• (ReacTor) When Did SFF Get Too Big?

    From James Nicoll@21:1/5 to All on Thu Sep 26 16:09:33 2024
    When Did SFF Get Too Big?

    Is it possible to pinpoint the moment when readers stopped being able
    to keep up with their favorite genres?

    https://reactormag.com/when-did-sff-get-too-big/
    --
    My reviews can be found at http://jamesdavisnicoll.com/
    My tor pieces at https://www.tor.com/author/james-davis-nicoll/
    My Dreamwidth at https://james-davis-nicoll.dreamwidth.org/
    My patreon is at https://www.patreon.com/jamesdnicoll

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joy Beeson@21:1/5 to Nicoll on Sat Sep 28 21:33:22 2024
    On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 16:09:33 -0000 (UTC), jdnicoll@panix.com (James
    Nicoll) wrote:


    https://reactormag.com/when-did-sff-get-too-big/


    My desk had a hole for an inkwell, but we kept our ink in the bottles
    it came in.

    Some people the same age as me find writing exhausting because their
    schools used pencils or ballpoints for their penmanship exercises, and
    they learned to engrave their writing, pressing hard enough to make
    fifteen carbons.

    If I pressed too hard while writing, I broke my pen point and had to
    spend two cents of my candy money to buy another one.

    I've been addicted to keyboards for well over six decades, but I can
    still jot down a legible note whenever I please. And I please nearly
    every day. Spouse consideres writing his name in a guestbook an
    intolerable chore.

    --
    Joy Beeson
    joy beeson at centurylink dot net
    http://wlweather.net/PAGEJOY/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Dorsey@21:1/5 to petertrei@gmail.com on Sun Sep 29 16:28:06 2024
    Cryptoengineer <petertrei@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 9/28/2024 9:33 PM, Joy Beeson wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 16:09:33 -0000 (UTC), jdnicoll@panix.com (James
    Nicoll) wrote:


    https://reactormag.com/when-did-sff-get-too-big/


    My desk had a hole for an inkwell, but we kept our ink in the bottles
    it came in.

    This is good. Too many kids would not keep the ink where it belonged but
    would instead use fountain pens to squirt one another in the face.

    The inkwells were used in the days of dip pens. In the late 60s, I was >probably in 4th grade when we graduated to fountain pens. Since they
    didn't need to be constantly reloaded with ink, the desk inkwell became >obsolete.

    I never used a dip pen except in art class, but I can see it would have
    major advantages over fountain pens with bladders that could be used to
    squirt people with.
    --scott
    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted Nolan @21:1/5 to Scott Dorsey on Sun Sep 29 17:34:17 2024
    In article <vdbv6m$bsm$1@panix2.panix.com>,
    Scott Dorsey <kludge@panix.com> wrote:
    Cryptoengineer <petertrei@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 9/28/2024 9:33 PM, Joy Beeson wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 16:09:33 -0000 (UTC), jdnicoll@panix.com (James
    Nicoll) wrote:


    https://reactormag.com/when-did-sff-get-too-big/


    My desk had a hole for an inkwell, but we kept our ink in the bottles
    it came in.

    This is good. Too many kids would not keep the ink where it belonged but >would instead use fountain pens to squirt one another in the face.

    The inkwells were used in the days of dip pens. In the late 60s, I was >>probably in 4th grade when we graduated to fountain pens. Since they
    didn't need to be constantly reloaded with ink, the desk inkwell became >>obsolete.

    I never used a dip pen except in art class, but I can see it would have
    major advantages over fountain pens with bladders that could be used to >squirt people with.

    However, pigtails.
    --
    columbiaclosings.com
    What's not in Columbia anymore..

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@21:1/5 to Joy Beeson on Sun Sep 29 19:40:42 2024
    On 9/28/2024 6:33 PM, Joy Beeson wrote:

    On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 16:09:33 -0000 (UTC), jdnicoll@panix.com (James
    Nicoll) wrote:


    https://reactormag.com/when-did-sff-get-too-big/


    My desk had a hole for an inkwell, but we kept our ink in the bottles
    it came in.

    Some people the same age as me find writing exhausting because their
    schools used pencils or ballpoints for their penmanship exercises, and
    they learned to engrave their writing, pressing hard enough to make
    fifteen carbons.

    If I pressed too hard while writing, I broke my pen point and had to
    spend two cents of my candy money to buy another one.

    I've been addicted to keyboards for well over six decades, but I can
    still jot down a legible note whenever I please. And I please nearly
    every day. Spouse consideres writing his name in a guestbook an
    intolerable chore.

    My writing is completely block print now. But quick and _legible_ block
    print. I've actually gotten many complements over the years on how
    readable my writing is.

    --
    I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
    dirty old man.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Charles Packer@21:1/5 to Ahasuerus on Wed Oct 2 07:27:56 2024
    On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 20:02:52 -0400, Ahasuerus wrote:


    On a more serious note, Earl Kemp's comment:

    I knew everything that was being published and read everything up
    until the 1940s

    makes a good deal of sense. As I wrote back in March, there were only 3 stable science fiction monthlies between mid-1930 and mid-1938:
    *Amazing*, *Astounding* and *Wonder* (*Thrilling Wonder* after 1936.)

    Things began to change in mid-1938 with the launch of *Marvel* and then
    the Golden Age started in 1939: *Planet Stories*, *Captain Future*, *Startling Stories*, *Dynamic*, *Famous Fantastic Mysteries*, *Science Fiction*/*Future Fiction*, *Strange Stories*, *Uncanny Tales*, *Marvel Science Stories*, *Fantastic Adventures*, *Science Fiction Quarterly*,
    *Super Science Stories*, *Astonishing Stories*, *Cosmic Stories*,
    *Fantastic Novels*, *Stirring Science Stories*, *Unknown*.

    Even if you skipped the reprints (some magazines specialized in
    reprints), there was a significant amount of SF content being published
    every month.


    Looking at the Google Ngram for the category English Fiction
    (using "planet" as a proxy for SF) I see a distinct bump at 1940.

    https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph? content=planet&year_start=1900&year_end=2019&corpus=en- fiction&smoothing=0&case_insensitive=false

    Shortened: https://tinyurl.com/c67kwdj2

    Could that be explained by what you have listed? Then I wonder
    what the bump at 1930 is.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From James Nicoll@21:1/5 to mailbox@cpacker.org on Wed Oct 2 13:27:41 2024
    In article <pan$56ee4$d645566b$59a52e94$f0af4f6f@cpacker.org>,
    Charles Packer <mailbox@cpacker.org> wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 20:02:52 -0400, Ahasuerus wrote:


    On a more serious note, Earl Kemp's comment:

    I knew everything that was being published and read everything up
    until the 1940s

    makes a good deal of sense. As I wrote back in March, there were only 3
    stable science fiction monthlies between mid-1930 and mid-1938:
    *Amazing*, *Astounding* and *Wonder* (*Thrilling Wonder* after 1936.)

    Things began to change in mid-1938 with the launch of *Marvel* and then
    the Golden Age started in 1939: *Planet Stories*, *Captain Future*,
    *Startling Stories*, *Dynamic*, *Famous Fantastic Mysteries*, *Science
    Fiction*/*Future Fiction*, *Strange Stories*, *Uncanny Tales*, *Marvel
    Science Stories*, *Fantastic Adventures*, *Science Fiction Quarterly*,
    *Super Science Stories*, *Astonishing Stories*, *Cosmic Stories*,
    *Fantastic Novels*, *Stirring Science Stories*, *Unknown*.

    Even if you skipped the reprints (some magazines specialized in
    reprints), there was a significant amount of SF content being published
    every month.


    Looking at the Google Ngram for the category English Fiction
    (using "planet" as a proxy for SF) I see a distinct bump at 1940.

    https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph? >content=planet&year_start=1900&year_end=2019&corpus=en- >fiction&smoothing=0&case_insensitive=false

    Shortened: https://tinyurl.com/c67kwdj2

    Could that be explained by what you have listed? Then I wonder
    what the bump at 1930 is.

    Pluto was discovered in February 1930.


    --
    My reviews can be found at http://jamesdavisnicoll.com/
    My tor pieces at https://www.tor.com/author/james-davis-nicoll/
    My Dreamwidth at https://james-davis-nicoll.dreamwidth.org/
    My patreon is at https://www.patreon.com/jamesdnicoll

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ahasuerus@21:1/5 to Charles Packer on Wed Oct 2 10:36:27 2024
    On 10/2/2024 3:27 AM, Charles Packer wrote:
    On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 20:02:52 -0400, Ahasuerus wrote:


    On a more serious note, Earl Kemp's comment:

    > I knew everything that was being published and read everything up
    > until the 1940s

    makes a good deal of sense. As I wrote back in March, there were only 3
    stable science fiction monthlies between mid-1930 and mid-1938:
    *Amazing*, *Astounding* and *Wonder* (*Thrilling Wonder* after 1936.)

    Things began to change in mid-1938 with the launch of *Marvel* and then
    the Golden Age started in 1939: *Planet Stories*, *Captain Future*,
    *Startling Stories*, *Dynamic*, *Famous Fantastic Mysteries*, *Science
    Fiction*/*Future Fiction*, *Strange Stories*, *Uncanny Tales*, *Marvel
    Science Stories*, *Fantastic Adventures*, *Science Fiction Quarterly*,
    *Super Science Stories*, *Astonishing Stories*, *Cosmic Stories*,
    *Fantastic Novels*, *Stirring Science Stories*, *Unknown*.

    Even if you skipped the reprints (some magazines specialized in
    reprints), there was a significant amount of SF content being published
    every month.


    Looking at the Google Ngram for the category English Fiction
    (using "planet" as a proxy for SF) I see a distinct bump at 1940.

    https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph? content=planet&year_start=1900&year_end=2019&corpus=en- fiction&smoothing=0&case_insensitive=false

    Shortened: https://tinyurl.com/c67kwdj2

    Could that be explained by what you have listed? Then I wonder
    what the bump at 1930 is.

    It may be related to the timeline of the Gernsback era:

    1926, April: _Amazing_
    1929, June: _Science Wonder_
    1929, July: _Air Wonder_
    1930, January: _Astounding_
    1930, June: _Air Wonder_ and _Science Wonder_ merge to become _Wonder
    Stories_, which becomes _Thrilling Wonder Stories_ in August 1936

    The peak during the early 1950s may be related to the explosion in the
    number of SF digests in 1953.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ahasuerus@21:1/5 to Lynn McGuire on Thu Sep 26 20:02:52 2024
    On 9/26/2024 4:30 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
    [snip]
    So, should all SFF writers become government registered [snip]

    How else would ISFDB editors know whether the latest "Andrew Smith"
    story was written by:

    Andrew Smith - https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?179138
    Andrew Smith (I) - https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?179140
    Andrew Smith (II) - https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?179139
    Andrew Smith (III) - https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?213355
    Andrew Smith (IV) - https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?179142
    Andrew Smith (V) - https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?179141
    Andrew Smith (VI) - https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?261371
    Andrew Smith (VII) - https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?280123
    or Andrew Smith (VIII) - https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?309023

    ?!

    On a more serious note, Earl Kemp's comment:

    I knew everything that was being published and read everything
    up until the 1940s

    makes a good deal of sense. As I wrote back in March, there were only 3
    stable science fiction monthlies between mid-1930 and mid-1938:
    *Amazing*, *Astounding* and *Wonder* (*Thrilling Wonder* after 1936.)

    Things began to change in mid-1938 with the launch of *Marvel* and then
    the Golden Age started in 1939: *Planet Stories*, *Captain Future*,
    *Startling Stories*, *Dynamic*, *Famous Fantastic Mysteries*, *Science Fiction*/*Future Fiction*, *Strange Stories*, *Uncanny Tales*, *Marvel
    Science Stories*, *Fantastic Adventures*, *Science Fiction Quarterly*,
    *Super Science Stories*, *Astonishing Stories*, *Cosmic Stories*,
    *Fantastic Novels*, *Stirring Science Stories*, *Unknown*.

    Even if you skipped the reprints (some magazines specialized in
    reprints), there was a significant amount of SF content being published
    every month.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pyotr filipivich@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 27 08:23:57 2024
    Ahasuerus <ahasuerus@email.com> on Thu, 26 Sep 2024 20:02:52 -0400
    typed in rec.arts.sf.written the following:

    On a more serious note, Earl Kemp's comment:

    I knew everything that was being published and read everything
    up until the 1940s

    makes a good deal of sense.

    It also covers not only SFF, but just about every category of publication these days, especially technical papers.
    --
    pyotr filipivich
    This Week's Panel: Us & Them - Eliminating Them.
    Next Month's Panel: Having eliminated the old Them(tm)
    Selecting who insufficiently Woke(tm) as to serve as the new Them(tm)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Dorsey@21:1/5 to ahasuerus@email.com on Fri Sep 27 18:21:12 2024
    Ahasuerus <ahasuerus@email.com> wrote:
    On 9/26/2024 4:30 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
    [snip]
    So, should all SFF writers become government registered [snip]

    How else would ISFDB editors know whether the latest "Andrew Smith"
    story was written by:

    Andrew Smith - https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?179138
    Andrew Smith (I) - https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?179140
    Andrew Smith (II) - https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?179139
    Andrew Smith (III) - https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?213355
    Andrew Smith (IV) - https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?179142
    Andrew Smith (V) - https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?179141
    Andrew Smith (VI) - https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?261371
    Andrew Smith (VII) - https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?280123
    or Andrew Smith (VIII) - https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/ea.cgi?309023

    There is only one real Andrew Smith and he is a positronic robot.
    --scott


    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)