• Re: Pearls Before Swine: Uncle At The Door

    From Bobbie Sellers@21:1/5 to Scott Lurndal on Wed Jan 8 15:52:11 2025
    On 1/8/25 14:11, Scott Lurndal wrote:
    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
    Pearls Before Swine: Uncle At The Door
    https://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2025/01/08

    I figure before this nightmare is over, they will come for all of our

    It's your fault. Voting for for the spend and no tax republicans.

    One should reduce spending - before - reducing the income. Any rational non-republican recognizes that. The "starve the beast" idiom is stupid
    GOP thinking that obviously hasn't been effective.

    MAGA voted for the billionaires pal. He is such a good pal that
    he cut taxes before on the most well off to move the burden of the
    nation's wars and disasters to the less well off. He intends to
    continue this inflationary policy until he stops breathing.
    People believed him when he said he would cut the cost of
    the groceries but as soon he could he gave an interview and said
    it was impossible. We controlled prices during WW II so it is not
    impossible. We have several wars going on right now the most meanful
    is to reduce carbon dioxide output from human activities so the
    War On Climate Change might make rationing and price controls
    rational again.

    bliss - the hobbler

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Lurndal@21:1/5 to Lynn McGuire on Thu Jan 9 22:32:20 2025
    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
    On 1/8/2025 5:52 PM, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
    On 1/8/25 14:11, Scott Lurndal wrote:
    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
    Pearls Before Swine: Uncle At The Door
        https://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2025/01/08

    I figure before this nightmare is over, they will come for all of our

    It's your fault.   Voting for for the spend and no tax republicans.

    One should reduce spending - before - reducing the income.  Any rational >>> non-republican recognizes that.   The "starve the beast" idiom is stupid >>> GOP thinking that obviously hasn't been effective.

        MAGA voted for the billionaires pal. He is such a good pal that
    he cut taxes before on the most well off to move the burden of the
    nation's wars and disasters to the less well off. He intends to
    continue this inflationary policy until he stops breathing.
        People believed him when he said he would cut the cost of
    the groceries but as soon he could he gave an interview and said
    it was impossible. We controlled prices during WW II so it is not
    impossible. We have several wars going on right now the most meanful
    is to reduce carbon dioxide output from human activities so the
    War On Climate Change might make rationing and price controls
    rational again.

        bliss - the hobbler

    Hey Bobbie,

    Got water in your fire hydrants ?

    What kind of idiotic question is that?

    Four million gallons in four tanks atop a hill[*]
    cannot be filled fast enough when one is fighing
    an unprecedented firestorm. And they had many
    back up sources, including pools and hundreds of
    tenders (and the ocean along PCH).

    As windspeeds (70-90mph gusts) prevented the most effective
    means of supressing fire (air drops), the tanks were what
    was available in the palisades. Even an infinite
    supply wouldn't have helped due to the fundamental
    limits of firefighters and fire fighting equipment
    along with embers (some the size of small tree limbs) that
    were flying up to two miles from the fireline.

    [*] presurizing the system

    One might note that many of the homes that were
    spared had metal or tile roofs and little exterior
    wood. Seems like a recipe for rebuilding a more
    robust infrastructure.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bobbie Sellers@21:1/5 to Lynn McGuire on Thu Jan 9 14:57:45 2025
    On 1/9/25 12:21, Lynn McGuire wrote:
    On 1/8/2025 5:52 PM, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
    On 1/8/25 14:11, Scott Lurndal wrote:
    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
    Pearls Before Swine: Uncle At The Door
        https://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2025/01/08

    I figure before this nightmare is over, they will come for all of our

    It's your fault.   Voting for for the spend and no tax republicans.

    One should reduce spending - before - reducing the income.  Any rational >>> non-republican recognizes that.   The "starve the beast" idiom is stupid >>> GOP thinking that obviously hasn't been effective.

         MAGA voted for the billionaires pal. He is such a good pal that
    he cut taxes before on the most well off to move the burden of the
    nation's wars and disasters to the less well off. He intends to
    continue this inflationary policy until he stops breathing.
         People believed him when he said he would cut the cost of
    the groceries but as soon he could he gave an interview and said
    it was impossible. We controlled prices during WW II so it is not
    impossible. We have several wars going on right now the most meanful
    is to reduce carbon dioxide output from human activities so the
    War On Climate Change might make rationing and price controls
    rational again.

         bliss - the hobbler

    Hey Bobbie,

    Got water in your fire hydrants ?

    Lynn


    I live in San Francisco not the City of the Angels.
    Since the Fire and Quake in 1906, Water for the Hydrants
    has been a big item.

    Remember when thinking of Los Angeles that the
    Devils and Demons are all fallen angels. There are books
    and Movies that relate the way LA got its water and now
    it is attempting to drain the rivers of Northern California.
    Look up Delta Project in the Central Valley of California.

    bliss - the hobbler

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Dorsey@21:1/5 to lynnmcguire5@gmail.com on Thu Jan 9 23:20:53 2025
    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hey Bobbie,

    Got water in your fire hydrants ?

    I'm okay but the city down the road (Richmond, VA) has been without
    for about three days now. Looks like a case of poor plant maintenance
    combined with electrical infrastructure that has fellen badly behind
    demand but full details are not available yet.
    --scott
    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Titus G@21:1/5 to Bobbie Sellers on Fri Jan 10 16:53:03 2025
    On 10/01/25 11:57, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
    snip There are books
    and Movies that relate the way LA got its water and now

    And one of my favourite tracks, Ole Mulholland by Frank Black.

    it is attempting to drain the rivers of Northern California.

    I recently posted about Paolo Baculup 's The Water Knife, a brilliant
    tale of a dystopic future where water is a scarce commodity.

    Look up Delta Project in the Central Valley of California.

        bliss - the hobbler

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul S Person@21:1/5 to bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com on Fri Jan 10 09:12:32 2025
    On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 15:52:11 -0800, Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> wrote:

    On 1/8/25 14:11, Scott Lurndal wrote:
    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
    Pearls Before Swine: Uncle At The Door
    https://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2025/01/08

    I figure before this nightmare is over, they will come for all of our

    It's your fault. Voting for for the spend and no tax republicans.

    One should reduce spending - before - reducing the income. Any rational
    non-republican recognizes that. The "starve the beast" idiom is stupid
    GOP thinking that obviously hasn't been effective.

    MAGA voted for the billionaires pal. He is such a good pal that
    he cut taxes before on the most well off to move the burden of the
    nation's wars and disasters to the less well off. He intends to
    continue this inflationary policy until he stops breathing.
    People believed him when he said he would cut the cost of
    the groceries but as soon he could he gave an interview and said
    it was impossible. We controlled prices during WW II so it is not
    impossible. We have several wars going on right now the most meanful
    is to reduce carbon dioxide output from human activities so the
    War On Climate Change might make rationing and price controls
    rational again.

    I don't think Trump is going to mimic a war waged to defeat Hitler and everything Trump stands for.

    Besides, he will never be able to run for President again [1]. He
    doesn't need his base's votes. And Trump always stiffs people he
    doesn't need any more.

    [1] I suppose he could run as VP under some other Republican, who
    would then resign as soon as both were sworn in. But I can't see Trump
    running for the second position.
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul S Person@21:1/5 to Scott Dorsey on Fri Jan 10 09:22:38 2025
    On 9 Jan 2025 23:20:53 -0000, kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote:

    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hey Bobbie,

    Got water in your fire hydrants ?

    I'm okay but the city down the road (Richmond, VA) has been without
    for about three days now. Looks like a case of poor plant maintenance >combined with electrical infrastructure that has fellen badly behind
    demand but full details are not available yet.

    Ah.

    Infrastructure.

    Not a sexy topic, politically (or any other way, I suspect). So it
    tends to be ignored because "nobody cares".

    Until it fails. Then /lots/ of people care.

    Here's a clue: if the Biden infrastructure funding has been used up,
    the only real alternative is /local taxes for local projects/. This
    will not, I suppose affect you, but Richmond might find it a useful
    concept.
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul S Person@21:1/5 to bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com on Fri Jan 10 09:19:31 2025
    On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 14:57:45 -0800, Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> wrote:

    On 1/9/25 12:21, Lynn McGuire wrote:

    <snippo discussion of how Republicans will pay the National Debt. As
    if they would ever even try.>

    <and now we have a sudden change in topic>

    Got water in your fire hydrants ?

    I live in San Francisco not the City of the Angels.
    Since the Fire and Quake in 1906, Water for the Hydrants
    has been a big item.

    Remember when thinking of Los Angeles that the
    Devils and Demons are all fallen angels. There are books
    and Movies that relate the way LA got its water and now
    it is attempting to drain the rivers of Northern California.
    Look up Delta Project in the Central Valley of California.

    Water is fast becoming a major resource problem [1]. I suppose I could
    take comfort in the fact that LA has a lot of rivers to rob before
    reaching the Columbia, but I don't. They need to ration their water to
    the point that no one wants to come there, and a lot of residents want
    to leave. Or invest in really impressive desalinizers. LA might be
    able to drink the Pacific, but it would take a while.

    [1] Reviews of /Quantum of Solace/ ridiculed the film for treating
    water as a vital resource when it came out. I think fewer of us would
    see it that way today.
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Lurndal@21:1/5 to Lynn McGuire on Fri Jan 10 22:04:47 2025
    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
    On 1/9/2025 4:57 PM, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
    On 1/9/25 12:21, Lynn McGuire wrote:
    On 1/8/2025 5:52 PM, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
    On 1/8/25 14:11, Scott Lurndal wrote:
    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
    Pearls Before Swine: Uncle At The Door
        https://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2025/01/08

    I figure before this nightmare is over, they will come for all of our >>>>>
    It's your fault.   Voting for for the spend and no tax republicans. >>>>>
    One should reduce spending - before - reducing the income.  Any
    rational
    non-republican recognizes that.   The "starve the beast" idiom is
    stupid
    GOP thinking that obviously hasn't been effective.

         MAGA voted for the billionaires pal. He is such a good pal that >>>> he cut taxes before on the most well off to move the burden of the
    nation's wars and disasters to the less well off. He intends to
    continue this inflationary policy until he stops breathing.
         People believed him when he said he would cut the cost of
    the groceries but as soon he could he gave an interview and said
    it was impossible. We controlled prices during WW II so it is not
    impossible. We have several wars going on right now the most meanful
    is to reduce carbon dioxide output from human activities so the
    War On Climate Change might make rationing and price controls
    rational again.

         bliss - the hobbler

    Hey Bobbie,

    Got water in your fire hydrants ?

    Lynn


        I live in San Francisco not the City of the Angels.
    Since the Fire and Quake in 1906, Water for the Hydrants
    has been a big item.

        Remember when thinking of Los Angeles that the
    Devils and Demons are all fallen angels. There are books
    and Movies that relate the way LA got its water and now
    it is attempting to drain the rivers of Northern California.
    Look up Delta Project in the Central Valley of California.

        bliss - the hobbler

    I know this, you have typed about the SF library several times.

    If LA has dropped their water sources, can San Fransisco be far behind ?

    The only problem with your question is that the first part isn't
    even partly true; therefore the second part is completely irrelevent.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bobbie Sellers@21:1/5 to Lynn McGuire on Fri Jan 10 14:48:19 2025
    On 1/10/25 13:49, Lynn McGuire wrote:
    On 1/9/2025 4:57 PM, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
    On 1/9/25 12:21, Lynn McGuire wrote:
    On 1/8/2025 5:52 PM, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
    On 1/8/25 14:11, Scott Lurndal wrote:
    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
    Pearls Before Swine: Uncle At The Door
        https://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2025/01/08

    I figure before this nightmare is over, they will come for all of our >>>>>
    It's your fault.   Voting for for the spend and no tax republicans. >>>>>
    One should reduce spending - before - reducing the income.  Any
    rational
    non-republican recognizes that.   The "starve the beast" idiom is
    stupid
    GOP thinking that obviously hasn't been effective.

         MAGA voted for the billionaires pal. He is such a good pal that >>>> he cut taxes before on the most well off to move the burden of the
    nation's wars and disasters to the less well off. He intends to
    continue this inflationary policy until he stops breathing.
         People believed him when he said he would cut the cost of
    the groceries but as soon he could he gave an interview and said
    it was impossible. We controlled prices during WW II so it is not
    impossible. We have several wars going on right now the most meanful
    is to reduce carbon dioxide output from human activities so the
    War On Climate Change might make rationing and price controls
    rational again.

         bliss - the hobbler

    Hey Bobbie,

    Got water in your fire hydrants ?

    Lynn


         I live in San Francisco not the City of the Angels.
    Since the Fire and Quake in 1906, Water for the Hydrants
    has been a big item.

         Remember when thinking of Los Angeles that the
    Devils and Demons are all fallen angels. There are books
    and Movies that relate the way LA got its water and now
    it is attempting to drain the rivers of Northern California.
    Look up Delta Project in the Central Valley of California.

         bliss - the hobbler

    I know this, you have typed about the SF library several times.

    If LA has dropped their water sources, can San Fransisco be far behind ?

    Lynn


    You do not know much abour California, Northern or Southern.
    San Francisco in the early 20th Century got approval amd built a
    dam in the Sierra in a canyon as big as Yosemite and has a large
    reservoir there as well as a hydro-power generating facility.

    Los Angeles stole the water from thee Owens Valley about the
    same time and then later negotiated for Colorado River water. The
    watershed of the Colorado of late has been drier than normal and
    it is hard to get water that is not there.

    So Southern California conceived a grand solution to their
    water problems. The result was the Delta Water project which extracts
    water from the Delta of the Sacramento-San Joaquin river and via a
    long canal ships it south to LA. That is not good for either the
    wildlife of the rivers or the agricultural interests of the Central
    Valley of California but the people of LA and their swimming pools
    must be served.
    So Southern California was a desert land most of the time
    but that meant nothing to the Real Estate interests of the South.

    So Southern California should be abandoned by all but the
    entertainment industry and the retirees should move to Florida.:^(

    bliss - hobble, hobble...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Lurndal@21:1/5 to Lynn McGuire on Fri Jan 10 23:15:08 2025
    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
    On 1/10/2025 4:04 PM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
    On 1/9/2025 4:57 PM, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
    On 1/9/25 12:21, Lynn McGuire wrote:
    On 1/8/2025 5:52 PM, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
    On 1/8/25 14:11, Scott Lurndal wrote:
    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
    Pearls Before Swine: Uncle At The Door
        https://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2025/01/08

    I figure before this nightmare is over, they will come for all of our >>>>>>>
    It's your fault.   Voting for for the spend and no tax republicans. >>>>>>>
    One should reduce spending - before - reducing the income.  Any >>>>>>> rational
    non-republican recognizes that.   The "starve the beast" idiom is >>>>>>> stupid
    GOP thinking that obviously hasn't been effective.

         MAGA voted for the billionaires pal. He is such a good pal that
    he cut taxes before on the most well off to move the burden of the >>>>>> nation's wars and disasters to the less well off. He intends to
    continue this inflationary policy until he stops breathing.
         People believed him when he said he would cut the cost of >>>>>> the groceries but as soon he could he gave an interview and said
    it was impossible. We controlled prices during WW II so it is not
    impossible. We have several wars going on right now the most meanful >>>>>> is to reduce carbon dioxide output from human activities so the
    War On Climate Change might make rationing and price controls
    rational again.

         bliss - the hobbler

    Hey Bobbie,

    Got water in your fire hydrants ?

    Lynn


        I live in San Francisco not the City of the Angels.
    Since the Fire and Quake in 1906, Water for the Hydrants
    has been a big item.

        Remember when thinking of Los Angeles that the
    Devils and Demons are all fallen angels. There are books
    and Movies that relate the way LA got its water and now
    it is attempting to drain the rivers of Northern California.
    Look up Delta Project in the Central Valley of California.

        bliss - the hobbler

    I know this, you have typed about the SF library several times.

    If LA has dropped their water sources, can San Fransisco be far behind ?

    The only problem with your question is that the first part isn't
    even partly true; therefore the second part is completely irrelevent.

    https://fakenews.com/jenvanlaar/2025/01/10/bombshell-key-reservoir-was-empty-when-palisades-fire-started-contributed-to-loss-of-homes-and-life-n2184190

    You really need to find more reliable sources.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Lurndal@21:1/5 to Bobbie Sellers on Sat Jan 11 01:00:37 2025
    Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> writes:
    On 1/10/25 15:15, Scott Lurndal wrote:
    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:

    If LA has dropped their water sources, can San Fransisco be far behind ? >>>>
    The only problem with your question is that the first part isn't
    even partly true; therefore the second part is completely irrelevent.

    https://fakenews.com/jenvanlaar/2025/01/10/bombshell-key-reservoir-was-empty-when-palisades-fire-started-contributed-to-loss-of-homes-and-life-n2184190

    You really need to find more reliable sources.

    No use talking to him as he believes every lie out of Putin's Puppet,
    Trump's mouth as well as those from Putin himself and Tucker
    Carlson of all people. Maybe a paid provocateur? What salary does
    Russia pay Lynn McGuire?

    Actually, he's in the the pocket of the fossil fuel industry, and
    his income is completely dependent upon the oil industry.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bobbie Sellers@21:1/5 to Scott Lurndal on Fri Jan 10 16:42:27 2025
    On 1/10/25 15:15, Scott Lurndal wrote:
    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
    On 1/10/2025 4:04 PM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
    On 1/9/2025 4:57 PM, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
    On 1/9/25 12:21, Lynn McGuire wrote:
    On 1/8/2025 5:52 PM, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
    On 1/8/25 14:11, Scott Lurndal wrote:
    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
    Pearls Before Swine: Uncle At The Door
        https://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2025/01/08 >>>>>>>>>
    I figure before this nightmare is over, they will come for all of our >>>>>>>>
    It's your fault.   Voting for for the spend and no tax republicans. >>>>>>>>
    One should reduce spending - before - reducing the income.  Any >>>>>>>> rational
    non-republican recognizes that.   The "starve the beast" idiom is >>>>>>>> stupid
    GOP thinking that obviously hasn't been effective.

         MAGA voted for the billionaires pal. He is such a good pal that
    he cut taxes before on the most well off to move the burden of the >>>>>>> nation's wars and disasters to the less well off. He intends to
    continue this inflationary policy until he stops breathing.
         People believed him when he said he would cut the cost of >>>>>>> the groceries but as soon he could he gave an interview and said >>>>>>> it was impossible. We controlled prices during WW II so it is not >>>>>>> impossible. We have several wars going on right now the most meanful >>>>>>> is to reduce carbon dioxide output from human activities so the
    War On Climate Change might make rationing and price controls
    rational again.

         bliss - the hobbler

    Hey Bobbie,

    Got water in your fire hydrants ?

    Lynn


        I live in San Francisco not the City of the Angels.
    Since the Fire and Quake in 1906, Water for the Hydrants
    has been a big item.

        Remember when thinking of Los Angeles that the
    Devils and Demons are all fallen angels. There are books
    and Movies that relate the way LA got its water and now
    it is attempting to drain the rivers of Northern California.
    Look up Delta Project in the Central Valley of California.

        bliss - the hobbler

    I know this, you have typed about the SF library several times.

    If LA has dropped their water sources, can San Fransisco be far behind ? >>>
    The only problem with your question is that the first part isn't
    even partly true; therefore the second part is completely irrelevent.

    https://fakenews.com/jenvanlaar/2025/01/10/bombshell-key-reservoir-was-empty-when-palisades-fire-started-contributed-to-loss-of-homes-and-life-n2184190

    You really need to find more reliable sources.

    No use talking to him as he believes every lie out of Putin's Puppet, Trump's mouth as well as those from Putin himself and Tucker
    Carlson of all people. Maybe a paid provocateur? What salary does
    Russia pay Lynn McGuire?
    Perhaps he is depending on a political position under the
    new regime. If traitors are not murdered by the people who
    seduced them into treason, the resistance must attend to them.
    Check out France WW II.

    bliss

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bobbie Sellers@21:1/5 to Dimensional Traveler on Fri Jan 10 18:42:17 2025
    On 1/10/25 18:05, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    On 1/10/2025 9:09 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Wed, 08 Jan 2025 22:11:49 GMT, scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
    wrote:

    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
    Pearls Before Swine: Uncle At The Door
        https://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2025/01/08

    I figure before this nightmare is over, they will come for all of our

    It's your fault.   Voting for for the spend and no tax republicans.

    I call them "spend and spend". As opposed to the "tax and spend"
    Democrats fiscally-conservative Republicans used to attack.

    One should reduce spending - before - reducing the income.  Any rational >>> non-republican recognizes that.   The "starve the beast" idiom is stupid >>> GOP thinking that obviously hasn't been effective.

    The goal of the GOP since Ronnie has been to destroy Social Security.

    The National Debt is their primary weapon.

    They aren't going to reduce it -- they are going to use it to destroy
    Social Security, and probably Medicare as well.

    Because, after all, 1%-ers don't need those programs, so nobody else
    does either.

    The /real/ problem is that the Dems aren't going to reduce the
    National Debt either. Even if they collect money to do so, they will
    find something else to spend it on.

    Both Parties need severe wedgies. Republicans more than Democrats, but
    the Dems are by no means exempt.

    Historically the Dems have reduced the national debt and balanced the
    budget MUCH, MUCH, MUCH more than the Repubs.  The Repubs don't even try
    to do either.


    Yes but the Democratic Party at the National Level seems to
    fumble getting this across to the Electorate. As well as the truism
    that Democratic dominance means the people have better lives and
    more secure employment. I do not like the present Republican Party
    attitude towards wealth and taxation.Even George the Second (the bush)
    saw the need to raise taxes but of course George the Third (bush) was
    all about invading Iraq and not raising taxes to pay for the War.

    The last truly sane Republican President was Eisenhower
    who taxed the rich at high levels. His successor was a rich man
    and a Democratic party member who cut the taxes on the rich which
    his family and his pals were very grateful for.

    The National Debt is a big nothing but money we owe to
    ourselves. If we raised taxes on those to whom it would not
    represent a hardship we could do without it but that is against
    Republican Mythology.

    Tricle down economics is not even a trickle but more
    like the Chinese water torture of myth.

    bliss

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bobbie Sellers@21:1/5 to Cryptoengineer on Fri Jan 10 18:29:27 2025
    On 1/10/25 18:05, Cryptoengineer wrote:
    On 1/10/2025 8:44 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
    On 1/10/2025 5:15 PM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
    On 1/10/2025 4:04 PM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
    On 1/9/2025 4:57 PM, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
    On 1/9/25 12:21, Lynn McGuire wrote:
    On 1/8/2025 5:52 PM, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
    On 1/8/25 14:11, Scott Lurndal wrote:
    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
    Pearls Before Swine: Uncle At The Door
          https://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2025/01/08 >>>>>>>>>>>
    I figure before this nightmare is over, they will come for >>>>>>>>>>> all of our

    It's your fault.   Voting for for the spend and no tax
    republicans.

    One should reduce spending - before - reducing the income.  Any >>>>>>>>>> rational
    non-republican recognizes that.   The "starve the beast" idiom is >>>>>>>>>> stupid
    GOP thinking that obviously hasn't been effective.

           MAGA voted for the billionaires pal. He is such a good >>>>>>>>> pal that
    he cut taxes before on the most well off to move the burden of the >>>>>>>>> nation's wars and disasters to the less well off. He intends to >>>>>>>>> continue this inflationary policy until he stops breathing.
           People believed him when he said he would cut the cost of
    the groceries but as soon he could he gave an interview and said >>>>>>>>> it was impossible. We controlled prices during WW II so it is not >>>>>>>>> impossible. We have several wars going on right now the most >>>>>>>>> meanful
    is to reduce carbon dioxide output from human activities so the >>>>>>>>> War On Climate Change might make rationing and price controls >>>>>>>>> rational again.

           bliss - the hobbler

    Hey Bobbie,

    Got water in your fire hydrants ?

    Lynn


           I live in San Francisco not the City of the Angels. >>>>>>> Since the Fire and Quake in 1906, Water for the Hydrants
    has been a big item.

           Remember when thinking of Los Angeles that the
    Devils and Demons are all fallen angels. There are books
    and Movies that relate the way LA got its water and now
    it is attempting to drain the rivers of Northern California.
    Look up Delta Project in the Central Valley of California.

           bliss - the hobbler

    I know this, you have typed about the SF library several times.

    If LA has dropped their water sources, can San Fransisco be far
    behind ?

    The only problem with your question is that the first part isn't
    even partly true; therefore the second part is completely irrelevent. >>>>
    https://fakenews.com/jenvanlaar/2025/01/10/bombshell-key-reservoir-
    was-empty-when-palisades-fire-started-contributed-to-loss-of-homes-
    and-life-n2184190

    You really need to find more reliable sources.

    https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-01-10/as-flames-raged-
    in- palisades-a-key-reservoir-nearby-was-offline

    Lynn


    The story's true - I saw it from other sources too. Why you chose to
    point us at a garbage source to start, I don't know.
    The reservoir was down for quite some time to repair rips in its cover.

    Would it have made a difference? We're certainly going to see analysis
    of this in the coming months, as politicians move into the
    finger-pointing phase.

    The impression I get is that it would have helped, but not hugely. It
    could have feed some more water to the tanks that pressurized the
    hydrants, but probably not fast enough to keep the highest ones running.

    The system simply wasn't sized to deal with this big and widespread a
    fire - it would have been fine if a few streets were involved but not
    30 square miles of houses. The problem was compounded by the high
    winds, which not only spread the fire, but also grounded air tankers.

    pt

    The real problem originated last year when after two years
    of heavier than normal rain no fuel clearance was done by the
    County and the State on the coastal range behind the LA basin.
    As was pointed out today by the Mayor of LA, the Fire Department
    is much smaller than the City requires but has not been dealt
    with for many years while the City of Los Angeles has grown both
    in population and area. Who resists paying property taxes to
    the City for vital services? I dunno but the original property
    tax reduction done some years ago benefitted big business though
    it was touted as a benefit to old retired folks. That was I believe
    Proposition 13. Well I don't have to believe it I have the
    WWW and it tells me that in 1978.
    Proposition 13 is an amendment of the Constitution of California enacted during 1978, by means of the initiative process, to cap property taxes and limit property reassessments to when the property changes ownership, and to require a 2/3 majority for
    tax increases in the state legislature.

    So the rich profitted immensely and the old folks without
    county services paid for by property taxes soon lost any benefit.
    Not only the retired but the young suffered as programs like
    Physical Education and Art including Music were cut back to what
    the parents could afford. I think that is when Civics education
    was cut.

    I think San Francisco voted solidly against this measure
    but the rest of the state was not so well informed as to the
    consequences. Cutting schooling is like a cutting the throat
    of the future. It certainly is a way to hobble young minds.

    bliss - hobble, hobble, my ankle is broken but not
    my spirit.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul S Person@21:1/5 to bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com on Sat Jan 11 08:54:46 2025
    On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:48:19 -0800, Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> wrote:

    On 1/10/25 13:49, Lynn McGuire wrote:

    <snippo stuff>

    If LA has dropped their water sources, can San Fransisco be far behind ?


    You do not know much abour California, Northern or Southern.
    San Francisco in the early 20th Century got approval amd built a
    dam in the Sierra in a canyon as big as Yosemite and has a large
    reservoir there as well as a hydro-power generating facility.

    Los Angeles stole the water from thee Owens Valley about the
    same time and then later negotiated for Colorado River water. The
    watershed of the Colorado of late has been drier than normal and
    it is hard to get water that is not there.

    So Southern California conceived a grand solution to their
    water problems. The result was the Delta Water project which extracts
    water from the Delta of the Sacramento-San Joaquin river and via a
    long canal ships it south to LA. That is not good for either the
    wildlife of the rivers or the agricultural interests of the Central
    Valley of California but the people of LA and their swimming pools
    must be served.
    So Southern California was a desert land most of the time
    but that meant nothing to the Real Estate interests of the South.

    So Southern California should be abandoned by all but the
    entertainment industry and the retirees should move to Florida.:^(

    Florida is out -- retirees are fleeing because of the high condo fees,
    or some such nonsense.

    Well, according to /some/ online sources, anyway.
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul S Person@21:1/5 to bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com on Sat Jan 11 09:15:23 2025
    On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 18:42:17 -0800, Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> wrote:

    <snip-a-bit>

    The last truly sane Republican President was Eisenhower
    who taxed the rich at high levels.

    High levels in the higher tax brackets were part of fighting and
    winning WWII. It took a while to relax from so intense an event. But
    we didn't stay relaxed.

    [https://www.thebalancemoney.com/national-debt-by-year-compared-to-gdp-and-major-events-3306287]
    is an interesting table.
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@21:1/5 to Paul S Person on Sat Jan 11 11:32:54 2025
    On 1/11/2025 8:54 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:48:19 -0800, Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> wrote:

    On 1/10/25 13:49, Lynn McGuire wrote:

    <snippo stuff>

    If LA has dropped their water sources, can San Fransisco be far behind ? >>>

    You do not know much abour California, Northern or Southern.
    San Francisco in the early 20th Century got approval amd built a
    dam in the Sierra in a canyon as big as Yosemite and has a large
    reservoir there as well as a hydro-power generating facility.

    Los Angeles stole the water from thee Owens Valley about the
    same time and then later negotiated for Colorado River water. The
    watershed of the Colorado of late has been drier than normal and
    it is hard to get water that is not there.

    So Southern California conceived a grand solution to their
    water problems. The result was the Delta Water project which extracts
    water from the Delta of the Sacramento-San Joaquin river and via a
    long canal ships it south to LA. That is not good for either the
    wildlife of the rivers or the agricultural interests of the Central
    Valley of California but the people of LA and their swimming pools
    must be served.
    So Southern California was a desert land most of the time
    but that meant nothing to the Real Estate interests of the South.

    So Southern California should be abandoned by all but the
    entertainment industry and the retirees should move to Florida.:^(

    Florida is out -- retirees are fleeing because of the high condo fees,
    or some such nonsense.

    Well, according to /some/ online sources, anyway.

    High insurance costs for all the beachfront buildings that are starting
    to subside because of rising sea levels and the resulting knock-on
    effects from that like insurance companies refusing to add new policies
    or renew existing ones because doing so would endanger their profits.

    --
    I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
    dirty old man.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Dorsey@21:1/5 to Scott Lurndal on Sat Jan 11 23:52:26 2025
    Scott Lurndal <slp53@pacbell.net> wrote:
    Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> writes:

    No use talking to him as he believes every lie out of Putin's Puppet, >>Trump's mouth as well as those from Putin himself and Tucker
    Carlson of all people. Maybe a paid provocateur? What salary does
    Russia pay Lynn McGuire?

    Actually, he's in the the pocket of the fossil fuel industry, and
    his income is completely dependent upon the oil industry.

    Which is confusing seeing that Russia is a major exporter of fossil fuels
    and therefore a competitor of the American fossil fuel industry. (Okay,
    this is an oversimplification because transportation issues mean that we
    have a somewhat different market than they... but there is a grain of truth.) --scott

    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Dorsey@21:1/5 to wthyde1953@gmail.com on Sun Jan 12 00:20:47 2025
    William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> wrote:

    People in the reinsurance industry started paying attention to the
    problem of climate change a long time ago. At about the turn of the
    century two big ones, Munich Re and Swiss Re, decided to stop offering >coverage on the US gulf coast. Others simply put up prices. As
    insurance companies rely on re-insurers to take some of the risk
    companies had to raise rates to preserve profits.

    Florida has special problems, though, since all of their elected officials
    seem to be either in the construction or real estate business. This means
    that Florida building codes have been much more lax than the rest of the country, and quite especially so for a hurricane and flood-prone area.

    Things improved a good bit after Andrew, when we got to see TV coverage of houses torn apart with chipboard subroofing and styrofoam sheeting all
    over the place, but there's still a lot of stuff not built to the newer
    code, and the newer code is nothing to write home about.

    Rising insurance narrows the pool of potential buyers. Banks won't give >mortgages for uninsured houses, so if you can't afford both the mortgage
    and insurance payments you can't buy. Prices will have to drop until
    houses start selling. If you are an older person trying to cash in on
    your house before moving to care or rental housing, you won't get the
    price you were expecting. And if you are renting, higher insurance
    costs will be passed on to you.

    This is a big deal.
    --scott

    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@21:1/5 to William Hyde on Sat Jan 11 16:17:12 2025
    On 1/11/2025 2:33 PM, William Hyde wrote:
    Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    On 1/11/2025 8:54 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:48:19 -0800, Bobbie Sellers
    <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> wrote:


        So Southern California should be abandoned by all but the
    entertainment industry and the retirees should move to Florida.:^(

    Florida is out -- retirees are fleeing because of the high condo fees,
    or some such nonsense.

    Well, according to /some/ online sources, anyway.

    High insurance costs for all the beachfront buildings that are
    starting to subside because of rising sea levels and the resulting
    knock-on effects from that like insurance companies refusing to add
    new policies or renew existing ones because doing so would endanger
    their profits.

    People in the reinsurance industry started paying attention to the
    problem of climate change a long time ago.  At about the turn of the
    century two big ones, Munich Re and Swiss Re, decided to stop offering coverage on the US gulf coast.  Others simply put up prices. As
    insurance companies rely on re-insurers to take some of the risk
    companies had to raise rates to preserve profits.

    I'd be surprised if something similar hasn't happened in fire-prone
    areas.  Insurance companies are not in the business of saving people,
    they are in the business of spreading risk and making pots of money in
    the process.

    It has happened in all of California. Same basic actions by insurance companies, trying to stop writing policies for just about anything.
    California state government has been fighting with insurance companies
    over this for a number of years, since before Newsome became Governor.

    --
    I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
    dirty old man.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Lurndal@21:1/5 to William Hyde on Sun Jan 12 16:41:52 2025
    William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> writes:
    Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    On 1/11/2025 8:54 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:48:19 -0800, Bobbie Sellers
    <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> wrote:


        So Southern California should be abandoned by all but the
    entertainment industry and the retirees should move to Florida.:^(

    Florida is out -- retirees are fleeing because of the high condo fees,
    or some such nonsense.

    Well, according to /some/ online sources, anyway.

    High insurance costs for all the beachfront buildings that are starting
    to subside because of rising sea levels and the resulting knock-on
    effects from that like insurance companies refusing to add new policies
    or renew existing ones because doing so would endanger their profits.

    People in the reinsurance industry started paying attention to the
    problem of climate change a long time ago. At about the turn of the
    century two big ones, Munich Re and Swiss Re, decided to stop offering >coverage on the US gulf coast. Others simply put up prices. As
    insurance companies rely on re-insurers to take some of the risk
    companies had to raise rates to preserve profits.

    I'd be surprised if something similar hasn't happened in fire-prone
    areas. Insurance companies are not in the business of saving people,
    they are in the business of spreading risk and making pots of money in
    the process.

    There are mutual insurers (such as state farm) where the
    risk is spread over the pool of insured with premiums adjusted
    appropriately. Excess premium dollars would be returned to the
    insured annually. Although State Farm hasn't been able to return
    anything for a decade or more IME.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul S Person@21:1/5 to dtravel@sonic.net on Sun Jan 12 08:44:42 2025
    On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 11:32:54 -0800, Dimensional Traveler
    <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:

    On 1/11/2025 8:54 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:48:19 -0800, Bobbie Sellers
    <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> wrote:

    <<snippo more stuff>>

    So Southern California should be abandoned by all but the
    entertainment industry and the retirees should move to Florida.:^(

    Florida is out -- retirees are fleeing because of the high condo fees,
    or some such nonsense.

    Well, according to /some/ online sources, anyway.

    High insurance costs for all the beachfront buildings that are starting
    to subside because of rising sea levels and the resulting knock-on
    effects from that like insurance companies refusing to add new policies
    or renew existing ones because doing so would endanger their profits.

    It's either that or raise rate ... nationwide. Gotta get the money to
    cover the claims from /somewhere/, and adding it to the National Debt
    is not available. So far.

    As other posts discussed, California is in a similar situation due to wildfires. Which ultimately may mean "poorly-managed infrastructure, specifically electricity distribution". Or not, as the case may be.

    Up here in Washington, a few years back State Farm announced a program
    where, if a forest fire threatened, they would send a contractor out
    to encase the house in anti-fire foam (or something like that). And
    then to remove it when the danger was past.

    This would, presumably, apply mostly to houses in the more rural (but
    still formed into developments/towns) areas, where the forest (and so
    the forest fire) was only a few streets away. Or so I thought until LA
    caught fire. There are a lot of trees in Seattle ... not as many as
    there used to be, because of developers who apparently never saw a
    tree they didn't want to remove, but a lot and even more in the
    suburbs. We are, after all, in the rain shadow of the Cascades, and
    rain shadows have lots of water and so of plant life.

    However, last year's bill included the information that that would no
    longer be happening. It's hard to say what the next step in this will
    be.
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@21:1/5 to Paul S Person on Sun Jan 12 08:59:34 2025
    On 1/12/2025 8:44 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 11:32:54 -0800, Dimensional Traveler
    <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:

    On 1/11/2025 8:54 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:48:19 -0800, Bobbie Sellers
    <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> wrote:

    <<snippo more stuff>>

    So Southern California should be abandoned by all but the
    entertainment industry and the retirees should move to Florida.:^(

    Florida is out -- retirees are fleeing because of the high condo fees,
    or some such nonsense.

    Well, according to /some/ online sources, anyway.

    High insurance costs for all the beachfront buildings that are starting
    to subside because of rising sea levels and the resulting knock-on
    effects from that like insurance companies refusing to add new policies
    or renew existing ones because doing so would endanger their profits.

    It's either that or raise rate ... nationwide. Gotta get the money to
    cover the claims from /somewhere/, and adding it to the National Debt
    is not available. So far.

    As other posts discussed, California is in a similar situation due to wildfires. Which ultimately may mean "poorly-managed infrastructure, specifically electricity distribution". Or not, as the case may be.

    It was in part. The electrical utilities have spend a lot of money
    (rate hikes) over the last several years updating and upgrading their electrical equipment. The largest has been moving their lines
    underground, which is not quick or cheap.


    --
    I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
    dirty old man.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to William Hyde on Mon Jan 13 10:38:00 2025
    This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
    while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

    On Sun, 12 Jan 2025, William Hyde wrote:

    Scott Lurndal wrote:
    William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> writes:
    Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    On 1/11/2025 8:54 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:48:19 -0800, Bobbie Sellers
    <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> wrote:


        So Southern California should be abandoned by all but the
    entertainment industry and the retirees should move to Florida.:^(

    Florida is out -- retirees are fleeing because of the high condo fees, >>>>> or some such nonsense.

    Well, according to /some/ online sources, anyway.

    High insurance costs for all the beachfront buildings that are starting >>>> to subside because of rising sea levels and the resulting knock-on
    effects from that like insurance companies refusing to add new policies >>>> or renew existing ones because doing so would endanger their profits.

    People in the reinsurance industry started paying attention to the
    problem of climate change a long time ago. At about the turn of the
    century two big ones, Munich Re and Swiss Re, decided to stop offering
    coverage on the US gulf coast. Others simply put up prices. As
    insurance companies rely on re-insurers to take some of the risk
    companies had to raise rates to preserve profits.

    I'd be surprised if something similar hasn't happened in fire-prone
    areas. Insurance companies are not in the business of saving people,
    they are in the business of spreading risk and making pots of money in
    the process.

    There are mutual insurers (such as state farm) where the
    risk is spread over the pool of insured with premiums adjusted
    appropriately. Excess premium dollars would be returned to the
    insured annually. Although State Farm hasn't been able to return
    anything for a decade or more IME.

    As I recall there were far more mutual firms about thirty years ago. Many demutualized, with the policy holders getting shares in the new company. It was similar to the case of S&Ls a decade or so earlier but at least in the case of my family's insurer, Canada Life, it was handled well.

    A guess at the insured cost of the current fires is 20 billion, but I'm sure that will go up. And total cost is much higher.

    William Hyde

    This is very interesting. In sweden, credit unions have almost completely vanished as well. This is sad, because as a business owner, my two enemies
    are the government and my bank. So I often thought that it would be nice
    to move my stuff to a credit union, but only one remains, and it is
    located in the other end of the country, so they are sadly not too keen on taking on customers from everywhere, but are very much locally anchored to regional farmers and people who live close by.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul S Person@21:1/5 to dtravel@sonic.net on Mon Jan 13 07:59:09 2025
    On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 08:59:34 -0800, Dimensional Traveler
    <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:

    On 1/12/2025 8:44 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 11:32:54 -0800, Dimensional Traveler
    <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:

    On 1/11/2025 8:54 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:48:19 -0800, Bobbie Sellers
    <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> wrote:

    <<snippo more stuff>>

    So Southern California should be abandoned by all but the
    entertainment industry and the retirees should move to Florida.:^(

    Florida is out -- retirees are fleeing because of the high condo fees, >>>> or some such nonsense.

    Well, according to /some/ online sources, anyway.

    High insurance costs for all the beachfront buildings that are starting
    to subside because of rising sea levels and the resulting knock-on
    effects from that like insurance companies refusing to add new policies
    or renew existing ones because doing so would endanger their profits.

    It's either that or raise rate ... nationwide. Gotta get the money to
    cover the claims from /somewhere/, and adding it to the National Debt
    is not available. So far.

    As other posts discussed, California is in a similar situation due to
    wildfires. Which ultimately may mean "poorly-managed infrastructure,
    specifically electricity distribution". Or not, as the case may be.

    It was in part. The electrical utilities have spend a lot of money
    (rate hikes) over the last several years updating and upgrading their >electrical equipment. The largest has been moving their lines
    underground, which is not quick or cheap.

    Our rates keep going up as needed to keep the electricity (and the
    water, these are two different city-run utilities) flowing. They are
    apparently installing EV chargers along parking strips in some areas.
    How that actually works I don't know: does the user charge the cost on
    a card? is the homeowner stuck for the additional electricity used by
    anyone who parks there and charges the car?

    A recent discussion on Nextdoor, fueled by a suburb with lots a trees
    and therefore lots of fallen power lines/poles in a recent major storm
    ("bomb tornado", IIRC), revealed that underground lines have problems
    too. And cost a heck of a lot more to fix. But I suppose that depends,
    to some extent, on the nature of ground they are under.
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@21:1/5 to Paul S Person on Mon Jan 13 08:06:39 2025
    On 1/13/2025 7:59 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 08:59:34 -0800, Dimensional Traveler
    <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:

    On 1/12/2025 8:44 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 11:32:54 -0800, Dimensional Traveler
    <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:

    On 1/11/2025 8:54 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:48:19 -0800, Bobbie Sellers
    <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> wrote:

    <<snippo more stuff>>

    So Southern California should be abandoned by all but the
    entertainment industry and the retirees should move to Florida.:^(

    Florida is out -- retirees are fleeing because of the high condo fees, >>>>> or some such nonsense.

    Well, according to /some/ online sources, anyway.

    High insurance costs for all the beachfront buildings that are starting >>>> to subside because of rising sea levels and the resulting knock-on
    effects from that like insurance companies refusing to add new policies >>>> or renew existing ones because doing so would endanger their profits.

    It's either that or raise rate ... nationwide. Gotta get the money to
    cover the claims from /somewhere/, and adding it to the National Debt
    is not available. So far.

    As other posts discussed, California is in a similar situation due to
    wildfires. Which ultimately may mean "poorly-managed infrastructure,
    specifically electricity distribution". Or not, as the case may be.

    It was in part. The electrical utilities have spend a lot of money
    (rate hikes) over the last several years updating and upgrading their
    electrical equipment. The largest has been moving their lines
    underground, which is not quick or cheap.

    Our rates keep going up as needed to keep the electricity (and the
    water, these are two different city-run utilities) flowing. They are apparently installing EV chargers along parking strips in some areas.
    How that actually works I don't know: does the user charge the cost on
    a card?

    The user has to pay to charge their vehicle. Think parking meters.

    is the homeowner stuck for the additional electricity used by
    anyone who parks there and charges the car?

    A recent discussion on Nextdoor, fueled by a suburb with lots a trees
    and therefore lots of fallen power lines/poles in a recent major storm
    ("bomb tornado", IIRC), revealed that underground lines have problems
    too. And cost a heck of a lot more to fix. But I suppose that depends,
    to some extent, on the nature of ground they are under.


    --
    I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
    dirty old man.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul S Person@21:1/5 to dtravel@sonic.net on Tue Jan 14 08:12:20 2025
    On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 08:06:39 -0800, Dimensional Traveler
    <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:

    On 1/13/2025 7:59 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 08:59:34 -0800, Dimensional Traveler
    <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:

    On 1/12/2025 8:44 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Jan 2025 11:32:54 -0800, Dimensional Traveler
    <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:

    On 1/11/2025 8:54 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:48:19 -0800, Bobbie Sellers
    <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> wrote:

    <<snippo more stuff>>

    So Southern California should be abandoned by all but the >>>>>>> entertainment industry and the retirees should move to Florida.:^( >>>>>>
    Florida is out -- retirees are fleeing because of the high condo fees, >>>>>> or some such nonsense.

    Well, according to /some/ online sources, anyway.

    High insurance costs for all the beachfront buildings that are starting >>>>> to subside because of rising sea levels and the resulting knock-on
    effects from that like insurance companies refusing to add new policies >>>>> or renew existing ones because doing so would endanger their profits. >>>>
    It's either that or raise rate ... nationwide. Gotta get the money to
    cover the claims from /somewhere/, and adding it to the National Debt
    is not available. So far.

    As other posts discussed, California is in a similar situation due to
    wildfires. Which ultimately may mean "poorly-managed infrastructure,
    specifically electricity distribution". Or not, as the case may be.

    It was in part. The electrical utilities have spend a lot of money
    (rate hikes) over the last several years updating and upgrading their
    electrical equipment. The largest has been moving their lines
    underground, which is not quick or cheap.

    Our rates keep going up as needed to keep the electricity (and the
    water, these are two different city-run utilities) flowing. They are
    apparently installing EV chargers along parking strips in some areas.
    How that actually works I don't know: does the user charge the cost on
    a card?

    The user has to pay to charge their vehicle. Think parking meters.

    Parking meters on steroids, but your point is well-taken.

    is the homeowner stuck for the additional electricity used by
    anyone who parks there and charges the car?

    A recent discussion on Nextdoor, fueled by a suburb with lots a trees
    and therefore lots of fallen power lines/poles in a recent major storm
    ("bomb tornado", IIRC), revealed that underground lines have problems
    too. And cost a heck of a lot more to fix. But I suppose that depends,
    to some extent, on the nature of ground they are under.
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)