Trying to see.
Later today (22 Feb 2024) I'll have to make other arrangements.
Trying to see.
Later today (22 Feb 2024) I'll have to make other arrangements.
On 2/22/24 6:17 AM, WolfFan wrote:
On Feb 22, 2024, Kevrob wrote
(in article<01d546b3-815e-4438-90ef-7e6440f3f2aen@googlegroups.com>):
Trying to see.
Later today (22 Feb 2024) I'll have to make other arrangements.
the spammer is still kicking spam. The latest one that I saw, briefly, before
I nuked it, had a 06:11, my time, timestamp. I’m posting at 06:16.
I suspect that the spammer will continue right until Google pulls the plug. >>
Agreed - still spamming strong at 10:47am EST.
I have been wondering what Feb 22 actually means - since Google is based
in California, is it 8am their time? midnight their time? Pull (virtual)
ping pong balls out of a (virtual) hat until they pull the ball that
says stop now?
Tony
On 2/22/24 6:17 AM, WolfFan wrote:
On Feb 22, 2024, Kevrob wrote
(in article<01d546b3-815e-4438-90ef-7e6440f3f2aen@googlegroups.com>):
Trying to see.
Later today (22 Feb 2024) I'll have to make other arrangements.
the spammer is still kicking spam. The latest one that I saw, briefly, before
I nuked it, had a 06:11, my time, timestamp. I’m posting at 06:16.
I suspect that the spammer will continue right until Google pulls the plug.
Agreed - still spamming strong at 10:47am EST.
I have been wondering what Feb 22 actually means - since Google is based
in California, is it 8am their time? midnight their time? Pull (virtual)
ping pong balls out of a (virtual) hat until they pull the ball that
says stop now?
Tony
On Feb 22, 2024, Tony Nance wrote
(in article <ur7qbj$3uo50$1@dont-email.me>):
On 2/22/24 6:17 AM, WolfFan wrote:
On Feb 22, 2024, Kevrob wroteAgreed - still spamming strong at 10:47am EST.
(in article<01d546b3-815e-4438-90ef-7e6440f3f2aen@googlegroups.com>):
Trying to see.
Later today (22 Feb 2024) I'll have to make other arrangements.
the spammer is still kicking spam. The latest one that I saw, briefly,
before
I nuked it, had a 06:11, my time, timestamp. I’m posting at 06:16.
I suspect that the spammer will continue right until Google pulls the plug. >>
I have been wondering what Feb 22 actually means - since Google is based
in California, is it 8am their time? midnight their time? Pull (virtual)
ping pong balls out of a (virtual) hat until they pull the ball that
says stop now?
Tony
Well, Google pulled the plug. No more spam deluge, at least until he gets a new service.
What did he think that he was achieving? No-one could read his spams, everyone just killed them on sight, it was at most a minor inconvenience.
On 2/22/2024 5:03 PM, WolfFan wrote:
On Feb 22, 2024, Tony Nance wrote
(in article <ur7qbj$3uo50$1@dont-email.me>):
On 2/22/24 6:17 AM, WolfFan wrote:
On Feb 22, 2024, Kevrob wrote
(in article<01d546b3-815e-4438-90ef-7e6440f3f2aen@googlegroups.com>):
Trying to see.
Later today (22 Feb 2024) I'll have to make other arrangements.
the spammer is still kicking spam. The latest one that I saw, briefly, before
I nuked it, had a 06:11, my time, timestamp. I’m posting at 06:16.
I suspect that the spammer will continue right until Google pulls the plug.
Agreed - still spamming strong at 10:47am EST.
I have been wondering what Feb 22 actually means - since Google is based in California, is it 8am their time? midnight their time? Pull (virtual) ping pong balls out of a (virtual) hat until they pull the ball that
says stop now?
Tony
Well, Google pulled the plug. No more spam deluge, at least until he gets a new service.
What did he think that he was achieving? No-one could read his spams, everyone just killed them on sight, it was at most a minor inconvenience.They were ads that that person was getting paid 0.1 cents per ad sent?
On Feb 23, 2024, Dimensional Traveler wrote
(in article <ur9c66$clhj$3@dont-email.me>):
On 2/22/2024 5:03 PM, WolfFan wrote:
On Feb 22, 2024, Tony Nance wrote
(in article <ur7qbj$3uo50$1@dont-email.me>):
On 2/22/24 6:17 AM, WolfFan wrote:
On Feb 22, 2024, Kevrob wrote
(in article<01d546b3-815e-4438-90ef-7e6440f3f2aen@googlegroups.com>): >>>>>
Trying to see.
Later today (22 Feb 2024) I'll have to make other arrangements.
the spammer is still kicking spam. The latest one that I saw, briefly, >>>>> before
I nuked it, had a 06:11, my time, timestamp. I’m posting at 06:16. >>>>>
I suspect that the spammer will continue right until Google pulls the >>>>> plug.
Agreed - still spamming strong at 10:47am EST.
I have been wondering what Feb 22 actually means - since Google is based >>>> in California, is it 8am their time? midnight their time? Pull (virtual) >>>> ping pong balls out of a (virtual) hat until they pull the ball that
says stop now?
Tony
Well, Google pulled the plug. No more spam deluge, at least until he gets a >>> new service.
What did he think that he was achieving? No-one could read his spams,
everyone just killed them on sight, it was at most a minor inconvenience. >> They were ads that that person was getting paid 0.1 cents per ad sent?
extremely ineffective ads. not a good way to get a second project.
On 2/22/2024 5:03 PM, WolfFan wrote:
On Feb 22, 2024, Tony Nance wroteThey were ads that that person was getting paid 0.1 cents per ad sent?
(in article <ur7qbj$3uo50$1@dont-email.me>):
On 2/22/24 6:17 AM, WolfFan wrote:
On Feb 22, 2024, Kevrob wrote
(in article<01d546b3-815e-4438-90ef-7e6440f3f2aen@googlegroups.com>):
Trying to see.
Later today (22 Feb 2024) I'll have to make other arrangements.
the spammer is still kicking spam. The latest one that I saw, briefly, >>>> before
I nuked it, had a 06:11, my time, timestamp. I’m posting at 06:16.
I suspect that the spammer will continue right until Google pulls the plug.
Agreed - still spamming strong at 10:47am EST.
I have been wondering what Feb 22 actually means - since Google is based >>> in California, is it 8am their time? midnight their time? Pull (virtual) >>> ping pong balls out of a (virtual) hat until they pull the ball that
says stop now?
Tony
Well, Google pulled the plug. No more spam deluge, at least until he gets a >> new service.
What did he think that he was achieving? No-one could read his spams,
everyone just killed them on sight, it was at most a minor inconvenience.
On 2/23/2024 4:32 AM, WolfFan wrote:
On Feb 23, 2024, Dimensional Traveler wroteJunk snail mail is considered successful if it gets a 1% response rate. 2% is
(in article <ur9c66$clhj$3@dont-email.me>):
On 2/22/2024 5:03 PM, WolfFan wrote:
On Feb 22, 2024, Tony Nance wrote
(in article <ur7qbj$3uo50$1@dont-email.me>):
On 2/22/24 6:17 AM, WolfFan wrote:
On Feb 22, 2024, Kevrob wrote
(in article<01d546b3-815e-4438-90ef-7e6440f3f2aen@googlegroups.com>): >>>>>>
Trying to see.
Later today (22 Feb 2024) I'll have to make other arrangements.
the spammer is still kicking spam. The latest one that I saw, briefly, >>>>>> before
I nuked it, had a 06:11, my time, timestamp. I’m posting at 06:16. >>>>>>
I suspect that the spammer will continue right until Google pulls the >>>>>> plug.
Agreed - still spamming strong at 10:47am EST.
I have been wondering what Feb 22 actually means - since Google is based >>>>> in California, is it 8am their time? midnight their time? Pull (virtual) >>>>> ping pong balls out of a (virtual) hat until they pull the ball that >>>>> says stop now?
Tony
Well, Google pulled the plug. No more spam deluge, at least until he gets >>>> a
new service.
What did he think that he was achieving? No-one could read his spams,
everyone just killed them on sight, it was at most a minor inconvenience. >>> They were ads that that person was getting paid 0.1 cents per ad sent?
extremely ineffective ads. not a good way to get a second project.
wildly successful and snail mail costs. What costs are there for internet spam?
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
On 2/23/2024 4:32 AM, WolfFan wrote:
On Feb 23, 2024, Dimensional Traveler wroteJunk snail mail is considered successful if it gets a 1% response
(in article <ur9c66$clhj$3@dont-email.me>):
On 2/22/2024 5:03 PM, WolfFan wrote:
On Feb 22, 2024, Tony Nance wroteThey were ads that that person was getting paid 0.1 cents per ad sent?
(in article <ur7qbj$3uo50$1@dont-email.me>):
On 2/22/24 6:17 AM, WolfFan wrote:
On Feb 22, 2024, Kevrob wrote
(in
article<01d546b3-815e-4438-90ef-7e6440f3f2aen@googlegroups.com>): >>>>>>>
Trying to see.the spammer is still kicking spam. The latest one that I saw,
Later today (22 Feb 2024) I'll have to make other arrangements. >>>>>>>
briefly,
before
I nuked it, had a 06:11, my time, timestamp. I’m posting at 06:16. >>>>>>>
I suspect that the spammer will continue right until Google pulls >>>>>>> the
plug.
Agreed - still spamming strong at 10:47am EST.
I have been wondering what Feb 22 actually means - since Google is >>>>>> based
in California, is it 8am their time? midnight their time? Pull
(virtual)
ping pong balls out of a (virtual) hat until they pull the ball that >>>>>> says stop now?
Tony
Well, Google pulled the plug. No more spam deluge, at least until
he gets a
new service.
What did he think that he was achieving? No-one could read his spams, >>>>> everyone just killed them on sight, it was at most a minor
inconvenience.
extremely ineffective ads. not a good way to get a second project.
rate. 2% is wildly successful and snail mail costs. What costs are
there for internet spam?
Time?
On 2/23/2024 9:10 AM, D wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
On 2/23/2024 4:32 AM, WolfFan wrote:
On Feb 23, 2024, Dimensional Traveler wroteJunk snail mail is considered successful if it gets a 1% response rate. 2% >>> is wildly successful and snail mail costs. What costs are there for
(in article <ur9c66$clhj$3@dont-email.me>):
On 2/22/2024 5:03 PM, WolfFan wrote:extremely ineffective ads. not a good way to get a second project.
On Feb 22, 2024, Tony Nance wroteThey were ads that that person was getting paid 0.1 cents per ad sent? >>>>
(in article <ur7qbj$3uo50$1@dont-email.me>):
On 2/22/24 6:17 AM, WolfFan wrote:
On Feb 22, 2024, Kevrob wrote
(in article<01d546b3-815e-4438-90ef-7e6440f3f2aen@googlegroups.com>): >>>>>>>>
Trying to see.the spammer is still kicking spam. The latest one that I saw, >>>>>>>> briefly,
Later today (22 Feb 2024) I'll have to make other arrangements. >>>>>>>>
before
I nuked it, had a 06:11, my time, timestamp. I’m posting at 06:16. >>>>>>>>
I suspect that the spammer will continue right until Google pulls the >>>>>>>> plug.
Agreed - still spamming strong at 10:47am EST.
I have been wondering what Feb 22 actually means - since Google is >>>>>>> based
in California, is it 8am their time? midnight their time? Pull
(virtual)
ping pong balls out of a (virtual) hat until they pull the ball that >>>>>>> says stop now?
Tony
Well, Google pulled the plug. No more spam deluge, at least until he >>>>>> gets a
new service.
What did he think that he was achieving? No-one could read his spams, >>>>>> everyone just killed them on sight, it was at most a minor
inconvenience.
internet spam?
Time?
Not that much to set up a bot that pumps out the contents of a text file.
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
On 2/23/2024 9:10 AM, D wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
On 2/23/2024 4:32 AM, WolfFan wrote:
On Feb 23, 2024, Dimensional Traveler wroteJunk snail mail is considered successful if it gets a 1% response
(in article <ur9c66$clhj$3@dont-email.me>):
On 2/22/2024 5:03 PM, WolfFan wrote:
On Feb 22, 2024, Tony Nance wroteThey were ads that that person was getting paid 0.1 cents per ad
(in article <ur7qbj$3uo50$1@dont-email.me>):
On 2/22/24 6:17 AM, WolfFan wrote:
On Feb 22, 2024, Kevrob wrote
(in
article<01d546b3-815e-4438-90ef-7e6440f3f2aen@googlegroups.com>): >>>>>>>>>
Trying to see.the spammer is still kicking spam. The latest one that I saw, >>>>>>>>> briefly,
Later today (22 Feb 2024) I'll have to make other arrangements. >>>>>>>>>
before
I nuked it, had a 06:11, my time, timestamp. I’m posting at 06:16. >>>>>>>>>
I suspect that the spammer will continue right until Google
pulls the
plug.
Agreed - still spamming strong at 10:47am EST.
I have been wondering what Feb 22 actually means - since Google >>>>>>>> is based
in California, is it 8am their time? midnight their time? Pull >>>>>>>> (virtual)
ping pong balls out of a (virtual) hat until they pull the ball >>>>>>>> that
says stop now?
Tony
Well, Google pulled the plug. No more spam deluge, at least until >>>>>>> he gets a
new service.
What did he think that he was achieving? No-one could read his
spams,
everyone just killed them on sight, it was at most a minor
inconvenience.
sent?
extremely ineffective ads. not a good way to get a second project.
rate. 2% is wildly successful and snail mail costs. What costs are
there for internet spam?
Time?
Not that much to set up a bot that pumps out the contents of a text file.
Ahh, but someone has to update the text file! Check on positive answers etc.
On 2/23/2024 2:12 PM, D wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
On 2/23/2024 9:10 AM, D wrote:Ahh, but someone has to update the text file! Check on positive answers
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
On 2/23/2024 4:32 AM, WolfFan wrote:
On Feb 23, 2024, Dimensional Traveler wroteJunk snail mail is considered successful if it gets a 1% response rate. >>>>> 2% is wildly successful and snail mail costs. What costs are there for >>>>> internet spam?
(in article <ur9c66$clhj$3@dont-email.me>):
On 2/22/2024 5:03 PM, WolfFan wrote:extremely ineffective ads. not a good way to get a second project. >>>>>>
On Feb 22, 2024, Tony Nance wroteThey were ads that that person was getting paid 0.1 cents per ad sent? >>>>>>
(in article <ur7qbj$3uo50$1@dont-email.me>):
On 2/22/24 6:17 AM, WolfFan wrote:
On Feb 22, 2024, Kevrob wrote
(in
article<01d546b3-815e-4438-90ef-7e6440f3f2aen@googlegroups.com>): >>>>>>>>>>
Trying to see.the spammer is still kicking spam. The latest one that I saw, >>>>>>>>>> briefly,
Later today (22 Feb 2024) I'll have to make other arrangements. >>>>>>>>>>
before
I nuked it, had a 06:11, my time, timestamp. I’m posting at 06:16. >>>>>>>>>>
I suspect that the spammer will continue right until Google pulls >>>>>>>>>> the
plug.
Agreed - still spamming strong at 10:47am EST.
I have been wondering what Feb 22 actually means - since Google is >>>>>>>>> based
in California, is it 8am their time? midnight their time? Pull >>>>>>>>> (virtual)
ping pong balls out of a (virtual) hat until they pull the ball that >>>>>>>>> says stop now?
Tony
Well, Google pulled the plug. No more spam deluge, at least until he >>>>>>>> gets a
new service.
What did he think that he was achieving? No-one could read his spams, >>>>>>>> everyone just killed them on sight, it was at most a minor
inconvenience.
Time?
Not that much to set up a bot that pumps out the contents of a text file. >>
etc.
Done by the people/companies that hire the spammer.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 07:01:28 |
| Calls: | 10,386 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 14,058 |
| Messages: | 6,416,639 |