:1/5 to Lynn McGuire on Fri Dec 1 19:18:44 2023
    On 2023-11-30, Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:

    The problem with the Chtorr is that David Gerrold kept on teasing us
    with excerpts from book five. I am convinced that his son will publish whatever he finds when Gerrold passes on. Of course, Gerrold could just publish a novella finishing the chtorraforming of Earth and all the
    humans die rapidly.

    But book five was no longer supposed to be the final one. At the
    end of book four there is an interview with Gerrold where he says
    the series will have at least seven books.

    --
    Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@21:1/5 to Christian Weisgerber on Fri Dec 1 15:26:34 2023
    On 12/1/2023 11:18 AM, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
    On 2023-11-30, Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:

    The problem with the Chtorr is that David Gerrold kept on teasing us
    with excerpts from book five. I am convinced that his son will publish
    whatever he finds when Gerrold passes on. Of course, Gerrold could just
    publish a novella finishing the chtorraforming of Earth and all the
    humans die rapidly.

    But book five was no longer supposed to be the final one. At the
    end of book four there is an interview with Gerrold where he says
    the series will have at least seven books.

    Apparently he failed math as 4 is less than 7. :P

    --
    I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
    dirty old man.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)