I remember reading some time ago that a faster-than-light ship
designed using some derivative of the Alcubierre warp drive...
would devastate the distant solar system it was trying to visit
as soon as it tried to stop moving.
Ouch.
This recently suggested an idea to me.
What if beings in general, like us, are so desperate to achieve
FTL... that what almost always happens is that they end up blowing
up their home planet in their first attempt to launch an FTL
spaceship?
It might be that FTL is a bit trickier than we will realize when
the time comes.
quadibloc wrote:
I remember reading some time ago that a faster-than-light ship
designed using some derivative of the Alcubierre warp drive...
would devastate the distant solar system it was trying to visit
as soon as it tried to stop moving.
Ouch.
It wouldn't happen to be a Randall Garrett story, ... checking ... ,
"Time Fuze".
This recently suggested an idea to me.
What if beings in general, like us, are so desperate to achieve
FTL... that what almost always happens is that they end up blowing
up their home planet in their first attempt to launch an FTL
spaceship?
It might be that FTL is a bit trickier than we will realize when
the time comes.
OBSF reference: "Catspaw" by George O. Smith (ASF September 1948 issue, reprinted in _The Worlds of George O._ (Bantam Books, 1982).
What if beings in general, like us, are so desperate to achieve
FTL... that what almost always happens is that they end up blowing
up their home planet in their first attempt to launch an FTL
spaceship?
On 2025-03-02, quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> wrote:
What if beings in general, like us, are so desperate to achieve
FTL... that what almost always happens is that they end up blowing
up their home planet in their first attempt to launch an FTL
spaceship?
In the German _Terranauten_ series, the evil corporations used
funnel-shaped "Kaiserkraft"[1] FTL spaceships that would--insert
technobabble about "entropy"--destroy the fabric of the universe
as a side effect. Talk about pollution. There was some >psionic-organic-something environmentally friendly alternative used
by the good guys.
[1] I only caught the paperback tail-end of the series and never
read the original pulps, so I don't really know what "Kaiserkraft"
was supposed to be and how to render it in English. Maybe
"Kaiser force", named after its inventor? The literal meaning
of "Kaiser", emperor, seems unlikely in this context, but I
simply don't know.
quadibloc wrote:
I remember reading some time ago that a faster-than-light ship
designed using some derivative of the Alcubierre warp drive...
would devastate the distant solar system it was trying to visit
as soon as it tried to stop moving.
Ouch.
This recently suggested an idea to me.
What if beings in general, like us, are so desperate to achieve
FTL... that what almost always happens is that they end up blowing
up their home planet in their first attempt to launch an FTL
spaceship?
It might be that FTL is a bit trickier than we will realize when
the time comes.
John Savard
I like the Perry Rhodan, Red Thunder, and several other books solution.
There is no such thing as FTL. However, there is a means of translating yourself from one sets of universe coordinates to another set of
universe coordinates instantaneously.
I like the Perry Rhodan, Red Thunder, and several other books solution.
There is no such thing as FTL. However, there is a means of translating yourself from one sets of universe coordinates to another set of
universe coordinates instantaneously.
Wait, are you talking about #100 of the Ackerman Perry Rhodans (which is
the German Perry Rhodan #108 ?
Or #100 of the German Perry Rhodans ?
I remember reading some time ago that a faster-than-light ship
designed using some derivative of the Alcubierre warp drive...
would devastate the distant solar system it was trying to visit
as soon as it tried to stop moving.
Ouch.
There was an SF story... Our Heros, in their brand new warp
drive ship, travel to some other star system, and the star
is in the process of supernovaing. Oops, that was really bad
luck, better warp out of her really quickly. So they go back
to Earth, and the Sun is supernovaing. The drive is doing it.
If you move from A to B in less time than light takes to travel
that distance, it's FTL. Doesn't matter _how_.
In article <slrnvse8ls.s38.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>,
Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote:
If you move from A to B in less time than light takes to travel
that distance, it's FTL. Doesn't matter _how_.
Also, if you can move from A to B in less time than light takes
to travel that distance, then accelerate towards A, then travel
from B to A in less time than light takes, it doesn't matter how,
you have traveled into the past.
When that was finally explained to me in a way that I understood
*why*, it was a major "ARGH!" moment. I want my FTL. But I don't
believe in time travel into the past.
On Sun, 16 Mar 2025 03:26:13 -0000 (UTC), Mike Van Pelt ><usenet@mikevanpelt.com> wrote:
Also, if you can move from A to B in less time than light takes
to travel that distance, then accelerate towards A, then travel
from B to A in less time than light takes, it doesn't matter how,
you have traveled into the past.
You could, I suppose, adopt the Marvel approach: you can't travel into
the past because it is not /your/ past, that is, your life continues
in one continuous line regardless of what the external dating may be.
IOW, when you remember /your/ life, it will be one continuous journey
forward in time, no matter how much time-travelling you undertook.
I didn't find that a particularly sane approach but, hey, what do you
want from a comic book publisher?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 06:57:39 |
Calls: | 10,386 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 14,058 |
Messages: | 6,416,639 |